Via Daily Mail:
Hundreds of people were injured when riot police closed the polling
stations on the day of the referendum on independence in Catalonia
controversial.
Officers were seen punching and kicking protesters as they stormed the
buildings and seized ballot boxes.
Footage captured in the village of Ter Sarria in Girona Province showed the
authorities with an ax to break the doors of a polling station where
Catalan President Carles Puigdemont was due to vote.
Spanish fire rubber bullets police to voters today in #CatalanReferendum. #
#Catalonia #Cataluyna pic.twitter.com/O8o4b0UlCG 1o
& Mdash; WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 1, 2017
And in Barcelona, the region's capital, officers fired rubber bullets at
thousands of protesters demonstrating against their denied voting.
At least 460 people were injured in clashes across Catalonia, the city's
mayor said, while Spain's Interior Ministry said at least 11 policemen were
injured.
And tens of thousands of fans have been banned from attending football
match FC Barcelona to Las Palmas as part of a protest against violence.
Spain's Constitutional Court suspended the referendum and the central
government says it is illegal.
But regional separatist leaders pledged to keep anyway and called the
region's 5.3million voters to show up to vote.
Spanish national police strike with batons Catalan firefighters trying to
protect voters today & # 39; referendum. #referendumCAT # O1
pic.twitter.com/OcbAhXctTI
& Mdash; WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 1, 2017
Today, M. Puidgemont condemned the Spanish government's repression. He
said: & # 8216; Police brutality shame forever the Spanish state.
But the Spanish Deputy Prime Minister Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría said that
officers in Catalonia act & # 8216; proportionately & # 8217;.
She added that the Catalan government & # 8216; featured with absolute
irresponsibility by going ahead with the referendum.
Shocking images of Barcelona shows police throwing down a staircase voters
and trampling people as they attacked a polling station.
Read the article here
Don t Miss: Spanish policy is crushed For Questioning Feminist Dogma
Sunday, October 1, 2017
Men who still watch the NFL are suckers
The football team or teams that you see on TV or at the stadium aren t your
team. The truth is you do not personally know any of them. & # 8221 Your;
the team is actually owned by millionaire businessmen who are in the
business of making money, your money. These people don t have done your
best interests in mind when they do anything or take any decision. It is
not the priority to meet you or even necessarily entertained unless it
makes them money.
The Steelers hat you bought to show support for your team had the benefit
gained from it distributed on 32 teams in the league. It feeds the whole
machine, one of the strangers who donate know or care about you. You're
stupid mouth portfolio breathing for them. The truth is that all this is a
great money and waste time for you and your family.
Whenever you go to a game, a song in a game, or even click on the articles
related to the game, you feed directly or indirectly the machine and make
more income for the big cats. Unplug it. Ask yourself the following
questions. What difference is it that these people do? How it affects me
directly? Chances are the answers that it makes no difference and it does
not affect me at all.
Drinking more than these crappy beer
The subliminal message
Ever wonder why when you think of football, it is almost synonymous with
drinking beer and eating food that is terrible for your health? Every
commercial break is filled with food commercials and fast beer. Me and the
guys are watching the big game drinking beer after beer and eating our
faces with hot wings and pizza. This is what real men do?
No, my friends, that's what guys like that do. I have absolutely nothing in
common with men like that. It has happened before in the Roman Empire, the
elites would put on events and give free bread in the hope of keeping
people entertained and oblivious to the corruption of their leaders. Take a
look at what is happening in modern times. His eerily similar appearance,
he doesn? And why not sprinkle in feminism in a sport look every man and
you accept it.
The NFL is a waste of time
It seems that the older I get, time passes faster. Material goods, jobs and
money come and go. Almost everything is replaceable. The only thing that is
not replaceable is time. You only here for a while and you're gone, your
children are only little for a short time and then they're adults. Time is
precious, so be careful when you go yours.
The NFL, NBA, NCAA, etc. are huge distractions to keep you weak and stupid.
It affects more so than others. I challenge you to do: turn off your
television and electronics. Sit quietly and close your eyes. Take a few
deep breaths, in and out. Now look around. Breathe and relax. It's your
life. This is where you are in your life. All the circumstances and the
decision that led you to where you are right now. This is your life and s
ending one second at a time. While you're bitching about who sat anthem or
how officials blew the call, the millionaire politicians and businessmen
get richer and more importantly keep you distracted from what really
happens in behind the scenes.
Forget that sat for hoping that your team improves this year or out of
season and improve. Support and learn a new hobby, practice martial arts,
weight lifting, start this diet you talked to in years. You will be
surprised how much you can accomplish and improve without annoying
distractions in life as you are televised sport.
No better time to jump off the NFL for the good
No matter what your position is, the point of kneeling during the national
anthem aims to achieve an increase in people and care about the NFL. That's
exactly what he's doing. I compare the recent events in the NFL for a woman
to test his undisciplined shit man, with the NFL being the wife and the
fans being the man. How can I get with it and support me again? How can I
get with people and fork more money and time?
The best solution is if it bothers you disconnect. hit them where it hurts
most, their wallets. I unplugged the distraction it two years ago and I
have not looked back. Now I have more time with family and focusing on
self-improvement. I urge everyone reading this to do the same.
Read more: Stop Watching Sports
team. The truth is you do not personally know any of them. & # 8221 Your;
the team is actually owned by millionaire businessmen who are in the
business of making money, your money. These people don t have done your
best interests in mind when they do anything or take any decision. It is
not the priority to meet you or even necessarily entertained unless it
makes them money.
The Steelers hat you bought to show support for your team had the benefit
gained from it distributed on 32 teams in the league. It feeds the whole
machine, one of the strangers who donate know or care about you. You're
stupid mouth portfolio breathing for them. The truth is that all this is a
great money and waste time for you and your family.
Whenever you go to a game, a song in a game, or even click on the articles
related to the game, you feed directly or indirectly the machine and make
more income for the big cats. Unplug it. Ask yourself the following
questions. What difference is it that these people do? How it affects me
directly? Chances are the answers that it makes no difference and it does
not affect me at all.
Drinking more than these crappy beer
The subliminal message
Ever wonder why when you think of football, it is almost synonymous with
drinking beer and eating food that is terrible for your health? Every
commercial break is filled with food commercials and fast beer. Me and the
guys are watching the big game drinking beer after beer and eating our
faces with hot wings and pizza. This is what real men do?
No, my friends, that's what guys like that do. I have absolutely nothing in
common with men like that. It has happened before in the Roman Empire, the
elites would put on events and give free bread in the hope of keeping
people entertained and oblivious to the corruption of their leaders. Take a
look at what is happening in modern times. His eerily similar appearance,
he doesn? And why not sprinkle in feminism in a sport look every man and
you accept it.
The NFL is a waste of time
It seems that the older I get, time passes faster. Material goods, jobs and
money come and go. Almost everything is replaceable. The only thing that is
not replaceable is time. You only here for a while and you're gone, your
children are only little for a short time and then they're adults. Time is
precious, so be careful when you go yours.
The NFL, NBA, NCAA, etc. are huge distractions to keep you weak and stupid.
It affects more so than others. I challenge you to do: turn off your
television and electronics. Sit quietly and close your eyes. Take a few
deep breaths, in and out. Now look around. Breathe and relax. It's your
life. This is where you are in your life. All the circumstances and the
decision that led you to where you are right now. This is your life and s
ending one second at a time. While you're bitching about who sat anthem or
how officials blew the call, the millionaire politicians and businessmen
get richer and more importantly keep you distracted from what really
happens in behind the scenes.
Forget that sat for hoping that your team improves this year or out of
season and improve. Support and learn a new hobby, practice martial arts,
weight lifting, start this diet you talked to in years. You will be
surprised how much you can accomplish and improve without annoying
distractions in life as you are televised sport.
No better time to jump off the NFL for the good
No matter what your position is, the point of kneeling during the national
anthem aims to achieve an increase in people and care about the NFL. That's
exactly what he's doing. I compare the recent events in the NFL for a woman
to test his undisciplined shit man, with the NFL being the wife and the
fans being the man. How can I get with it and support me again? How can I
get with people and fork more money and time?
The best solution is if it bothers you disconnect. hit them where it hurts
most, their wallets. I unplugged the distraction it two years ago and I
have not looked back. Now I have more time with family and focusing on
self-improvement. I urge everyone reading this to do the same.
Read more: Stop Watching Sports
Saturday, September 30, 2017
The Great Siege of Malta
The soldiers of the Ottoman Empire were sent Sept. 11, 1565 in what became
known as "The Great Siege of Malta". They were humiliated and forced to
withdraw from what was supposed to be an epic campaign of conquest for the
greater glory of Allah, the Compassionate. Is it a coincidence that Islamic
terrorists have chosen the same date to destroy the Twin Towers in New York?
Let's start from the beginning. The Knights of St. John, or Hospitallier
knights were originally a religious order founded in the 12th century in
the Holy Land. Their mission was to care for pilgrims who entered the Holy
Land, and defend against any threat to the perilous road to Jerusalem. They
were religious as well as military, created under a papal charter, which
means they have responded to anyone but the pope.
Fast forward four centuries. The Knights always lead an endless struggle
against the forces of Islam. The Crusades were ancient history. People had
all but forgotten. The Knights of St. John were regarded as outdated relics
of a bygone era. Other levels of crusaders, like the Templars, had been
missing for over two centuries.
The Knights of St. John were forced to leave their fortress in Rhodes in
1522, and for some time homeless, until they claimed the island of Malta,
which was given to them by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, grand-son
Fernando of Aragon (the model for Machiavelli a rule in "the Prince").
Fernando had expelled the Moors from Spain after eight centuries of
invasion, and Charles V himself led a constant struggle against the
crescent and star.
The Grand Master of the Order of St John, Jean Parisot de la Valette, 71 at
the time. He had a personal interest against Muslims, having been a knight
since he was 18 years old, participating in battles against Islam
throughout his life. His family had served in five different Crusades, with
distinction, and he was raised with stories of their epic bravery. He had
been defeated and expelled from Rhodes years earlier, and had even been a
convict to Muslims for a year, rowing up to 20 hours a day, before escaping
and vowing revenge.
The Knights survived by raiding the trade routes of the Ottoman navy and
basically make life impossible for the Turks. Knights were hardened
warriors, great sailors, and the godly. Most of them were the 2nd or 3rd
son of the aristocracy, refined nobility without inheritance. They were
considered the most formidable fighting force in Europe, and were indeed
elite in every sense.
Suleiman Desire
Since its founding in the 7th century, Islam had wanted an achievement:
invade Europe. These primitive, barbaric desert remains had spent most of
their history killing each other until Mohammed united them against a
common enemy of Western civilization.
The Turkish leader, Suleiman "the Magnificent" was the most powerful man
alive. His empire was ridiculously large, from Vienna to Babylon all the
way to Aden, in the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula. His titles
included vice-regent of God on earth, the Lord of the East and West Lords,
and even neck Possessor of men, for he beheaded nearly all who displeased
him. But alas, such a rule is not enough. He had set his sights on Europe,
and there was no force on earth powerful enough to stop it. Or so he
thought ...
