I am proud to announce that we have added a second Red Kings Shop T-shirt.
It features my enormous head printed on a high quality 100% cotton black
shirt Los Angeles clothing brand that is made in the USA.
As with the official shirt ROK that we launched a few months ago, you will
experience these benefits:
increase in testosterone 900% (more than insanely provides kratom) *
Cause mental break any liberal who sees your shirt *
Rapid extension of 9 inches of your penis (doubled my size) *
immediate gain 120 pounds in your bench press *
A more voracious attention of beautiful women appropriate animal breeding *
The reduction of body fat at least 10% *
* The above claims are not independently verified, and perhaps a Roosh
attempt to sell more shirts
If you're enjoying articles on ROK and want to support our activities,
visit the RedKings Shop and buy your shirt today. If you don t Get a chance
to buy our first shirt you can buy both and save on shipping. Your shirt
(s) will be shipped in the week when you place your order. As always, your
support is much appreciated.
Click here to visit Red Kings Shop.
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
What I learned about women from my long-term relationships
I d like to share some things I've learned about women's relationships I've
had. Much of this experience comes the girls from the East, who are more
feminine than American girls, but I think the true nature of women is the
same no matter where you go, hiding under whatever the external
presentation and behavior.
1. They lie a lot
The men assert their interests by logic, domination and physical strength.
Women say their interests by the beauty, cunning, and deception. A young
girl's interest in a relationship that can not overlap with yours, and use
its strengths to maintain this interest. Lying is one of the ways it
manages the relationship in its desired destination, and this is often done
unconsciously to the point where it can actually believe the lies she tells
you.
Girls who are more or moral good & # 8221; compared to the other may still
lie by omission. Because they feel some guilt with bold face lies, they
rather craft stories that leave damaging facts that can make him lose power
or standing in the relationship. Lying by omission requires careful editor
in their minds who are meticulous about the suppression of details that can
cause problems, especially in their encounters with other men.
For example, imagine a girl asking her man what he did during the day. He
answers, I came across a girl I knew today and we had a cup of tea & #
8221. He was walking home from work, suddenly recognized a girl, he went to
college with, jumped a cafe to talk about old friends for twenty minutes,
then gave him a handshake goodbye without touching suggestive flirting.
Now imagine a man asking a girl the same question. She answers, I came
across a guy I knew today and we had a cup of tea & # 8221. The event took
place in the same way that man, right? False. What happened was an old
flame contacted her on Facebook, they exchanged dozens of messages included
suggestive kiss emoticons, he asked him to meet at a specific time over
coffee, they went in and talked for two hours, legs touched under the
table, they recounted a drunken connecting past, they walked into a nearby
lake where touch more accessory happened, and then they finally said
goodbye to the guys did not get a lips kissing and having to settle for a
playful grab her ass.
What she said to her boyfriend of the event was not a lie in his mind, but
he thinks that the event took place in the same way if he told her. As you
can see, ask a girl to tell an event you get closer to the truth, because
the truth would harm its position in the relationship. The truth can only
be discovered after asking specific questions.
How do you know this guy?
Do you hang with him in the past?
How long were you coffee?
Did he try to touch you?
Where did you go after coffee?
What exactly did you talk about?
How he said goodbye to you?
This is exhausting for you to perform, but it may be prudent if you suspect
a certain meeting. If she hesitates to answer, you attend his editing work
mechanism, and presumably it rose from lying by omission to outright lie.
2. They're time vampires
The comic late Patrice O Neal, who dropped tons of advice on red pill
Relations Philip Black Show, called vampires time women & # 8221. He
described how men, the sexual act is the real the fun part of being with a
woman, but a woman, just having time to spend on them man is sex. They like
to be removed, doted, entertain, and so on. This explains why they go on
dates with men they do not even like because getting out and being hounded
& # 8221; a man is so strong validation.
The men just want sex, some privacy, a dining companion or watching movies,
and space. Women want sex, cuddling and conversation endless hours on
anything important. She wants her man to be a problem solver, a
psychologist, warrior, and punching bag all in one, and even if you meet
these requirements, it ever will, because it's in his nature to keep
extract value.
Whatever the reason, a woman finds it impossible to be alone. They'll spend
time with someone they hate, or who they are intensely jealous, to be
alone. A woman rather a gaggle of friends gay, and hear constantly talking
about sex butt and watch documentaries or read old books. Their biggest
fear in life is to be alone, something that many men really want. A man
would not spend time with someone he does not like the fear of being alone
because it's during his time alone he can recharge his batteries and
experiences treat.
When a girl identifies you as a romantic friend, what she really found a
friend time, someone who can now spend dozens of hours a week with her,
just so she doesn t have to be with her own mind. For men who do not value
their time alone, which causes most of the relational conflicts, but given
that the cat feels so good, we continue to make the sacrifice, as we have
done for millennia.
3. They have nothing to do in their lives
Waiting in line for a cupcake
time vampires need other people's time because they have nothing to do in
their own lives. Men have interests and hobbies that can occupy them
constantly. I have days without human contact while working on a book
project or a website, and didn t feel particularly distressed.
The gift women t have hobbies or interests that are not external
projections of how they wish to see. Their interest in the primary life of
men, because men allow them to build an image to others that they want to
be considered: a good friend, a loving daughter, a girl another man
earnestly desires a woman sexy, an honorable woman, and so on. The man is a
necessary accessory in this operation, which is why it is so common for a
girl to dive into a long term relationship, and professes her love for a
man to cheat on him the weakest of pulses. The relationship serves as
validation of how she wants to be seen, not who she really is. The gap
between who she wants to be and that it is actually gets supported by its
advanced streamlined mechanism that prevents it from accepting it is rather
clueless and made serious mistakes.
It s relationships with men who give definition to his life, because
outside of it, it has that new Facebook, Instagram, trends of pop, a
mind-numbing work, and friends who speak mainly men, gossip, text messaging
and feminine hygiene. Besides the work pursued in part to have more weight
in its relations with men by not needing their money (compared to many men
who really love their job), it has no identity she can call her own, no
interest in the land, no passion that are not related to men and to be
considered attractive by them.
The above is a nice way of saying that: if women were judged by how they
judge men, they d be losers. Put a dick on just about all the women you
know and watch it instantly turn into a loser, who is addicted to social
media, overpriced restaurants, toxic entertainment, and endless validation
foreigners. The biggest loser male is accomplished, talented and qualified
as the biggest winner woman, and the only reason why very few girls are
considered losers is because they have a cat, and nearly all cats feel
good, no matter who it's attached.
4. They are unable to see their own hypocrisy
Women hold you to a standard, to the threat of dumping if you break when
she does not take this norm. They do the same things they wouldn t want you
to do, and rationalize by saying that it is actually s Doing different,
when in all likelihood, it is even worse. They remember everything you
said, even there for years, but can t see a behavior they did last week
that contradicts its standards for you.
Women have no objective or legal standard and thus no way to identify
whether they are good or bad anything. Instead, they use pure emotion to
guide their behavior. If they feel good, then it must be right. If they
feel bad then he should not be. Since emotions can distort the perception
anyway, it will simply do what she wants to do and find an emotional way or
a wrong strain of logic to convince her he was right.
The most amazing performance I've seen in women is denying something that
you had to do. You can show them proven right in their face, and they deny
it, then find a way to blame you. I was warned about it, but was skeptical
until I got the experience. It is such an unreliable witness to his own
behavior there may be no point in ever an explanation of his nothing. If
you don t know the facts about something, and need history to get the
facts, you'll never practice.
5. It takes a village to keep a woman monogamous
I don HEAL how an alpha male you are, or how tight your game is, but if you
are the only positive influence in your girlfriend or wife's life, and
everything else around it pushes her to feed her primary need of fun,
pleasure, and the men of higher status, you will have burned. You will not
provide an oasis of tradition and monogamy if everything else is
programming for feminism and promiscuity. You might be able to keep it
together for a few months, a few years, maybe even ten years, but
eventually collapse.
I've learned that having the game is only half the component to maintaining
a healthy relationship. The other half is to have it in an environment that
hers told. Cherish your man, be faithful, have children and # 8221;
Otherwise, you will lose. We're all products of our environment if we want
to admit it or not, but it has even more impact women because they work on
the consensus of others.
If everyone started to jump off a bridge tomorrow, too, because it's social
proof that satisfies it is an activity that it would feel good doing it. On
the other hand, men act in the hierarchy, and we follow only top dogs. If
everyone jumps from the bridge, but our chef doesn t, we do not jump the
bridge. A man will not be followed by a crowd of men weak because they are
many, unlike a woman who thinks that participation in the majority will
feel good by lowering the chance of being rejected or put to gap of a group.
For one of my relationships, I tried to create a serene bubble of
patriarchy and goodness, and it worked for a while, but eventually I lost
on Facebook, his friends, his relatives to promiscuity and majority
degenerate. By dating a girl you date the world around her, and if this
world is sick, a negative result is inevitable.
6. The red flags are red for a reason
If a girl has done what you consider a red flag, you know it will not be
suitable for long-term relationship. But when you really like a girl, and
emotion begins to cloud your logic, you find a way to turn a red flag on a
yellow flag. You ignore the advice of friends, ignorant instinct, and start
looking for green flags as insignificant to warrant against-weight
relationship until everything falls apart.
A woman shares do not lie. I repeat: a woman's actions do not lie. His
words are an unreliable witness and should be ignored. The way she acts and
behaves is who she is, not what it says. If his actions tell you it's not
quality material, don t make her a woman. The problem is that people are so
caught up in a girl's beauty and pussy they are actively trying to
transform the ho or feminist in a housewife.
I can now see the futility of asking a girl how many partners she was with.
You will not ever get the truth. A girl has more incentive to lie about it,
and other characteristics of its past, so look at his actions instead. How
is comfortable with sex? How pretty she was in the beginning you? How are
her slutty friends? From these observations, you will be able to guess a
number, even if she tries to lie about his actions by playing hard to get
with you specifically. If a girl couldn & # 8217; t resist your game, it
can also t resist playing many other men.
Conclusion
Regarding relationships, my standards are incredibly high, and I'll be the
first to admit that, but s based on the logic of modern relationships and
the fact that I don t want to experience a divorce like my parents . If a
woman marries the wrong man, divorce is easy for her. She gets the kids,
the house, the monthly payments, and community support to be so brave. If a
man marries the wrong woman, his life is ruined. It gets depression,
misery, suicidal thoughts and children are programmed to hate him. Who
should be more careful about any decision to enter into a long term
relationship that can lead to children?
I have high standards of relationships because the stakes are high, so I'll
use my knowledge of the true nature of women, which I spelled here, and
then use logic to determine which woman may be the mother of my children .
If I ignore the true nature, I enjoy happiness for perhaps a few years (if
I m lucky) until the hammer is about me, and I m left in a miserable
position relative to an ex which is galloping away with my property and
children. I m at the point in my life where I would t mind having children,
but I'm also a man who can accept being alone. The latter is probably a
better option than being a victim of something I could have predicted would
happen.
This article was originally published on Roosh V.
Learn more: The dangers of romantic love
had. Much of this experience comes the girls from the East, who are more
feminine than American girls, but I think the true nature of women is the
same no matter where you go, hiding under whatever the external
presentation and behavior.
1. They lie a lot
The men assert their interests by logic, domination and physical strength.
Women say their interests by the beauty, cunning, and deception. A young
girl's interest in a relationship that can not overlap with yours, and use
its strengths to maintain this interest. Lying is one of the ways it
manages the relationship in its desired destination, and this is often done
unconsciously to the point where it can actually believe the lies she tells
you.
Girls who are more or moral good & # 8221; compared to the other may still
lie by omission. Because they feel some guilt with bold face lies, they
rather craft stories that leave damaging facts that can make him lose power
or standing in the relationship. Lying by omission requires careful editor
in their minds who are meticulous about the suppression of details that can
cause problems, especially in their encounters with other men.
For example, imagine a girl asking her man what he did during the day. He
answers, I came across a girl I knew today and we had a cup of tea & #
8221. He was walking home from work, suddenly recognized a girl, he went to
college with, jumped a cafe to talk about old friends for twenty minutes,
then gave him a handshake goodbye without touching suggestive flirting.
Now imagine a man asking a girl the same question. She answers, I came
across a guy I knew today and we had a cup of tea & # 8221. The event took
place in the same way that man, right? False. What happened was an old
flame contacted her on Facebook, they exchanged dozens of messages included
suggestive kiss emoticons, he asked him to meet at a specific time over
coffee, they went in and talked for two hours, legs touched under the
table, they recounted a drunken connecting past, they walked into a nearby
lake where touch more accessory happened, and then they finally said
goodbye to the guys did not get a lips kissing and having to settle for a
playful grab her ass.
What she said to her boyfriend of the event was not a lie in his mind, but
he thinks that the event took place in the same way if he told her. As you
can see, ask a girl to tell an event you get closer to the truth, because
the truth would harm its position in the relationship. The truth can only
be discovered after asking specific questions.
How do you know this guy?
Do you hang with him in the past?
How long were you coffee?
Did he try to touch you?
Where did you go after coffee?
What exactly did you talk about?
How he said goodbye to you?
This is exhausting for you to perform, but it may be prudent if you suspect
a certain meeting. If she hesitates to answer, you attend his editing work
mechanism, and presumably it rose from lying by omission to outright lie.
2. They're time vampires
The comic late Patrice O Neal, who dropped tons of advice on red pill
Relations Philip Black Show, called vampires time women & # 8221. He
described how men, the sexual act is the real the fun part of being with a
woman, but a woman, just having time to spend on them man is sex. They like
to be removed, doted, entertain, and so on. This explains why they go on
dates with men they do not even like because getting out and being hounded
& # 8221; a man is so strong validation.
The men just want sex, some privacy, a dining companion or watching movies,
and space. Women want sex, cuddling and conversation endless hours on
anything important. She wants her man to be a problem solver, a
psychologist, warrior, and punching bag all in one, and even if you meet
these requirements, it ever will, because it's in his nature to keep
extract value.
Whatever the reason, a woman finds it impossible to be alone. They'll spend
time with someone they hate, or who they are intensely jealous, to be
alone. A woman rather a gaggle of friends gay, and hear constantly talking
about sex butt and watch documentaries or read old books. Their biggest
fear in life is to be alone, something that many men really want. A man
would not spend time with someone he does not like the fear of being alone
because it's during his time alone he can recharge his batteries and
experiences treat.
