The Canadian province of Ontario, which comprises approximately 40% of
Canada's population, and includes the capital Ottawa and Toronto, zero
SlutWalk and feminism, passed a law encouraging children as young as age 5
years become transvestites.
A Brave Slutwalk Message: I don t know it was never in question
Support for children, youth and families Act, 2017 (Bill 89) was passed in
June of the current year and reform of laws existing childcare codified in
the old childhood family Act, 1990 (the last sane period in the west). The
new law is complete, with 352 sections. Rewriting a child protection law is
a big business, and this law was made with specific nefarious intentions.
The ministry administers the help of children, foster care and adoption
services for the millions of children who live in Ontario. It helps
children who are abandoned or considered at risk and in need of public
support because of a lack of adequate parental care by birth parents or
other legal guardians.
Two examples would be a child whose parents die without a name or a sponsor
child of a single mother who was arrested and sent to prison. In 2016,
Ontario has provided social services to more than 113,000 families with
children (about 5% of the 2,285,450 families with children in the census of
2011). The department provides care to children up to age 16. Let a look at
what the new law means.
1. Increase the child's age from 16 to 18
The age of protection is raised from 16 to 18 Under the new law. This is
the most reasonable available. Public schools usually ends around 18 years,
and it is difficult to be autonomous in modern society before this age,
even if our ancestors were starting families and running businesses in
adolescence. However, it should be noted that 16-18 years are when many
kids go through puberty and become sexually active in some form. This
provision is key when combined with transsexual provisions described below.
2. More racism against whites
The government will collect information about children Racial it helps.
While the race is a factor that private companies and individuals are often
forbidden to discuss or even the collection, the government will be
required to collect racial data and to analyze and help people on the basis
of race. The former government was already required to provide services to
all children, whatever their race, so this component has no other purpose
than whites more demonize, particularly straight white men.
3. The elimination of religion as an investment factor
The religious background of the child has traditionally been considered in
the development of an assistance plan. A young Catholic girl whose parents
were killed in an automobile accident would likely be referred to a
Catholic adoption service run by a local monastery, who tried to find
parents who would continue raising the child with morality and values
similar to those of his parents. A Jewish boy whose mother was arrested for
assaulting a stranger would probably be sent to someone in the Jewish
community so it can continue to be raised in this culture.
But under the new law, the child's religion is no longer a factor in making
decisions for placement or care. And religious protections that
specifically protected the right of parents to direct the child's education
and religious education are gone. In its place, the ministry must now
consider the child s & # 8230;
& # 8230; race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin,
citizenship, diversity, family, disability, religion, sex, sexual
orientation, gender identity and sexual expression.
The courts, which were required to determine the child's religious faith as
soon as possible, will not determine the child's faith at all. Thus, the
child of faith and beliefs are not important, but his race, diversity of
family (whatever that is), sexual orientation, gender and flavor of the
day, must be taken into account help. I got it.
Will they exist after this law?
Religious groups have warned that if the belief word appears in the new
legislation, ask a child if it has a different creed is to determine what
religion he was raised in the language in legal documents is strictly
interpreted (hence why. sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender
expression and diversity of the family, that all mean essentially the same
thing, are explicitly included in the text, but religion or faith is not
ordered).
4. The importance of such feelings or transsexual
Instead of religion, we have several gender identity feelings that must be
considered when helping the child. Since these are codified into law, this
means that social workers need to discuss sexual issues with children to
determine their placement on the 72 kinds of spectrum, or if they like to
dress like the opposite sex , which would indicate that they are a
potential transsexual and should therefore be raised in a way that
encourages trannyism.
These questions will be posed to children as young as 5, who are not sexual
in any way, other than to have a non-functional penis or vagina, as well as
teens in the newly expanded age range of 16-18, when the hormones are at
their strongest, and young brains are more sensitive. The simple
introduction of gender fluidity of ideas or question the sexual diversity
of a child desires can be enough to trigger young minds to have
non-traditional sexual thoughts, which would be fully strengthened and
encouraged by the government, schools, and the peer group.
5. The government can seize the children of families who n t believe in
gender theory
The danger is not limited to the innocent children of active or accidental
parents are no longer able to care for their children. The new law broadens
the scope of intervention to all Ontario family with children. The old law
was written to require the least disruptive course of action available,
with the removal of a parent loan last resort.
The new law modifies the expression less disruptive action, including the
provision of prevention services, which encourages the Ministry to apply
preventive measures for existing families, who are not considered
disruptive, and can be widely applied .
Dad Canadian losing children
What this means, according to the Ontario Minister of Children and Youth
Services and Minister responsible for the fight against racism Michael
Coteau, is that if a child has some kind of feelings that are not supported
or have actively opposed by s parents (which might mean telling your 13 no,
you're not a pansexual attack helicopter), it could be considered as & #
8230;
& # 8230; a form of abuse when a child identifies a way and a health care
provider says no, you have to do it differently & # 8230; If the abuse, and
if it's in the definition, a child may be removed from the medium and
placed in the protection which the judgment abuse.
Sacrificing the company s most vulnerable to sexual degeneration
Citizen: On behalf of the diversity of the family, you reassigned a new
Brave and his wife Superb
The Minister for Children is responsible for the important task of
protecting the most vulnerable in society & # 8212; children who are left
without viable option for a good caregiver. This essential service is
turned into a political tool to further weaken the religion and beliefs and
develop homosexual transsexual. What is the aim of encouraging more sexual
degeneration? Why Western governments advocate for these types of behaviors
while trying to silence or attack those that promote normal civilized
values, healthy?
Is raising a traditional family may soon be illegal
Men who attempt marriage in the West are already playing a dangerous game,
and that's if they find a young bride conservative, traditional, foreign
and try to raise a family in the same traditional principles and beliefs of
their ancestors. This new Canadian law more stacks the deck against men
trying to have a traditional family life. Increasingly, the solution not
only looks to find a foreign wife, but relocating to a foreign environment.
Even if America is going a few years without a similar law, the mentality
behind it already exists strongly in this country. In Canada, there will
soon be a thought-crime to have a family straight right, and governments
instead force a transsexual in your home to foster family diversity and
gender expression & # 8221;?
(Rebel Canadian media outlet summarizes some of the changes in this law in
a video.)
Read more: A Modern Day Horror story about the origin of the transgender
movement
No comments:
Post a Comment