A video posted on 28/07/2017 provides a long-awaited explanation of patreon
Banning s policies. At first, said Jack Conte
Many people will just try to find holes in our logic.
Challenge accepted!
CEO patreon on content policy, Lauren South and IGD
It explains why patreon approved the accounts for defending Europe, South
Lauren and IDG (It's Going Down). He said that it was not political,
entirely based on observable behavior manifests & # 8221;. He often repeats
that phrase, sometimes words flashing on the screen to drive the point
home. He explains:
We're talking about the removal of a person income. The authority to take a
human income is a responsibility sobering. It is not something to do on a
whim.
No argument here so far. Many people receive much of their income sales and
online donations, which need platforms (such as patreon) to receive
payments. Although my day job involves remodeling in partnership with one
of my regular friends, I can certainly relate to being subject to the whims
of some company or other entity. Also, here's how several organizations
receive their funding, so that the ideological neutrality is important.
His explanation why defend Europe and South Lauren was banned
He explains that they were blocking a ship supposedly Rescue & # 8221;.
Lauren says:
So that's a ship called The Aquarius was done smuggle migrants from the
Libyan coast for the last time, and they're just going out again to bring
more illegal migrants and we're going to stop them.
According to a US News & amp; Article World Report & # 8212; that doesn t
seem to disapprove of illegal immigration & # 8212; these vessels pick up
the migrants off the coast of Libya. They're in vessels considered
unseaworthy (I suspect that this implies a much overloaded beyond capacity)
that are operated by human traffickers. So:
Almost all migrants picked up by charities are brought into Italy instead
of Libya, which is considered hazardous, and about half seeking asylum.
Nearly 200 000 asylum seekers living in the country's shelters funded.
I am not an expert in maritime law, and I doubt that Jack Conte is either.
Anyway, a few facts stand out in this camp Saints racket:
Libya was good enough for illegal aliens to come here in the first place,
as a springboard to countries with generous social benefits.
Libya is a tough neighborhood, but Tunisia and Egypt & # 8212; right next
door & # 8212; aren t as bad.
However, the best option is to send the illegal aliens to their country of
origin.
Illegal immigration is a crime, and those who help it are accessories.
European governments would stop it if they worked for their people.
Apparently they have other priorities.
This is an invasion. Although an invasion is usually carried out by armed
soldiers, that n t necessary because the Eurocrats don t defend their
country, a government job number.
Therefore, it's misleading to defend Europe and South portray Lauren as
culprits rather than illegal aliens and their enablers.
The truth about & # 8221 refugees;
A ship full of scientists, engineers and industrial
Always trying to keep the high ground, the video shows the
Heartstring-tugging photo Alan Kurdi, Syrian child washed ashore (obviously
not wearing a flotation device). What most people aren t ask about this
unfortunate episode is that a small child was made on a dinghy packed to
twice its rated capacity. In addition, most people do not know that before
the ill-fated journey, he and his parents were actually living in Turkey,
which is still one of the most prosperous places and the most enlightened
of the Middle East. Yet the call for greener pastures still was too
tempting.
I'll grant that Jack Conte is concerned about migrants in dangerous
conditions at sea, the risks they assume voluntarily re. Yet where is the
concern about crime and terrorism that migrants bring with them? There is a
reason why any European with a brain (category not included their
governments) doesn t want them there.
Migrants are fleeing violent and dysfunctional places like sub-Saharan
Africa, Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. (In fact, many Syrian refugees and #
8221; are elsewhere, and very few are women and children, but all that's
another matter.) When they arrive on Europe's magic dirt & # 8221; they don
t want to assimilate; on the contrary, they bring violence and dysfunction
with them.
All these humanitarian NGOs had better try their luck to help fix these
companies, rather than allowing stable countries invade. Am I just a great
cynic, or could there be another agenda?
more ban
Free speech is meaningless if it only covers & # 8221 approved;
perspectives.
Within a minute of the ten-minute video regarding holding leftist IGD, says
he was banned for Doxing and encourage sabotage railroads. Then this:
There will probably be many people who say we're just taking down IGD s the
page just seems we're politically impartial and fair, so I want to cut off
this argument here.
Later, he explained how their examination policies of the content. Oki
Doki. Am I still a great cynic, or could it have something to do with
hypocrisy patreon called for a month ago?
Finally, he says he'll fix. A component implements an appeal process
because:
... [E] very creator deserves fair treatment and a second chance. We are
committed to building a more robust alert system.
I seriously doubt that this will be extended retroactively to defend Europe
or South Lauren, but we'll have to see on radicalinskis IGD. I have to
credit Jack for good rhetorical skills, though; it to do much as a lawyer
or lobbyist.
What he doesn t explain why patreon prohibited Occidental Dissent & # 8212;
Did they hurt anyone feelings with a Confederate flag or something? And how
about Wife with a purpose? The most controversial thing this homeschooling
mother Mormon said was that white families should have more children and #
8212; oh damn! She explained later that she wasn t being completely serious
(if this sounds like a good idea for me); again, is to say criminal
activity?
For that matter, why prohibit Paypal Roosh? Do they consider his Rasputin
beard-powered kratom a weapon of mass destruction?
Why freedom of expression issues
The Left used to champion freedom of expression, especially in the 18th
century when liberalism was always a good thing. Even in the late 1960s,
they were still talking a good game about it. Then, when the structure of
the leftist power reached the decisive cultural domination, they turned
around & # 8212; funny that.
The left is in total panic on recent developments. They failed to elect
Hillary, a major setback. In addition, the public is beginning to push back
and question the stories left we were intimidated for decades. That's why
we're seeing a growing trend of -platforming & # 8221; dissenting voices,
and cutting funds for them. Doing this for everyone of a millimeter to the
right of William F. Buckley is the current year big fashion.
Social media companies too censor speech. Even governments are colluding
with them. In addition, Germany can control t & # 8221 refugees; wild
running, but they can arrest people for political opinions, as once the
Stasi did.
The left is so well-funded that they can pay off their bus and shakers in
remote cities to raise hell. (In fact, it's good argument to load the
globalists and their front groups under the RICO Act, but I'll have more
legal minds ponder that one.) However, the rest of us rely on support base.
I can see that Jack Conte wants patreon ensure users that they're going to
be fair and respect the freedom of expression. Unfortunately for him, all
without platforming by patreon and others like them is way down. Their
overbroad and nauseating hypocrisy are the source of alternative
institutions like Counterfund, to emerge.
Governments dissenting prohibiting About tyrannical, but an oligopoly
leftists companies doing the same aren t much better. Banks and telcos gift
t micromanage their customers on ideology and the platforms nor should
payment processing and social media. Finally, orthodox views can grow even
under censorship, but freedom of expression is a vital necessity for
dissenting opinions. That why this is important.
More: Riots African Islamists sweep Suburbs lively Paris
No comments:
Post a Comment