For years, a meme has been promoted by the Liberal occupant institution who
pretend to be "political scientists" liberals care about equity, while the
value of conservative authority and purity. At first glance, the idea seems
only the Liberals and Conservatives are different political tribes, who
love and value different things.
The meme, however, an important implicit content. It could be summarized
as: the Liberals are enlightened, aware of universal values, a wider range
of feelings and experience, and are more "human". They are more intelligent
and more fully human. Conservatives, on the other hand, are limited, more
partial, more selfish and less intelligent. Strangely, the Liberals have no
problem using the IQ scores and SAT to throw as superior as they have spent
decades screaming at them and partly outside the law when they reported
racial differences.
The meme was repeated countless times on institutional markets. MSM output
used to dwell on how to handle the Trump voters by espousing liberal
sympathies through a story supposed to take their moral preferences into
account. There are studies that support the idea, but they are mostly, if
not only established by liberals who run their respondents where they want
by asking intelligent questions. The idea goes completely in the direction
of liberal ideas in general, the worldview and value judgment: it is too
perfect to be true liberal.
The Liberals care more about justice and equity?
First, what is justice? In the academic world, Plato or Aristotle classic
answers are most often seen as a step before entering the modern leftist
responses, mainly inspired by utilitarianism and John Rawls. They are
nestled in the ordinary narrative. Utilitarianism goes with an abstract
view, rootless individuals, is used as an excuse to managerialism & # 8212;
large calculators are supposed to know how you can contribute to
the "greater good" more than you & # 8212; and "widening circle" & # 8212;
remodel your identity and social norms that you like it or not.
Allegedly against utilitarianism, we can find moral theory of John Rawls,
which uses a different procedure, but also goes well as abstract
individuals and special policies for the one who gets recognized
as "unprivileged. "As for the virtues, well, the fact that the ancient
Greeks all agree how they were vital for morality and politics, they are
hardly considered perhaps aside to facilitate the deployment of modern
leftist theories.
Whether you choose "socialist Aristotelian" with (((Martha
Nussbaum))), "anti-specist" & # 8212; a fancy word for vegetarian & # 8212;
Utilitarianism (((Peter Singer))), or other brands available officially
accept all the dogmas themselves from the start and lead to the same
conclusions. Namely, to "social justice" as the left the appropriate
concept to a position that goes well with well-goodism liberal and
pro- "minority" position.
Behind the brands, "justice" in academia SJW-fly means pushing their story,
in addition to the dispossessed majority, excluding and disenfranchising he
always rewrite history so that our ancestors who built created and
supported almost everything in the West are as wicked CAST omitted as
creators or reformulated as mere predecessors leftism.
Of course, the abstract theories apparently riddled vernacular of justice
that are taught in academia are never faced with the reality outside the
narrative. reality says that evoked by omissions and distortions. When they
are difficult to make, the reality is dismissed as their "world view" & #
8212; Non-leftists are true other these days & # 8212; reduced to
ridiculous theories. If you want to "explain voting Trump," why not just
ask voters?
Many whites have noticed how they were made to work more for less, emptying
into a tedious contest that was designed for them to lose, and were
detested by "minorities" unless they were SJWs them- same. This observation
is very common among people who see beyond the blue pill.
The former workers, old good boys, legitimate heirs of Western
civilization ... are denied, defamed and confused. At the same time, will
be able minoritists urban cultish, MSM conducted in their hysteria, Hillary
has clearly demonstrated how greedy and reckless it was, and the rich, the
powerful liberal boast to run or change the world, not least . Where are
here justice or fairness?
Theories seem simple tools in their deadly power games. For information on
justice, throw John Stuart Mill, Rawls and all the literature of the
official side garbage & # 8212; read Plato and Aristotle instead.
Liberals are more sympathetic?
Leftists want much to believe. They present themselves as caring for
victims at the fashion of the day and love to show how "the rich"
egocentric, how Patriarchs "repressive" were, or how "autistic" alt law
would. Curiously, they have no problem of people who were born with autism
stigmatizing, and do without mocking the-decade Barron Trump to celebrate
the icon was Aspie Mark Zuckerberg if they are called for their hardness.
Liberals can sometimes be really nice, but sympathy is by no means
universal or based on explicit rules. The so-called bleeding hearts have a
very selective and arbitrary policy. I remember a time when Che was cool
and South America fashionable, because of all the revolutionaries there,
but now everything has fallen fashion and I know bohemian bourgeois who
despise poor and middle classes in southern Mexico.
