Many fitness acolytes, having achieved good results in the first months of
their training, will seek to use new exercises and equipment to gain a
competitive advantage over their amateur gym mates. Or, some of our young
players went in search of food in the storage rooms of their school gyms
seeking that goal. Anyway, at some point in a physical bodybuilder's career
& # 8221; they will find many mysterious exercise machines that are
completely obtuse to them, mind boggling that the way they are supposed to
be used, and what purpose.
You probably do not need me to tell you, but the majority of exercise
equipment that are on the market today are completely worthless & # 8212;
in fact, I told you! However, there are some devices that are somewhat
obscure and rarely used, but are excellent tools for your strength,
endurance and flexibility training, tools that, without exception, are 100
years younger and their which have unfortunately been forgotten by the
masses for a variety of reasons completely inept (marketing, for most, but
here the return of kings are already against consumer culture if marketing
has no effect on me). And without further ado & # 8230;
1. The Swedish scale
Most likely a device you saw bolted to the back of your high school gym
class, the Swedish scale at first glance seems to be closer to some kind of
torture device than a piece of exercise equipment ( insert joke about hacky
derp any exercise is a torture device here). And indeed, to try it, n t
seem to be useful for much more than to use it as a ladder.
However, a little ingenuity will show that it is useful for all
calisthenics exercise that requires a certain degree of verticality. You
can put your stomach at the bar to stretch your back, or turn your back to
the bar to do pull-ups and L-SITS. The regular gradations bars make it a
must for the graduated sections as wushu stretchkick handstands and belly
wall, and it can also be used to free training suspension exercises such as
the lever and the human flag.
2. Indian Clubs
For better or for worse associated with the golden age, they are, as the
name suggests, an import from the subcontinent. , They are basically a
dumbbell which is stretched, forcing the wrists and shoulders to act as a
lever to support the weight. In practice, this makes the bumper moldings
and other exercises you do with clubs much harder than they would with a
standard dumbbell.
There are a variety of exercises that is * only * with the Indian team, and
all are great ways to develop strength and healthy joints in the upper body
(and subject of articles that I should never get hold of a set). I
personally like more kettlebells, which is unfortunate, because they are
much more common. If you find a set of Indian clubs, be sure to use them.
3. Medicine Balls
Let's make something clear: I'm not talking large inflatable bouncy & #
8221 of exercise balls; that middle-aged ladies use to exercise. Instead, I
talk about the medicine ball, a ball that weighs somewhere between 2-50
pounds and can be used for various purposes, ranging from unstable support
for transient progressions calisthenics to throw and catch off the wall to
form the chest and abdominal muscles for an impact to hang. It can also be
used as a weight shifts as the weighted sit-up if you do not want to risk
damaging your floor.
This piece of equipment has been around for most of three millennia, and
served all the gladiators to the pioneers of the 19th century physical
culture. It would be interesting to add to your repertoire.
4. gymnastic rings
Most people probably have some sort of idea of how this work, if only to
watch the Olympics every four years. However, the layman can use these
tools difficult but rewarding for their own physical condition.
The mere fact of doing standard exercises calisthenics (L-Sit, pull-up,
etc.) is exponentially more difficult by the fact of making these on the
unstable surface of the rings. And open space between the rings facilitates
more complex maneuvers such as handstand ring, which leads to even more
difficult technical callisthénie as ring handstand pushup, all form the
entire body to a huge degree and optionally a lead Maneuver monstrous
difficult such as iron cross.
5. Parallettes
Probably the simplest of these obscure drive devices, parallettes are
simply a bar and the platform placed on the ground. However, they are an
integral part of the training gym because of the elevation of the body on
the ground, making them essential for the sitting-v-seat, pulls true
handstand (elevation allows you to dive deeper than you would on the
ground), and other maneuvers. The boxes or chairs can be replaced by them,
grasp the bar only works different muscles of the hand and forearm of a
flat hand.
So next time you see one of them, give them a try, it might give you that
edge you need.
More: 5 Preparation Tips for ever better Workouts
Sunday, April 30, 2017
5 mysterious drive devices you have met in the gym
Many fitness acolytes, having achieved good results in the first months of
their training, will seek to use new exercises and equipment to gain a
competitive advantage over their amateur gym mates. Or, some of our young
players went in search of food in the storage rooms of their school gyms
seeking that goal. Anyway, at some point in a physical bodybuilder's career
& # 8221; they will find many mysterious exercise machines that are
completely obtuse to them, mind boggling that the way they are supposed to
be used, and what purpose.
You probably do not need me to tell you, but the majority of exercise
equipment that are on the market today are completely worthless & # 8212;
in fact, I told you! However, there are some devices that are somewhat
obscure and rarely used, but are excellent tools for your strength,
endurance and flexibility training, tools that, without exception, are 100
years younger and their which have unfortunately been forgotten by the
masses for a variety of reasons completely inept (marketing, for most, but
here the return of kings are already against consumer culture if marketing
has no effect on me). And without further ado & # 8230;
1. The Swedish scale
Most likely a device you saw bolted to the back of your high school gym
class, the Swedish scale at first glance seems to be closer to some kind of
torture device than a piece of exercise equipment ( insert joke about hacky
derp any exercise is a torture device here). And indeed, to try it, n t
seem to be useful for much more than to use it as a ladder.
However, a little ingenuity will show that it is useful for all
calisthenics exercise that requires a certain degree of verticality. You
can put your stomach at the bar to stretch your back, or turn your back to
the bar to do pull-ups and L-SITS. The regular gradations bars make it a
must for the graduated sections as wushu stretchkick handstands and belly
wall, and it can also be used to free training suspension exercises such as
the lever and the human flag.
2. Indian Clubs
For better or for worse associated with the golden age, they are, as the
name suggests, an import from the subcontinent. , They are basically a
dumbbell which is stretched, forcing the wrists and shoulders to act as a
lever to support the weight. In practice, this makes the bumper moldings
and other exercises you do with clubs much harder than they would with a
standard dumbbell.
There are a variety of exercises that is * only * with the Indian team, and
all are great ways to develop strength and healthy joints in the upper body
(and subject of articles that I should never get hold of a set). I
personally like more kettlebells, which is unfortunate, because they are
much more common. If you find a set of Indian clubs, be sure to use them.
3. Medicine Balls
Let's make something clear: I'm not talking large inflatable bouncy & #
8221 of exercise balls; that middle-aged ladies use to exercise. Instead, I
talk about the medicine ball, a ball that weighs somewhere between 2-50
pounds and can be used for various purposes, ranging from unstable support
for transient progressions calisthenics to throw and catch off the wall to
form the chest and abdominal muscles for an impact to hang. It can also be
used as a weight shifts as the weighted sit-up if you do not want to risk
damaging your floor.
This piece of equipment has been around for most of three millennia, and
served all the gladiators to the pioneers of the 19th century physical
culture. It would be interesting to add to your repertoire.
4. gymnastic rings
Most people probably have some sort of idea of how this work, if only to
watch the Olympics every four years. However, the layman can use these
tools difficult but rewarding for their own physical condition.
The mere fact of doing standard exercises calisthenics (L-Sit, pull-up,
etc.) is exponentially more difficult by the fact of making these on the
unstable surface of the rings. And open space between the rings facilitates
more complex maneuvers such as handstand ring, which leads to even more
difficult technical callisthénie as ring handstand pushup, all form the
entire body to a huge degree and optionally a lead Maneuver monstrous
difficult such as iron cross.
5. Parallettes
Probably the simplest of these obscure drive devices, parallettes are
simply a bar and the platform placed on the ground. However, they are an
integral part of the training gym because of the elevation of the body on
the ground, making them essential for the sitting-v-seat, pulls true
handstand (elevation allows you to dive deeper than you would on the
ground), and other maneuvers. The boxes or chairs can be replaced by them,
grasp the bar only works different muscles of the hand and forearm of a
flat hand.
So next time you see one of them, give them a try, it might give you that
edge you need.
More: 5 Preparation Tips for ever better Workouts
their training, will seek to use new exercises and equipment to gain a
competitive advantage over their amateur gym mates. Or, some of our young
players went in search of food in the storage rooms of their school gyms
seeking that goal. Anyway, at some point in a physical bodybuilder's career
& # 8221; they will find many mysterious exercise machines that are
completely obtuse to them, mind boggling that the way they are supposed to
be used, and what purpose.
You probably do not need me to tell you, but the majority of exercise
equipment that are on the market today are completely worthless & # 8212;
in fact, I told you! However, there are some devices that are somewhat
obscure and rarely used, but are excellent tools for your strength,
endurance and flexibility training, tools that, without exception, are 100
years younger and their which have unfortunately been forgotten by the
masses for a variety of reasons completely inept (marketing, for most, but
here the return of kings are already against consumer culture if marketing
has no effect on me). And without further ado & # 8230;
1. The Swedish scale
Most likely a device you saw bolted to the back of your high school gym
class, the Swedish scale at first glance seems to be closer to some kind of
torture device than a piece of exercise equipment ( insert joke about hacky
derp any exercise is a torture device here). And indeed, to try it, n t
seem to be useful for much more than to use it as a ladder.
However, a little ingenuity will show that it is useful for all
calisthenics exercise that requires a certain degree of verticality. You
can put your stomach at the bar to stretch your back, or turn your back to
the bar to do pull-ups and L-SITS. The regular gradations bars make it a
must for the graduated sections as wushu stretchkick handstands and belly
wall, and it can also be used to free training suspension exercises such as
the lever and the human flag.
2. Indian Clubs
For better or for worse associated with the golden age, they are, as the
name suggests, an import from the subcontinent. , They are basically a
dumbbell which is stretched, forcing the wrists and shoulders to act as a
lever to support the weight. In practice, this makes the bumper moldings
and other exercises you do with clubs much harder than they would with a
standard dumbbell.
There are a variety of exercises that is * only * with the Indian team, and
all are great ways to develop strength and healthy joints in the upper body
(and subject of articles that I should never get hold of a set). I
personally like more kettlebells, which is unfortunate, because they are
much more common. If you find a set of Indian clubs, be sure to use them.
3. Medicine Balls
Let's make something clear: I'm not talking large inflatable bouncy & #
8221 of exercise balls; that middle-aged ladies use to exercise. Instead, I
talk about the medicine ball, a ball that weighs somewhere between 2-50
pounds and can be used for various purposes, ranging from unstable support
for transient progressions calisthenics to throw and catch off the wall to
form the chest and abdominal muscles for an impact to hang. It can also be
used as a weight shifts as the weighted sit-up if you do not want to risk
damaging your floor.
This piece of equipment has been around for most of three millennia, and
served all the gladiators to the pioneers of the 19th century physical
culture. It would be interesting to add to your repertoire.
4. gymnastic rings
Most people probably have some sort of idea of how this work, if only to
watch the Olympics every four years. However, the layman can use these
tools difficult but rewarding for their own physical condition.
The mere fact of doing standard exercises calisthenics (L-Sit, pull-up,
etc.) is exponentially more difficult by the fact of making these on the
unstable surface of the rings. And open space between the rings facilitates
more complex maneuvers such as handstand ring, which leads to even more
difficult technical callisthénie as ring handstand pushup, all form the
entire body to a huge degree and optionally a lead Maneuver monstrous
difficult such as iron cross.
5. Parallettes
Probably the simplest of these obscure drive devices, parallettes are
simply a bar and the platform placed on the ground. However, they are an
integral part of the training gym because of the elevation of the body on
the ground, making them essential for the sitting-v-seat, pulls true
handstand (elevation allows you to dive deeper than you would on the
ground), and other maneuvers. The boxes or chairs can be replaced by them,
grasp the bar only works different muscles of the hand and forearm of a
flat hand.
So next time you see one of them, give them a try, it might give you that
edge you need.
More: 5 Preparation Tips for ever better Workouts
How Robert Cialdini's Book "Pre-Suasion" Improved My Game
<Div> <img width = "494" height = "750" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg"
class = "attachment-afterimage Image size-post-wp-post-picture "alt
=" "srcset ="
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg
494w, http: //www.returnofkings .com / wp-content / uploads / 2017/04 /
10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-300x455.jpg 300w, 262w
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-262x398.jpg "sizes
=" (max-width: 494px) 100vw, 494px "/> </ div> <p> Countless
words-have-been written about the role of Attention whoring in the game
today. While this is considerable, it & # 8217; s worth paying attention to
the concept of Attention to Itself. SPECIFICALLY, it & # 8217; s worth
Noting how you can use it to <em> your </ em> advantage. Channeling your
focus Correctly is Perhaps the Most Powerful thing you can do, Especially
For your inner game. </ P>
<P> For starters, the Brain Evolved to square one extreme importance Those
Things Focuses it is. Robert Cialdini, the & # 8220; Godfather of
Influence, & # 8221; Says In His new book <a href="http://amzn.to/2qsaqKl">
<em> Pre-Suasion </ em> </a>: </ p>
<Blockquote> <p> Why do we assume Typically That whatever we are focusing
on in the moment is Especially important? One Reason Is That whatever it is
we are focusing significant Especially in the moment. It & # 8217; s only
reasonable to give Heightened Attention To Those factors That-have The Most
significance and utility for us in a Particular circumstances: a strange
noise in the dark, the smell of smoke in a theater, a luxury CEO to speak
<. / p>
<P> This responsive system of focusing our limited focus resources is what
does Indeed Possess special import HAS year imperfection, though: <u> we
Can Be Brought to the mistaken belief That something is significant Merely
Because We-have-been led by Some irrelevant factor Narrowed to give it our
attention. </ u> All Too Often, people believe That if They Have Attention
paid to an idea or event or group, it must be significant enough to warrant
the consideration. That & # 8217;. S not true </ p> </ blockquote>
<P> This is something Known As the & # 8220; & # 8221 focusing illusion.
Being aware of and compensating for this can make you a lot more confident,
productive and resilient. Though I & # 8217; ve stumbled onto this in my
experiences, Cialdini & # 8217; s words crystallized em for me, making the
distillation of experience into a productive system as possible. Here are a
Few Things I & # 8217; ve Learned about channeling focus to maximize your
life and for our purposes, your game. SPECIFICALLY, I & # 8217; m going to
talk about in this column approaching </ p>.
<P> <img class = "wp-image-alignnone 120294" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/focus.jpg" alt
= "" width = "485 "height =" 329 "srcset ="
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/focus.jpg 556w,
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/04 /
focus-300x203.jpg 300w, 262w
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/focus-262x178.jpg "sizes
=" (max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px "/> </ p>
<H3> <strong> The Approach </ strong> </ h3>
<P> For starters, I don & # 8217; t <a href
= "http://masculineepic.com/index.php/2017/03/22/stop-rating-girls-looks-on-the-1-10
-scale / "target =" _ blank "rel =" noopener noreferrer "> spleen girls on
the 1-10 scale. </a> it always Seemed like a roundabout, Unnecessary
exercise to me, drank more importantly than that, it might Actively harm
you. Why? Because a girl on the rating scale puts your Focus On That
rating. In <em> Pre-Suasion & # 8217; s </ em> second chapter, Cialdini
Discusses the concept of & # 8220;. & # 8221 target chuting; </ p>
<P> Suppose, for instance, That I-have the thankless job of trying to get
your information and signing for something on the street. You know how this
goes, you never stop Almost. Yet, that & # 8217; s Often Because The people
vying for your time you are priming in the wrong way. One group of people I
encounter a lot in my neighborhood (by the nearby campus of course) Asks me
& # 8220;? Do you have time for LGBT rights & # 8221; Note the value-taking
opener here. But, what if They Were to ask me if & # 8220;? I Was a helpful
person & # 8221; That Cialdini shows us this is what a pair of
communication scientists DID When experimenting to see what lines of
questioning to get people to stop and comply with survey requests in a
mall. They found That asking Their prospects: & # 8220; do you Consider
Yourself a helpful person & # 8221;? resulted in 77% of the people They
Asked stopping and cooperating with 'em. </ p>
<P> Why Was this? The answer is que la scientists elevated focus to the
concept of being white helpful INSTEAD of asking for Their prospects & #
8217; precious time. Most people want to think of Themselves as helpful,
and MOST people will-have memories of being white helpful. In effect, by
asking the question, you & # 8217; ve feel your prospect down a Targeted &
# 8220; & # 8221 fall; and Focused On That person & # 8217; s experiences.
In this time That Person will be much more receptive to aligned requests
(in this case, helping out with a survey or Even giving out personal
information), hence the title <em> Pre-Suasion </ em>. </ P>
<P> That was an admittedly roundabout explanation of & # 8220; chuting
target, & # 8221; goal there you have it. Getting back to my decision not
to rate girls on <a href
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/113147/its-time-to-revise-the-10-point-scale-to-account-for-modern
-female-obesity "target =" _ blank "rel =" noopener noreferrer "> the 10
</a> scale, you might now see why. By rating, you elevate your focus (and
THUS the Perceived importance) To That rating, Rather than your own game or
more helpful cues in the environment, and by doing so, you & # 8217; ve
gone down a chute That isn & # 8217; t really Focused on your purpose. May
you begin to grow anxious, pumping yourself with worry Because You & #
8217; re & # 8220; & # 9 approaching 8221. That isn & # 8217; t to say That
some girls aren & # 8217; t hotter or much hotter than others of course,
purpose I try to focus my attention is Those Things That can assist my
game, Rather than, at best, present me with redundancies. </ p>
<P> Generally speaking, half the game is Overcoming your anxieties with
women. Having too many things to focus tends it will pour augmenter Those
anxieties. The more things you-have to think about, the more you can create
imaginary fears as a result of 'em, and now elevated in your care, you
assign undue importance to' em. That & # 8217; s why I try to take an
approach that & # 8217; S focused as narrowly as possible: </ p>.
<P> <img class = "wp-image-alignnone 120295" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg"
alt = "" width = "337 "height =" 512 "srcset ="
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg
494w, http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/04 /
10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-300x455.jpg 300w, 262w
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-262x398.jpg "sizes
=" (max-width: 337px) 100vw, 337px "/> </ p>
<P> Purpose Now That we & # 8217; ve Focused on something That I don & #
8217; t think you shouldn & # 8217; t focus on, what are Those Things That
You shoulds to make yourself great more </ p>?
<P> <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.returnofkings.com/48450/4-ways-beginners-can-choose-better-girls-to-approach"
rel="noopener noreferrer"> I first look for signs That She & # 8217; s
receptive to an approach </a> I & # 8217;. my big believer in proper target
selection, so, aside from her Actually being white a girl I desire, that &
# 8217; s what I pay careful to first. I Never Had the inclination to mass
approach, though in ways Some That style is better suited to the & # 8220;
& # 8221 channeled care; system, as Cialdini might call it, Because
approaching Any girl Gives You One thing less to think about. Nevertheless,
Those are indicators of receptivity Generally reliable, and my friends
approacher mass-have you blow offs Many have hooks, so I focus one
receptivity first. </ P>
<P> Once you & # 8217; ve Established That You want her and you think she &
# 8217; s receptive, you must stop everything you & # 8217; re doing and
move Toward her time immediately. If you pay attention to anything else to,
you & # 8217;. Likely re hjälper the approach </ p>
<P> Something odd after-Developed my initial stage in the game Where I Was
ecstatic at <a href
= "http://masculineepic.com/index.php/2015/09/14/do-these-things-to-overcome
-approach-anxiety / "target =" _ blank "rel =" noopener noreferrer ">
Overcoming my approach anxiety. </a> My approach Slowed spleen. It & #
8217; s not Necessarily That There Was less girls I Was interested in, it &
# 8217; s just That I wasn & # 8217; t have Following through Often, For
Reasons That Were Often more indifference than fear. Why? </ P>
<P> As it turns out, after-That initial period of excitement created by
doing something I never thought I Could do before, I Began To Realize That
I actually got more work done outside than inside. It was an environment
That allowed me to focus more. So I started going outside to read Good
books and get more writing projects done. Day game wasn & # 8217; t my sole
focus anymore. Lo and behold, my focus Was THUS divided. With two things
competing for it, I would take more Often the path of least resistance.
When I Understood this, I could Began to A Higher priority is approaching
girls Genuinely I Was Attracted to. When I saw a girl I liked, I would put
my stuff down and we focus only her, what I liked about her, and putting
one foot in front of the other. This ordering or sorting of my focus for
this solved. </ P>
<P> Understand That People can only focus on one thing at a time.
Multitasking doesn & # 8217; t exist. To maximize your productivity,
you-have to make safe and out to narrow the tasks before you. When it comes
to approaching, your focus shoulds be channeled as much as possible, is
your girl and nothing else. </ P>
<P> The simple system can go like this: </ p>
<Ol>
<Li> Do you want her or not? As Troy Said In His excellent article, <a href
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/117164/the-one-girl-you-absolutely-must-approach-every-day"
target = "_ blank" rel = "noopener noreferrer"> if she tugs your DNA, the
answer is yes. </a> </ li>
<Li> Does she look receptive? </ Li>
<Li> Stop everything else you & # 8217; re doing or Even thinking except
conjuring your opener and putting one foot in front of the other. The only
exception to this is if you For some reason can & # 8217; t approach At
That time </ li>.
</ Ol>
<P> <img class = "size-full wp alignnone-image-120298" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/5c6OZV9.jpg" alt
= "" width = "222" height = "550" /> </ p>
<P> There are many more applications to this <a
href="http://amzn.to/2qsaqKl"> <em> Pre-Suasion </ em> </a> channeled
careful approach to your game is That I Intended going into (PARTICULARLY
icts applicability opening in talking and texting) goal I & # 8217; m
butted up contre my limits. Look for more to come. </ P>
<P> <strong> Read More: <em> <a
href="http://www.returnofkings.com/118967/how-to-meet-and-date-mormon-girls">
How To Meet And Date Mormon Girls </a> </ em> </ strong> </ p>
<Img src = "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ReturnOfKings/~4/Aa7O2OgZE_M"
height = "1" width = "1" alt = "" />
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg"
class = "attachment-afterimage Image size-post-wp-post-picture "alt
=" "srcset ="
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg
494w, http: //www.returnofkings .com / wp-content / uploads / 2017/04 /
10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-300x455.jpg 300w, 262w
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-262x398.jpg "sizes
=" (max-width: 494px) 100vw, 494px "/> </ div> <p> Countless
words-have-been written about the role of Attention whoring in the game
today. While this is considerable, it & # 8217; s worth paying attention to
the concept of Attention to Itself. SPECIFICALLY, it & # 8217; s worth
Noting how you can use it to <em> your </ em> advantage. Channeling your
focus Correctly is Perhaps the Most Powerful thing you can do, Especially
For your inner game. </ P>
<P> For starters, the Brain Evolved to square one extreme importance Those
Things Focuses it is. Robert Cialdini, the & # 8220; Godfather of
Influence, & # 8221; Says In His new book <a href="http://amzn.to/2qsaqKl">
<em> Pre-Suasion </ em> </a>: </ p>
<Blockquote> <p> Why do we assume Typically That whatever we are focusing
on in the moment is Especially important? One Reason Is That whatever it is
we are focusing significant Especially in the moment. It & # 8217; s only
reasonable to give Heightened Attention To Those factors That-have The Most
significance and utility for us in a Particular circumstances: a strange
noise in the dark, the smell of smoke in a theater, a luxury CEO to speak
<. / p>
<P> This responsive system of focusing our limited focus resources is what
does Indeed Possess special import HAS year imperfection, though: <u> we
Can Be Brought to the mistaken belief That something is significant Merely
Because We-have-been led by Some irrelevant factor Narrowed to give it our
attention. </ u> All Too Often, people believe That if They Have Attention
paid to an idea or event or group, it must be significant enough to warrant
the consideration. That & # 8217;. S not true </ p> </ blockquote>
<P> This is something Known As the & # 8220; & # 8221 focusing illusion.
Being aware of and compensating for this can make you a lot more confident,
productive and resilient. Though I & # 8217; ve stumbled onto this in my
experiences, Cialdini & # 8217; s words crystallized em for me, making the
distillation of experience into a productive system as possible. Here are a
Few Things I & # 8217; ve Learned about channeling focus to maximize your
life and for our purposes, your game. SPECIFICALLY, I & # 8217; m going to
talk about in this column approaching </ p>.
<P> <img class = "wp-image-alignnone 120294" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/focus.jpg" alt
= "" width = "485 "height =" 329 "srcset ="
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/focus.jpg 556w,
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/04 /
focus-300x203.jpg 300w, 262w
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/focus-262x178.jpg "sizes
=" (max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px "/> </ p>
<H3> <strong> The Approach </ strong> </ h3>
<P> For starters, I don & # 8217; t <a href
= "http://masculineepic.com/index.php/2017/03/22/stop-rating-girls-looks-on-the-1-10
-scale / "target =" _ blank "rel =" noopener noreferrer "> spleen girls on
the 1-10 scale. </a> it always Seemed like a roundabout, Unnecessary
exercise to me, drank more importantly than that, it might Actively harm
you. Why? Because a girl on the rating scale puts your Focus On That
rating. In <em> Pre-Suasion & # 8217; s </ em> second chapter, Cialdini
Discusses the concept of & # 8220;. & # 8221 target chuting; </ p>
<P> Suppose, for instance, That I-have the thankless job of trying to get
your information and signing for something on the street. You know how this
goes, you never stop Almost. Yet, that & # 8217; s Often Because The people
vying for your time you are priming in the wrong way. One group of people I
encounter a lot in my neighborhood (by the nearby campus of course) Asks me
& # 8220;? Do you have time for LGBT rights & # 8221; Note the value-taking
opener here. But, what if They Were to ask me if & # 8220;? I Was a helpful
person & # 8221; That Cialdini shows us this is what a pair of
communication scientists DID When experimenting to see what lines of
questioning to get people to stop and comply with survey requests in a
mall. They found That asking Their prospects: & # 8220; do you Consider
Yourself a helpful person & # 8221;? resulted in 77% of the people They
Asked stopping and cooperating with 'em. </ p>
<P> Why Was this? The answer is que la scientists elevated focus to the
concept of being white helpful INSTEAD of asking for Their prospects & #
8217; precious time. Most people want to think of Themselves as helpful,
and MOST people will-have memories of being white helpful. In effect, by
asking the question, you & # 8217; ve feel your prospect down a Targeted &
# 8220; & # 8221 fall; and Focused On That person & # 8217; s experiences.
In this time That Person will be much more receptive to aligned requests
(in this case, helping out with a survey or Even giving out personal
information), hence the title <em> Pre-Suasion </ em>. </ P>
<P> That was an admittedly roundabout explanation of & # 8220; chuting
target, & # 8221; goal there you have it. Getting back to my decision not
to rate girls on <a href
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/113147/its-time-to-revise-the-10-point-scale-to-account-for-modern
-female-obesity "target =" _ blank "rel =" noopener noreferrer "> the 10
</a> scale, you might now see why. By rating, you elevate your focus (and
THUS the Perceived importance) To That rating, Rather than your own game or
more helpful cues in the environment, and by doing so, you & # 8217; ve
gone down a chute That isn & # 8217; t really Focused on your purpose. May
you begin to grow anxious, pumping yourself with worry Because You & #
8217; re & # 8220; & # 9 approaching 8221. That isn & # 8217; t to say That
some girls aren & # 8217; t hotter or much hotter than others of course,
purpose I try to focus my attention is Those Things That can assist my
game, Rather than, at best, present me with redundancies. </ p>
<P> Generally speaking, half the game is Overcoming your anxieties with
women. Having too many things to focus tends it will pour augmenter Those
anxieties. The more things you-have to think about, the more you can create
imaginary fears as a result of 'em, and now elevated in your care, you
assign undue importance to' em. That & # 8217; s why I try to take an
approach that & # 8217; S focused as narrowly as possible: </ p>.
<P> <img class = "wp-image-alignnone 120295" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg"
alt = "" width = "337 "height =" 512 "srcset ="
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n.jpg
494w, http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/04 /
10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-300x455.jpg 300w, 262w
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/10514464_331100187055973_2463329743217441506_n-262x398.jpg "sizes
=" (max-width: 337px) 100vw, 337px "/> </ p>
<P> Purpose Now That we & # 8217; ve Focused on something That I don & #
8217; t think you shouldn & # 8217; t focus on, what are Those Things That
You shoulds to make yourself great more </ p>?
<P> <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.returnofkings.com/48450/4-ways-beginners-can-choose-better-girls-to-approach"
rel="noopener noreferrer"> I first look for signs That She & # 8217; s
receptive to an approach </a> I & # 8217;. my big believer in proper target
selection, so, aside from her Actually being white a girl I desire, that &
# 8217; s what I pay careful to first. I Never Had the inclination to mass
approach, though in ways Some That style is better suited to the & # 8220;
& # 8221 channeled care; system, as Cialdini might call it, Because
approaching Any girl Gives You One thing less to think about. Nevertheless,
Those are indicators of receptivity Generally reliable, and my friends
approacher mass-have you blow offs Many have hooks, so I focus one
receptivity first. </ P>
<P> Once you & # 8217; ve Established That You want her and you think she &
# 8217; s receptive, you must stop everything you & # 8217; re doing and
move Toward her time immediately. If you pay attention to anything else to,
you & # 8217;. Likely re hjälper the approach </ p>
<P> Something odd after-Developed my initial stage in the game Where I Was
ecstatic at <a href
= "http://masculineepic.com/index.php/2015/09/14/do-these-things-to-overcome
-approach-anxiety / "target =" _ blank "rel =" noopener noreferrer ">
Overcoming my approach anxiety. </a> My approach Slowed spleen. It & #
8217; s not Necessarily That There Was less girls I Was interested in, it &
# 8217; s just That I wasn & # 8217; t have Following through Often, For
Reasons That Were Often more indifference than fear. Why? </ P>
<P> As it turns out, after-That initial period of excitement created by
doing something I never thought I Could do before, I Began To Realize That
I actually got more work done outside than inside. It was an environment
That allowed me to focus more. So I started going outside to read Good
books and get more writing projects done. Day game wasn & # 8217; t my sole
focus anymore. Lo and behold, my focus Was THUS divided. With two things
competing for it, I would take more Often the path of least resistance.
When I Understood this, I could Began to A Higher priority is approaching
girls Genuinely I Was Attracted to. When I saw a girl I liked, I would put
my stuff down and we focus only her, what I liked about her, and putting
one foot in front of the other. This ordering or sorting of my focus for
this solved. </ P>
<P> Understand That People can only focus on one thing at a time.
Multitasking doesn & # 8217; t exist. To maximize your productivity,
you-have to make safe and out to narrow the tasks before you. When it comes
to approaching, your focus shoulds be channeled as much as possible, is
your girl and nothing else. </ P>
<P> The simple system can go like this: </ p>
<Ol>
<Li> Do you want her or not? As Troy Said In His excellent article, <a href
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/117164/the-one-girl-you-absolutely-must-approach-every-day"
target = "_ blank" rel = "noopener noreferrer"> if she tugs your DNA, the
answer is yes. </a> </ li>
<Li> Does she look receptive? </ Li>
<Li> Stop everything else you & # 8217; re doing or Even thinking except
conjuring your opener and putting one foot in front of the other. The only
exception to this is if you For some reason can & # 8217; t approach At
That time </ li>.
</ Ol>
<P> <img class = "size-full wp alignnone-image-120298" src
= "http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/5c6OZV9.jpg" alt
= "" width = "222" height = "550" /> </ p>
<P> There are many more applications to this <a
href="http://amzn.to/2qsaqKl"> <em> Pre-Suasion </ em> </a> channeled
careful approach to your game is That I Intended going into (PARTICULARLY
icts applicability opening in talking and texting) goal I & # 8217; m
butted up contre my limits. Look for more to come. </ P>
<P> <strong> Read More: <em> <a
href="http://www.returnofkings.com/118967/how-to-meet-and-date-mormon-girls">
How To Meet And Date Mormon Girls </a> </ em> </ strong> </ p>
<Img src = "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ReturnOfKings/~4/Aa7O2OgZE_M"
height = "1" width = "1" alt = "" />
Saturday, April 29, 2017
pro and weak: older women compared to younger women
[Image: First date advice first date online, online dating advice, which
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits]
There are great things about dating younger women, and very bad things.
There are great things about dating older women and very bad things. Today
I will discuss in detail the two.
First, as always, we need our rights definitions. What exactly
not "more" or "young" mean?
long-time readers know that I usually separate the "more" versus "younger"
at the age of 33. As I mentioned several times here, when a woman goes on
age
33 (if not earlier), its ASD points in the stratosphere and all his
attitude about dating, men and sex changes forever. Things that were once
nice to her, like sex on the first or second date, or very occasional
sex, are now suddenly horrible and largely unacceptable.
This does not mean dating women of more than 33% is poor 100. In this
article, and
I discuss one of the good things * * on women dating over 33 and how
navigate some of the problems they present.
"Young women" are the women aged 32 and under. A third category,
Very young women or VYW are women under 23. For purposes of this
article, when I say "young", I mean women aged 18-32, and when
I say "more" I speak of women 33+ unless otherwise noted. His
True there are several subcategories within these two groups, but I
already covered here.
* Vs old Overview Young *
Before going into this, remember that whatever I say is here *
generalization*. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule. There is
* Some * very independent girl, organized, responsible, mature 18
and there are some * very low TSA 38 years hit you on the
first date in an hour or two of you meet no resistance at all.
Yeah yeah. Whatever. In both cases, these women are unusual *
* exceptions to the rule. They actually prove the rule. I am not interested
to discuss unusual exceptions to the rule (other than acknowledging
they do exist) and I do not take into account comments complaining that
I'm generalizing (because I am) and there are rare exceptions, unusual
there (duh, I know).
Alrightee. All I say is in the context of fast sex dating
model I practice and teach, shown here (click to enlarge):
[Image: fast_sex_model]
In this model, there are three distinct phases: Phase pickup (get
woman agree to meet with you one against one), the encounter phase (go to
sex as soon as possible, ideally on the second date / time to meet in 3-4
the total time of the face), and relationship management phase (sexual
being through
causation or serious, or that are nonmonogamous).
In general, young women are much easier in the pickup / dating
phases, but tend to be more and more long-term work in the relationship
phase. The younger they are, the more they are true. In other words,
a 18 year old will be * very easy for pickup / dating phase and a
Fucking absolute cluster for the long-term relationship phase, while a 28
years will be less easy during pickup / dating and less difficult
during the connection phase.
Older women tend to be * * otherwise. They are absolute nightmares
in the pick-up / dating stages, but if you are somehow able to persevere, to
with all TSA, bullshit, the logic of women, and ridiculous claims (and
the case of fast sex model, get lucky with sex happens
relatively quickly) and ongoing relationships tend to be easier and more
reliable with these women.
The problem is the words * Fast sex. * I personally do not like waiting more
two or three dates with zero sex, since I do not see the point, and
there are too many beautiful women in the world who are perfectly happy to
have
sex on two dates. If you feel the same way as me, most relationships
you will be with younger women (under 33 or over) simply because
most women over 33 never get to the point of having a relationship
you because they will insist on making you wait too long to sex, which
you go after them and have sex with the 26 years around the corner which
* * Do you expect.
Of course, you can follow a more traditional, male-type beta dating,
where you have five or more dates before having sex (ugh, kill me), and
and more relationships with older women, but slowly get sex
as this is not what this blog or my books are about.
* Other advantages and disadvantages *
With all that being said, here are some other pros and cons. They
are listed in no particular order.
* 1. Reliability and planning * - Older women earn here. In terms of
maintaining a reliable schedule for meeting and dates, young women are
difficult and VYW are extremely difficult. Older women, even those
single mothers tend to be more reliable and less flaky. Certainly, all women
flakey are to some extent (it is base portion to be female), but the
flocculent
factor significantly decreases when a woman is over 30 years and even when
she
is over 35 years VYW are great fun, but good god, the constant chipping,
Forgetting, rescheduling, emergency situations and cancellation becomes
extremely
irritating, especially when you're a busy guy juggling work, family,
several women, Mission, etc.
* 2. Easy compliance - * Young women earn here a long time. Young women are
* Far * more likely to go with a program defined for them more
Women, who tend to be strong and strong opinions in their habits. (Older
men are the same way, including me.) As always, the youngest of
woman, more consistent, it tends to be (although there certainly
exceptions, especially in the world of sugar daddy).
