Hurricane Irma caught the attention of the world in early September. At the
end of the first week of September, Irma reached its peak intensity with
winds of 185 mph (295 km / h) and a minimum pressure of 914 hPa (27.0 in
Hg). I checked the Wikipedia page and it seems that it is considered the
seventh hurricane landfall most intense in the United States.
As we know, "never let a good crisis waste." This was the sign for
all "climate of amateurs" and "Global Warming" to push their agenda. The
mainstream media is here to help. For example, this article in The
Economist said:
One cause is global warming. The frequency and severity of hurricanes
naturally vary America saw unusually low in the last decade. However, the
global trend behind this is what you expect from climate change.
So at the same time you blame global warming, although there is literally
no evidence, you have the usual double language "It is because of global
warming," while simultaneously "There is no real evidence. " Oh, and we
forgot the scapegoat, or the devil himself, Trump. The Guardian has accused
Trump. No, it did not cause the storms, but it is because of him that there
will be no more death:
But the ruthless assault on the American continent by Harvey and Irma
should force the president to recognize the consequences of his arrogance
and complacency rejecting the research and analysis done by scientists.
The article continues to go. It indicates that climate change is not
responsible for a specific storm or the number of storms, but it reverts
back to say that there are three reasons why climate change for the worse
hurricanes: hot water made harsher storms, a warmer atmosphere makes the
heaviest rain, and higher sea levels make storms more deadly because they
have more water to grow. We must therefore understand that global warming
is bad, and we do everything we can to reduce CO2 emissions, whatever the
cost may be.
Have you heard of "Hurricane Drought"?
new CNS was an interesting article. Its title was "US Major Hurricane
drought ends at 4323 Save Days". It seems that for twelve years, no major
hurricane (category 3 and above) hit the United States. There were nine
minor (class 2 and below) and 2012 SuperStorm (Sandy), which was not
considered a hurricane (post-tropical cyclone). The latest "drought" was
from 1860 to 1869.
"The world is now in an era of historically low meteorological disasters.
This applies to the meteorological phenomena that have historically caused
the most damage. tropical cyclones, floods, tornadoes and drought "Roger
Pielke Jr 2017
I'm a little confused. How can it be that we see fewer hurricanes that
cause less damage, and at the same time that global warming and storms?
Well, NOAA clear (or less clearly in this case):
It is premature to conclude that human activities, in particular emissions
of greenhouse gases that cause global warming, have had a detectable impact
on Atlantic hurricanes and global hurricane activity. However, human
activities may have already caused changes that are not detectable because
of the low magnitude of change or observation limits.
After 200 years of carbon emissions, which are growing in size, there is no
concrete evidence that it actually impacts of tropical storms in terms of
creation, magnitude or frequency. We keep hearing that global warming will
make it worse, but it does not seem like that.
How about the three reasons mentioned above? Well, here's a funny thing:
there are no reported or observed correlation. First, there is no evidence
of storms worsen. On the other hand, some researchers say that CO2 and the
actual global warming pollution balance. Third, the rise of sea level was
just 1-3 mm per year. To claim that it has a major effect on the storms is
a new level of absurdity, unless you SJW. In this case, everything goes.
More progress, fewer victims
If global warming overnight to more people, we should actually consider
changing the policy, but here's the thing "craziest": there are fewer
victims.
In 1900, the "Great Galveston Hurricane," which was "only" a Category 4
storm, killed 6000-12000 people. It was the deadliest hurricane recorded.
Hurricane Katrina (2005) was the fourth deadliest, killing 1500 people. You
can argue that the difference may not be that great, until one remembers
that in 1900 there were about 3 million people in Texas, while Louisiana in
2005 was home to 4.5 million. So we have fewer people die from the
hurricane during the year - absolute and relative terms.
So you're saying I do not know what is happening, and that progress is
useful?
These dreaded fossil fuels are the same as those who evacuated millions of
people. Shelter, medicine and the ability to provide care to people rely on
fuel. Yes, the same substances that emit carbon should be reduced.
It seems that disasters, recorded the deadliest since 1900, were almost all
in the underdeveloped countries. Check out Wikipedia on this point. Oh, and
one of them was after 2000 (the famous 2004 tsunami). Europe experienced
last natural disaster death toll of more than 100,000 in the 16th century
(Netherlands & # 8211; flood). Check this page and you will see that there
are now rarely a natural disaster of historic scale. Progress, which have
brought carbon emissions was the main factor in reducing casualties.
warming activists on the planet - it's a wake up call
This article gives a clear picture: progress has a positive effect on
reducing disaster losses, while it has a clear effect on the climate. As
for hurricanes, it is clear that there is no effect. If we want to reduce
carbon emissions, there is a price, and this price can include human lives.
This website treaty before the reduction of the population. In this case, I
want to use the razor Hanlon - "Never attribute to malice that which is
well explained by stupidity." I do not think there is a real intention to
have more people die in a natural disaster, but that is my opinion.
This is another warning shot for climate scientists and activists "global
warming"
Hurricane Irma is not a wakeup call for President Trump. It is an alarm
call for climate scientists and activists of "global warming". Show some
humility and admit that the situation is complex. Stop trying to design
climate. Stop playing with the economy; you only play into the hands of the
elite. Look at the data, sea levels may not be still rising. I'm not saying
that pollution is good, but I say that a binary state of mind (we are,
everyone is wrong) is false.
Read more: History is full of myths climate change that were used to
control human behavior
No comments:
Post a Comment