As a divorced man, I have a permanent burden. It is child support. I, like
many of my divorced brothers, I am solely responsible for the financial
well being of my child. The law in the State of Israel, like other nations,
put this burden on me. A burden that the children's mother does not share
legally.
My story may be a little different, but it shares the same dynamic and the
account of others: I married a showgirl of the Epiphany, which sought a
good supplier beta (with some alpha qualities). I was blue as a smurf, and
have the scars to show it.
That's why I rejoiced momentarily, reading the following news (in July)
The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that divorced mothers of children aged
six to 15 will also share the financial burden of support for children with
fathers if their salaries are equal to or more children and the wife are in
shared custody [Israeli ].
The decision issued by an expanded panel of seven judges, was given in
response to a call of two divorced men whose ex-wives earned higher wages
than they did, but were still required to pay a child support even if their
children were in shared custody.
Justice? Will it be?
That seems fair enough. Yet, as we live in the matrix, I decided to read
the verdict for myself. Although I am not a lawyer, I decided to share the
story, good and evil with South Korean players.
The story
The couple, referred to in the verdict, married in 1999. They divorced in
2014, with 3 children. They agreed to an actual joint custody (equal number
of nights, children spend all parents over a period of time). The mother is
also slightly more than the father (it's ~ $ 3,500 / month and made $ 3750
month ~ /). It's close enough to be considered an equal income.
At the end of 2013 (during the divorce), she sued for child support of $
2500 / month. I'm actually mortified at this number. Does she even
understand the implications of asking this? Such as CH states:
When love is gone, women can be as cold as if they had never known you.
The Family Court decided against it. The judge said that the principles of
justice and women's equality, we must look at both parental income and
mandating child support based on these. However, since it is not consistent
with previous decisions, the judge decided that it is only for ages 6-15.
If a woman feels that she is entitled to the money, she will not back down
this easy. She appealed to the district court, and in early 2015 a verdict
providing $ 800 / month child support for children. This was because the
verdict was based on Israeli and Jewish law, and the fear that the father
would use joint custody as an excuse to reduce the child support while
not "pulling its weight as a parent" .
It seems that there was a contradiction. On one side is the law, which
requires man, and that man pay support first. On the other side is equality
and justice which requires that both parents share the load.
The father appealed to the Supreme Court and could delay the verdict until
the new verdict (which is final).
Good
1. The court noted that there is a gender bias, and this time it is against
men.
This is good because it pushes the feminist narrative / SJW that "the
oppressor can not be oppressed." You want to fight against SJW story? Here
is a case of application of Equalism ideology in its full extent.
2. The court noticed and mentioned that divorced fathers bear a financial
burden much more than divorced mothers.
Next time she tells you that divorced women have it tough, you can say,
well my darling, the Supreme Court thinks fathers have much more
financially difficult. Do you want to change and the financial burden,
while the man sits at home and collects child support? "
Maybe not that much of a burden
3. The Court cited the UN "Convention on the Rights of the Child" Article
27:
1. States Parties recognize the right of every child to a standard of
living adequate for the child's physical, mental, spiritual, moral and
social.
2. The parent (s) or others responsible for the child have the primary
responsibility to secure, within their abilities and financial means, the
conditions of living necessary for the child's development.
This means that lowering the father of the living standard is against the
UN treaty, that most States are members. The next time you are in court,
trying to use it (I doubt, but it's worth a try).
4. Perhaps the most important is the decision: child support is based on
both parents' financial capacity (ages 6-15).
This means that a frivolous divorced woman can not simply claim that
children need "standard of living". In this case, it will take over (at
least) its share. , It also provides custody apart in public education
again.
The bad
1. The Court shared feminist estimated the "wage gap".
Although it proved again as false, the Israeli Supreme Court also cites
feminist literature and articles and believes that women earn less and it
is because they take care of the household. Even our dear Attention-whores
HuffPo know it is wrong. But as we all know, if you repeat a lie often
enough it becomes the truth.
2. The court takes a view that fathers seeking joint custody may be just
trying to reduce their child support.
Sometimes SJW feminists are tangled in its own web. On the one hand, they
want the mothers and fathers are equal parents. On the other hand, if a
father trying to be equal parents (joint custody), then it is automatically
a suspect. This is exactly what my colleague Ryan Campbell recently titled
his recent article, "Men always be considered evil by feminists."
3. The court said it will not provide a formula for child support. This
will be case by case.
If the law is clear and simple, people know what to do. If there is a "case
by case" that the judge (Israel has no jury). This makes the most complex
situations and confusing. He recently said that "constructive ambiguity" is
good for your game, but it is definitely not good to cover risks such as
marriage.
More than that, Article 61 of the Family verdict mandates courts to
determine a mechanism to handle for children "other necessary expenses." It
must be based on one of the parents who will be compensated by the other or
even a joint bank account. This, to me, is somewhat worrying. joint bank
account is what you had when you were married. It does not work that, why
should it work now? Moreover, since women are prone to get into debt, what
happens if it uses this account to a "I had to buy it, you pay now"
spending?
What I feel financially after my divorce
One good thing about the divorce that I noticed is that you can cover your
family's expenses. Child support is known, and unless a disaster happens
(and they usually are not), you have a good idea of how much you'll need
to cough every month.
Final thoughts
The verdict itself can be found here (it's in Hebrew). As I said above,
there is both good and bad. I think the good (this time) outweighs the bad.
Please note that is relevant only for Israel, but the feeling can spread to
other countries.
Sometimes when we apply justice and equality, it can promote the man (at
least compared to what we had so far). We'll see if other developments in
this field will take place. The Israeli DoJ was losing speed or try
(depending on which side of the feminist card sitting) not to change the
law, even after several appointed committees have highlighted some of the
current inequities mentioned in the verdict. I'm semi-optimistic, as Israel
has a relatively low divorce rate of 30%.
Read more: Man must pay $ 30,000 child support to someone else's child
Monday, September 4, 2017
3 Downsides traditional dating women
Women from more traditional societies, such as in Eastern Europe, South
Asia and the Caribbean, are often compared by mainly Western authors in
their US, UK, and their counterparts in Western Europe . Their femininity,
obedience, care and support are highly praised. As someone who grew up in
Eastern Europe (Bulgaria) and spent most of the past five years in the
South Pacific (Philippines), I am surrounded by women basically all my
life, but there some drawbacks to dating this type of woman.
1. Traditional women are very dependent
It is a fact that many girls in poor countries have fewer resources than
men, and if they want a better life, they need someone who can provide them
more resources. This is among the main reasons why Western men have a huge
success in their home country and # 8212; their potential for resource
extraction is recognized immediately.
Not pretend, however, that the masculine role of a "supplier" has upsides.
Usually these girls will be your responsibility throughout your
relationship. If you are dating by the way, you will not feel bad, because
you only pay for a few drinks and meals here and there, but if you consider
entering into a relationship, know that it will be up to you to provide
up 'to the bitter end (or possibly forever, according to the laws on
marriage).
Many traditional women are resourceful and can learn quickly, but they
generally do not spend the time and money to pursue fancy studies, which
could make the feared woman of strong and independent career. If you can
pay the bill and bring another person on the back (with the exception of
all, you can end up having all wonders), then everything should be good.
If you can barely afford to have a good life on your own, when you start
to "provide" chances are you'll find yourself in the situation of a
declining standard of living. I know a lot of guys are excited by the
thought that their wives existence depends on the money they bring home,
and this can be a concern for you if you are responsible, but it is
certainly a factor often neglected to consider before committing to it
anything long term.
2. They are very good long game
My impression from reading the Western women is that the most difficult is
to establish a meaningful relationship with them. This comes very natural
to traditional girls like traditional companies are still largely
concentrated around family life and do not respond well to singles.
Therefore, it is likely that by the time you meet, it has already been at
least 2-3 long-term relationships before. While the guys in traditional
countries may vary between very low and very macho and dominant, women are
almost always naturally gifted to tie you down.
Observe the traditional girls play the long game is quite the masterpiece
because you rarely get what happens if and when it's happening to you. Some
men may consider this as an asset and I am certainly not one to hold it
against the women for their ability to initiate, develop and maintain
long-term relationships, which can lead to starting a family together.
Before you know it, you will find their presence overconsumption in all
areas of your life, unless you are as good long game and stick to your own
objectives, it will be carefully navigated to a path that best fits its
interests, not necessarily yours.
Most men that I have observed, whether business have had with hundreds of
women or to marry their love of youth, usually react very similarly in this
context: they play along to they feel the benefits of the relationship
outweigh the negatives and if it stops being the case, they are in a
situation where it is equally difficult to restore balance and regain
control, as it is to change or leave their partner.
Just a few decades, when family traditions were at their height, a couple
have finally reached this unbalanced state after many years, even decades.
Today, thanks to the Internet and freedom of movement, this time happens
much faster in a relationship, usually before the birth of a child, while
the temptation to choose a path other than the family life still the length
of an arm.
In short, Western women can aspire to relationships and traditional women
can be extremely skilled at it, but unless you're able to time their
presence in your life with your own priorities and long-term goals, you
would end by also feel discontent both, albeit for slightly different
reasons.
3. They do not age well
Women in the countries of Europe and South East Asia seem to have two
states of physical appearance: quite feminine and attractive to a certain
age and then almost immediately and automatically they become a
quasi-material granny (30 late - early 40s). Some would say that this
applies to women in general, but I think that the poor living conditions,
lower access to the consumption of health care, higher alcohol and less
money for plastic surgery and cosmetic expensive are the factors that make
the most significant transition and sudden than in Western women.
Traditional society also plays a big role here, where women say it
is "inappropriate" for someone their age to go to the gym, dress elegantly
or go to bars and clubs, some women thing in the West still do often deep
into their 40s.
Overall, my main point as someone who has (almost) exclusively dated and
mated with traditional women is that even if they seem like a better deal
overall than their Westernized counterparts, they also come with their own
set of fine print you need to understand and accept before opting for a
long-term relationship.
Read more: A traditional role of success Sex
Asia and the Caribbean, are often compared by mainly Western authors in
their US, UK, and their counterparts in Western Europe . Their femininity,
obedience, care and support are highly praised. As someone who grew up in
Eastern Europe (Bulgaria) and spent most of the past five years in the
South Pacific (Philippines), I am surrounded by women basically all my
life, but there some drawbacks to dating this type of woman.
1. Traditional women are very dependent
It is a fact that many girls in poor countries have fewer resources than
men, and if they want a better life, they need someone who can provide them
more resources. This is among the main reasons why Western men have a huge
success in their home country and # 8212; their potential for resource
extraction is recognized immediately.
Not pretend, however, that the masculine role of a "supplier" has upsides.
Usually these girls will be your responsibility throughout your
relationship. If you are dating by the way, you will not feel bad, because
you only pay for a few drinks and meals here and there, but if you consider
entering into a relationship, know that it will be up to you to provide
up 'to the bitter end (or possibly forever, according to the laws on
marriage).
Many traditional women are resourceful and can learn quickly, but they
generally do not spend the time and money to pursue fancy studies, which
could make the feared woman of strong and independent career. If you can
pay the bill and bring another person on the back (with the exception of
all, you can end up having all wonders), then everything should be good.
If you can barely afford to have a good life on your own, when you start
to "provide" chances are you'll find yourself in the situation of a
declining standard of living. I know a lot of guys are excited by the
thought that their wives existence depends on the money they bring home,
and this can be a concern for you if you are responsible, but it is
certainly a factor often neglected to consider before committing to it
anything long term.
2. They are very good long game
My impression from reading the Western women is that the most difficult is
to establish a meaningful relationship with them. This comes very natural
to traditional girls like traditional companies are still largely
concentrated around family life and do not respond well to singles.
Therefore, it is likely that by the time you meet, it has already been at
least 2-3 long-term relationships before. While the guys in traditional
countries may vary between very low and very macho and dominant, women are
almost always naturally gifted to tie you down.
Observe the traditional girls play the long game is quite the masterpiece
because you rarely get what happens if and when it's happening to you. Some
men may consider this as an asset and I am certainly not one to hold it
against the women for their ability to initiate, develop and maintain
long-term relationships, which can lead to starting a family together.
Before you know it, you will find their presence overconsumption in all
areas of your life, unless you are as good long game and stick to your own
objectives, it will be carefully navigated to a path that best fits its
interests, not necessarily yours.
Most men that I have observed, whether business have had with hundreds of
women or to marry their love of youth, usually react very similarly in this
context: they play along to they feel the benefits of the relationship
outweigh the negatives and if it stops being the case, they are in a
situation where it is equally difficult to restore balance and regain
control, as it is to change or leave their partner.
Just a few decades, when family traditions were at their height, a couple
have finally reached this unbalanced state after many years, even decades.
Today, thanks to the Internet and freedom of movement, this time happens
much faster in a relationship, usually before the birth of a child, while
the temptation to choose a path other than the family life still the length
of an arm.
In short, Western women can aspire to relationships and traditional women
can be extremely skilled at it, but unless you're able to time their
presence in your life with your own priorities and long-term goals, you
would end by also feel discontent both, albeit for slightly different
reasons.
3. They do not age well
Women in the countries of Europe and South East Asia seem to have two
states of physical appearance: quite feminine and attractive to a certain
age and then almost immediately and automatically they become a
quasi-material granny (30 late - early 40s). Some would say that this
applies to women in general, but I think that the poor living conditions,
lower access to the consumption of health care, higher alcohol and less
money for plastic surgery and cosmetic expensive are the factors that make
the most significant transition and sudden than in Western women.
Traditional society also plays a big role here, where women say it
is "inappropriate" for someone their age to go to the gym, dress elegantly
or go to bars and clubs, some women thing in the West still do often deep
into their 40s.
Overall, my main point as someone who has (almost) exclusively dated and
mated with traditional women is that even if they seem like a better deal
overall than their Westernized counterparts, they also come with their own
set of fine print you need to understand and accept before opting for a
long-term relationship.
Read more: A traditional role of success Sex
Feminist Move To desexualizing breasts could allow men to crush them with impunity
Touching a woman's breasts without consent is an example of sexual assault
manual (if sufficiently proven in court). Yet a growing number of feminists
argue that the two female breasts and nipples on them should be & # 8221
desexualised. If this rather stupid policy proposal was never implemented,
it would be illogical and unfair indeed for anyone touching a woman's
breasts to ever be accused, let alone convicted of sexual assault.
However, this is exactly what the braindead feminists argue for mass:
As for me, I am happy with the status quo: the breasts are parts of very
sexual body than the male chest, and so laws should exist and be enforced
to prevent these breasts are groped without permission. My only concern (!
And a very big) is with the standards of proof and procedures to prove
someone almost always a man accused actually did sexually assault a woman's
breasts. Otherwise, the laws as they exist today on paper are largely good.
It is generally accepted that a man touching s Pecs will lead to you being
arrested for sexual assault, whether you are male or female. Similarly,
typing on the shoulder of someone very non-sexual is a universally accepted
way to get their attention. If some feminists categories wish desexualizing
breasts and female nipples in line with the male chest and nipples, they
must accept the same results as when we men are always hit on the shoulder
or chest & # 8211; It's not sexual assault that can be alleged or
prosecuted.
Feminist typists type obtained
Back when Cosmopolitan didn t argue that weren t sexualized breasts.
As we expect these high brow publications as Cosmopolitan have expressed
interest desexualizing the nipple and therefore the breasts. The stupidity
of Eliza Thompson article would be hilarious if it were not tragic
implications arguments usually end up like his begetting. In arguing for a
kind of perverse & # equal 8221; treatment to men and women chests, Eliza
advocates that women really should not have recourse to the law of sexual
assault if they find their strength breasts touched or caressed each.
This kind of feminist solipsism probably try to strengthen in claiming that
women can sexualisation and desexualizing their breasts and nipples at
will. Regarding show in public, their breasts are fully desexualised. But
if someone touches the breast, feminists reserve the right to have them
treated as sexually that genitals are. So there is not even a strong field
patina on which to base such a ridiculous proposition Release the nipple or
breast & # desexualizing 8221. It is the female equivalent of a reflex
circle.
How many times women touch your chest?
This fan has a better chance of hitting Nicholas Cage's chest my chance to
touch Miranda Kerr s & # 8211; and for good reason.
It happens all the time for me. Recent examples in my own life include:
Photos taken in a nightclub Bratislava. Through seven images, I spotted
four girls with their dead hand on my breast center, open palm.
I made a joke to a Slovenian birthday girl aged 24 to 24 years is 52 years
of women in the male, so she better hurry up and have children. She
playfully pushed my chest and kept his hands there much longer it should
have.
A friend came behind me in London and grabbed my chest behind to surprise
me.
There was no sexual assault in these cases because in legal terms the adult
male chest is not sexualized, or at least not as sexualized as female
breast. Desexualizing breasts and nipples require a female non-compliance
with laws similar sexual assault to have meaning whatsoever. Combining my
experience with yours and these are exactly the things that feminists have
to accept sometimes they and other women if they succeed in desexualizing
whatever body part they want desexualised.
Of course, many, including myself, continue to deal with breasts as sexual
body parts, and they behave accordingly. Others not. If anything, the Free
Nipple and social retardisms bound represent a desire by feminists to
deliberately inflict harm and sexual assault on other women. Who says women
don t hate?
Breasts are very sexual & # 8211; to benefit women and let # 8217; s keep
it that way
Her boobs are sexualized and for good reason.
Unless a woman is breastfeeding in public (and thank you to those women who
are childless feminists cat lady), there are strong reasons why breasts are
deliberately kept sexualized, socially and in terms of the law.
& # 8221 equality; Men and women coffers is not only a rejection of common
sense, it will promote the actual sexual assault under the flimsy guise of
non-discrimination between the sexes. It is similar to offer equal rights
menstruation when men are not periods.
More: Bizarre College Approach to sexual assault
manual (if sufficiently proven in court). Yet a growing number of feminists
argue that the two female breasts and nipples on them should be & # 8221
desexualised. If this rather stupid policy proposal was never implemented,
it would be illogical and unfair indeed for anyone touching a woman's
breasts to ever be accused, let alone convicted of sexual assault.
However, this is exactly what the braindead feminists argue for mass:
As for me, I am happy with the status quo: the breasts are parts of very
sexual body than the male chest, and so laws should exist and be enforced
to prevent these breasts are groped without permission. My only concern (!
And a very big) is with the standards of proof and procedures to prove
someone almost always a man accused actually did sexually assault a woman's
breasts. Otherwise, the laws as they exist today on paper are largely good.
It is generally accepted that a man touching s Pecs will lead to you being
arrested for sexual assault, whether you are male or female. Similarly,
typing on the shoulder of someone very non-sexual is a universally accepted
way to get their attention. If some feminists categories wish desexualizing
breasts and female nipples in line with the male chest and nipples, they
must accept the same results as when we men are always hit on the shoulder
or chest & # 8211; It's not sexual assault that can be alleged or
prosecuted.
Feminist typists type obtained
Back when Cosmopolitan didn t argue that weren t sexualized breasts.
As we expect these high brow publications as Cosmopolitan have expressed
interest desexualizing the nipple and therefore the breasts. The stupidity
of Eliza Thompson article would be hilarious if it were not tragic
implications arguments usually end up like his begetting. In arguing for a
kind of perverse & # equal 8221; treatment to men and women chests, Eliza
advocates that women really should not have recourse to the law of sexual
assault if they find their strength breasts touched or caressed each.
This kind of feminist solipsism probably try to strengthen in claiming that
women can sexualisation and desexualizing their breasts and nipples at
will. Regarding show in public, their breasts are fully desexualised. But
if someone touches the breast, feminists reserve the right to have them
treated as sexually that genitals are. So there is not even a strong field
patina on which to base such a ridiculous proposition Release the nipple or
breast & # desexualizing 8221. It is the female equivalent of a reflex
circle.
How many times women touch your chest?
This fan has a better chance of hitting Nicholas Cage's chest my chance to
touch Miranda Kerr s & # 8211; and for good reason.
It happens all the time for me. Recent examples in my own life include:
Photos taken in a nightclub Bratislava. Through seven images, I spotted
four girls with their dead hand on my breast center, open palm.
I made a joke to a Slovenian birthday girl aged 24 to 24 years is 52 years
of women in the male, so she better hurry up and have children. She
playfully pushed my chest and kept his hands there much longer it should
have.
A friend came behind me in London and grabbed my chest behind to surprise
me.
There was no sexual assault in these cases because in legal terms the adult
male chest is not sexualized, or at least not as sexualized as female
breast. Desexualizing breasts and nipples require a female non-compliance
with laws similar sexual assault to have meaning whatsoever. Combining my
experience with yours and these are exactly the things that feminists have
to accept sometimes they and other women if they succeed in desexualizing
whatever body part they want desexualised.
Of course, many, including myself, continue to deal with breasts as sexual
body parts, and they behave accordingly. Others not. If anything, the Free
Nipple and social retardisms bound represent a desire by feminists to
deliberately inflict harm and sexual assault on other women. Who says women
don t hate?
Breasts are very sexual & # 8211; to benefit women and let # 8217; s keep
it that way
Her boobs are sexualized and for good reason.
Unless a woman is breastfeeding in public (and thank you to those women who
are childless feminists cat lady), there are strong reasons why breasts are
deliberately kept sexualized, socially and in terms of the law.
& # 8221 equality; Men and women coffers is not only a rejection of common
sense, it will promote the actual sexual assault under the flimsy guise of
non-discrimination between the sexes. It is similar to offer equal rights
menstruation when men are not periods.
More: Bizarre College Approach to sexual assault
Sunday, September 3, 2017
How to improve your Rhetoric
The history of rhetoric & # 8211; the art of verbal persuasion & # 8211;
dates back about 2500 years and its very foundations are usually taught in
high school in the Western Hemisphere. It is also a topic in many
universities worldwide.
The classical Greek philosophers Empodocles, Protagoras, Gorgias,
Isocrates, Plato and Aristotle were all made valuable contributions to this
field. Plato criticized the appearance of unethical dialogue in the
persuasive Gorgias and other ideas in Phaedra. Aristotle was the more
systematic object in his Rhetoric of work. In the Roman Empire Cicero and
Quintilian are some of the best known figures in this regard.
Rhetoric suffered various setbacks throughout history, but regained its
strength and relevance in the 20th and 21 centuries. Although the dark side
of the rhetoric associated with collectivism mass psychology under the
guidance of modern totalitarianism, it is accepted as something important
and probably inevitable in today's world and democratic societies. The left
and the right to use it, although sometimes so completely different.
How about individual male as he enters the world stage, this is a very
small example, and even online to a significant degree? With the triad of
basic rhetorical ethos, logos and pathos as a starting point, I will give
suggestions on how to improve one's ability to persuade and to be
considered a most valuable and respectable person.
genius
Ethos is linked to a person's character, and include a plethora of
different factors such as social status, appearance, experience of life,
moral conduct and behavior. The downside of this aspect is that most men
will not be heard, even if they may have multiple strengths, for the simple
reason that only a few men can become billionaires, celebrities,
politicians or lobbyists. Whether you're smarter than PewDiePie since it
has 56 million subscribers while you have 56 (or at least 56 fixed
hopefully).
However, this does not justify crying because more average man can improve
his life much his particular level and to some extent strive to reach
higher ground. Specifically, it can mean to improve its revenue, body
composition, style of dress, social network, social and ethical capital.
Having a beautiful woman at his side will also be an advantage and make him
look good. Nobody listens losers and why should they?
As for the actual speech, or actio as it is called in rhetoric, trust,
voice, posture and body language while the matter.
Also, do not be a complete macho guy, but do not act as a weak male either.
Find the optimal balance, vary the way you speak, and change somewhat
depending on the audience and context. The practice and actual experience
are essential ingredients. Investigate other men, avoid obvious mistakes,
but find your own unique way of doing it.
Logos
Logos is the intellectual and logical dimension of rhetoric capacity and
affects the way you are able to influence people. I know that many think it
is just a waste of time to go to college, but that concept must be
approached with some caution. Having a master's or doctorate, although it
often has little importance from the simple perspective on income, implies
a certain level of intellectual sophistication and / or creating incentives
to get more knowledge.
Regardless, you should be able to better discern the knowledge and
information to improve your logos. No one has complete knowledge and
sometimes it is wise to just accept that you do not know this or that, but
for example the politics, economics, cultural studies and genetics are not
rock science. Use unimpeachable sources, insofar as they exist, and to
avoid low-value and erroneous studies. Think three times before accepting
mainstream science as truths.
Regarding relevance, facts and logic are not always & # 8211; far from it &
# 8211; win, but that does not mean you should overlook. People will
respect a knowledgeable man, and note that you are well informed. In this
way, a man logos positively affect his philosophy in a benevolent feedback
loop.
Pathetic
Finally, the pathos is related to feelings. A masculine man rejects almost
instinctively, even contempt, emotions.
Yet the wise man knows that emotions affect people in various
circumstances, and often overlap sense of morality as being horrified by
war, rape, murder and other consequences of the darker shades of the psyche
human. Therefore, an appeal to emotions can be significant and will not be
in conflict even more remote and rational image.
I'm not a super big fan Trump but I'll have to admit I love his convincing
way of stating the obvious common sense ideas of good and evil. Instead of
trying to appear as a virtuous man, he says that what is right or wrong,
then moves.
In addition, to be upset is only one type of emotion. Two historical
functions of classical rhetoric were to entertain and please the public.
Wittiness, discussed in Aristotle's The Nicomachean Ethics is considered at
least a lesser virtue. Therefore, a sense of humor is a powerful weapon and
a final part of the arsenal.
However, a delicate balance is needed, and humor is not to be the backbone
of a man's persuasive (if he is not an actor, of course). On the other
hand, he could not possibly be without either.
Conclusion
As illustrated, the three main elements of rhetoric not exclusive but
complementary. logos and pathos strong influence ethical man s in a
positive feedback loop and could be a key to increase gradually to higher
grounds, be it only in the frames of a man's private life and at work, or
socially important occupation as a political or public debater.
Considered in this broader sense, improving the rhetoric becomes almost the
same as the general self-improvement, that transcends the traditional
conduct of the art of speech.
Read more: How to recognize Rhetoric Meaningsless From Masters Of Deception
dates back about 2500 years and its very foundations are usually taught in
high school in the Western Hemisphere. It is also a topic in many
universities worldwide.
The classical Greek philosophers Empodocles, Protagoras, Gorgias,
Isocrates, Plato and Aristotle were all made valuable contributions to this
field. Plato criticized the appearance of unethical dialogue in the
persuasive Gorgias and other ideas in Phaedra. Aristotle was the more
systematic object in his Rhetoric of work. In the Roman Empire Cicero and
Quintilian are some of the best known figures in this regard.
Rhetoric suffered various setbacks throughout history, but regained its
strength and relevance in the 20th and 21 centuries. Although the dark side
of the rhetoric associated with collectivism mass psychology under the
guidance of modern totalitarianism, it is accepted as something important
and probably inevitable in today's world and democratic societies. The left
and the right to use it, although sometimes so completely different.
How about individual male as he enters the world stage, this is a very
small example, and even online to a significant degree? With the triad of
basic rhetorical ethos, logos and pathos as a starting point, I will give
suggestions on how to improve one's ability to persuade and to be
considered a most valuable and respectable person.
genius
Ethos is linked to a person's character, and include a plethora of
different factors such as social status, appearance, experience of life,
moral conduct and behavior. The downside of this aspect is that most men
will not be heard, even if they may have multiple strengths, for the simple
reason that only a few men can become billionaires, celebrities,
politicians or lobbyists. Whether you're smarter than PewDiePie since it
has 56 million subscribers while you have 56 (or at least 56 fixed
hopefully).
However, this does not justify crying because more average man can improve
his life much his particular level and to some extent strive to reach
higher ground. Specifically, it can mean to improve its revenue, body
composition, style of dress, social network, social and ethical capital.
Having a beautiful woman at his side will also be an advantage and make him
look good. Nobody listens losers and why should they?
As for the actual speech, or actio as it is called in rhetoric, trust,
voice, posture and body language while the matter.
Also, do not be a complete macho guy, but do not act as a weak male either.
Find the optimal balance, vary the way you speak, and change somewhat
depending on the audience and context. The practice and actual experience
are essential ingredients. Investigate other men, avoid obvious mistakes,
but find your own unique way of doing it.
Logos
Logos is the intellectual and logical dimension of rhetoric capacity and
affects the way you are able to influence people. I know that many think it
is just a waste of time to go to college, but that concept must be
approached with some caution. Having a master's or doctorate, although it
often has little importance from the simple perspective on income, implies
a certain level of intellectual sophistication and / or creating incentives
to get more knowledge.
Regardless, you should be able to better discern the knowledge and
information to improve your logos. No one has complete knowledge and
sometimes it is wise to just accept that you do not know this or that, but
for example the politics, economics, cultural studies and genetics are not
rock science. Use unimpeachable sources, insofar as they exist, and to
avoid low-value and erroneous studies. Think three times before accepting
mainstream science as truths.
Regarding relevance, facts and logic are not always & # 8211; far from it &
# 8211; win, but that does not mean you should overlook. People will
respect a knowledgeable man, and note that you are well informed. In this
way, a man logos positively affect his philosophy in a benevolent feedback
loop.
Pathetic
Finally, the pathos is related to feelings. A masculine man rejects almost
instinctively, even contempt, emotions.
Yet the wise man knows that emotions affect people in various
circumstances, and often overlap sense of morality as being horrified by
war, rape, murder and other consequences of the darker shades of the psyche
human. Therefore, an appeal to emotions can be significant and will not be
in conflict even more remote and rational image.
I'm not a super big fan Trump but I'll have to admit I love his convincing
way of stating the obvious common sense ideas of good and evil. Instead of
trying to appear as a virtuous man, he says that what is right or wrong,
then moves.
In addition, to be upset is only one type of emotion. Two historical
functions of classical rhetoric were to entertain and please the public.
Wittiness, discussed in Aristotle's The Nicomachean Ethics is considered at
least a lesser virtue. Therefore, a sense of humor is a powerful weapon and
a final part of the arsenal.
However, a delicate balance is needed, and humor is not to be the backbone
of a man's persuasive (if he is not an actor, of course). On the other
hand, he could not possibly be without either.
Conclusion
As illustrated, the three main elements of rhetoric not exclusive but
complementary. logos and pathos strong influence ethical man s in a
positive feedback loop and could be a key to increase gradually to higher
grounds, be it only in the frames of a man's private life and at work, or
socially important occupation as a political or public debater.
Considered in this broader sense, improving the rhetoric becomes almost the
same as the general self-improvement, that transcends the traditional
conduct of the art of speech.
Read more: How to recognize Rhetoric Meaningsless From Masters Of Deception
Why are not the liberals who establish a 50% quota for women for secret service agents and Bodyguards?
Kind social experiences in the military are conducted at an alarming rate,
but the protection of senior US politicians is left & # 8211; surprise,
surprise & # 8211; almost exclusively to men. Although the national
security of Western countries is gradually dismantled by an influx of
military recruits few women qualified persons responsible for directly keep
the evil liberals s way are almost universally male Secret Service agents
and other guards sex body male.
Hillary Clinton, for example, really, really didn t like the idea of
having other members of the sorority protection during his presidential
race 2016:
Unless these very male in search of the secret service agents identify in
some way that women and incorporate a kind of women's quota for recruits.
At least we know that half of the Clinton political machine doesn t support
gender quotas for Secret Service agents.
Alas, senior politicians benefit from the security that the rest of us are
increasingly denied & # 8211; Armed guards physically and mentally
competent, who are almost always men. For all SJW about calling patriarchy
and gender bias, SJW senators and House members, or simply pandering SJWs
in Congress are quite happy to outsource their personal 24/7 security to
men, much, and even deliberately excluding women.
The two best examples of this hypocrisy are the respective uses of the US
Secret Service and police from United States Capitol. The last body is one
of the few law enforcement agencies directly under the control of a
legislature rather than the executive arm of government. However, the
overwhelming majority of frontline Secret Service agents and police from
the United States Capitol heavily armed, are men. No transgender political
or military-oriented women orchestrated by the Obama administration appears
to have made their way into the secret services or emergency response arm
of the Capitol Police.
When common sense returns briefly & # 8211, but for very selfish reasons
When their own asses are online, liberal politicians opt for men to protect
them.
Of course, it all makes perfect sense. Physically women and men
(unimpressive) are a clear responsibility in situations requiring the
protection of government institutions, people or simply be vulnerable, as
shown in the case of a Muslim terrorist who easily disarmed a woman soldier
in Paris busy Orly airport earlier this year.
But for us, the simple common people, our local police officers do not even
have to pass basic fitness tests so we can be protected by them, because
the company needs more women police officers ([ 1] [2]).
Similarly, potential female members of the US Marine Corps currently enjoy
white-knighting of a lifetime courtesy physical standards woefully relaxed,
allowing them to be withheld and paid to the kind of poor conditioning that
would see the male recruits thrown from the army. Even more alarming, this
adoration American and Western wider positive action gender is also that
China knows its unprecedented growth as a global military power.
The only time when all the madness of gender diversity is taking a
permanent vacation
Here is a photograph showing the police the response of United States
Capitol when a woman morotist obviously unstable tried to attack one of
their checkpoints, the checkpoints to protect 550 congressmen of death or
serious injury:
Where are all the women running at full speed and carrying heavy automatic
weapons and semi-automatic? Between early 2007 and early 2011, the
Democrats, whose leaders included the windbag ultra SJW and the House of
Representatives Nancy Pelosi, had all the time in the world to take a stand
for gender equality & # 8221; and mandate a quota of 50% for frontline
policing Capitol of the United States. They had control of Congress, let's
remember. Yet they did nothing.
If equal representation of women are not good enough for the agencies
responsible for the protection of politicians, equal representation (or
anything similar) for such vital institutions as the US military is too
unacceptable. The heavy division of labor in the secret services and the
police of the United States Capitol also mask the very high proportion of
men putting themselves literally on the liberal line, sex-obsessed
politicians experience.
clerical and other civilian uniformed roles give the appearance of a female
labor much when, in fact, very few women will ever face any prospect of
taking a bullet for their boss. Example: 90% of the Secret Service agents
are men, and agents through the exhibition of the Board of great diversity
(pardon the pun) in the particular hazards of their job role.
Only by increasing ridiculously financing their own protection may liberal
politicians pretend gender equality & # 8221; in the secret services and
the Capitol Police
Nancy Pelosi and patriarchy.
The Congress dominated by Republicans recently raised the prospect of an
increase in police funding of United States Capitol, but the Democrats have
done the same thing in the past. This is probably the only way that the
liberal politicians and SJW could make a kind of gender equality in the odd
secret service or the Capitol Police. Instead of a half-dozen agents or
uniformed officers standing with them, a particular person may be given a
dozen.
Whether they choose to ignore the issue altogether or thinking dishonest
ways to promote gender equality & # 8221; regarding their own protection,
politicians from left always to ensure themselves the kind of physical
security as the rest of us could only dream of.
We the public will have the perverse kind of experiences that put us in
danger more, whether the violence of gang banger or military adversary
abroad like China, while the Liberals can top sleep peacefully with the
knowledge that they will always be protected by public funds & # 8211; and
by men.
Read more: The Australian Army which establish a 70% female quota for new
recruits
but the protection of senior US politicians is left & # 8211; surprise,
surprise & # 8211; almost exclusively to men. Although the national
security of Western countries is gradually dismantled by an influx of
military recruits few women qualified persons responsible for directly keep
the evil liberals s way are almost universally male Secret Service agents
and other guards sex body male.
Hillary Clinton, for example, really, really didn t like the idea of
having other members of the sorority protection during his presidential
race 2016:
Unless these very male in search of the secret service agents identify in
some way that women and incorporate a kind of women's quota for recruits.
At least we know that half of the Clinton political machine doesn t support
gender quotas for Secret Service agents.
Alas, senior politicians benefit from the security that the rest of us are
increasingly denied & # 8211; Armed guards physically and mentally
competent, who are almost always men. For all SJW about calling patriarchy
and gender bias, SJW senators and House members, or simply pandering SJWs
in Congress are quite happy to outsource their personal 24/7 security to
men, much, and even deliberately excluding women.
The two best examples of this hypocrisy are the respective uses of the US
Secret Service and police from United States Capitol. The last body is one
of the few law enforcement agencies directly under the control of a
legislature rather than the executive arm of government. However, the
overwhelming majority of frontline Secret Service agents and police from
the United States Capitol heavily armed, are men. No transgender political
or military-oriented women orchestrated by the Obama administration appears
to have made their way into the secret services or emergency response arm
of the Capitol Police.
When common sense returns briefly & # 8211, but for very selfish reasons
When their own asses are online, liberal politicians opt for men to protect
them.
Of course, it all makes perfect sense. Physically women and men
(unimpressive) are a clear responsibility in situations requiring the
protection of government institutions, people or simply be vulnerable, as
shown in the case of a Muslim terrorist who easily disarmed a woman soldier
in Paris busy Orly airport earlier this year.
