I claim to be a leader of men, who wages war against evil constantly and
mercilessly. I also ask to be a protector of the weak who will stop at the
enemy.
Some groaned and complained that unrealistic, self-reports enlarging. And
yet, I assure you, my rhetoric is deliberately and without imposing
complex. My prose is calculated. There is method to my madness. Let me
explain.
Over the past two years, I strolled violently on a very strict truth -
facts, reason and logic are not as important as I thought they were.
Emotions reason to win, always. Why? Because reason can rationalize and
justify, but motivating emotion.
Scott Adams, philosopher and expert on persuasion helped shape those views,
and this article is based on several of his brilliant ideas. I'm here on
the shoulders of this intellectual giant (and others).
Reason and logic are male
Although the reason, common sense and logic are the capital that men used
to drive civilization forward, to bring us to the moon, and to heal all
sorts of ailments and diseases, they are ineffective when are used to
communicate to the general masses, and those of lower intelligence.
This is especially the case when it comes to women. Dr. Jordan Peterson
surgically extrapolated the consequences of our historical gender roles
have affected our political values and the way we view reality. Where men
have pushed each other to explore, to produce, to invent, to protect and
build, women were responsible for the distribution of resources through
the "group". As such, in the minds of women, equality and equity outweigh
conscientious virtues associated with male output (which are much more
dependent done).
Fairness and equality are emotionally driven, but the efforts of men of the
production and gathering of resources require a hard realism. Our male
ancestors needed to repel vicious predators for resources. They needed to
go, to lift and to develop strategies to protect their women and children
items and barbarian armies. These efforts are not emotionally bound. They
depend on the intelligence, reason and pragmatism.
Why President Trump is a monster to the left
For these reasons, many women left, and their views President Trump beta
male orbiters, effeminate so differently than male men. Where masculine men
(as readers of this blog) see a great builder, a brilliant and persuade a
man motivated by pragmatic common sense (ie build a wall to keep illegal
migrants), the women left seen as a monster that threatens their ability to
redistribute resources to those who are "vulnerable" and "oppressed".
Evangelizing the left and bring it out of its collective madness, we will
adopt this message centered emotionally. This is the only way to reach the
hearts and minds of those leads equality, culturally suicidal modern women.
Let me be clear. We will remain firm and steadfast in our views. But our
message will have to change and evolve, if we want to survive the impending
feminist dark ages, and continue to build this movement.
Our enemies use nuclear weapons while we use swords
For if we grope in the manosphere with facts and figures, using the
masculine virtues of reason and logic, our enemies in the radical left
social justice and their allies Alphabet Soup Nazi (LGBTQRSTUV etc ..)
deploy methods that are far superior - they appeal to the emotions and
feelings of the masses, even if those calls are devoid of truth and
reality. And the left, eat with the same vigor as solid play comes on a
young woman with "Daddy Issues".
These truths were also exposed by veterans of the game, but in a different
context. Too often we men, especially those who have IQ above average,
reason and logic, so that we are powerless fact, unable to communicate and
speak an emotional language, less intelligent than women understand and so
desperately desire.
At that time feminized history (maybe the first), where many men have
adopted a perspective based on equity centered women, we must redirect our
powers of seduction to seduce the masses to adopt our political views.
As "game", political seduction will be a continuing focus on emotionally.
We will need to taunt and titillate our ideas in the spirit of collective
time and slowly and vigorously push and penetrate our dogma in the female
sphere, so that our superior seed survival and self-preservation bring us a
new offspring more male political, sane.
Where once we relied on moral arguments, pragmatic, we must develop them
into views based on emotions that appeal to fairness and equality.
Example 1 & # 8211; Abortion should be illegal
Let us examine how it might play in a pro-life / anti-abortion argument:
While I, and many here condemn abortion for moral depravity, and the harsh
reality that destroys the demographic continuity and eliminates a woman's
sense of self-responsibility, emotional argument based / equity talked to a
leftist look like this: Why is it fair for you to kill the fetus that would
turn into human beings, so that you were able to survive in such a
situation and become a human being?
Example 2 & # 8211; The West should avoid importing massive amounts of & #
8221 refugees;
Another example refers to the mass migration of alien hordes. The
manosphere argument looks like this: it is wrong to import massive amounts
of people with lower values than us because they can not integrate with
the rest of society, causing social chaos (Exhibit A - Eastern
Europe 'Where is). This makes sense for moral reasons and common sensical.
An emotional argument based / equity looks like this: allow mass migration
is not fair to the people of the working class, which will bear the brunt
of the adverse effects of migration patterns.
If left counters with their relativistic nonsense and say that these
migrants will not be pressure on social resources, but an advantage
(because "diversity is our strength"), the other argument would be: migrant
mass import is unfair since it is spoiler and predator. We must stop
bombarding Westerner their homeland and move, sending them on dangerous
journeys where they put in serious danger of death. It is unfair to those
developing countries which we then tear their young men and women, causing
demographic imbalances for them.
These arguments are not morally or pragmatically oriented. They are lower
because they are motivated by fairness and equality, but the conclusion is
the same - abortion should be illegal / foreign migrants should not be
imported en masse to the West. To evangelize and spread the gospel of red
pill, we must begin to appeal to the emotions of the left.
Know your audience
Back to my biography, I write these things because they are designed to
invigorate and inspire you & # 8211; my fellow dissidents & # 8211; so that
together we can get western countries. My prose changes depending on the
audience I am addressing.
On our quest to recover the western land then we will need to win the
hearts and minds of the masses, speaking their language, by appealing to
their emotions and their sense of fairness and equality. We must change our
prose accordingly. While alien hordes knocking at our doors, our seduction
skills can very well save our societies. For us to survive, we must seduce,
charm, manipulate and enchant the voter.
Only then can we raise our movement basement, into the mainstream, where we
will achieve great victories for Christianity, for freedom and truth. We
will protect our women, we will defend our brothers, and we will defeat the
enemies that torment us Mundialist like demons.
Learn more: The US government will Delaying Full Backs and War Project for
Women
No comments:
Post a Comment