The Knights of St. John had been a thorn in his side long enough. They were
massively effective for disabling the Turkish operations of their new home
in Malta, attacked Ottoman ships at sea. These Western pirates were led by
the intrepid Romegas, a legendary knight who joined the order at age 15,
and close friend of Valletta. Romegas was considered one of the greatest
sailors of his time. He took much booty and several prisoners of high rank
on his raids on the sea and Suleiman enough. He decided to crush the Order
of the Knights, once and for all.
Assemble a massive army of 48,000 men aboard 200 ships, including the
elite, scimitar wielding janissaries called "Invincible" and layalars
junkies who wore the skins of wild beasts in combat. Their only concern in
life was to kill Christians and die a glorious death to be able to enter
heaven and enjoy 72 virgins promised by their prophet.
Who was their opposition? A simple force of 700 knights, who watched over a
small barren island. Certainly they were no match for the vice-reactive of
God on Earth. In March 1565, the planned Muslim fleet, determined to
destroy the Western world and subjugate Europe under the heel of Islam
forever.
Alone and surrounded
Surely enough, the intelligence of Valletta he warned against the impending
Apocalypse, sailing quickly directly to him and his brave knights. He sent
messengers to all European kings, asking for help against the darkness
ahead. No answer except one: Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire. A bulwark
against Islam legendary Charles promised assistance if they could hold out
long enough. For now, it seemed, were the knights themselves.
The island of Malta were three main strongholds: The fortress of St.
Angelo, St. Michael and newly built St Elmo, on the peninsula of Mount
Sciberras. Both of them were solid structures, and even if they are nothing
compared to their original fortifications on the island of Rhodes, they
would have to do. Valletta has designed a strategy for better defense they
could, but the situation was quite dark knights.
Malta's fortifications
There were 700 knights defending the island, and about 8000 Maltese
soldiers. Valletta has vowed that there would be no retreat, no surrender.
They met in a final prayer and prepares to attack. It is said that after
the prayer, any weakness disappeared from their heart, and small
animosities them were dissolved. The power of faith has made its presence
felt.
Valletta, himself a man of deep faith, reportedly said:
It is the great battle of the Cross and the Qur'an is now fighting. A
formidable army of infidels are about to invade our island. We, for our
part, we are the chosen soldiers of the Cross, and if Heaven requires the
sacrifice of our lives, there is no better opportunity than this.
He knew it was not a fight he would win with brute force, if necessary.
Cunning, faith and courage to be its survival tools.
The Onslaught begins
The first attack by the Ottomans was St Elmo. artillery fire and relentless
waves of aggression against the Ottomans rained down on defenders. At 100
knights and 500 soldiers held the fort. They were ordered to fight to the
last man. The Turks were convinced that they could take the fort in three
days. Yet after weeks, the defenders were still struggling on.
The defenders were quite ingenious, and developed all kinds of incendiary
devices. They developed a primitive hand grenade made of a clay pot filled
with the famous Greek fire, a napalm-like substance. They threw these into
their opponents with devastating effects: the shrapnel would explode and
damage enemies by the dozen.
Knights invented large hoops of fire, wooden rings wrapped in layers of
flammable materials, such as brandy, turpentine, gunpowder, and the fabric,
they are ignited and be rolled downhill toward the Turks hundreds.
They also invented the Trump, a long hollow tube filled with flammable
sulfur resin and linseed oil which, when lit, will breathe fire several
meters away for as long as half an hour. Knights use these primitives to
strategic flamethrower of choke points, which will hold any advances by
attackers. The Turks wore long robes, to be fired was quite devastating for
them.
After weeks of fighting and bombarded the defenders were malnourished,
deprived of sleep, and disfigured as to be unrecognizable. Many were
seriously injured, limping and bandaged in improvised tissue, but their
conviction is unwavering. They have received reinforcements and supplies
from the main fort of Sant'Angelo, with the message of their Grand Master
fight to the death.
To make matters worse, the arrival of Drajut, known among his people
as "the sword of Islam" and "the scourge of the Christians," invigorated
Turkish forces. He brought another 1500 his elite warriors. The bombardment
continued, and the Turks kept trying to charge into the castle. Soon, a
cannon burst Drajut injured. He was dragged out of his tent. The sword of
Islam had met his end. Morale in the Turkish army began to falter.
Furious, Mustapha Pasha, commander now ordered the fort surrounded by all
the Turkish fleet. The biggest of their guns were moved forward, and the
defenders were pounded relentlessly. This brought together, said their
prayers, and defiantly spelled the end of the chapel for a last time. Those
who could not bear sat on chairs, well armed, their souls to their Lord
Jesus commended.
The Turks flocked and finally defenders were defeated. They were all
massacred and Red Crescent Suleiman was set up the flag of the Knights of
St. John. But they trembled because across the bay was larger and much more
impressive St Angelo. It took them four weeks to invade the smaller
fortress, and had lost about 10,000 men.
Terror Tactics
Mustapha Pasha knew he had to break the spirit of the defenders, because he
had seen how their bodies could resist. So he ordered the knight commanders
died as beheaded. Their heads were put on pikes, and their decapitated
bodies were sailed in the bay to the remaining defenders, attached to the
top of the crude wooden cross, a mockery of their faith. Valletta responded
in kind. He ordered the Turkish prisoners beheaded, and pulled his head
through the window with their biggest cannon. The message was clear: no
retreat, no surrender.
The bombing began. There were relentlessly shelling the fortress, and the
south side attack. The Turks were determined to take this small piece of
land. Mustapha was master planned: while the Christians were busy defending
the south side, ten large ships with 1,000 elite Janissaries would assault
the northern end, but Valletta had prepared for this eventuality. He left
Knight Guiral battery with a 5-gun at the base of the fort. He could hardly
believe his eyes that the Turks sailed right into his trap.
A perfect beach, he ordered his men to open fire. Nine of the 10 boats were
destroyed, 800 Janissaries sunk in water on site. One ship left, and the
frightened look in their eyes sent fear into the heart of Muslims. The
defenders opened the door and loaded on, and overwhelmed the attackers who
ran for their lives. St Angelo survived another day.
Mustapha surrounded the fortress, and continued to bombard Christians. For
over a week, all Turkish cannons thundered on defensive positions. The
shelling could be heard from Sicily, over 20 miles (100 km) away, and the
people there were amazed that any man could survive such a hell.
The Turks renewed their attack and flocked from all sides. The victory
would be theirs in the end, it would seem. They breached the walls, but
ended up on a second layer of fortifications. Cannon fire rained on them,
and they were locked in a very effective death trap. After some time,
residents were jumping their defensive positions and forced the Turks to
retreat. Again, they were defeated.
Many times the attackers breached the walls, but they have always been met
effectively to these funneling slaughtering areas, with a wall of sharp
organized Pikes and fire musket eager to greet them. Valletta grabbed his
spear and led the charge several times to repel the attackers. Despite his
advanced age, he was a brave and skilled fighter. The sight of their main
leader of the attack, has inspired the Knights to hold the wave after wave
of Turkish attackers on several occasions when all hope seemed lost.
God's will
The death toll was catastrophic for the Muslims. The disease was endemic in
their ranks, the corpses of friends and rotten enemies all around them.
Their supplies were short, including gunpowder. Over 130,000 cannonballs
were fired Maltese defenders in total. The summer heat was burning and the
water on the island had been poisoned by residents before retreating. Their
morale was fading. Rumors spread the commander of the tent, soldiers
whisper It is certainly not Allah's will that we take this forsaken island
& # 8221.
They tried all kinds of tricks to destroy the defenders. They tried to dig
tunnels, but the Knights collapsed mines of their own, and sent soldiers to
repel the charge of the tunnel.
Then Mustapha prepared its siege tower, a huge juggernaut, larger than even
the ramparts of the fortress, to invade. But Valletta ordered his men to
remove the stone from the base of the walls, and shot the tower with huge
guns, containing two cannon balls held together by a chain. The strategy
was overwhelmingly effective and completely destroyed the tower. Supporters
cheered by seeing the Turks by jumping from the craft collapse, oil and
spitting fire on their own ranks.
Winter was coming, and victory seemed nowhere in sight for attackers.
Mustapha ordered his men to take the walled city of Mdina neighbor. His
army was approaching, but was greeted by heavily armed soldiers manning the
walls of cannons. "A second St Elmo !! "Shouted the soldiers, in their
retirement. But that was all a ploy, the governor, sensing the turn of
events, ordered civilians, women and children, to man the walls, clad in
armor and carrying pikes.
In another attempt to destroy the attackers, the Turkish forces gathered a
huge bomb, packed with gunpowder and shot, and rolled in the Christian
positions. The latter replied, rolling the diabolical device back at them,
causing a spectacular explosion. Hundreds died.
The Knights did not show much tolerance with the Muslim invaders,
Hello
Finally, after all hope of salvation was gone from the heart of the
defense, a relief force was in sight. More than 10 000 men in 28 ships had
arrived; soldiers from all over Europe, inspired by the courage of these
knights had joined the fight. Even then, they were heavily outnumbered by
the Turks. Mustapha ordered his men to load against the relief force, but
they have been severely weakened after months of fighting and endemic
disease.
In the Pit style Helm, the Christian relief force loaded in the heart of
the Turkish army, completely destroying the Turks. It was a bloodbath;
Muslims were massacred, hunted throughout the island and picked off. They
scrambled to get on board their ships and leave. It was a landslide victory.
Of the 48,000 invaders who first put the veil to terrorize Europe, only
10,000 have come home. Knights suffered heavy losses, too, but
miraculously, the victory was theirs. Their sacrifice was immense; the
Western world owes these men more than we'll never know. If not for them,
Europe would have been converted long ago, and we would most likely Arabic
(and sodomized a young age).
Knights looking ramparts that their enemies are crushed
Both Romegas and Valletta survived the fighting. After the siege, the
knights were hailed throughout Europe and the hailed as heroes. They had
heard stories of their legendary exploits, load the face of seemingly
insurmountable obstacles, and were inspired. Many donations were made
knights, and with them, the citadel was built Valetta, in honor of the
Grand Master La Valette. The pope sent his best engineers and the city was
planned and designed as a solid fortress before it's time to defend
Christianity against future attacks.
Their victory had a profound impact throughout Europe. The local princes
realized that the only way to defeat Islam was to stop the war between them
and unite against the common threat. This has resulted in a large fighting
force than seven years later, the Turks crushed again at Lepanto, ending
the superiority of the Ottoman sea forever. Romegas was once again in the
front line of this battle.
Romegas died a few years later in Rome, after a life long struggle against
Islam at every turn. Valletta was offered the position of cardinal, but he
refused. The sword was the only way he had known all his life. He led the
Malta reconstruction and died a peaceful death, only a few years later in
1568. But the tales of their heroic acts would last for centuries to come.
This would come to be known as the last epic encounter between Crusaders
and Knights of Islam.
Victory
Conclusion
There are lessons to be learned from these events. It is said that those
who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it. Valletta and his
knights were considered obsolete fossil useless by their contemporaries.
Many people have met the Knights of St. John, but most made fun of their
traditions and way of life to the old.
But the Knights knew in their heart the truth. They did not let public
opinion sway their beliefs. They did not follow the rest of the civilized
world in the descent to ignorance, decadence and madness forgetting what it
is that makes us great. Their faith and their traditions were sacred to
them. They kept watch in silence for years, until fate has finally called.
I invite you, the reader colleagues to do the same. Forget political
correctness and opinions of the masses. Search your heart to the truth.
Meditate, you isolate is offline madness of the modern world. Take some
time for yourself, get in touch with nature, and in turn, your own nature.
Then you begin to see the truth. In the silence of your mind, you will find
the answers.
It took only 700 of these knights to save Europe. Now, Europe is
threatened, this time from the inside as well as foreign invaders. Maybe
there will be awake enough, pilled red souls to stem the barbarian invasion.
Let us prepare ourselves and we are strengthening. Maybe destiny call us
for the journey of a hero. Meanwhile, we'll see what we can do to preserve
our ancestral lands and traditions. Do not let the sacrifice of the brave
Malta to be in vain. Strong men are needed now more than ever.
Read more: Clash Of Steel and Wills: The story of the Battle of Lepanto
known as "The Great Siege of Malta". They were humiliated and forced to
withdraw from what was supposed to be an epic campaign of conquest for the
greater glory of Allah, the Compassionate. Is it a coincidence that Islamic
terrorists have chosen the same date to destroy the Twin Towers in New York?
Let's start from the beginning. The Knights of St. John, or Hospitallier
knights were originally a religious order founded in the 12th century in
the Holy Land. Their mission was to care for pilgrims who entered the Holy
Land, and defend against any threat to the perilous road to Jerusalem. They
were religious as well as military, created under a papal charter, which
means they have responded to anyone but the pope.
Fast forward four centuries. The Knights always lead an endless struggle
against the forces of Islam. The Crusades were ancient history. People had
all but forgotten. The Knights of St. John were regarded as outdated relics
of a bygone era. Other levels of crusaders, like the Templars, had been
missing for over two centuries.
The Knights of St. John were forced to leave their fortress in Rhodes in
1522, and for some time homeless, until they claimed the island of Malta,
which was given to them by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, grand-son
Fernando of Aragon (the model for Machiavelli a rule in "the Prince").
Fernando had expelled the Moors from Spain after eight centuries of
invasion, and Charles V himself led a constant struggle against the
crescent and star.
The Grand Master of the Order of St John, Jean Parisot de la Valette, 71 at
the time. He had a personal interest against Muslims, having been a knight
since he was 18 years old, participating in battles against Islam
throughout his life. His family had served in five different Crusades, with
distinction, and he was raised with stories of their epic bravery. He had
been defeated and expelled from Rhodes years earlier, and had even been a
convict to Muslims for a year, rowing up to 20 hours a day, before escaping
and vowing revenge.
The Knights survived by raiding the trade routes of the Ottoman navy and
basically make life impossible for the Turks. Knights were hardened
warriors, great sailors, and the godly. Most of them were the 2nd or 3rd
son of the aristocracy, refined nobility without inheritance. They were
considered the most formidable fighting force in Europe, and were indeed
elite in every sense.
Suleiman Desire
Since its founding in the 7th century, Islam had wanted an achievement:
invade Europe. These primitive, barbaric desert remains had spent most of
their history killing each other until Mohammed united them against a
common enemy of Western civilization.
The Turkish leader, Suleiman "the Magnificent" was the most powerful man
alive. His empire was ridiculously large, from Vienna to Babylon all the
way to Aden, in the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula. His titles
included vice-regent of God on earth, the Lord of the East and West Lords,
and even neck Possessor of men, for he beheaded nearly all who displeased
him. But alas, such a rule is not enough. He had set his sights on Europe,
and there was no force on earth powerful enough to stop it. Or so he
thought ...
The Knights of St. John had been a thorn in his side long enough. They were
massively effective for disabling the Turkish operations of their new home
in Malta, attacked Ottoman ships at sea. These Western pirates were led by
the intrepid Romegas, a legendary knight who joined the order at age 15,
and close friend of Valletta. Romegas was considered one of the greatest
sailors of his time. He took much booty and several prisoners of high rank
on his raids on the sea and Suleiman enough. He decided to crush the Order
of the Knights, once and for all.
Assemble a massive army of 48,000 men aboard 200 ships, including the
elite, scimitar wielding janissaries called "Invincible" and layalars
junkies who wore the skins of wild beasts in combat. Their only concern in
life was to kill Christians and die a glorious death to be able to enter
heaven and enjoy 72 virgins promised by their prophet.
Who was their opposition? A simple force of 700 knights, who watched over a
small barren island. Certainly they were no match for the vice-reactive of
God on Earth. In March 1565, the planned Muslim fleet, determined to
destroy the Western world and subjugate Europe under the heel of Islam
forever.
Alone and surrounded
Surely enough, the intelligence of Valletta he warned against the impending
Apocalypse, sailing quickly directly to him and his brave knights. He sent
messengers to all European kings, asking for help against the darkness
ahead. No answer except one: Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire. A bulwark
against Islam legendary Charles promised assistance if they could hold out
long enough. For now, it seemed, were the knights themselves.
The island of Malta were three main strongholds: The fortress of St.
Angelo, St. Michael and newly built St Elmo, on the peninsula of Mount
Sciberras. Both of them were solid structures, and even if they are nothing
compared to their original fortifications on the island of Rhodes, they
would have to do. Valletta has designed a strategy for better defense they
could, but the situation was quite dark knights.
Malta's fortifications
There were 700 knights defending the island, and about 8000 Maltese
soldiers. Valletta has vowed that there would be no retreat, no surrender.
They met in a final prayer and prepares to attack. It is said that after
the prayer, any weakness disappeared from their heart, and small
animosities them were dissolved. The power of faith has made its presence
felt.
Valletta, himself a man of deep faith, reportedly said:
It is the great battle of the Cross and the Qur'an is now fighting. A
formidable army of infidels are about to invade our island. We, for our
part, we are the chosen soldiers of the Cross, and if Heaven requires the
sacrifice of our lives, there is no better opportunity than this.
He knew it was not a fight he would win with brute force, if necessary.
Cunning, faith and courage to be its survival tools.
The Onslaught begins
The first attack by the Ottomans was St Elmo. artillery fire and relentless
waves of aggression against the Ottomans rained down on defenders. At 100
knights and 500 soldiers held the fort. They were ordered to fight to the
last man. The Turks were convinced that they could take the fort in three
days. Yet after weeks, the defenders were still struggling on.
The defenders were quite ingenious, and developed all kinds of incendiary
devices. They developed a primitive hand grenade made of a clay pot filled
with the famous Greek fire, a napalm-like substance. They threw these into
their opponents with devastating effects: the shrapnel would explode and
damage enemies by the dozen.
Knights invented large hoops of fire, wooden rings wrapped in layers of
flammable materials, such as brandy, turpentine, gunpowder, and the fabric,
they are ignited and be rolled downhill toward the Turks hundreds.
They also invented the Trump, a long hollow tube filled with flammable
sulfur resin and linseed oil which, when lit, will breathe fire several
meters away for as long as half an hour. Knights use these primitives to
strategic flamethrower of choke points, which will hold any advances by
attackers. The Turks wore long robes, to be fired was quite devastating for
them.
After weeks of fighting and bombarded the defenders were malnourished,
deprived of sleep, and disfigured as to be unrecognizable. Many were
seriously injured, limping and bandaged in improvised tissue, but their
conviction is unwavering. They have received reinforcements and supplies
from the main fort of Sant'Angelo, with the message of their Grand Master
fight to the death.
To make matters worse, the arrival of Drajut, known among his people
as "the sword of Islam" and "the scourge of the Christians," invigorated
Turkish forces. He brought another 1500 his elite warriors. The bombardment
continued, and the Turks kept trying to charge into the castle. Soon, a
cannon burst Drajut injured. He was dragged out of his tent. The sword of
Islam had met his end. Morale in the Turkish army began to falter.
Furious, Mustapha Pasha, commander now ordered the fort surrounded by all
the Turkish fleet. The biggest of their guns were moved forward, and the
defenders were pounded relentlessly. This brought together, said their
prayers, and defiantly spelled the end of the chapel for a last time. Those
who could not bear sat on chairs, well armed, their souls to their Lord
Jesus commended.
The Turks flocked and finally defenders were defeated. They were all
massacred and Red Crescent Suleiman was set up the flag of the Knights of
St. John. But they trembled because across the bay was larger and much more
impressive St Angelo. It took them four weeks to invade the smaller
fortress, and had lost about 10,000 men.
Terror Tactics
Mustapha Pasha knew he had to break the spirit of the defenders, because he
had seen how their bodies could resist. So he ordered the knight commanders
died as beheaded. Their heads were put on pikes, and their decapitated
bodies were sailed in the bay to the remaining defenders, attached to the
top of the crude wooden cross, a mockery of their faith. Valletta responded
in kind. He ordered the Turkish prisoners beheaded, and pulled his head
through the window with their biggest cannon. The message was clear: no
retreat, no surrender.
The bombing began. There were relentlessly shelling the fortress, and the
south side attack. The Turks were determined to take this small piece of
land. Mustapha was master planned: while the Christians were busy defending
the south side, ten large ships with 1,000 elite Janissaries would assault
the northern end, but Valletta had prepared for this eventuality. He left
Knight Guiral battery with a 5-gun at the base of the fort. He could hardly
believe his eyes that the Turks sailed right into his trap.
A perfect beach, he ordered his men to open fire. Nine of the 10 boats were
destroyed, 800 Janissaries sunk in water on site. One ship left, and the
frightened look in their eyes sent fear into the heart of Muslims. The
defenders opened the door and loaded on, and overwhelmed the attackers who
ran for their lives. St Angelo survived another day.
Mustapha surrounded the fortress, and continued to bombard Christians. For
over a week, all Turkish cannons thundered on defensive positions. The
shelling could be heard from Sicily, over 20 miles (100 km) away, and the
people there were amazed that any man could survive such a hell.
The Turks renewed their attack and flocked from all sides. The victory
would be theirs in the end, it would seem. They breached the walls, but
ended up on a second layer of fortifications. Cannon fire rained on them,
and they were locked in a very effective death trap. After some time,
residents were jumping their defensive positions and forced the Turks to
retreat. Again, they were defeated.
Many times the attackers breached the walls, but they have always been met
effectively to these funneling slaughtering areas, with a wall of sharp
organized Pikes and fire musket eager to greet them. Valletta grabbed his
spear and led the charge several times to repel the attackers. Despite his
advanced age, he was a brave and skilled fighter. The sight of their main
leader of the attack, has inspired the Knights to hold the wave after wave
of Turkish attackers on several occasions when all hope seemed lost.
God's will
The death toll was catastrophic for the Muslims. The disease was endemic in
their ranks, the corpses of friends and rotten enemies all around them.
Their supplies were short, including gunpowder. Over 130,000 cannonballs
were fired Maltese defenders in total. The summer heat was burning and the
water on the island had been poisoned by residents before retreating. Their
morale was fading. Rumors spread the commander of the tent, soldiers
whisper It is certainly not Allah's will that we take this forsaken island
& # 8221.
They tried all kinds of tricks to destroy the defenders. They tried to dig
tunnels, but the Knights collapsed mines of their own, and sent soldiers to
repel the charge of the tunnel.
Then Mustapha prepared its siege tower, a huge juggernaut, larger than even
the ramparts of the fortress, to invade. But Valletta ordered his men to
remove the stone from the base of the walls, and shot the tower with huge
guns, containing two cannon balls held together by a chain. The strategy
was overwhelmingly effective and completely destroyed the tower. Supporters
cheered by seeing the Turks by jumping from the craft collapse, oil and
spitting fire on their own ranks.