* 3. Drama - * Older women earn here; not by much, but they do. Women over
33
Indeed, * tend to be less dramatic overall in relations underway. I'm not
saying older women are zero drama, drama or even lower. (All women are
theater
to some degree.) I mean they tend to have * less * drama
young women, who are generally more suspicious, whiny, bitchy, and / or
complain
About bullshit more often.
There are two reasons for this. Young women tend to be more connected
with the fact that they are young and hot, so subconsciously think
they can throw more drama and crap to a man, he will put up with. Also,
younger men tend to put up with more drama than WAY older guy, and since
young women are more accustomed to younger men, they are more acclimated
to more dramatic relationships.
* 4. gender quality - * I'm going to surprise a lot of people here and piss
many women, since programming Societal said that older women are better
in bed. It is true that older women are more comfortable and understanding
their own body during sex than younger women, but are they better *
* bed that young women?
All I can is from my own experience and the experience of
men I have communicated about it for many years. I slept with
many older women and younger women, and I must say that, in general
(And yet, there are many exceptions) * * young women tend to be better
in bed.
I'm sorry, but it is true. During sex, young women tend to be more
excited, enthusiastic, willing to try new things, willing to follow
instructions, and are * less fussy way. There is a light and eager
The eyes of young women during sex frankly, most older women do not have.
Many women in their 30's had a lot of this "light" burned on
by children from stress, many failed relationships, financial pressures and
all kinds of other luggage. (Example of celebrity: Britney Spears Hit.
YouTube, watch some interviews with her when she was 19, then watch some of
her today. The first woman is bubbly, enthusiastic and excited. the
second wife robotics with dead eyes.)
You could say that some young women are faking enthusiasm when
sex, and perhaps in some scenarios, they are, but reinforces my
point; it shows that they care more about your experience of an older woman
who refuses to show enthusiasm, false or otherwise.
It is true that older women tend to be easier orgasm during sex because
they know
their own bodies, and that many young women either can not enjoy at all or
take a very long time to do it. It is also true that there is a little more
women who absolutely blow your mind and your body during sex. Yet overall,
I must say that younger women tend to be better here. Frankly, it
surprised me, because before my conversion to 2.0 Alpha Male status much
there a few years ago, I bought into the false SP who said: "Older women
are better
bed."
* 5. Intelligence / conversational capacity - * This one is a little tricky,
and it is the only one where the two categories of "young" and
"Veterans" are not enough. Instead, we must break things on three
Categories: VYW (18-22 years), moderately young women (23-32
years) and older women (33+).
One of my favorite things to do with a non-FB woman in my life is just
sit down and talk to him. Many of you guys in my age group seem to agree it
is
a nice thing to do with a woman.
Can you do with VYW? No. With few exceptions, you will not be able
to do with a woman that young, especially if you are an older man
(Over 35 years). Many men do this as one of the biggest drawbacks
younger women, and I agree (although I think the drama and scales are
the biggest drawbacks). I analyzed this problem in detail here.
However, there is a notable difference between the conversation,
Intellectual ability of a woman in her mid to late 20s against a woman
33? In my experience, not really. If both women are reasonably assume
intelligence, I do not think that women over 33 have an important advantage
this field than younger women. (Of course, there are idiots low intelligence
in any age group; I'm not talking about them, and women should not
be anyway FB.)
So the summary is here that women age 23 and win here, women in
23 lose, and lose big.
* 6. Longevity relationships - * Older women earn here. If your goal
is to enter a long steady relationship is more serious than a FB,
More women are, the better your chances become, no matter if it is
MLTR or a OLTR (although OLTR usually last longer than if the MLTR
woman is older). It flips done in the other direction if we talk
FB; young women in FB last longer than women will.
Older women tend to be less comfortable with casual sex
(Unless they cheat on a husband / boyfriend and you are the guy on the
side). My long FB relationships tended to be with younger women
(Including VYW) and my longest relationship more serious (for MLTR, upscale
of MLTR and OLTR) tended to last longer with women who were over 30
or so. Many of you have reflected the same experience (although
again, there are always exceptions).
* 7. Body - * Again, I'm going to surprise a lot of people here. societal
Programming, especially in the manosphere preaches that younger women
have perfect bodies, and as soon as they cross over 30 years, their SMV
tumbles instantly and their bodies get instant disgusting.
I * not * found this to be the case at all. Indeed, I met
a hell of a lot of the exact opposite; young women with stretch marks and
other oddities babies, weight gain, smoking pot, drinking alcohol,
Tats and piercings, and women over 30, often * well * over 30, with a
perfect,
incredible, tight, trim, body as a teenager.
When women have reached 40, then yes, so I start to see a consistent set of
problems
with the naked female body. But before 40 years, I must say I am
met too many women in their 30's with amazing body too
Women under 30 with average or problematic organisms.
I found that women in their 20's (or legal teens) just do not give a
shit on health, fitness, eating right, exercising, taking care of their
the skin, and stay thin, while women over 30 years tend to be obsessed with
this kind of things. I really see this is reflected in the many bare
I'm close and personal with the body in terms of women in both
categories.
Am I saying that women in their 30s have better bodies than women under
thirty? No, I can not go that far. I am with too perfect-body many younger
women.
However, I can say that in terms of women under 40 years, I consider the
quality
the bare means of the average American woman body in its 20
the average American woman in her 30 years on a tie *. * It is the same
thing,
on average, on the whole, with about an equal distribution of hot bodies and
organisms defective in both age groups. More than 40, most women will lose
effect
tie, so that women under 40 are definitely better than the naked search
40. (Although this is changing rapidly as the entire human race continues
get younger.)
I'm sure you can find some statistics that conflict with what I have
said, that perhaps * * statistically there are more overweight women
in their 30s than in their 20s That might be true, but here's the thing;
you're going to kiss a lot of fat women in their 30s? Of course not. So
overweight women are not even relevant to the case (unless that's what
you're into).
Therefore, regarding women in their 30 * you would actually have sex
* with, I do not see a great disparity in the quality of the body between
the modern West
Women in their 30's and modern Western women in their 20's I do not.
And I watched. (Outside of the West is a different story, of
course. On my flight back to the US from China recently, I saw some women
from Columbia ... Oh God.)
* So which is better? *
Who is better? Younger or older? The answer is, it depends on who you
and what you want. If you want a whole lot of fun, casual relationships,
young women are the way to go. If you are looking for a long, serious
relationship, going on 33 years might be a good idea (unless you
are younger than 33). If you are an older man and you want to hit younger
chicks, chicks and banging younger. Enjoy. But, if you are an older man
wants to settle long term, choosing a much younger woman
crazy. If the quick sex is important to you, stick with younger women. You
obtain
the idea.
Alpha Smart 2.0 uses different age groups for different purposes. as just
an example, my OLTR is in his late 30, which is what I wanted. of My FB
are all very young, which again, is exactly what I wanted. You could
consider FB is also great for younger women (including VYW) but raise the
age
bar a bit for this MLTR and perhaps a little more for a OLTR (if OLTR is
what you want).
My personal opinion is that I still will * always * a focus on women under
age 33 simply because I hate the TSA and wait for sex, although exceptions
always slip through (including my current OLTR), especially if my
goal is something more long-term and more serious. You should also
sort that depending on your age. I just turned 45; if you are 30 or 55
you prioritize things differently than me
As always, start with what you * will * Long-term happy, and go
The. Forget what society or women want for you.
The post of Pro and small: older women compared to younger women appear
first on the
Blog Pua Mgtow.
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits]
There are great things about dating younger women, and very bad things.
There are great things about dating older women and very bad things. Today
I will discuss in detail the two.
First, as always, we need our rights definitions. What exactly
not "more" or "young" mean?
long-time readers know that I usually separate the "more" versus "younger"
at the age of 33. As I mentioned several times here, when a woman goes on
age
33 (if not earlier), its ASD points in the stratosphere and all his
attitude about dating, men and sex changes forever. Things that were once
nice to her, like sex on the first or second date, or very occasional
sex, are now suddenly horrible and largely unacceptable.
This does not mean dating women of more than 33% is poor 100. In this
article, and
I discuss one of the good things * * on women dating over 33 and how
navigate some of the problems they present.
"Young women" are the women aged 32 and under. A third category,
Very young women or VYW are women under 23. For purposes of this
article, when I say "young", I mean women aged 18-32, and when
I say "more" I speak of women 33+ unless otherwise noted. His
True there are several subcategories within these two groups, but I
already covered here.
* Vs old Overview Young *
Before going into this, remember that whatever I say is here *
generalization*. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule. There is
* Some * very independent girl, organized, responsible, mature 18
and there are some * very low TSA 38 years hit you on the
first date in an hour or two of you meet no resistance at all.
Yeah yeah. Whatever. In both cases, these women are unusual *
* exceptions to the rule. They actually prove the rule. I am not interested
to discuss unusual exceptions to the rule (other than acknowledging
they do exist) and I do not take into account comments complaining that
I'm generalizing (because I am) and there are rare exceptions, unusual
there (duh, I know).
Alrightee. All I say is in the context of fast sex dating
model I practice and teach, shown here (click to enlarge):
[Image: fast_sex_model]
In this model, there are three distinct phases: Phase pickup (get
woman agree to meet with you one against one), the encounter phase (go to
sex as soon as possible, ideally on the second date / time to meet in 3-4
the total time of the face), and relationship management phase (sexual
being through
causation or serious, or that are nonmonogamous).
In general, young women are much easier in the pickup / dating
phases, but tend to be more and more long-term work in the relationship
phase. The younger they are, the more they are true. In other words,
a 18 year old will be * very easy for pickup / dating phase and a
Fucking absolute cluster for the long-term relationship phase, while a 28
years will be less easy during pickup / dating and less difficult
during the connection phase.
Older women tend to be * * otherwise. They are absolute nightmares
in the pick-up / dating stages, but if you are somehow able to persevere, to
with all TSA, bullshit, the logic of women, and ridiculous claims (and
the case of fast sex model, get lucky with sex happens
relatively quickly) and ongoing relationships tend to be easier and more
reliable with these women.
The problem is the words * Fast sex. * I personally do not like waiting more
two or three dates with zero sex, since I do not see the point, and
there are too many beautiful women in the world who are perfectly happy to
have
sex on two dates. If you feel the same way as me, most relationships
you will be with younger women (under 33 or over) simply because
most women over 33 never get to the point of having a relationship
you because they will insist on making you wait too long to sex, which
you go after them and have sex with the 26 years around the corner which
* * Do you expect.
Of course, you can follow a more traditional, male-type beta dating,
where you have five or more dates before having sex (ugh, kill me), and
and more relationships with older women, but slowly get sex
as this is not what this blog or my books are about.
* Other advantages and disadvantages *
With all that being said, here are some other pros and cons. They
are listed in no particular order.
* 1. Reliability and planning * - Older women earn here. In terms of
maintaining a reliable schedule for meeting and dates, young women are
difficult and VYW are extremely difficult. Older women, even those
single mothers tend to be more reliable and less flaky. Certainly, all women
flakey are to some extent (it is base portion to be female), but the
flocculent
factor significantly decreases when a woman is over 30 years and even when
she
is over 35 years VYW are great fun, but good god, the constant chipping,
Forgetting, rescheduling, emergency situations and cancellation becomes
extremely
irritating, especially when you're a busy guy juggling work, family,
several women, Mission, etc.
* 2. Easy compliance - * Young women earn here a long time. Young women are
* Far * more likely to go with a program defined for them more
Women, who tend to be strong and strong opinions in their habits. (Older
men are the same way, including me.) As always, the youngest of
woman, more consistent, it tends to be (although there certainly
exceptions, especially in the world of sugar daddy).
* 3. Drama - * Older women earn here; not by much, but they do. Women over
33
Indeed, * tend to be less dramatic overall in relations underway. I'm not
saying older women are zero drama, drama or even lower. (All women are
theater
to some degree.) I mean they tend to have * less * drama
young women, who are generally more suspicious, whiny, bitchy, and / or
complain
About bullshit more often.
There are two reasons for this. Young women tend to be more connected
with the fact that they are young and hot, so subconsciously think
they can throw more drama and crap to a man, he will put up with. Also,
younger men tend to put up with more drama than WAY older guy, and since
young women are more accustomed to younger men, they are more acclimated
to more dramatic relationships.
* 4. gender quality - * I'm going to surprise a lot of people here and piss
many women, since programming Societal said that older women are better
in bed. It is true that older women are more comfortable and understanding
their own body during sex than younger women, but are they better *
* bed that young women?
All I can is from my own experience and the experience of
men I have communicated about it for many years. I slept with
many older women and younger women, and I must say that, in general
(And yet, there are many exceptions) * * young women tend to be better
in bed.
I'm sorry, but it is true. During sex, young women tend to be more
excited, enthusiastic, willing to try new things, willing to follow
instructions, and are * less fussy way. There is a light and eager
The eyes of young women during sex frankly, most older women do not have.
Many women in their 30's had a lot of this "light" burned on
by children from stress, many failed relationships, financial pressures and
all kinds of other luggage. (Example of celebrity: Britney Spears Hit.
YouTube, watch some interviews with her when she was 19, then watch some of
her today. The first woman is bubbly, enthusiastic and excited. the
second wife robotics with dead eyes.)
You could say that some young women are faking enthusiasm when
sex, and perhaps in some scenarios, they are, but reinforces my
point; it shows that they care more about your experience of an older woman
who refuses to show enthusiasm, false or otherwise.
It is true that older women tend to be easier orgasm during sex because
they know
their own bodies, and that many young women either can not enjoy at all or
take a very long time to do it. It is also true that there is a little more
women who absolutely blow your mind and your body during sex. Yet overall,
I must say that younger women tend to be better here. Frankly, it
surprised me, because before my conversion to 2.0 Alpha Male status much
there a few years ago, I bought into the false SP who said: "Older women
are better
bed."
* 5. Intelligence / conversational capacity - * This one is a little tricky,
and it is the only one where the two categories of "young" and
"Veterans" are not enough. Instead, we must break things on three
Categories: VYW (18-22 years), moderately young women (23-32
years) and older women (33+).
One of my favorite things to do with a non-FB woman in my life is just
sit down and talk to him. Many of you guys in my age group seem to agree it
is
a nice thing to do with a woman.
Can you do with VYW? No. With few exceptions, you will not be able
to do with a woman that young, especially if you are an older man
(Over 35 years). Many men do this as one of the biggest drawbacks
younger women, and I agree (although I think the drama and scales are
the biggest drawbacks). I analyzed this problem in detail here.
However, there is a notable difference between the conversation,
Intellectual ability of a woman in her mid to late 20s against a woman
33? In my experience, not really. If both women are reasonably assume
intelligence, I do not think that women over 33 have an important advantage
this field than younger women. (Of course, there are idiots low intelligence
in any age group; I'm not talking about them, and women should not
be anyway FB.)
So the summary is here that women age 23 and win here, women in
23 lose, and lose big.
* 6. Longevity relationships - * Older women earn here. If your goal
is to enter a long steady relationship is more serious than a FB,
More women are, the better your chances become, no matter if it is
MLTR or a OLTR (although OLTR usually last longer than if the MLTR
woman is older). It flips done in the other direction if we talk
FB; young women in FB last longer than women will.
Older women tend to be less comfortable with casual sex
(Unless they cheat on a husband / boyfriend and you are the guy on the
side). My long FB relationships tended to be with younger women
(Including VYW) and my longest relationship more serious (for MLTR, upscale
of MLTR and OLTR) tended to last longer with women who were over 30
or so. Many of you have reflected the same experience (although
again, there are always exceptions).
* 7. Body - * Again, I'm going to surprise a lot of people here. societal
Programming, especially in the manosphere preaches that younger women
have perfect bodies, and as soon as they cross over 30 years, their SMV
tumbles instantly and their bodies get instant disgusting.
I * not * found this to be the case at all. Indeed, I met
a hell of a lot of the exact opposite; young women with stretch marks and
other oddities babies, weight gain, smoking pot, drinking alcohol,
Tats and piercings, and women over 30, often * well * over 30, with a
perfect,
incredible, tight, trim, body as a teenager.
When women have reached 40, then yes, so I start to see a consistent set of
problems
with the naked female body. But before 40 years, I must say I am
met too many women in their 30's with amazing body too
Women under 30 with average or problematic organisms.
I found that women in their 20's (or legal teens) just do not give a
shit on health, fitness, eating right, exercising, taking care of their
the skin, and stay thin, while women over 30 years tend to be obsessed with
this kind of things. I really see this is reflected in the many bare
I'm close and personal with the body in terms of women in both
categories.
Am I saying that women in their 30s have better bodies than women under
thirty? No, I can not go that far. I am with too perfect-body many younger
women.
However, I can say that in terms of women under 40 years, I consider the
quality
the bare means of the average American woman body in its 20
the average American woman in her 30 years on a tie *. * It is the same
thing,
on average, on the whole, with about an equal distribution of hot bodies and
organisms defective in both age groups. More than 40, most women will lose
effect
tie, so that women under 40 are definitely better than the naked search
40. (Although this is changing rapidly as the entire human race continues
get younger.)
I'm sure you can find some statistics that conflict with what I have
said, that perhaps * * statistically there are more overweight women
in their 30s than in their 20s That might be true, but here's the thing;
you're going to kiss a lot of fat women in their 30s? Of course not. So
overweight women are not even relevant to the case (unless that's what
you're into).
Therefore, regarding women in their 30 * you would actually have sex
* with, I do not see a great disparity in the quality of the body between
the modern West
Women in their 30's and modern Western women in their 20's I do not.
And I watched. (Outside of the West is a different story, of
course. On my flight back to the US from China recently, I saw some women
from Columbia ... Oh God.)
* So which is better? *
Who is better? Younger or older? The answer is, it depends on who you
and what you want. If you want a whole lot of fun, casual relationships,
young women are the way to go. If you are looking for a long, serious
relationship, going on 33 years might be a good idea (unless you
are younger than 33). If you are an older man and you want to hit younger
chicks, chicks and banging younger. Enjoy. But, if you are an older man
wants to settle long term, choosing a much younger woman
crazy. If the quick sex is important to you, stick with younger women. You
obtain
the idea.
Alpha Smart 2.0 uses different age groups for different purposes. as just
an example, my OLTR is in his late 30, which is what I wanted. of My FB
are all very young, which again, is exactly what I wanted. You could
consider FB is also great for younger women (including VYW) but raise the
age
bar a bit for this MLTR and perhaps a little more for a OLTR (if OLTR is
what you want).
My personal opinion is that I still will * always * a focus on women under
age 33 simply because I hate the TSA and wait for sex, although exceptions
always slip through (including my current OLTR), especially if my
goal is something more long-term and more serious. You should also
sort that depending on your age. I just turned 45; if you are 30 or 55
you prioritize things differently than me
As always, start with what you * will * Long-term happy, and go
The. Forget what society or women want for you.
The post of Pro and small: older women compared to younger women appear
first on the
Blog Pua Mgtow.
Alpha Male Fairy Tales: Beauty and the Beast
[Image: First date advice first date online, online dating advice, which
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits] once he has experienced a
young, beautiful, carefree schizophrenic named Belle. She lived in a
remote village with her eccentric father, Maurice, who spent most of the
day reefer smoke with his pipe.
Still deep in his psychosis, she spent most of her days frolicking
the forest and talking to various creatures that do not exist. One day the
sun "spoke" to her and told her she should be more like him. Starting from
day before, she was still wearing a bright yellow dress.
[Image: beautiful]
In addition, in the village was Gaston, strong, nice, beautiful hunter
maintained a happy harem of three buxom blonde women.
[Image: Gaston]
When not hunting wild boar in the forest, he spent his days his pleasuring
three women (and other women of the village). his wives
would often playfully hobbit slave torture Gaston Dingleberry.
[Image: Girls Gaston]
All was well in the village.
One day, as Belle entered the village tavern, Gaston, his spying
luscious breasts, bowed graciously and opened the door for her.
"Welcome, young woman," he said. "If there's anything I do for
you, you have but to ask ".
Belle smiled Gaston, when suddenly the door of the tavern yelled at her and
said, "Do not trust him! It is a rapist! "
"Get away from me, you rapist! "She yelled and slapped face Gaston
and walked before him.
Gaston, knowing it was dishonorable to hit a woman, and simply glared
rubbed his face, saying nothing, feeling sorry for the poor, the mad woman.
Later in the evening, Maurice discovered, to his horror, that his stores
precious Reefer have been exhausted. As the largest leaf was indeed
thing in life for him, he mounted his horse and deep in the woods
acquire more. Late in the evening, he lived, various harvest reefer
plants in the woods.
Suddenly, a shadow hung over him, and he turned to see the beast.
[Image: Beast]
"This is my land," growled the beast. "This is my hideout reefer. You
steal from me. Go home old man and me afraid ".
" No! "Cried Maurice. "Only men of property rights! You're nothing but a
stupid!"
"Oooookay, enough," said the beast, and he fell and took
to Maurice as a rag doll. He carried to his castle in
Maurice forest and locked in his dungeon. "I'll release you when you
learn to respect the property of others ".
"Go screw! "Maurice spat, and the beast was left alone in considering
his thoughts.
The next day, Belle was very agitated, unable to find her father.
look for it in the forest, she fell on the castle of the Beast. she struck
at the door, and the beast response. The beast was surprised
out that Belle did not have a bad reaction to his face, as
Belle was too crazy to notice that she was talking to a beast.
"Hello, good sir," she said, "I was wondering if you have passed through
my father, Maurice ".
"Indeed I have," the beast sniffed. "He was stealing my ganja, I closed
him in my dungeon. It is also quite unpleasant ".
"Oh, sir," pleaded Belle. "If you could release him, I consider
the most amiable. "
"No," said the beast. "He's a thief. The thieves must be punished ".
"Surely there is something that I have to give in the trade of my father
Release?"
"Like that?"
"How about this? "Said Belle, as she pushed her amble bosom by
top of her dress.
"Well," said the beast given. "It was a good time. Okay."
And so it was that Beauty and the Beast was funky funky for hours and
hours around the castle. Once passed, the beast released Mauritius. When he
wanted her daughter to follow her home, she refused. As she coughed Beast
the hair of his mouth, she explained that she had a wonderful time
talking clocks, cups and candlesticks in the castle, saying they
were all excellent talkers.
Fed up with his crazy girl and wanting to smoke a reefer, he groaned
and left, back to the village.
Belle then spent the next few days to talk to different objects
The castle of the Beast with the beast looked on, shaking his head at his
paramour hopelessly schizophrenic yet sexually skilled.
Back in the village, Maurice went to Gaston, saying, "As you know,
are werewolves in the forest, and one of them stole my girl! he
must be put to death, and my daughter rescued! "
Be noble and valiant man, he was, Gaston has agreed to save Belle. he
rounded up several armed men in the village, and brought them into the
forest, his three wives in tow. High as a kite on reefer, Maurice tried not
laughing as they left, very amused with his disappointment.
That night, while in the throes of passionate love, Beauty and the
Beast heard a loud knock on the door. "God dammit! "Cried the beast. "Who
could it be now? "
"Maybe he is a Jehovah's Witness! "Belle offered with wide psychotic
the eyes.
"He's a rapist! "Said a near plug.
The beast growled, rolled out of bed, angrily threw on a robe and walked
downstairs to answer the door.
The look of Gaston was shocked when he saw the beast. "You're not a
werewolf,
naked as you are ", he said.
"No," said the beast, "I am once a man, but I was there years ago by a curse
bitch bad, and now I am condemned to carry this form ".
"I see that you are a noble creature, and do not want trouble," said
Gaston nodded.
The beast was about to answer, when suddenly there were screams in the
forest all around them. Indeed, these are the real werewolves * *. They had
arrived, smelling the prey and the search for slaughter.
[Image: warewolves]
Gaston drew his sword, shouting to the men, "defend my women! We will kill
these foul beasts! "
"I'll help you," said the beast, baring his teeth and flexing his
muscles. "I do not know why so many people trying to fuck my
property recently ".
Many werewolves confined to the forest, and Gaston, the beast and the
the village men gathered them in battle. Claws raked. The swords were
stolen. Some blood
splashed. Screams were heard. Members were divided. The battle was heroic
it was dark. Gaston, a skilled swordsman, killed werewolves heap. the
Beast roars, scratched, raked, and torn unclean wolves in bloody tatters.
From Belle casually looked over the castle walls while
eat paint chips and talking to a range near.
After several bloody minutes, the village men prevailed, but not
without loss. Many men died on the floor of the forest, though dead
the more werewolves.
Gaston, bloodied and bruised, went to the beast. "You helped save my life
and the life of my beloved sexy women. Beast or not, from this day,
I'll call you brother. "The two clasped hands, flexed their biceps, and
nodded to another.
And so it was that Gaston moved into the castle with his three wives and
slave hobbit, with many quartets and fivesomes (often including
Beautiful in pleasure) as the beast looked and laughed, smoking a ganja.
The three women have spent the rest of their days enjoying their husbands as
and the beast when in the mood for something different. Beautiful its past
life enjoying the two men as well as on long conversations
with her hairbrush.
The end.
Fairy tales Post Alpha Male: Beauty and the beast first appeared on
Blog Pua Mgtow.
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits] once he has experienced a
young, beautiful, carefree schizophrenic named Belle. She lived in a
remote village with her eccentric father, Maurice, who spent most of the
day reefer smoke with his pipe.
Still deep in his psychosis, she spent most of her days frolicking
the forest and talking to various creatures that do not exist. One day the
sun "spoke" to her and told her she should be more like him. Starting from
day before, she was still wearing a bright yellow dress.
[Image: beautiful]
In addition, in the village was Gaston, strong, nice, beautiful hunter
maintained a happy harem of three buxom blonde women.
[Image: Gaston]
When not hunting wild boar in the forest, he spent his days his pleasuring
three women (and other women of the village). his wives
would often playfully hobbit slave torture Gaston Dingleberry.
[Image: Girls Gaston]
All was well in the village.
One day, as Belle entered the village tavern, Gaston, his spying
luscious breasts, bowed graciously and opened the door for her.
"Welcome, young woman," he said. "If there's anything I do for
you, you have but to ask ".
Belle smiled Gaston, when suddenly the door of the tavern yelled at her and
said, "Do not trust him! It is a rapist! "
"Get away from me, you rapist! "She yelled and slapped face Gaston
and walked before him.
Gaston, knowing it was dishonorable to hit a woman, and simply glared
rubbed his face, saying nothing, feeling sorry for the poor, the mad woman.
Later in the evening, Maurice discovered, to his horror, that his stores
precious Reefer have been exhausted. As the largest leaf was indeed
thing in life for him, he mounted his horse and deep in the woods
acquire more. Late in the evening, he lived, various harvest reefer
plants in the woods.
Suddenly, a shadow hung over him, and he turned to see the beast.
[Image: Beast]
"This is my land," growled the beast. "This is my hideout reefer. You
steal from me. Go home old man and me afraid ".
" No! "Cried Maurice. "Only men of property rights! You're nothing but a
stupid!"
"Oooookay, enough," said the beast, and he fell and took
to Maurice as a rag doll. He carried to his castle in
Maurice forest and locked in his dungeon. "I'll release you when you
learn to respect the property of others ".
"Go screw! "Maurice spat, and the beast was left alone in considering
his thoughts.
The next day, Belle was very agitated, unable to find her father.
look for it in the forest, she fell on the castle of the Beast. she struck
at the door, and the beast response. The beast was surprised
out that Belle did not have a bad reaction to his face, as
Belle was too crazy to notice that she was talking to a beast.
"Hello, good sir," she said, "I was wondering if you have passed through
my father, Maurice ".
"Indeed I have," the beast sniffed. "He was stealing my ganja, I closed
him in my dungeon. It is also quite unpleasant ".
"Oh, sir," pleaded Belle. "If you could release him, I consider
the most amiable. "
"No," said the beast. "He's a thief. The thieves must be punished ".
"Surely there is something that I have to give in the trade of my father
Release?"
"Like that?"
"How about this? "Said Belle, as she pushed her amble bosom by
top of her dress.
"Well," said the beast given. "It was a good time. Okay."
And so it was that Beauty and the Beast was funky funky for hours and
hours around the castle. Once passed, the beast released Mauritius. When he
wanted her daughter to follow her home, she refused. As she coughed Beast
the hair of his mouth, she explained that she had a wonderful time
talking clocks, cups and candlesticks in the castle, saying they
were all excellent talkers.
Fed up with his crazy girl and wanting to smoke a reefer, he groaned
and left, back to the village.
Belle then spent the next few days to talk to different objects
The castle of the Beast with the beast looked on, shaking his head at his
paramour hopelessly schizophrenic yet sexually skilled.
Back in the village, Maurice went to Gaston, saying, "As you know,
are werewolves in the forest, and one of them stole my girl! he
must be put to death, and my daughter rescued! "
Be noble and valiant man, he was, Gaston has agreed to save Belle. he
rounded up several armed men in the village, and brought them into the
forest, his three wives in tow. High as a kite on reefer, Maurice tried not
laughing as they left, very amused with his disappointment.
That night, while in the throes of passionate love, Beauty and the
Beast heard a loud knock on the door. "God dammit! "Cried the beast. "Who
could it be now? "
"Maybe he is a Jehovah's Witness! "Belle offered with wide psychotic
the eyes.
"He's a rapist! "Said a near plug.
The beast growled, rolled out of bed, angrily threw on a robe and walked
downstairs to answer the door.
The look of Gaston was shocked when he saw the beast. "You're not a
werewolf,
naked as you are ", he said.
"No," said the beast, "I am once a man, but I was there years ago by a curse
bitch bad, and now I am condemned to carry this form ".
"I see that you are a noble creature, and do not want trouble," said
Gaston nodded.
The beast was about to answer, when suddenly there were screams in the
forest all around them. Indeed, these are the real werewolves * *. They had
arrived, smelling the prey and the search for slaughter.
[Image: warewolves]
Gaston drew his sword, shouting to the men, "defend my women! We will kill
these foul beasts! "
"I'll help you," said the beast, baring his teeth and flexing his
muscles. "I do not know why so many people trying to fuck my
property recently ".
Many werewolves confined to the forest, and Gaston, the beast and the
the village men gathered them in battle. Claws raked. The swords were
stolen. Some blood
splashed. Screams were heard. Members were divided. The battle was heroic
it was dark. Gaston, a skilled swordsman, killed werewolves heap. the
Beast roars, scratched, raked, and torn unclean wolves in bloody tatters.
From Belle casually looked over the castle walls while
eat paint chips and talking to a range near.
After several bloody minutes, the village men prevailed, but not
without loss. Many men died on the floor of the forest, though dead
the more werewolves.
Gaston, bloodied and bruised, went to the beast. "You helped save my life
and the life of my beloved sexy women. Beast or not, from this day,
I'll call you brother. "The two clasped hands, flexed their biceps, and
nodded to another.
And so it was that Gaston moved into the castle with his three wives and
slave hobbit, with many quartets and fivesomes (often including
Beautiful in pleasure) as the beast looked and laughed, smoking a ganja.
The three women have spent the rest of their days enjoying their husbands as
and the beast when in the mood for something different. Beautiful its past
life enjoying the two men as well as on long conversations
with her hairbrush.
The end.
Fairy tales Post Alpha Male: Beauty and the beast first appeared on
Blog Pua Mgtow.
Does Having children makes you happy or not?
[Image: First date advice first date online, online dating advice, which
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits] Welcome, everyone, to the
Fourth Pua Mgtow great debate! Today, "Fred" not my debate on
I argue that having children makes you less happy in the long run. As
still, both joined us the character limit for each 1700
reply.
The specific topic will discuss today:
* Having children intelligently makes men happier in the long run,
Not less.*
Fred FOR debate, I argue AGAINST.
Fred's comments will be blue like this. My comments will be in the usual
black font.
As always, I'll let Fred start and finish the debate with his comments. AT
the end, you can decide who won.
* THE BATTLE BEGINS !!! *
* Fred *
Thank you for accepting the debate. Let's start. Before entering
details, I would like to emphasize some starting points for
debate. I guess you'll have no problem with them:
1. There are very stupid ways to have children, such as hitting your
girlfriend when you're 15. Obviously, this is not conducive to long-term
happiness, and I do not want to discuss this situation.
2. I considered view of man here. Much of what we
discuss also apply to women, but I think we can keep it simple,
by not discussing men.
3. There are important and significant negative positive aspects to have
children. My argument is that the positives outweigh the negatives when
you have kids in a smart way, making you happier in the long run.
Your argument is that, regardless of how it is done, the negatives outweigh
the positives when you have children, making you less happy in the long
run. Correct?
Fred -Fanciful
*Black Dragon:*
I agree with your three parameters.
This is not my argument that the negatives outweigh the positives, as
each will have a different opinion on what is "positive" or
"Negative" and how much each value is his.
A straight, conservative, religious Alpha Male 1.0 can
consider having five children as a huge net positive (leaving a legacy,
do the will of God, having little minions to boss around, prove to the world
his penis works, etc.), even if it makes him less happy together
because of the extreme amount of work, cost, sacrifice and stress
places on himself, his finances, his wife, and his marriage. It is clearly
* *
less happy together that a man like me, but that did not matter to him.
It will still tell you that it's worth it because there are more positive
(in
their eyes). (And we did not discuss when that man is divorced, which
is statistically unlikely in the modern era, and must pay alimony for five *
children * or go to jail.)
My argument is that having children makes you less happy, on average, over
the
Overall, over a period of about 15-20 years, until the children grow up and
let. Because it does. Almost all the studies they've done on this subject
indicated. Almost all married couples with children I see will
through it; intense moments of joy followed by hours or even days
irritation and a lot of work, as I explained here. As with long-term
monogamy, this misfortune occurs regardless of "how you do it. " It is
inherent in the system. Having children is hard work, hard, which is
usually not
fun for mom or dad.
* Fred *
Hey BD
Just to make sure we're on the same page, I'll try to summarize what you
wrote:
- A person who consults huge positive aspects of having children (such as
leaving a legacy) that the negatives outweigh is incorrectly
weigh the positives and negatives. His life every day will be less
happy (because of the negative aspects), although he will not see it that
way
because it weighs the positives too strongly. Is it a
accurate summary of what you think?
- The main negative to have children: the extreme amount of work,
cost, the sacrifice and the stress it imposes on himself, his finances, his
wife,
and his marriage. And maybe pay alimony. All other things
add here?
- Your proof that having children makes you unhappy is 1) studies on this
subject and 2) your personal experience and the experience of others
you know. Is it correct?
- The graphic and written, to have children of your "How Happiness
Blog work over time "is your personal opinion, correct? It's not
on the basis of a study?
Fred -Fragile
*Black Dragon:*
1. No, it does not hurt weighing positive or negative. It is instead
placing his own happiness as a lower priority than other things.
So if he says, "Having children makes me happier," it is wrong. If, he said,
"Okay, well BD, having children makes me less happy, but I do not care
because
X and Y, "then it is okay. My only problem is happiness here.
In other words, you are more than welcome to defend or encourage lifestyles
you made less happy, but you can not tell me these lifestyles you
happier, because they do not.
2. Yes, that is a fairly comprehensive list. Regarding one of the elements,
remember
"Sacrifice" means always want to do things with your life that you are
unable to do so, because of the children. So many men who are fathers wish
they
could do so many things, but can not. Add to that everything else in this
list and you have a good amount of misfortune, even if you
the largest relative to Earth and your kids are the best kids in the world.
3. Correct. However, I would not describe my personal experience awareness
Children constantly miserable or unhappy. A little less happy if I did not
have children. The vast majority of mothers and fathers, if you have a
little alcohol in them and put them in a separate room away from
everyone knew that, quietly admit the same.
4. Correct, my personal opinion / extrapolation. However, I * highly * trust
if you give this chart to a qualified researcher in this field, they
would more or less agree with her.
* Fred *
1. Okay, I think I understand your point here.
2. We agree here
3. studies on this subject are almost irrelevant because they reflect
the average person. The average person is:
- A) * Broke / In Debt * - talk about stress! I can not imagine anything
more
scary as having children I can not be able to feed. The average person
is essentially living paycheck. There is a ton of data about it.
Here is a source.
