May 29, 2017, a brief quarrel Twitter happened between Ukraine and Russia.
Both official accounts and unofficial powers skirmished with punchlines
light and images.
The Ukrainian has released first, apparently in response to the remark by
Vladimir Poutine end the same day. Meeting with French banker boy escort
President Emmanuel Macron in Versailles, the historic residence of the
kings of France, M. Poutine was confronted with an attempt to show some
rhetorical ability. Macron mixed indeed a reference to French history and a
grin to the past European knights, before saying that France and Russia had
had a relationship for three centuries, "since Peter the Great. "
Putin, more comfortable among the majestic surroundings, playfully replied
that relations between the two countries were much older and deeper, as
they began with the princess of the eleventh century Anne of Kiev or Anna
Rus & # 8212; the wording of the princess, "and queen, the name became
controversial.
Within hours, the official Twitter account of Ukraine started the quarrel
with the next image, which claims to "remember a sequence of events," but
more like a troll comparison:
When @Russia said Anne of Kiev has established Russia-France relations,
recall the sequence of events pic.twitter.com/nBKhQdyKql
- Ukraine / Україна (@Ukraine) May 30, 2017
And then it started.
Two interpretations of Russian history (and Ukrainian)
Beyond the trolling, baiting, and print management, two issues are at stake
here:
When Russia started? Does Russia appears with the principality of Kievan
Rus', which came with the city, or later? Does Russia begins in a place
that will eventually become independent, or only when the capital was
transferred to Moscow, Kiev leaving therefore belong to a separate nation?
Ann was the Russian princess, Ukrainian, or both, provided that the
question makes sense?
What Ukraine communicators suggest here is a version of history in which
Ukraine is essentially a nation clearly identified to a specific territory
centered around Kiev. Those who hold this view point out how the Ukrainian
language differs from the Russian contemporary Russia and current trace a
story that took place mostly around Moscow.
Moreover, Russia focuses on its own continuity of the principality of
Kievan Rus' and how to place calls on Ukraine today is bound to her by a
common history. For at least a century, Ukraine has entertained a
nationalist and separatist overview while Russia, following its long
history of tsarist annexations and tumultuous, considers himself a fateful
empire whose name comes from Russia Kievan.
What does the story?
Not surprisingly, the new false media commented the meeting with the
employee Rothschild Macron look good. HuffPo Macron said "reminded" the
same version of the story is Putin polemic and short-sighted, Le Monde
reflects on the "ego" of Putin assumed and insists that the current
Ukrainian government & # 8212; which was violently set up by well-trained,
rioters & # 8212 well-funded, had been "freely elected" while Numerama
ignores that Ukraine, not Russia, started the quarrel Internet and kept
fanning the flames. All these outlets pointedly avoided the historical
question of when Russia was born, either through lack of knowledge or
interest, or that they can maintain their objectivity veneer.
The principality of Kievan Rus' was founded in the ninth century by the
Vikings called the Varangians. First small principality was able to develop
and become the guardian of a trade route expansion from Scandinavia to the
Byzantine Empire through the efforts of its leaders, the Rurik dynasty. At
its peak, in 1054, ruled Kievan Rus territory now divided between Ukraine,
Belarus, Lithuania and Russia:
The principality Kievan Rus 1054-1132.
Don t jealous @Ukraine. In 1051 Kiev was the capital of the United #Rus
which included the modern territories, and. pic.twitter.com/TMX5KiGAPl
- MFA Russia (@mfa_russia) May 30, 2017
Between 1024 and 1032, Rurik King Yaroslav "the Wise" gave birth to a
daughter, Anna Yaroslavna. According to custom, the family name derived
from the name of his father. His signature, recorded on a diploma, was
written in the early Cyrillic alphabet, but with a particular writing style
that recalls the alphabet Futhark:
ANA REGINA
In 1051, Anna went to the distant kingdom of France to marry King Henri Ier
According to Wikipedia, it would be to sign documents in Old Slavonic, as
Ана Ръина ( "Anna Regina"). The French call her Anne.
Back to the history of Kievan Rus, the principality was constantly face
external threats, as a warlike people of Turko-Mongol origin were coveted
control of trade routes and internal threats of bloody wars of succession
between the Rurik princes. One of them, Alexandre Nevski (1220-1263),
managed to unite Rus again, at the price of becoming a vassal of the Mongol
invaders.
Meanwhile, the subjects began to colonize Kievan Moskovia a cold place even
more peaceful resisted. During the 12th century, a fortress was built
there: he would eventually designated as the Kremlin.
The key moment came when Prince Daniel Aleksandrovich (1261-1303, son and
heir of Nevsky) transferred power from Kiev to Moscow. The latter gained
political influence and, in 1299, the metropolitan bishop of Kiev would
move too close to Moscow.
Thus, there is a clear continuity between the principality and Kievan Rus
tsarist state that formed near Moscow. The relationship also differs when
considering how the first Tsar Ivan III Vasilyevich & # 8212; who was also
a Rurik & # 8212; finally managed to kick out the Mongols and, by marrying
the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, established in Moscow the "Third
Rome."