When a girl identifies you as a romantic friend, what she really found a
friend time, someone who can now spend dozens of hours a week with her,
just so she doesn t have to be with her own mind. For men who do not value
their time alone, which causes most of the relational conflicts, but given
that the cat feels so good, we continue to make the sacrifice, as we have
done for millennia.
3. They have nothing to do in their lives
Waiting in line for a cupcake
time vampires need other people's time because they have nothing to do in
their own lives. Men have interests and hobbies that can occupy them
constantly. I have days without human contact while working on a book
project or a website, and didn t feel particularly distressed.
The gift women t have hobbies or interests that are not external
projections of how they wish to see. Their interest in the primary life of
men, because men allow them to build an image to others that they want to
be considered: a good friend, a loving daughter, a girl another man
earnestly desires a woman sexy, an honorable woman, and so on. The man is a
necessary accessory in this operation, which is why it is so common for a
girl to dive into a long term relationship, and professes her love for a
man to cheat on him the weakest of pulses. The relationship serves as
validation of how she wants to be seen, not who she really is. The gap
between who she wants to be and that it is actually gets supported by its
advanced streamlined mechanism that prevents it from accepting it is rather
clueless and made serious mistakes.
It s relationships with men who give definition to his life, because
outside of it, it has that new Facebook, Instagram, trends of pop, a
mind-numbing work, and friends who speak mainly men, gossip, text messaging
and feminine hygiene. Besides the work pursued in part to have more weight
in its relations with men by not needing their money (compared to many men
who really love their job), it has no identity she can call her own, no
interest in the land, no passion that are not related to men and to be
considered attractive by them.
The above is a nice way of saying that: if women were judged by how they
judge men, they d be losers. Put a dick on just about all the women you
know and watch it instantly turn into a loser, who is addicted to social
media, overpriced restaurants, toxic entertainment, and endless validation
foreigners. The biggest loser male is accomplished, talented and qualified
as the biggest winner woman, and the only reason why very few girls are
considered losers is because they have a cat, and nearly all cats feel
good, no matter who it's attached.
4. They are unable to see their own hypocrisy
Women hold you to a standard, to the threat of dumping if you break when
she does not take this norm. They do the same things they wouldn t want you
to do, and rationalize by saying that it is actually s Doing different,
when in all likelihood, it is even worse. They remember everything you
said, even there for years, but can t see a behavior they did last week
that contradicts its standards for you.
Women have no objective or legal standard and thus no way to identify
whether they are good or bad anything. Instead, they use pure emotion to
guide their behavior. If they feel good, then it must be right. If they
feel bad then he should not be. Since emotions can distort the perception
anyway, it will simply do what she wants to do and find an emotional way or
a wrong strain of logic to convince her he was right.
The most amazing performance I've seen in women is denying something that
you had to do. You can show them proven right in their face, and they deny
it, then find a way to blame you. I was warned about it, but was skeptical
until I got the experience. It is such an unreliable witness to his own
behavior there may be no point in ever an explanation of his nothing. If
you don t know the facts about something, and need history to get the
facts, you'll never practice.
5. It takes a village to keep a woman monogamous
I don HEAL how an alpha male you are, or how tight your game is, but if you
are the only positive influence in your girlfriend or wife's life, and
everything else around it pushes her to feed her primary need of fun,
pleasure, and the men of higher status, you will have burned. You will not
provide an oasis of tradition and monogamy if everything else is
programming for feminism and promiscuity. You might be able to keep it
together for a few months, a few years, maybe even ten years, but
eventually collapse.
I've learned that having the game is only half the component to maintaining
a healthy relationship. The other half is to have it in an environment that
hers told. Cherish your man, be faithful, have children and # 8221;
Otherwise, you will lose. We're all products of our environment if we want
to admit it or not, but it has even more impact women because they work on
the consensus of others.
If everyone started to jump off a bridge tomorrow, too, because it's social
proof that satisfies it is an activity that it would feel good doing it. On
the other hand, men act in the hierarchy, and we follow only top dogs. If
everyone jumps from the bridge, but our chef doesn t, we do not jump the
bridge. A man will not be followed by a crowd of men weak because they are
many, unlike a woman who thinks that participation in the majority will
feel good by lowering the chance of being rejected or put to gap of a group.
For one of my relationships, I tried to create a serene bubble of
patriarchy and goodness, and it worked for a while, but eventually I lost
on Facebook, his friends, his relatives to promiscuity and majority
degenerate. By dating a girl you date the world around her, and if this
world is sick, a negative result is inevitable.
6. The red flags are red for a reason
If a girl has done what you consider a red flag, you know it will not be
suitable for long-term relationship. But when you really like a girl, and
emotion begins to cloud your logic, you find a way to turn a red flag on a
yellow flag. You ignore the advice of friends, ignorant instinct, and start
looking for green flags as insignificant to warrant against-weight
relationship until everything falls apart.
A woman shares do not lie. I repeat: a woman's actions do not lie. His
words are an unreliable witness and should be ignored. The way she acts and
behaves is who she is, not what it says. If his actions tell you it's not
quality material, don t make her a woman. The problem is that people are so
caught up in a girl's beauty and pussy they are actively trying to
transform the ho or feminist in a housewife.
I can now see the futility of asking a girl how many partners she was with.
You will not ever get the truth. A girl has more incentive to lie about it,
and other characteristics of its past, so look at his actions instead. How
is comfortable with sex? How pretty she was in the beginning you? How are
her slutty friends? From these observations, you will be able to guess a
number, even if she tries to lie about his actions by playing hard to get
with you specifically. If a girl couldn & # 8217; t resist your game, it
can also t resist playing many other men.
Conclusion
Regarding relationships, my standards are incredibly high, and I'll be the
first to admit that, but s based on the logic of modern relationships and
the fact that I don t want to experience a divorce like my parents . If a
woman marries the wrong man, divorce is easy for her. She gets the kids,
the house, the monthly payments, and community support to be so brave. If a
man marries the wrong woman, his life is ruined. It gets depression,
misery, suicidal thoughts and children are programmed to hate him. Who
should be more careful about any decision to enter into a long term
relationship that can lead to children?
I have high standards of relationships because the stakes are high, so I'll
use my knowledge of the true nature of women, which I spelled here, and
then use logic to determine which woman may be the mother of my children .
If I ignore the true nature, I enjoy happiness for perhaps a few years (if
I m lucky) until the hammer is about me, and I m left in a miserable
position relative to an ex which is galloping away with my property and
children. I m at the point in my life where I would t mind having children,
but I'm also a man who can accept being alone. The latter is probably a
better option than being a victim of something I could have predicted would
happen.
This article was originally published on Roosh V.
Learn more: The dangers of romantic love
Monday, July 31, 2017
Seduce the world with the Gospel red pill or be destroyed
I claim to be a leader of men, who wages war against evil constantly and
mercilessly. I also ask to be a protector of the weak who will stop at the
enemy.
Some groaned and complained that unrealistic, self-reports enlarging. And
yet, I assure you, my rhetoric is deliberately and without imposing
complex. My prose is calculated. There is method to my madness. Let me
explain.
Over the past two years, I strolled violently on a very strict truth -
facts, reason and logic are not as important as I thought they were.
Emotions reason to win, always. Why? Because reason can rationalize and
justify, but motivating emotion.
