From the beginning, there was a semi-formal social contract between the
sexes who worked for the good of men, women and children in particular.
This existence is because men and women are different. These differences
aren t social constructions; they re basic biology. In a healthy society,
these differences complement each other.
Feminists generally deny this. They start from the belief that everyone is
supposed to be the same, use the privilege of rhetoric to press advantages.
In doing so, they've disrupted the social contract and ease the task of
everyone. Let's examine some details.
Men and women should respect each other
In the past, the guys have learned to treat all women with respect. As I
heard, you tip your hat to the same city Hooker & # 8221. In return, the
women met the back. The men were courteous; women are very feminine. After
the mid-1960s, men were always supposed to be courteous, but women can do
what they want. While most women still have pleasant personalities, many
act in a way that would have been considered before verging on madness.
Why this used to work: Mutual respect is great while it lasted, making the
happy and harmonious society.
Why stopped working: Feminists want an unhappy society and disharmony, told
us the enemy and began to lie about us. We're expected to maintain market
share (although paradoxically give too much respect can lead to guys not to
be taken seriously). Meanwhile, women infected with the virus of the
mind-feminism believe they allowed to act as wicked they want. (It does not
help that hordes of hungry guys allowed them to think they can get away
with anything and still be desired.) This is an important reason why the
social environment is zero. However, the individual beauty is fleeting, and
sexual market is overdue for a correction.
What can we do: give social respect Default merit. Do not hesitate to call
those who act snotty. Calmly explain that rudeness without provocation is
very unattractive for any self-respecting. If all the men refused to
tolerate the intolerable, attitudes begin to change.
Men and women don t fight each other
This is a very difficult and ugly subject. Initiate the force is wrong, no
matter who does it. Those who ignore it should be prepared to accept the
consequences of their actions.
Violence between men & # 8212; and even fist fights duels & # 8212; was
once tolerated by law. That now seems a little wild, like animals that are
fighting for the pack hierarchy. (Today, the delivery of bad attitude
adjustments necessary, the fight against the letter for your honor, or even
self-defense could get you a criminal record Dispute settlement by lawyers
is far from perfect, but everything. another story.) However, even in these
toughest periods, hitting women was considered a vile act. Offenders are
subject to flee, Charivari (essentially a mocking crowd), or even mob
justice. The law has also taken steps, and whipping posts were once
considered.
Why this habit of working: Civilized men don t use their natural strength
advantage to dominate their wives and girlfriends. Women don & # 8217
Civilized, t take advantage of this prohibition to strike us with impunity.
Men had to exercise restraint, and wives in their way. Both parties acting
civilized benefited everyone. In addition, women in the early days could be
quite bright, but we provoking the limits of our patience was abnormal. It
wasn t ladylike, and reputation mattered. In addition, chronic & # 8221
rumbles; got their own sanctions, such as ducking stool.
Why stopped working: male violence against women is still strongly
discouraged (although, paradoxically, it is not exactly a turn-off for some
women). However, violence by women against men is considered much more
acceptable. TV or in a movie, it's terrible when a man hits a woman, but a
woman kicking a man in the nuts is described as funny. Too you-go-girlism
done a great disservice. Think Antifag member who undertook to take 100
scalps Nazis & # 8221; but when she tried to smother a guy, she bridged in
two seconds.
In any event, it is a myth that women are never violent. Some of them even
think he's pretty cute admit online. An article Jezebel have you ever
fought a boyfriend? Because, uh, we said:
A study of relationships who engage in non-reciprocal violence, a whopping
70% are committed by women. So basically this means that girls beat their
husbands and BFs and dudes aren t fight back. Amy Winehouse busting open a
box of whupass her husband last week, we decided to conduct an informal
survey to see who Jezebels s Gotten violent with their men. After reviewing
the answers, let s just say that of wise never to fuck with us.
follow four specific stories. Let's just say that with wise never to pick
fights with people who are stronger than you. In any case, contrary to the
stereotype, apparently many men are showing incredible restraint.
What can be done: I had two girlfriends who hit me. I never retaliated, and
even shook my fist. Finally, I threw them, but to other behaviors sub-par.
Today I have less tolerance. If a girlfriend hits you, I recommend a
warning, at most; after that, it's the door. Without going into a long
legal discussion, you re always & # 8221 evil, and n t is important that
you defend legitimately. You might think (as I once did) that it doesn t
matter because it hits like a girl, but's still a level intolerable
disrespect. It even better for bail before things as toxic. Who wants to
deal with a bunny boiler anyway?
Men should be men and women should be women
I swear I was not t the one who recommended it.
Blurring the distinctions between the sexes was one of the first cultural
Marxism goals. Today it has succeeded beyond comrade Marcuse's wildest
dreams. However, everything that's against nature. It is another reason why
today's social environment is zero.
Why this habit of working: heterosexual men are wired to desire feminine
features, and straight women like masculine guys. It doesn t take an
evolutionary biologist to understand why. This includes both the appearance
and behavior.
Why stopped working: Since the mid-1950s, the second wave of feminism began
bashing masculine traits, and they're still with this toxic masculinity
nonsense. By their rhetoric, they convinced a lot of guys that women don t
like masculinity; take a wild guess how that worked out for the guys who
have believed it!
Feminists also duped millions into believing that femininity was under
them. The way they said it, it & # 8221 patriarchal; somehow the facts are
these natural and endearing attributes. However, we don t like women,
unladylike a little more feminine than women like wimpy guy.
Earlier I mentioned the women who blow you off if you show too much
respect, and those who go for violent guy. One could chalk these paradoxes
to irrationality, the self esteem issues, problems Dad, confused or
obnoxious behavior with confidence. Yet surely this is compounded by the
shortage of decent guy not afraid to act like real men.
What can be done: On our side, men should ignore feminists when they tell
us that male traits are bad. One of the best things that has Manosphere is
to show how absurd is and prevent men from more sabotaging their love life.
There are also ways we can encourage femininity too. For example, once I
spoke of a pretty girl getting a piercing across the bridge of his nose. I
might be unfortunate, but I m capable of occasional good action.
Conclusion
Hit the SJWs where it hurts, their credibility
Feminists want to keep all the privileges that the chivalrous treatment
given them. Meanwhile, in the name of equality (they had the law by the
early 1960s), they continue to push for preferential treatment. Could it be
time to bring the ducking stool?
Learn more: 8 factors that are destroying healthy relationships between men
and women
No comments:
Post a Comment