Since I started editing Wikipedia in 2004, I have observed transfer
(parallel to that of rationalwiki) collaboration to rapid growth led by
secular humanists slightly left of center, who at least tried to allow
their critics and # 8217; views a semblance of fair coverage in a much more
flagrant and shameless platform dominated by SJW that quiet.
Events such as the decision of disputes naming Manning, and the rise of
radical feminists administrators as Alison (NSFW), not to mention the
decision blatantly unjustified Wikipedia: Miscellany for deletion /
Wikipedia: WikiProject Seduction to friend zone project, without a number
close & # 8221; we pretty much said the writing was on the wall.
Wikipedia has always had its critics and malcontents, many of which were on
the list of banned users. What I see now, however, is that even officials
Wikipedia don t take the project more seriously. The most thoughtful,
reasonable, impartial users were driven out of the project, so there is
little left but a handful of monomanics aspergic hardworking away unnoticed
most of time on obscure subjects, while the leftist ideologues documenting
each new development in the evolution of the rape culture. Meanwhile, the
trolls n t seem to have made a sincere ideological ax to grind are most
actively involved in managing day to day project. Senior Wikipedians even
admit they toy with users for the lulz.
Probably the most honest, simple and concise guide on how Wikipedia
actually works is Wikipedia: WikiSpeak. He notes that on Wikipedia,
conflict of interest refers to editing an article on a subject that you
really understand. Uncommon and punishable, expertise & # 8221.
Adding content Wikipedia has always been a frustrating experience,
disappointing. It has always been a challenge to make the same high-quality
content to stick. And there was always dickheads around which attitudes
were less pleasant experience. Yet in recent years it appears to have
worsened.
The Rise of load Wikipedia Edition
As the number of volunteers to edit Wikipedia is down, there's increased
interest in the paid edition. If you build a reputation for quality work,
you can make hundreds or thousands of dollars per article written on behalf
of businesses, organizations, people, etc. who want you to manage their
management Wikipedia reputation. You just write the article, one of your
many on call for you to post Meat Puppets Wikipedia, and collect your
payment.
In addition, you can have the customer sign up you pay an annual fee to
continue editing the article on their behalf if necessary. The reason why
the salary is so high that only few people are quite familiar with the
labyrinthine complexity of the rules of Wikipedia and culture in order to
successfully navigate the process. It's an alphabet soup of obscure
political Wikipedia, guidelines and tests, each with its own acronym, which
refers to Wikipedians discussions.
In theory, if you're a publisher paid, you're supposed to publicly disclose
your customers, your relationship with them, and the changes you made on
their behalf. But that's a bit like a girl accept the invitation to speak
to him about your emotional vulnerabilities. It's not going to end well.
Just as she'll lose respect, Wikipedia s vigilantes treat you with
disrespect as well.
Many Wikipedia administrators and their friends made a hobby, or at least a
fun hobby, griefing of paid editors that followed assiduously rules by
revealing their conflicts of interest and 8221. Some of # fishing
techniques trolling are straight out of the playbook SJW. For example,
consider the action drama perpetual instigator Jytdog, which I presented as
a case study.
Jytdog v Janweh64 :. Armageddon More of a violation of Imaginary Protocol
As a girlfriend whiny, Wikipedia's style trolls SJW divert attention from
the consolidation of civilization by picking fights over nothing.
publisher paid Janweh64 was reported to administrators Noticeboard /
incidents follow Wikipedia's exhortations to & # 8221 demonstrate boldness;
and ignore all the rules and # 8221; by moving the Mainspace an article
that everyone agrees about doesn t contain anything objectionable. beef
people have with it is that the background process, which probably Janweh64
in law for allegedly Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy & # 8220;.
How wiki is that if you have a problem with someone's actions, you simply
return them with a summary of why change, and it can open a discussion if
it wants to restore the changes he made. This proven and true method of
interaction wiki, called the Bold, back, discuss the cycle, allows a
problem to solve quickly and with minimal drama. He was allowing individual
users in this way that Wikipedia could jump to Encyclopedia Britannica to
become the most comprehensive encyclopedia in the world.
But SJWs, and those who take inspiration from their technical, can never
let an error (or a perceived error) go so easily. They're like women who
described Sean Connery & # 8217 can t leave him alone. They want to have
the last word. Then you give them the last word, but are not happy with the
final word. They mean again and get into a really challenging circumstances
& # 8221. Now that the point and scream stage of SJW style attack is
finished, Jytdog seeking an apology:
This way of acting aggressively to support your paid edition and then
arguing fiercely to defend your aggressiveness will simply lead to an
indefinite block NOTHERE. None of the volunteers here want to waste time
any time at all to deal with what is right for you to make money. Don t you
that? What people have little patience, exhaust yourself by doing this.
There are some paid editors that describe what they do, and get & # 8221;
and do not create drama and they add value to WP. You could have been one
of them, maybe. Not what you choose & # 8230; so be it. . . . .
The output of this particular hole is fair to say Hey, I get it. I am
sorry. I will not move my own items paid over to the main space, but calls
in the normal way if I feel a AfC review was unfair. Again, my apologies
for creating drama. It is important to me that I stay right with everyone.
Something like that. but to say and do, and don t do things that causes
people to hang out here.
In response, Janweh64 actually examines and gives excuses:
In light of the new changes / clarifications by Jydog here March 13 to WP:
conflicts of interest, I will not move my own articles paid to the main
space more, but calls in the normal way if I feel a review AfC was unfair.
I apologize for creating drama again. It is important to me that I stay
right with everyone. I was really not aware and not aware of the amendments
to this directive specifically made only after only 20 days of my previous
ANI, which was not closed archived.
Janweh64 makes the exact statement Jytdog merely suggesting it does, almost
verbatim, stressing in his own defense that Jytdog recently made a change
to the rules without warning him. Jytdog continued the attack, using SJW
Reject and transform strategy that is quickly dismissed the apology because
it is not the action but the actor, who is the real target:
Janweh answer promises that this problem will end, which is good, but the
rest of what you write argumentative and there & # 8230; horrible. The NNA
wire before two months ago also called publisher Paid movement Mainspace
own projects and in this thread several publishers have told you the same
thing you said here.
In other words, every single editor who commented here and waste their
time. This is what you come communiquiez. You will be dealing WP guidelines
and policies as & # 8221 rulebooks; you will operate as hard as you can to
earn money here, and you ignore comments from the community.
It's nothing like what I have advised you to write. You can leave your
comments stand or hit, but you should be aware of how bad for you, your
position was.
The situation Corrects Endercase
Finally, Endercase, a user who is currently under repair & # 8221
mentoring; (Aka wiki-tested) and will probably end up being banned at one
time to fraternize with Unpersons and be too much of a dissident-franc
wiki, chimes and flips the script:
@Jytdog: This user is nothing like you seem to represent in your statement
above. You can leave your comments stand or hit, but you should be aware of
how bad for you, your job was & # 8221. They stated that they are and
conflicts of interest following the policy / consensus better
understanding. You have won here, I do not understand the apparent
hostility or your apparent failure of AGF. IMO this would have never been
brought to AN / I (where it wastes our time) clearly (IMO) just had a
discussion on the user talk page was enough & # 8230; I agree with your
sentiment, not just the methods that have been used and are proposed for
use here.
After being called, Jytdog decides to retreat rather than risk too far and
exposure to counter. But of course, it doesn t apologize for his own
personal attacks (since it would simply draw attention to the fact that it
probably violated the rules of civility), and he gets in some final
recoveries before leaving accordance with the principle that SJW They
always double down against their lies & # 8221;:
& # 8230; this issue to move their own items paid Mainspace was raised
again. Trial was semi-understandable. Whether it is second over all is
difficult to understand, like slipping back into fierce arguments to
justify marginal behavior. Whether it completed the second wire with them
make an argument wikilawyering half justifying this happened again, is bad
for them. It is on the way when they lose.
I agree that this thread should be closed. I still hope that Janweh has the
good sense to strike a more clueful statement before it happens, but if
they choose to let him rest, either.
Janweh64 therefore again to cause and blamed # 8220; drama, and is extended
one last invitation to engage in self-abasement more ritual that can then
be used against him in the vein of, Janweh64 even admitted the last time he
was wrong, but instead of changing its behavior after being warned twice,
now it has become necessary to open a third wire. When will we finally say
this is enough & # 8221 ?;
Wiki-Paid Vigilantes Encourage publishers to turn to the dark side
Rent a Meat Puppets, and do editing Wikipedia undisclosed paid, and your
journey towards the dark side will be complete.
What can possibly happen is that Janweh64 will become fed up and paid an
undisclosed editor (as it should have done from the beginning). His growing
awareness of the inequality is evident in his comment, you punish me to
declare my religiously 1000s when conflicts of interests of others are
changing without declaration & # 8221. It's beginning to unplug and take
the pill wiki- red, as he sees how it is against-productive to be the nice
guy who follows the rules. How long before he tires of seeing the bad guys
get all wiki-wiki pussy while masturbating?
Jytdog was called for before, it is interesting to try to have the
discussion at Talk: Jews and a cursory review of records revealed that the
same group of defenders manifests whenever he accused of anything. This is
part of a larger pattern in which users who are members of the same clique
that administrators are forgiven for their innocent mistakes, while others
prohibited, however they apologize for their miserably trivial
transgressions ( or imaginary).
As prosecutors, administrators interpret the rules generally prohibit their
opponents behavior and interpret the rules contain exceptions closely the
accused could cite in their defense. They require the strict application of
rules by doing favors their side; but call for flexibility to deviate from
the rules when it suited their purpose instead. Meanwhile, according to the
tactical SJW users Isolate and Swarm & # 8221; as Endercase who practice
usually report that the emperor is not wearing clothes marked for disposal.
There was a time that despite Wikipedia defects, it was still a place where
you might have some useful achievements as a content creator. But now, as
spergs quietly continue to build about 90 percent of Wikipedia's useful
content outside areas such as biology, science, medicine, the War of 1812,
etc. Wikipedia has mostly degenerated into an area games for infiltration
SJW trolls. Meanwhile, donations continue to roll in well-meaning chumps.
However, Wikipedia has a lot of useful infrastructure, built by many unsung
heroes of the MediaWiki development community. So I would say, the best
strategy is that (1) if you want to make money as a paid editor, go ahead
and take advantage of this decline and # 8221; situation through
undisclosed editing conflicts of interest; and (2) if you like creating
content and have nothing better to do, go ahead and add articles to
Wikipedia, but save copies of your content to repost to Infogalactic Kings
Wiki, or another niche wiki would be appropriate, in case of deletion. And
of course, (3) Munch popcorn and watching lulzfest is Wikipedia's
Kafkaesque dystopia online, if you're sick enough to be in that kind of
thing.
Read more: Kings Wiki Introducing a Wikipedia for us
No comments:
Post a Comment