Perhaps the biggest lie of the 21st century is that men need women more
than women need men. We have all heard the musings tired and hackneyed a
million times now. "Women would not start wars, men can not create life all
they can do is to destroy the world we be better governed if all women", so
on and so forth .
Of course, this overlooks all the historical atrocities committed under the
& # 8212 matriarchal governments; Indeed, queendoms throughout history were
27 percent more likely to invade or attack the rival nations regimes headed
by men & # 8212; or nearly 70 percent of all filicides are committed by
mothers, or factoid Freakonomics downright bamboozled that nations with
women heads of government tend to have statistics on the remarkably
reported rape more than their neighbors, countries headed by men.
But "reason" that was probably the most often cited to explain why women,
hypothetically, are more important for men than vice versa involves
procreation. Women, after all, have the bellies and eggs, and without
these, humanity could not continue. Of course, this logic becomes a chicken
and an egg larf since bellies and eggs are almost useless without sperm,
and it is not long before falling into unnecessary tautological argument.
But when things become really screwy is the long-standing thesis and long
propagated that men can be controlled by women simply by denying them sex.
The idea that men are so indebted to the vagina that all their actions may
be manipulated by their (heterosexual) desires is not a new, post-trope
Hippie & # 8211; he goes as far as 400 BC Greece, as evidenced by the
Aristophanes play Lysistrata (which for those of you who are not too keen
on antiques, is a group of women stopping a war by refusing to go in bed
with their husbands until they stop fighting.)
The particular crass and crude Brooke Candy rapper reiterated the
assumption of old age in the music video quite blasphemous 2013 for his
song "Pussy makes the rules," which includes the refrain rather
say "bitches know that we have the power in the pussy, because you
significant pain and turn your brain slip ".
It is difficult not to see a spate of toxic femininity in these words.
There is nothing trivial about extolling the virtues of a vagina
ideologically militarized, there is nothing innocent encourage listeners to
transform their sex organs in the methods of control, manipulation and
domineering over others.
Alongside the horrible social influence of feminism third wave & # 8212; a
philosophy that more or less presents men as inferior, in order to legally
and culturally disparage those gonads to second-class citizens and # 8212,
perhaps it should not be surprising that many 'technically heterosexual men
would eventually abandon the pursuit of entirely women and instead of
pursuing the embrace of men posing as women.
Of course, there's a woman. It must be if it's wearing earrings!
Chicks with dicks-complex
It googling not take much to find the online community after the online
community of men "rights" that came to a fetish drag queens, transvestites,
fembois, transsexual male-female, t-girls, shemales and & # 8212; perhaps
especially & # 8212; traps (this being, men who dress women do not tell
their partners their actual sex, often with the hope to "convert" their
boyfriends in the full-time homosexuality) as alternatives to the sexual
cult object traditional female.
The term mode is femmephilic polysexuality, which essentially means a
sexual attraction to a person with characteristics traditionally female,
regardless if they have a vagina. This part, I think, is in fact a huge
amount of sense.
There is no way around & # 8211; Today's women are nearly as attractive
they were 20 years ago. The Great Big Lie third wave of feminism, with all
its body positivity gibberish, convinced the women that it is okay to be
morbidly obese, the dyke-ish, unfavorable forms even basic hygiene and walk
with full blown mustache, and that men will just need to change their
preconceived notions of beauty and roll with it. After all, women have
vaginas, not them, and the men will do anything to reverse their precious
seed in them, even if it means bumping uglies with 400 pounds, smelly,
tatted up Skankasaurus, right?
If anything, the rise of femboi / trap subculture is a direct reactionary
statement to the feminisation of the American woman. There is no denying
it: a porn star transsexual as Sarina Valentina is certainly more appealing
than a "real feminist" like Andrea Dworkin, while Cam-Transvestite Queen
handjob Paige James is undoubtedly prettier than these famous women and
strong organic proud that Lena Dunham and Leslie Jones.
They have all the traditional characteristics of female beauty (including
breast, but they can be artificial), they are almost always thinner and
cleaner than the global feminist, and they usually do not engage in heavy
identity misandrist virulently policy "real" women. In fact, the only major
difference is, well, they have two sets of balls and a cock to go with
them ... and there is a pretty strong chance he is more than yours, too.
Remember: if you don t think it's hot, you have committed a hate crime.
How liberation of women created transexual fetishization
I do not know the technical aspects here, and I'm not even going to pretend
that I do, either. I guess any kind of voluntary on-penis penis contact is
gay by nature, and no matter how much of hormone injections transexual
gets, they still will have a Y chromosome and the enzymes they for sperm
production. There are entire forums out there dedicated to "straight" guy
deflowered by traps, which seems to suggest a pre-existing strong enough
sense of homosexual tendencies.
But by the same token, it seems that there are many guys out there who) are
not "real" men attractive and b) would never engage in adult activities
with another guy who want to get with trannies, then maybe call it a
strictly gay phenomenon is not quite good etiquette.
Anyway, this concrete fact remains: a ton of guys out there do not want to
have sex with women, but they want to have sex with men dressed as women.
This is an amazing social phenomenon which I suppose can not be explained
in terms of toxic femininity. What would drive a man who is sexually
attracted to the female form in the arms, legs and buttocks of another man
with man boobs, a wig and a $ 200 worth of makeup on her face? What other
explanation enough for why men ask their lovers have all the classic
features of a woman, except to make them a baby (and if cultural
priestesses as Brooke sweets are to believe, man-trapping) genitals?
Just how ugly women should get & # 8212; physically and behaviorally & #
8212; for men to say no thanks to the cat for a good old fashioned hammer
blows rectal? How can you even begin to understand how these fringe fetish
subcultures even came to exist without first recognizing that women have
done something very, very wrong in the first place?
Thank you very much, feminism. Thank you all * damn * much.
Pussy is not what it was
Think, for a minute, how your behavior must be deleterious for men, in
bulk, to reject the more innate human impulses and # 8211; the desire to
procreate. Unfortunately, taking a peek at 400 pounds, man hating
Tumblrinas and armada of liberal arts majors dress as vaginas to protest
against the alleged patriarchal system there, perhaps against this
behavior-changing surprising fact at least some sense.
If hardcore feminists are really looking to turn their vaginas in weapons
of ideological war, perhaps this "heterosexual" tranny-chasing phenomenon
is a response entirely predictable & # 8211; Men who opt for the lesser of
two degenerations, if you want. Alas, as perverse as this
tranny-fetishization can be, it is nevertheless a stark reminder that even
regarding genital pleasure issues, women do not dominate the market as much
as they think they do.
Regarding sexual pleasure, men can do with the occasional escort service
and the inevitable wave of hyper-realistic sex robots, and where
reproduction is concerned, high-tech Petri dishes are probably decades away
make them totally useless women. Women, in contrast, can never live without
incalculable contributions to society men & # 8211; cars designed by men,
roads built by men, central supervised by men, technology infrastructure
created by men, etc.
And as deplorable and decadent as it may be, the transsexual issue proves
that the cat is no longer the great women of cultural asset cards on the
male species. Again, feminists do responsible for their own obsolescence:
if sex is literally all you have to offer, not just a matter of time until
men have found a way to get less expensive, easier and without all the
nonsense -Politics tribes?
Read more: You Go Girl-ism is more toxic than Feminism
No comments:
Post a Comment