Friday, June 16, 2017, in New York, Laura Loomer rebel media attacked the
controversial scene almost Trump killing Shakespeare in the Park
recreational Jules César. Once on stage, Loomer has interrupted the game
and yelled about the violent rhetoric that the game was depicting
implicitly against Donald Trump and the political right.
Moments after Loomer came on stage, another protester named Jack Posobiec
stood in the crowd and began to compare them to Nazi propaganda. In
essence, it was an excellent use of the left's own tactics against them,
and he gave a foretaste of the left of his own medicine. And on Saturday,
other protesters again interrupted the game to protest against the same
problems.
Of course, in response to these events, the standard "respectable
conservatives responded with disgust. David French National Review tweeted
that "Everyone" right defending the BS that came down to the game tonight
(June 16 2017) is showing himself tribalism, non-conservative & # 8221.
Ben Shapiro, wrote the Daily Wire called the incident silly snowflake-ism
and argued that "& # 8230; the right was in grave danger of capitulating to
hate speech left the argument by reversing the left & # 8221.
read statements like this, it soon becomes clear why the standard
Conservatives have failed to retain much of anything, they are like France
during World War II, or, at best, perhaps the Italy. In fact, when reading
comments like Shapiro and French, one has to wonder if the two curators, or
other preservatives like them, have always found themselves in a real
physical confrontation.
The reason this is doubtful because someone who was in a one-of-a fight
knows that when you are faced with an existential threat, and if you fight
Queensbury rules while your enemy is not, then chances are very good that
you will lose this battle. While punk comes to you with a bottle sawtooth
after throwing dirt in your eyes, and you are worried about hitting below
the belt with your courteous "punches & # 8221; You probably leave this
fight in a body bag, and he won t.
Well, the left is a punk, and they came to the right with a bottle sawtooth
for some time, so is it surprising that some on the right have decided to
start fighting dirty as the left did .
You do not worry about the rules of boxing when this guy comes to you!
Note also that there is necessarily anything immoral dirty climbing and the
fight against if the situation requires. After all, even the cops are
allowed to use all the tactics and strength needed to control an attacker
and keep the safety of the public, as long as the force is proportional to
the attack and as the force used is in response to a attack.
So if talk fails and a gangbanger pulls a gun on a cop, it is quite legal
for the cop to stop this threat using all kinds of tactics of lethal force
is necessary, either shooting, shots knife, batoning, choking, or something
else. The key point is that the cop has to stop the threat.
Jack Posobiec denouncing gambling as working Goebbels
Even in large-scale conflicts this idea of mutual escalation tactics and
proportionate response was seen as necessary. For example, in World War II,
when the Germans began to use chemical weapons on a large scale, the Allies
not only buckshot and concern as if the old rules still applied. No, they
have begun to also use chemical warfare until the other side has learned
from painful experience that was enough, and that the use of chemical
warfare was simply not worth the cost.
Indeed, appealed to Germany's better nature does not prevent the use of
chemical weapons. And policy arguments do not sway either. No, only pain
and evil received to experience the same tactics they used was sufficient
to teach the Germans not to use chemical weapons again after the end of the
First World War. Well, the same is true for the left today.
appeal to principles and rational arguments do not work with the left, as
has been highlighted for years. But the painful experience can change a
man's mind left fairly quickly; Consider, for example, that the Antifa
thugs are not anything more eager to attack right after receiving a beating
in exchange for their problems.
In World War 1, the two parts of the gas used, but one side did in a
self-defense response to the other, and that is a difference that makes all
the difference.
At the same time, we should not be surprised by the fact that many people
left to learn that the painful experience rather than rational arguments.
After all, more than two told us a thousand years ago, Aristotle in his
Rhetoric of the book, some people are simply immune to rational argument
and instruction, and these people learn that their swinging emotions and
experiences.
Do you really think that so much has changed in human nature since
Aristotle's time that his point is hanging? Of course not. And not only
Aristotle was right, but the left actually embodies the kind of person that
spoke of Aristotle (although leftists think probably even the right).
So the point is that when in a war, and the culture war is a war (just a
war which has avoided large-scale violence so far), you almost certainly
lose the war if you are not willing to engage in the use of some tactics
that seem unpleasant and even dangerous when they are not in such a
conflict. This is especially the case if they are the same tactics that the
enemy is the most painful and effective against them.
And since the left likes to project, this means that the tactics they use
against the law are more likely to be very effective against them. Hence
the need to use the tactics of the left against them.
It must also be remembered that the purpose of using the enemy's own
tactics against them is not to rejoice damage it and causes, but rather to
educate them by the only means that they learn: namely, pain emotional. And
this harsh education aims to teach the use of very tactics they endorse is
ultimately anyone's advantage.
Thus, if the left stop its attacks intolerant, then it will be right. But
if the left does not stop using such tactics, so will the right, and so
there will be mutually assured destruction (MAD). However, better madness
of MAD-and convulsion after rupture of the United States in two different
countries can losing to the left.
After all, if left Backdown even face their own tactics against them in a
path of mutual destruction, then it is best to know what made early, so
that other measures, such as a boost for the secession, can begin in
earnest.
Ultimately, it is true that sometimes respond in kind to the extreme
brutality may be too shocking to contemplate, but lose a war to anyone
willing to be so brutal is even worse. For example, just consider what
would have happened to the world was the US, facing a Soviet nuclear arms
race, decided to unilaterally disarm nuclear weapons after seeing the
damage that nuclear weapons have caused. If it had passed, North America
would probably be a nuclear wasteland today, everyone in Europe would be to
call each other & # 8221 comrade.
Well, the left are the Soviets and their tactics are cultural nuclear
weapons today. Either the law starts using these tactics to make a
relaxation based on an understanding of social and mutual assured
destruction cultural or lose the right. After all, the left has a grip on
large swathes of the media, academia, business, the judiciary and the
government bureaucracy, not to mention a great base vote, so it is not as
if the right has major benefits in other areas.
Moreover, history attests, and the last generation or so in the United
States asserts, the broad masses in the country will probably just swing
and move with cultural trends, by absorbing and largely simply accepting
cultural changes come their way from that which side is stronger. As such,
the masses and the conservative standard, will not be much help right
overnight.
The West had decided not to stockpile & # 8221 evil; nuclear weapons, while
Soviet soldiers would probably have marched across Europe. So sometimes,
MAD is the only way to go.
Thus, in light of all the above, the law has a choice to make: either act
as a "respectable conservative and most likely lose culture anyway, as they
have done for decades or fight to another in a way that teaches actually
left the hard lesson that we all need perhaps to stop these behaviors
before destroying us and our freedoms.
More: Two powerful tactics to win the culture war
No comments:
Post a Comment