However, continuity described here is a little weaving. From a purely
geographical and linguistic point of view, one can perceive rather a
discontinuity: the city of Kiev and its surroundings were on the outer
circle of Moscow, and were quite isolated children in the country to draw
from their own dialect Old Slavonic .
The region was divided between Poland and Lithuania to the north and the
Turks and Mongols for centuries. Only later was it taken by Russia and then
by Catholics Cossack Ruthenia, which during the 16th and 17th centuries
created the Sloboda Ukraine, literally free border districts of taxes
( "Sloboda" which means "free "and" Ukraine "," on the March "). Tsarina
Catherine the Great took over the area in the mid 18th century.
Only in the 19th century that the word "Ukraine" is back. Intellectuals
picked classism virulent Karl Marx meets their objectives and # 8212; they
made their demagogy among the peasants instead of workers & # 8212; and
worked on the politics and culture to create a separatist nationalist
sentiment "Ukrainian".
Neocons behind the current Ukraine
Must we conclude that Russia is entitled to claim the inheritance of Anna
Yaroslavna, and therefore, perhaps, from Kiev? Things are not so simple.
The answer depends on an interpretation of history and what is right.
If we perceive the historical continuity as the most important aspect, and
I stressed this aspect by mentioning heredity Rurik founder Rus Tsar Ivan
III and Queen Anne belonged to the family that spread to once the
principality of Kievan Rus' and centered on Moscow tsardom. This is a
historical fact that until now has not been denied by traditional outlets.
However, where the focus of the United Nations, or even more, regionalist
pulses on the weight of the long history, Kiev can be considered Ukraine in
the sense that it would not be Russian.
In any case, I find anachronistic how today's Ukraine pretends to
appropriate Princess Anna in a way that excludes the current of his
inheritance Russia, as the very Ukrainian nation simply does not exist at
this time & # 8212; and we must remember that Anna Yaroslavna has been
mainly identified with the line, it belonged to, rather than a particular
place. "Ann Kiev, Ukraine" seems essentially an artificial creation
promoted to support a masked identity.
As for the question of when Russia started & # 8212; He started with King
Varangian Rurik, or with his distant descendants in Moscow? It is difficult
to give a simple answer. The same is true regarding the issue of Ukrainian
law to be independent of Russia. After all, the founders of the United
States from England, and that does not give the United States a special
right over England. For a layman, these issues are too distant and complex.
Which is exactly why the false news media can turn their story: they have
the "experts", you know, who know the details you do not slice and pounded
whatever version is convenient for the powerful interests of today ' hui.
No matter what Ukraine has the right, regardless of the honor of Ukrainian
identity, what we know for sure is that the current Ukrainian government is
little more than a globalist puppet. President-elect Victor Ianukovich, who
had already faced a lot of pressure, as well as well supported the Orange
Revolution, even before his election, was brutally ousted after announcing
his intention to strengthen ties with Russia. The right to
self-determination recognized that when those who are supposed to have
taken a holistic program? When Ianukovich was chased, he was replaced by
Peter Porochenko, the sellouts working in tandem with globalists and NATO.
Of course, none of this was mentioned by the Ukrainian communicators. When
the Russian official Twitter account responded evoking the city of Veliky
Novgorod, which was part of Kievan Rus in the 11th century, Ukraine
responded with an animated image of the Simpsons accused Russia of
being "really " The soviet union. Reminder (((that))) created the Simpsons,
and notice how hawkish rhetoric and cuckservative Muh USSR sounds ...
You really don t change, do you think? pic.twitter.com/HDfS9A8jWZ
- Ukraine / Україна (@Ukraine) May 30, 2017
Ukraine then jumped from the 11th century to the 20th by invoking
the "international law":
Kyivan Rus stretched to modern areas too. Do not give the "nation"
Trinitarian pls nonsense and to comply with the law int
pic.twitter.com/DVO9NToZiP
- Ukraine / Україна (@Ukraine) May 30, 2017
Wait a minute. The present day Ukraine uses a stylized version of the Rurik
coat of arms as his own and started this troll rivalry by a rather
controversial comparison between Kiev and Moscow in the 11th century. Why,
then, Ukraine communicators jumping from the 11th century to the 20th? What
they did is a blatant anachronism & # 8212; Orthodox cathedrals of Kiev
have no relation to an abstract invention of the 20th century. Fortunately,
they posted some "funny" moving images along and some idiots still compare
Kiev and Moscow in the 11th century as if these places were so irrelevant
to what is right "now. "
Russian points of sale such as RT or Sputnik News is, of course, less than
perfect. Both have repeatedly supported the "refugee" invasion of Europe
under the pretext of realizing, as the mainstream fake news did and often
confusing messages Sputnik "new" Aliens. Yet overall, the Russian
communications do not use the tips above and seems more honest than the
useful idiots of Globalist.
This does not mind Russia recover its former empire in the far east of
Europe. But I do not really mind how globalists use masks and aliases for
countless maintain their false narrative. Russia does not oppress or kill
us, no matter the extent of their possible links with Julian Assange & #
8212; which has the reputation of not having ever falsified a document. The
globalists are doing.
Read more: Why the crisis in Ukraine is a red pill blue pill Clash Vs
Superpower
No comments:
Post a Comment