Friday, August 25, 2017

Women will never be taken seriously until they fight to be included in the project

Like any man over the age of 18 knows, registration with the Selective
Service System is mandated by federal law for men only. The consequences
for not doing so are terrible, and were well covered by ROK. Registering
with the Selective Service offers young men the names in a database to use
in case of war, demanding that men are involuntarily conscripted into
military service.
A military volunteer

The project in America ended with the Vietnam War, and we had an army of
volunteers since. Our military, in the 40s, most since the project ended,
was involved in conflicts around the world, without having to restore the
project. In that time, millions of young men, including myself and many of
you reading this have registered and are essentially ready to be fired in
the war at the request and approval of Congress President.
But this was not necessary, despite the first and second Iraq war and the
war in Afghanistan, the longest war in US history Our military volunteers,
according to the Ministry of Defense from 2017 proposal of budget for the
year is more than 2 million people strong, suggesting that military service
is a relatively safe and rewarding career choice for many people, men and
women.
I never have to visit the websites feminist, and I'm not too aware of their
main problems, in addition to "gender equality" (except in regard to the
struggle for the rights of men). So I searched and visited some sites and
even what their main issues looked. I am confused. They do not even know
what they are fighting for.

I finally condense their battle down to a few key issues: gender equality,
equal pay, eliminating the "rape culture", and the body of a woman is her's
to do with as she chooses (weight, abortion, clothing, etc.). There are
more, but these seem to be some of the major issues.
Feminists have the freedom to fight for these causes because they live in a
country with a government guided by a sacred document called the
Constitution and the principles of this document are preserved and
protected by our military. If a foreign invader successfully defeats our
military, we lose our Constitution and the rights granted by it.
I can not think of a better cause, or a better way for feminists to really
and honestly fight for gender equality, for them to organize and March on
the President and Congress, asking to be included the mandatory
registration process A Selective Service. Then they can join the ranks of
all men aged 18 and sign up to be potentially conscript military service
and potentially die for their country in combat.
If women were to ever be drafted, as unlikely as it is, they will be
written right next to the men, theoretically. I don t believe that it would
actually happen in combat positions, however. I think, good or bad, that
women would be drafted in support positions and men would be placed in
combat roles. Maybe wrong. That women would be better or worse in the fight
will be addressed.
What is true is that women have an easier time with the physical demands of
basic training. They are not required to do as many push-ups and minimum
execution time is prolonged. Why? Well, the four main sectors military
believe they are the weaker sex. See tables for minimum requirements of
physical fitness.
The army believes that women are weaker and slower
the fact of the Navy
& # 8230; and Air Force
& # 8230; and Marines
The physical demands aren t the only thing easier for women. How about
something more basic, like hair? Women are better there too. You might
think that hair is no big deal, but an old, hair is a very big 18 years,
even a man.
Belieb it, his hair is important
It took him over an hour to get that Styles
Now take a look at some Marines men and women in recruit training (training
camp).
Shaved stubble, without exception
They can keep their hair
So when women take time, they can literally let their hair down and look
like women. A man with a shaved head, these days, seems that it might be
something other than military. This is another example of inequality, but
better treatment for women in the military.
What about the salary? Good news, ladies and salary is based on the
ranking. An E-5 sergeant did the same, regardless of the genitals.
I can already hear the argument about push-ups: men are stronger, then they
should do more. The men run faster, so they must have the fastest time.
Okay, but women have smaller bodies, so they aren t proportionally
equivalent? Look at this girl of 17 years:

So, the army was equivalent between men and women and gender lowering
physical fitness standards for women? As there are hundreds of thousands of
women in the military, maybe they can play in this battle. When they have
time.
What fight? Another well-known women about to be deployed is the increase
in pregnancies. But I'm sure there are many women willing to die for their
country if given the opportunity. I, for one, would not want to fight next
to someone who has been allowed to enter the reduced physical standards. At
least not in the infantry. Just as I would not want to be rescued by a
firefighter woman who was in quota as they do in Australia. However,
planes, is another story.
Some studies have suggested that women make better fighter pilots because
they have better hand-eye coordination, faster reflexes, and can handle the
G-forces better because of their smaller frames. That may be true. In fact,
it seems logical to me, and I have no reason to doubt such claims. I've
also heard that women don t have the same killing instinct that men and
they hesitate a split second longer than men, especially in cases where
there is a possibility of civil involvement or gunfire friends. I believe
these statements, too. I've never flown in combat, but I know of fighter
pilots, none flew with women. Maybe one day these truths will be revealed.
Feminists fight for the project or STFU
Do I want old women in combat 18 years? No, I do not want young men as 18
years in the fight. But, as mentioned above, we have an army of volunteers,
and women probably just stay on the list until they were too old to be
drafted, if a project would never happen. We have a lot of volunteers, and
we had a lot of volunteers for over 40 years. So it's a safe but
significant struggle for feminists to try.
If they made their voice loud enough, they could win this fight, too. They
have already turned the consensual drunken sex rape. They also obtained the
media and the rest of the liberals believe that they are only 76 cents (or
74, 77, 78) for every dollar men make to do exactly the same job.
So why not fight for the best example of gender equality as possible? If
they ever do, and they fight hard enough to win, I will become a feminist.
A proud feminist waving the flag. However, I am convinced beyond measure
that this will never happen, because I still believe that feminists will
never fight for true equality in anything.
Learn more: The US government will Delaying Full Backs and War Project for
Women

No comments: