This week we continue the analysis of last year's press conference after
the jogging Roosh were canceled. We started from the analysis of brain
death questions that journalists ask that should make you question their
intelligence. Click here to read the first part.
Would you say that the media is misinterpreting the best thing that ever
happened to you?
Do you go cunt narcissistic. This is not about you. Your job is to
disseminate interesting or important news. You are not new. The fact that
you affected someone's life in a positive or negative way should never be
new. Go home, go straight home, do not pass go, do not collect $ 200, go
directly to your wardrobe, and you hang you lying piece of garbage.
How many guards do you have?
Seriously? Unless you're interviewing MC Hammer about his surroundings, how
could this be interesting to everyone, unless you plan to share information
so that the guys could be attacked?
What do you do the next two days?
This is the type of bad question I cringe after asking a girl when I miss
something interesting to say. You're asking at a news conference live? Do
you even play the elderly?
How often you come back for your mom's meatloaf?
I'll give this guy the benefit of the doubt that he is just trying to be
friendly. But an inappropriate press conference.
Have you had any problems yet to travel abroad? Do you plan to try to go to
Australia?
I m considering stopping this article if don t improve matters. How many
different ways can I say this question was irrelevant and boring & #
8221 ?; Guys, read about some game day openers and conversation skills.
What does your mom think of all this?
DING DING DING! We have a winner! Someone asked an interesting question!
Now she shouldn & # 8217; t be part of the story at all, and only is,
because of the media and Doxing lie, but, in the circumstances, is
something people might actually be interested in knowing. Answer: She's
angry against you, media!
Do you agree that if a girl is too drunk to consent to sexual relations,
and you have sex with her, which is legally defined as rape?
(Reporters began arguing between each other that the legal definition of
rape.)
The legal definition of rape is a matter of fact, which can be verified by
consulting local codes. The definition varies from one place to another.
The legal definition does not affect what an individual person thinks
labeling a certain behavior. Roosh doesn t even live in the legal
competence of journalists do, and its opinion on the law is not about what
the law of a place called objectively. Stupid question. As your fellow
journalists agreed.
What do you think about Bill Cosby?
What is your favorite ice cream flavor? Roosh doesn even know Bill Cosby. I
usually don someone HEAL the opinion of someone they haven t met and don
know.
How did it become your problem?
It is not a question. What is it & # 8221;? The implication is rape, but
doesn journalist mean, because he doesn t want it to be as obvious as it is
obsessed with rape. And yet, it's obvious to everyone there, rape has
become a problem because the media lied about it and made a question. Like
Milo Yiannopoulos is now blocked talk about homosexual sex among minors,
the media is what makes a question, and the only reason it is being
discussed.
Are you happy?
It was more a forced issue. This girl couldn & # 8217; t think of anything
to say, but Roosh called it. We'll chalk this up to the friendly curiosity.
How much do you cost?
Why do you want to know? Are you interested in quantifying the damage of
your lies? Or are you just being a dick?
What is your vision for the future of male / female relationships?
And here we have our second interesting question! And the first one with
any sort of journalistic merit that a journalist could turn into an
interesting article.
Some jerk in the back when pressed a question said, These guys have already
asked most of the questions I would have asked and # 8221.
REALLY!??????? I ask more interesting questions of a homeless stranger!
In addition to anti-PC stuff, what do you like about Donald Trump?
This is a matter of personal background might be a little interesting in a
sit-down interview, so we'll give him half a point.
Why did you cancel running meetups?
And my faith is restored briefly, we get a third real question, and the
second that the journalistic merit. What would have happened if the
tracksuits were canceled? How did you weigh this decision? Someone give
this girl a gold star.
Why the secret meetings?
What I mean when I speak of absurd questions, of course. You can take a
goatherd of Afghanistan, to explain briefly some men meetup group has been
labeled as a rapist club by the media, and they had to cancel their
meetings, and he would be able to tell you why all meetings shall be held
in private (in fact, it would probably be confused with a group of
journalists who have the power over what people do in their private time
together, but you get my point). If you can t face it, turn in your
journalistic credentials immediately, if you haven t yet already lost your
job.
Kudos to Roosh able to respond calmly and honestly to this question. I have
no patience.
How many girls have you had sex?
Make Lemonade yellow pencils
I congratulate Roosh to have the patience to sit through these stupid,
ridiculous questions of & # 8221 Professional; & # 8221 journalists. To the
impartial observer, they were boring and stupid. For someone personally
affected by their lies, you have enraged treat the issue trivially and
amateurism.
Congratulations for taking advantage of these masterfully absurd questions,
and to a point where there was none in the question itself. Almost all
absurd or self obvious question was not reached the obvious simple answer
but strategically used to expound on an idea and attack the media for their
buffoonery.
Results
Here 35 questions, 33 of which have no journalistic merit, indicating a
chance of 5.7% if you are in a press conference, it is an interesting
question, legitimate. In total, there were 3 decent questions and 3
questions and a half, so if you really stretched, about 12.9% of the
questions are not absurd. How does that compare to the general public?
Fortunately, we have only the data necessary for such an experience. We can
look at 131 Roosh questions responded to the public last year. Anyone with
Internet access who had a question could do it, and they responded with a
series of video chats on Youtube. Without examining all the questions, I
took a sample of 5 for each subject. Here are the results followed by the
number of questions that I felt were good & # 8221; or universal appeal to
a general audience.
Lifestyle / Health: 5/5. All were interesting questions. Example: What
skills do you have that 18-30 should develop? Will things change after 30?
American politics: 2/5. There was a lot What would you do if given
political power & # 8221 incredible; hypotheticals, which are not very
interesting to me, but maybe something cool for Roosh dreaming night.
Religion / Spirituality: 4/5. Example: How can we prepare for the end /
death?
Game / Travel: 5/5. No surprise here, as this is central Roosh expertise
Area, and there were many curious questions reflected. Example: If you
could live in a city for the next 5 years, what would it be?
Staff: 4/5. I don t want to include this section, that personal issues are
less likely to be of great interest, but surprisingly the results were well
above the journalist's rate of 5.7%. Example: If you do not marry and have
children, how will you spend your remaining years?
Globalism / Politics: 3/5. Most of the questions here were still
interesting. Example: Why do you care what happens to Western civilization?
Patriarchy / Tradition: 5/5. Many excellent questions reflected here.
Example: Did you conclude this is not the nation, but urban against rural
ideals?
Conclusion
Total random sample from Roosh questions: 28/35 good, relevant, interesting
questions, or a ratio of 80%. Compared rate professional journalists 5.7%.
In other words, 14 press conferences, journalists could ask so many good
questions as a group of strangers.
What set of questions would you rather responded Roosh: full list of media
questions, bold, or five examples of the above questions, I draw the
general public? What paint a picture of Roosh give interesting ideas worthy
of discussion or stimulate your thinking? Which have wider implications for
society, or that may affect your life? Personally, I & # 8217, to make the
matter worse public list of 131 of the best journalists (Why have you
canceled jogging).
The media itself has proved totally useless. Take your news from other
sources, and consider looking abroad for a point of view of foreign media.
Do not trust dishonest traditional media or publications clickbait as
BuzzFeed. Their power is in decline. The average age of a new spectator Fox
is 68 and no new public program even comes close to the size of The Talking
Dead audience where people gossip about the episode of the zombie series
The Walking Dead aired just before the hour.
The irony is that if sites like CNN Infowars can dwarf in audience size,
the mainstream media still has enormous influence and power. Indeed, the
institution of the press is important and valuable, and it takes more than
a few years of mismanagement to destroy completely. If journalism schools
continue to teach the same garbage that created the current mess media, and
the average person off the street to continue to do their jobs better to
ask and answer questions, one has to wonder how long their power will
continue.
Fill the void
The continued growth of ROK is proof that crowdsourcing media fill the gap
caused by the press. As major institutions have abandoned the values of
Western civilization built over the centuries by patriarchy, moral codes
and religion, we are seeing a backlash directly people who see the decline
of our society, our families and our culture. We do not will go back
quietly into the night.
(My personal new sources include: CS Monitor Blog Steve Lendman Justin D
Martin, Vineyard Saker, nonintervention, it can t happen, Zerohedge,
Infowars and various international publications.)
Read more: How to Raise human beings to violence Fake Headlines
No comments:
Post a Comment