Friday, May 5, 2017

Thousands of innocent people have been unjustly imprisoned because of a woman lying

Up to 23,000 current prisoners should be released from the state prison
system in Massachusetts, because the laboratory chemist woman handling
evidence in their case lied, colleague s forged signatures, and
deliberately contaminated evidence. Is the story of Annie Dookhan, dubbed &
# 8221 Superwoman; for its record productivity state crime lab.
Dookhan (then Annie Khan) in a photo 2001. Master degree of demand was a
lie.
Annie Dookhan, a woman born in Trinidad & amp; Tobago in 1977, moved to the
United States as a child, became a chemist and took a job at the state
crime lab in Massachusetts, where she earned the nickname Superwoman & #
8221; because of its ongoing laboratory testing faster and more efficient
execution, mainly on criminal drug cases. Its productivity was so high it
was currently processing four times the average labor government laboratory
worker. Or was she?
Secret Annie was not to test the samples at all, but to take the short cut
in the supine position and confirming that whatever the police the
substance was told to check for was present, or contaminate evidence or
falsify s colleague signatures guarantee the possession of evidence chain.
In the process, a laboratory of State crime was shuttered, five workers
were dismissed for lack of supervision of this rogue employee, up to 23,000
prisoners should be released from prison, and Annie pleaded guilty to
falsifying drug tests.
This is the largest dismissal of convictions in American history. But have
you heard of anything this story?
Annie arrest at his home in Massachusetts
What was his motive?
While it is generally unnecessary to assign logical reason for a woman the
actions, we can make some observations. Annie was described by his
classmates and colleagues as a kind of overachieving child, normal student,
a bit corny, wasn t really noticed, and hardworking, quiet, smart and
determined & # 8221. The only wheel authorities concluded is she wanted
positive attention from others. In other words, she just wanted to be
loved. She wanted the same thing Instagram models, girls Dubai portopotty
and whores want Attention: male attention and validation.
The proof of collusion with prosecutors and quid pro quo
Another twist is that Annie has suffered a miscarriage in 2009, and later
said she was going through a long divorce & # 8221. There are signs of
impropriety between Annie and the prosecutor of the court, Norfolk A.D.A.
George Papachristos, who was forced to resign for his direct phone and
email contact with the state lab worker. Although they could not find the
state police evidence of an affair, Annie she cheated husband suspects, and
police found emails to the D. A. she was unhappy in her marriage. Annie
made professional unethically (if not personal) promotes D.A. Her husband
warned prosecutors that Annie was a chronic liar and not to believe
everything she says.
How did she take?
In 2009, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the defendants
had the right to cons-examine the chemists who helped them to sue. Annie
now had to testify in court, and the following year, she was caught lying
about his qualifications when she claimed a master's education in
chemistry, when in fact she never took level during master s.
Because of the time required in the testimony of courtroom, the volume of
sample tested by other workers in the lab spent about 400 to 200 tests per
month. But during this same time, Annie has been tested more than 800
samples per month.

Once Annie was convicted of lying about his experience during his testimony
in the courtroom, it has been studied more closely. The fact that
productivity was double the most productive chemist s, and about 4 times
the typical workers should have raised red flags.
While monitoring shoddy supervisors took a few years to reveal his gross
incompetence and criminality finally Annie's work in state crime lab was
revealed, and she was sentenced to 3-5 years in prison to modify the
laboratory records (to say nothing of perjury, prosecutorial misconduct or
deprivation of due process of its tens of thousands of victims). She was
released on parole after serving only 2 years.
Note the soulless eyes
What is the cost to society in hours spent pursuing the investigation,
imprisonment, housing, feeding and treating 23,000 people? What is the
human cost of thousands of innocent people imprisoned by this woman's
actions? What is the cost to society of releasing dangerous criminals
early? What is the cost of a formwork indefinitely State crime lab 8 story?
The state director of the forced resignations of Laboratory Sciences Office
and the Commissioner for public health? In addition to all this, there are
the public spending hundreds of millions of dollars and # 8221; to face the
consequences of such cases.
It's difficult to quantify, but the costs are certainly more than the
punishment Annie received two years in prison. In fact, while many of its
victims are still sitting in prison, waiting to be released, Annie has
already served his time and was released on parole.
Annie facing reporters outside the courthouse
The many victims
No less than 23,000 prisoners incarcerated for Annie s 9 years in state
crime lab will soon be released. These were almost all offenses related to
low-level drugs. Most prisoners fall into one of two categories:
1. The Innocent. Thousands of victims were probably innocent. Indeed, while
the Governor Deval Patrick has appointed a new member of the cabinet to
see, if any, case, the state would try to continue again, it came with a
list of 117 of the tens of thousands. There are thousands of innocent men
sitting in jail today because this woman lied about evidence.
2. Criminal hard. Often when a suspicious person is, for example,
canvassing a neighborhood late at night with a group of thugs, there is
little it can be loaded, before taking him in the act of a violent crime.
But many of these types of criminals are known to transport drugs. Thus,
police officers search and book them for drug crimes. Regardless of the
position on the laws of the drug, it is a fact that they are easy way to
get dangerous criminals on the streets.
Is it wrong to blame Annie for the murder of Charles evals?
Many tens of thousands set to be released are undoubtedly violent
criminals, and the public is now at great risk that these thugs are
released into our neighborhoods.
An example is Donta Hood (pictured above), a man convicted in 2009 Annie
helped, who was released from prison in 2012 when the state was forced to
drop the charges due to Annie's incompetence. Eight months after being
released, Hood was arrested for the murder of Charles evals. A murder that
never would have happened if his drug sentence was carried out fairly.
How many people will be robbed, raped or murdered by criminals released
because of Annie's lying?
A pattern?
Annie an isolated incident?
Joyce Gilchrist Dindu Nuffin.
Joyce Gilchrist was a chemist in Oklahoma City who won the Black Magic
nickname for his ability to match DNA samples and other crime lab experts
could not. Joyce just lied and claimed DNA matched, when he did not, which
led to thousands unjustly imprisoned, and execution of 11 men.
One of his victims, Jeffry Todd Pierce, a husband and father of two
children, no criminal record, was falsely convicted of rape in 1986 and
released in 2001 after spending 15 of his best years in prison. The city
paid a settlement of several million dollars to Pierce, but his life is
changed forever.
Many Joyce victims have received no compensation. After Joyce was fired,
she said she ended for sexual harassment. Despite 11 men causing death,
Joyce was not charged with any crime.
Sonja Farak a real drug expert
Sonja Farak was a laboratory chemist Massachusetts crime who smoked crack
every day at work, tossing occasionally in some meth, ketamine, ecstasy and
LSD. Because why not? She didn t have to pay. She just took the high
quality hideout the police provided him like & # 8221 evidence. In addition
to using the evidence, Sonja has also started smoking and sniffing the
standard samples and # 8221; that the laboratory has kept handy to compare
with evidence seized from the street.
She did her damage for 8 years before being sentenced in 2013. Sonja worked
at another crime lab Annie, which shows the problem is systematic. Sonja
was mainly seen with sympathy. It was an abuse victim, not a criminal who
corrupted the justice system.
Four Points
1. These stories are enormous cases of injustice that many media sweep
under the carpet. Thousands of innocent lives have been seriously affected,
and people died. All because of the lies these women sought to seek
attention. While a stubborn man forced the plane is considered national
news, chances are you've never heard of the stories of these women.
2. Beware of & # 8216; Official & # 8217; claims. I take the conclusion of
a government panel, laboratory official crime or investigative body with a
grain of salt. I do not believe stories about chemical weapons (see Saddam,
Assad) just because my government says. I do not think the media or the
government or even the most important institutions today. It hurts me to
say it, but it's just the world we live in. The crime lab, where workers
are free to indulge in as much as they like free medicine, while they lie
and distort crime lab reports for a decade impunity is not a place magic of
truth or justice.
3. Women are attention whore, to incredible degrees. Women crave attention
and as they leave their 20 years if they are not a happy family and a
lifestyle that is in harmony with their feminine side, the results can be
extreme.
4. The portion of the cat is as strong as ever. Frankly, even in the course
of the year, I expect a woman responsible for the death of innocent men to
receive at least a symbolic continuation, and I expect the woman
responsible for the largest prisoner release in US history to receive a
severe punishment. But they are not. Because patriarchy or something.
For a thorough investigation of this case, see WBUR Special Report: Bad
Chemistry.
Read more: Disfiguring face of a man to the bone is not considered a
serious crime if you have a vagina

No comments: