Sunday, July 23, 2017

4 Strategies leftist law should Emulate

leftist ideology is bankrupt for some time now. Things seriously taken a
wrong turn with Karl Marx. Even moderate liberalism hasn t had much to say
about the last fifty years, as the negative outweigh the positives. Despite
all this, some of their strategies are on track.
Planning ahead
 Mr. Alinsky, I m your number one fan. Can t wait for your new book! I want
to be like you someday. XOXOXO Hillary
Even when leftists aren t to power, they're actively planning how to get
there. Thereafter, they understand how to maintain control. I must admit
that some of their plans were bright enough, even if they subsequently didn
t work so well.
For some examples, consider Lenin's revolutionary 1902 plan What to do? The
Bolsheviks started here from the ground floor, and fifteen years later,
they resumed the largest country in the world. During the 1930s, Max
Horkheimer and the Frankfurt school buddies have developed cultural
Marxism; in time it spread in all universities and strongly influenced the
1960s against-culture.
Also during the 1960s, Democrats have introduced major changes in US
federal law that created blocks of voters for taxpayers. Although the
Soviet Union fell, Western progressivism took a life. Lite communism became
orthodoxy PC, assuming almost religious dimensions despite being a complete
nonsense.
Of course, the world would be better if the leftists have made much effort
to determine the things that actually work to improve society. Fortunately,
our work is quite simple; we don not need to develop radical political and
untested, or even do much theorizing. We can go far enough by simply notice
how the left's policies have failed, and (when we're able to) replace them
with what worked in the past. Until then, we should start planning the road
to victory.
Finally, the leftist narratives spinning. In fact, their policies and
dysfunctional behavior, they've delivered to us a truck full of rhetorical
ammunition. We must continue to discredit them mercilessly. For example,
imagine the results if the public understood what feminism really was and
how they've recognized the company sank. Their fate is already fading; s we
keep this stamping & # 8212; and other leftists stories & # 8212 hazelnut,
soil.
Moreover, media control over the information has been seriously questioned.
We can do our part as an individual in helping the Red Pill public. By
striking the iron is hot, we can reach a critical mass. After that great
opportunities are at hand.
We have to make other plans as well, to manage all the possible
contingencies that might develop along the way. Some examples include
censorship (especially in Europe), political violence directed against us
(the Antifags, among others), government repression (like domestic spying),
or political settlement to launch the bone, but change nothing public
(Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merkel, etc.) For too long the law has been
on the defensive; with proper planning, we can change that.
Unit

In many ways, the radical left is much more diverse than the right
alternative. Some leftist alliances make no ideological sense, and the only
goal is to build a coalition opposed to Western civilization. There are
widely conflicting objectives on the left. Smoldering resentments sometimes
reach the surface, but most of the time they're managing to keep everyone
at the same rate.
Sometimes it is quite ridiculous, but they don t care. For example, some
comfortable feminists to radical Islam, despite the highly regressive
nature of Sharia. Sometimes these stupid people even say that wearing a
ninja costume is release & # 8221;. It'll be a disaster for feminists if
they try to jihadists responsible care for them, but that doesn t bother
either.
On the right side, things were much more fragmented for centuries.
Unfortunately, Caesars chair are partially at fault. I'll just say that
those who dream of recognition should win. The left certainly has its share
Lenins chair, but we don t have time to waste with big egos and big talkers.
Further fragmentation of ideological disagreements. Certainly, there are
real questions about where we want to go that will eventually be resolved.
The good news is that the right alternative isn t purely reactionary as
some believe, or related to the dogmatic theory; we re interested
pragmatically in what will be best for our people.
In any event, small quarrels aren t constructive. We must let our factions
develop naturally and keep sniping at minimum. Those with the best ideas
will come out before. Let's save our rhetorical firepower for the leftist
whose misguided and malevolent policies often harm society.
This includes avoiding statements as I am not an extremist, contrary to
what some guy on my right & # 8221. The Republicans have fallen for it
again and again. This greatly limits their effectiveness and aid leftist
salami slicing & # 8221; tactical.
Consequently, t the traditional conservative discourse ISN led astray an
inch outside the Overton Window respectable & # 8221; opinion. (Who will
define what is common and respectable? Think about it.) When liberals have
never rushed to denounce one of their own for ideological heresy, or even
being too chummy with the radicals (like Saul Alinsky and Bill Ayers ) or
make friends with foreign dictators (like Fidel Castro and Muammar Kadhafi)?
In all, not everyone on our side will see things the same way. constructive
debate and even limited criticism aren t bad. Yet, we must seek to not have
enemies on the right. For example, some might see the alt alt Lite right
against schism as separate the wheat from the chaff, but we d be better
against our common enemies to be happy to censor us.
If from the beginning we struggled with against our real enemies as much as
we were fighting each other, we d be much closer to the finish line. For
these reasons, we should focus on commonalities, and beware of purity
spirals & # 8221;. Never let the best is the enemy of the good.
Networking
 The undisciplined peasants criticize my policies, Zuckie! Do they think
it's a free country or something & # 8221 ?; Don worry, Angie; they know
too, so we'll shut down & # 8221.
Remarkably, meteorologists had links with dozens of radical organizations
(communists and others), not only in the US but in many countries abroad.
This allowed for joint operations, and they were even invited to a
conference in Havana. How does fugitives holed up in a squalid hideout
after another, do all this?
They were especially active during the 1970s, when they had to rely on pay
telephone, mail, and private conversation. It's not known exactly how they
have acquired and maintain all contacts (although I have some ideas), but
they were remarkably successful at it.
We should organize and build our contacts too. It is very easy, because Al
Gore invented the series of tubes we call Interwebs. Not only will this
help our short-term efforts, networking is an important part of how things
are done in politics. This has a greater role in history than most people
suspect, personal friendships with globalist dark clubs.
Activism
More fun than going to the gym
I'll have to credit leftists to be very highly motivated. moderate
conservatives are too often Joe Sixpack kinds, hoping that everything will
be peachy once their candidate is elected and cleans the house. (Maybe take
a more active role towards the development of their fate might might be
prudent?) Meanwhile, even the moderate liberals are often involved in
protests and other activism.
Rightists tend to be more concerned with self-improvement, careers, and
social lives. Indeed, some leftists have some free time on their hands. We
will fill the gap by using our time wisely. Every day we have to do
something to advance our cause, even just a conversation to brighten
someone.
Another thing that holds us back is fear. Many are afraid of what their
friends might think, or their employers, etc. A friend who does Tolerate
difference of opinion isn t much of a friend, and an employer shouldn t Pry
in employee privacy, but those are legitimate concerns. Nevertheless, we
have to take calculated risks; the stakes are too high to comply with the
little tyranny.
Read more: The argument for adopting the tactics of the left to defeat the
left

No comments: