Is it time renames Alt-right?

In the life of a political or religious movement, there may be some events
that make wise for the movement to rebuild an image. And recent events that
occurred in Charlottesville ROK which each player is unaware, it can
certainly be time for the alt-right to consider such a change in marketing.
But why would such a plan of action necessary at this time? Because, quite
simply, the right alt tag was severely perhaps irreparably contaminated
with alt Reich / alt white sub-faction in the broader alt law. And if the
perception of this stain is fair or not, the undeniable fact is that it is
in fact now perceived as being there, and that perception will remain there
in the public mind in a wider foreseeable future, if not permanently .
Therefore, it is a serious problem for the alt law.

Thus, in light of this problem, it is suggested that non-white alt Reich
faction / non-alt alt of use from this event as an opportunity rather than
a setback. In particular, the incident Charlottesville can be used as an
opportunity to make a clean break with the alt alt faction Reich law by the
rest of the alt right (meaning the so-called alt West lite alt, and Vox Day
alt -style right). Indeed, this event is a chance for the great alt law to
specify that the faction of the alt alt Reich is currently its own separate
entity; and if that faction is seen as the "right alt" as a whole, then so
be it, for the alt real right will move to another label.
However, this raises the question: What is the new label for the alt be
right?
Alt A new law term
While trying to rename a movement is never easy, and no label satisfy
everyone, I propose three candidates as potential replacements for the
term "right alt".
No way to win hearts and American or European esprits-.
First, there is "nationalist right" label. It's simple, to the point and
easily spread the idea that this is a group that is right-handed primarily
focused on the nation rather than anything else, like the alt is just wide.
This is a good label, and perhaps the easiest to adopt quickly and
naturally. It is also excellent because the term "nationalist" means
exactly what the alt-right movement is trying to achieve:
Nationalism is a range of political, social and economic characterized by
promoting the interests of a particular nation, particularly in order to
achieve and maintain independence and full sovereignty, on the group's
homeland. Political ideology therefore holds that a nation should govern
without unwanted interference on the outside, and is linked to the concept
of self-determination. Nationalism is more oriented to the development and
maintenance of a national identity based on common characteristics such as
culture, language, race, religion, political objectives or belief in a
common ancestry. Nationalism therefore seeks to preserve the nation's
culture. It also often involves a sense of pride in the nation's
achievements and is closely linked to the notion of patriotism. (Wikipedia:
Nationalism)
Thus, a member of the nationalist right is one that is similar to an
ethno-nationalist ideology, willing and all ethnic groups and all political
factions sharply divided within these ethnic groups have the right to
self-determination and to have their own country where they can live in
peace.
Thus the nationalist right label is a strong choice, but there are two
other options to consider that can have a rhetorical advantage "nationalist
right" label does not.
The second choice is the term "nationalist conservative." The purpose of
this term would be to create a bridge between the nationalists and the
conservative movement. It also transmit the nationalist emphasis alt good
people who may have called themselves conservatives in the past. However,
given the link between conservativism and political cowardice (see: cucks),
this may not be the best term to use.
Not the image the nationalist right wants to present!
Finally, should also be considered "universal nationalist" of the term.
This term has the advantage of using the terminology universalist rhetoric,
which is generally considered the domain of the left; thus, it subverts the
left of this minor way, while still articulating the fact that nationalism
is the emphasis is put on. Moreover, it is very difficult to be against the
universal nationalism, especially as most people believe in the Western
idea of ​​self-determination.
At the same time, this universal nationalist label also has the advantage
of removing the political labels of "left" and "right" itself. This is an
advantage because the universal nationalist can say that it is not opposed
to the left or right creating his own nation, he just think they should
have that right regardless of their political affiliation. Ergo, if crazy
California progressives wish to start their own nation, universal
nationalist has no problem with such a plan.
Ultimately, though, may be "universal nationalist" label is more of an
explanation of what the "nationalist right" is, rather than its own
separate term, and so the two terms can be used to interchangeably.
So perhaps the best term to replace the "right alt" tag is the
term "nationalist right."
Advantages and disadvantages of change
Now, like any new image, there are advantages and disadvantages to take
such action. As for the disadvantages, new label as nationalist right will
gain traction and lost ground makeup brand change. However, in this case,
the benefits clearly outweigh the disadvantages.
The type of nationalism winning culture.
First, the new label enables a clear differentiation between the
nationalist right and the next alt alt Reich law, and this differentiation
is the following: if you see Nazi salutes and Nazi flags and Nazi symbols,
or talking white supremacy and racial domination, while not part of the
nationalist right. The nationalist right can agree that these groups have
the right to self-determination, but these groups are not part of the
nationalist right. (And as a side note, who the hell wants to be associated
with an outdated political faction that lost the war he engaged in? Not me,
for sure.)
Second, the term nationalist right is positive, and thus promotes a
positive agenda. It is, in essence, for everything found in 16 points
Alt-right Vox Day, but it adds the seventeen point the alt-Reich is not
part of it.
Third, the term nationalist right shows that such a group is not
an "alternative" to anything, but that is a perfectly reasonable and
sensible position to be adopted by most people right if this position was
explained to them properly. Thus, the nationalist right has a broad appeal
tent and traditional sounds.
Play the left
Finally, some might accuse me of playing the game on the left trying to
rebrand the right alt and the distance of the new label alt alt faction
Reich law. And in some ways, this is true. But it is also true that
sometimes your political opponents win an important battle, or your side is
such a big mistake, that taking drastic action is needed. And I think this
is one of those times.
Playing the left s game? May be. But there may be a strategic victory
achieved a tactical loss.
In addition, there is also the idea of ​​cutting a poisonous branch, and
the term alt law may be just enough poison that must be cut-off. At the
same time, it is also cutting the dead wood, and the Reich alt-who seem
more interested in their own version of the under Nazi signaling that
win-Deadwood are the right alt must separate from. And one way to do this
is through a rebranding campaign that clearly delineates the Reich alt the
rest of the players of the Nationalist side.
So, in the end, it's time for the broader right alt to turn into the
nationalist right, a group that supports and seeks universal nationalism,
including himself. This is the best way to move forward, and it is the best
way to actually reach that alt-right seeks to achieve.
PS: Please note that as the origin of the idea of ​​Alt Christianity, I
note simply that it would also be possible to rebrand Christianity as Alt
Nationalist Christianity, and that 21 ceux- one of the movement would still
stand without problems.
More: Patriarchal Nationalism: The Societal system Only that can save the
West