Feminism is still there because men allow to last

In our time, there is a very important truth Red pill that most people
accept unconsciously, but is unmentionable in polite society: that women,
in the end, are entirely dependent on men. Indeed, it is perhaps the
greatest irony of the whole feminist movement that this movement is a
company that is basically to thank you very patriarchal he despises, and he
always will be. Thus, all women in Western society demanding equality,
protesting against sexism and screaming on the patriarchal system, are able
to do so because they are tacitly allowed to engage in such behavior by the
same men they rail against.
Shouting against the very patriarchal it is, in fact, depends ultimately.
First, note the obvious fact that men are naturally stronger, more
aggressive and more capable of serious violence than women. And lest you
disagree, note that prisons are filled with a hell-of-a-many more men than
women; Also note that an average male UFC fighter, for example, could
easily beat even the best female fighter in a one-on-one contest. So the
fact that men, on average, are physically stronger and more competent in
the field of violence and war are not really involved. And this is the
first point to note.
On the other hand, the philosophical perspective, note that while we talk
quaintly in the West the idea of ​​human rights, the fact is that if "the
force is not right", could, in fact, the rules. Indeed, the human "rights"
are valid only because men with guns are ready to enforce these rights. But
without these men, it does not take more than a moment that these rights be
suppressed by one who had the power to do so.
In fact, just look at a few holes of hell third world to see who makes the
rules here: the warlords and other armed men who easily kill those who do
not follow their rules, human rights be damned. Thus, the fact is that in
reality might actually effect the rules, whether we like it or not.
human rights or not, in their corner of the world, these are the guys who
make the rules.
Thus, with the two points mentioned above in mind, now note the obvious
conclusion that these points lead to: since men on average, more physical
power and the power that women and that force makes the rules, men could,
if desired, easily take the reins of power and thus make the rules of
Western society again. Indeed, given that Western men have used their power
in society to give women some believe to women's suffrage, for example,
then there is nothing that theoretically prevents men from using force to
take that power back on a whim.
What this means is that the freedoms, rights and "equality" that Western
women enjoy today exist only because western men have allowed Western women
to have these things. Thus, without either the approval of men, women tacit
or overt, in practice, have any of the rights and freedoms they currently
enjoy.
Moreover, even in modern society today, where the disparity in physical
gender power has declined somewhat due to the advent of technological
equalizers, women are still dependent on men in an ultimate sense. After
all, when a strapping man of 250 pounds starts beating his wife, the only
thing, in the end, will prevent it is a man or a woman with a most likely
invented by a human weapon. Again, women in this respect, are still
dependent on men.
Even when women can defend themselves against men through the use of
technology, the fact is that the same technologies that women use to give
the physical parity with men were nevertheless largely invented by men,
which means that even in this respect, security and freedom of women is
always directly dependent on the will and knowledge of men. So even
technology that women can use to escape the need for men shows their
ultimate dependence on men.
Still using something men invented & # 8230; addiction never ends.
Contrary to the main thrust of this test, a woman may be objected that a
man is totally dependent on a woman in the sense that only a woman can give
birth to a man and give it life. And in this regard, women are quite
correct. But even here, the value of women depends on the goodness of men.
For make no mistake, if men, as a class, wanted to do it and, of course, no
endorsement, but the point is to clarify that could theoretically be
carried men could enslave all women so that they could not do anything but
give birth at the mercy of men. Indeed, a society where the reproduction
was carried out by the subjugation of women near total would be a
disgusting, but the fact is that such a society could survive and even
prosper to some extent, as it does in Afghanistan by example.
Force made the rules, and the only reason that such a society of absolute
oppress women has not been established in the West as it has in other parts
of the world is because Western men not allow, not because women could stop
it. After all, men still represent more "fighting" professions such as the
police and the army, and so even with modern technology, women would not be
a chance in Western society if men ever decided to get up as a collective
freedoms against women and "equality." And although the truth may be hard
to hear for women, it is the truth nonetheless.
The reason why Western women have ultimately rights: because men like this
have helped him.
Now and in the future, the only reason that Western women enjoy rights is
because, ultimately, men have tacitly allowed women to enjoy these rights.
And while some men easily allow women to have these rights because it
grants if these men more power in other regions think politicians and
vote-female fact remains that, in the end, the gains Western feminism exist
only because western men have implicitly granted permission for earnings to
exist.
If men collectively decided to change his mind tomorrow feminism, and
forcibly remove all the rights of women on a whim, it is, in fact, few
women could do to stop them. And Western women should not forget this fact.
They should remember that their existence in the West is probably the best
they could request, and to push people too far can ultimately lead to a
backlash that women may wish rather not experience.
Learn more: The Power of Feminism