After five decades of radical feminist and social concessions, the search
continues for ever tinier things about griping. Many of the & # 8221
microaggressions; hardly qualify as the problems of the first world. Much
is in the eye of the beholder, but n t help that grumpy feminists believe
that the world should revolve around their personal views. There is little
hope of this constructive dialogue can come out of this, unfortunately.
Mansplaining
This involves a man explaining something to a woman,
supposedly-paternalistic way. The basic concept came as a Los Angeles Times
article by Rebecca Solnit, "Men who explain things":
Men explain things to me, and other women, whether or not they know what
they're talking about. A few men. Every woman knows what I mean. It's the
presumption that makes it difficult sometimes for women in all areas;
preventing women to speak and be heard when they dare; that crushes young
women into silence by indicating, the way harassment on the street does,
that this their world. It takes us into self-doubt and self-limiting as it
exercises men excess unsupported s confidence.
Ms. Solnit might feel that all women have had this experience. However, I
can not remember a single instance. For example, when I showed a colleague
how to edit a text file, I certainly didn t do condescending. She was the
head of the IT department and thought she was my boss. My real boss never
gave me a job description because it did it even more jealous and paranoid.
Very long story, but I digress.
Shortly after the article, a user on Livejournal & # 8212; One of these
platforms social media that thrived before Fakebook came & # 8212;
mansplaining coined the word & # 8221;. Nine years later, I m mansplaining
you what it is supposed to mean, and probably do a terrible job because I
have never done or even witnessed.
Ultimately, this is stupid. If someone gives basic information on something
that's already understood, why blow a gasket?
Why it matters: Because guy doesn assume chick knows everything, I suppose?
The final decision: is Condescend condescension, no matter who's doing it.
However, there's no reason to get huffy when no offense is intended.
Manspreading
This occurs when a man sits with supposedly too distant legs. Note that the
maximum acceptable angle is not defined, so it s & # 8220 not dividing line
standard.
As usual, women generally cross their legs or knees together to keep their
modesty. It's probably more comfortable for them because they have wider
hips, unless you have thunder thighs. However, any gift men t think of our
corner of the leg because it's irrelevant. Apparently, women expect to sit
as women.
Usually the context regarding transit; an angle of deemed unacceptable leg
may partially block a vacant adjacent seat. The Toronto Sun quoted Lyndsay
Kirkham, a professor of English feminist, so apparently some sort of
authority aboot it:
If you ride the TTC, most women know the encroachment of bodies of men in
space, they sit, and there is no need, she said. I think it is incredibly
valuable because it is on comfort and physical security. For many people,
this is incredibly & # 8221 triggers.
If you want to sit in a seat and have someone by pressing the leg against
you because they think they have the right to do so, which can be quite
problematic & # 8221.
Oh, Canada! Anyway, what's with Mrs Kirkham's Twitter profile picture
showing her seat and overlapping the two adjacent seats?
This seems rather fishy. Why a word that applying to men? Also, what's
wrong with asking, Can you move over a little & # 8221 ?; If a woman puts a
bag on an adjacent seat, is also an atrocity? I call bullshit.
Why it matters: Because guy reveals package too, I suppose?
The final decision: Quit watching our crotch. Our eyes are here, okay?
male gaze
Oh no & # 8230; he has the eyes!
This idea began in 1975 an article on feminist film theory:
Phallocentrism paradox in all its manifestations is that it depends on the
image of the castrated woman to give order and meaning to the world. An
idea of woman stands as linchpin of the system: it is her lack that
produces the phallus as a symbolic presence, it is her desire to fill the
gap means that the phallus.
This has turned the discussion of cinematic camera angles and panning in
something else:
The male gaze, which refers to the lens through which the white
heterosexual men for the most part are displayed in the world, is a right
lens.
It only gets worse from there. The & # 8221 male gaze; & # 8212's; you
guessed it & # 8212; part of rape culture & # 8220;.
Why it is important: They want dudes blindfolded, I suppose?
The final decision: If women didn t want attention, they all wear burqas d.
topfreedom
The idea is that if people aren t need to wear it, then neither should
women. Shirtless in going hasn & # 8217 public; t been fashionable with the
guys from the 1970s, apart from beaches and others. In fact, if a guy is so
Porky it looks like he pitchers, going shirtless is a crime against
humanity.
Are feminists are so captivated by the negation of leftist biology they
forget that only women sweater puppies? Contrary to their beliefs, the
breasts are secondary sex characteristic. Different cultures have different
standards of dress simply but arguing that s hard to bear at least a bikini
top is absurd. If they feel like bouncing em, no object if they go to a
nude beach or other naturist recreation area.
Why it is important: In fact, go ahead unless're really stoned.
The final decision: Apparently, women can t decide whether they want us to
check them. Fortunately, we don t care.
finally
Ted Kennedy haabah
What brigade chip on the shoulder feminist do if they finally can t imagine
anything else to complain about? Since they're so good at making a mountain
out of a molehill, surely they can design impressive bras push-up.
Learn more: 9 Types of Feminists and how to counter them
No comments:
Post a Comment