But for us, the simple common people, our local police officers do not even
have to pass basic fitness tests so we can be protected by them, because
the company needs more women police officers ([ 1] [2]).
Similarly, potential female members of the US Marine Corps currently enjoy
white-knighting of a lifetime courtesy physical standards woefully relaxed,
allowing them to be withheld and paid to the kind of poor conditioning that
would see the male recruits thrown from the army. Even more alarming, this
adoration American and Western wider positive action gender is also that
China knows its unprecedented growth as a global military power.
The only time when all the madness of gender diversity is taking a
permanent vacation
Here is a photograph showing the police the response of United States
Capitol when a woman morotist obviously unstable tried to attack one of
their checkpoints, the checkpoints to protect 550 congressmen of death or
serious injury:
Where are all the women running at full speed and carrying heavy automatic
weapons and semi-automatic? Between early 2007 and early 2011, the
Democrats, whose leaders included the windbag ultra SJW and the House of
Representatives Nancy Pelosi, had all the time in the world to take a stand
for gender equality & # 8221; and mandate a quota of 50% for frontline
policing Capitol of the United States. They had control of Congress, let's
remember. Yet they did nothing.
If equal representation of women are not good enough for the agencies
responsible for the protection of politicians, equal representation (or
anything similar) for such vital institutions as the US military is too
unacceptable. The heavy division of labor in the secret services and the
police of the United States Capitol also mask the very high proportion of
men putting themselves literally on the liberal line, sex-obsessed
politicians experience.
clerical and other civilian uniformed roles give the appearance of a female
labor much when, in fact, very few women will ever face any prospect of
taking a bullet for their boss. Example: 90% of the Secret Service agents
are men, and agents through the exhibition of the Board of great diversity
(pardon the pun) in the particular hazards of their job role.
Only by increasing ridiculously financing their own protection may liberal
politicians pretend gender equality & # 8221; in the secret services and
the Capitol Police
Nancy Pelosi and patriarchy.
The Congress dominated by Republicans recently raised the prospect of an
increase in police funding of United States Capitol, but the Democrats have
done the same thing in the past. This is probably the only way that the
liberal politicians and SJW could make a kind of gender equality in the odd
secret service or the Capitol Police. Instead of a half-dozen agents or
uniformed officers standing with them, a particular person may be given a
dozen.
Whether they choose to ignore the issue altogether or thinking dishonest
ways to promote gender equality & # 8221; regarding their own protection,
politicians from left always to ensure themselves the kind of physical
security as the rest of us could only dream of.
We the public will have the perverse kind of experiences that put us in
danger more, whether the violence of gang banger or military adversary
abroad like China, while the Liberals can top sleep peacefully with the
knowledge that they will always be protected by public funds & # 8211; and
by men.
Read more: The Australian Army which establish a 70% female quota for new
recruits
Friday, September 1, 2017
11 Other ways we Severs Elite Psychologically by conditioning Harmful
Last week, building on the critical work of Lucien & # 8212 Cherry, PhD and
expert in cognitive science and transhumanism & # 8212; I pointed out how
much the occult elite had made "change" the way people think and act for
decades. The project is a kind of giant reprogramming, neurolinguistic
company-wide elite. It is a demiurgic attempt to destroy and recreate, to
do everything and artificial world.
More men and women, but multi-drug abstract individuals pretending to
decide their night "kind"; not more healthy food, but Frankenfoods Monsanto
cultivated; etc. To change a status quo satisfactory centuries, the elite
has taken various roles, chose different scapegoats to take the blame when
needed, our innate ability to distinguish and prioritize impairment,
blurred the difference between truth and fiction . And that was only the
beginning.
All these are in fact the preparatory steps for the more plastic people.
Obviously, a system & # 8212; as they say in Cybernetics & # 8212; which is
unbalanced, riddled with contradictions, and wishing external assistance is
easier to change a stable, healthy and autonomous. Now, in line with the
last piece we cut deeper into exactly how our New Hermetists done that.
1. Trust, trivializing, stigmatizing
One of our categorizations subconscious works built along the lines of:
I can trust,
what is normal or trivial or no importance,
I should be wary.
Common sense, social norms, distinctions between parents and strangers, and
personal experience were more than enough for us to know who or what we
should do. Prejudice arises when this model of thinking becomes too rigid
and hinders daily life. Otherwise, this way of classifying people is
normal, as long as we can get out of punctually autopilot and consider
anyone or anything consciously.
The elite took over this model by changing its content. For example, people
intuitively knew trannyism was a sign of pathology and degeneration, but
now normies transsexuals believe are poor innocent victims who should
either be considered normal & # 8212; hence trivial & # 8212; or
pedestaled. Conversely, a new category has emerged with modernity:
the "extreme right", which existed even before, at best, in the eighteenth
century, became synonymous in the minds of normies with "filthy beast"
people should condemn and reject tirelessly without a thought.
Through cropping, promotion of artificial stories, sympathetic hero leftist
painting or humane contrast to "right" who are always portrayed as stupid
or evil, they shaped a worldview new good and the bad. Keep the old
structure intact, change its contents, and you have changed almost
everything.
2. Karpman triangle: the victim, the executioner and savior
Another model Trinitarian system took built on is what is commonly called
the Triangle Karpman. During an interaction, someone starts getting bossy,
overcritical, control over someone else. The first takes the role
of "persecutor", the second the role of "victim", and a third may come in
aid to second. These are roles in the sense that they are more like holes
or boxes that essential attributes. They may change, and an alleged role
could hide anything.
When politics are framed as a dramatic triangle large scale, as has
happened repeatedly with the creation of each new "minority" and "rights"
average Joe is baited to feel empathy for the alleged victim, hatred
towards the persecutor and the desire to be or to join the rescue party.
This is part of a strategy of polarization, like the scandalous tabloid
headlines. Of course, the repeated use of the torturer savior victim policy
is to reduce a complex nuanced reality, a very simplistic story, Manichean,
and can be used to hide truths against the current.
Behind the traditional world of appearances, the people who play the victim
Biggest Underdogs are also Bossier, the most narcissistic and most
disrespectful & # 8212; in one word, crybullies & # 8212; all deadbeats
struggle to be recognized as victims and not realizing the structure they
are trying to fit in, and the white knights themselves as noble saviors
while they are little more than enablers toxic behavior.
3. Promote empathy, a fusionism world, and the regressive left
The ancient myths speak of a heavenly world, whether inhabited by Adam and
Eve or former golden age Hyperboreans, which proved to divided, scattered,
plagued by war and other misfortunes after a major disaster. The Tower of
Babel story follows the same pattern.
These myths still resonate much in the human psyche. Modern thinkers such
as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx tapped it by inventing a kind
of "natural" or primitive communism inhabited by noble, innocent savages.
This utopian world, they said, had been destroyed by the institution of
private property. So what better way to "fix the world" that the
destruction of private property and establish communism? The same with
caste, class and even gender. If we are different, so uneven, we can all
get along very well as long as there are appropriate limits, acknowledged,
protection of territories, prerogatives and other identity components.
A strong trend within the left is pure hatred of these boundaries and
differences. Everything should merge! No borders! No limits! One World!
After communism ignominiously failed, the occult elite has changed its
strategy. With new-age, they favor "empathy" as a way to lose sight of who
we are and to make men more vulnerable to emotional blackmail. They blamed
the warring aspect of masculinity promoted "communication" and "consensus"
for men bully cats and turn women into men cartoons. Are not our ancestors
sooooo guilty of oppressing the galaxy after all?
4. Confusion between self, others, and the media
People who are too empathetic may confuse their own feelings or beliefs
with others. This is especially true for people who do not know how they
can be manipulated, either because they are young, or because they have
spent their time in an artificial urban world looking artificial images and
lack of testosterone. They are too inclined to empathize with the
characters and viewpoints that are presented with force or suggested to
them, regardless of their authenticity or veracity.
An example of a manual leftist inventing a whole scenario out of the air
and selective empathy and pressing on Twitter. Seeing an unknown Muslim
woman in public transport, (((Rachel Jacobs))) called triangle Karpman and
motives of a story which is a male white-oppressor, the Muslim wife is a
-victime and noble I-Rachel-Jacobs-or-other-SJW-am-the-wild-and-savior.
Jacobs is actually connected to this Muslim woman and fantasize? Is SJWs
retweet #illridewithyou while merging a proto-world, individually or
daydreaming, forgetting their real futility and twitting with their mental
background while conditioned by the media?
Here we have a mixture of invasive narcissism and blue pill credulity
elite. The first project his own ideas about everything else while the
latter submits to the point mentally live in a part of the spirit of the
elite and ignores the reality around.
5. real differences stigmatizing
German jurist Carl Schmitt has unveiled a feature of liberal,
modern 'democratic' 'essential humanism "when he noticed his fundamental
hypocrisy. At first glance, "humanism" celebrates that all humans share,
tolerate differences, while allowing them to "go beyond" to a beautiful and
harmonious brotherhood. But in fact, "humanism" threatening to cannibalize
all cultures, nations and lifestyles. "Humanism" destroys the possibility
of living in peace with different and unequal people and evilizes up what
he can not include. If you are not a "humanist", you are not completely
human!
So, having differences allegedly destroyed or included, which is exactly
the same when "including" means someone or something that makes another
brand, "humanism" or progressivism creates a new otherness. This is not
national or geographical but political. All human beings should be
cannibalized in the new unit, but beware of the "extreme right", this black
sheep who dares to be different!
After their knowledge was impaired by artificial inability to discriminate
or prioritize, normies can have their brain functions normally again when
they meet again at least with otherness. At least the good and bad guys!
God bless Trump for us liberals to feel superior!
Again, destroy and rebuild: the virus of the mind '60s prevented
distinctive, hierarchies, imitation, and now normies can do anything new &
# 8212; the distinction between "good" refugees and "bad" evil white male
hierarchy between the inestimable suffering of "micro-agressed" Princess
and the unworthy beta male, imitate or follow the media touted "causes".
Not to mention the typical carrot "look, we will have a beautiful and
perfectly beautiful world, we just need to remove before ... X and Y ...
and Z ..." Just say X is "racist "or Y" -phobic "and that will be enough.
Pavlovian conditioning is as simple as that.
6. Blocking access to new information
"The reality is a far right hoax! "
This may seem irrelevant in the information age is known. We have the
Internet, books, communication around countless free ... how could we lack
information? Simple: "the real deal" overloaded with new information and
stimuli, the typical individual of what is put in front of him
as "precious," "legit" or those who follow this lead end, once again,
living within a closed system and blocking anything that might threaten
their shared narrative.
In France, I have seen many bourgeois bohemians include globalists Le Monde
religiously. Their "newspaper of record" nothing about reality, it does. On
the other side of the pond even upper middle class breeding occurs with the
New York Times. As society disintegrates into small antagonistic groups,
mass disoriented and members of the Hive decide to go on sharing the same
illusion.
Hence the development of the source rather than objective truth and # 8212;
and why, as long as the outputs of the system will repeat these myths that
the gender gap, they continue to believe, no matter how it is actually
discredited.
Postmodernism went to deny the principle of non-contradiction, and the
existence of objective truth. In the world of false or traditional media,
authorized outlets belonging-Hive are seen as if they were the truth.
Notice how we are here to believe: it is as if truth could be produced or
manufactured first-hand, as if everything was a "social construction"
subject to the whims of our demiurges managers. Race does not exist! Race
exists, but this is "social"! White genocide does not exist! White erasure
is great!
I had the same experience with journalists quoting each other of my books
without any effort to go to my writings, my experience is that most
journalists, academics, professionals and others in similar professions
read wrong not the original sources, but the other, largely because they
need to find consensus before deciding.
- Nassim Taleb Antifragile, chap.23
7. Cut ties with the family, with the dissidents, the promotion of social
autism
Once the external information was blocked, those who share the same
illusion tend to sever their remaining ties with those who do not. large
family meal when they drive the typical blue pill to meet relatives pilled
red, are generally avoidance quagmire, sham, passive aggressiveness or a
manifest conflict. twentysomethings dyed hair will return their
grandparents for -iste or -phobic.
Do you know what type of movement leads its members to cut all ties to
their parents and the past history? totalitarianism, cultish do. Under his
smooth facade mainstreamism ordered its members not only to follow but also
convert their friends and relatives & # 8212; or otherize, ridiculous, and
finally rejected. Thus, the bubble becomes thicker and especially members
alone together, everyone more or less share the same appearance of reality.
8. Impairment of critical thought, the destruction of the capacity to
manage assumptions feels Muh
In this context, there is no room for doubt. The same used to be day by day
conditioning numbs the mind. When I started philosophy, I remember that
most if not all the students tried to find simple answers to immediate
major philosophical questions, as if the question was an unbearable
condition. It is true that the realization of the assumptions may be part
of an imaginary self, but the handling and weight requires more than
scrolling down a news feed or watch Game of Cucks.
SJWs act as if they were absolutely right because they have no concept of
probability or hypothesis. The very idea of weighting alternative
versions seems anathema to their "feel. "Instead, what they show is
impatience, intolerance to frustration, rigid thinking, he hides behind"
smart "or reference" witty "hysteria, clowning, or pure nonsense.
9. Reward this shit with narcissism and pass
"If you are a good disciple, you pussies happens if women, labels for
signaling virtue, if women and victimhood points if the minority. Be
transblack, transgender and openly autistic ask the Big Victimhood
tournament! "
10. Neophilia
As I said last week, targets people must want the virus of the mind or an
updated version of it. making them addicted to fashion, fashion, and the
next big thing has several functions: they are obviously more malleable,
more likely to follow the media, eager to fit in the bubble so that their
mental universe does not crash , able to spend their money on the next
iPhone or other.
On a deeper level, neophilia is a key element of what some sociologists dub
the "liquid society". After the paterfamilias was killed, there is no core
values, no stable internal structuring. Reviews are fluid & # 8212; they
dropwise from one box to another so that the transition is smooth. We will
pedophilia shoved down the throat, but not now, for the elite still needs
to include polygamy and early adolescents before they begin to also
nourishing obviously on children. The mainstream is just that, a river.
11. Anti-Oedipus
Wait a few more steps in the "equality" and "inclusion"
Just as gender roles, "heteronormativity" was until recently something so
obvious and normal, it does not even need to be put into words. Using the
vocabulary of cognitive science, we could say that "heteronormativity" and
the rejection of incest are integrated parts of any normal mind. These
parts must be applied a little in education. The male child is to be
separated from his mother and make male activities. He can not do what he
wants, or if it does, it will never grow.
Borrowing for the overrated Deleuze and Guattari, their concept discovers
Cherry "Anti-Oedipus" as meaning exactly the opposite of that. If you ban
bans, so limit the reach of children becomes criminalized, or worse, if you
encourage children to go beyond the limits that must meet, what you get is
fuzzy boundaries, a lack of sense the identity and the desire to "regress"
to be one with the mother.
This may sound a bit far-fetched. Yet when we see how incestuous powerful
tribe, well, maybe all the clutter we have faced decades about sex is a
sign that we live in a world they shaped all too. This can also be a good
sign because it shows that if they are to pull the strings, they must show
in some way and can never maintain a complete invisibility.
Read more: 8 Ways You Severed By psychic Conditioning of Harmful
expert in cognitive science and transhumanism & # 8212; I pointed out how
much the occult elite had made "change" the way people think and act for
decades. The project is a kind of giant reprogramming, neurolinguistic
company-wide elite. It is a demiurgic attempt to destroy and recreate, to
do everything and artificial world.
More men and women, but multi-drug abstract individuals pretending to
decide their night "kind"; not more healthy food, but Frankenfoods Monsanto
cultivated; etc. To change a status quo satisfactory centuries, the elite
has taken various roles, chose different scapegoats to take the blame when
needed, our innate ability to distinguish and prioritize impairment,
blurred the difference between truth and fiction . And that was only the
beginning.
All these are in fact the preparatory steps for the more plastic people.
Obviously, a system & # 8212; as they say in Cybernetics & # 8212; which is
unbalanced, riddled with contradictions, and wishing external assistance is
easier to change a stable, healthy and autonomous. Now, in line with the
last piece we cut deeper into exactly how our New Hermetists done that.
1. Trust, trivializing, stigmatizing
One of our categorizations subconscious works built along the lines of:
I can trust,
what is normal or trivial or no importance,
I should be wary.
Common sense, social norms, distinctions between parents and strangers, and
personal experience were more than enough for us to know who or what we
should do. Prejudice arises when this model of thinking becomes too rigid
and hinders daily life. Otherwise, this way of classifying people is
normal, as long as we can get out of punctually autopilot and consider
anyone or anything consciously.
The elite took over this model by changing its content. For example, people
intuitively knew trannyism was a sign of pathology and degeneration, but
now normies transsexuals believe are poor innocent victims who should
either be considered normal & # 8212; hence trivial & # 8212; or
pedestaled. Conversely, a new category has emerged with modernity:
the "extreme right", which existed even before, at best, in the eighteenth
century, became synonymous in the minds of normies with "filthy beast"
people should condemn and reject tirelessly without a thought.
Through cropping, promotion of artificial stories, sympathetic hero leftist
painting or humane contrast to "right" who are always portrayed as stupid
or evil, they shaped a worldview new good and the bad. Keep the old
structure intact, change its contents, and you have changed almost
everything.
2. Karpman triangle: the victim, the executioner and savior
Another model Trinitarian system took built on is what is commonly called
the Triangle Karpman. During an interaction, someone starts getting bossy,
overcritical, control over someone else. The first takes the role
of "persecutor", the second the role of "victim", and a third may come in
aid to second. These are roles in the sense that they are more like holes
or boxes that essential attributes. They may change, and an alleged role
could hide anything.
When politics are framed as a dramatic triangle large scale, as has
happened repeatedly with the creation of each new "minority" and "rights"
average Joe is baited to feel empathy for the alleged victim, hatred
towards the persecutor and the desire to be or to join the rescue party.
This is part of a strategy of polarization, like the scandalous tabloid
headlines. Of course, the repeated use of the torturer savior victim policy
is to reduce a complex nuanced reality, a very simplistic story, Manichean,
and can be used to hide truths against the current.
Behind the traditional world of appearances, the people who play the victim
Biggest Underdogs are also Bossier, the most narcissistic and most
disrespectful & # 8212; in one word, crybullies & # 8212; all deadbeats
struggle to be recognized as victims and not realizing the structure they
are trying to fit in, and the white knights themselves as noble saviors
while they are little more than enablers toxic behavior.
3. Promote empathy, a fusionism world, and the regressive left
The ancient myths speak of a heavenly world, whether inhabited by Adam and
Eve or former golden age Hyperboreans, which proved to divided, scattered,
plagued by war and other misfortunes after a major disaster. The Tower of
Babel story follows the same pattern.
These myths still resonate much in the human psyche. Modern thinkers such
as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx tapped it by inventing a kind
of "natural" or primitive communism inhabited by noble, innocent savages.
This utopian world, they said, had been destroyed by the institution of
private property. So what better way to "fix the world" that the
destruction of private property and establish communism? The same with
caste, class and even gender. If we are different, so uneven, we can all
get along very well as long as there are appropriate limits, acknowledged,
protection of territories, prerogatives and other identity components.
A strong trend within the left is pure hatred of these boundaries and
differences. Everything should merge! No borders! No limits! One World!
After communism ignominiously failed, the occult elite has changed its
strategy. With new-age, they favor "empathy" as a way to lose sight of who
we are and to make men more vulnerable to emotional blackmail. They blamed
the warring aspect of masculinity promoted "communication" and "consensus"
for men bully cats and turn women into men cartoons. Are not our ancestors
sooooo guilty of oppressing the galaxy after all?
4. Confusion between self, others, and the media
People who are too empathetic may confuse their own feelings or beliefs
with others. This is especially true for people who do not know how they
can be manipulated, either because they are young, or because they have
spent their time in an artificial urban world looking artificial images and
lack of testosterone. They are too inclined to empathize with the
characters and viewpoints that are presented with force or suggested to
them, regardless of their authenticity or veracity.
An example of a manual leftist inventing a whole scenario out of the air
and selective empathy and pressing on Twitter. Seeing an unknown Muslim
woman in public transport, (((Rachel Jacobs))) called triangle Karpman and
motives of a story which is a male white-oppressor, the Muslim wife is a
-victime and noble I-Rachel-Jacobs-or-other-SJW-am-the-wild-and-savior.
Jacobs is actually connected to this Muslim woman and fantasize? Is SJWs
retweet #illridewithyou while merging a proto-world, individually or
daydreaming, forgetting their real futility and twitting with their mental
background while conditioned by the media?
Here we have a mixture of invasive narcissism and blue pill credulity
elite. The first project his own ideas about everything else while the
latter submits to the point mentally live in a part of the spirit of the
elite and ignores the reality around.
5. real differences stigmatizing
German jurist Carl Schmitt has unveiled a feature of liberal,
modern 'democratic' 'essential humanism "when he noticed his fundamental
hypocrisy. At first glance, "humanism" celebrates that all humans share,
tolerate differences, while allowing them to "go beyond" to a beautiful and
harmonious brotherhood. But in fact, "humanism" threatening to cannibalize
all cultures, nations and lifestyles. "Humanism" destroys the possibility
of living in peace with different and unequal people and evilizes up what
he can not include. If you are not a "humanist", you are not completely
human!
So, having differences allegedly destroyed or included, which is exactly
the same when "including" means someone or something that makes another
brand, "humanism" or progressivism creates a new otherness. This is not
national or geographical but political. All human beings should be
cannibalized in the new unit, but beware of the "extreme right", this black
sheep who dares to be different!
After their knowledge was impaired by artificial inability to discriminate
or prioritize, normies can have their brain functions normally again when
they meet again at least with otherness. At least the good and bad guys!
God bless Trump for us liberals to feel superior!
Again, destroy and rebuild: the virus of the mind '60s prevented
distinctive, hierarchies, imitation, and now normies can do anything new &
# 8212; the distinction between "good" refugees and "bad" evil white male
hierarchy between the inestimable suffering of "micro-agressed" Princess
and the unworthy beta male, imitate or follow the media touted "causes".
Not to mention the typical carrot "look, we will have a beautiful and
perfectly beautiful world, we just need to remove before ... X and Y ...
and Z ..." Just say X is "racist "or Y" -phobic "and that will be enough.
Pavlovian conditioning is as simple as that.
6. Blocking access to new information
"The reality is a far right hoax! "
This may seem irrelevant in the information age is known. We have the
Internet, books, communication around countless free ... how could we lack
information? Simple: "the real deal" overloaded with new information and
stimuli, the typical individual of what is put in front of him
as "precious," "legit" or those who follow this lead end, once again,
living within a closed system and blocking anything that might threaten
their shared narrative.
In France, I have seen many bourgeois bohemians include globalists Le Monde
religiously. Their "newspaper of record" nothing about reality, it does. On
the other side of the pond even upper middle class breeding occurs with the
New York Times. As society disintegrates into small antagonistic groups,
mass disoriented and members of the Hive decide to go on sharing the same
illusion.
Hence the development of the source rather than objective truth and # 8212;
and why, as long as the outputs of the system will repeat these myths that
the gender gap, they continue to believe, no matter how it is actually
discredited.
Postmodernism went to deny the principle of non-contradiction, and the
existence of objective truth. In the world of false or traditional media,
authorized outlets belonging-Hive are seen as if they were the truth.
Notice how we are here to believe: it is as if truth could be produced or
manufactured first-hand, as if everything was a "social construction"
subject to the whims of our demiurges managers. Race does not exist! Race
exists, but this is "social"! White genocide does not exist! White erasure
is great!
I had the same experience with journalists quoting each other of my books
without any effort to go to my writings, my experience is that most
journalists, academics, professionals and others in similar professions
read wrong not the original sources, but the other, largely because they
need to find consensus before deciding.
- Nassim Taleb Antifragile, chap.23
7. Cut ties with the family, with the dissidents, the promotion of social
autism
Once the external information was blocked, those who share the same
illusion tend to sever their remaining ties with those who do not. large
family meal when they drive the typical blue pill to meet relatives pilled
red, are generally avoidance quagmire, sham, passive aggressiveness or a
manifest conflict. twentysomethings dyed hair will return their
grandparents for -iste or -phobic.
Do you know what type of movement leads its members to cut all ties to
their parents and the past history? totalitarianism, cultish do. Under his
smooth facade mainstreamism ordered its members not only to follow but also
convert their friends and relatives & # 8212; or otherize, ridiculous, and
finally rejected. Thus, the bubble becomes thicker and especially members
alone together, everyone more or less share the same appearance of reality.
8. Impairment of critical thought, the destruction of the capacity to
manage assumptions feels Muh
In this context, there is no room for doubt. The same used to be day by day
conditioning numbs the mind. When I started philosophy, I remember that
most if not all the students tried to find simple answers to immediate
major philosophical questions, as if the question was an unbearable
condition. It is true that the realization of the assumptions may be part
of an imaginary self, but the handling and weight requires more than
scrolling down a news feed or watch Game of Cucks.
SJWs act as if they were absolutely right because they have no concept of
probability or hypothesis. The very idea of weighting alternative
versions seems anathema to their "feel. "Instead, what they show is
impatience, intolerance to frustration, rigid thinking, he hides behind"
smart "or reference" witty "hysteria, clowning, or pure nonsense.
9. Reward this shit with narcissism and pass
"If you are a good disciple, you pussies happens if women, labels for
signaling virtue, if women and victimhood points if the minority. Be
transblack, transgender and openly autistic ask the Big Victimhood
tournament! "
10. Neophilia
As I said last week, targets people must want the virus of the mind or an
updated version of it. making them addicted to fashion, fashion, and the
next big thing has several functions: they are obviously more malleable,
more likely to follow the media, eager to fit in the bubble so that their
mental universe does not crash , able to spend their money on the next
iPhone or other.
On a deeper level, neophilia is a key element of what some sociologists dub
the "liquid society". After the paterfamilias was killed, there is no core
values, no stable internal structuring. Reviews are fluid & # 8212; they
dropwise from one box to another so that the transition is smooth. We will
pedophilia shoved down the throat, but not now, for the elite still needs
to include polygamy and early adolescents before they begin to also
nourishing obviously on children. The mainstream is just that, a river.
11. Anti-Oedipus
Wait a few more steps in the "equality" and "inclusion"
Just as gender roles, "heteronormativity" was until recently something so
obvious and normal, it does not even need to be put into words. Using the
vocabulary of cognitive science, we could say that "heteronormativity" and
the rejection of incest are integrated parts of any normal mind. These
parts must be applied a little in education. The male child is to be
separated from his mother and make male activities. He can not do what he
wants, or if it does, it will never grow.
Borrowing for the overrated Deleuze and Guattari, their concept discovers
Cherry "Anti-Oedipus" as meaning exactly the opposite of that. If you ban
bans, so limit the reach of children becomes criminalized, or worse, if you
encourage children to go beyond the limits that must meet, what you get is
fuzzy boundaries, a lack of sense the identity and the desire to "regress"
to be one with the mother.
This may sound a bit far-fetched. Yet when we see how incestuous powerful
tribe, well, maybe all the clutter we have faced decades about sex is a
sign that we live in a world they shaped all too. This can also be a good
sign because it shows that if they are to pull the strings, they must show
in some way and can never maintain a complete invisibility.
Read more: 8 Ways You Severed By psychic Conditioning of Harmful
When the worries of overseas life begin to Add Up
The cashier at the restaurant handed me the credit card terminal. I slid my
card in the terminal, as I had done many times before. As the printed
receipt, I removed the card from the terminal, too, as I had done many
times before. It was then she yelled at me.
She spoke a language I did not understand. Slavic. But his tone was
unmistakable. She was upset. Then she changed into English:
"Why do you remove the card !! It was not done. Now it's all bad ".
She called the employee younger male on. I guess he was correct any
problems that I talked with the credit card machine. As she finished
speaking to him in their native language, he turned to me in the same tone
angry.
"You can not remove the card !!! Why do you do that?!?! It has not been
done, you should not have done that ".
Like I n t understand the first time. Finally, I hit back.
"I KNOW. I understand that it was not ready. This printed, I thought it was
done. You can now stop crying".
Everyone behind me in line looked a little disoriented. I had it. I was a
paying customer, and then I realized it was my fault, I'm not going to sit
there and yelled at. I simply defended their tones. As I left the
restaurant, I took out my phone and connected to my bank's mobile
application.
There were two identical loads the restaurant. The first was through many,
as I had suspected. It was at this point & # 8230; I missed home.
Soviet medicine & # 8230;
The doctor
I woke up to the fifth day in a row with a headache and a bit light-headed.
I got out of bed, and poured my coffee in the morning in the hope that it
would solve the problem. For the fifth consecutive day, he did not. What I
had first taken was the nasty jet lag showed symptoms of infection nasty
sinus of all kinds.
I sent several offices "general practitioners" that day after their phone
number has never taken, asking when they go open, and how much it would
cost a foreigner to get a basic health check for the probable sinus
infection. A week later, I had heard nothing.
The symptoms continued. I was always tired. I was not getting my work. I
was cranky and irritable. My girlfriend tried to call around. A clinic, she
could get a hold of told him they could see me & # 8230; in 3 weeks. I
started researching natural remedies for sinus infections, thinking that I
would just be a doctor myself if no doctor in this country wanted to take
my money and give me a prescription.
For the next three days, I swallowed raw garlic with this wicked concoction
I had thought and hoped it would go. For two days, I felt like a genius.
Then the symptoms returned. Finally, on Friday afternoon I went to Google
and found a new doctor in the street. I entered its Soviet-style office.
All his "office" was a room with two offices and a patient "table".
She said she could see me right then and there. She conducted a review on
me while I sat on a plastic chair next to his desk. She wrote me a
prescription, and I paid a reasonable $ 25 for a 5-minute service. A week
later, the symptoms persisted. I felt scammed. It was at this point & #
8230; I missed home.
the delivery guy
I expected an expensive package to be delivered by DHL. I expected to be
around all day. My apartment has four doors locked before ringing at my
door, so I had to be. All morning, I heard nothing. At 11:41, I refreshed
my tracking page and was met disaray.
"11:32: Invalid address, please contact DHL to confirm the contact. "
I called DHL. Apparently, the number the driver had been wrong.
ME: "Did the driver think to contact the alternate order number? "
DHL, "No."
"OK & # 8230 ;? Can you have the file to the local DHL "(A five minutes
from me)
"No."
"Why?"
"Because. You can get this package tonight, at the warehouse DHL. At any
time after 18 hours, I think." (This warehouse is a 1 1 round trip time for
me)
"Are you sure he will be there at 18 o'clock? "
"No. Maybe 19 hours may be 20 hours. I don know".
I sigh.
I ventured to the warehouse & # 8212; my journey involving two subway lines
and an old Soviet-style school bus. The driver was angry with me that I n t
have exact change & # 8212; it wasn t included bus on my all-city transit
passes, unbeknownst to me (hindsight is 20/20, I just take Uber).
I finally made it to DHL and give me back my parcel. As I stood in the
grass, desolate field in the middle-of-nowhere waiting for the bus back
while holding $ 1000 + the value of electronics in my hand, I wondered what
the hell I was doing with my life.
It was at this point & # 8230; I missed home.
Closing thoughts
It is these moments that make me might wonder if people are when they think
I'm crazy for having moved abroad. It is these moments that make me wonder
if I can really live abroad for the rest of my life.
I'll admit, at first, some of them seem small. I consider it the price to
pay for living abroad, and live a life free of all poisons of Western
culture. But no matter how you are patient and tolerant, these things can
and will eat you. The little things on a daily basis do you wear over time.
What was once a fresh and unique adventure & # 8212; DHL venture in the
boonies, for example & # 8212; is a huge waste of time and frustration.
These three stories are just a handful of deal with on a regular basis
consistent things expatriates. If you're on shorter trips, you do not even
notice these things. It's the long term, you lose patience. And your only
choice is to suck it up and deal, or return to your country of origin.
Ultimately, what I realized is the & # 8212; no place is perfect.
If you want to learn how to get more dates, check out my free guide. For
more articles, visit my blog This is the problem.
Learn more: 6 Rules For All Expats should live
card in the terminal, as I had done many times before. As the printed
receipt, I removed the card from the terminal, too, as I had done many
times before. It was then she yelled at me.
She spoke a language I did not understand. Slavic. But his tone was
unmistakable. She was upset. Then she changed into English:
"Why do you remove the card !! It was not done. Now it's all bad ".
She called the employee younger male on. I guess he was correct any
problems that I talked with the credit card machine. As she finished
speaking to him in their native language, he turned to me in the same tone
angry.
"You can not remove the card !!! Why do you do that?!?! It has not been
done, you should not have done that ".
Like I n t understand the first time. Finally, I hit back.
"I KNOW. I understand that it was not ready. This printed, I thought it was
done. You can now stop crying".
Everyone behind me in line looked a little disoriented. I had it. I was a
paying customer, and then I realized it was my fault, I'm not going to sit
there and yelled at. I simply defended their tones. As I left the
restaurant, I took out my phone and connected to my bank's mobile
application.
There were two identical loads the restaurant. The first was through many,
as I had suspected. It was at this point & # 8230; I missed home.
Soviet medicine & # 8230;
The doctor
I woke up to the fifth day in a row with a headache and a bit light-headed.
I got out of bed, and poured my coffee in the morning in the hope that it
would solve the problem. For the fifth consecutive day, he did not. What I
had first taken was the nasty jet lag showed symptoms of infection nasty
sinus of all kinds.
I sent several offices "general practitioners" that day after their phone
number has never taken, asking when they go open, and how much it would
cost a foreigner to get a basic health check for the probable sinus
infection. A week later, I had heard nothing.
The symptoms continued. I was always tired. I was not getting my work. I
was cranky and irritable. My girlfriend tried to call around. A clinic, she
could get a hold of told him they could see me & # 8230; in 3 weeks. I
started researching natural remedies for sinus infections, thinking that I
would just be a doctor myself if no doctor in this country wanted to take
my money and give me a prescription.
For the next three days, I swallowed raw garlic with this wicked concoction
I had thought and hoped it would go. For two days, I felt like a genius.
Then the symptoms returned. Finally, on Friday afternoon I went to Google
and found a new doctor in the street. I entered its Soviet-style office.
All his "office" was a room with two offices and a patient "table".
She said she could see me right then and there. She conducted a review on
me while I sat on a plastic chair next to his desk. She wrote me a
prescription, and I paid a reasonable $ 25 for a 5-minute service. A week
later, the symptoms persisted. I felt scammed. It was at this point & #
8230; I missed home.
the delivery guy
I expected an expensive package to be delivered by DHL. I expected to be
around all day. My apartment has four doors locked before ringing at my
door, so I had to be. All morning, I heard nothing. At 11:41, I refreshed
my tracking page and was met disaray.
"11:32: Invalid address, please contact DHL to confirm the contact. "
I called DHL. Apparently, the number the driver had been wrong.
ME: "Did the driver think to contact the alternate order number? "
DHL, "No."
"OK & # 8230 ;? Can you have the file to the local DHL "(A five minutes
from me)
"No."
"Why?"
"Because. You can get this package tonight, at the warehouse DHL. At any
time after 18 hours, I think." (This warehouse is a 1 1 round trip time for
me)
"Are you sure he will be there at 18 o'clock? "
"No. Maybe 19 hours may be 20 hours. I don know".
I sigh.
I ventured to the warehouse & # 8212; my journey involving two subway lines
and an old Soviet-style school bus. The driver was angry with me that I n t
have exact change & # 8212; it wasn t included bus on my all-city transit
passes, unbeknownst to me (hindsight is 20/20, I just take Uber).
I finally made it to DHL and give me back my parcel. As I stood in the
grass, desolate field in the middle-of-nowhere waiting for the bus back
while holding $ 1000 + the value of electronics in my hand, I wondered what
the hell I was doing with my life.
It was at this point & # 8230; I missed home.
Closing thoughts
It is these moments that make me might wonder if people are when they think
I'm crazy for having moved abroad. It is these moments that make me wonder
if I can really live abroad for the rest of my life.
I'll admit, at first, some of them seem small. I consider it the price to
pay for living abroad, and live a life free of all poisons of Western
culture. But no matter how you are patient and tolerant, these things can
and will eat you. The little things on a daily basis do you wear over time.
What was once a fresh and unique adventure & # 8212; DHL venture in the
boonies, for example & # 8212; is a huge waste of time and frustration.
These three stories are just a handful of deal with on a regular basis
consistent things expatriates. If you're on shorter trips, you do not even
notice these things. It's the long term, you lose patience. And your only
choice is to suck it up and deal, or return to your country of origin.
Ultimately, what I realized is the & # 8212; no place is perfect.
If you want to learn how to get more dates, check out my free guide. For
more articles, visit my blog This is the problem.
Learn more: 6 Rules For All Expats should live
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)