- B) * Work work crappy 9-5 * Office - Super stressful. Your boss may
take a shit about you every day, but you can not cut off the only source of
income when you have kids. Great way to reduce your happiness.
- C) * In a less traditional sex (or low sex) marriage * - Ugh. You have
covered this enough on your blog, but again, the theme here is that
the average person feels trapped (in this case, sexually).
- D) * have children in their 20s or early 30 * - You guessed trapped.
You want to do something different and amazing with your life, but you are
financially trapped by your children.
The average person is less happy to have children? No they are shit-
completely trapped financially and sexually. What misery! Fortunately
there are ways will not leave. As you said, it is ideal for large
financial shape, hire a full-time nanny to help accomplish many of your
major life goals (first prob means having children in your 40s), and
non-monogamous marriage and premarital parenting plan. Happiness is
usually on the elimination of negative and positive creation. A study
with people with children would be smarter to show an increase of happiness,
because they face very few problems "average person."
*Black Dragon:*
Yeah, I know that the average person sucks, I do not know if you quote me or
make an argument. So your argument is children do not make a man less happy
if he does all of the following:
- Hiring a nanny (part time or full time?)
- Is able to easily afford a nanny (nannies are expensive)
- Do not * children until 40
- Is it regularly banging other women besides his wife
- A marriage contract and a parenting plan (if married, he did not even need
to be married?)
Yes or no?
If so, I will continue to discuss the above items.
If not, please tell me exactly * * and * * with details that "having
children
intelligently "means.
* Fred *
I quote and make an argument. The point here is that you claim
that the "average person sucks" and yet you use comprehensive studies of
the average
people to show why an Alpha 2.0 (in this case, which means that someone to
have children
intelligently) will be unhappy to have children. The studies (which are your
The main argument for why having children make you miserable) are not valid
for
how you propose (and I agree with) to have children.
And yes, the points you listed are how I (and you, I think) see
specificities of "having children smarter. "
To answer your questions:
- full-time nanny would be ideal
- Babysitters are expensive, but are not necessarily expensive. I met
live in au pair, the other day, and she continues to eat / board + $ 1,500
a month.
- To keep things simple, let's married with a prenup / parenting plan. I
know every state has different laws (some with common law
marriage) that make this complex. You have already discussed the ideal
ways to marry.
I have another main point of discussion, but I would like to address the
first point.
*Black Dragon:*
I agree that the statistics to which I refer are looking (mostly) normal
people who
do most of the bad things in life, so we'll pass it.
You have confirmed that the education of children "smarter" means that you
hire a
full-time nanny. You just said, hilarious, that pay a nanny $ 1500
month * more * provide her full-time room and board is not "cheap. "This
is ridiculous, I completely disagree, and I think the vast majority of
people who read it would be as well. Very few men, even the Alpha 2.0 is
that
make the recommendation $ 75 000 per year, will be able to easily
this.
So yes, I agree that if you are rich and can easily allow * *
Full-time, broadcast live in nanny to raise your children for you
screaming, it can not
damage your long-term happiness I describe normally. I have already said it
so in this article here, where I described how these types
problems do not apply to rich people. Rich people can have after divorce
Divorce can have several children out of wedlock, can get STDs, and
all kinds of problems that affect them as they affect non-rich
people. It is another world.
But if you think this option is available for the typical guy there
Next (or try to follow) the lifestyle recommended I speak
(Alpha Male 2.0), again, even if it is recommended $ 75 000 per year
then you are wrong.
* Fred *
Haha yes, $ 1,500 is "expensive". What I wanted to say that $ 1,500 a month
is a
good value as you get a 24/7/365 full-time nanny.
As you have mentioned, of course not reasonable if you make 75K
one year. But go, BD, you're nitpicking here. As I said, full-time
nanny is ideal. But what can we do to 75K a year? obviously
they can help as well. How about hiring a student to help
$ 10 per hour for a few days a week? Maybe it goes to $ 480 per month ($
480 =
$ 10 / hour x 4 hours per day x 3 days per week x 4 weeks per month) or $
5760 per
year. Not cheap, but reasonable for someone who makes 75K.
Or maybe you think this is not enough help and / or money. Perhaps the
recommended amount of income per year should be a little more 75K.
Again, I think everything is fussy. Unless you have you
nothing else to add related to your studies quoted are not valid or
specific intelligently have children, I would go to my next main
point.
*Black Dragon:*
This nanny thing was your idea, not mine. I'm still trying to nail
your specific definition of having children "intelligently. "You have
clearly said
above was to hire full-time, live in nanny. Now you move the goal
post and that he be paid a student for a few hours per week.
I can not answer your point if you keep changing your definition
"clever."
Please give me your final definition, very specific to raise children
"Cleverly" is. Then when I address, do not change.
* Fred *
Haha, you are definitely getting bogged down in details here. As I have
said from the beginning, the smartest and most ideal for
children is to have a full time nanny.
Just so we're on the same page:
- Yes, it is almost impossible if you only 75K per year.
- You can still do ok for yourself if you do that 75K per year (as I
described), but it's not ideal (not the smart way
kids)
- You set the number 75K, not me.
*Black Dragon:*
As I have said many times on my blog, you must obtain a specific agreement
definitions of words if you talk about a subject, or get you anywhere. It is
not a "detail". is your definition of "intelligently" raise children
important to this discussion; Indeed, it is all about here.
Your assertion is that "intelligently" raising children needs a full time,
live-in nanny. I agree it would offset most or all of your misfortune.
The problem is that the majority of VAST men read these words will not
to have this ability, making your entire invalid item, or at least
very, * very * small. I think I won that round. But I'll let readers
decide.
At your next point, if you had one.
* Fred *
Let's recap:
1. You asked that studies show that people are less happy when they
kids. I have shown that these studies are not valid. * But you still have
not
provided no evidence demonstrating that people are less happy. * This is
needed to "win" this turn.
2. I said that people will be much happier if that studies show
they have kids smarter (meaning they are large financial A.
Complete Form B. major life goals first (prob have children in your 40s)
C have not monogamous marriage w / + prenup parenting plan D. hire a full
nanny time. We agree that these 4 items you will do much
happier when you have children. You nitpicked one of these 4 articles and
said that now my whole point is invalid.
This is illogical. My whole argument is not undermined by a niggling
point, it is only slightly less strong. Your average reader (who was
never a condition to start, but let's go with it) can reach 85% say
having children smarter, and always will be much better than average
people in the studies.
Why has it to be full-time nanny or nothing? This does not
meaning. You can still get all A-C and a D (having a part-time
nanny) on 75K annually. You can get 100% A-D on a higher salary.
In addition, your current argument is non-existent; it is just nitpicking
One of my points, suggesting that it cancels everything. Answer please
exactly what your argument is why you will be unhappy to have children,
and explain how the average reader will not be able to achieve 100% (but can
to 85%) have children smarter invalidate the whole argument.
*Black Dragon:*
The studies include normal people who tend to suck; they are not invalid.
Yes
they were invalid, you would be able to offer all kinds of easy to do * *
Things to avoid * * misfortune happened, not difficult as hiring a
full-time nanny.
If one of your requirements is 4 full time, live in nanny, yes, your points
is invalid because it applies only to a small group of men.
If your point is the nanny is only 15% (!) Happiness
won, it's laughable. An Alpha Male 2.0 in great shape with protection
finance and non-monogamy is * still * will suffer significantly reduced
* Set * happiness in having children. Freedom, peace, travel, your daily
calendar, sex, life, low-cost, living abroad (if you want), sleep,
focus on your mission, * ALL * of these things are negatively affected to
some degree when to have children. It is true when they are small, so when
they are teenagers (but not quite as good). Then, after the age of 18, you
always *
* Have things like college fees, helping them get cars, helping them to get
jobs, helping them to settle in life, helping them to get through their
problems, and, and, and. There are so many ways your
the overall level of happiness decreases in some way, I can not even begin
to list
right here.
Saying that most of this shit is off just because you're not fat and can
Fucking other women who will not. How banging on FB using side when the
baby screaming in the middle of the night, when the 9-year needs
help with homework, when the old year just crashed his car 17?
I agree lifestyle Alpha 2.0 * help * fixed but not even 50% of this
reduces happiness.
* Fred *
* 1. * Here's what laughable- you have already accepted that the studies
were
irrelevant, and now you have changed your mind.
2. laughable- Also, you continue to claim that child care is a binary
problem. nanny full time vs. no nanny. It is not binary. There is a
spectrum of care solutions. A part-time nanny + do everything else
smarter you get about 85% of the way. Each person can
add or subtract hours childcare as they see fit.
3. Your evidence is still lacking. You simply listed negative
aspects of having children. The debate is not "Are there negatives
to have children? "Obviously, there are negative aspects of having
children. In
to "win" the debate, you must prove that the negative (happiness
decrease) in priority areas on the positive (increasing happiness).
4. Other aspects (AC) to have children are not smart
insignificant. In fact, the # 1 complaint from most of my friends who
children in an "unintelligent way" is that they are not able to kiss other
women.
5. When you are in your 40s, it's not so hard to do
much more than 75K per year. You have 20 years of work experience
At this point. I guess the majority of your readers who are over 40 are
making it much more than 75K per year.
6. Perhaps part of the problem is your outlook on children in general. A lot
people watch "help find a job, helping them to settle in life,
helping them to solve their problems "as positive (happiness) more things
where they appreciate the opportunity to help their mentor children.
Anyway, at this stage, it seems we turn our wheels here. I would like
as pass.
*Black Dragon:*
Let us then. Proceed.
* Fred *
I know we both agree that, in life, lots of happiness is derived to
meaningful work. For many people, having children is the most important and
meaningful thing they do. Although I am aware that this is impossible
to prove, I believe that evolution has made us desire to have strongly
children, much like a high-Mission (to use your terminology).
Of course, the argument against is that feelings and emotions
people have about their children are all from the social programming.
For the record, I believe 100% that the programming of the company massively
influences almost everything we do, including our decisions have
kids. SP is obviously responsible for many stupid things as men do
buying a woman a massive engagement ring. However, there is more to this
just as SP.
Having children really affects men physiologically. You can learn more about
that here. I bring this up not as evidence that children who made you more
happy, but to illustrate that there is something more going on here. Having
children affects men at a very deep level. If you think having children is
one for men "Integrated Mission" (what I do), then the logic is as follows
who have children will lead to at least some degree of unhappiness and
sorry, while having the lead at a certain level of happiness and
Satisfaction. Overall, it can be assumed intelligently face
negative aspects of having children (as we discussed), to have children
should
increase your long-term happiness.
*Black Dragon:*
To quote your article: * "When men have more sperm donation to a
pregnancy ... they are called crazy. The condition describes the future
fathers ...
which are struck by a combination of weight gain, nausea, food
cravings, backaches, insomnia ... the testosterone level drops a father
also by
about a third on average in the first three weeks after her child
born."*
This makes men happier?
My evolution conceived me to fertilize as much as possible before women
I die. If I did like the caveman in BC 50,000, or a farmer in the 16
century, it would be a good idea. If I did today, alimony
bankrupt me and literally destroy my life. Evolution is not
problem. long-term happiness and modern realities.
I do not mean having children will not cause any trouble. It may for some
Men. I said that having children will damage your long-term happiness
(despite
* * Moments of joy), and if you add all the unhappiness that you will
experience
over the years 18-20ish * * (at least!), it will be much more unhappy
all the regret that you might feel if you have children, then you live
a great life, be free and happy man.
I'm not telling men to never have children. I mean, if you really want
children,
you can not bullshit you with a kind of guys right Disney
fancy. * You must understand that your * average levels of happiness
will take a significant blow for about 20 years. Do it if you want,
but boy, you better want those little bastards so badly that you do
* * mind decades of happiness in general reduced.
Finish this thesis. Make your final statement (you can meet one of
above if you wish), and we'll let the public decide.
* Fred *
Really, BD? recap:
Fred: "I bring this [Article] to * not * as proof that children who have
you happier ... "
BD answer: "To quote your article .... This makes men happier? "
RE: EVOLUTION- It is very relevant. Evolution is why we are
we are. However, your point about evolution is irrelevant. No
we are suggesting to have dozens of children with several women.
I'll leave the rest of my arguments hold only in writing.
BD, thank you for the debate; I liked that! Also, thank you for your
Blog. It certainly helped to shape some of my views and changed the way I
see the world.
Fred thank you for a lively debate!
The rest now, you can leave comments as to who you thought won, plus any
other matters that should have been implemented. Having children is
extremely
significant and warrants further examination subject.
The post Pua Mgtow Great Debate 4: Having children makes you happy or not?
first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits] Welcome, everyone, to the
Fourth Pua Mgtow great debate! Today, "Fred" not my debate on
I argue that having children makes you less happy in the long run. As
still, both joined us the character limit for each 1700
reply.
The specific topic will discuss today:
* Having children intelligently makes men happier in the long run,
Not less.*
Fred FOR debate, I argue AGAINST.
Fred's comments will be blue like this. My comments will be in the usual
black font.
As always, I'll let Fred start and finish the debate with his comments. AT
the end, you can decide who won.
* THE BATTLE BEGINS !!! *
* Fred *
Thank you for accepting the debate. Let's start. Before entering
details, I would like to emphasize some starting points for
debate. I guess you'll have no problem with them:
1. There are very stupid ways to have children, such as hitting your
girlfriend when you're 15. Obviously, this is not conducive to long-term
happiness, and I do not want to discuss this situation.
2. I considered view of man here. Much of what we
discuss also apply to women, but I think we can keep it simple,
by not discussing men.
3. There are important and significant negative positive aspects to have
children. My argument is that the positives outweigh the negatives when
you have kids in a smart way, making you happier in the long run.
Your argument is that, regardless of how it is done, the negatives outweigh
the positives when you have children, making you less happy in the long
run. Correct?
Fred -Fanciful
*Black Dragon:*
I agree with your three parameters.
This is not my argument that the negatives outweigh the positives, as
each will have a different opinion on what is "positive" or
"Negative" and how much each value is his.
A straight, conservative, religious Alpha Male 1.0 can
consider having five children as a huge net positive (leaving a legacy,
do the will of God, having little minions to boss around, prove to the world
his penis works, etc.), even if it makes him less happy together
because of the extreme amount of work, cost, sacrifice and stress
places on himself, his finances, his wife, and his marriage. It is clearly
* *
less happy together that a man like me, but that did not matter to him.
It will still tell you that it's worth it because there are more positive
(in
their eyes). (And we did not discuss when that man is divorced, which
is statistically unlikely in the modern era, and must pay alimony for five *
children * or go to jail.)
My argument is that having children makes you less happy, on average, over
the
Overall, over a period of about 15-20 years, until the children grow up and
let. Because it does. Almost all the studies they've done on this subject
indicated. Almost all married couples with children I see will
through it; intense moments of joy followed by hours or even days
irritation and a lot of work, as I explained here. As with long-term
monogamy, this misfortune occurs regardless of "how you do it. " It is
inherent in the system. Having children is hard work, hard, which is
usually not
fun for mom or dad.
* Fred *
Hey BD
Just to make sure we're on the same page, I'll try to summarize what you
wrote:
- A person who consults huge positive aspects of having children (such as
leaving a legacy) that the negatives outweigh is incorrectly
weigh the positives and negatives. His life every day will be less
happy (because of the negative aspects), although he will not see it that
way
because it weighs the positives too strongly. Is it a
accurate summary of what you think?
- The main negative to have children: the extreme amount of work,
cost, the sacrifice and the stress it imposes on himself, his finances, his
wife,
and his marriage. And maybe pay alimony. All other things
add here?
- Your proof that having children makes you unhappy is 1) studies on this
subject and 2) your personal experience and the experience of others
you know. Is it correct?
- The graphic and written, to have children of your "How Happiness
Blog work over time "is your personal opinion, correct? It's not
on the basis of a study?
Fred -Fragile
*Black Dragon:*
1. No, it does not hurt weighing positive or negative. It is instead
placing his own happiness as a lower priority than other things.
So if he says, "Having children makes me happier," it is wrong. If, he said,
"Okay, well BD, having children makes me less happy, but I do not care
because
X and Y, "then it is okay. My only problem is happiness here.
In other words, you are more than welcome to defend or encourage lifestyles
you made less happy, but you can not tell me these lifestyles you
happier, because they do not.
2. Yes, that is a fairly comprehensive list. Regarding one of the elements,
remember
"Sacrifice" means always want to do things with your life that you are
unable to do so, because of the children. So many men who are fathers wish
they
could do so many things, but can not. Add to that everything else in this
list and you have a good amount of misfortune, even if you
the largest relative to Earth and your kids are the best kids in the world.
3. Correct. However, I would not describe my personal experience awareness
Children constantly miserable or unhappy. A little less happy if I did not
have children. The vast majority of mothers and fathers, if you have a
little alcohol in them and put them in a separate room away from
everyone knew that, quietly admit the same.
4. Correct, my personal opinion / extrapolation. However, I * highly * trust
if you give this chart to a qualified researcher in this field, they
would more or less agree with her.
* Fred *
1. Okay, I think I understand your point here.
2. We agree here
3. studies on this subject are almost irrelevant because they reflect
the average person. The average person is:
- A) * Broke / In Debt * - talk about stress! I can not imagine anything
more
scary as having children I can not be able to feed. The average person
is essentially living paycheck. There is a ton of data about it.
Here is a source.
- B) * Work work crappy 9-5 * Office - Super stressful. Your boss may
take a shit about you every day, but you can not cut off the only source of
income when you have kids. Great way to reduce your happiness.
- C) * In a less traditional sex (or low sex) marriage * - Ugh. You have
covered this enough on your blog, but again, the theme here is that
the average person feels trapped (in this case, sexually).
- D) * have children in their 20s or early 30 * - You guessed trapped.
You want to do something different and amazing with your life, but you are
financially trapped by your children.
The average person is less happy to have children? No they are shit-
completely trapped financially and sexually. What misery! Fortunately
there are ways will not leave. As you said, it is ideal for large
financial shape, hire a full-time nanny to help accomplish many of your
major life goals (first prob means having children in your 40s), and
non-monogamous marriage and premarital parenting plan. Happiness is
usually on the elimination of negative and positive creation. A study
with people with children would be smarter to show an increase of happiness,
because they face very few problems "average person."
