Touching a woman's breasts without consent is an example of sexual assault
manual (if sufficiently proven in court). Yet a growing number of feminists
argue that the two female breasts and nipples on them should be & # 8221
desexualised. If this rather stupid policy proposal was never implemented,
it would be illogical and unfair indeed for anyone touching a woman's
breasts to ever be accused, let alone convicted of sexual assault.
However, this is exactly what the braindead feminists argue for mass:
As for me, I am happy with the status quo: the breasts are parts of very
sexual body than the male chest, and so laws should exist and be enforced
to prevent these breasts are groped without permission. My only concern (!
And a very big) is with the standards of proof and procedures to prove
someone almost always a man accused actually did sexually assault a woman's
breasts. Otherwise, the laws as they exist today on paper are largely good.
It is generally accepted that a man touching s Pecs will lead to you being
arrested for sexual assault, whether you are male or female. Similarly,
typing on the shoulder of someone very non-sexual is a universally accepted
way to get their attention. If some feminists categories wish desexualizing
breasts and female nipples in line with the male chest and nipples, they
must accept the same results as when we men are always hit on the shoulder
or chest & # 8211; It's not sexual assault that can be alleged or
prosecuted.
Feminist typists type obtained
Back when Cosmopolitan didn t argue that weren t sexualized breasts.
As we expect these high brow publications as Cosmopolitan have expressed
interest desexualizing the nipple and therefore the breasts. The stupidity
of Eliza Thompson article would be hilarious if it were not tragic
implications arguments usually end up like his begetting. In arguing for a
kind of perverse & # equal 8221; treatment to men and women chests, Eliza
advocates that women really should not have recourse to the law of sexual
assault if they find their strength breasts touched or caressed each.
This kind of feminist solipsism probably try to strengthen in claiming that
women can sexualisation and desexualizing their breasts and nipples at
will. Regarding show in public, their breasts are fully desexualised. But
if someone touches the breast, feminists reserve the right to have them
treated as sexually that genitals are. So there is not even a strong field
patina on which to base such a ridiculous proposition Release the nipple or
breast & # desexualizing 8221. It is the female equivalent of a reflex
circle.
How many times women touch your chest?
This fan has a better chance of hitting Nicholas Cage's chest my chance to
touch Miranda Kerr s & # 8211; and for good reason.
It happens all the time for me. Recent examples in my own life include:
Photos taken in a nightclub Bratislava. Through seven images, I spotted
four girls with their dead hand on my breast center, open palm.
I made a joke to a Slovenian birthday girl aged 24 to 24 years is 52 years
of women in the male, so she better hurry up and have children. She
playfully pushed my chest and kept his hands there much longer it should
have.
A friend came behind me in London and grabbed my chest behind to surprise
me.
There was no sexual assault in these cases because in legal terms the adult
male chest is not sexualized, or at least not as sexualized as female
breast. Desexualizing breasts and nipples require a female non-compliance
with laws similar sexual assault to have meaning whatsoever. Combining my
experience with yours and these are exactly the things that feminists have
to accept sometimes they and other women if they succeed in desexualizing
whatever body part they want desexualised.
Of course, many, including myself, continue to deal with breasts as sexual
body parts, and they behave accordingly. Others not. If anything, the Free
Nipple and social retardisms bound represent a desire by feminists to
deliberately inflict harm and sexual assault on other women. Who says women
don t hate?
Breasts are very sexual & # 8211; to benefit women and let # 8217; s keep
it that way
Her boobs are sexualized and for good reason.
Unless a woman is breastfeeding in public (and thank you to those women who
are childless feminists cat lady), there are strong reasons why breasts are
deliberately kept sexualized, socially and in terms of the law.
& # 8221 equality; Men and women coffers is not only a rejection of common
sense, it will promote the actual sexual assault under the flimsy guise of
non-discrimination between the sexes. It is similar to offer equal rights
menstruation when men are not periods.
More: Bizarre College Approach to sexual assault
No comments:
Post a Comment