According to official university, the Manu Law Code is a legal document
produced around the second or third century BC in India. It was created
amid discord between castes, mostly used for the first two castes in the
order of four Hindu castes would keep cooperating with a benefit to the
Brahmin & # 8212; clerics, priests, teachers & # 8212; the Kshatriya & #
8212; warriors, administrators, rights & # 8212; in an orderly caste
particular civilization.
If we follow such a historicist, everything-comes-to - human whims view,
the Manu Law Code can not be relevant for cheesy Sanskrit scholars who made
a niche in the academic market and perhaps lawyers who seeking an exotic
literature in their field. For another, it's just a bunch of culturally
foreign words, dusty and uninteresting. You better follow what happens
during the year, from traditional sources approved establishment.
Of course, my approach here is quite different, otherwise I would not have
written this piece. Ancient India is one of the oldest known civilized
societies and has a religion may be closer to the "source" of all those
later, we are most familiar with. Hinduism, far from being limited to
stories of children like mythology, superstition, or New Age bullshit
euphoric, this rich concepts such as Dharma & # 8212; to which I have
dedicated a room ROK & # 8212; this analogy bear with those later, as the
Greek Dike or the cosmos, or the Jewish tsedek (loosely, "justice").
This is what the law of Manu Code stems from: traditional, cross society
with spiritual liveliness and perhaps more intellectual who does not belong
to us, that was the test of time, and has a pretty cool spot view over from
the floating fashion today. Accurate and wide, the Code covers a wide range
of areas with minimal jargon and, as you will see, has little if anything
in common with the strange tribes that attracted so disproportionate
matriarchy or Exotic-looking anthropologists. I think it can be compared to
the Jewish mitzvot ( "commandments"), in that most of these can not be
applied more in modern societies, but remains an important source of
reference and inspiration.
1. initiation rites count
After a brief account of the creation of the world and man, the code begins
by setting out the roots of the law in general and the fight against the
consecration rites. These themes go together, as only a well launched & #
8212 person; as well as other conditions and # 8212; seems qualified to
understand and say what needs to be. Yet they also reach well beyond the
world of lawyers: in a traditional society, everyone had rites of passage
to go through depending on its specific identity.
It was noted here that a company misses initiation rites produces immature
people, incomplete, frail and jaded. Many men of the 60s and the 70s are
cowards and conformists who kept enthralled by cultural leftism. We
millenials, never had the security, wealth and access to sex they enjoyed,
yet we can be better than we have at least our own initiation rites. Take
the red pill is as a practice game like any other. These "rituals" of ours
make us Abler, stronger, more in touch with the "worrying" but actually
very important for wimps gray head. As Manu Code makes clear, those who
were able to hold the rite are Actualized by it, so that some
are "twice-born. "
2. Purity is also important
A recurring theme in the right code is purity. Before performing a ritual
or formal prayer, take an ablution and a clear mind of random thoughts and
negative emotions. Eating inappropriate food, conspiracy or outcasts is
considered defilement. When a "sin", it must undergo a penance, not because
he was forced to do, but to get "clean" for defilement.
We were told most taboos were passed "oppression" and replaced BOUND TO.
The Victoria taboo on sex would be a society "lower" in relation to our
a "emancipated." Thus, the only acceptable purity would Medical & # 8212;
wash hands before eating & # 8212; like everything else is ultimately
grounded.
Ironically, the leftist establishment has become incredibly puritan in its
own right: believe in gender equality, progress, rape culture, global
warming and other idols; isms and prevent -phobias; buy fair trade; eat
organic ... Behind their hipsterism veneer, bourgeois bohemians are
incredibly prudish and obsessed with purity, especially ideologically. For
us it puritanism resembles a large matrix, a subframe where standards and
judgments away from reality and we take instill fears and bad judgment
criteria.
When the leftist "Puritan" sees sacrilege ( "WHAT WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMIC?
OMFG THIS IS SEXIST CISHET MANSPLAINING SEXISM!"), We see consciousness.
This does not mean worrying about the purity is always bad. The question is
whether this or that can be considered just as pure or not, and if we are
in contact with a proper sense of cleanliness inside ourselves.
Girls who went to ugly and get their holes rammed massive amounts of Dick
have the right to repulsion. Similarly, many of them we call scum ( "scum")
in French are dirty in various directions and # 8212; they smoke weed, are
drug addicts, seem unable to talk without shouting or scorching the French
language through an ugly, repulsive accent; they treat illegal transactions
involving the sale of unhealthy products, defraud customers, rob, they act
as parasites and are proud, they often feel bad emotions against almost
everything, and even the lack of basic hygiene. Do considering these dirty
and contaminated people make us "bigot"?
Of course, the purity mentioned in the Code is authentic in the sense that
it is not the virtue of signs or showing signs of purity while there would
be "unclean" or dirty inside. A true Brahmin is not a Pharisee, and nobody
else should be.
3. Too much hypocrisy is harmful and should be avoided
The Bible devotes at least two chapters (Matthew 6-7) to expose those who
turn their virtuous acts in a public demonstration action and values made
without evidence. People must seek the good for himself, not for social
rewards or participate in a game Just as the Bible & # 8212. in fact, a
little less, perhaps because the hypocrisy was less common in ancient India
in the first century Judea & # 8212; Manu law condemns social dishonesty:
A man who always displays the banner of justice and yet he is greedy and
deceitful, deceiving the world, which is given to violence, and that
everyone should be seduced considered one who observes the "cat-Wish."
Double-born who walks with downcast eyes, but is cruel, given his own ends,
wrong, and being falsely moralistic, is a man who observes the 'heron
vow "... After committing a sin [a] must never make a penitential
observation on the grounds that [a] made a meritorious act, covering his
sin with his respect and deceiving women and Shudra. (4.195 to 8)
If being polite to people you hate is hypocrisy, so be it. Concealing one's
feelings and often necessary in social thought, although one could say that
this is required is a sign of degeneration. However, being engaged in
a 'interests over those of others and pretending to be generous, as the
socialists are generally should be considered unacceptable and clearly
condemned. Undoubtedly, the massive hypocrisy currently carries a powerful
significant relationship with the current state of the West.
4. Vocations matter, and they can not be reduced to a flat graphic
Hindu society, like other Indo-European companies to the Middle Ages Europa
is organized on the superimposed castes. The Brahmin has the highest
authority under their "birthright" and higher learning, Kshatriyas are
those who put their lives on the battlefield and those capable of political
power on the Vaisya these are free men who deal in trade, agriculture and
skills, and the Shudra mostly serve the other three castes.
Individually, these castes are justified by the purpose or dharma of each
individual: it is, for example, a Vaisya or Kshatriya from the start and
could not change his caste without turning into another person. Some
vocations are higher than others and should be recognized as such.
Most ROK readers should find the idea of intuitive calling. Women have
specific goals for their sex and should not try to steal or destroy manly
places. However, the caste hierarchy and leveling on vocations may seem
foreign to American readers: the US was founded on the idea that neither
centralized church or nobility must exist. Do not the founding fathers
reject the caste system from the start? Indeed, & # 8212; but I am neither
American nor conservative enough to put them on the same footing as the
sacred texts.
5. Hierarchy itself is not a problem, a bad hierarchy
A hierarchy where manly men have authority over women women working. Each
has a specific role in nature and can achieve its own objectives with the
help of the other. Reversed the matriarchal hierarchy where women govern on
the other hand, is unsatisfactory: women look like men caricatures being
authoritarian, let their defects, such as conformity and trend-express
groupthink, and turn men into slaves or pleasure-driven short term. Neither
party would be able to achieve its best trends, such as love and care for
women, or meet challenges for men.
Similarly, the caste hierarchy of four is a good or fair. The following
company and having appropriate individuals at each level would be more
harmonious, even in poverty. When the regular order was messed up, so does
the whole society: Kshatriya claiming spiritual authority begins
subordinated to political interests, like the Protestant princes of Europe
were in the sixteenth century; Vaishya pretending to finish all marketing,
turning politics into a market where lobbyists and sellouts abound. "lower"
castes can not help but bring them essential ethos with them no matter
where they go or what they claim to be.
The lesson here might be that modernity was mostly synonymous time
a "Vaishya-ization" of society: universities have turned into an academic
niche market, politics have become a market as well, and the process were
compounded by women trying to play men & # 8212; bourgeois women especially
above claiming political power. Each "lower" caste denythe "higher" than
their rights and prerogatives were poorest in the world.
As for me, I have no problem with the idea that some, even men should not
have the right to financial independence: libertarianism can work well for
men of Mensa, but people need 70 IQ clearly paternalistic management not to
drown in their own stupidity.
"Even a Shudra able wealth should not accumulate because when a Shudra
becomes rich, he harasses Brahmin. "(10.129) Some rich fund seditious
persons, division of groups such as BLM, some who enjoy a small act of
authority like little heads-triggering power, some women beta orbiters and
power management ... a hierarchy is one with equal opportunities or
opportunities for promotion, but where everyone can achieve its rightful
place.
Conclusion
Alt-right blogger Lawrence Murray contrast Buddhism, which has a cultural
status and association with the western upper classes, with a "intensely
abroad Hinduism. "Practicing yoga, reciting a few mantras and mingling with
other bourgeois bohemian sipping fair trade green tea seems indeed easier
than justice as frankly non-modern order.
Modernity in general and the so-called American dream especially Entertain
a deep trend of anti-traditional thinking, anti-dharmic that promotes an
abstract and formally autonomous individual capable of doing it is he
wants. "Gender" or denial of sex in the name of a selected or psychological
sex, but the latest product of the trend.
If you could choose between a society in which Hillary Clinton had won the
election and a society with castes and sacred fires, would you have the
courage to choose the second option & # 8212, knowing that women are women,
but also you are, say, a Vaishya and therefore not entitled to (for
example) give a scientific opinion on what the Bible says?
Whatever your answer, remember that modern ethical theories come and go
with the zeitgeist, while dharmic cultures still exist side alongside
modern technology. I could bet anything in a hundred years the Manu Law
Code will always be studied while the name of Anita Sarkeesian be forgotten.
Read more: dysfunction of modern society is proof that cultural
Marxism "Works"
No comments:
Post a Comment