Lite alt alt and right agree on several things, namely the need to respect
national sovereignty, strong boundaries and globalism opposed. But the
biggest difference between the two camps is that the lite alt believes it
is still possible to hold the United States together using civic
nationalism. But here's why civic nationalism is doomed to failure.
What civic nationalism?
Civic nationalism is the idea that diverse groups of people can come
together and build a nation without their ethnic allegiances taking
priority over that of the nation. The United States in the 20th century was
a good example of civic nationalism of work. Of Western European groups
mostly their old allegiances put aside and are fully committed to the
American project. Immigrants often do not bother to teach their children
their native language because they wanted their children to become
Americans, not Germans, Italians and French who happen to live in the
United States.
The opposite of civic nationalism is ethnic nationalism. In ethnic
nationalism, people support the nation because it consists mainly of others
who are more or less tied, they look like they speak the same language,
they have the same religion, and they have a common culture. Examples of
ethno-nationalist states are South Korea, Japan, Israel and Poland. This
does not mean that they have no foreigners living within their nation; it
simply means that the overwhelming majority of people are of the same
ethnic group.
It is important to note that in an ethno-nationalist state, foreigners can
be respected and treated well, but they may feel that they can never become
fully Korean or completely Polish. It may take a generation or two before
their descendants finally become part of the ethnos.
Forging a new people
Unit based on a soft drink
Civic nationalism only works if a new people is created. This happened in
the United States in the 20th century. American culture has replaced the
ancient culture of immigrants. There was even a sort of national religion
political philosopher Samuel Huntington defined as Christianity without
Christ. When asked who they were, these Americans did not say: "I am
German-American" or "I'm American English. "The answer was always," I'm an
American, "and it was said with pride.
The only group that has been somewhat excluded were to be entirely black
Americans. There were several reasons for this, including the history of
slavery, cultural differences, and the fact that they were very different
from the white majority.
The fight against poverty
From the 1960s, the United States undertook a Herculean effort to integrate
the black community in the American mainstream. American elites, by
government legislation, affirmative action, welfare, judicial activism,
Hollywood, television and educational institutions in place measures to
eliminate all obstacles to the integration of blacks.
Fifty years later, it is fair to say that the effort to integrate blacks
into the mainstream American failed. It is true that some blacks have
benefited from Byzantine conglomeration of measures implemented by the
elites, blacks "are lagging far behind whites in key areas of economic
well-being as wealth, income and property. "
Of course, this Black integration system is not free. Publisher and science
fiction writer Vox Day has calculated that the average white American will
transfer nearly a million dollars to a black American in a life when you
take into account the interest on the federal debt. If the calculation is
correct, the system, the elites have set up is unfair and unsustainable.
If you are a white American, in your life, you transfer a net average of $
971,000 in a single black person.
- Supreme Dark Lord (@voxday) June 30, 2017
Plan B
If the Americans were aware of the extent of the failure of the fight
against poverty was, they immediately put an end to the system. But the
media and universities deliberately whiten real history to preserve the
system for a while longer. Meanwhile, elites have implemented a plan B to
solve the problem.
Plan B takes a different approach. Rather than trying to integrate blacks
into white society, Plan B aims to end the white society altogether. It
does this in four ways: the third world immigration without control, and
encourage crossbreeding low birth rates, and calling for the need to end
the "whiteness".
Immigration
Before 1965, almost all immigration to the United States of Europe. Now the
vast majority of immigrants come from Central America, Asia and Africa. And
we are at levels of immigration records. Whites increased from 89% of the
population in 1960 to 62% in 2010. This type of population replacement does
not occur normally, except in cases of full-scale military invasion.
miscegenation
State Farm ad
The media encourages intermarriage with TV shows, movies and commercials.
The excuse is that producers are only reflect the diversity of the United
States, but it seems much more widespread in the media than it does in the
real world.
Encourage low birth rates
Another common tactic to White tries to convince women to have fewer
babies. But you will never see an article "have fewer babies" with black
women, Asian or Hispanic and babies. It's always the white women and babies
who are featured. This is an area where the media forgets all about
diversity.
The end of "whiteness"
The latest attack was to question the "whiteness" itself. Whiteness is a
social construction that is inextricably linked, we are told, with racism.
Some went further, even if the issue does subtle calls for violence against
whites. But we never see the articles that encourage blacks to give up
their blackness or for Jews to abandon Jewishness.
How will it end?
Donald Trump endorses the civic nationalism. His campaign promise, and I
think he was sincere when he did was to make America great-raise all
Americans, regardless of their color. If anyone could operate the civic
nationalism, it would be Trump. Unfortunately it does not look like Trump
will get the support of his own party in the realization of his vision.
Establishment GOP politicians are too beholden to wealthy plutocrats to
allow any serious derailment turn plan in the United States in a country
without an identifiable majority.
In truth, however, the same Trump plan to restore civic nationalism does
not go far enough. To do this, it would take more than a few deport illegal
and improving the US economy. It would take a full rollback of all the
affirmative action system, a moratorium on immigration, and a complete
overhaul of existing social programs. No one, not Trump and not the lite
alt, talking about it. Thus, civic nationalism train has left the station.
Instead civic nationalism, the future looks more tribal men align with this
group, they share more with the common. For most Americans, this may mean
embracing some form of white nationalism. There is already a growing number
of an agreement between the right-wing groups in the United States and
Europe. The elites recognize and afraid, and with good reason, there has
never been this level of cooperation between the white nationalist groups
worldwide.
But white nationalism is not the only possibility. There are some religious
groups that have the possibility of forming tribes that do not break
strictly along racial lines. Catholics, Mormons, Orthodox and Muslims all
have solid infrastructure to unite their members in the autonomous
communities once the order starts to retreat.
Finally, there is a possibility that does not concern tribalism-an empire
built on the spiritual unity. The Holy Roman Empire, which lasted a
thousand years included many different people, but who share a common
faith. Given the disappearance of the belief in the US and Europe, that
possibility is a long shot.
Conclusion
Civic nationalism is only possible when there is something that strongly
unites a group of people. American elites, perhaps with good intentions at
the outset, have systematically compromise that bound Americans together.
Now we are left with a lot of groups that will become increasingly
polarized over the next decade. Begin to prepare now for the inevitable.
Read more: Why democracy, nationalism and globalization economy can not
Coexist
No comments:
Post a Comment