*Black Dragon:*
Yeah, I know that the average person sucks, I do not know if you quote me or
make an argument. So your argument is children do not make a man less happy
if he does all of the following:
- Hiring a nanny (part time or full time?)
- Is able to easily afford a nanny (nannies are expensive)
- Do not * children until 40
- Is it regularly banging other women besides his wife
- A marriage contract and a parenting plan (if married, he did not even need
to be married?)
Yes or no?
If so, I will continue to discuss the above items.
If not, please tell me exactly * * and * * with details that "having
children
intelligently "means.
* Fred *
I quote and make an argument. The point here is that you claim
that the "average person sucks" and yet you use comprehensive studies of
the average
people to show why an Alpha 2.0 (in this case, which means that someone to
have children
intelligently) will be unhappy to have children. The studies (which are your
The main argument for why having children make you miserable) are not valid
for
how you propose (and I agree with) to have children.
And yes, the points you listed are how I (and you, I think) see
specificities of "having children smarter. "
To answer your questions:
- full-time nanny would be ideal
- Babysitters are expensive, but are not necessarily expensive. I met
live in au pair, the other day, and she continues to eat / board + $ 1,500
a month.
- To keep things simple, let's married with a prenup / parenting plan. I
know every state has different laws (some with common law
marriage) that make this complex. You have already discussed the ideal
ways to marry.
I have another main point of discussion, but I would like to address the
first point.
*Black Dragon:*
I agree that the statistics to which I refer are looking (mostly) normal
people who
do most of the bad things in life, so we'll pass it.
You have confirmed that the education of children "smarter" means that you
hire a
full-time nanny. You just said, hilarious, that pay a nanny $ 1500
month * more * provide her full-time room and board is not "cheap. "This
is ridiculous, I completely disagree, and I think the vast majority of
people who read it would be as well. Very few men, even the Alpha 2.0 is
that
make the recommendation $ 75 000 per year, will be able to easily
this.
So yes, I agree that if you are rich and can easily allow * *
Full-time, broadcast live in nanny to raise your children for you
screaming, it can not
damage your long-term happiness I describe normally. I have already said it
so in this article here, where I described how these types
problems do not apply to rich people. Rich people can have after divorce
Divorce can have several children out of wedlock, can get STDs, and
all kinds of problems that affect them as they affect non-rich
people. It is another world.
But if you think this option is available for the typical guy there
Next (or try to follow) the lifestyle recommended I speak
(Alpha Male 2.0), again, even if it is recommended $ 75 000 per year
then you are wrong.
* Fred *
Haha yes, $ 1,500 is "expensive". What I wanted to say that $ 1,500 a month
is a
good value as you get a 24/7/365 full-time nanny.
As you have mentioned, of course not reasonable if you make 75K
one year. But go, BD, you're nitpicking here. As I said, full-time
nanny is ideal. But what can we do to 75K a year? obviously
they can help as well. How about hiring a student to help
$ 10 per hour for a few days a week? Maybe it goes to $ 480 per month ($
480 =
$ 10 / hour x 4 hours per day x 3 days per week x 4 weeks per month) or $
5760 per
year. Not cheap, but reasonable for someone who makes 75K.
Or maybe you think this is not enough help and / or money. Perhaps the
recommended amount of income per year should be a little more 75K.
Again, I think everything is fussy. Unless you have you
nothing else to add related to your studies quoted are not valid or
specific intelligently have children, I would go to my next main
point.
*Black Dragon:*
This nanny thing was your idea, not mine. I'm still trying to nail
your specific definition of having children "intelligently. "You have
clearly said
above was to hire full-time, live in nanny. Now you move the goal
post and that he be paid a student for a few hours per week.
I can not answer your point if you keep changing your definition
"clever."
Please give me your final definition, very specific to raise children
"Cleverly" is. Then when I address, do not change.
* Fred *
Haha, you are definitely getting bogged down in details here. As I have
said from the beginning, the smartest and most ideal for
children is to have a full time nanny.
Just so we're on the same page:
- Yes, it is almost impossible if you only 75K per year.
- You can still do ok for yourself if you do that 75K per year (as I
described), but it's not ideal (not the smart way
kids)
- You set the number 75K, not me.
*Black Dragon:*
As I have said many times on my blog, you must obtain a specific agreement
definitions of words if you talk about a subject, or get you anywhere. It is
not a "detail". is your definition of "intelligently" raise children
important to this discussion; Indeed, it is all about here.
Your assertion is that "intelligently" raising children needs a full time,
live-in nanny. I agree it would offset most or all of your misfortune.
The problem is that the majority of VAST men read these words will not
to have this ability, making your entire invalid item, or at least
very, * very * small. I think I won that round. But I'll let readers
decide.
At your next point, if you had one.
* Fred *
Let's recap:
1. You asked that studies show that people are less happy when they
kids. I have shown that these studies are not valid. * But you still have
not
provided no evidence demonstrating that people are less happy. * This is
needed to "win" this turn.
2. I said that people will be much happier if that studies show
they have kids smarter (meaning they are large financial A.
Complete Form B. major life goals first (prob have children in your 40s)
C have not monogamous marriage w / + prenup parenting plan D. hire a full
nanny time. We agree that these 4 items you will do much
happier when you have children. You nitpicked one of these 4 articles and
said that now my whole point is invalid.
This is illogical. My whole argument is not undermined by a niggling
point, it is only slightly less strong. Your average reader (who was
never a condition to start, but let's go with it) can reach 85% say
having children smarter, and always will be much better than average
people in the studies.
Why has it to be full-time nanny or nothing? This does not
meaning. You can still get all A-C and a D (having a part-time
nanny) on 75K annually. You can get 100% A-D on a higher salary.
In addition, your current argument is non-existent; it is just nitpicking
One of my points, suggesting that it cancels everything. Answer please
exactly what your argument is why you will be unhappy to have children,
and explain how the average reader will not be able to achieve 100% (but can
to 85%) have children smarter invalidate the whole argument.
*Black Dragon:*
The studies include normal people who tend to suck; they are not invalid.
Yes
they were invalid, you would be able to offer all kinds of easy to do * *
Things to avoid * * misfortune happened, not difficult as hiring a
full-time nanny.
If one of your requirements is 4 full time, live in nanny, yes, your points
is invalid because it applies only to a small group of men.
If your point is the nanny is only 15% (!) Happiness
won, it's laughable. An Alpha Male 2.0 in great shape with protection
finance and non-monogamy is * still * will suffer significantly reduced
* Set * happiness in having children. Freedom, peace, travel, your daily
calendar, sex, life, low-cost, living abroad (if you want), sleep,
focus on your mission, * ALL * of these things are negatively affected to
some degree when to have children. It is true when they are small, so when
they are teenagers (but not quite as good). Then, after the age of 18, you
always *
* Have things like college fees, helping them get cars, helping them to get
jobs, helping them to settle in life, helping them to get through their
problems, and, and, and. There are so many ways your
the overall level of happiness decreases in some way, I can not even begin
to list
right here.
Saying that most of this shit is off just because you're not fat and can
Fucking other women who will not. How banging on FB using side when the
baby screaming in the middle of the night, when the 9-year needs
help with homework, when the old year just crashed his car 17?
I agree lifestyle Alpha 2.0 * help * fixed but not even 50% of this
reduces happiness.
* Fred *
* 1. * Here's what laughable- you have already accepted that the studies
were
irrelevant, and now you have changed your mind.
2. laughable- Also, you continue to claim that child care is a binary
problem. nanny full time vs. no nanny. It is not binary. There is a
spectrum of care solutions. A part-time nanny + do everything else
smarter you get about 85% of the way. Each person can
add or subtract hours childcare as they see fit.
3. Your evidence is still lacking. You simply listed negative
aspects of having children. The debate is not "Are there negatives
to have children? "Obviously, there are negative aspects of having
children. In
to "win" the debate, you must prove that the negative (happiness
decrease) in priority areas on the positive (increasing happiness).
4. Other aspects (AC) to have children are not smart
insignificant. In fact, the # 1 complaint from most of my friends who
children in an "unintelligent way" is that they are not able to kiss other
women.
5. When you are in your 40s, it's not so hard to do
much more than 75K per year. You have 20 years of work experience
At this point. I guess the majority of your readers who are over 40 are
making it much more than 75K per year.
6. Perhaps part of the problem is your outlook on children in general. A lot
people watch "help find a job, helping them to settle in life,
helping them to solve their problems "as positive (happiness) more things
where they appreciate the opportunity to help their mentor children.
Anyway, at this stage, it seems we turn our wheels here. I would like
as pass.
*Black Dragon:*
Let us then. Proceed.
* Fred *
I know we both agree that, in life, lots of happiness is derived to
meaningful work. For many people, having children is the most important and
meaningful thing they do. Although I am aware that this is impossible
to prove, I believe that evolution has made us desire to have strongly
children, much like a high-Mission (to use your terminology).
Of course, the argument against is that feelings and emotions
people have about their children are all from the social programming.
For the record, I believe 100% that the programming of the company massively
influences almost everything we do, including our decisions have
kids. SP is obviously responsible for many stupid things as men do
buying a woman a massive engagement ring. However, there is more to this
just as SP.
Having children really affects men physiologically. You can learn more about
that here. I bring this up not as evidence that children who made you more
happy, but to illustrate that there is something more going on here. Having
children affects men at a very deep level. If you think having children is
one for men "Integrated Mission" (what I do), then the logic is as follows
who have children will lead to at least some degree of unhappiness and
sorry, while having the lead at a certain level of happiness and
Satisfaction. Overall, it can be assumed intelligently face
negative aspects of having children (as we discussed), to have children
should
increase your long-term happiness.
*Black Dragon:*
To quote your article: * "When men have more sperm donation to a
pregnancy ... they are called crazy. The condition describes the future
fathers ...
which are struck by a combination of weight gain, nausea, food
cravings, backaches, insomnia ... the testosterone level drops a father
also by
about a third on average in the first three weeks after her child
born."*
This makes men happier?
My evolution conceived me to fertilize as much as possible before women
I die. If I did like the caveman in BC 50,000, or a farmer in the 16
century, it would be a good idea. If I did today, alimony
bankrupt me and literally destroy my life. Evolution is not
problem. long-term happiness and modern realities.
I do not mean having children will not cause any trouble. It may for some
Men. I said that having children will damage your long-term happiness
(despite
* * Moments of joy), and if you add all the unhappiness that you will
experience
over the years 18-20ish * * (at least!), it will be much more unhappy
all the regret that you might feel if you have children, then you live
a great life, be free and happy man.
I'm not telling men to never have children. I mean, if you really want
children,
you can not bullshit you with a kind of guys right Disney
fancy. * You must understand that your * average levels of happiness
will take a significant blow for about 20 years. Do it if you want,
but boy, you better want those little bastards so badly that you do
* * mind decades of happiness in general reduced.
Finish this thesis. Make your final statement (you can meet one of
above if you wish), and we'll let the public decide.
* Fred *
Really, BD? recap:
Fred: "I bring this [Article] to * not * as proof that children who have
you happier ... "
BD answer: "To quote your article .... This makes men happier? "
RE: EVOLUTION- It is very relevant. Evolution is why we are
we are. However, your point about evolution is irrelevant. No
we are suggesting to have dozens of children with several women.
I'll leave the rest of my arguments hold only in writing.
BD, thank you for the debate; I liked that! Also, thank you for your
Blog. It certainly helped to shape some of my views and changed the way I
see the world.
Fred thank you for a lively debate!
The rest now, you can leave comments as to who you thought won, plus any
other matters that should have been implemented. Having children is
extremely
significant and warrants further examination subject.
The post Pua Mgtow Great Debate 4: Having children makes you happy or not?
first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
Bill O'Reilly harassment
[Image: First date advice first date online, online dating advice, which
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits]
Normally I do not like to analyze current events like this, but one of today
exception. I find the whole thing extremely fascinating Bill O'Reilly and
I thought about it lately.
For those of you outside the US or who do not follow the news recently
was released a Conservative political commentator known nationally on Fox
News, Bill O'Reilly has been sexually harassing women in aggressive enough
means, and has done for many years. He and Fox News have
to pay $ 19 million in settlements for many women. There was also
audio recording make it this kind of things in 2004. Most of the time, it
was
guilty of hitting on women at work with the promise of jobs and / or
career advancement if these women have set out.
Now the bill is in trouble. Fox News lost millions because advertisers are
pulling, and it now appears that the bill was drawn. (Though
frankly, because it is one of the elite, it will be fine, no matter what
come. The law does not apply to the elite, and I'm sure he'll get
millions and millions of dollars price as output.)
Now erase it all. Let's go to the interesting part.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question that I already know the answer.
Think carefully before answering, and I'll tell you the good
answer in a minute.
Ready? Okay. If you were physically unattractive, but nationally were
millions famous and worth millions of dollars, you would have
struggling to put with chicks at least reasonably warm? Even without*
pay whores?
Think about it.
You have your answer? Okay.
The answer is no, you will have trouble getting laid
reasonably hot chicks if you were rich and famous that even if you were
old and / or ugly. Trust me on this. I met him two or three men like this,
and
I know several people who personally know or work with people like this.
Believe me, those ugly / old / gross men, but the rich and famous have no
problem
* Be dismissed at all, * and with hot chicks or reasonably warm.
They did not need to pay whores either. I said they are not * need * to.
They
* Can * wages whores, and some of them "for fun" or if they have a
preference for bitches. My bro knocks Charlie Sheen bitches all the time,
but only because he loves, not because he needs it. In other words,
Whores is an option for these men, but they do not need.
I could give you some examples of the real life of men I have personally
met more
in recent years, but since I was at least a semi-public figure, I
want to get someone in trouble. So instead, I'll give you a very dated and
for example a bit hypothetical.
Back in the 90s, I briefly worked with Danny DeVito and his staff. It was
married at the time and I have no evidence he ever cheated.
Regardless, I can tell you for a fact 100% that Danny would have been hot
chicks lined up outside her house ready for the kiss, despite the fact that
was the negative trifecta winner: short, fat and ugly. He was confident,
funny,
And ridiculously rich world famous. (He made tens of millions of
dollars on the film Twins * * alone.) I bet $ 10,000 of my own money
if he wanted to go out and hit a bomb, it could have done,
and without pay.
This leads to poor Bill O'Reilly. As I always heard all these
crazy stories hitting him for many women to work, (supposedly)
by providing jobs, then (supposedly) deny them jobs when they have not
to (supposedly) calling on the phone while masturbating,
(Supposedly) by giving them all sorts of talking dirty when they were
clearly not
interested ... I mean, the hell-thinking it?
* Dude, you're Bill O'Reilly. * You are world famous and worth nearly $ 100
million. If you want to put, you can snap your fingers and do it,
even without paying whores. (Although the payment whores is definitely an
option
for the bill as well, but I understand how some men, including myself, can
see having sex with prostitutes as a little ugly.)
Why the hell you harass women at work, which is the most dangerous
place to pick up chicks? You did not know this shit would bite
you in the ass? It is no longer 1952, man! You can not get away with it
stuff these days, at least not if you do it many, * many times, with many
different women.
Why on earth do you use the most calibrated approaches I have ever seen?
You are Bill O'Reilly. You are rich, famous, confident Alpha. Even if
you look old or whatever, you can just go to a party and have nearly
your choice of the room (at least in women who are not hardcore
leftists). Why do not mind even offer women the working career
advancement? You do not have to!
That's what I thought as I continued to read and hear these stories. Why
is a famous rich, powerful, confident, caring man begging for women
sex at work using methods of the carrot and stick for children five years? I
get a little lost without money and fame do it, but a rich and famous
celebrity like Bill O'Reilly? WTF?
It does not mean anything. O'Reilly should have some sort of huge mental
block about
this. Here are my theories to explain why I think it voluntarily, and
without
reason, took the most difficult and dangerous road for sex I can think
of. Feel free to add to my list in the comments if you have a theory I
did not come with.
* Theory 1: * There is a guy from the old school who grew up at a time when
it's just that powerful men did; provide career advancement in exchange
for sex. That's why Roger Ailes did, and it seems that Bill Cosby was
guilty of some of that too. O'Reilly is nine years younger than wings, but
it is close enough probably in the generations which make it seem "normal"
to him.
* Theory 2: * O'Reilly saw tons of other guys in the news industry are
doing this,
and it was simply a victim of thinking of the group. He grew up in his
career
thinking it was somehow "easier" to harass female colleagues as finding
easy sex outside the office. I heard the theory that the bill from
did not get super success later in life, he has not had much
on benchmarking experience for women until it was too late. I imagine
it's possible.
* Theory 3: * * This method worked, * and we just hear about the
five or six women, it * does * work, maybe when there are five or
six (or ten or twenty!) women where that shit worked and Bill has indeed
to get laid. Maybe Bill has hit women all over Fox News, and women
are now terrified to admit it according to what is happening now (and
to their current career and / or threatening marriages).
* Theory 4: * Just never occurred to him. Maybe O'Reilly was such
an island workaholic (who seems to be his personality, according to his
divorce and other things in his personal life) that has simply never
says that, "Hey, I'm rich and famous! I could go get some
serious pussy every moment of the weekend, I do! "The only women in his
circle of life were those in the workplace; for him, there were no other
women. I find
it's hard to believe this theory is correct, but I must admit that it is
possible,
since I have met men in the business world with tunnel vision very narrow
like that.
* Theory 5: * He's so hyper arrogant that he thinks he can do what he
wants and never get caught. This seems to be the most popular theory,
but it's not exactly one goal, since it is generally the theory
trotted by people who hated Bill O'Reilly first.
However, I must admit that it is certainly possible. Regardless, it does
explain why it did not focus on all women * * outside the workplace.
* Theory 6: * It * has * bangs women outside the workplace * and * in
the workplace, and we just heard those in the workplace that has not
do exercises. Maybe my entire premise is wrong, and the bill was
super player all this time, quietly asked left and right, both
inside and outside of his work. It is possible, but unlikely.
* Theory 7: * It is a kind of disorder sweet personality, the times
he works with a hot chick, it becomes extremely hot and just can not
control himself, even if he knows it logically do in big trouble.
I met some men like this, so it is possible.
* Theory 8: * It has a fetish colleague. This is the simplest explanation.
Most of us have at least a round or two on Weird. (I really like short
women.) Perhaps fetish / fantasy Bill is banged the women with whom he
works. May be
sex with a non-colleague is not sexually exciting to him at all.
Anyway, I could speculate forever. I think it's really amazing how
some men go out of their way to pursue sex in the most difficult and / or
Possible dangerous ways, when there are so many other, safer, easier
own avenues to get to sex.
What a crazy world we live in.
The post Bill O'Reilly Harassment first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits]
Normally I do not like to analyze current events like this, but one of today
exception. I find the whole thing extremely fascinating Bill O'Reilly and
I thought about it lately.
For those of you outside the US or who do not follow the news recently
was released a Conservative political commentator known nationally on Fox
News, Bill O'Reilly has been sexually harassing women in aggressive enough
means, and has done for many years. He and Fox News have
to pay $ 19 million in settlements for many women. There was also
audio recording make it this kind of things in 2004. Most of the time, it
was
guilty of hitting on women at work with the promise of jobs and / or
career advancement if these women have set out.
Now the bill is in trouble. Fox News lost millions because advertisers are
pulling, and it now appears that the bill was drawn. (Though
frankly, because it is one of the elite, it will be fine, no matter what
come. The law does not apply to the elite, and I'm sure he'll get
millions and millions of dollars price as output.)
Now erase it all. Let's go to the interesting part.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question that I already know the answer.
Think carefully before answering, and I'll tell you the good
answer in a minute.
Ready? Okay. If you were physically unattractive, but nationally were
millions famous and worth millions of dollars, you would have
struggling to put with chicks at least reasonably warm? Even without*
pay whores?
Think about it.
You have your answer? Okay.
The answer is no, you will have trouble getting laid
reasonably hot chicks if you were rich and famous that even if you were
old and / or ugly. Trust me on this. I met him two or three men like this,
and
I know several people who personally know or work with people like this.
Believe me, those ugly / old / gross men, but the rich and famous have no
problem
* Be dismissed at all, * and with hot chicks or reasonably warm.
They did not need to pay whores either. I said they are not * need * to.
They
* Can * wages whores, and some of them "for fun" or if they have a
preference for bitches. My bro knocks Charlie Sheen bitches all the time,
but only because he loves, not because he needs it. In other words,
Whores is an option for these men, but they do not need.
I could give you some examples of the real life of men I have personally
met more
in recent years, but since I was at least a semi-public figure, I
want to get someone in trouble. So instead, I'll give you a very dated and
for example a bit hypothetical.
Back in the 90s, I briefly worked with Danny DeVito and his staff. It was
married at the time and I have no evidence he ever cheated.
Regardless, I can tell you for a fact 100% that Danny would have been hot
chicks lined up outside her house ready for the kiss, despite the fact that
was the negative trifecta winner: short, fat and ugly. He was confident,
funny,
And ridiculously rich world famous. (He made tens of millions of
dollars on the film Twins * * alone.) I bet $ 10,000 of my own money
if he wanted to go out and hit a bomb, it could have done,
and without pay.
This leads to poor Bill O'Reilly. As I always heard all these
crazy stories hitting him for many women to work, (supposedly)
by providing jobs, then (supposedly) deny them jobs when they have not
to (supposedly) calling on the phone while masturbating,
(Supposedly) by giving them all sorts of talking dirty when they were
clearly not
interested ... I mean, the hell-thinking it?
* Dude, you're Bill O'Reilly. * You are world famous and worth nearly $ 100
million. If you want to put, you can snap your fingers and do it,
even without paying whores. (Although the payment whores is definitely an
option
for the bill as well, but I understand how some men, including myself, can
see having sex with prostitutes as a little ugly.)
Why the hell you harass women at work, which is the most dangerous
place to pick up chicks? You did not know this shit would bite
you in the ass? It is no longer 1952, man! You can not get away with it
stuff these days, at least not if you do it many, * many times, with many
different women.
Why on earth do you use the most calibrated approaches I have ever seen?
You are Bill O'Reilly. You are rich, famous, confident Alpha. Even if
you look old or whatever, you can just go to a party and have nearly
your choice of the room (at least in women who are not hardcore
leftists). Why do not mind even offer women the working career
advancement? You do not have to!
That's what I thought as I continued to read and hear these stories. Why
is a famous rich, powerful, confident, caring man begging for women
sex at work using methods of the carrot and stick for children five years? I
get a little lost without money and fame do it, but a rich and famous
celebrity like Bill O'Reilly? WTF?
It does not mean anything. O'Reilly should have some sort of huge mental
block about
this. Here are my theories to explain why I think it voluntarily, and
without
reason, took the most difficult and dangerous road for sex I can think
of. Feel free to add to my list in the comments if you have a theory I
did not come with.
* Theory 1: * There is a guy from the old school who grew up at a time when
it's just that powerful men did; provide career advancement in exchange
for sex. That's why Roger Ailes did, and it seems that Bill Cosby was
guilty of some of that too. O'Reilly is nine years younger than wings, but
it is close enough probably in the generations which make it seem "normal"
to him.
* Theory 2: * O'Reilly saw tons of other guys in the news industry are
doing this,
and it was simply a victim of thinking of the group. He grew up in his
career
thinking it was somehow "easier" to harass female colleagues as finding
easy sex outside the office. I heard the theory that the bill from
did not get super success later in life, he has not had much
on benchmarking experience for women until it was too late. I imagine
it's possible.
* Theory 3: * * This method worked, * and we just hear about the
five or six women, it * does * work, maybe when there are five or
six (or ten or twenty!) women where that shit worked and Bill has indeed
to get laid. Maybe Bill has hit women all over Fox News, and women
are now terrified to admit it according to what is happening now (and
to their current career and / or threatening marriages).
* Theory 4: * Just never occurred to him. Maybe O'Reilly was such
an island workaholic (who seems to be his personality, according to his
divorce and other things in his personal life) that has simply never
says that, "Hey, I'm rich and famous! I could go get some
serious pussy every moment of the weekend, I do! "The only women in his
circle of life were those in the workplace; for him, there were no other
women. I find
it's hard to believe this theory is correct, but I must admit that it is
possible,
since I have met men in the business world with tunnel vision very narrow
like that.
* Theory 5: * He's so hyper arrogant that he thinks he can do what he
wants and never get caught. This seems to be the most popular theory,
but it's not exactly one goal, since it is generally the theory
trotted by people who hated Bill O'Reilly first.
However, I must admit that it is certainly possible. Regardless, it does
explain why it did not focus on all women * * outside the workplace.
* Theory 6: * It * has * bangs women outside the workplace * and * in
the workplace, and we just heard those in the workplace that has not
do exercises. Maybe my entire premise is wrong, and the bill was
super player all this time, quietly asked left and right, both
inside and outside of his work. It is possible, but unlikely.
* Theory 7: * It is a kind of disorder sweet personality, the times
he works with a hot chick, it becomes extremely hot and just can not
control himself, even if he knows it logically do in big trouble.
I met some men like this, so it is possible.
* Theory 8: * It has a fetish colleague. This is the simplest explanation.
Most of us have at least a round or two on Weird. (I really like short
women.) Perhaps fetish / fantasy Bill is banged the women with whom he
works. May be
sex with a non-colleague is not sexually exciting to him at all.
Anyway, I could speculate forever. I think it's really amazing how
some men go out of their way to pursue sex in the most difficult and / or
Possible dangerous ways, when there are so many other, safer, easier
own avenues to get to sex.
What a crazy world we live in.
The post Bill O'Reilly Harassment first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
Want to take a magic pill to eliminate your need for sex?
[Image: First date advice first date online, online dating advice, which
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits]
A reader, Kyle, recently asked a very interesting question:
Here is a theoretical question, I'm curious to hear your response. Though
I think sex is probably the most pleasant thing to be a man, to
At the same time, I often found myself looking forward to old age and
that comes with it: my dick does not give a shit about women more. I have
often thought about how much time, money, and accomplishments that I would
have under my belt, if not for the pursuit of sex.
This TRT not only costs a good bit of money, but it also makes you want
More sex, which also equals more time and more money spent on women.
Imagine eating a meal and just be full for the rest of your life. Say
you can do with sex. Just be complete. No desire. Above. Would you like
consider it?
I remember when I was a young man starting out in the business
world. I am sitting at my desk one day, hard at work as always. From about
13 hours, I was hungry and had to stop and eat. It pissed me I had
fantastic break my flow of work to do something as stupid and primitive
while eating.
So I pulled away from my computer, my backpack caught and released my
lunch, grumbling all the way. I turned to my friend and said, "You know,
eating is a nuisance ".
She thought for a minute, began nodded and said, "Yes. Eating is a
nuisance."
"I prefer to work right," I said. "Now I have to stop and eat just because
my
body needs food stupid? This is bullshit. This is stupid. Look at all the
time
and effort we spend looking for food, eat food, worrying about food.
Man, what nuisance ".
I'm much more at peace with the human body needs for food these days. As
I have already said, men in their 20s, as I was at the time, tend to be
Bitchy, touchy-stress balls. However, I still agree in general with the
the feeling that eating is kind of a pain in the ass.
Kyle is to say, or at least ask the same thing about sex. Yes,
we want sex. Yes, we love sex. But if we did not need or desire when
all?
This is a complex issue that must be addressed more
different angles.
* The lack of function does not mean a lack of desire *
Before answering this question, we must come to a mistaken assumption
within the question itself. Kyle said that one of the reasons why it is
looking forward to an old man because he will not want sex.
His body will probably not be able to have sex (we assume), therefore,
do not want sex at all. During this time, the stress and anxiety around sex
and
women ... gone! Is not that nice?
I heard this view expressed by other men. It's a nice thought, but it is
Incorrect. Just because your sex or the body does not work well enough to
have
sex does not mean you will not want sex. You will always.
I already talked to old men in rut, I saw it in business meetings
and in grocery stores. These are really, really old guy who lost
ability to have sex there is a very long time (even things like Viagra will
not
help them), but they are still as hot as teenagers. They are shameless
comments against women and even do things like take their butts. (And these
old bastards are often with her, because women consider them "old harmless
men. "If you or I did such a thing, we would go to jail.)
I saw the same thing with injured vets who are trapped in
wheelchairs and lose the ability to have sex. Believe me, these guys
always want to have sex just as bad as you or me, if not more.
Therefore, this fantasy that one day you will be "too old to want sex" is
not
very probable. It is possible I suppose, since the levels of testosterone
and sex
Indeed drive declines with age, but I have met too many very old men
(Over 80 years) who are just as excited as any other type, or cock that
works
do not. You may not be able to have sex, but chances are very good that
you want again.
* You will be able to "take a pill" One day *
Another angle is that in our lives, you will be well able to * *
take a pill (or get a shot, or engaging in other simple medical
procedure) that is rewriting your DNA or rewrite your brain
neurons thus not in fact desire sex at all, if that's what you really
want to. Then Kyle hypothetical will not soon be hypothetical; his
will be part of everyday life.
With technologies such as CRISPR, you will be able to design or modify your
body almost as desired. If you want to cure your alcoholism
or go to 8% body fat, you will be able to take a pill or inject something
and in a few weeks, boom, you're there. This is even * before * viable
nanotechnology (we should have in place by 2040). As I speak
much to my other blog, people have no idea of the magnitude of change
who come to the human condition, and very soon (although
in our life).
The problem here is that, as I mentioned in detail here, sex is good for
you physically and mentally. If you stop having sex, you will end up
suffer from mental and physical problems. Go read this article for details.
An argument against-that in the future when you can "take
pill "and remove your sexual desire, by then, we should be able to fix or
mitigate the negative physical lack of sex also. It probably is
true. However, these are still issues that need to be taken into account.
Today, if you go without sex, it's bad for you to some extent, period.
Thus, the hypothetical must be changed to say: "If you could take a pill
that would remove your sexual desire and you have zero or mental
physical side effects of never having sex, would you do it? "
* Yes, Have a high sex drive can be a problem *
I recognized many times that I consider to have a higher than average
libido is a slight disadvantage in life. I have a sex drive that is much
higher than most men, and I am so all my life (or at least
since I lost my virginity in my early 20s). Just like my shit down
metabolism, strong sexual desire is something I had to learn to
manage and integrate with my long-term happy, Alpha Male life 2.0.
Fortunately
for me, I had my sex life "manipulated" (as Eben Pagan said) about eight
or nine years ago, so today it is not a problem. My life FB Alpha 2.0
and MLTR (and these days, and a OLTR FB) is more than enough to handle any
sexual desires I have. I have sex at least three times a week, every week,
and have done for nearly ten years. I literally never droughts.
Yet I admit that there were times that I was jealous of men with normal
sexual urges. I see guys go without sex for a month or more and not
seem bothered at all. I think, "Man, that would be good. for just
so close for a while so I can concentrate on the job ".
As I write this, I'm in my second week in Shanghai. As I
usually have sex when I travel abroad (this is the only time I'm too
happy to think about it), and as I'm not attracted to Chinese women
I have not had sex in about 10 days. This is an unusually long amount
time for me to go without sex. And yes, I begin to "feel" a
little. It would be nice not to feel this urge.
I also get semi-regular emails guys who are worried, they have no sex
lead, and what to do about it. I'm always amused by this. I ask them what
the problem is, and I often joke that I'd like to have this "problem".
My answer to those people is to ask them if they have another negative
symptoms, such as lack of sleep, poor motivation in life, laziness, bad
temper,
or similar problems. If the answer is yes, I tell them to get a little blood
tests and maybe see a doctor. But if they say no, I say not
not worry about it and focus on their happy life. If you are really happy,
there is no need to change anything.
It is also true that the TRT will will increase your libido, even if
Your sex drive was already high to begin with. As I mentioned in my
messages about this, my libido has actually increased, even if it was
already high. For the first months of TRT, I felt like a voracious sex
monster, and my already high level of sexual activity increased
significantly.
However, as always, I built it in my lifestyle and now it is fine. His
become my new normal. (Thank you God, I am not a Beta or Alpha monogamous
1.0
or I would have a serious problem of life on my hands. absolute sexual
Monogamy can * not * work for the man of high sex drive, or woman for that
material.)
But yes, to be clear, with a high libido is indeed a drawback
life because it forces you to take time and additional efforts to manage
this and
integrate this in your life, something most "normal" men
need to do, or at least will not be necessary to do so.
* A healthy sex drive is closely associated with other positive traits *
libido, at least the male type, is not a feature which is isolated from
everything else. Rather, it is almost always linked to other traits
will really help you in life, such as:
1. Higher levels of daily energy
2. A stronger drive to achieve the objectives (in business, fitness, women,
or
whatever)
3. A more optimistic view of the world and / or your own future
4. A more masculine personality and perhaps more confident (making you more
attractive to women, and to a degree, men as well)
This is exactly why I say Alpha Men promising monogamy are lying,
either to the woman or to themselves. Dynamic, motivated, confident,
male, men have generally been training more sex drive. It is
logged. One could almost think male libido not as a single line,
but as a line in a basket of other features that are hard-coded
together.
So if I "took a pill" that blasted my high zero sexual appetite, it would
also probably reduce my level of energy, drive, motivation and the joy of
living,
at least to the point where I and others noticed. Holy hell, that is
the last thing I want! These are the same traits that helped me
achieve my goals, and I'm going to need to hit future targets, which I
have a lot. It is these traits that give me the edge over most other men,
many are smarter and / or more handsome than me, but that normal
or lower sex drives.
It is true that in the future we might be able to manipulate the human brain
or DNA to "surgery" to remove any sex drive without disturbing anything
else in our personalities, but until that day arrives, it is extremely
dangerous to assume that sexual desire can or should be reduced because all
what happens is that you want less sex. No, your male readers will
also suffer. I've seen it with many men as they age, my father
included. Yes, the sex drive decreases, but the fact the general happiness
levels and the joy of living. No thanks.
* So I take this pill fuck? *
You will notice that I have not yet answered the question. It's because
I needed to provide all of the above context for my answer. Now that you
have this context, here is my answer.
Question 1: Do I take a pill that reduces my sexual desire for zero
rest of my life, so I never needed to worry about getting sex?
My answer: No, because I would lose other key aspects of my personality
which are extremely valuable and important to me. Keeping the high sexual
desire,
it causes even "overhead" in my life, is more than worth having
these positive traits.
Question 2: Okay, if the pill has eliminated your libido for the rest
of your life while allowing you to keep all these traits, and ensure
you will suffer * * negative physical or mental side effects?
My response: While I'm very tempted now, my answer is always no. Even if I
were
no sex drive, there would be scenarios I can imagine having in my future
I would want to have a sex drive and enjoy sex, even if a
a little moment.
For example, I really like riding on large super-fast roller coaster. I have
riding a lot and can not wait to get some more. If you waved a magic wand
and completely eliminated the desire of my personality, even if you kept
everything else the same, I'm sure I'd be a little sad, or
less affected, as are the emails I receive men worry that they
no sex drive. I remember the pleasure these coasters were, and I can
consider to want to want to go on again. So my answer is still no,
tempting that I admit is.
Question 3: Okay, okay. Let's say you can take this pill, but at
time, you can take an antidote that would return instantly up your sex
back to you. You can go "on" and "off" the pill whenever you like,
as much as you want, without side effects either, without affecting
any motivation or drive. Now, would you take?
My answer: Yes, now I take it. If I was 100% sure that it worked
how you say it would be in your case, and I have seen many other men
do successfully over several years (I * not * be a
early adopter; not even close), while I'd probably do it. The capacity
* * to temporarily switch off my sex drive would be a useful feature in my
body, provided the rest of my happy personality was motivated
unchanged.
Hopefully now you understand how the issue of male sex drive is not
simple as it seems. For now, I'll stick with it.
But hey, who knows what the future holds?
The message Would you take a magic pill to eliminate your need for sex?
first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
means
an open relationship, alpha male traits]
A reader, Kyle, recently asked a very interesting question:
Here is a theoretical question, I'm curious to hear your response. Though
I think sex is probably the most pleasant thing to be a man, to
At the same time, I often found myself looking forward to old age and
that comes with it: my dick does not give a shit about women more. I have
often thought about how much time, money, and accomplishments that I would
have under my belt, if not for the pursuit of sex.
This TRT not only costs a good bit of money, but it also makes you want
More sex, which also equals more time and more money spent on women.
Imagine eating a meal and just be full for the rest of your life. Say
you can do with sex. Just be complete. No desire. Above. Would you like
consider it?
I remember when I was a young man starting out in the business
world. I am sitting at my desk one day, hard at work as always. From about
13 hours, I was hungry and had to stop and eat. It pissed me I had
fantastic break my flow of work to do something as stupid and primitive
while eating.
So I pulled away from my computer, my backpack caught and released my
lunch, grumbling all the way. I turned to my friend and said, "You know,
eating is a nuisance ".
She thought for a minute, began nodded and said, "Yes. Eating is a
nuisance."
"I prefer to work right," I said. "Now I have to stop and eat just because
my
body needs food stupid? This is bullshit. This is stupid. Look at all the
time
and effort we spend looking for food, eat food, worrying about food.
Man, what nuisance ".
I'm much more at peace with the human body needs for food these days. As
I have already said, men in their 20s, as I was at the time, tend to be
Bitchy, touchy-stress balls. However, I still agree in general with the
the feeling that eating is kind of a pain in the ass.
Kyle is to say, or at least ask the same thing about sex. Yes,
we want sex. Yes, we love sex. But if we did not need or desire when
all?
This is a complex issue that must be addressed more
different angles.
* The lack of function does not mean a lack of desire *
Before answering this question, we must come to a mistaken assumption
within the question itself. Kyle said that one of the reasons why it is
looking forward to an old man because he will not want sex.
His body will probably not be able to have sex (we assume), therefore,
do not want sex at all. During this time, the stress and anxiety around sex
and
women ... gone! Is not that nice?
I heard this view expressed by other men. It's a nice thought, but it is
Incorrect. Just because your sex or the body does not work well enough to
have
sex does not mean you will not want sex. You will always.
I already talked to old men in rut, I saw it in business meetings
and in grocery stores. These are really, really old guy who lost
ability to have sex there is a very long time (even things like Viagra will
not
help them), but they are still as hot as teenagers. They are shameless
comments against women and even do things like take their butts. (And these
old bastards are often with her, because women consider them "old harmless
men. "If you or I did such a thing, we would go to jail.)
I saw the same thing with injured vets who are trapped in
wheelchairs and lose the ability to have sex. Believe me, these guys
always want to have sex just as bad as you or me, if not more.
Therefore, this fantasy that one day you will be "too old to want sex" is
not
very probable. It is possible I suppose, since the levels of testosterone
and sex
Indeed drive declines with age, but I have met too many very old men
(Over 80 years) who are just as excited as any other type, or cock that
works
do not. You may not be able to have sex, but chances are very good that
you want again.
* You will be able to "take a pill" One day *
Another angle is that in our lives, you will be well able to * *
take a pill (or get a shot, or engaging in other simple medical
procedure) that is rewriting your DNA or rewrite your brain
neurons thus not in fact desire sex at all, if that's what you really
want to. Then Kyle hypothetical will not soon be hypothetical; his
will be part of everyday life.
With technologies such as CRISPR, you will be able to design or modify your
body almost as desired. If you want to cure your alcoholism
or go to 8% body fat, you will be able to take a pill or inject something
and in a few weeks, boom, you're there. This is even * before * viable
nanotechnology (we should have in place by 2040). As I speak
much to my other blog, people have no idea of the magnitude of change
who come to the human condition, and very soon (although
in our life).
The problem here is that, as I mentioned in detail here, sex is good for
you physically and mentally. If you stop having sex, you will end up
suffer from mental and physical problems. Go read this article for details.
An argument against-that in the future when you can "take
pill "and remove your sexual desire, by then, we should be able to fix or
mitigate the negative physical lack of sex also. It probably is
true. However, these are still issues that need to be taken into account.
Today, if you go without sex, it's bad for you to some extent, period.
Thus, the hypothetical must be changed to say: "If you could take a pill
that would remove your sexual desire and you have zero or mental
physical side effects of never having sex, would you do it? "
* Yes, Have a high sex drive can be a problem *
I recognized many times that I consider to have a higher than average
libido is a slight disadvantage in life. I have a sex drive that is much
higher than most men, and I am so all my life (or at least
since I lost my virginity in my early 20s). Just like my shit down
metabolism, strong sexual desire is something I had to learn to
manage and integrate with my long-term happy, Alpha Male life 2.0.
Fortunately
for me, I had my sex life "manipulated" (as Eben Pagan said) about eight
or nine years ago, so today it is not a problem. My life FB Alpha 2.0
and MLTR (and these days, and a OLTR FB) is more than enough to handle any
sexual desires I have. I have sex at least three times a week, every week,
and have done for nearly ten years. I literally never droughts.
Yet I admit that there were times that I was jealous of men with normal
sexual urges. I see guys go without sex for a month or more and not
seem bothered at all. I think, "Man, that would be good. for just
so close for a while so I can concentrate on the job ".
As I write this, I'm in my second week in Shanghai. As I
usually have sex when I travel abroad (this is the only time I'm too
happy to think about it), and as I'm not attracted to Chinese women
I have not had sex in about 10 days. This is an unusually long amount
time for me to go without sex. And yes, I begin to "feel" a
little. It would be nice not to feel this urge.
I also get semi-regular emails guys who are worried, they have no sex
lead, and what to do about it. I'm always amused by this. I ask them what
the problem is, and I often joke that I'd like to have this "problem".
My answer to those people is to ask them if they have another negative
symptoms, such as lack of sleep, poor motivation in life, laziness, bad
temper,
or similar problems. If the answer is yes, I tell them to get a little blood
tests and maybe see a doctor. But if they say no, I say not
not worry about it and focus on their happy life. If you are really happy,
there is no need to change anything.
It is also true that the TRT will will increase your libido, even if
Your sex drive was already high to begin with. As I mentioned in my
messages about this, my libido has actually increased, even if it was
already high. For the first months of TRT, I felt like a voracious sex
monster, and my already high level of sexual activity increased
significantly.
However, as always, I built it in my lifestyle and now it is fine. His
become my new normal. (Thank you God, I am not a Beta or Alpha monogamous
1.0
or I would have a serious problem of life on my hands. absolute sexual
Monogamy can * not * work for the man of high sex drive, or woman for that
material.)
But yes, to be clear, with a high libido is indeed a drawback
life because it forces you to take time and additional efforts to manage
this and
integrate this in your life, something most "normal" men
need to do, or at least will not be necessary to do so.
* A healthy sex drive is closely associated with other positive traits *
libido, at least the male type, is not a feature which is isolated from
everything else. Rather, it is almost always linked to other traits
will really help you in life, such as:
1. Higher levels of daily energy
2. A stronger drive to achieve the objectives (in business, fitness, women,
or
whatever)
3. A more optimistic view of the world and / or your own future
4. A more masculine personality and perhaps more confident (making you more
attractive to women, and to a degree, men as well)
This is exactly why I say Alpha Men promising monogamy are lying,
either to the woman or to themselves. Dynamic, motivated, confident,
male, men have generally been training more sex drive. It is
logged. One could almost think male libido not as a single line,
but as a line in a basket of other features that are hard-coded
together.
So if I "took a pill" that blasted my high zero sexual appetite, it would
also probably reduce my level of energy, drive, motivation and the joy of
living,
at least to the point where I and others noticed. Holy hell, that is
the last thing I want! These are the same traits that helped me
achieve my goals, and I'm going to need to hit future targets, which I
have a lot. It is these traits that give me the edge over most other men,
many are smarter and / or more handsome than me, but that normal
or lower sex drives.
It is true that in the future we might be able to manipulate the human brain
or DNA to "surgery" to remove any sex drive without disturbing anything
else in our personalities, but until that day arrives, it is extremely
dangerous to assume that sexual desire can or should be reduced because all
what happens is that you want less sex. No, your male readers will
also suffer. I've seen it with many men as they age, my father
included. Yes, the sex drive decreases, but the fact the general happiness
levels and the joy of living. No thanks.
* So I take this pill fuck? *
You will notice that I have not yet answered the question. It's because
I needed to provide all of the above context for my answer. Now that you
have this context, here is my answer.
Question 1: Do I take a pill that reduces my sexual desire for zero
rest of my life, so I never needed to worry about getting sex?
My answer: No, because I would lose other key aspects of my personality
which are extremely valuable and important to me. Keeping the high sexual
desire,
it causes even "overhead" in my life, is more than worth having
these positive traits.
Question 2: Okay, if the pill has eliminated your libido for the rest
of your life while allowing you to keep all these traits, and ensure
you will suffer * * negative physical or mental side effects?
My response: While I'm very tempted now, my answer is always no. Even if I
were
no sex drive, there would be scenarios I can imagine having in my future
I would want to have a sex drive and enjoy sex, even if a
a little moment.
For example, I really like riding on large super-fast roller coaster. I have
riding a lot and can not wait to get some more. If you waved a magic wand
and completely eliminated the desire of my personality, even if you kept
everything else the same, I'm sure I'd be a little sad, or
less affected, as are the emails I receive men worry that they
no sex drive. I remember the pleasure these coasters were, and I can
consider to want to want to go on again. So my answer is still no,
tempting that I admit is.
Question 3: Okay, okay. Let's say you can take this pill, but at
time, you can take an antidote that would return instantly up your sex
back to you. You can go "on" and "off" the pill whenever you like,
as much as you want, without side effects either, without affecting
any motivation or drive. Now, would you take?
My answer: Yes, now I take it. If I was 100% sure that it worked
how you say it would be in your case, and I have seen many other men
do successfully over several years (I * not * be a
early adopter; not even close), while I'd probably do it. The capacity
* * to temporarily switch off my sex drive would be a useful feature in my
body, provided the rest of my happy personality was motivated
unchanged.
Hopefully now you understand how the issue of male sex drive is not
simple as it seems. For now, I'll stick with it.
But hey, who knows what the future holds?
The message Would you take a magic pill to eliminate your need for sex?
first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
Lion
[Image: Lion]
* The core of the story belongs to Tony Robbins, although I
Pua Mgtowized it. *
* For many of you, this is your story. *
Once upon a time, a young lion lived with his mother and father in pride
in the plains of Africa. One day, a group of fighters attacked the pride.
The cub looked at her father was shot and killed. always a
little bear and did not understand what was happening, he ran this way and
that, trying to understand.
His mother grabbed him and threw him into some nearby bushes to save
him. Then she was shot too.
The cub still did not understand, but he was afraid. He ran and ran. he
survived. He was the only lion in his pride to do so.
Hours later, he was alone in the plains, and a flock of sheep walked by.
One sheep brushed against him, and said, "baaaah".
He cocked his head to one side. Again, sheep says "baaaah. " She
said the head that he must follow. Not knowing what else
to do the cub did.
The cub was raised by his new family, sheep. The sheep were shy
and kind. They were loving and gentle. Often, the lion, fully grown and
a little more, join the sheep grazing peacefully in the plains or
drinking water of the lake. He said: "baaaah" like sheep.
He acted like a sheep and lived like a sheep.
The lion loved the sheep, but deep in his mind, he felt sometimes
something was wrong. He could never quite put my finger on it, so he tried
do not think much.
He was not happy. He was not unhappy. There was always this nagging sense
of wrongness, but it was ... comfortable.
One day, a lion pride attacked the sheep. The lion looked in
the horror that these fearsome beasts tore his friends and tattered feasted
their carcasses.
A big lion went over to the young lion and roared in a happy
greeting. The lion curled away like a sheep, and said, "baaaah".
The lion more slammed the youngest lion face. "Holy is
wrong with you? " he cried. "You're a lion! Not a sheep! "
"Beee," the lion said.
"Jesus" groaned the lion more. With that, he grabbed the lion by younger
the scruff of her hair, and dragged, kicking and struggling, to
Lake. Why was it that lion be so mean? Why he killed the
sheep? This lion was most clearly an asshole in total!
Finally, the lion down further the lion head toward
water, touching almost, but not quite.
"Witness! Check your reflection in the water!" Said the lion more. "You are
a large and powerful LION! You're not a sheep! We exclude this kingdom! You
are one of us. Remember who you are! Be yourself!"
The lion saw his reflection in the water, and was confused. same
after more lion released his grip on her, the lion continued to watch
to himself in the placid lake. Indeed, it was him. Indeed, he had the air
just
Like a lion.
But no. This can not be. I was raised by sheep. I am a sheep, not a lion.
Lions are assholes. Sheep are gentle and kind. I'm not an asshole. I am a
sheep.
No?
The conflict raged in him. He shook his head in pain and said "baaaah. "
The lion was wiser, and could see the inner conflict in the
lion. "Here," said the lion more. "I'll make you remember. "
Again, the lion caught more youngest lion and pulled him
the rest of the pride, who feasted their sheep dinner. Lion
then tore a piece of flesh, one of the carcasses, and stuffed
in the mouth of the lion.
The lion was horrified. He tried to spit, but the lion more
grabbed his nose, forcing him to chew and swallow. " Remember! " He
cried. "Remember you of who you really are!"
The lion struggled, trying to spit, trying to vomit,
trying to break free from the grip of more lion, but years with the sheep
had
making it small compared to the largest lion in front of him. Finally,
lion fell and swallowed the meat, full of disgust.
But a strange thing happened. Disgust suddenly ... gone. the
... meat tasted wonderful. GREAT! The young lion suddenly felt a power
deep within him that he had never felt before. The fire was raised in his
eyes, strength
came to his muscles, and clarity came to his mind.
Seeing the change, the lion looser his grip, nodding slowly. the
lion stood up and roared. It was the first time he had ever roared
in his life, and the sound echoed in the plains and was heard by
all. The other lions in the pride and turned looking at him, roared their
approval, recognizing their equal, a great lion; New member
pride.
A large fog lifted the young lion, and for the first time in his life,
immediately felt. Finally, having lived all his life as a sheep, he
realized what it meant to be who he really was. It was the power. It was
happiness. It was an accomplishment. * What is it was always meant to be. *
He joined the proud, and lived a life as a lion, and a life-size
happiness.
Never will be again a sheep.
Now he roared.
The Message The Lion first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
* The core of the story belongs to Tony Robbins, although I
Pua Mgtowized it. *
* For many of you, this is your story. *
Once upon a time, a young lion lived with his mother and father in pride
in the plains of Africa. One day, a group of fighters attacked the pride.
The cub looked at her father was shot and killed. always a
little bear and did not understand what was happening, he ran this way and
that, trying to understand.
His mother grabbed him and threw him into some nearby bushes to save
him. Then she was shot too.
The cub still did not understand, but he was afraid. He ran and ran. he
survived. He was the only lion in his pride to do so.
Hours later, he was alone in the plains, and a flock of sheep walked by.
One sheep brushed against him, and said, "baaaah".
He cocked his head to one side. Again, sheep says "baaaah. " She
said the head that he must follow. Not knowing what else
to do the cub did.
The cub was raised by his new family, sheep. The sheep were shy
and kind. They were loving and gentle. Often, the lion, fully grown and
a little more, join the sheep grazing peacefully in the plains or
drinking water of the lake. He said: "baaaah" like sheep.
He acted like a sheep and lived like a sheep.
The lion loved the sheep, but deep in his mind, he felt sometimes
something was wrong. He could never quite put my finger on it, so he tried
do not think much.
He was not happy. He was not unhappy. There was always this nagging sense
of wrongness, but it was ... comfortable.
One day, a lion pride attacked the sheep. The lion looked in
the horror that these fearsome beasts tore his friends and tattered feasted
their carcasses.
A big lion went over to the young lion and roared in a happy
greeting. The lion curled away like a sheep, and said, "baaaah".
The lion more slammed the youngest lion face. "Holy is
wrong with you? " he cried. "You're a lion! Not a sheep! "
"Beee," the lion said.
"Jesus" groaned the lion more. With that, he grabbed the lion by younger
the scruff of her hair, and dragged, kicking and struggling, to
Lake. Why was it that lion be so mean? Why he killed the
sheep? This lion was most clearly an asshole in total!
Finally, the lion down further the lion head toward
water, touching almost, but not quite.
"Witness! Check your reflection in the water!" Said the lion more. "You are
a large and powerful LION! You're not a sheep! We exclude this kingdom! You
are one of us. Remember who you are! Be yourself!"
The lion saw his reflection in the water, and was confused. same
after more lion released his grip on her, the lion continued to watch
to himself in the placid lake. Indeed, it was him. Indeed, he had the air
just
Like a lion.
But no. This can not be. I was raised by sheep. I am a sheep, not a lion.
Lions are assholes. Sheep are gentle and kind. I'm not an asshole. I am a
sheep.
No?
The conflict raged in him. He shook his head in pain and said "baaaah. "
The lion was wiser, and could see the inner conflict in the
lion. "Here," said the lion more. "I'll make you remember. "
Again, the lion caught more youngest lion and pulled him
the rest of the pride, who feasted their sheep dinner. Lion
then tore a piece of flesh, one of the carcasses, and stuffed
in the mouth of the lion.
The lion was horrified. He tried to spit, but the lion more
grabbed his nose, forcing him to chew and swallow. " Remember! " He
cried. "Remember you of who you really are!"
The lion struggled, trying to spit, trying to vomit,
trying to break free from the grip of more lion, but years with the sheep
had
making it small compared to the largest lion in front of him. Finally,
lion fell and swallowed the meat, full of disgust.
But a strange thing happened. Disgust suddenly ... gone. the
... meat tasted wonderful. GREAT! The young lion suddenly felt a power
deep within him that he had never felt before. The fire was raised in his
eyes, strength
came to his muscles, and clarity came to his mind.
Seeing the change, the lion looser his grip, nodding slowly. the
lion stood up and roared. It was the first time he had ever roared
in his life, and the sound echoed in the plains and was heard by
all. The other lions in the pride and turned looking at him, roared their
approval, recognizing their equal, a great lion; New member
pride.
A large fog lifted the young lion, and for the first time in his life,
immediately felt. Finally, having lived all his life as a sheep, he
realized what it meant to be who he really was. It was the power. It was
happiness. It was an accomplishment. * What is it was always meant to be. *
He joined the proud, and lived a life as a lion, and a life-size
happiness.
Never will be again a sheep.
Now he roared.
The Message The Lion first appeared on the blog Pua Mgtow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)