Power is a vast subject. Every important aspect of our life is linked to
it. This is evident in the game, where the rule is to be obtained or
simulated, and where women are resorting to shit tests, chipping, emotional
blackmail or the apparent unpredictability, and this is no less true in
politics, culture or the economy. The reason why your work is outsourced is
that some have the power to win. Similarly, you want to freelance or dive
into a foreign country to take your life back from them and still have a
future.
Power has many subtleties. It takes whole books to give it a slightly
comprehensive coverage. Aside from real life experience, the student would
be inspired to read history books on specific characters or periods or
parts of the contemporary economy, politics, and related topics, with an
eye careful on what to get. Those who hate us were doing before we were
born and their heirs SJW go into a frenzy when we dare to do something as
small as a public meeting.
However, still too the special events side can lead us to lose sight of the
basics. A true sense of the power of what others are doing and what we can
or could do is better trained by switching back and forth between things no
other minute can care, energy masculine and timeless meditations. Here I
will insist on the second element and mention several books worth reading
on power in general. This is the first of a piece of two parts, with the
current conventional & # 8212 dealing; but not old & # 8212; books and
other more contemporary material.
Republic 1.Plato
This work has never turned old in 2500 and is unlikely to age at all.
Written as a long-term dialogue, the Republic discusses justice, moral and
political, and discusses related topics such as political systems and the
virtues of a proper citizen. Through his spokesman Socrates, Plato responds
to various theories of justice he considers narrow or false, and meditates
fitness and goodness of different characters.
Although fifth century BC. BC Greece was a mess of the city-States, Plato
wrote of context is rather refreshing. Greeks then were independent,
versatile and masculine. Respectable men in Athens earned citizenship
status and their word at general meetings. Plato's dialogues are infused
with subtle masculinity, intelligent. They are an example of a time and
place where citizens & # 8212; uncastrated "officials" & # 8212; could
systematically address the complex issues still relevant in their lives,
and stand atop all noisy globalists who today pretend to discuss the same
topics.
Plato's Republic also contains pieces of anthology, like the allegory of
the cave, the myth of Er, or a discussion of how even a city perfect
condition can escalate into a mass schlubs ruled tyrant. shit tests are
Womanly part of the process of degeneration (see 549d-e).
2. Aristotle's Politics
A first disciple of Plato, Aristotle was growing dissatisfied with at least
some of the teachings of his master. As an adult, he would address similar
issues from a slightly different angle and criticize certain ideas usually
Platonic & # 8212; for example, in a perfect town of wife and children can
be shared. Less than meditation, more practice-oriented, Plato, Aristotle
would become just as influential as him, and the two philosophers were to
become a great complementary duo.
The Aristotle's Politics are a loose collection of treaties. The order of
its parts are far from certain, and even occasions academic debates.
Nevertheless, what the philosopher had to say most of the time is clear,
and to someone who is not used to this philosophy can be easier to read
than the long Republic.
A keen observer of things, Aristotle managed to gather no less than 158
constitutions and paintings, including one he himself had written, before
starting the parking policy. resulting output offers with various
interrelated topics: political communities nuclear families to entire
cities, political systems "natural" and those who are simply the result of
the subsequent degeneration, which should be considered a citizen at the
most sense strong and which should not.
Notable pieces include considerations on how men and women should be
regulated labor (Politics, Book VII, chap.16) on the causes of dissension
between other citizens (Book V, chapter 2) or the middle class (book VI,
chapter 11).
Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle 3
While the policy deals with what is usually considered the policy, which
was then considered primarily militarized or politicized, the Nicomachean
Ethics covers more individual questions. Here Aristotle begins with a
philosophical problem. Different people are aimed at different products,
and if asked what good and justice, they will give each other different,
mutually exclusive responses. Does this mean that there is no essential
good and that everything is relative? As mentioned above, Aristotle rejects
this idea. He embarks on a quest to restore a proper hierarchy of ends, so
that the different temperaments and covers all unite in one supreme good.
The first book of ethics alone is worth getting a copy. Aristotle
distinguishes the action of production (free men acting in the highest
sense, slaves are dedicated to consumables), confirms the capacity,
knowledge and other things that can not be stolen over issue, and how a
truly righteous man can go up the flow of contingencies:
If the activities are, as we said, giving life to his character, no happy
man can become miserable; because it will never do the acts that are
hateful and mean. For the man who is truly good and wise, we think, door
lifetime of opportunities and flattering always the best, as a good general
makes the best military use of the army at his command and a good shoemaker
makes the best shoes on the hides that are given. (Nicomachean Ethics, Book
I, chap.10)
Aristotle also expands the concept of arete, a word often translated
as "excellent" or "virtue" but also referred to the appropriate end or a
thing or a person. One could say that Aristotelian arete is the Greek
equivalent of Swadharma a Hindu.
