Wednesday, September 6, 2017

What Antifa Want?

Recently, The Manual Antifa was found at Evergreen College, America's
campus-out pozzed more perhaps with the exception of Columbia and Berkeley.
It doesn t go to urban guerrilla tactics (which was informative reading),
but it does focus on ideology and offers an open look eye to the kind of
world they want.
It's not really an official document; Antifa is too decentralized to them.
Thus, one could argue that the unnamed author doesn t speak for all.
However, this is apparently someone intimately familiar with their rhetoric
and objectives.
What Antifa?

They represent an alliance of convenience between communism and anarchism,
symbolized by a red flag covering a black flag. Anarchy has a following,
which is the most realistic in the broadest sense of the local authority.
However, as for the traditional sense of the government is, this stuff is
for failed states and fourteen. Yet these guys should study history and see
how Anarchists and Communists heard during the USSR's early days and the
Spanish Civil War s days later.
Many Antifa cells became infamous for staging violent demonstrations
against-with improvised weapons. They're sometimes known to recruit
homeless people, seem to have a cult-like environment, and I want to make
the US ungovernable. According to a former member, the use of hard drugs is
common. In total, violent cells act as paramilitaries extreme left.
They consider enemies
Wedgie time to fierce Red Guard in Berkeley
As their name suggests, they oppose fascism. The definition of fascism is
questionable; I d & # 8217 Mussolini take the doctrine of fascism as a
starting point. However, it seems that some Antifa members have their own
particular definition.
The first page begins:
Do not feed to cis [sexed] white men not PoC [black people] non-LGBTQ
people. Fascists also called
So there you have it & # 8212; all straight white guy is a fascist.
Anarchists such as Mikhail Bakunin and Kropotkin fall into this broad
category; Similarly, countless traditional liberals like Al Gore and Bernie
Sanders.
Warnings to keep the documents secret appear twice elsewhere. That is
curious; Generally, political programs are made available to the public as
widely as possible. What kind of movement wouldn t mean what they're all
about, loudly? It advertising, right?
their motivations
Res ipse loquitur
After the opening, the first topic is & # 8221 white privilege;. It starts
indicating that the printing press, newspapers and television were still
controlled by the white guy. Curiously, no complaints were made about the
press in Japan, China and Korea are dominated by Asia, but I'll be a
killjoy. Then this:
Some of our kind have begun to infiltrate positions of high power in large
media organizations.
Subsequent parts of the document further emphasize support of the media.
Its author must meet the journalism students leftist toxically I attended
college with, doing their part to push through MSM as these dopes Antifa
were dirty diapers. They certainly weren t the first batch of either media
manipulators!
And of course, & # 8230; the new king of the diffusion of the idea is
Social Media.
Here is some truth at last. If social media didn t exist to discuss the MSM
was well Indifference, then Hillary would be president. Today, increasing
censorship is only on the control of thought & # 8212; despite the pretext
& # 8212; but all that's another matter.
Check it out, someone took a sociology class!
The rest is essentially the same idiocy that guilt impressionable students
have been brainwashed for decades. People like me are a bunch of warmongers
who have done nothing good for the world, blah blah blah. (If it's just our
nature, then why are we supposed to feel guilty?) Apparently, the writer
has never heard of peaceful people like the Mongol Golden Horde, the
Aztecs, Shaka Zulu, or Imperial Japanese army.
Tips on rhetoric
Yes, literally!
The next section, Creating a culture of tolerance & # 8221; says:
Each critical idea of ​​our movement or our thinking must be condemned as:
racist, homophobic, misogynist, etc.
Then it recommends deploying the hitlerum reductio ad when losing an
argument. dissenting minorities must be silenced, because they don t know
what s right for them. As for the white dissidents, another section is
called Believe way we do or you'll be fired & # 8221;. (Enough tolerant,
right?) Dude, tell us something new!
But what if you're a patriotic blue Smurf?
The author exults:
In 2117, one hundred years, our goal is to have 70% of the US population is
non-white.
This must be done by illegal immigration (which should be named something
else), anchor babies, emotional appeals, and (in Accelerating Progress)
abortion.
Does seem a tad too far? Really, everything is pretty docile; Are not
liberals already on board with these things? Well, as long as s never
affects their own neighborhoods, but good luck with that one.
Their real goals
What a mess & # 8230;
 Phase 2: The Socialization of Capital opens:
Never reveal our endgame, but the obvious next step once we control the
media is the socialization of capital.
We already know how communism works.
As for the details, health care must be taken care of first and then the
media will become worker-owned, controlled entities ANTIFA & # 8221. Then
they will seize banks and finance and technology and manufacturing. When
these useful idiots realize that they're working, anyway?
Easy solution: put the crack pipe.
 Phase 3: New World Order offers universal microchip. However, this horror
even Orwell imagined would be used to fairly lame objectives:
Imagine a world where you never have to call the new n-word. Imagine a
world where you can be as gay as you want, and not be called a rage, cock
sucking fa ** ot & # 8221.
Apparently someone's been fired a few too many times. For the record, as
deplorable & # 8221; as I am, the above is not how I talk. The document
describes how obsessive enough microchips and DNA samples will be used to
determine which n-word liens against that engages & # 8221 hate speech; so.
Then he goes to the very general details about shouting opponents and
morality of violence.
While Osama avenged the Japanese, and it has nothing to do with jihad?
still trying to understand it & # 8230;
 Phase 4: A world government promises they'll be communism from next time.
They made a huge mess of it, but to give them another chance & # 8212;
basically what Leon Trotsky said. Then they'll get to redistribution of
wealth, which means:
& # 8230; carry [ing] brown poverty stricken around the world to the (old)
in the United States and Western Europe.
This camp things Saints is really nothing new.
According to the plan, those who can t get a job allocation and unlimited
free drugs. (The numbers, I mentioned earlier that Antifa like drugs.)
Unlike its author illusions, in a communist society, and dope fiends riders
would be dead weight.
Will shit for real?

Some have speculated that s satire, or a false flag operation. I doubt. If
I felt like writing a piece of black propaganda Antifa name, I & # 8217, to
do a much better job than this dreary mess. Let's just say they get a lot
of heat on them (as they deserve it), and that's just the beginning.
On the contrary, The Antifa Manual is exactly what social justice butthurt
Warrior write after marinated in a sociology course featuring the
microaggression theory and grotesquely biased interpretations of history.
It is mainly a propaganda that regurgitation leftmost preached for years.
Millions of impressionable students are indoctrinated with this kind of
nonsense, while resulting in huge debt.
Really, it is rather disorganized and amateurish tactics rehashing started
it decades ago, do not know their current success. Leftist professors
neglected to mention s globalists in the media today, large corporations,
and other large institutions already growing cultural Marxism.
In addition, all Lenin chair must be smoking weed powerful enough to
imagine that plutocrats leave screwballs ultra-radicals take over their
companies and throw out of their hideout. The tail is not wagging the dog.

I m deeply embarrassed for today's leftists. Their movement used for a lot
more sense, and even was exciting. These guys used to have the substance. A
century ago, they were union leaders, sensitive social reformers, and
people like Theodore Roosevelt and Jack London. The former communist
central planners did their best (despite imperfect local) to build
societies that worked; they weren t Whack-campus employment haunting safe
spaces and # 8221;. What happened?
Read more: We must thank Emily Rose Nauert For Scaring women to become SJWs

No comments: