Since Laura Loomer rushed the stage of New York's interpretation of Jules
César by the theater group "Shakespeare in the Park", the various factions
of the political right have been debating the merits of giving taste his
own political medicine left. Of course, the "respectable" conservatives
decried the use of any tit-for-tat strategy. However, many members of the
right disk applauded this approach. And other members of the right fell
somewhere between these two views.
Personally, I support the idea of using the tactics of the left against.
In my article ROK "The argument for the tactical use of the left against
the left", I argued that the use of tactics of the left against them in
proportion, and when done in response to these tactics is a perfectly moral
strategy given our current state of war culture with the left.
I also noted that, as a policeman is perfectly moral when it responds
proportionately and reasonably to a threat, even if it can use the same
tactics as the threat uses, it is also perfectly moral right policy using
tactics left against them, as the response of the law is proportionate and
reasonable.
But with the point above have already argued, the question that must be
addressed is this: can a systematic method or system be created to
determine when and how the political right should use the tactics of the
left against them? And in fact there is such a system, and inspiration also
comes from the world of the police.
The use of Continuum strength
Within the law enforcement community, the modern police teach their
officers called a continuum use of force. It is a concept that aims to
provide the police a systematic way and to apply their standard tactical
use of force in a given situation. And this concept is essentially teaches
that a police officer is justified in a clean mirror about level of force,
as the actions of the agent are basically in response to the threat against
him and are proportionate to this threat .
If a topic is beginning to show clear signs it is about to use deadly force
against a police officer, or if the subject is already trying to use lethal
force, the agent can respond to the threat with deadly force. But if a
subject is simply engaged in a verbal argument with a police officer, then,
of course, the police officer can not respond to legitimate this with
deadly force.
The use continuum of strength teaches police officer when they can
legitimately use violent tactics against a subject as well as what type of
violent tactics can be used when.
Just as the police use of force continuum to help guide their actions, I
propose that the political-right continuum adopt a "use of force" cultural
guide to help them in their cultural conflict with the political left. Such
a tool would help people right know when they can use certain tactics
cultural war as well as understand what tactics they can legitimately use
in response to attacks from the left.
What this cultural continuum "the use of force" look like?
First, it is quite clear that any tactic "intolerant" used by the political
right would be used in response to the use of such tactics left. This does
not mean that such a tactic could be used preventively, but it would mean
that there would have to be clear signs and unequivocally visible to a
reasonable person that the political left would use such tactics before the
law responded in kind.
It would be the same way that a police officer can become physically
aggressive with a subject as long as the subject shows clear signs that he
was about to be aggressive, like clenching his fists and jaw , posturing,
arming his fists to punch, and so on.
Note also that for the political right to be strategically sensitive does
not mean it should be defensive in a tactical sense; rather, it means that
the political right should follow the maxim of never starting anything, but
always finish everything. And to do this, an offensive tactic attitude is
an absolute must!
Then, in terms of its approach, cultural continuum "use of force" teach the
political right to reflect what the political left did. So if the political
left remains civil, engaged in the debate, and maintains their protests
within the law, the political right would limit its tactics in the same
activities. However, if the political left (or part of the political left)
begins to engage in illegal activities and intolerant and events, the
political right may respond to similar tactics, at least to target parts of
the political left are the .
Of course, this does not mean that the political right has necessarily use
such tactics in response to the left if it is not strategically
advantageous to do so, but it means that such tactics could be used if it
is in the interest of the political right to use them.
Finally, if the Left decides to engage in actual violence against members
of the political right, the political right can always respond in
self-defense against such an attack until the physical threat was arrested.
And if the threat does not stop, other measures such as pushing for
secession, the next step is to use.
The morality of the cultural life of use of Continuum strength
It should be noted that this use to the cultural continuum strength is not
only a rational strategy for the political right to adopt, but it is also a
perfectly legal strategy and ethics as well. For, remember that both
criminal use and a policeman violence as a tactic to achieve their ends.
However, a criminal uses violence for personal and disrupt social
stability; However, a police officer who is also called a peace officer
ideally uses violence for the benefit of society and as a way to restore
peace in society.
The policeman and the criminal are completely different from the moral
point of view, even though both use the same tactic; and they differ
precisely because their reasons and the ultimate purpose to use the tactics
of violence are different. Indeed, the police officer does not become a
criminal simply because it uses violence as a criminal act.
Similarly, a person on the political right does not become a leftist simply
because, in response to the left, right, uses most often associated with
the political left tactics. After all, because of the political right and
the ultimate end to the use of such tactics are different from the left.
The political left uses tactics such as intolerant stop down and attacked
the speakers on the right in politics to gain power and undermine the ideas
that they are opposed to without debate.
However, if the political right decides to start using the same kind of
intolerant tactics against the political left, it is to teach a political
lesson left in the only way that the left learns: namely, experience
painful. It is also pushing the political left in a position where they
start again to respect freedom of expression and civil debate. So even if
the tactics could be the same, there is no moral equivalence between the
left and right because the reasons for using these tactics are completely
different.
In addition, the minute the left stop using such tactics, the law will stop
as well. However, the reverse is not the case. And it is an essential
difference as well.
Is there a chance that, in response to the political use of their right
tactics, the political left will accentuate their own tactics? Of course
there is a chance of that happening. But the political left will not stop
the escalation of their tactics simply because the political right asked
to. After all, the Conservatives were politely "respectable" asking the
left to stop using such tactics in the past twelve years, and during that
time, the political left has culturally steam-rolled over the
conservatives. They also continued to use their intolerant tactics with
impunity wherever they hold power, such as in academia.
Conclusion
Ultimately, if the only option is to continue to lose the political left or
use the tactics of the political left against them, the choice is obvious.
After all, while it may be unpleasant to use such tactics to the limited
time that is needed to push the political Left, the fact is that the loss
of the political left is infinitely worse than just using such tactics.
Thus, in order to use these tactics in a reasonable and legitimate way, I
suggest that the policy adopted right idea of a cultural continuum "the
use of force" to do help to ensure that all tactics used by the political
right are fully commensurate with the tactics used against them. And that
not only help the right to win the cultural war, but it will also help win
the hearts and minds of the average citizen as well.
Read more: Tactics for war against cultural Marxism in 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment