In a historical archive documenting efforts and communist subversion, I
found an interesting article by Leon Trotsky called If America should go
Communist & # 8220;. This was written in 1934, while living in Mexico,
having made himself persona non grata everywhere else in the world because
of his incessant meddling. At the time, the United States crossed the Great
Depression. As the preface explains (though in the nicest words), he
thought it would be a great opportunity to peddle its brand of communism in
a desperate public here. Let see what Comrade Trotsky promised, and if
today leftists have learned nothing.
We blundered while in Russia, but give us another chance in the US
peace and freedom in Sovdepya Trotsky naked butt on a pile of skulls
America should go Communist due to the difficulties and problems that your
capitalist social order is unable to solve, it will discover that
communism, far from being an intolerable bureaucratic tyranny and
individual regimentation, will be the way to greater freedom individual and
shared abundance.
Sure thing! It then lists several reasons why Americans are skeptical of
communism, given his record so far. In fact, it is a pretty damning bill
details, although the USSR worst days were still far from over.
A minute here. Trotsky was a communist since 1896, when it was still called
himself Lev Davidovich Bronstein. It has a lot of influence in the party
establishment even before the Revolution, and became Lenin's second. Later,
he was sidelined, and eventually got kicked out of the country, but before
he had many opportunities to move the Soviet Union in a positive direction.
Does he claim any responsibility? What things did he repair all still in
power? For that matter, how often leftists have their errors?
He explained that this will be very different here because of historical
factors:
Actually American soviets will be as different from the Russian soviets as
the United States of President Roosevelt differs from the Russian Empire of
Czar Nicolas II. Yet communism can come in America only through revolution,
just as independence and democracy came to America.
Then he explains that the revolution is a great American tradition. Should
we break fifes, drums, and Roman candles now, Comrade Trotsky? He goes on
to say that everyone below the top 5-10% of the public is already
economically prepared for communism & # 8221. So how is that translating
popular support? In the election of 1932, the communist candidate received
0.26% of votes cast; in 1936, 0.17%; the revolution is coming! This
stunning miscalculation was even more ridiculous than last year estimates
that Donald Trump had a 1% chance of winning the presidency.
Promises, promises
freedom Bolshevik & # 8211; Trotsky wasn t too popular in Poland is
Trotsky painted a wonderful picture of how much better the manufacturing
sector will be. Thereafter, production costs will be reduced to 20 percent
or less of their current figure & # 8221. Uh, how exactly? Which industries
have 80% of unnecessary overhead? That's still better than we say Obamacare
will give free care to millions without raising prices for people who pay
for their doctors. So this zinger:
Certainly the American soviets would establish their own gigantic farm
enterprises, such as voluntary collectivisation schools. Your farmers could
easily calculate whether their individual advantage to remain isolated as
links or to join the public channel.
So how is this voluntary collectivisation work for Ukrainians at the time?
In addition, it explains how small businesses will Sovietised:
Without restraint! The American soviets would not need to resort to drastic
measures that circumstances have often imposed on the Russians. In the
United States, through the science of publicity and advertising, you have
the means to win the support of your middle class that were out of reach of
Soviet Russia back with the vast majority of illiterate and impoverished
peasants .
We get about propaganda. At least he's starting to get closer to the truth,
finally.
Even the intensity and devotion of religious sentiment in America will not
constitute an obstacle to the revolution. Taking the perspective of soviets
in America, none of the psychological brakes will prove firm enough to
retard the pressure of the social crisis.
Where do I even begin?
Japan will probably have joined the communistic even before the
establishment of American soviets. The same is true of Britain.
What great prophet was Comrade Trotsky. It's really established credibility
here.
Does any of this sound familiar?
The residence of Diego Rivera and his wife Frieda Kahlo. Trotsky couch
surfed here for a few years and boinked his friend's wife.
The governments of Central and South America would be pulled into your
federation like iron filings to a magnet. So what Canada. Popular movements
in these countries are so strong that they would force this great unifying
process in a short time and at negligible cost. I'm willing to bet that the
first anniversary of the American soviets would find the Western Hemisphere
transformed the Soviet United States of North, Central and South America,
with its capital in Panama.
So, this would be with the authorization of people in the countries
concerned, right?
Later, he said prosperity would be assured because the United States has a
lot of developed industry, unlike the USSR, which had to build things from
the ground. Just one problem & # 8212; the United States has, in fact, be
built from the ground; so why mess with something that works? Capitalism
isn t perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than communism. And
apparently unaware that Trotsky Latin America wasn t nearly as
industrialized, it would have known it to set foot outside the upscale
neighborhood where he was staying in Mexico.
According to Trotsky, communism didn t work in the USSR because of the
paper currency. Thus, the US should first implement communism with the gold
standard, the money later will become ordinary paper slips, like trolley or
theater tickets (Um, like paper money?) And eventually the money disappears
because everyone gets everything they want for free. Pull my other leg; it
plays Jingle Bells. Then this:
You can thus avoid growth of bureaucratism by the practice of soviets, that
is to say, democracy - the most flexible form of government yet developed.
Soviet organization can not do miracles but must simply reflect the will of
the people.
Here & # 8221 by the Soviets; it means that the multi-level advisory system
that was supposed to hold power in the USSR, but it was actually a
dictatorship. Trotsky requests are a tad hard to swallow; if the United
States would remain democratic, why the revolution would be necessary in
the first place? If that's what people wanted, they could simply be a
constitutional convention.
Soviet America will have to find a new solution to the question of how the
press has the power to operate in a socialist system. It could be done on
the basis of proportional representation of votes in each soviet election.
Thus the right of each group of citizens to use the power of the press
depend on their numerical strength - the same principle applied to the use
of meeting rooms, allocation of time on the air and so on.
And I have a bridge to sell in Brooklyn.
While romantic numskulls Nazi Germany are dreaming of restoring the old
race of Europe Dark Forest to its original purity, or rather its original
filth, you Americans, after taking a firm grip on your economic machinery
and your culture , apply genuine scientific methods to the problem of
eugenics. Within a century of your melting pot of races, there will come a
new breed of men - the first worthy of the man's name.
Some articles here. First, all political considerations aside, the ancient
Germans were actually quite respectable, as Tacitus noted. Second, his plan
to destroy the genetic uniqueness would've tarred and feathered Gotten it
to come to the United States to preach again in 1934. They had the courage
to fight, before decades of propaganda convince the public that their
heritage isn t preserve. Even now, most people aren t excited for us & #
8220 crossing Soviet New Man & # 8221; but not for lack of trying by
fruitcake leftist social engineers. Third, mention eugenics now leftists
cry like little girls on a roller coaster. That right, Comrade Trotsky
advocated eugenics, how about that!
In summary
Oh, does that hurt icepick?
Some leftists remember Trotsky with emotion, thinking that Communism worked
if only there to support. As we have seen here, it's all the same shit.
Much more likely, a Soviet America would turn the same as all other
countries, the communists wrecked.
Apart from this, Trotsky was manifestly incompetent; not exactly the
brightest bulb in the chandelier. It was quite evident with his last act.
He survived two attempts to whack, knowing his enemies out to get him.
Fortunately, it wasn t smart enough to find another place to hide, so they
finally completed work on this lying weasel.
Read more: Why communism doesn t work
No comments:
Post a Comment