Prosecutors will be asked to focus on a male suspect's past behavior in
other relationships to find relevant evidence.
& # 8212; Britain's Telegraph reporting on the horrific rape prosecutions
changes in UK
Scraping rock bottom has taken on new meaning twisted in trials for Western
rape. Why? Because Britain's Crown Attorney (CPS) allows prosecutors to use
evidence from a man of previous sexual relationships with women to try to
convict him of raping a completely different woman. Our favorite witch
hunter, head SPC Alison Saunders, is again.
Even when men are convicted, the rape trial are quite remarkable for the
extreme rarity of objective evidence that they provide. Unlike, for
example, the case of burglary, which typically have a more concrete
evidence such as CCTV images or fingerprints, rape allegations still he
said, she said battle on the testimony of the accuser , which is close to
100% anonymous time, and the accused.
Alison Saunders.
With the existence of evidence worthy of belief already in doubt the
fairness of the accused in many cases exterminated due to the admission of
the allegations, even more tenuous, of bad behavior or control and coercion
of previous relationships with other women.
Bad breaks may be the norm these days, and it is likely that a man will be
a number of sexual partners before he can not stand, let alone ever wants
to see.
An accuser's sexual history is generally inadmissible
changes reduce prosecution sufficient evidence requests and allowing women
to go out unsubstantiated claims.
Alison Saunders, and a number of hacks reported by the media that these
changes are the result of women's own history accusers being immersed in
during rape trials. The exoneration of footballer Evans Ched falsely
accused is the only one of these cases really be cited. Yet these excuses
to further dilute the standard of proof for conviction are only & # 8212;
excuses.
In the debacle Evans Ched, special permission had to be granted for the
accusing woman spent looking at the new trial. A general prohibition exists
against the use of a woman's sexual history in court because of the
terrible name rape shield laws. The practical implication of this is that a
woman can experience the different buyer's remorse promiscuity and cry rape
against a man, while claiming that it is not the kind of girl to engage in
casual sex. The absence of real evidence requirement makes these
allegations advantageous to hide female infidelity.
Also, if a woman's sexual history were really admissible, the authorities
would go to the trouble of naming the side of the accused. This would allow
a thorough discussion about his antecedence. After all, the man accused of
history is debated ad nauseam and defamatory manner by traditional media
and social media. Nevertheless, a girl is almost always anonymous and the
man she accuses is almost always named.
If the evidence of the accuser is already bad and nonexistent, and how
non-existing evidence of former girlfriends to be?
Wow, what a great proof for rape in 2017 & # 8211; ex-girlfriend it was
five or ten years.
Moreover, how relevant? An ex-boyfriend told his girlfriend he didn t want
her to go clubbing without him. Of course, it is quite normal that a man
wouldn t want his wife to places where other people will probably try to
grind against her ass or makeup with it. Three and a bad break later,
however, and most of the time a woman will show such behavior. The control
and coercion
Even more puzzling how a man & # 8220 exposed; & # 8221 misdeeds; with old
flames collapsed on an allegation of rape involving a completely different
girl for a long time later. So he's said to have raised his voice over the
arguments in 2014 & # 8211; what the heck does this have to do with rape in
2017? Obviously, feminists think it has a lot to do with it. But for people
interested in the cause and effect, not to mention solid legal proceedings,
if a man goes to prison for years should be determined by proof that a
particular thing happened at one time, not s' he's on good terms with women
from his past.
will even defamed exonerated men for life because of these changes
Prison or not, men affected by these changes will be branded as guilty for
life.
Since their names remained on the public record for years before these
changes, the situation of men exonerated by the courts was pretty bad. It
will get worse with the new prosecution of rape center. Using character
assassins as former jilted girlfriends lovers and / or bitter will further
solidify the lifetime value of s stigma facing all men taken by Western
judicial systems on unsupported claims sexual assault.
And then the absolute hell for men & # 8221 found guilty. condemnation
quotas for sexual offenses are on the agenda in 2017. The amount of men
convicted, not the quality of the evidence to convict them, is what
matters. To obtain the necessary figures, the standards of evidence
perverse as factoring in the views of your ex-girlfriends are from the
world of gossip and piled in this are intended to be fair criminal trials
and based on facts. In other words, don t Bang Britain.
Read more: The #MeToo campaign does not meet Compares texts a girl of
raping her
No comments:
Post a Comment