Countries such as Sweden, France, UK and Germany have accepted many
migrants, particularly non-European men. To some extent that is also the
case in the United States, Canada and Australia. For example, the Swedish
economist Jan Tullberg said that Sweden now has 125,000 men to 100,000
women.
This effect is magnified in younger age cohorts because of the influx of
men unaccompanied Afghan refugee children adults, and the Middle East and
economic migrants from African men who came as a result of coordinated
efforts of globalists like George Soros and NGOs such as Save the Children
International.
Some have also speculated that feminists in positions of leadership or want
to make things worse for Aboriginal men or they want to increase the value
of women in the sex market, making it more competitive society for men
while improving their access to the men. More men imply a better situation
for adult women who are free to choose from both Aboriginal and non-
Aboriginal men and short- and long-term relationships.
The social consequences can be very detrimental since this development not
only leads to instability or even reverse sexual market and the marriage
market, but also higher rates of crime and more men join extreme
nationalist, leftist and groups Islamic (ISIS in particular). Where
positive changes are needed.
More women as a solution
Part of the solution is to stop and reverse immigration, but another aspect
is to make room for more women migrants. My suggestion is to accept more of
the poorest areas of women from Eastern Europe and adjusting the numbers
for the size of the total population of each host.
Countries such as Russia (142 million) and Ukraine (44 million) will not be
exhausted their wives if two million leave for the West. Other poor
countries with large populations such as Brazil (207 million), the
Philippines (104 million) and Indonesia (260 million) could be more options
in this regard. In addition, the real women of refugees from countries
affected by war, such as Yemen could be another group that is authorized to
West entrance, at least in the short term.
If this hypothetical scenario were to become reality, it probably would
have a number of positive effects for social cohesion. When the white
citizens and non-whites out that they have a greater chance of finding a
long-term partner, they will focus more on a stable life instead of joining
pathetic extremist groups who do not good.
In addition, the sexual market will be more balanced, and even indigenous
women may have to adjust and better themselves because of increased
competition from their global sisters. And why a man to live in South
America, Eastern Europe and South Asia in the worst material conditions
when it can live in the West with a more traditional partner?
Practical implementation
This is largely a political task and few politicians will support this
idea, at least initially. Hence it must be put to the agenda of the online
community, which may have contagion effects in real politics.
The first step is to use the clever rhetoric to put the issue on the
agenda. For example, what happened to the old adage that women and children
should come first? The pathos of the public will be affected by pictures of
poor girls and women in Russia, Ukraine, the Philippines, Indonesia, Yemen,
and so on. Then we must highlight some logical arguments behind this idea.
Finally, some parties and politicians will push this agenda.
Conclusion
Migrants more women should flood the West in the coming years, perhaps even
decades, in parallel with the reversal of the flow of male migrants from
non-Western countries. This will have a number of positive effects on the
companies as a more balanced sex market, crime rates, and greater social
cohesion. We all fight for this assumption must become real. The first step
is to put the issue on the agenda.
For William Adams hardware, see its syncretic Policy website.
Read more: How to mass immigration is driven by consumerism and low
fertility woman
No comments:
Post a Comment