One can safely say that the property is learning and adapting their
prodigious losses in 2016, they're adapting their messaging and persuasion
attempts accordingly. The first A / B testing as panic over false news
flopped, but they rebounded quickly recover. The recent election in France,
which saw a very competent technocratic banker astroturfed as a foreign
agent of change, is the largest signal their field tests were successful.
What kind of persuasion tactics are now used?
Shots language Kill
These are probably still in beta testing, but they were used to good effect
in the French countryside. Note that whenever Marine Le Pen was mentioned,
it was preceded by the term right & # 8221. Meanwhile, Emmanuel Macron name
was accompanied by the centrist & # 8221; Mark. Even in America, even on
Fox News, these tags accompany their names without fail every time I've
heard in the media.
These labels, Scott Adams called linguistic destruction of shots can be
used for various purposes, but the whole thing is that they channel the
attention to a certain attribute. It is a form of pre-Persuasion, which
draw attention to the favorable concepts creates special moments & # 8221;
that increase the responsiveness to your key message. In this case, always
calling Le Pen's extreme right & # 8221; Macron and centrist & # 8221;
planted the seeds to make it easier to dismiss the former as dangerous,
while increasing the credibility of the latter. The facts on the economic
level, the program Pen is far enough to the left, while Macron reported
significant belligerence for European countries do not tow the EU line,
were negligible.
These shots kill linguistic weren t as advanced as the Donald Trump used
his own campaign, which involved more sensual cues that were also more open
to confirmation bias, but it should be noted that the establishment seems
to test these out .
Censorship and Selective statement
When the media tried to accuse his opponents of spreading false news, the
label turned against quickly because they have engaged in selective
reporting or outright hoaxes too often, a trend that certainly hasn t
fallen since Trump s inauguration. Although this effort turns against them
on the hot battlefield of persuasive language, victory was in part because
it was the springboard from which they got their excuse to start to censor
social media, which was decisive bypassing the false news media to create
favorable news cycles of our undercutting while the story of the
establishment.
More and more, the false news was an excuse used by the major social
networks to censor or demote information they do not like. Billing itself,
supposedly independent verification of facts sights are now used in
Facebook's algorithm. Google made some noise to change its own algorithm to
filter what he calls. Fake news Twitter, meanwhile, a (supposedly)
strangled tweets that they do not like. Responses to Donald Trump filtered
so that only the negative effects first appear. Trending Tags are almost
always hysteria shores s creation story.
Who determines & # 8221 false ?; Who decides what you should learn to see?
Some inexplicable technocrat? You see where it goes. It's a dangerous road
that perfectly matches the next aspect of this, the very selective
reporting.
In France, a few days before the election, emails from Macron campaign was
disclosed. They were quickly authenticated, or most of them, anyway.
WikiLeaks didn t find any false (last I checked). fake news did everything
he could to hide the contents of the emails. The law in France prohibiting
any kind of information campaign in the 48 hours before an election
complicated things, but you had American pundits and presstitutes openly
call for the concealment of this information worthy of public interest
because it would have a negative effect on their team.
Predictably, it was given the fig leaf of Russia because Muh excuse, with
little or no evidence. Let's also be honest & # 8211; if Le Pen was looking
strong and harmful emails were leaked, would the country be respected law
so strongly by the media in France? Somehow, I doubt.
The Free & # 8221; the press is the fruit of the imagination of & # 8221
journalists; that guards as sacrosanct consider the public good, but in
truth, they will do what their masters tell them. Their job is to spread
the story, not report the truth. Therefore, we see more media simply refuse
to report on anything that undermines the narrative of the establishment,
all the time, social media will be censored, as we have seen a major
crackdown on the accounts Facebook and Twitter, blackening many who shared
the contents of Macron emails. Jack Posobiec was distinguished especially
in a successful job stream because it was one of the first personalities to
share.
How to adapt to this? Roosh posited there a moment as Facebook and Twitter
have passed their peak of importance to the war of information and new
media would arise in the years before the next US election. The creation
and strengthening of new platforms such as Gab and spirit seems to be the
first answer. Monetization against figures of culture and journalists can
become increasingly difficult, as the YouTube Apocalypse is on track,
return of kings was closed PayPal, and even Dave Rubin, a relatively
uncontroversial figure that is yet a skeptical air current cultural time,
had problems with his Amazon affiliate account. This will be an ongoing
battle that requires constant innovation and adaptation.
Candidates Astroturfed
During the Brexit campaign, the pro-EU side Remain ran on what they called.
Fear Project & # 8221; The key message is that leaving the EU would be a
disaster and really, really scary. The same was largely true of the
campaign Hillary Clinton, who ran more on fear of Trump on the services it
provides. The two lost campaigns. This is partly because they weren t
manage their messaging based on fear as well as they could have, but partly
also was because people want to vote for something, rather than vote
against something .
Leave and Trump campaigns offered posts with ambitious obvious benefits,
while all the way to election day, I could not understand why the Democrats
t I wanted to vote for Hillary Clinton rather than against Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, the campaign offered leave Brits. Regain control of their country
In France, the story was different. Emmanuel Macron was high and famous.
Pre-Persuasion reminder that high in s attention is what we think is most
important right now. While Le Pen was dismissed as extreme right and
Francois Fillon, who would probably have won normally, was destroyed by a
huge attention to allegations of financial transactions (blotter when
attention was paid to him at all), the media gushed about how Macron was
great.
It was presented as a change agent, a foreigner who would shake things up,
in complete contrast to its history & # 8230; and it worked.
Macron youth was also an advantage for him. One of the French used the
forum theorizes that there will soon have a tendency to run figures
Macron-like & # 8212; young, good-looking men, especially white women SHORE
through voting age. Recall that the main predictor of whether someone votes
for Donald Trump last November was whether he or she married (as a general
for the candidates of the right). It is possible that the facility could
start running younger men, more attractive to take off the vote for married
women.
It is well known that the more attractive candidates get more votes than
the less attractive, which until now has mostly benefited the candidates
right than the left, as it is also known that the Conservatives are
generally more attractive than the Liberals. Will there be a kind of
grooming program and raise young, candidates an unattractive by the
establishment in the future?
It is too early to say for sure, and for now, the Democratic Party in
America is also heavily engaged in identity politics than ever, so I don t
see any of these types of Macron-like candidates for President of the Party
Democratic near future. A race is interesting to note that the runoff for
the seat previously held in Georgia by HHS Secretary Tom Price. There you
have a candidate who has been heavily invested in by the party
establishment, Jon Ossof, who at 30, seems to fit the bill. He came within
a hair's breadth of winning the seat outright. A special election will be
held soon.
We'll see where everything is, but I agree with the guys on the forum. We
probably won t meet the most Hillarys in the future. Instead, we'll be
seeing astroturfed candidates to try to capture the populist energy but
which are sheep's clothing wolf.
Out-grouping and Conclusion
The establishment knows he needs to innovate its tactics. The old paradigm
is crumbling. As I warned in December, hysteria is Russia and has been
designed with everything turned very ordinary success in a constitutional
crisis. False news media working on overdrive to not pay attention to
anything else. It's also given the establishment a pretext to easily censor
bad news for them, as seen in France.
Since call people racist & # 8221; doesn t work as well as in the past,
they're to move on, ironically play on the man's tribal nature (Cialdini
called the principle of unity in the pre-Persuasion) and accusing their
opponents of promoting a enemy out group. In fact, Roosh warned there is
some time that the globalist establishment would use the nationalist
patriotism to promote their own cause, and therefore not taken too far.
Beware, they say, the Russians are coming!
I'm not sure how long this tactic will work, but it is new and has been
effective, a sure sign of adaptation. Don assume the 2016 rules are the
rules in the future. The last war was the last war.
Keep your eyes open in years and the upcoming elections. The chess game
never ends.
Read more: "Imagine" by John Lennon You Programmed To accept globalism
Nightmare
No comments:
Post a Comment