Saturday, April 29, 2017

The root cause of our problems with the government's tight Centralization

Have you ever wondered why the leftists can grow their programs in
government
even when they are blatantly against the will of the majority? How they
get away with this? In a representative democracy, it should not work that
way, but "should not" and five dollars gets you a cheeseburger. Excessive
centralization helps to impose their will to the public.
entryism

The birthplace of the Frankfurt School, the think tank that communist
subverted American universities

organizations has long since infiltrating leftist strategy, the most famous
with the concept of "Long March by the institutions." Not only have they
used this tactic to absorb rival factions, they used to subvert
cultural institutions and even governments. When they appointed
leading positions, they will fight tooth and nail to get their
like-minded friends at all levels. Once a critical mass is reached,
anyone with a different ideology can forget to do this job.

This is also why the Conservatives in the departments of the faculty of
social sciences
quite rare. After the baby boomers became indoctrinated teachers, they
promoting their peers and excluded everyone with other viewpoints. (The
only way for others to get in is to hide their views throughout their
academic career to tenure, which takes years of
action method.) This is also how the leftists have control on the advice of
Directors of large companies and impose a culture left.
Most likely, this is how they took philanthropic foundations, while
their founders Gilded Age are turning in their graves on how their
money is spent.

What can we do about it? As for government agencies, the Office certainly
not reform. With careful effort those who abused their power
could be eradicated, as Joseph McCarthy tried until the media shut up
down. The simplest way is to abolish the agency. As for companies,
the best that can be done is to get the word and stop buying them
some products. As for universities, we have to send our children to some
pozzed not out yet. In addition, we can set up parallel
institutions, as I proposed with the art scene, although this is obviously
long-term effort. We can stage our Long March, but will require
a lot of time, effort and organization.

If an institution is taken, will apparatchiks are found in the
same position as all the Rust Belt factory workers who were scared
luck after their jobs were sent overseas? Most likely, it will not
difficult to
find another cushy gig where they can push their policy. They can rush
to find another agency infest, or who are placed a high
position in a holding activism, or enter another racquet as Lefty
journalism; in both cases, they benefit from all connections
they did.

Surely there must be a better way. Pinochet had his methods, although for
United States, return things to the way they were designed go far.
Federalism

Thomas Jefferson, president and architect of the United States Constitution

The United States was designed as a federal republic, with states retaining
autonomy. Even in the early days, there were tensions between
federalists, who want greater autonomy by states and
Antifederalists greater centralization. Desiring the federalist position
prevailed for nearly a century.

States are theoretically sovereign, with the potential to act as a country
their own; and they are called the states rather than the provinces. This
consideration was a significant factor in why the former colonies, newly
independent, has agreed to enter the federal government of the United
States in the first
in law. The Tenth Amendment says:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibits States, are reserved to the States respectively, or
the people.

The Supreme Court, but has not taken too seriously. For
eg, United States v *. Darby Lumber * decision about the deals
as non-being:

The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been
handed.

subsidiarity

Pope Pius XI, author of the encyclical Quadragesimo Anno

The Catholic doctrine of subsidiarity is a good idea, whether or not it is
your brand of religion. The basic principle is that a function must be
managed by smaller competent body to deal with it. The only exception is
when the designated body is in trouble and needs the help of a
upper body. Otherwise, the more the authorities take a back seat and leave
well
enough alone.

Thus, if one can manipulate the education level of the state, the federal
the government should let them take care. Note that always states
expected, this education is what they did for themselves
traditionally and centralization came with the Department of Education.
Furthermore, given that families are able to raise children, the government
should abut unless a family is struggling. Government dependency is
an abnormal state, but has become a way of life for much of the
public.

Big government opposes this concept, of course. An example is funny when Al
Gore proposed a government agency to provide news on traffic flows. then a
commentator pointed out that the private sector is already Gore
would know if he turned on the radio in his chauffeured limousine instead
listen to whale sounds.
local control Benefits

Capitol in Topeka, Kansas

When power is maintained at the local level, people are more involved in
public life. You are still a fish in a very large bowl, but nationally
level, you are a fish in a sea of ​​hundreds of millions. It's a lot
easier to get an audience with a municipal mayor or councilor
President or a member of Congress. Moreover, the moral benefits from the
public when people
greater accessibility and support for local government that wields the real
Power.

They said "you can not fight City Hall" -More specifically, there is a rise
battle. Although it is virtually impossible for an individual to stand up
Washington, short of having millions for lobbyists, legal fees or "campaign
contributions ". Decentralization means that people are more in control.

In addition, greater power for local government allows things to run
according to the sensitivity of the people who live there. The Northeast and
the left side can have liberal policies and "Flyover Country" may have
conservative policies, and everyone is happier that way. Those who do not
as it where they can move to another state, which is much easier
than going to another country. In addition, federal social programs should
be
reduced to the level of the state, the Constitution does not provide things
as Obamacare (despite what the Supreme Court), AFDC, etc.

Each state will be a unique experience; one that provides the best
social outcome, the greater responsiveness to the public,
greater efficiency will be a model that other states can copy. This should
be more effective because of huge bureaucracies suffer from diseconomies
scale (several layers of high-level to highly paid administrators, more
trouble
coordination meetings, etc.) that waste Other Washington
Legendary: lovers deals, huge stocks of reserve stocks they do not
need, and so on.

All of this is how was supposed federalism work. Finally, decentralization
takes power away from unaccountable bureaucrats in Washington. SJW can type
support a federal agency, but will have a much harder time
infiltrating fifty state capitals. If they try, citizens will have a
easier to oppose them.
How Federalism was repealed

The beginning of the end for federalism. The next step on the way was FDR
the administration and the Supreme Court Warren forward.

Civil war the ball for more centralization. the
Fourteenth Amendment, a reconstruction of measuring the time includes
the "equal
protection clause ". His intention was to prevent men from Southern Law
turn their eyes to the crimes committed against freedmen. Successive
judicial "interpretations" of this autonomy gutted States.
The Fourteenth Amendment also allows for anchor babies to be US citizens,
after which their illegal foreign families can get welfare benefits. Other
than
that the commerce clause among the States of the Constitution was abused as
tote means for federal power grab.

Liberal members of the Supreme Court get away with this stuff through
the "life
Document "doctrine. (Note the clever tactic of framing.) Although
Constitution has some gray areas intended to be completed by
previous, they have much further. * Early in Marbury v. Madison *
decision, the Supreme Court itself said the final authority on what the
said the Constitution.

Since the Warren court, time and again they have abused their power
Bench legislate their political and rationalize after the fact.
The concept of "living document" means the Constitution is everything they
say.
The word-salad tormented the famous Roe v *. * Wade is Exhibit A
here, which repealed the laws of all fifty states on a non issue
mentioned in the Constitution. A series of decisions of the 1970s allowed
pornography to flourish. These are two examples of many who have profoundly
transformed the American political landscape.

Through the 1950s, the government more or less even lip service to
the federalist principles of the Constitution. For example, the highway
road network was sold as a defense project. The Congress has no
the power to set up a national road network only for public use, but the
defense
the projects are covered as delegated by the Constitution. Much more
recently, the threat of withholding federal funds from the road was used to
blackmail states into accepting laws (such as the old speed of 55 MPH
limit) would normally be a state law matter.
The effects of bureaucratic control leftist

In general, if people who work in an agency like you,
indifferent to you, or do not like you made the difference as to whether
your application is processed immediately, you go through the normal
gauntlet
tape, or you are given an endless race around. If you are connected,
fats significantly the administrative wheels. It's pretty
important for businesses that need licenses and operating permits. Major
Operators who make heavy political contributions will open doors
their; small businesses trying to break in the game are unfamiliar
territory and must play "hurry up and wait." It should not work that way,
But remember what I said earlier "should".

A rather obvious example was the IRS scandal in Obama
administration. Conservative groups require 501 (c) nonprofit
Certification is mired for years; other groups have their requests
treated quickly. There was a congressional investigation of this, surely
great effort to get to. The results, however, were the top dogs IRS
all clammed, and no confession. IRS abuse of powers was an element
Nixon Articles of Impeachment, but the consequences of not Lightworker.
The only fallout was the abandonment of tobacco IRS official and two others
who are retiring.
Otherwise, Donald Trump taxes have been audited
Coincidentally year?

Bureaucrats like you or not makes a big difference with social
services too. One of my friends fell on hard times and tried to apply
for government assistance. She got evasive answers to be white. All animals
are
equal but some animals are more equal than others.
Leftists effects on education

An actual document in some schools

Centralized control of education has had profound effects. It's pretty
disgusting educrats use their position to indoctrinate students,
especially those who are too young to make their own judgments. My first
exposure to political propaganda at school was when I was in second grade.
My third text social studies quality was full of bias, but I did not
then achieve. No doubt the time were innocent as indoctrination
arrives in kindergarten these days.

The worst example evangelizes transsexuality in schools. Some of them
children will have to screw up their bodies to block puberty
drugs, and even get the surgery, before they really know what they do to
is. Note that when Gyorgy Lucaks established an in your face sex
education program in Hungary to tackle the classic morality (he
called "cultural terrorism"), Hungarians rose and overthrew Bela
Kun's communist regime. I guess they did a better job of "boil
frog slowly "here.

Title IX prohibits discrimination based on sex in institutions funded by
the federal government. His
An example of a law that looks like basic fairness, but is used for other
purposes that the public is not anticipated. Funding for sports programs
must be equal for men and women. Since men are more interested
sports (including participation) than women, this means that many men
programs eventually excised while the women's programs (even enough
obscure sport) flourished. He also worked in this way for the universities,
even
if they do not receive direct federal funding.

More recently, the Obama administration has used Title IX implement
extrajudicial
courts to rule on sex campuses. Any improper college loses
federal funding. It is little wonder that false accusations have become a
big problem lately. Whenever a crime * really * happens, it should be
handled
by municipal police; it's their job. These courts are not
legitimate authority to administer the law, or (as expected) are due process
protections.

So * this * is what happens when the government puts strings attached
billions in funding. The basic common program also got a lot of criticism.
This would not have happened if there was no Ministry of Education.
In summary

Centralization how unelected bureaucrats hijack government functions.
For this reason, putting things federalist design by
The founding fathers must be a key step in the drainage of the marshes. It
will not be
easily, particularly since Antonin Scalia, one of the judges of the Supreme
Court
worthy of the name-earned treat Breitbart, but it must be done.

* More: The Battle of Berkeley announces the arrival of a genuine right Wing
Movement*

No comments: