The popular image is that of survivalists preppers right Flyover Country &
# 8221 ;; essentially the most hardcore fraction of what Comrade Obama,
bless his heart, described as follows:
It not surprising, then, they are bitter, they cling to guns or religion or
antipathy to people who aren t like them or sense or anti-immigrant
anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Therefore, it may be a surprise that the oligarch class has its share of
survivalists, an upward trend dramatically. New Zealand is a very popular
place lately. Perhaps some are motivated by security concerns vague,
non-specific (just in case), or if you want extremely durable houses of
holidays, but it seems more than that. An article from February Daily Mail
described it:
Attracted by a first world country remote that has the potential to be
independent and is on the list only one nuclear targets, the super rich
Silicon Valley and Wall Street kings buy vast tracts of its land & # 8212;
in anticipation of the day when they need to live there. [& # 8230;]
What exactly will the disaster be unclear, but the possibilities include a
devastating asteroid impact, giant earthquake, nuclear war, civil war, a
pandemic, the zombie invasion and the Second Coming.
Tellingly, the geeks of Silicon Valley seem to be more worried that it will
be a struggle between rich and poor in a global economy disrupted by new
technologies & # 8212; with them the main targets.
What do they fear?
Does s on their mind & # 8211; or something else?
I agree with the analysis that the class struggle targeting the oligarchs
could occur if all hell breaks loose. It's much more likely that the
asteroid (probably won bunkers t help), earthquakes (Mother Nature gives no
warning), pandemics (far more modest shelters sufficient), zombies (?
Seriously), or second Coming (if the judgment is the real deal, they're
going to hell anyway). So we're left with a nuclear war or civil war as the
reasons for spending huge sums on vast fortifications.
The article speculates that people could be angry about new technology
inventions billionaires & # 8212; because it suggests lower, this could
include robotics. However, anti-robots haven demonstrations peace t been
too common lately, and there's just no revolutionary advances on the
horizon (as the actual artificial intelligence) that could suddenly put
millions of jobs. This scenario doesn t explain why Wall Street types buy
hideouts in New Zealand too. Thus the public becoming technologies just
about breaking angry looks pretty unlikely.
Are they afraid of political instability? As the article says more:
Local realtors say that their US customers rarely intend to live in New
Zealand, but justify purchasing such as toxic presidential election and the
wave of mass shootings in America.
During the first ten months of last year, foreign & # 8212; mostly
Australians and Americans & # 8212; bought nearly 1,400 square miles of
land there, more than four times what they bought in the same period last
year.
Indeed, 2016 was the most turbulent year since the agitation design of the
1960s; seemingly interesting things were in progress. Now here's some more
food for thought:
All this panic among the super-rich raises an obvious question: what do
they know that the rest of us do not?
Admittedly, the preparation of the Apocalypse was a multi-billion dollar
for many years.
The polls showed about 22 percent of Americans believe that the world will
be in their lives' end. " Many straight people were convinced that Barack
Obama would start a civil war by trying to seize the weapons of citizens.
Now there is the unpredictable Donald Trump to disturb their dreams. More
than 13,000 Americans registered to buy a house in New Zealand & # 8212; 17
times the usual rate & # 8212; the week after he was elected president.
That's a very interesting statistical anomaly! Some celebrities lefty
promise to move to Canada if Trump was elected, but still won t leave, even
if they could just drive there in a moving truck. Unlike them, these guys
and # 8212; apparently more than twelve thousand beyond the usual number of
candidates & # 8212; actually got serious about taking the plunge of the
following week. Have they got an exceptionally powerful case of the jitters
after the election, or could there be something more & # 8212; maybe even
inside information & # 8212; forcing them to seek a hideout in a remote
part of the world?
Are they afraid President Trump could push the button? That is quite
unlikely. He wants to continue friendly relations with Russia, the United
States the most credible potential nuclear threat. It was Hillary who
antagonize the Russians. The losers are still with the malarkey that Putin
allegedly hacked the election & # 8221;. (On that note, if it is possible
to hack an election, why aren t they require a return to paper ballots
before 2020?) What about other potentially hostile nuclear powers? China
wouldn t go to war on a rate increase; In addition, they jump to too many
Walmarts. North Korea's arsenal and delivery capabilities are still lower
than what the US had in 1945.
Maybe they're more concerned that Donald himself. The groundswell that was
elected it & # 8212; even despite the Republican bosses trying to cripple
their own candidate in mind every step of the way & # 8212; was conducted
by the same people who call globalist oligarchs on their manipulations. The
rulers abruptly they saw're not as powerful as they alleged, and they're
panicking about what it portends perhaps. Probably the plutocratic preppers
opportunities are reflected. I can see why that scares the snot of them.
A friendly word to the wise
Public Relations for Louis XVI are downhill until things finally came to a
head
The old monarchs & # 8212; even tyrants and # 8212, often acted toward what
they considered the best long-term interests of their country. The Robber
Barons of the golden age were notoriously cheap, but definitely realized
where their wealth comes and had moments of civic spirit. Today aristocrats
are often globalists little loyalty to their country, acting in the best
short-term interests of the next quarterly financial statements.
Every day, more people are waking up to the fact that this is a problem. If
unchecked, today the path will ultimately lead to international feudalism
characterized by third world conditions across the planet, vast extremes of
wealth and the destruction of nationalities and unique cultures. Over time,
it will become increasingly obvious and unpopular.
Peace is good, so we s keep things peaceful. Rather than buying dens where
their supplies will eventually fail if things end badly, I have a better
idea for the oligarchs who have nightmares involving torches and
pitchforks. They can begin to repair their image. Their actions have
created public relations problems.
Sam Francis wrote an article on managerial elites who sell their people. It
is quite large, and I've given my opinion on the matter. The short version
is that the oligarch class is happy to send the public about the Primrose
path. Really, that's not a very good way to win the admiration and respect.
Maybe time for them to come back to do things like that. It is a win-win
for everyone.
As Pat Buchanan said:
Undeniably, Americans cherish their economic freedom and respect for the
men who have helped make America great inventors like Alexander Graham Bell
and Thomas Edison and industrialists such as Henry Ford.
But they do not revere the men who make millions and billions in major
casinos of capitalism. They do not admire George Soros to win his wager
billion shorting the pound.
If their actions are unpopular if they fear a public uprising, then they
must realize that they're doing something wrong. If they want to mend those
who have enriched American consumers should start to show some loyalty.
They should stop bringing in H1-B workers to reduce salaries, sending Third
World sweatshop factories, encourage immigration of population replacement,
etc .. Another sign of good faith would be to stop signs and stop promoting
virtue and fund crazy leftist causes.
There may be a lot to ask, but it would be in their interest to begin to
act with caution, while they still have a chance.
Read more: Is genocide on the agenda Elite?
No comments:
Post a Comment