Liberals "love" Women and unwomanly no problem with pushy propelled tell
people to vote simply because they have a vagina, but who choose, for
example, Le Pen does not represent women from feminism. The Liberals grant
pussy passes, but hurt their own children because they see them as too
white, "privileged" or guilty of being born with balls.
The same madness is in girls screaming for their "right" to kill their own
children forcefully using taxpayers or those women who, instead of being
loving and kind wishes as their own, turned into self-centered capitalist
who manage their capital. Ayn Rand would not have gone so far in his lack
of goodness.
On the other hand, only dissidents who does wrong in the system, kindness
and warmness towards the dreaded white-male-cishet it and. And we know the
hypocritical authority leftist, carefree, double sided. No, the Liberals
are certainly neither outside nor sympathetic care of their own signaling
performances under. If they had a heart, they care about us instead of
giving passes to the invaders and criminals.
Do the Conservatives care more about loyalty?
Plausibly, the two alleged political tribes are loyal but not the same
things. The Liberals have a sense of loyalty and identification with their
own party, the "cultural" institutions they took, their ideology, their
networks. Confuse their own minoritists with these social groups claim to
represent, they often accused of "false consciousness" or stupidity by
those who belong to these categories who still refuse minoritarians of
worship.
There are also many liberal hostility to those who were once liberals then
joined a non liberal party & # 8212; no matter how obeying leftist party is
actually & # 8212; or took their independence. As a friend of mine once
said, left looking for traitors while the court converts right.
Conservatives, of course, have their sense of loyalty too. In a normal
society, it should be a quality, not a euphemism for "ha, you chauvinist
less! "However, I argue that the truly pro-social conservatives should feel
loyalty to something other than the founding fathers, a flag that separates
them from other whites, alleged rights or fuzzy values.
In addition, more than a few conservatives have a real loyalty to leftist
values, which is why they make these ridiculous efforts to comply with the
requirements of "minorities" and suffer when tagged "racist" They really
want to be "racist" but considered respectable by controlling left culture.
Ultimately, the Conservatives must understand that the pseudo-left values
were designed to deprive them of their rights, or they will cucks
domineering worshiper.
Does anyone still cares about individual rights?
Some libertarians scattered between conservative niches and corners of the
Internet, are still. Others understood that the same frame abstract
individuals and rights is a fiction and that what is happening is something
else: a battle between two great powers, the left of the control system
that is radicalized while time, and we the people who fight for survival
against the hydra.
abstract individualism has always been used for political purposes and #
8212; destroying throne and altar in the eighteenth century, misandric,
phobic family "social justice" anti-white now. True Selves always come from
individual families, have a particular temperament, sex, race, and at least
for some particular purpose.
"Rights" granted to people no matter who and what they are more absurd than
an ideal, and the left claiming stopped believing in that it worked
tirelessly to deny us straight. Believing the hydra must be tolerated or
kept alive because "freedom of expression" seems misplaced loyalty and
idiocy. Fortunately, the alternative space pushed well beyond this obsolete
regime.
The opposite poles have changed
"Yes, we're all about the care and equity, only the Conservatives are all
about authority. Now SHUT UP AND RESPECT MY AUTHORITY! "
Thomas Sowell famous theorized that the Liberals had an "unconstrained"
more realistic but also more creative and more capable of perceiving
potential, while the Conservatives would be "forced", thus safer, but more
limited. Now what we are going through is the opposite.
The Liberals have stiffened in their own anti-radicalization white,
anti-male. Many of them have become unable to think of their SJW box,
spouting pseudo-sophisticated giggles wherever they go, and drown in
hysteria if their claim is exposed. We, on the other hand benefited from
being deprived of the Democrats cucks rub it, and having much less to lose
or fear, we could pass the walls designed leftist.
We are on the side of potential, creativity, experimentation. We have ways
and much less firepower than the Liberals because they are the system. We
are also those that Liberals should consider upgrading least & # 8212; not
more & # 8212; authority, as they pretend to cultural and normative
authority and can not withstand serious criticism.
Justice is ours. Equity is ours. "Social justice," as they came to use it
is a monstrous illusion, an ideological baton of origin of pure will to
destroy the creators and followers of western civilization.
The Liberals have impressive intellectual and meta-political history, while
recognizing the second aspect already implies a critical perspective of
their dogma that equal drift to the left "progress." Yet they are
compromised by arrogance, hysteria, ideological rigidity and intolerance,
and denying the realities of tens of millions of westerns spend a day. We
can rely both on the principle of reality and creativity to return all
their empty talking points of meaning and expose them.
Read more: 5 steps cultural leftists Where zero is assumed responsibility
for their choices
No comments:
Post a Comment