Winter was coming, and victory seemed nowhere in sight for attackers.
Mustapha ordered his men to take the walled city of Mdina neighbor. His
army was approaching, but was greeted by heavily armed soldiers manning the
walls of cannons. "A second St Elmo !! "Shouted the soldiers, in their
retirement. But that was all a ploy, the governor, sensing the turn of
events, ordered civilians, women and children, to man the walls, clad in
armor and carrying pikes.
In another attempt to destroy the attackers, the Turkish forces gathered a
huge bomb, packed with gunpowder and shot, and rolled in the Christian
positions. The latter replied, rolling the diabolical device back at them,
causing a spectacular explosion. Hundreds died.
The Knights did not show much tolerance with the Muslim invaders,
Hello
Finally, after all hope of salvation was gone from the heart of the
defense, a relief force was in sight. More than 10 000 men in 28 ships had
arrived; soldiers from all over Europe, inspired by the courage of these
knights had joined the fight. Even then, they were heavily outnumbered by
the Turks. Mustapha ordered his men to load against the relief force, but
they have been severely weakened after months of fighting and endemic
disease.
In the Pit style Helm, the Christian relief force loaded in the heart of
the Turkish army, completely destroying the Turks. It was a bloodbath;
Muslims were massacred, hunted throughout the island and picked off. They
scrambled to get on board their ships and leave. It was a landslide victory.
Of the 48,000 invaders who first put the veil to terrorize Europe, only
10,000 have come home. Knights suffered heavy losses, too, but
miraculously, the victory was theirs. Their sacrifice was immense; the
Western world owes these men more than we'll never know. If not for them,
Europe would have been converted long ago, and we would most likely Arabic
(and sodomized a young age).
Knights looking ramparts that their enemies are crushed
Both Romegas and Valletta survived the fighting. After the siege, the
knights were hailed throughout Europe and the hailed as heroes. They had
heard stories of their legendary exploits, load the face of seemingly
insurmountable obstacles, and were inspired. Many donations were made
knights, and with them, the citadel was built Valetta, in honor of the
Grand Master La Valette. The pope sent his best engineers and the city was
planned and designed as a solid fortress before it's time to defend
Christianity against future attacks.
Their victory had a profound impact throughout Europe. The local princes
realized that the only way to defeat Islam was to stop the war between them
and unite against the common threat. This has resulted in a large fighting
force than seven years later, the Turks crushed again at Lepanto, ending
the superiority of the Ottoman sea forever. Romegas was once again in the
front line of this battle.
Romegas died a few years later in Rome, after a life long struggle against
Islam at every turn. Valletta was offered the position of cardinal, but he
refused. The sword was the only way he had known all his life. He led the
Malta reconstruction and died a peaceful death, only a few years later in
1568. But the tales of their heroic acts would last for centuries to come.
This would come to be known as the last epic encounter between Crusaders
and Knights of Islam.
Victory
Conclusion
There are lessons to be learned from these events. It is said that those
who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it. Valletta and his
knights were considered obsolete fossil useless by their contemporaries.
Many people have met the Knights of St. John, but most made fun of their
traditions and way of life to the old.
But the Knights knew in their heart the truth. They did not let public
opinion sway their beliefs. They did not follow the rest of the civilized
world in the descent to ignorance, decadence and madness forgetting what it
is that makes us great. Their faith and their traditions were sacred to
them. They kept watch in silence for years, until fate has finally called.
I invite you, the reader colleagues to do the same. Forget political
correctness and opinions of the masses. Search your heart to the truth.
Meditate, you isolate is offline madness of the modern world. Take some
time for yourself, get in touch with nature, and in turn, your own nature.
Then you begin to see the truth. In the silence of your mind, you will find
the answers.
It took only 700 of these knights to save Europe. Now, Europe is
threatened, this time from the inside as well as foreign invaders. Maybe
there will be awake enough, pilled red souls to stem the barbarian invasion.
Let us prepare ourselves and we are strengthening. Maybe destiny call us
for the journey of a hero. Meanwhile, we'll see what we can do to preserve
our ancestral lands and traditions. Do not let the sacrifice of the brave
Malta to be in vain. Strong men are needed now more than ever.
Read more: Clash Of Steel and Wills: The story of the Battle of Lepanto
Friday, September 29, 2017
7 books on the power of influence published after the 19th century
Last week, I discussed several books of ancient and modern times on power.
For power is a part of life, something that permeates our choices, our
actions, our judgments, down from the opening we choose among several to
get this particular girl looking up from her smartphone choices career that
could set the mark for the next ten years.
Some left saying "nothing is neutral," because it is all about power. Such
a sweeping statement is grossly exaggerated and reflects an unhealthy
worship of power, it still contains a kernel of truth. Knowing where your
power begins where a rule of legitimate power, and where you can take and
how, is far from clear, and can not be discovered by experience and a long
reflection.
ancient thought is usually wider, fuller, thicker than its modern
counterpart. It seems less like a lecture and more as a support for
meditation. For this reason, if you want to gain wisdom, I urge you to
start with Plato or Aristotle. However, these are not enough. Since these
eminent philosophers pondered the times have changed and we are faced with
challenges of antiquity men did not know & # 8212; or much less. Today, an
important part of what we struggle with is related to money and cultural
conflicts. These aspects are more directly addresses the contemporary books.
As you will see, pioneers in these areas were barely friends. Among these
works, only two out of seven were written by people who could be considered
more or less on our side, with serious doubts stain one of them. If we want
to beat the hollow Empire on its own ground, meeting with his most cunning
agents is necessary, whatever the bitterness of the experience. It is not
as if they had produced the first bittersweet books after all.
Public Opinion 1. Walter Lippmann
"I'm Chesterton without the mustache and the foreskin. Now listen (((me)))
on the way people live misthink ".
Parked in the wake of the Great War by a Jewish journalist, public opinion
says a lot about the "manufacture of consent" before the infamous Noam
Chomsky was born. You know what you are when you crack open the book and
meeting with a quote from the allegory of Plato's cave in full early. To
recall, the allegory of the cave represents the clueless people whose
prospects are limited by blinders and are led to confuse the puppet shadows
with real things.
Public opinion makes a clear distinction between the two types of
individuals: first, the "elite", the "expert", the "specialist" who has
been trained and knows; On the other hand, the ordinary citizen, that is
riddled with bias and prejudice and is part of a "disoriented flock" in
need of direction. The public, mostly in the form of press day after day,
is how the old guides it & # 8212; for his own good, of course. (In a book
on, The Phantom Public, Lippmann double down and draws an even more
scathing picture of the average public Gentile.)
In criticizing the "unregulated" media and how people, when faced with
incomplete or uncertain information are based on assumptions, Lippmann
explains how to manipulate people and justified. It distinguishes between
a "real" world and "pseudo-environment" because of alleged prejudice,
superstition, stereotypes, myths and & # 8212, you may have guessed it & #
8212; social constructs. The cool part, from the perspective of Lippmann,
is that 1) most stupid goyim can not tell the difference between truth
and "social construction", and 2) the pseudo-environment can be
deconstructed, reconstructed and manipulated by those who know it exists
and how to change it.
If you want to trace the roots of false news media on us looming today,
public opinion is playing, provided that you can wear with arrogant remarks
Lippmann on the "boobies" or on the way to be dissected the girl next to a
psychiatrist. By the way, you may notice that hyper-up stuff like the work
of Daniel Kahneman on "through the people" can easily be called in support
of a Lippmannian program.
2. Edward Bernays Propaganda
A nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays would be advertising and discrete
marketing campaigns that Lippman was journalism. Bernays is indeed a
pioneer in the occult influence, indirect advertising, clever use of
symbolism, spinning and other practices that mark under the euphemistic
term "public relations".
Propaganda, the most famous book Bernays says some of these methods, as
well as successful uses, it is done. For example, in 1915, he promoted a
Russian troupe of ballet dancers promoting their colorful costumes in
fashion, pushing opinion articles on dance, and causing American men (troll
bait "are American men ashamed to be gracious? ").
Bernays is best known for his campaign "freedom torch". To expand the
market for cigarettes, he teamed with a psychoanalyst, (((Abraham Brill))),
and corrupt journalists, and together they spun pseudo-spontaneous events
by young women who smoke in public together . roughly Looks like Soros
Femens. More money for tobacco magnates, plus the ability to turn a story
of "progress" for leftists, less moral for everyone.
Bernays also helped President Woodrow Wilson betray his first campaign
promise, namely that the United States will join the Great War, but managed
to have another propagandist, George Creel, scapegoats in his place during
this campaign was exposed as full of lies.
Play propaganda, note how Bernays attempts to justify and regulate & #
8212; # 8212 in words and his own practice. In a democracy, it is necessary
that "our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely
by men we have never heard of. "Well, maybe free speech for everyone
encourages an arms race on the marketplace ideas, but conveniently forgets
Bernays (((that))) began self-promotion and play tough competition at a
time when it was considered trespassing on the territory of someone else.
3. Ayn Rand Atlas Shrugged
Just need an introduction to the American reader, Atlas Shrugged can be
understood as a philosophical tale about the personal and social power. Far
from being the greedy bastards, they are sometimes portrayed as Hank
Rearden, Francesco d'Anconia, Midas Mulligan et al. are heroic characters
with an own code of ethics and sense of integrity. Full of masculine
energy, they follow their calling, are self-controlled and a strong will to
develop the capacities that enable them to thrive and contribute to the
welfare of society. All are virtuous and some, like d'Anconia, are curious
or playful.
Closely woven with the main adventures of the characters is a real sense of
authenticity. Hank Rearden could earn even more money it already
associating with the corrupt government, but it does not. Midas Mulligan
could continue to invest smartly as he does, but he'd rather scuttle his
own empire that bow down to an unfair trial. John Galt could live in a
house he patented his engine as Tesla, but he spent years in a small
apartment, posing as a humble railway worker, so he and others many
successful spirit setting a crazy world turned.
Atlas Shrugged is based on a sharp distinction between external goods, such
as money and social status and internal elements such as integrity and
values. John Galt teaches all of its targets to abandon the old, no matter
the suffering involved, so they can keep it. Only those who have betrayed
their own moral sense to a place within the system, as a former professor
of Galt Robert Stadler, or those who seem like they have never had, will
affirm that integrity is but a social construction or that nobody should be
truly independent. The Representation of Ayn Rand litterateurs like a bunch
of assholes neurotic willing to take what they could never create is
hilarious and, although sometimes simplistic, remains essentially the truth.
Of course, Atlas Shrugged should be read with a huge grain of salt.
Objectivism has no objection against feminism, contempt lots of family and
race, and of course encourages robber barons to do anything they want. Even
then, the main work of Ayn Rand remains infused with a positive sense of
life and a meaningful analysis of major power relations.
4. Rules for Radicals Saul Alinsky
After books about journalism and advertising are the most notorious ever
written about politics. An agitator and demagogue since the late 1930s,
Saul Alinsky had over thirty years of experience when it published the
Rules for Radicals. This book was covered twice ROK, so I will not comment
on briefly.
While elitist prose of lengthy Lippman philosophical atmosphere that makes
it look like a dead ringer for James Burnham, and while the book Bernays
this "board 40%, 40 stories%, 20% bullshit" brand typical of the personal
business of improving things, Alinsky writes clearly put the reader on a
particular track. A master practitioner of pilpul, he manages to mix a
force-position is right near Ragnar Barberousse is with Marxist tone
blandly. If you can endure the pounding-leftism of his prose, the rules for
radicals explains many strategies while organizing or agitator may be used
in special circumstances.
Stir grievances, focusing on insignificant events or unimportant but makes
important taboos, to lobby key people, rattling a compromise by a war of
attrition before abusing her, making a public target "pregnant with hope"
in you by intimating another public so that it remains of the road are all
strategies Alinsky explained.
Rules for Radicals gives an insider view to the complex workings of the
left, which still applies many of these strategies today. A reader of our
side can also pick up some tips, especially since Alinsky was an outsider
to the areas of the property that contributes to lay off, as we are now.
Reading this I started to think about how the left is trying to prevent us
to imitate. Our attempts to organize & # 8212; & # 8212 legally, are still
frantically despised and repressed. Another example is how they managed to
create an aura "rebel brave" around their characters who faced repression
as each individual pilled red rising is reduced to a common denominator and
defamed. Obviously, the lukewarm conservative Alinsky face are nothing
compared to the implementation we face. I guess it will be our victory all
the more commendable.
5. maneuvered Esther Vilar Man
Esther Vilar in 1975
Published in 1972, just one year after the rules Alinsky, maneuvered Man
Vilar is quite different in all respects except maybe the subject.
Originally written in German, written by an author gentile, man maneuvered
comes from a woman who fell ill with how gender plays the oppressed,
fragile, need help to extract a free service of other, namely men.
Like judeocritical Jews are often the best critics of their own background
& # 8212; think about Gilad Atzmon and Paul Gottfried & # 8212; the rare
breed of women who are too honest and good humor to go along with the
position manipulative peers provide valuable information. Vilar was red
pill, manosphere-friendly before the word was invented.
In a clear style, it exposes the true character of feminist (aggressive,
power-hungry, always projecting their own character to the other, blame
everyone but themselves for their own misery), the daily operation of
approach men plagued with anxiety, and how the hardest sex work becomes
increasingly fragile and forced to passive obedience while women "stress"
without becoming a driving force in politics.
In one shot, Vilar removes gallant sails, white-knightism and hammering the
story of both adversarial and more moderate feminists women. The man is
operated as relevant today as in the 70s It also gives a nice guys context
the key to our generation were raised in & # 8212; a context that has
nothing to do with patriarchy.
In many ways, the man maneuvered as Herrnstein and Murray The Bell Curve:
he sold a lot, but only "behind closed doors" are perpetrators receive
support, and from the start they face defamation of muscular media and
death threats.
48 laws of 6. Robert Greene
Having acquired a personal experience of the power dynamics working in
Hollywood, Greene used his passion for history and writing talent to create
the 48 laws of power. The result was a bestseller. Honestly, its success
was deserved.
"Laws" of Greene are general rules more or less in many power relations.
Some of the rules still apply, some are related to the context, all help to
assess a particular situation and know what is happening. The 48 laws have
a very nice layout, telling stories about an optimistic tone, and interpret
both elegant and deeply. As this book has become a classic, with countless
citing sources, I suggest you get a copy if you have used cheap not open
already cracked.
7. Ryan Holiday Trust Me, I'm lying
Note Holiday repressed haircut Alt-Righter
To end this list is a 2.0 version of Edward Bernays. A college dropout,
Ryan Holiday including (1) how the "big names" of mainstream Internet media
took their stories smaller bloggers, and (2) how to bribe bloggers. Believe
me, I lie explains how hilarious feminist triggered holidays for promoting
a shitty movie without even knowing why, or how he flattered and bribed
Instagramers women so that they would "free" advertising for American
Apparel . Gawker and Jezebel are exposed as unethical, scandal Search
points-disconnecting brain.
When it comes to justify the book, vacation, he said finally disgusted with
all the deception around and opted for spilling the beans. Beware of this
type of display. Many offenders are trying to transform their bad
reputation upside claiming loudly that they moved to a road to Damascus.
Nevertheless, it is quite possible that vacation became really unhappy
because he is not Jewish.
It represents (Chapter 14) Andrew Breitbart as a "media manipulator" who
never tired or morally disturbed by what he did. Perhaps at least some
non-Jews can not imitate the "chosen people" all the way down without
feeling like they betray to the bone.
Believe me, I lay suffering from a liberal bias in the choice of some of
its examples. Mention Breitbart, holiday essentially accuses "Republicans
angry" sore SJWs are doing, and shows sympathy for blacks promoted
undeserved as he does not show for targeted SJW dissidents. It also becomes
repetitive after a while. Yet it is a very good book for a
twenty-something, and it can be considered an applied version of the craft
Bernays.
Conclusion
Power over oneself and social power are two different things. Someone can
quietly enjoy the old and live a good happy life without much of a second,
while someone who enjoys much of the second type of power can bring ruin to
himself and other acting as a whiner right. In any case, today the social
power too easily into something disgusting. For often must design an image,
a public appearance itself is deceptive background.
Be honest with Normie, indoctrinated masses, or crooks that awaits us is
like casting pearls before swine. Understanding leftism, or system, or
women, and see beyond the new endless facades is liberating. But the fact
that we sometimes act so Machiavellian feels disturbing. And yet we have no
choice & # 8212; game is about that, and the masses should be said
with "pedagogy", namely a cunning manner, be oriented in the right
direction. Andrew Breitbart Breitbart had to be in the red pill a much
wider audience than Vdare or ROK.
For more social power, we must be creative and flexible, coming unexpected.
Never compromise, however, on fundamentals. Ayn Rand had it right and
Julius Evola did too. Taking this formulation, the role, the cause, and so
on does not necessarily mean a profound agreement with her. As might say
many cases, "it's not that simple. "And even then, I'm a pain in the
stomach when playing rules Alinsky, and again later, when I went through
vacation to paint hypocritically as a liberal truth teller & # 8212 This
which seems rather ridiculous considering that the title of his book.
Apart from Atlas Shrugged, all the books mentioned here are acidic to some
extent, and remains perhaps much more in them could be considered a
Katabasis after which the sacred texts appear only more illuminating and
refreshing.
Read more: The Idiots are useful Proles a bicentennial map Elite?
For power is a part of life, something that permeates our choices, our
actions, our judgments, down from the opening we choose among several to
get this particular girl looking up from her smartphone choices career that
could set the mark for the next ten years.
Some left saying "nothing is neutral," because it is all about power. Such
a sweeping statement is grossly exaggerated and reflects an unhealthy
worship of power, it still contains a kernel of truth. Knowing where your
power begins where a rule of legitimate power, and where you can take and
how, is far from clear, and can not be discovered by experience and a long
reflection.
ancient thought is usually wider, fuller, thicker than its modern
counterpart. It seems less like a lecture and more as a support for
meditation. For this reason, if you want to gain wisdom, I urge you to
start with Plato or Aristotle. However, these are not enough. Since these
eminent philosophers pondered the times have changed and we are faced with
challenges of antiquity men did not know & # 8212; or much less. Today, an
important part of what we struggle with is related to money and cultural
conflicts. These aspects are more directly addresses the contemporary books.
As you will see, pioneers in these areas were barely friends. Among these
works, only two out of seven were written by people who could be considered
more or less on our side, with serious doubts stain one of them. If we want
to beat the hollow Empire on its own ground, meeting with his most cunning
agents is necessary, whatever the bitterness of the experience. It is not
as if they had produced the first bittersweet books after all.
Public Opinion 1. Walter Lippmann
"I'm Chesterton without the mustache and the foreskin. Now listen (((me)))
on the way people live misthink ".
Parked in the wake of the Great War by a Jewish journalist, public opinion
says a lot about the "manufacture of consent" before the infamous Noam
Chomsky was born. You know what you are when you crack open the book and
meeting with a quote from the allegory of Plato's cave in full early. To
recall, the allegory of the cave represents the clueless people whose
prospects are limited by blinders and are led to confuse the puppet shadows
with real things.
Public opinion makes a clear distinction between the two types of
individuals: first, the "elite", the "expert", the "specialist" who has
been trained and knows; On the other hand, the ordinary citizen, that is
riddled with bias and prejudice and is part of a "disoriented flock" in
need of direction. The public, mostly in the form of press day after day,
is how the old guides it & # 8212; for his own good, of course. (In a book
on, The Phantom Public, Lippmann double down and draws an even more
scathing picture of the average public Gentile.)
In criticizing the "unregulated" media and how people, when faced with
incomplete or uncertain information are based on assumptions, Lippmann
explains how to manipulate people and justified. It distinguishes between
a "real" world and "pseudo-environment" because of alleged prejudice,
superstition, stereotypes, myths and & # 8212, you may have guessed it & #
8212; social constructs. The cool part, from the perspective of Lippmann,
is that 1) most stupid goyim can not tell the difference between truth
and "social construction", and 2) the pseudo-environment can be
deconstructed, reconstructed and manipulated by those who know it exists
and how to change it.
If you want to trace the roots of false news media on us looming today,
public opinion is playing, provided that you can wear with arrogant remarks
Lippmann on the "boobies" or on the way to be dissected the girl next to a
psychiatrist. By the way, you may notice that hyper-up stuff like the work
of Daniel Kahneman on "through the people" can easily be called in support
of a Lippmannian program.
2. Edward Bernays Propaganda
A nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays would be advertising and discrete
marketing campaigns that Lippman was journalism. Bernays is indeed a
pioneer in the occult influence, indirect advertising, clever use of
symbolism, spinning and other practices that mark under the euphemistic
term "public relations".
Propaganda, the most famous book Bernays says some of these methods, as
well as successful uses, it is done. For example, in 1915, he promoted a
Russian troupe of ballet dancers promoting their colorful costumes in
fashion, pushing opinion articles on dance, and causing American men (troll
bait "are American men ashamed to be gracious? ").
Bernays is best known for his campaign "freedom torch". To expand the
market for cigarettes, he teamed with a psychoanalyst, (((Abraham Brill))),
and corrupt journalists, and together they spun pseudo-spontaneous events
by young women who smoke in public together . roughly Looks like Soros
Femens. More money for tobacco magnates, plus the ability to turn a story
of "progress" for leftists, less moral for everyone.
Bernays also helped President Woodrow Wilson betray his first campaign
promise, namely that the United States will join the Great War, but managed
to have another propagandist, George Creel, scapegoats in his place during
this campaign was exposed as full of lies.
Play propaganda, note how Bernays attempts to justify and regulate & #
8212; # 8212 in words and his own practice. In a democracy, it is necessary
that "our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely
by men we have never heard of. "Well, maybe free speech for everyone
encourages an arms race on the marketplace ideas, but conveniently forgets
Bernays (((that))) began self-promotion and play tough competition at a
time when it was considered trespassing on the territory of someone else.
3. Ayn Rand Atlas Shrugged
Just need an introduction to the American reader, Atlas Shrugged can be
understood as a philosophical tale about the personal and social power. Far
from being the greedy bastards, they are sometimes portrayed as Hank
Rearden, Francesco d'Anconia, Midas Mulligan et al. are heroic characters
with an own code of ethics and sense of integrity. Full of masculine
energy, they follow their calling, are self-controlled and a strong will to
develop the capacities that enable them to thrive and contribute to the
welfare of society. All are virtuous and some, like d'Anconia, are curious
or playful.
