Much has been written about the strange bedfellows of the official left.
What unites feminists, Islamists, anarchists, Bernie-bros, LGBTQ + rioters
BLM and Hillary voters often seems to be a bit more than the rebellious
hatred for Western civilization. However, it still does not explain what
motivates their backers higher level land. What causes the & # 8212; most
white men & # 8212; Presidents and Western executives, elite companies to
financially support the people who would be happy to see them hanged in the
streets?
The short answer is a deadly combination of greed and signs of virtue,
exacerbated by a small cohort of anti-white agitators. Although this is a
varied and complex issue, for simplicity's good this article will focus
only on the effects this has on immigration policy.
Quite tellingly, the entire left and most of the right to assume that mass
immigration is not only good, but necessary. Diversity is, after all, our
strength, and every year the leaders of politicians, through the American
open-border funds and organizations in Europe, and media conglomerates to
the tune of billions. Why do they do this? What makes most elite companies
support mass immigration?
1. Cheap Labor
The first reason is cheap labor. In the first world, labor is expensive.
This is not because Western workers are spoiled, but rather because the
costs of living are significantly higher. We have an industrialized
economy, massive infrastructure and a modern education system. This makes
all the West a great place to do business, but as a corollary Westerners
can demand a higher price for their work.
But if companies could win all the advantages of the Western world
infrastructure and institutions without paying the salaries of the first
world? In the past, this has been partially achieved through outsourcing
and offshoring. However, these plans entail costs of their own, which often
requires bribes to foreign governments and installation of roads and other
infrastructure. All this is expensive and raises the question: why trouble
getting the factories of the Third World where you can bring the third
world factories? After all, people are cheaper to ship than tons of steel
and concrete.
The mass immigration sidestep all the questions associated with pesky third
worlders employment in their country of origin. It combines the advantages
of cheap labor with comfortable home infrastructure. For example, if the
air carrier settled the 21 million people of Sri Lanka directly in downtown
Indianapolis, they could pay their first assembly line workers thirty cents
a day, without the disadvantages of building a plant halfway around the
world.
It does not take an MBA to see the serious benefits to the bottom line. An
extreme example to be sure, but it illustrates the first major incentive
driving pro-immigration frameworks: the prospect of a third world wages
here at home.
2. More Consumers
The second and perhaps more insidious because companies support mass
immigration is to inflate consumption. Capital is always looking for new
markets, but to invest and develop foreign markets can be risky and
expensive. The solution: put all here. Instead of waiting for the Third
World to develop, elites can create first consumers in the world overnight
by importing Third World populations to western countries. The entire
development project can be skipped with a speed boat or airplane trip.
Needless to say that the Angolan people will be much better placed to take
car loans and buy cell phone plans once every 25 million of them have been
safely relocated to Denmark.
Similarly, only 7% of Burkina Faso Africans have reliable access to
electricity; a technicality development significantly reducing their
ability to order cheap trinkets, plastic off Amazon.com. If we all fly in
America, Amazon won t have to wait for the National Company of Burkina
Faso's power to get his shit together. These newcomers can afford world's
first consumer habits is inconsequential. Taxpayers native whites provide
the difference by the welfare state. Anything less would be racism.
Seriously, what the circumstances actually represent the citizens of Europe
and America is forced & # 8212; by taxation & # 8212; to subsidize
corporate profits by financing the very people that are imported to replace
them. An objection has been decried as racism or xenophobia, and so the
process continued unabated.
Banks and Western companies generate a base for their loans growing
consumer credit cards and electronic siphoning excess fertility Third
World. The effects of this process on the life, communities and the ancient
cultures of the West were considered acceptable collateral damage.
3. Cheap Virtue-Signaling
The last reason is the double benefit provided under the signaling. On the
one hand, signaling under open border allows managers to market their
companies as somehow more moral than their competitors. Commercial
Superbowl 84 Lumber a memorable example of this ploy. At the same time, by
allowing them to meet their own personal needs to feel like good people.
Also, I think the support leftist shibboleths & # 8212 without controversy,
as open borders and # 8212; is a kind of social currency among the elite,
where they compete with each other on who can write the biggest check and
make the loudest proselytizing.
Interestingly, I suspect that you also had to deal with one of them on the
horror that their philanthropy inevitably occurs, you probably meet their
real shock and disbelief. Their worldviews are formed by sugar-coated
stories presented to galas and fundraisers for the rich NGOs such as the
International Rescue Committee (IRC). In the following IRC propaganda
piece, refugees are presented as aspiring lawyers and gregarious old kite
Muslim leaders. Young hordes, male economic migrants are strangely absent.
They see this:
Not that:
The reality, it seems, is a minor distraction from the feeling of wellbeing
echo chambers where the elite come to play to be virtuous & # 8216;
citizens of the world & # 8217; and keep their business profits too.
Conclusion
It is this last reason & # 8212; Under signaling & # 8212; that most are
blaming our elites. It is one thing to knowingly a great evil. It is quite
another to convince you that you are good to do.
Despite a career spent singing the praises of open-borders, in their
personal lives elites distance themselves as much as possible of the
diversity they claim to love. The hypocrisy is mind-numbing. By dint of
their enormous wealth they will never live in ghettos, favelas and budding
prohibited areas in the West. Their children will not go to school equipped
with metal detectors and knives rods. They will never wait in line at
7-Eleven behind a sullen Salvadoran draped in MS-13 tattoos. Most of them
live their entire lives without ever having to face once, publicly or
privately, the abhorrent reality of their betrayal.
Prepare for enrichment & # 8230;
I do not see our elites stop this madness of their own accord. They will
probably double to the bitter end. The only thing standing between them and
the total destruction of the Western world are some of us who know the
score. We do not have billions in corporate finance, but the truth is on
our side, and we will not allow the West down without a fight.
Read more: How to mass immigration is driven by consumerism and low
fertility woman
No comments:
Post a Comment