While the West is dying out, China is growing increasingly upward. What
factors allow China to be resistant leftist degeneration and immigration
Third World that the West accepts so easily?
The biological role
Within the human species are countless permutations of culture and levels
of cultural achievement. All cultures are equal, and some cultures allow
those who practice gradually conquer and displace other crops or having a
larger drive to expand or by converting to other crops because of the
cultural attractiveness members. We have seen this happen many times in
history.
The general trend we're seeing is that the K-selective populations tend to
produce crops that are more oriented towards long-term survival of the
family unit, and these crops to reach higher levels of human development .
These cultures, in turn, conquer, assimilate, or crops that are moving less
selective K.
As we all know, a cold climate exerts selective pressure in the direction
of K-selection and Agriculture exerts selective pressure in the higher IQ
direction. In fact, it is often postulated that a minimum IQ of 70 is
required for the invention of agriculture. This explains why some parts of
Africa and the entire continent of Australia has never invented
agriculture, and remained hunters and gatherers until colonization.
This also explains the well-known hierarchy of intelligence with some
sub-Saharan African groups and Australian Aborigines basically Caucasians
amid Asia Minor and Eastern Europe, Northern Europeans near the top, and
East Asians dominating the highest position with a 5-8 IQ points gap. One
can argue the validity of this information on me, but I assure you of
conclusive studies have proven to be the rule, not the exception.
Eternal civilization
In a world of many industrialized countries cucking out of existence,
Chinese culture stands. No, this is not a praise of Chinese culture. This
is a simple recognition that Chinese culture is synonymous with 5000 years
continues to this day and still smoking with apparent impunity. It
assimilates the foreign conquerors, conquered peoples least formed states
tributaries that have adopted their text, and opened the way for scientific
achievements that have changed the world.
This culture was born at about the same time that most of the ancient
cultures that we know today as the Sumerians, Greeks, Persians, Romans and
Egyptians. But when founders origins of these cultures are today
politically insignificant nations have succumbed to the Islamic barbarity
or become traps for selective debt or r shit holes torn by war, China is
strong.
China is not without problems (as any country), but it is strong, unified,
and in recognition of its former greatness. He does not cower against the
multiculturalism or politically correct. It does not work the challenge of
sovereignty. More importantly, even beyond the geographical boundaries of
China itself, Chinese culture remains strong worldwide.
Chinese communities rarely give their culture in other countries and places
with large populations of East Asia tend to offset the negative impact of
migration, selective r third world. In places like Australia, the rich
people of East Asian populations move lower driving up real estate prices,
these being white or other indigenous peoples. Those less able to perform
in a free and competitive market are pushed to continue and more fringes of
cities, leaving the center relatively crime free.
But what defines Chinese culture beyond that of Europe, and why is that if
Europe is only decades away from the Islamic Republic of Eurostan, Chinese
culture is experiencing a resurgence?
The cultural assumption pillar
The reason for the resilience of Chinese culture to corruption through
technology, ideology or demographics is the fact that the foundation of
Chinese culture is the family rather than a particular religion. While
Christian Europe has made huge levels of selective K cultural traits such
as family values, monogamy, and a strong patriarchal system, are never
organic. In fact, before the adoption of the Abrahamic religions in Europe
en masse, indigenous European cultures, while K selective enough, never
developed mimetic habituations that match the high level of civilization
attained in Christianity.
However, the intelligent use of external religion to stabilize indigenous
societies is fundamentally unstable precisely because it is mythology. The
advent inevitable scientific thinking dooms any religion in any
insignificance, as the divine force in the ether becomes less and less
common to man relatable.
Much more relevant for him, then, is the great renaissance of ideas that
can benefit from its immediate situation, whatever their position in life.
That in itself was relatively harmless if it were not the fact that almost
all of European civilization is based on this Abrahamic religion. The
gradual demystification of this religion, so, finally saw the dismantling
of European culture itself.