Scott Adams, philosopher and expert on persuasion helped shape those views,
and this article is based on several of his brilliant ideas. I'm here on
the shoulders of this intellectual giant (and others).
Reason and logic are male
Although the reason, common sense and logic are the capital that men used
to drive civilization forward, to bring us to the moon, and to heal all
sorts of ailments and diseases, they are ineffective when are used to
communicate to the general masses, and those of lower intelligence.
This is especially the case when it comes to women. Dr. Jordan Peterson
surgically extrapolated the consequences of our historical gender roles
have affected our political values and the way we view reality. Where men
have pushed each other to explore, to produce, to invent, to protect and
build, women were responsible for the distribution of resources through
the "group". As such, in the minds of women, equality and equity outweigh
conscientious virtues associated with male output (which are much more
dependent done).
Fairness and equality are emotionally driven, but the efforts of men of the
production and gathering of resources require a hard realism. Our male
ancestors needed to repel vicious predators for resources. They needed to
go, to lift and to develop strategies to protect their women and children
items and barbarian armies. These efforts are not emotionally bound. They
depend on the intelligence, reason and pragmatism.
Why President Trump is a monster to the left
For these reasons, many women left, and their views President Trump beta
male orbiters, effeminate so differently than male men. Where masculine men
(as readers of this blog) see a great builder, a brilliant and persuade a
man motivated by pragmatic common sense (ie build a wall to keep illegal
migrants), the women left seen as a monster that threatens their ability to
redistribute resources to those who are "vulnerable" and "oppressed".
Evangelizing the left and bring it out of its collective madness, we will
adopt this message centered emotionally. This is the only way to reach the
hearts and minds of those leads equality, culturally suicidal modern women.
Let me be clear. We will remain firm and steadfast in our views. But our
message will have to change and evolve, if we want to survive the impending
feminist dark ages, and continue to build this movement.
Our enemies use nuclear weapons while we use swords
For if we grope in the manosphere with facts and figures, using the
masculine virtues of reason and logic, our enemies in the radical left
social justice and their allies Alphabet Soup Nazi (LGBTQRSTUV etc ..)
deploy methods that are far superior - they appeal to the emotions and
feelings of the masses, even if those calls are devoid of truth and
reality. And the left, eat with the same vigor as solid play comes on a
young woman with "Daddy Issues".
These truths were also exposed by veterans of the game, but in a different
context. Too often we men, especially those who have IQ above average,
reason and logic, so that we are powerless fact, unable to communicate and
speak an emotional language, less intelligent than women understand and so
desperately desire.
At that time feminized history (maybe the first), where many men have
adopted a perspective based on equity centered women, we must redirect our
powers of seduction to seduce the masses to adopt our political views.
As "game", political seduction will be a continuing focus on emotionally.
We will need to taunt and titillate our ideas in the spirit of collective
time and slowly and vigorously push and penetrate our dogma in the female
sphere, so that our superior seed survival and self-preservation bring us a
new offspring more male political, sane.
Where once we relied on moral arguments, pragmatic, we must develop them
into views based on emotions that appeal to fairness and equality.
Example 1 & # 8211; Abortion should be illegal
Let us examine how it might play in a pro-life / anti-abortion argument:
While I, and many here condemn abortion for moral depravity, and the harsh
reality that destroys the demographic continuity and eliminates a woman's
sense of self-responsibility, emotional argument based / equity talked to a
leftist look like this: Why is it fair for you to kill the fetus that would
turn into human beings, so that you were able to survive in such a
situation and become a human being?
Example 2 & # 8211; The West should avoid importing massive amounts of & #
8221 refugees;
Another example refers to the mass migration of alien hordes. The
manosphere argument looks like this: it is wrong to import massive amounts
of people with lower values than us because they can not integrate with
the rest of society, causing social chaos (Exhibit A - Eastern
Europe 'Where is). This makes sense for moral reasons and common sensical.
An emotional argument based / equity looks like this: allow mass migration
is not fair to the people of the working class, which will bear the brunt
of the adverse effects of migration patterns.
If left counters with their relativistic nonsense and say that these
migrants will not be pressure on social resources, but an advantage
(because "diversity is our strength"), the other argument would be: migrant
mass import is unfair since it is spoiler and predator. We must stop
bombarding Westerner their homeland and move, sending them on dangerous
journeys where they put in serious danger of death. It is unfair to those
developing countries which we then tear their young men and women, causing
demographic imbalances for them.
These arguments are not morally or pragmatically oriented. They are lower
because they are motivated by fairness and equality, but the conclusion is
the same - abortion should be illegal / foreign migrants should not be
imported en masse to the West. To evangelize and spread the gospel of red
pill, we must begin to appeal to the emotions of the left.
Know your audience
Back to my biography, I write these things because they are designed to
invigorate and inspire you & # 8211; my fellow dissidents & # 8211; so that
together we can get western countries. My prose changes depending on the
audience I am addressing.
On our quest to recover the western land then we will need to win the
hearts and minds of the masses, speaking their language, by appealing to
their emotions and their sense of fairness and equality. We must change our
prose accordingly. While alien hordes knocking at our doors, our seduction
skills can very well save our societies. For us to survive, we must seduce,
charm, manipulate and enchant the voter.
Only then can we raise our movement basement, into the mainstream, where we
will achieve great victories for Christianity, for freedom and truth. We
will protect our women, we will defend our brothers, and we will defeat the
enemies that torment us Mundialist like demons.
Learn more: The US government will Delaying Full Backs and War Project for
Women
mercilessly. I also ask to be a protector of the weak who will stop at the
enemy.
Some groaned and complained that unrealistic, self-reports enlarging. And
yet, I assure you, my rhetoric is deliberately and without imposing
complex. My prose is calculated. There is method to my madness. Let me
explain.
Over the past two years, I strolled violently on a very strict truth -
facts, reason and logic are not as important as I thought they were.
Emotions reason to win, always. Why? Because reason can rationalize and
justify, but motivating emotion.
Scott Adams, philosopher and expert on persuasion helped shape those views,
and this article is based on several of his brilliant ideas. I'm here on
the shoulders of this intellectual giant (and others).
Reason and logic are male
Although the reason, common sense and logic are the capital that men used
to drive civilization forward, to bring us to the moon, and to heal all
sorts of ailments and diseases, they are ineffective when are used to
communicate to the general masses, and those of lower intelligence.
This is especially the case when it comes to women. Dr. Jordan Peterson
surgically extrapolated the consequences of our historical gender roles
have affected our political values and the way we view reality. Where men
have pushed each other to explore, to produce, to invent, to protect and
build, women were responsible for the distribution of resources through
the "group". As such, in the minds of women, equality and equity outweigh
conscientious virtues associated with male output (which are much more
dependent done).
Fairness and equality are emotionally driven, but the efforts of men of the
production and gathering of resources require a hard realism. Our male
ancestors needed to repel vicious predators for resources. They needed to
go, to lift and to develop strategies to protect their women and children
items and barbarian armies. These efforts are not emotionally bound. They
depend on the intelligence, reason and pragmatism.
Why President Trump is a monster to the left
For these reasons, many women left, and their views President Trump beta
male orbiters, effeminate so differently than male men. Where masculine men
(as readers of this blog) see a great builder, a brilliant and persuade a
man motivated by pragmatic common sense (ie build a wall to keep illegal
migrants), the women left seen as a monster that threatens their ability to
redistribute resources to those who are "vulnerable" and "oppressed".
Evangelizing the left and bring it out of its collective madness, we will
adopt this message centered emotionally. This is the only way to reach the
hearts and minds of those leads equality, culturally suicidal modern women.
Let me be clear. We will remain firm and steadfast in our views. But our
message will have to change and evolve, if we want to survive the impending
feminist dark ages, and continue to build this movement.
Our enemies use nuclear weapons while we use swords
For if we grope in the manosphere with facts and figures, using the
masculine virtues of reason and logic, our enemies in the radical left
social justice and their allies Alphabet Soup Nazi (LGBTQRSTUV etc ..)
deploy methods that are far superior - they appeal to the emotions and
feelings of the masses, even if those calls are devoid of truth and
reality. And the left, eat with the same vigor as solid play comes on a
young woman with "Daddy Issues".
These truths were also exposed by veterans of the game, but in a different
context. Too often we men, especially those who have IQ above average,
reason and logic, so that we are powerless fact, unable to communicate and
speak an emotional language, less intelligent than women understand and so
desperately desire.
At that time feminized history (maybe the first), where many men have
adopted a perspective based on equity centered women, we must redirect our
powers of seduction to seduce the masses to adopt our political views.
As "game", political seduction will be a continuing focus on emotionally.
We will need to taunt and titillate our ideas in the spirit of collective
time and slowly and vigorously push and penetrate our dogma in the female
sphere, so that our superior seed survival and self-preservation bring us a
new offspring more male political, sane.
Where once we relied on moral arguments, pragmatic, we must develop them
into views based on emotions that appeal to fairness and equality.
Example 1 & # 8211; Abortion should be illegal
Let us examine how it might play in a pro-life / anti-abortion argument:
While I, and many here condemn abortion for moral depravity, and the harsh
reality that destroys the demographic continuity and eliminates a woman's
sense of self-responsibility, emotional argument based / equity talked to a
leftist look like this: Why is it fair for you to kill the fetus that would
turn into human beings, so that you were able to survive in such a
situation and become a human being?
Example 2 & # 8211; The West should avoid importing massive amounts of & #
8221 refugees;
Another example refers to the mass migration of alien hordes. The
manosphere argument looks like this: it is wrong to import massive amounts
of people with lower values than us because they can not integrate with
the rest of society, causing social chaos (Exhibit A - Eastern
Europe 'Where is). This makes sense for moral reasons and common sensical.
An emotional argument based / equity looks like this: allow mass migration
is not fair to the people of the working class, which will bear the brunt
of the adverse effects of migration patterns.
If left counters with their relativistic nonsense and say that these
migrants will not be pressure on social resources, but an advantage
(because "diversity is our strength"), the other argument would be: migrant
mass import is unfair since it is spoiler and predator. We must stop
bombarding Westerner their homeland and move, sending them on dangerous
journeys where they put in serious danger of death. It is unfair to those
developing countries which we then tear their young men and women, causing
demographic imbalances for them.
These arguments are not morally or pragmatically oriented. They are lower
because they are motivated by fairness and equality, but the conclusion is
the same - abortion should be illegal / foreign migrants should not be
imported en masse to the West. To evangelize and spread the gospel of red
pill, we must begin to appeal to the emotions of the left.
Know your audience
Back to my biography, I write these things because they are designed to
invigorate and inspire you & # 8211; my fellow dissidents & # 8211; so that
together we can get western countries. My prose changes depending on the
audience I am addressing.
On our quest to recover the western land then we will need to win the
hearts and minds of the masses, speaking their language, by appealing to
their emotions and their sense of fairness and equality. We must change our
prose accordingly. While alien hordes knocking at our doors, our seduction
skills can very well save our societies. For us to survive, we must seduce,
charm, manipulate and enchant the voter.
Only then can we raise our movement basement, into the mainstream, where we
will achieve great victories for Christianity, for freedom and truth. We
will protect our women, we will defend our brothers, and we will defeat the
enemies that torment us Mundialist like demons.
Learn more: The US government will Delaying Full Backs and War Project for
Women
The history of female Viagra Got approved to fight against "sexism"
On 18 August 2015, the FDA approved the first treatment for "sexual desire
disorder." A pill was appointed Addyi approved for the treatment "acquired,
generalized disorder hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in
premenopausal women." Before this drug, there was no treatment approved by
the FDA for women with low libido.
This seems like a good deal, right? Finally, women have their version of
Viagra. It is not in the mood? Let's give him a pill and it will DTF.
Give her a pill and it ll in the mood
Since the early millennia, Big Pharma has invested considerable resources
trying to develop a cure for low female libido. As we know, this is not
just really worry about people welfare, but from a perspective greedy. If
Big Pharma can get addicted women better sex, it will provide a new cash
flow that will last for decades (or more). Also, if you think about it -
have a good sex life can also relieve stress, boredom and decrees to reduce
the divorce rate. Sounds like a win-win.
We can not have a drug without naming a disease. The solution was
to "identify" as a disorder. DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders) named in 2000 "gender dysphoria and gender" as HSDD
(hypoactive sexual desire disorder). This means that premature ejaculation,
paraphilia (fetishism), analloerotic (having no sexual interest in other
people) and lack of sexual desire are in that category.
Now that the "disorder" has been identified, the public was & # 8221
studied; who needs a low sex drive to be tracked and monitored.
I'm not in the mood. Try another day
Mala? fides
After a few years in the laboratory, it seems that there was a light at the
end of a tunnel. Boehringer Ingelheim, a German pharmaceutical company, was
able to synthesize a new antidepressant called flibanserin. The company
noted that some of the participants reported an increase in their sex
drive. Looks a revised Viagra story. The clinical trial was based on
pre-menopausal women - young women are not yet reproductively useless.
The trial divided the subjects into 2 groups randomly. Each day, each
subject was asked to rate their libido on a 4-point scale (0 - no desire,
intense desire 3). The trial found that there was no particular difference
between the groups.
Moreover, it seems that, taking flibanserin, there were side effects:
dizziness, drowsiness, and nausea. Based on these, the FDA rejected the new
drug based on the benefits of risk and failure to demonstrate a statistical
effect on sexual desire and entry criteria too restrictive for the two
Phase 3 trials . the message was received and Boehringer Ingelheim has
decided not to throw money at a time.
Throwing money after bad money is not a calculated step
Human garbage is gold with another man. A new pharmaceutical company called
Sprout Pharmaceuticals think they can win the gold. In fact, the looks of
it, the founders thought exactly that. They approached and Boehringer
Ingelheim bought the rights to flibanserin, after raising $ 20M. Sprout was
led by Cindy and Robert Whitehead who both had extensive experience in the
pharmaceutical industry.
Cindy and Robert Whitehead
They looked comments from the FDA decided to change tactics. Instead of a
daily report, it has become a ratio of 4 weeks (which means that the
subjects reported every week over the last four weeks). It smelled bad - we
all know that the longer you wait with subjective feelings reports (and
desire is totally subjective), more prone to error is. The company
resubmitted the drug to the FDA in 2013. The FDA rejected again based on
the same risk / benefit ratio.
