What is fascism?

The word Fascism came out of nowhere to describe Donald Trump, as shown by
the search engine rate that is ten times higher than it was in 2014. After
studying what fascism really means, I concluded that it is used as a weapon
to close the dissenting thought after the previous attack tags like & #
8221 macho; and & # 8221 racist; lost their power.
The problem with the word fascism is that he never had a clear definition.
Every single resource I found that tried to define fascism used a different
set of standards and rules, meaning that no objective definition exists. It
describes nothing and everything at the same time, which means it has no
function in the speech, but of a rhetorical weapon, simply because of World
War 2 Axis power connotation associated with it.
Let's start with the simplest definition, offered by the historian R.J.B.
Bosworth.
... it could be argued that the search for the definition of fascism became
absurdly pained. Why opt for a long list of factors or paragraph ornateness
Rococo when Mussolini repeatedly informed people he considered converted to
his cause that fascism was a simple question? All that was needed was a
single party, a Dopolavoro [ "after work" social recreational
organization], and he did not have to add, a Duce (with Bocchini to
suppress dissent) and a will to exclude the enemy (somehow defined). To be
more succinct, like Mussolini Franco said in October 1936 that the Spaniard
should focus on a diet that was at the same time
was "authoritarian", "social" and "popular." This amalgam, the Duce
advised, was the basis of universal fascism ".
Donald Trump does not advocate for one party does not have a social
recreation organization, and first tried to reach across the aisle to
include the enemy (Democratic Party) to advance his agenda pro-America.
From the mouth of Mussolini himself, the progenitor of fascism, we can
easily conclude that Trump is not.

This seems like an open and shut case, but instead of taking Mussolini s
word, historians insist on analyzing constantly the qualities and nature of
his regime to produce an expanded definition of fascism. This is where we
are in trouble, because their analysis becomes more subjective and mired in
problems of definition.
The three authors agree that statism, nationalism, unity, authoritarianism
and force are essential elements of fascism.
Immediately, you can be hit by terms such as & # 8221 unit and force;
descriptors are waves, especially the latter, which can be used only to
describe an alpha male. I've also seen the word being used to describe
vitality fascism, as if the opposite is more preferable. These authors also
have different definitions of statism, nationalism and authoritarianism,
and these definitions change over time, become vague that they can be used
as a means of attack on almost everyone. & # 8221 fascism; is a system that
is set to other systems, which have all definitions that can be changed at
a moment notice any competent fascist propaganda machine to do what
previously was not fascist.
For the sake of historical accuracy, it should be noted that Jews were
disproportionately represented in Italy's fascist regime, as they were in
communism and cultural Marxism.
[The authors] also noted that the role of anti-Semitism in the rise of
fascist movements was minor. In the case of Italy, it played no role at all
in the early days. For Jews, were much more likely to be members of the
party: it is estimated that in the early 30s, 25% of adult Jews were
members of the fascist party, against about 10% for the whole of the adult
population .
George Orwell, author of Animal Farm and 1984, wrote an essay that points
fascism bendability.
Catholics: Outside its own ranks, the Catholic Church is almost universally
regarded as pro-Fascist, both objectively and subjectively.
War Resisters: Pacifists and others who are anti-war are often accused not
only make things easier for the Axis, but of becoming tinged with
pro-Fascist feeling.
Nationalists: Nationalism is universally regarded as inherently Fascist,
but this occurs only apply to these national movements as the speaker
disapprove. Arab nationalism, Polish nationalism, Finnish nationalism, the
Indian Congress Party, the Muslim League, Zionism and I.R.A. are all
described as Fascist, but not by the same people.
Even in 1944, after Mussolini's fees, the term was already being abused.
We will see that, as used, the word 'Fascism' is almost entirely
meaningless. In the conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly
than in print. I heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit,
corporal punishment, fox hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the
1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality,
Priestley's broadcasts , Hostels, astrology, women, dogs, and I do not know
what else.
He concludes his piece by saying that & # 8221 fascist; is simply an insult
to say & # 8221 despot.
& # 8230; even people who carelessly throw the word in all "fascist"
directions are fixed anyway emotional significance to it. By "Fascism" they
mean, roughly speaking, something cruel, unscrupulous, arrogant,
obscurantist, anti-liberal and anti-working class. Except for the
relatively small number of Fascist sympathizers, almost any English person
would accept 'gross' as a synonym for "fascist". This is about as close to
a definition of the word as sexual abuse came.
Even the word & # 8221 despot; had its definition change over the years,
and has now come to mean someone who is strong, capable and powerful. In
other words, an alpha male. In a society that really believes masculinity
is toxic and everyone who pursues sex with women as likely & # rapist,
8221; we experienced a decade of relentless propaganda attacking everything
a man, which means even a man self assertion average BECOMES & # 8221
despot. Ten years later, a man who is not a cuckold will also be called a
tyrant. real despots who prey on the weak exist, and should be discouraged,
but ordinary establishment used the bully word for anyone and anything with
an essential masculine quality.
From the above analysis, we can now create a definition of fascism to a
modern use any person to the right of me who has the strength. If your
political views are to the right of someone, and you believe that the
strength in leadership is necessary, and the year is in progress, you will
be called a fascist. If you are a conservative & # 8221; who is afraid of
the force because it is literally Hitler, you will not be called a fascist.
If you are on the far left but to use force to assert your position, like
black militant groups Lives matter, you will not be called a fascist. If
you are a homosexual Jew moderate as Milo, who left views but is still
right where most leftist resident, you will be called a fascist, and your
followers will be beaten with pipes. The term is relative and emotional & #
8212; there is a feeling that someone who is more conservative than you
believe in force to help uphold social stability and cultural values.

Since the definition of fascism nebulous manual uses various other systems
to define, especially for the use of labeling by historians to write books
that justify their positions and salaries, anyone who truly feared fascism
should rather impose specific charges of wrongdoing if they intend to carry
on an intellectual debate. For example, what special Trump s nationalism is
wrong logically? What specific authoritarian act that does not follow due
process he encouraged?
I do not think the fascists labeling to drill down to this level of logic,
we have to endure their endless use of the term, mostly because their
sexist previous labels, racist and rapist lost steam and are no longer
effective in the low stop conversations and ideas they consider harmful to
their globalist platform. Here is the era of fascist bot, merely pushing a
term of emotion to a need to assert power, and nothing more.
This article was originally published on Roosh V.
Learn more: What are the ways to win Donald Trump for men