A very emphatic but very smart, strong and witty radio talk show called
Michael Savage refers to the war left on American values as an attack on
our "borders, language and culture. "I do not think individual pundit or
commentator summarized more accurately this great divide in three simple
words.
The attack on our language in particular, is very dangerous, but effective
tactics & # 8211; it is a battle between intellectuals in the wider war
against our borders and culture, a war which expands and embraces all the
widest range of both the educated and uneducated on both sides of the
debate. That is to say, it does not take an educated man to notice the
attack on our borders and culture, but we can not say for such an attack
calculated on our language.
The English language is a beautiful and complex. For non-native speakers,
it is difficult to learn, and many US citizens graduates with college
degrees still can not write an effective thesis in their own mother tongue.
As such, it is impossible to overstate how disconcerting it is for the
majority of the population are not fully aware that their language was
taken hostage and is compromised daily. The words have little meaning more,
and great speakers this generation & # 8211; men like Alan Watts,
Christopher Hitchens, and other great masters of the word turn definitely
in their graves over what is happening today.
Here are some examples of how the Left has invented new words or kidnapped
existing ones to try to redefine them according to their agenda:
& # 8221 Islamophobia;
A persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation
that leads to a compelling desire to avoid & # 8221. & # 8211;
Dictionary.com
There is no such thing as an irrational fear or aversion to Islam. As for
the specific principles of the Koran and Hadith, the fear of those ideas
being exported to your country is incredibly rational. In addition, an
aversion to stoning women for adultery, throwing homosexuals from roofs or
apostates decapitation seems not only rational, but noble. One could make a
strong argument that to be anti-Islam was synonymous with being pro-human
rights.
The word "Islamophobia" is a ploy & # 8211; a propaganda word used by
Islamists who believe it should be illegal to criticize Islam, to deter the
infidels to the public. As Marco Rubio said, let's dispel the idea that
those who use the word do not know what they do. They just what they do
because they are often lawyers, professors and people of average
intelligence.
We all agree that the discomfort just to see a Hindu or Sikh family on your
flight could be a true testament to intolerance, but that
the "Islamophobia" crowd have deliberately conflate the generic bigotry
towards people with skin brown with the opposition to Islamic doctrine.
This is very dangerous because of the possibility of a slippery slope
progression. Yesterday, he drew Muhammad, he is now criticizing Islam, and
tomorrow he is to be a non-Muslim.
Rape
I can not even.
. The unlawful sexual intercourse or other sexual penetration of the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person, with or without force, with a
sexual organ, the other part of the body or foreign body, without the
consent of the victim and # 8221; & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Have you noticed the qualifier penetration?
We all know the universally discredited myth that claims 1-5 women are the
victims of "sexual assault" on college campuses, but we'll break it down.
Apparently a study was conducted in 2007 concluded that the above
assertion. This wacky study and inherently flawed probed an extremely small
sample of women, deliberated on the terms of the issues in the waves, broad
as possible.
The only study interviewed 5,446 women in two universities, and included
highly subjective questions such as:
"Have you been unable to give consent or to stop what was going on because
you were unconscious, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep? "
"Can you tell us about sexual encounters you think (not sure) happened? "
The first step was to blur the lines between rape, a very specific term,
and sexual assault, a term much larger and a little less severe. The second
step was to expand the definition of "sexual assault" to include rude
comments, touching of the hair or shoulders, even consensual sex between
two drunken adults resulted in women buyer's remorse the next day. The
third step is the vagueness of the definition of consent as a woman waiting
to act responsibly was much lower than a man's, while his speech in a court
meant much more than the his.
Once the term "sexual assault" was diluted in meaning and it was made
interchangeable with rape, which allowed Proctors of the study to double
their confirmation bias and say that 1 in 5 women have actually raped on
American university campuses, painting on unfair picture of men
as "potential rapists" and the American campus as more dangerous than ISIS
territory for a young woman.
& # 8221 racism;
A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a
race & # 8221. & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Dating from the 1970s, the extreme left has hijacked the word "racism" to
include vague conclusions "power." This is an extension of "critical race
theory," which was made popular by a handful of black male and (mostly
obese) university professors white women. He kept a pulse due to modern
racing Hustlers as Marc Lamont Hill and Michael Eric Dyson constantly
referring to during their word salad a week on CNN / MSNBC.
This alternative definition with strong implications of "power" is not a
public definition outside academic classrooms radical left or commentator
panels & # 8220 Said, new stations, but as the far left develops and
becomes more vocal, this definition is more shouting with megaphones
vehemently with each passing year.
These vague conclusions "could" are generally accompanied by other words
the liberal mode as "institutional" and "systemic". These words are as
deliberately broad and generally based on philosophical tropes, referring
to how the effects of slavery are "intractable" even 160 years later. These
race hustlers must fall back on old clichés in the absence of an abundance
of specific examples today. Note that some systemic racism (emails
Ministry: Ferguson Police) are not sufficient evidence to condemn a whole
country of 330 million people "systemic racism".
The goal is simple: to give the impression that whites have a monopoly on
racism. It gives non-whites carte blanche to take their anti-white racism
as they want, because by definition they can not be racist. Forget tens of
millions of white people who live in poverty as we removed an election of a
black president and black attorney general, but even black life loosely
affiliated terrorist material "can not be racist" because they not benefit
from these invisible, so "systems" -called discriminatory, which have been
abolished in the 1960 s.
I waited as long for someone to ask Marc Lamont Hill, Michael Eric Dyson,
or Shaun Talc X & # 8221; King if whites can be racist in South Africa
where they face a genocide, or Zimbabwe, where a government decree they can
not own land. I'm still waiting.
& # 8221 Nazi;
A member of the National Socialist German Workers Party, which controlled
Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler & # 8211; Dictionary.com
There are very few Nazis still living. Many of them are in their 90's and
continued throughout the world for war crimes committed there seven years.
There is indeed a movement resurgent neo-Nazis in the West, largely in
response to this global attack on our borders, language and culture. The
neo-Nazis represent an extreme profound perversion of what we
affectionately call "Western culture". They are absolutist and totalitarian
in their way, what separates them from the rest of the conservatives.
These individuals have been marginalized and relegated to the fringes of
society where they belonged. People like David Duke had not heard in twenty
years, until CNN resurrected him as a weapon to maul with Trump during the
primaries. The movement of white supremacy as a whole was dug in the
darkness by Antifa, who needed an enemy to hit. These neo-Nazis are
throwbacks who share the ideology of the Nazis, but they are not Nazis.
They are impostors Nazis and not nearly as dangerous or intimidating than
the original version, as much as they wish they were.
There are a wide range of sectarianism on the far right, not every
conservative is someone like Richard Spencer. However, the extreme left has
gone nuclear with the term "Nazi" to almost everyone on this side of the
50-yard line. It was quite an exaggeration to say that Milo Yiannopoulos, a
homosexual who prefers black men of a neo-Nazi, but the left has lost any
remaining credibility when calling people like Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris
Nazis. Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew, Harris is a liberal atheist, and both
are strong supporters of the State of Israel. The day these men were called
Nazis for the first time was the irony of the day died.
These examples are not the only four I can think of, but if you are in a
public debate and a word is used in the context mentioned above,
respectfully show that there is no speech that both parties show respect
for the language we all agreed. And if they insist, make sure they
understand that the deployment of the extraordinary luxury of redefining
the words at will could be their non-white privilege speak.
More: this may be the best way to learn a language
No comments:
Post a Comment