No wonder, then, that the Europeans seem indifferent to hostile Islamic
migrants. No European deep down wants to see Islamic rule or convert to
Islam, but when the key pillar of European culture is now relegated to the
fields of abstraction and comedy, what is there left to defend? Why stay
monogamous, why join the rationality and reason, why women bar of their own
terrible decisions, why maintain the division of labor, why defend a
patriarchal society, and why defend your borders when a cultural incentive
for you to do is crumpled under your feet?
give well-meaning men can both women and have-nots voting, set employment
quotas, and snuggle under the heels of feminist if it means getting a lick
vagina.
Chinese culture, on the other hand, took a very different approach. My
hypothesis is that because East Asians are more K-selected Europeans, there
are indigenous selective pressures were sufficient to develop a culture
that transcends all of the need for divine punishment to encourage society
to behave in the most optimal way to benefit the long-term survival. Thus,
an organic family-oriented society has emerged, and added as a result,
eliminated the possibility of dogmatic religions never become popular.
Throughout the 5,000 years of Chinese civilization, religion never held
much sway over his people, and all religious practice is simply due to a
sense of honor, courtesy, and develop lips. Many of us confuse Confucianism
to a kind of religion. But the Chinese and Koreans, Japanese and Vietnamese
brothers certainly not. Nobody worships Confucius, and nobody calls him a
god.
Confucianism, if understood in a broader perspective and rational, is
simply a researcher wandering idea of a society that has elevated the
family unit first. His lasting legacy is more than its mass acceptance
receptive Chinese society. may well have rejected a slightly less
K-selective society there.
Civilizations can t survive without raising the family unit
A culture based on the pillar of the family unit is very difficult to
corrupt. It provides mystical nothing to demystify the technological
advancement, and while political ideologies can look great and their
despots may seem larger than life with their cult of personality, relevance
to the common man does not dissipate the importance of family unity.
Indeed, it is no wonder that the preposterous Western invention of Marxism
eventually lost in its war against the Chinese culture, the latter coming
out on top, and a flamboyant pants weapons down, defecating on the charred
corpse of leftist bullshit . Feminism is also unpopular in the East Asian
societies (unless they have been westernized strength, and even then it is
hardly the fashion of the day) because men, especially fathers, are much
less likely the cave to irrational whims of women just to keep them happy
for a moment at the price of civilization.
Men and fathers are far more likely to swallow discomfort to see a woman
not getting his way to save and society from greater suffering on the
track. Even in the business world, we observe that most Chinese companies
refer to as "家" (pronounced "jia") which is literally translated
as "family." A common trope dialect, for example, is "the food of this 家
tastes better than food that 家", which means "food of the restaurant
tastes better than food restaurant."
Conclusion
I've noticed that the face of cuckoldry white male, white women are often
competing on two channels in the market of alternative coupling. Most go
for selective r men in dark environments. But a minority will end for
Asians in shitlord East. They often display features so starkly contrast
with their more selected sisters r-you can tell them apart a mile.
First, they tend to be more educated in appropriate areas such as the hard
sciences. Second, they are much less promiscuity and much more feminine,
with the production of higher estrogen. Finally, they defer to men in a
relationship, seeking to never exercise power, and always appreciate the
man's driving ability.
I believe that in the broader context of biology, these women (and also men
who really get into the cultures of East Asia) are the k-selective white
group, and in the past have been handsomely rewarded for both sexual and
economic European companies because of their greater productivity and
civility. In the modern age, however, their sexual market value plummets
because they no longer represent what is fashionable.
Whatever the West again degeneration happens to be invented, and it always
seems to come from the West, worry that China's rise in the family will
have a built-in resistance to it. The white race is in trouble, and until
they imitate the Chinese and their family worship, they will be replaced by
Muslims or other breeds third world sooner than you think.
Read more: Is Western Civilization Worth Saving?
No comments:
Post a Comment