I am so proud to be part of a film that celebrates diversity, literacy,
inclusion, joy and love the way it did.
& # 8212; Emma Watson praising the movie
Seeking to take advantage of the professional uncertainty of the post-Harry
Potter lives, the British actress Emma Watson and SJW praised a brand new
gender neutral MTV acting award for awful live-action remake Beauty and the
Beast. Of course, Watson welcomed the price after having won and received
pats on the back from seemingly every other celebrities present. No one
should be shocked that the first person to win this title is an infamous
gender activist and, rather than just being a professional artist who does
his job and leaves political commentary to others.
To the joy of returning kings, Beauty and the Beast is a pastiche of
patriarchy that feminists hate with a pet random sandwiching SJW causes
such as homosexuality (as a plot gay scene irrelevant ). We can not find
Watson attractive, but its beautiful nature is clearly popular for its
perceived beauty and falls in love with the docile man, beast, who
imprisoned her. Even with the awkward angle left inserted in the film, it
is as an example a little classic Stockholm syndrome. Like it or not, any
reason Lady and in the end Beast relationship is because of a series of
acts which SJWs describe as misogynist code. The rape culture
The MTV Movie Awards have commendable reputation blockbusters granting
trash and slavish attention given to Emma Watson simply continues this
trend. What is more disturbing, however, is the very self buzz Watson the
price generated. SJWs do not ask, for example, that companies remove binary
gender quotas, such as Norway's requirement that 40% of boardroom posts are
filled by women, without any measures to & # 8221 Androgynous; or bigender
representation. Or that the Olympics should become either a neutral kind of
competition or extend 60 different sexual and gender categories to allow
gender-spirit and pansexual athletes to win gold medals, too.
The logic of SJW gender identity policy was pathetic to start. It is now
unraveling further. Also, once again pontificating celebrities and their
media sycophants isolated them from the general population. Even many
readers & # 8221 new; sites such as The Guardian are criticizing the human
rights pseudo-activism of these professional victims multimillionaire.
At first glance, this gender neutral share price might seem to be another
nail in the coffin of common sense. Yet, for one, welcome as a case of
significant overextension. So if you. Caught up in their own ideology, SJWs
celebrity gradually (pardon the pun) undermine the notion of feminism
itself.
By insisting that the male-female divide is interspersed with a billion
other gender identities, they make huge holes in their own previous
arguments that women deserve special privileges, such as separate
competitions, which are being currently denied to those who claim to be
other genres. Therefore, many feminist programs have spent years shouting
can now be described as discriminatory and harmful use SJWs own belief
systems.
acting awards gender neutral, so why not the neutral sports gender?
ISN t this just a spin-off of lesbians?
The woman who introduced Emma Watson with its coveted MTV neuter Price
claims she is gender neutral (or she simply has a mental illness). Her name
is Asia and Kate Dillon is best known for his roles in Billions and Orange
is the new black. Earlier, she had written a letter to the Academy
righteous television, insisting that his best actor best actress binary
discrimination of people like her. Here is the best part of his rant:
The reason that I'm hoping you engage in a conversation about this is
because if the categories "actor" and "actress" are actually meant to
represent "the best performance by a person who identifies as a woman"
and "Best performance by a person who identifies as a man, "then there is
no place for my identity in this bit allocation system. Also, if the
categories of "actor" and "actress" are intended to designate the Assigned
I ask sex, with respect, why is it necessary?
The funny thing is, there is no room for Dillon's identity in professional
sports or even most of the fans, either. So where is Emma Watson's outrage?
Dillon, after all, wouldn t feel at home in men's or women's athletics,
basketball or tennis, so surely this binary system must be dismantled as
well. Considering that New York City Commission on organizations of human
rights and other charlatans currently recognize dozens of different sexes,
the only wise choice for SJWs is to make all competitive environments,
whether in action , sports, or another arena, & # 8220;. gender neutral
American colleges rightly perceived as some of the more radical feminist
institutions and anti-men in the world, are also down, paradoxically, of
SJW claims against the recognition of non-binary gender. Changes to the
1972 Education Act created the system infamous Title IX, which prohibits
federally funded universities to engage in the curriculum discrimination,
including for sports, on the basis of gender. Because feminists have used
Title IX to insist on financing and equal attention to women's sports, as
opposed to & # 8221 equality; for all genres that exist SJWS say they
participate in exactly the kind of discrimination that celebrities like
Kate Dillon Asia have railed against in the world of entertainment prices.
You can t do that.
Another reason not to take seriously the celebrities
The man-beast kidnaps woman who wears dresses, woman falls in love with
him, the actress portraying woman wins neuter Acting Award.
Let's remember that for all its supposed activism on behalf of the victims,
if bogus refugees or very rich, non-binary fellow artists, Emma Watson is a
multimillionaire out of touch with the daily needs of those who watch his
films. While his employer Disney has benefited from this era of
globalization, millions of Watson's native Britain are struggling under the
burden of a new form of middle class relative poverty. The kinds of false
causes it advocates for are exactly those people without material concerns
can engage in.
And, I repeat, Watson refuses to take his crusade to its logical extent.
She won t argue for gender neutral sport because erase women & # 8211; and
other non-male gender categories & # 8211; the sporting map. She won t
boardroom quotas approve transgender because feminism s & # 8211 biggest
beneficiaries, wealthy bourgeoisie and daughters of the upper class and #
8211; will lose any changes.
Instead, Watson will be limited to the activism that suits him well & #
8211; while increasing his own profile.
More: Emma Watson Boobs show how modern feminism is lost
No comments:
Post a Comment