Beyond the list of virtues and comparing characters, a year seemed to
appreciate Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics developed several theories: for
example, that courage is the necessary condition of all the other virtues,
a coward never releases situations where it may exercise other virtues, or
that happiness goes with living virtuously. Overall, a meditation on the
power of self and others, on the ends and what a good life.
4. Arthashastra Kautilya
Decades or centuries after Aristotle, an alleged Hindu royal advisor named
Kautilya wrote what would become the greatest political treatise of India.
Parts of its name which means respectively external products (Artha) and
the written code or set of requirements (shastra), this book was written
for a king or ruler.
The Arthashastra distilling experience of centuries in the art of
governing. It considers the relevant aspects of sovereignty, necessary or
possible situations, and many possible answers. Kautilya also addresses
advice from other advisors on matters under its consideration.
Max Weber was impressed by this book, said he "put Machiavelli to shame. "I
generally find Weber overrated and ambiguous, but this particular case,
he's right. Kautilya gives a complete picture of what is like
administration and should be considered if one wants to maintain its course
in tumultuous times. You do not need to possess a kingdom to find the value
here. Reading the Arthashastra gives foresight, ideas for strategic
planning and help make sense of the seemingly unpredictable actions of
others.
The only drawback with the Arthashastra is its length. The English
translation in 1915 goes beyond 600 pages. On the other hand, no one said
it would be easy. Particularly noteworthy are our first book, which deals
with "discipline" and examines issues such as the fatal flaws sovereign
must avoid or how to test other people; Book VII, the possible
configurations on the battlefield; and Book XII, on what to do in case of
attack by a powerful enemy.
5. Prince Machiavelli
The most famous book ever written about the power, the Prince & # 8212
Machiavelli, published in 1532, almost at the time that Ignatius Loyola
founded the Jesuit order (1534) & # 8212; appears in a context of great
agitation. Italy was then fragmented into small republics and small
principalities, constantly at war against each other to win.
Born Florentine noble Nicholas Machiavelli had the opportunity to conduct
diplomatic missions and help the very "Machiavellian" Cesar Borgia. He was
also a devoted scholar of ancient texts. These influences have allowed him
to take the place of his sovereign and give it a corpus advises to conquer
the whole of Italy.
Although the target audience, the prince seems less written from the
perspective of an established rule and an adventurer than expected.
Machiavelli explains how to manage a kingdom and keep it. It focuses on how
the reputation is important, how to be liked, admired and feared, and what
virtues are useful or favorably judged. A ruler must be wary of courtiers
who flatter to take over. Machiavelli also remains on various examples of
non-obvious power situations, such as why the conquests of Alexander the
Great did not rebel after his death, or why some past leaders were getting
results as they did.
Concise and short, the Prince may be more attractive than the work
mentioned above. Those who read the 48 laws will notice obvious borrowings
& # 8212; for example, Machiavelli criticizes the use of fortresses and
note that the empirical rules repeatedly. But the prince is also narrower
than the other work and I could not help but find much less inspiring.
6. Secret probable Jesuits rules (Monita secreta)
Now we come lately and it happens that many interesting texts or
thought-provoking have been shelved. The secret rules or Monita Secreta in
the original Latin, is an apocryphal piece was written by a Jesuit priest
in the sixteenth century. As I have already devoted an entire room to the
secret rules, I will not go much further here.
Described as a mix of "Machiavelli and St. Thomas', which adequately
expresses the main influences of the time, the Regulation explains how a
Jesuit should behave as to advance the interests of his order. A Jesuit
should care about doing a good reputation thanks to selective care and
signage virtue, have a lot of cat paws between the powerful and the humble,
know how to extract the wealth of a rich widow or innocent scapegoat when
someone one has to bear the weight of a known and # 8212; and Jesuit made &
# 8212; mischief.
Whoever wrote this book understood how the Jesuits have taken a very
earthly lemonade from a place where the lemons are to be spiritual. The
secret rules is very short, and if you are somewhat familiar with European
history, you must go through with ease.
7. From the Elders of Zion Protocols
Sponsored historians generations have worked hard so you do not dive into
it. (The latest example :. French Copywriter Pierre-André Taguieff, which
published an entire book to dig up dirt "anti-Semitic" around the
protocols, has links with the Jewish Freemasonry) Read this work and you
will understand why.
The protocols address contemporary issues such as the prevalence of a
financialized economy, the use of traditional media, the breakdown of the
family unit and others from the perspective of an alleged cunning Jew
speaking to peers.
Although the author of the book is a tangled issue (it is difficult to
think that people plotting how to conquer the world would have left such a
document incriminating behind), its contents adequately describe many
trends that would show decades after was written and the similarity between
what protocols and describe known fact is too important for them to have
been made out of the air.
Read more: 6 Ways The globalist establishment has obtained worldwide
Supremacy
No comments:
Post a Comment