Closely woven with the main adventures of the characters is a real sense of
authenticity. Hank Rearden could earn even more money it already
associating with the corrupt government, but it does not. Midas Mulligan
could continue to invest smartly as he does, but he'd rather scuttle his
own empire that bow down to an unfair trial. John Galt could live in a
house he patented his engine as Tesla, but he spent years in a small
apartment, posing as a humble railway worker, so he and others many
successful spirit setting a crazy world turned.
Atlas Shrugged is based on a sharp distinction between external goods, such
as money and social status and internal elements such as integrity and
values. John Galt teaches all of its targets to abandon the old, no matter
the suffering involved, so they can keep it. Only those who have betrayed
their own moral sense to a place within the system, as a former professor
of Galt Robert Stadler, or those who seem like they have never had, will
affirm that integrity is but a social construction or that nobody should be
truly independent. The Representation of Ayn Rand litterateurs like a bunch
of assholes neurotic willing to take what they could never create is
hilarious and, although sometimes simplistic, remains essentially the truth.
Of course, Atlas Shrugged should be read with a huge grain of salt.
Objectivism has no objection against feminism, contempt lots of family and
race, and of course encourages robber barons to do anything they want. Even
then, the main work of Ayn Rand remains infused with a positive sense of
life and a meaningful analysis of major power relations.
4. Rules for Radicals Saul Alinsky
After books about journalism and advertising are the most notorious ever
written about politics. An agitator and demagogue since the late 1930s,
Saul Alinsky had over thirty years of experience when it published the
Rules for Radicals. This book was covered twice ROK, so I will not comment
on briefly.
While elitist prose of lengthy Lippman philosophical atmosphere that makes
it look like a dead ringer for James Burnham, and while the book Bernays
this "board 40%, 40 stories%, 20% bullshit" brand typical of the personal
business of improving things, Alinsky writes clearly put the reader on a
particular track. A master practitioner of pilpul, he manages to mix a
force-position is right near Ragnar Barberousse is with Marxist tone
blandly. If you can endure the pounding-leftism of his prose, the rules for
radicals explains many strategies while organizing or agitator may be used
in special circumstances.
Stir grievances, focusing on insignificant events or unimportant but makes
important taboos, to lobby key people, rattling a compromise by a war of
attrition before abusing her, making a public target "pregnant with hope"
in you by intimating another public so that it remains of the road are all
strategies Alinsky explained.
Rules for Radicals gives an insider view to the complex workings of the
left, which still applies many of these strategies today. A reader of our
side can also pick up some tips, especially since Alinsky was an outsider
to the areas of the property that contributes to lay off, as we are now.
Reading this I started to think about how the left is trying to prevent us
to imitate. Our attempts to organize & # 8212; & # 8212 legally, are still
frantically despised and repressed. Another example is how they managed to
create an aura "rebel brave" around their characters who faced repression
as each individual pilled red rising is reduced to a common denominator and
defamed. Obviously, the lukewarm conservative Alinsky face are nothing
compared to the implementation we face. I guess it will be our victory all
the more commendable.
5. maneuvered Esther Vilar Man
Esther Vilar in 1975
Published in 1972, just one year after the rules Alinsky, maneuvered Man
Vilar is quite different in all respects except maybe the subject.
Originally written in German, written by an author gentile, man maneuvered
comes from a woman who fell ill with how gender plays the oppressed,
fragile, need help to extract a free service of other, namely men.
Like judeocritical Jews are often the best critics of their own background
& # 8212; think about Gilad Atzmon and Paul Gottfried & # 8212; the rare
breed of women who are too honest and good humor to go along with the
position manipulative peers provide valuable information. Vilar was red
pill, manosphere-friendly before the word was invented.
In a clear style, it exposes the true character of feminist (aggressive,
power-hungry, always projecting their own character to the other, blame
everyone but themselves for their own misery), the daily operation of
approach men plagued with anxiety, and how the hardest sex work becomes
increasingly fragile and forced to passive obedience while women "stress"
without becoming a driving force in politics.
In one shot, Vilar removes gallant sails, white-knightism and hammering the
story of both adversarial and more moderate feminists women. The man is
operated as relevant today as in the 70s It also gives a nice guys context
the key to our generation were raised in & # 8212; a context that has
nothing to do with patriarchy.
In many ways, the man maneuvered as Herrnstein and Murray The Bell Curve:
he sold a lot, but only "behind closed doors" are perpetrators receive
support, and from the start they face defamation of muscular media and
death threats.
48 laws of 6. Robert Greene
Having acquired a personal experience of the power dynamics working in
Hollywood, Greene used his passion for history and writing talent to create
the 48 laws of power. The result was a bestseller. Honestly, its success
was deserved.
"Laws" of Greene are general rules more or less in many power relations.
Some of the rules still apply, some are related to the context, all help to
assess a particular situation and know what is happening. The 48 laws have
a very nice layout, telling stories about an optimistic tone, and interpret
both elegant and deeply. As this book has become a classic, with countless
citing sources, I suggest you get a copy if you have used cheap not open
already cracked.
7. Ryan Holiday Trust Me, I'm lying
Note Holiday repressed haircut Alt-Righter
To end this list is a 2.0 version of Edward Bernays. A college dropout,
Ryan Holiday including (1) how the "big names" of mainstream Internet media
took their stories smaller bloggers, and (2) how to bribe bloggers. Believe
me, I lie explains how hilarious feminist triggered holidays for promoting
a shitty movie without even knowing why, or how he flattered and bribed
Instagramers women so that they would "free" advertising for American
Apparel . Gawker and Jezebel are exposed as unethical, scandal Search
points-disconnecting brain.
When it comes to justify the book, vacation, he said finally disgusted with
all the deception around and opted for spilling the beans. Beware of this
type of display. Many offenders are trying to transform their bad
reputation upside claiming loudly that they moved to a road to Damascus.
Nevertheless, it is quite possible that vacation became really unhappy
because he is not Jewish.
It represents (Chapter 14) Andrew Breitbart as a "media manipulator" who
never tired or morally disturbed by what he did. Perhaps at least some
non-Jews can not imitate the "chosen people" all the way down without
feeling like they betray to the bone.
Believe me, I lay suffering from a liberal bias in the choice of some of
its examples. Mention Breitbart, holiday essentially accuses "Republicans
angry" sore SJWs are doing, and shows sympathy for blacks promoted
undeserved as he does not show for targeted SJW dissidents. It also becomes
repetitive after a while. Yet it is a very good book for a
twenty-something, and it can be considered an applied version of the craft
Bernays.
Conclusion
Power over oneself and social power are two different things. Someone can
quietly enjoy the old and live a good happy life without much of a second,
while someone who enjoys much of the second type of power can bring ruin to
himself and other acting as a whiner right. In any case, today the social
power too easily into something disgusting. For often must design an image,
a public appearance itself is deceptive background.
Be honest with Normie, indoctrinated masses, or crooks that awaits us is
like casting pearls before swine. Understanding leftism, or system, or
women, and see beyond the new endless facades is liberating. But the fact
that we sometimes act so Machiavellian feels disturbing. And yet we have no
choice & # 8212; game is about that, and the masses should be said
with "pedagogy", namely a cunning manner, be oriented in the right
direction. Andrew Breitbart Breitbart had to be in the red pill a much
wider audience than Vdare or ROK.
For more social power, we must be creative and flexible, coming unexpected.
Never compromise, however, on fundamentals. Ayn Rand had it right and
Julius Evola did too. Taking this formulation, the role, the cause, and so
on does not necessarily mean a profound agreement with her. As might say
many cases, "it's not that simple. "And even then, I'm a pain in the
stomach when playing rules Alinsky, and again later, when I went through
vacation to paint hypocritically as a liberal truth teller & # 8212 This
which seems rather ridiculous considering that the title of his book.
Apart from Atlas Shrugged, all the books mentioned here are acidic to some
extent, and remains perhaps much more in them could be considered a
Katabasis after which the sacred texts appear only more illuminating and
refreshing.
Read more: The Idiots are useful Proles a bicentennial map Elite?
Sexbot And Damaged "very dirty" by Horny Men At Tech Conference
Via Breitbart:
A version of Samantha display model, a sex robot popular high technology,
was damaged and "very dirty" by several men at a technical conference in
Barcelona, Spain, this month, according to a report .
Developer Samantha Sergi Santos, said men treated sex robot "like
barbarians", broke two of his fingers and left her "very dirty" at
Electronica Arts Festival.
This is a robot, not a real woman
"People Samantha mounted breasts, legs and arms ... Two fingers were
broken. It was nasty, "said Santos, who added that sexual robot was to be
sent away for repairs and cleaning. "Samantha can withstand a lot, she'll
be fine. "
Samantha, which sells for about $ 6450, has an artificial G, various modes
of interaction and voice activation.
"You can touch Samantha in hands, you can kiss Samantha, she likes to be
kissed," said Santos earlier this year. "Normally she likes to be always
embraced, and as it answers, basically, the G and also the breasts. It can
also respond to the hands. So basically, the hands are family, romantic,
hips are family and romantic, and essentially where she would feel sexy
mouth and the G ".
She never cheat on him
"She has a way of interacting that at first it would be romantic, she would
be the family, and get to a point that she wants to have sex," he
said. "The goal, the ultimate goal of sexual fashion is to give her an
orgasm. "
Read the article
Don t Miss: How fast approaching sexbot technology makes Fearful women
A version of Samantha display model, a sex robot popular high technology,
was damaged and "very dirty" by several men at a technical conference in
Barcelona, Spain, this month, according to a report .
Developer Samantha Sergi Santos, said men treated sex robot "like
barbarians", broke two of his fingers and left her "very dirty" at
Electronica Arts Festival.
This is a robot, not a real woman
"People Samantha mounted breasts, legs and arms ... Two fingers were
broken. It was nasty, "said Santos, who added that sexual robot was to be
sent away for repairs and cleaning. "Samantha can withstand a lot, she'll
be fine. "
Samantha, which sells for about $ 6450, has an artificial G, various modes
of interaction and voice activation.
"You can touch Samantha in hands, you can kiss Samantha, she likes to be
kissed," said Santos earlier this year. "Normally she likes to be always
embraced, and as it answers, basically, the G and also the breasts. It can
also respond to the hands. So basically, the hands are family, romantic,
hips are family and romantic, and essentially where she would feel sexy
mouth and the G ".
She never cheat on him
"She has a way of interacting that at first it would be romantic, she would
be the family, and get to a point that she wants to have sex," he
said. "The goal, the ultimate goal of sexual fashion is to give her an
orgasm. "
Read the article
Don t Miss: How fast approaching sexbot technology makes Fearful women
4 words liberals use weapons to destroy Western society
A very emphatic but very smart, strong and witty radio talk show called
Michael Savage refers to the war left on American values as an attack on
our "borders, language and culture. "I do not think individual pundit or
commentator summarized more accurately this great divide in three simple
words.
The attack on our language in particular, is very dangerous, but effective
tactics & # 8211; it is a battle between intellectuals in the wider war
against our borders and culture, a war which expands and embraces all the
widest range of both the educated and uneducated on both sides of the
debate. That is to say, it does not take an educated man to notice the
attack on our borders and culture, but we can not say for such an attack
calculated on our language.
The English language is a beautiful and complex. For non-native speakers,
it is difficult to learn, and many US citizens graduates with college
degrees still can not write an effective thesis in their own mother tongue.
As such, it is impossible to overstate how disconcerting it is for the
majority of the population are not fully aware that their language was
taken hostage and is compromised daily. The words have little meaning more,
and great speakers this generation & # 8211; men like Alan Watts,
Christopher Hitchens, and other great masters of the word turn definitely
in their graves over what is happening today.
Here are some examples of how the Left has invented new words or kidnapped
existing ones to try to redefine them according to their agenda:
& # 8221 Islamophobia;
A persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation
that leads to a compelling desire to avoid & # 8221. & # 8211;
Dictionary.com
There is no such thing as an irrational fear or aversion to Islam. As for
the specific principles of the Koran and Hadith, the fear of those ideas
being exported to your country is incredibly rational. In addition, an
aversion to stoning women for adultery, throwing homosexuals from roofs or
apostates decapitation seems not only rational, but noble. One could make a
strong argument that to be anti-Islam was synonymous with being pro-human
rights.
The word "Islamophobia" is a ploy & # 8211; a propaganda word used by
Islamists who believe it should be illegal to criticize Islam, to deter the
infidels to the public. As Marco Rubio said, let's dispel the idea that
those who use the word do not know what they do. They just what they do
because they are often lawyers, professors and people of average
intelligence.
We all agree that the discomfort just to see a Hindu or Sikh family on your
flight could be a true testament to intolerance, but that
the "Islamophobia" crowd have deliberately conflate the generic bigotry
towards people with skin brown with the opposition to Islamic doctrine.
This is very dangerous because of the possibility of a slippery slope
progression. Yesterday, he drew Muhammad, he is now criticizing Islam, and
tomorrow he is to be a non-Muslim.
Rape
I can not even.
. The unlawful sexual intercourse or other sexual penetration of the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person, with or without force, with a
sexual organ, the other part of the body or foreign body, without the
consent of the victim and # 8221; & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Have you noticed the qualifier penetration?
We all know the universally discredited myth that claims 1-5 women are the
victims of "sexual assault" on college campuses, but we'll break it down.
Apparently a study was conducted in 2007 concluded that the above
assertion. This wacky study and inherently flawed probed an extremely small
sample of women, deliberated on the terms of the issues in the waves, broad
as possible.
The only study interviewed 5,446 women in two universities, and included
highly subjective questions such as:
"Have you been unable to give consent or to stop what was going on because
you were unconscious, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep? "
"Can you tell us about sexual encounters you think (not sure) happened? "
The first step was to blur the lines between rape, a very specific term,
and sexual assault, a term much larger and a little less severe. The second
step was to expand the definition of "sexual assault" to include rude
comments, touching of the hair or shoulders, even consensual sex between
two drunken adults resulted in women buyer's remorse the next day. The
third step is the vagueness of the definition of consent as a woman waiting
to act responsibly was much lower than a man's, while his speech in a court
meant much more than the his.
Once the term "sexual assault" was diluted in meaning and it was made
interchangeable with rape, which allowed Proctors of the study to double
their confirmation bias and say that 1 in 5 women have actually raped on
American university campuses, painting on unfair picture of men
as "potential rapists" and the American campus as more dangerous than ISIS
territory for a young woman.
& # 8221 racism;
A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a
race & # 8221. & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Dating from the 1970s, the extreme left has hijacked the word "racism" to
include vague conclusions "power." This is an extension of "critical race
theory," which was made popular by a handful of black male and (mostly
obese) university professors white women. He kept a pulse due to modern
racing Hustlers as Marc Lamont Hill and Michael Eric Dyson constantly
referring to during their word salad a week on CNN / MSNBC.
This alternative definition with strong implications of "power" is not a
public definition outside academic classrooms radical left or commentator
panels & # 8220 Said, new stations, but as the far left develops and
becomes more vocal, this definition is more shouting with megaphones
vehemently with each passing year.
These vague conclusions "could" are generally accompanied by other words
the liberal mode as "institutional" and "systemic". These words are as
deliberately broad and generally based on philosophical tropes, referring
to how the effects of slavery are "intractable" even 160 years later. These
race hustlers must fall back on old clichés in the absence of an abundance
of specific examples today. Note that some systemic racism (emails
Ministry: Ferguson Police) are not sufficient evidence to condemn a whole
country of 330 million people "systemic racism".
The goal is simple: to give the impression that whites have a monopoly on
racism. It gives non-whites carte blanche to take their anti-white racism
as they want, because by definition they can not be racist. Forget tens of
millions of white people who live in poverty as we removed an election of a
black president and black attorney general, but even black life loosely
affiliated terrorist material "can not be racist" because they not benefit
from these invisible, so "systems" -called discriminatory, which have been
abolished in the 1960 s.
I waited as long for someone to ask Marc Lamont Hill, Michael Eric Dyson,
or Shaun Talc X & # 8221; King if whites can be racist in South Africa
where they face a genocide, or Zimbabwe, where a government decree they can
not own land. I'm still waiting.
& # 8221 Nazi;
A member of the National Socialist German Workers Party, which controlled
Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler & # 8211; Dictionary.com
There are very few Nazis still living. Many of them are in their 90's and
continued throughout the world for war crimes committed there seven years.
There is indeed a movement resurgent neo-Nazis in the West, largely in
response to this global attack on our borders, language and culture. The
neo-Nazis represent an extreme profound perversion of what we
affectionately call "Western culture". They are absolutist and totalitarian
in their way, what separates them from the rest of the conservatives.
These individuals have been marginalized and relegated to the fringes of
society where they belonged. People like David Duke had not heard in twenty
years, until CNN resurrected him as a weapon to maul with Trump during the
primaries. The movement of white supremacy as a whole was dug in the
darkness by Antifa, who needed an enemy to hit. These neo-Nazis are
throwbacks who share the ideology of the Nazis, but they are not Nazis.
They are impostors Nazis and not nearly as dangerous or intimidating than
the original version, as much as they wish they were.
There are a wide range of sectarianism on the far right, not every
conservative is someone like Richard Spencer. However, the extreme left has
gone nuclear with the term "Nazi" to almost everyone on this side of the
50-yard line. It was quite an exaggeration to say that Milo Yiannopoulos, a
homosexual who prefers black men of a neo-Nazi, but the left has lost any
remaining credibility when calling people like Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris
Nazis. Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew, Harris is a liberal atheist, and both
are strong supporters of the State of Israel. The day these men were called
Nazis for the first time was the irony of the day died.
These examples are not the only four I can think of, but if you are in a
public debate and a word is used in the context mentioned above,
respectfully show that there is no speech that both parties show respect
for the language we all agreed. And if they insist, make sure they
understand that the deployment of the extraordinary luxury of redefining
the words at will could be their non-white privilege speak.
More: this may be the best way to learn a language
Michael Savage refers to the war left on American values as an attack on
our "borders, language and culture. "I do not think individual pundit or
commentator summarized more accurately this great divide in three simple
words.
The attack on our language in particular, is very dangerous, but effective
tactics & # 8211; it is a battle between intellectuals in the wider war
against our borders and culture, a war which expands and embraces all the
widest range of both the educated and uneducated on both sides of the
debate. That is to say, it does not take an educated man to notice the
attack on our borders and culture, but we can not say for such an attack
calculated on our language.
The English language is a beautiful and complex. For non-native speakers,
it is difficult to learn, and many US citizens graduates with college
degrees still can not write an effective thesis in their own mother tongue.
As such, it is impossible to overstate how disconcerting it is for the
majority of the population are not fully aware that their language was
taken hostage and is compromised daily. The words have little meaning more,
and great speakers this generation & # 8211; men like Alan Watts,
Christopher Hitchens, and other great masters of the word turn definitely
in their graves over what is happening today.
Here are some examples of how the Left has invented new words or kidnapped
existing ones to try to redefine them according to their agenda:
& # 8221 Islamophobia;
A persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation
that leads to a compelling desire to avoid & # 8221. & # 8211;
Dictionary.com
There is no such thing as an irrational fear or aversion to Islam. As for
the specific principles of the Koran and Hadith, the fear of those ideas
being exported to your country is incredibly rational. In addition, an
aversion to stoning women for adultery, throwing homosexuals from roofs or
apostates decapitation seems not only rational, but noble. One could make a
strong argument that to be anti-Islam was synonymous with being pro-human
rights.
The word "Islamophobia" is a ploy & # 8211; a propaganda word used by
Islamists who believe it should be illegal to criticize Islam, to deter the
infidels to the public. As Marco Rubio said, let's dispel the idea that
those who use the word do not know what they do. They just what they do
because they are often lawyers, professors and people of average
intelligence.
We all agree that the discomfort just to see a Hindu or Sikh family on your
flight could be a true testament to intolerance, but that
the "Islamophobia" crowd have deliberately conflate the generic bigotry
towards people with skin brown with the opposition to Islamic doctrine.
This is very dangerous because of the possibility of a slippery slope
progression. Yesterday, he drew Muhammad, he is now criticizing Islam, and
tomorrow he is to be a non-Muslim.
Rape
I can not even.
. The unlawful sexual intercourse or other sexual penetration of the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person, with or without force, with a
sexual organ, the other part of the body or foreign body, without the
consent of the victim and # 8221; & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Have you noticed the qualifier penetration?
We all know the universally discredited myth that claims 1-5 women are the
victims of "sexual assault" on college campuses, but we'll break it down.
Apparently a study was conducted in 2007 concluded that the above
assertion. This wacky study and inherently flawed probed an extremely small
sample of women, deliberated on the terms of the issues in the waves, broad
as possible.
The only study interviewed 5,446 women in two universities, and included
highly subjective questions such as:
"Have you been unable to give consent or to stop what was going on because
you were unconscious, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep? "
"Can you tell us about sexual encounters you think (not sure) happened? "
The first step was to blur the lines between rape, a very specific term,
and sexual assault, a term much larger and a little less severe. The second
step was to expand the definition of "sexual assault" to include rude
comments, touching of the hair or shoulders, even consensual sex between
two drunken adults resulted in women buyer's remorse the next day. The
third step is the vagueness of the definition of consent as a woman waiting
to act responsibly was much lower than a man's, while his speech in a court
meant much more than the his.
Once the term "sexual assault" was diluted in meaning and it was made
interchangeable with rape, which allowed Proctors of the study to double
their confirmation bias and say that 1 in 5 women have actually raped on
American university campuses, painting on unfair picture of men
as "potential rapists" and the American campus as more dangerous than ISIS
territory for a young woman.
& # 8221 racism;
A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a
race & # 8221. & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Dating from the 1970s, the extreme left has hijacked the word "racism" to
include vague conclusions "power." This is an extension of "critical race
theory," which was made popular by a handful of black male and (mostly
obese) university professors white women. He kept a pulse due to modern
racing Hustlers as Marc Lamont Hill and Michael Eric Dyson constantly
referring to during their word salad a week on CNN / MSNBC.
This alternative definition with strong implications of "power" is not a
public definition outside academic classrooms radical left or commentator
panels & # 8220 Said, new stations, but as the far left develops and
becomes more vocal, this definition is more shouting with megaphones
vehemently with each passing year.
These vague conclusions "could" are generally accompanied by other words
the liberal mode as "institutional" and "systemic". These words are as
deliberately broad and generally based on philosophical tropes, referring
to how the effects of slavery are "intractable" even 160 years later. These
race hustlers must fall back on old clichés in the absence of an abundance
of specific examples today. Note that some systemic racism (emails
Ministry: Ferguson Police) are not sufficient evidence to condemn a whole
country of 330 million people "systemic racism".
The goal is simple: to give the impression that whites have a monopoly on
racism. It gives non-whites carte blanche to take their anti-white racism
as they want, because by definition they can not be racist. Forget tens of
millions of white people who live in poverty as we removed an election of a
black president and black attorney general, but even black life loosely
affiliated terrorist material "can not be racist" because they not benefit
from these invisible, so "systems" -called discriminatory, which have been
abolished in the 1960 s.
I waited as long for someone to ask Marc Lamont Hill, Michael Eric Dyson,
or Shaun Talc X & # 8221; King if whites can be racist in South Africa
where they face a genocide, or Zimbabwe, where a government decree they can
not own land. I'm still waiting.
& # 8221 Nazi;
A member of the National Socialist German Workers Party, which controlled
Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler & # 8211; Dictionary.com
There are very few Nazis still living. Many of them are in their 90's and
continued throughout the world for war crimes committed there seven years.
There is indeed a movement resurgent neo-Nazis in the West, largely in
response to this global attack on our borders, language and culture. The
neo-Nazis represent an extreme profound perversion of what we
affectionately call "Western culture". They are absolutist and totalitarian
in their way, what separates them from the rest of the conservatives.
These individuals have been marginalized and relegated to the fringes of
society where they belonged. People like David Duke had not heard in twenty
years, until CNN resurrected him as a weapon to maul with Trump during the
primaries. The movement of white supremacy as a whole was dug in the
darkness by Antifa, who needed an enemy to hit. These neo-Nazis are
throwbacks who share the ideology of the Nazis, but they are not Nazis.
They are impostors Nazis and not nearly as dangerous or intimidating than
the original version, as much as they wish they were.
There are a wide range of sectarianism on the far right, not every
conservative is someone like Richard Spencer. However, the extreme left has
gone nuclear with the term "Nazi" to almost everyone on this side of the
50-yard line. It was quite an exaggeration to say that Milo Yiannopoulos, a
homosexual who prefers black men of a neo-Nazi, but the left has lost any
remaining credibility when calling people like Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris
Nazis. Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew, Harris is a liberal atheist, and both
are strong supporters of the State of Israel. The day these men were called
Nazis for the first time was the irony of the day died.
These examples are not the only four I can think of, but if you are in a
public debate and a word is used in the context mentioned above,
respectfully show that there is no speech that both parties show respect
for the language we all agreed. And if they insist, make sure they
understand that the deployment of the extraordinary luxury of redefining
the words at will could be their non-white privilege speak.
More: this may be the best way to learn a language
Millionaire Oxford girl is "too clear" to go to jail after stabbing and her boyfriend Attack
Just like Return Of Kings predicted in June, Oxford medical student Lavinia
Woodward received his pass obediently pussy, with a British judge prison
savings. This despite breaking his bail conditions by sending his victim,
she was stabbed and hit with various physical objects. She was given a very
meager prison ten months suspended by Ian Pringle QC judge.
Using the typical trope of having an older boyfriend who abused & # 8221;
she and pleas immaturity, mental illness, and I have a drug addiction,
Woodward walked out of the courtroom a free woman. Even in a world where we
should be accustomed to favor women, especially in the legal system, its
preferential treatment is more worthy of a second article here.
While men across the Western world, especially the US, are punished for
very fabulist entirely unproven claims of rape and banned from campus
forever, Oxford University is yet to decide to launch Lavinia Woodward
medical school. She was found guilty there are several months, and not by
an academic group or a court but by a court. If you need a single case
study to illustrate how universities are so openly contemptuous of men and
regular procedure lenient toward women behaving badly, here.
Justice Ian Pringle QC stressed he was reluctant to ruin Lavinia Woodward's
career prospects.
After hiring a lawyer who represents the family social status, one of the
main (and most expensive) criminal lawyers in England, James Sturman QC,
Woodward was in a very favorable position from the start. His family's very
rich financial situation has worsened women's privilege she enjoyed already.
Meanwhile, as everyone in the middle and working classes, most of them men,
who end up being imprisoned for actions similar or even much less serious?
That poor, poor girl millionaires!
While Lavinia Woodward spends time idyllic holiday destinations, or just
living his normal life of luxury in Italy, other students slaving away
without resorting to taking drugs or criminal violence.
Here's a brief summary, not exhaustive Lavinia Woodward extraordinary life
of privilege:
his father was an oil company executive multimillionaire;
it often lives in a royal villa as in northern Italy, which belongs to his
mother;
she attended Sir James Henderson British School of Milan, where fees cost
at least the equivalent of $ 20 000 per year, in addition to all other
expenses (Swiss ski trips, etc.) associated with an institution as
prestigious;
while many students slaving away at odd jobs part time to make ends meet,
she is known for taking $ 1400 Chanel designer handbags to the class; and
at the time of his sentence deferred mid-year, it was revealed that she was
currently subject to a mandatory drug testing regime at the insistence of
his college at Oxford, Christ Church, which was supposedly ready to deport
if it did not comply (ROK still doubt the loan part).
Life can not become completely perfect when your family wealth gives that
kind of existence on you, but Lavinia Woodward has a much better life than
99.9% of us, be it man, woman, black, white , liberal or conservative. It's
not ghetto girl whose life of poverty and extreme poverty is doing what she
did.
Worst of all, Woodward still has a fighting chance of qualifying as a
surgeon. Yet if we were chronic drug addicts, fans of family violence, and
just generally unbalanced as this girl is, those of us from the average
regular classroom environments would maintain absolutely no chance of being
recognized as surgeons, lawyers or members of other professions-upper. rung
Unfortunately, I can not imagine a future for Woodward financially as
health care, due to the fact that the powers-either require more surgeons,
software engineers, and scientists & # 8221; no matter the cost. If it
reaches its goal, future male colleagues will likely white knight for it ad
nauseam, ignoring the inevitable emotional outbursts and even serious
mistakes at work.
As you walk in life on eggs, the Lavinia Woodwards in the world can do what
they want and face no consequences
On the positive side, Lavinia Woodward taking drugs and perhaps karma are
his age very badly.
You may be perfectly capable (and overqualified) male candidate for a job
and do not get the position, simply because you're male and mentally
erratic Lavinia Woodward should take your place. If you're on a college
campus right now, you are automatically branded a potential rapist or even
probably because of your genitalia. But a woman with a deranged behavior
proven history of violence and can expect a flood of sympathy and be given
the chance after chance, despite coming from a rich social environment that
says she has an excuse zero for these antics.
Life for modern humans is very similar to walking on eggshells. Without any
bad of your own that you can and will be punished. At the same time, those
who have real things to apologize for, many or most women will constantly
excused their actions and completely ignored.
Who said life in the 21st century was just?
More: Judge: Female medical student who stabbed the man is "too intelligent
enough" to prison
Woodward received his pass obediently pussy, with a British judge prison
savings. This despite breaking his bail conditions by sending his victim,
she was stabbed and hit with various physical objects. She was given a very
meager prison ten months suspended by Ian Pringle QC judge.
Using the typical trope of having an older boyfriend who abused & # 8221;
she and pleas immaturity, mental illness, and I have a drug addiction,
Woodward walked out of the courtroom a free woman. Even in a world where we
should be accustomed to favor women, especially in the legal system, its
preferential treatment is more worthy of a second article here.
While men across the Western world, especially the US, are punished for
very fabulist entirely unproven claims of rape and banned from campus
forever, Oxford University is yet to decide to launch Lavinia Woodward
medical school. She was found guilty there are several months, and not by
an academic group or a court but by a court. If you need a single case
study to illustrate how universities are so openly contemptuous of men and
regular procedure lenient toward women behaving badly, here.
Justice Ian Pringle QC stressed he was reluctant to ruin Lavinia Woodward's
career prospects.
After hiring a lawyer who represents the family social status, one of the
main (and most expensive) criminal lawyers in England, James Sturman QC,
Woodward was in a very favorable position from the start. His family's very
rich financial situation has worsened women's privilege she enjoyed already.
Meanwhile, as everyone in the middle and working classes, most of them men,
who end up being imprisoned for actions similar or even much less serious?
That poor, poor girl millionaires!
While Lavinia Woodward spends time idyllic holiday destinations, or just
living his normal life of luxury in Italy, other students slaving away
without resorting to taking drugs or criminal violence.
Here's a brief summary, not exhaustive Lavinia Woodward extraordinary life
of privilege:
his father was an oil company executive multimillionaire;
it often lives in a royal villa as in northern Italy, which belongs to his
mother;
she attended Sir James Henderson British School of Milan, where fees cost
at least the equivalent of $ 20 000 per year, in addition to all other
expenses (Swiss ski trips, etc.) associated with an institution as
prestigious;
while many students slaving away at odd jobs part time to make ends meet,
she is known for taking $ 1400 Chanel designer handbags to the class; and
at the time of his sentence deferred mid-year, it was revealed that she was
currently subject to a mandatory drug testing regime at the insistence of
his college at Oxford, Christ Church, which was supposedly ready to deport
if it did not comply (ROK still doubt the loan part).
Life can not become completely perfect when your family wealth gives that
kind of existence on you, but Lavinia Woodward has a much better life than
99.9% of us, be it man, woman, black, white , liberal or conservative. It's
not ghetto girl whose life of poverty and extreme poverty is doing what she
did.
Worst of all, Woodward still has a fighting chance of qualifying as a
surgeon. Yet if we were chronic drug addicts, fans of family violence, and
just generally unbalanced as this girl is, those of us from the average
regular classroom environments would maintain absolutely no chance of being
recognized as surgeons, lawyers or members of other professions-upper. rung
Unfortunately, I can not imagine a future for Woodward financially as
health care, due to the fact that the powers-either require more surgeons,
software engineers, and scientists & # 8221; no matter the cost. If it
reaches its goal, future male colleagues will likely white knight for it ad
nauseam, ignoring the inevitable emotional outbursts and even serious
mistakes at work.
As you walk in life on eggs, the Lavinia Woodwards in the world can do what
they want and face no consequences
On the positive side, Lavinia Woodward taking drugs and perhaps karma are
his age very badly.
You may be perfectly capable (and overqualified) male candidate for a job
and do not get the position, simply because you're male and mentally
erratic Lavinia Woodward should take your place. If you're on a college
campus right now, you are automatically branded a potential rapist or even
probably because of your genitalia. But a woman with a deranged behavior
proven history of violence and can expect a flood of sympathy and be given
the chance after chance, despite coming from a rich social environment that
says she has an excuse zero for these antics.
Life for modern humans is very similar to walking on eggshells. Without any
bad of your own that you can and will be punished. At the same time, those
who have real things to apologize for, many or most women will constantly
excused their actions and completely ignored.
Who said life in the 21st century was just?
More: Judge: Female medical student who stabbed the man is "too intelligent
enough" to prison
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)