Welcome to Political Correctness 2.0

The truth can not be hidden for a long time, especially in the Internet
age. Part of the elite recognized and discourse allowed to move from the
politically correct version 1.0 with an improved version 2.0 where more
real-talk is allowed. This allows them to build trust with an increasing
percentage of the western population hates the heaviness of the existing
program.

1.0 Political correctness was so strict and sniffing it has promoted a
reaction that is currently threatening the entire globalist establishment.
The principles of the program 1.0:
1. All races are equal
2. All genders are equal
3. Homosexuals are as heterosexual
4. Islam can and must coexist in democratic societies
5. Western civilization is the main cause harm minorities
6. nations borders sacrifice human rights
7. Review of the Jews is anti-Semitic, and we must encourage Israel to
existence
When I or other commentators referred to globalism, we're generally
describes a system of power that is built on the 1.0 program since World
War 2. The response to this program has been so intense that the
anti-globalization movement is now a broad movement that aims to reduce
both the useful idiots and puppet masters who control it.

I'm not quite sure if existing globalists decide to upgrade to a 2.0
program to maintain their control, or if they were completely new
billionaires, such as Peter Thiel, attempting a coup for their own
purposes. Whatever the reality, s probably a combination of both, some
members of the elite are now using the politically correct program updated
to appeal to those who reject the version 1.0. Here is what we have in
version 2.0:
1. Not all races are equal, but all races deserve equality
2. aren t sexes equal, but both sexes deserve equality
3. Homosexuals are as heterosexual
4. Islam can not coexist in democratic societies
5. Western civilization must be rented
6. nations borders are essential
7. Review of the Jews is anti-Semitic, and we must encourage Israel to
existence
First let's describe what hasn t changed 1.0 (3 and 7). The gays and Jews
are still a protected class because they are the highest members
orchestrating 2.0 (Peter Thiel happens to be gay). Egalitarianism in terms
of gender and race (1 and 2) haven t been completely set aside as & # 8221
equality; is still considered an ideal, but purple and red pill thoughts in
these areas are more accepted. It's good for the media operating in the 2.0
to assert that blacks are more prone to crime followed by articles mocking
feminism and other insanities of social justice.
Three points were completely reversed. The first is Islam. Attacking
religion, customs, and terrorists it breeds is fair game, and perhaps the
single most consistent of 2.0 program that is even presented by liberals
like Bill Maher. The second inversion is the praise of Western civilization
emphasis on civic nationalism, which essentially means that people must
respect the laws on immigration. Missing, however, looks at how the laws
can be changed or that specific racial demographics of a nation like the
United States should be. The final twist is the praise of national borders
as a feature that can improve the safety and welfare of existing citizens.
When I talk about political correctness 2.0, I m not talking 4chan, the alt
law, or other movements edgelord Don t limits placed on their speech, but
the ramp-structures which include new media, of Thots Pundit as Tomi
Lahren, Twitter e-celebrities, politicians and the government, especially
those that exist in the shadow Trump.

The best examples of political correctness 2.0 now are represented by
Breitbart, Rebel Digital and lite alt, who produce ideas and content that
are largely driven by the large number of people who reject the 1.0
program, but which are not ready to throw everything egalitarianism, to
discuss the Jewish question, or embrace tradition. The ripe fruit of the
program were 1.0 KKK racists who use the n-word and misogynist caveman. For
the 2.0 program, ripe fruits are Islamists low IQ, fatty feminists with
green hair, and traditional media.
Version 2.0 is a step in the right direction, and make my ideas a bit more
patriarchal accept, but will eventually fail as 1.0 did, because it relies
on deliberate concealment of truths that simply can not be hidden in the
Internet age. So I predict that 2.0 will be a lot shorter term to 1.0, not
a reactionary thrust stop where no lie can be hoisted successfully on the
public, and where no secret stays secret for long.
This article was originally published on Roosh V.
Read more: Is Western Civilization Worth Saving?