What do you do when the government refuses to give you a license to print
money? You lobby and use the classic straw man - feminism. The advocacy
group created company called even the score D.C. and began using feminist
language to shame the establishment and call the FDA "macho". They went
after and MPs have to write letters to the FDA. They went to a campaign.
Here one of the ads:
The pressure worked, but it was noticed even by BuzzFeed, which we all know
is not a harsh critique of liberal / feminist policies. In 2015, the FDA
approved the drug for commercial use, even if nothing changed
fundamentally. You can read the pressure in the output:
The FDA has recognized for some time the challenges involved in the
development of treatments for female sexual dysfunction.
Since feminists love to beat the drum on equality, it is important to note
that there is no treatment for men:
Before approving Addyi, there was no treatment approved by the FDA for
disorders of sexual desire in men or women.
Downhill and fast
Immediately after the approval, Sprout Pharmaceuticals was acquired by
Valeant Pharmaceuticals for the modest sum of $ 1 billion. Valeant think,
but they had a lot going for them. However, as stated Murphy's
Law: "Whatever can go wrong will go wrong. "- as the" female Viagra ".
Valeant had a practice of buying drugs and then driving them up prices. It
was all good, until the government has noticed. It was in October 2015.
Worse, Valeant has doubled the price of Addyi to $ 800. Addyi also faces
the problem of distribution, Valeant has chosen a company called Philidor,
which went bankrupt shortly.
Yes. He was also quick
Sprout shareholders angered by Valeant practice, have contacted the
management of Valeant and demanded explanations. The height of it was
deposited in November last complaint is always set in court. Sales in 2016
were poor - about $ 10 million worldwide. Viagra comparison is not
flattering - it sold $ 788m in its first year on the market. Valeant is now
bleeding money, and its largest shareholder sold in March this year at a
reported loss of $ 2.8 billion.
Conclusion
Yes. I'm a billion dollars and all I had to do is to manipulate the
government
This is a story of greed and abuse of power. It shows how the state can be
easily handled using tactics of "macho" of humiliation. Furthermore, the
only people to come on top Sprout Pharmaceuticals shareholders are led by
founders who had completed and just changed their pockets. It was almost
a "hit and force" business plan. Everyone connected to the "pink Viagra"
paid a heavy price. It was also a clear case where feminism was nothing
more than a vessel for a lot of money. Who cares about health, when big
money is on the line?
From the point of view red pill, we know that a woman's sexual desire is a
fluid and fickle phenomenon. Everything can not be repaired by drugs and
chemicals. Life is more than measurable quantities. In any case, we all
expect to see if and when a "female Viagra" real will on the market - how
many women actually use. Women thwart nature hypergamious not communicate
that to have a satisfying sexual relationship with a beta.
Read more: The anti-feminism wisdom of the Bible
disorder." A pill was appointed Addyi approved for the treatment "acquired,
generalized disorder hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in
premenopausal women." Before this drug, there was no treatment approved by
the FDA for women with low libido.
This seems like a good deal, right? Finally, women have their version of
Viagra. It is not in the mood? Let's give him a pill and it will DTF.
Give her a pill and it ll in the mood
Since the early millennia, Big Pharma has invested considerable resources
trying to develop a cure for low female libido. As we know, this is not
just really worry about people welfare, but from a perspective greedy. If
Big Pharma can get addicted women better sex, it will provide a new cash
flow that will last for decades (or more). Also, if you think about it -
have a good sex life can also relieve stress, boredom and decrees to reduce
the divorce rate. Sounds like a win-win.
We can not have a drug without naming a disease. The solution was
to "identify" as a disorder. DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders) named in 2000 "gender dysphoria and gender" as HSDD
(hypoactive sexual desire disorder). This means that premature ejaculation,
paraphilia (fetishism), analloerotic (having no sexual interest in other
people) and lack of sexual desire are in that category.
Now that the "disorder" has been identified, the public was & # 8221
studied; who needs a low sex drive to be tracked and monitored.
I'm not in the mood. Try another day
Mala? fides
After a few years in the laboratory, it seems that there was a light at the
end of a tunnel. Boehringer Ingelheim, a German pharmaceutical company, was
able to synthesize a new antidepressant called flibanserin. The company
noted that some of the participants reported an increase in their sex
drive. Looks a revised Viagra story. The clinical trial was based on
pre-menopausal women - young women are not yet reproductively useless.
The trial divided the subjects into 2 groups randomly. Each day, each
subject was asked to rate their libido on a 4-point scale (0 - no desire,
intense desire 3). The trial found that there was no particular difference
between the groups.
Moreover, it seems that, taking flibanserin, there were side effects:
dizziness, drowsiness, and nausea. Based on these, the FDA rejected the new
drug based on the benefits of risk and failure to demonstrate a statistical
effect on sexual desire and entry criteria too restrictive for the two
Phase 3 trials . the message was received and Boehringer Ingelheim has
decided not to throw money at a time.
Throwing money after bad money is not a calculated step
Human garbage is gold with another man. A new pharmaceutical company called
Sprout Pharmaceuticals think they can win the gold. In fact, the looks of
it, the founders thought exactly that. They approached and Boehringer
Ingelheim bought the rights to flibanserin, after raising $ 20M. Sprout was
led by Cindy and Robert Whitehead who both had extensive experience in the
pharmaceutical industry.
Cindy and Robert Whitehead
They looked comments from the FDA decided to change tactics. Instead of a
daily report, it has become a ratio of 4 weeks (which means that the
subjects reported every week over the last four weeks). It smelled bad - we
all know that the longer you wait with subjective feelings reports (and
desire is totally subjective), more prone to error is. The company
resubmitted the drug to the FDA in 2013. The FDA rejected again based on
the same risk / benefit ratio.
What do you do when the government refuses to give you a license to print
money? You lobby and use the classic straw man - feminism. The advocacy
group created company called even the score D.C. and began using feminist
language to shame the establishment and call the FDA "macho". They went
after and MPs have to write letters to the FDA. They went to a campaign.
Here one of the ads:
The pressure worked, but it was noticed even by BuzzFeed, which we all know
is not a harsh critique of liberal / feminist policies. In 2015, the FDA
approved the drug for commercial use, even if nothing changed
fundamentally. You can read the pressure in the output:
The FDA has recognized for some time the challenges involved in the
development of treatments for female sexual dysfunction.
Since feminists love to beat the drum on equality, it is important to note
that there is no treatment for men:
Before approving Addyi, there was no treatment approved by the FDA for
disorders of sexual desire in men or women.
Downhill and fast
Immediately after the approval, Sprout Pharmaceuticals was acquired by
Valeant Pharmaceuticals for the modest sum of $ 1 billion. Valeant think,
but they had a lot going for them. However, as stated Murphy's
Law: "Whatever can go wrong will go wrong. "- as the" female Viagra ".
Valeant had a practice of buying drugs and then driving them up prices. It
was all good, until the government has noticed. It was in October 2015.
Worse, Valeant has doubled the price of Addyi to $ 800. Addyi also faces
the problem of distribution, Valeant has chosen a company called Philidor,
which went bankrupt shortly.
Yes. He was also quick
Sprout shareholders angered by Valeant practice, have contacted the
management of Valeant and demanded explanations. The height of it was
deposited in November last complaint is always set in court. Sales in 2016
were poor - about $ 10 million worldwide. Viagra comparison is not
flattering - it sold $ 788m in its first year on the market. Valeant is now
bleeding money, and its largest shareholder sold in March this year at a
reported loss of $ 2.8 billion.
Conclusion
Yes. I'm a billion dollars and all I had to do is to manipulate the
government
This is a story of greed and abuse of power. It shows how the state can be
easily handled using tactics of "macho" of humiliation. Furthermore, the
only people to come on top Sprout Pharmaceuticals shareholders are led by
founders who had completed and just changed their pockets. It was almost
a "hit and force" business plan. Everyone connected to the "pink Viagra"
paid a heavy price. It was also a clear case where feminism was nothing
more than a vessel for a lot of money. Who cares about health, when big
money is on the line?
From the point of view red pill, we know that a woman's sexual desire is a
fluid and fickle phenomenon. Everything can not be repaired by drugs and
chemicals. Life is more than measurable quantities. In any case, we all
expect to see if and when a "female Viagra" real will on the market - how
many women actually use. Women thwart nature hypergamious not communicate
that to have a satisfying sexual relationship with a beta.
Read more: The anti-feminism wisdom of the Bible
4 lessons of humanity first test Shit
Understanding shit tests is important. Really important. Not just to
navigate your relationships with women, but also for understanding,
defining and defending yourself.
Don t believe me? So why chronic God in the world's first poop test in
chapter 3 of Genesis, immediately after the small matter of the creation of
heaven and earth? here's how it is men agree ,, before any discussion, say,
the purpose of life, the nature of God, or the path of freedom, God sits
down and says, Listen & # 8220 & # 8221.
And yet we are eleventy bazillion years later having to relearn the lessons
of this primordial history of man versus woman. Rest assured, however. The
story is short and the lessons are lively.
The first test shit
Let's set the stage:
Now the serpent was more crafty than any wild animals the Lord God had
made. One day he asked the woman, "Did God really you should not eat the
fruit of one of the trees of the garden? "
"Of course we may eat fruit from the trees in the garden," the woman
replied. "It is only the fruit of the tree in the garden that we are not
allowed to eat. God said, 'You must not eat or even touch; if you do, you
will die. "
"You will not die! "The serpent said to the woman. "God knows that your
eyes will be opened as soon as you eat, and you will be like God, knowing
good and evil. "
The woman was convinced. She saw that the tree was beautiful and its fruit
looked delicious, and she wanted the wisdom it would give her. So she took
the fruit and ate. Then she gave to her husband, who was with her, and he
also ate. At that moment their eyes were opened, and they felt suddenly
ashamed of their nakedness. Genesis 3 NLT
So what is the test of shit? Simply this: If Adam to take the fruit to
please Eve and maintain her relationship with her? Or should it say, & #
8216; The farm. On foot snake talk and return to the tent. I want to be
successful with you & # 8217.
Lesson # 1 - this ISN T new shit
God's response to Eve shit disobedient test is quite instructive:
And you'll want to control your husband, and he shall rule over you & #
8221.
In other words, this tension, the conflict between men and women we deal
constantly going back to the beginning. The feminists of the first wave
didn t create. feminists of the second or third wave didn t create either.
All they're doing collectively come together to do what they can do
individually t & # 8211; control men.
Feminists argue that feminism is about equality. & # 8216; & # 8217
equality; is a lie. As ever was, their desire is that women rule over you.
Period.
Now, fast forward a few thousand - or million & # 8211; years. Because
women haven t changed, given the same warning:
& # 8230; you women must accept the authority of your husbands. For
example, Sarah obeyed her husband, Abraham, calling him lord. You are her
daughters when you do what is right without fear of what your husbands
might do & # 8221. 1 Peter 3
Now wouldn t be told women to present to men if they weren t able. It would
be just average. But even well-meaning women fear that their natural man
would do with its authority if it actually did submit to him. Letting go,
trusting another human being, is difficult. Humans suck most of the time. I
understood. And feminism is always there to stir up fear and mistrust.
The management of this age-old conflict compels us to recognize their fears
and demonstrate a solid, trustworthy - so unpredictable playfulness -
masculinity.
Lesson # 2 - Be active not passive
Adam is the punishment:
"Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree whose fruit I
commanded you not to eat, the ground is cursed because of you. All your
life you will struggle to survive it & # 8221.
Have you noticed this? The cause of Adam's transgression was that & # 8216;
listened to his wife and followed in disobedience. woman happy, happy life,
my ass!
He should have the closest grabbed a shovel and cut the snake's head before
admonishing his wife for his greed - this despite their lavish home!
Instead Adam sat passively where the scene unfolded.
The lesson is simple. To be active. To be engaged. And actually care of
your wife. Of course, many women calling you a bully and say you're too
much control. That's good. If you're in it a real relationship, neighbor.
This can be treated with the & # 8216; snakes of life itself.
You can t Fool me, sir!
Lesson # 3 - Women are gullible and greedy
Women have exquisite feminine virtues based on openness and responsiveness
than men rightly cherish when we can find it. Frankly, when you see it, it
is incredibly attractive and intoxicating. But there's another side to the
female virtue.
When you're open and receptive, you're also more easily fooled.
And it was not Adam who was deceived by Satan. The woman was deceived, and
sin was the result.
And when your nature is to attract and receive, you are also more inclined
to materialism and greed you are looking for validation in all the wrong
places.
She saw that the tree was beautiful & # 8230; .and she wanted & # 8230;
This is one reason - there are others & # 8211; that men should lead women
in relationships. It is not master them or for their own gain abusively.
It's to provide women with a safe space to express and share their feminine
nature with us without being taken advantage of.
Conversely, when women call the shots in a relationship, it is exhausting
nature and ultimately unsatisfactory for both. His greed and credulity
combine to dominate the purpose of the union. She will see and want and be
sold & # 8230;. a bigger house & # 8230; a larger diamond & # 8230;. a
newer car & # 8230; other holiday & # 8230 cheap; a fairy tale wedding. You
know the drill.
In the end, his greed and credulity become your own. And the things his
control will become your masters.
Who's the boss?
Lesson # 4 - Lead your wife, or ..
Let this game. It's a period of time when Eve took the fruit, but Adam hasn
t. At this point, Adam has two choices. It can track Eve - submit for & #
8211; or follow God. Ultimately, of course, he submits to Eve.
But why did he choose the day of God knowing that it was false? Because he
was afraid of losing his relationship with her he loved, a relationship
marked by the undisputed trust and sheer physical and emotional intimacy.
Sounds good right?
In the end though - and this is the lesson for us & # 8211; by selling its
own integrity and its appeal to the leadership, he ended up losing the same
relationship he wanted to protect. In its place, he received a new
relationship with Eve marked by mistrust, conflict and competition.
Similarly, when we abdicate leadership, when we sell our own integrity, we
first lose self-respect, and in turn, his respect. And then the
relationship ends, or worse, it empties into hell blue pill. It is simply
not acceptable alternative for men conducting relationships.
Conclusion
So there it is. Nothing new under the sun. Women are the same as have ever
been. And the tension between us is as old as humanity - baked in the heart
of every man and woman.
So what do we do? Well, what does Adam do? He got up after the test-shit
colossal failure to end all test failures shit and took the red pill.
The man Adam named his wife Eve, because she would be the mother of all
living.
In other words, it takes its authority back and advance the best he can,
perhaps having learned a bit along the way. Oh, and he takes Eve back to
the tent. And she follows.
Read more: The 4 major tests Shit Rocky Balboa Transmitted win Adrian
navigate your relationships with women, but also for understanding,
defining and defending yourself.
Don t believe me? So why chronic God in the world's first poop test in
chapter 3 of Genesis, immediately after the small matter of the creation of
heaven and earth? here's how it is men agree ,, before any discussion, say,
the purpose of life, the nature of God, or the path of freedom, God sits
down and says, Listen & # 8220 & # 8221.
And yet we are eleventy bazillion years later having to relearn the lessons
of this primordial history of man versus woman. Rest assured, however. The
story is short and the lessons are lively.
The first test shit
Let's set the stage:
Now the serpent was more crafty than any wild animals the Lord God had
made. One day he asked the woman, "Did God really you should not eat the
fruit of one of the trees of the garden? "
"Of course we may eat fruit from the trees in the garden," the woman
replied. "It is only the fruit of the tree in the garden that we are not
allowed to eat. God said, 'You must not eat or even touch; if you do, you
will die. "
"You will not die! "The serpent said to the woman. "God knows that your
eyes will be opened as soon as you eat, and you will be like God, knowing
good and evil. "
The woman was convinced. She saw that the tree was beautiful and its fruit
looked delicious, and she wanted the wisdom it would give her. So she took
the fruit and ate. Then she gave to her husband, who was with her, and he
also ate. At that moment their eyes were opened, and they felt suddenly
ashamed of their nakedness. Genesis 3 NLT
So what is the test of shit? Simply this: If Adam to take the fruit to
please Eve and maintain her relationship with her? Or should it say, & #
8216; The farm. On foot snake talk and return to the tent. I want to be
successful with you & # 8217.
Lesson # 1 - this ISN T new shit
God's response to Eve shit disobedient test is quite instructive:
And you'll want to control your husband, and he shall rule over you & #
8221.
In other words, this tension, the conflict between men and women we deal
constantly going back to the beginning. The feminists of the first wave
didn t create. feminists of the second or third wave didn t create either.
All they're doing collectively come together to do what they can do
individually t & # 8211; control men.
Feminists argue that feminism is about equality. & # 8216; & # 8217
equality; is a lie. As ever was, their desire is that women rule over you.
Period.
Now, fast forward a few thousand - or million & # 8211; years. Because
women haven t changed, given the same warning:
& # 8230; you women must accept the authority of your husbands. For
example, Sarah obeyed her husband, Abraham, calling him lord. You are her
daughters when you do what is right without fear of what your husbands
might do & # 8221. 1 Peter 3
Now wouldn t be told women to present to men if they weren t able. It would
be just average. But even well-meaning women fear that their natural man
would do with its authority if it actually did submit to him. Letting go,
trusting another human being, is difficult. Humans suck most of the time. I
understood. And feminism is always there to stir up fear and mistrust.
The management of this age-old conflict compels us to recognize their fears
and demonstrate a solid, trustworthy - so unpredictable playfulness -
masculinity.
Lesson # 2 - Be active not passive
Adam is the punishment:
"Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree whose fruit I
commanded you not to eat, the ground is cursed because of you. All your
life you will struggle to survive it & # 8221.
Have you noticed this? The cause of Adam's transgression was that & # 8216;
listened to his wife and followed in disobedience. woman happy, happy life,
my ass!
He should have the closest grabbed a shovel and cut the snake's head before
admonishing his wife for his greed - this despite their lavish home!
Instead Adam sat passively where the scene unfolded.
The lesson is simple. To be active. To be engaged. And actually care of
your wife. Of course, many women calling you a bully and say you're too
much control. That's good. If you're in it a real relationship, neighbor.
This can be treated with the & # 8216; snakes of life itself.
You can t Fool me, sir!
Lesson # 3 - Women are gullible and greedy
Women have exquisite feminine virtues based on openness and responsiveness
than men rightly cherish when we can find it. Frankly, when you see it, it
is incredibly attractive and intoxicating. But there's another side to the
female virtue.
When you're open and receptive, you're also more easily fooled.
And it was not Adam who was deceived by Satan. The woman was deceived, and
sin was the result.
And when your nature is to attract and receive, you are also more inclined
to materialism and greed you are looking for validation in all the wrong
places.
She saw that the tree was beautiful & # 8230; .and she wanted & # 8230;
This is one reason - there are others & # 8211; that men should lead women
in relationships. It is not master them or for their own gain abusively.
It's to provide women with a safe space to express and share their feminine
nature with us without being taken advantage of.
Conversely, when women call the shots in a relationship, it is exhausting
nature and ultimately unsatisfactory for both. His greed and credulity
combine to dominate the purpose of the union. She will see and want and be
sold & # 8230;. a bigger house & # 8230; a larger diamond & # 8230;. a
newer car & # 8230; other holiday & # 8230 cheap; a fairy tale wedding. You
know the drill.
In the end, his greed and credulity become your own. And the things his
control will become your masters.
Who's the boss?
Lesson # 4 - Lead your wife, or ..
Let this game. It's a period of time when Eve took the fruit, but Adam hasn
t. At this point, Adam has two choices. It can track Eve - submit for & #
8211; or follow God. Ultimately, of course, he submits to Eve.
But why did he choose the day of God knowing that it was false? Because he
was afraid of losing his relationship with her he loved, a relationship
marked by the undisputed trust and sheer physical and emotional intimacy.
Sounds good right?
In the end though - and this is the lesson for us & # 8211; by selling its
own integrity and its appeal to the leadership, he ended up losing the same
relationship he wanted to protect. In its place, he received a new
relationship with Eve marked by mistrust, conflict and competition.
Similarly, when we abdicate leadership, when we sell our own integrity, we
first lose self-respect, and in turn, his respect. And then the
relationship ends, or worse, it empties into hell blue pill. It is simply
not acceptable alternative for men conducting relationships.
Conclusion
So there it is. Nothing new under the sun. Women are the same as have ever
been. And the tension between us is as old as humanity - baked in the heart
of every man and woman.
So what do we do? Well, what does Adam do? He got up after the test-shit
colossal failure to end all test failures shit and took the red pill.
The man Adam named his wife Eve, because she would be the mother of all
living.
In other words, it takes its authority back and advance the best he can,
perhaps having learned a bit along the way. Oh, and he takes Eve back to
the tent. And she follows.
Read more: The 4 major tests Shit Rocky Balboa Transmitted win Adrian
Maybe men Men Without being warriors?
As our society is rotting in peace with materialism and hedonism that comes
with it, it is clear that the only way to bring real masculinity is to
return to our roots warrior. The men were for the battle for the domination
and conquest, and the fact that our modern society has relegated us as
useful drones make money is what's leading to the degradation of
masculinity. It is no wonder we are all lost in what our true purpose is in
this world.
Masculinity is the man the ability to be a warrior
Although there is much debate exactly what constitutes masculinity, I think
it is defined mainly by men capacity as tribal warriors like wolves are
defined by their ferocity and their propensity to hunt in packs. You can
not just be a man without being a warrior.
Now, some will disagree and say that you don t have to be a warrior to be a
masculine man. They will point to the men of achievement in the areas of
making money, creativity and philosophy. But we must not forget that being
talented and great doesn t necessarily make you men. They are different
qualities.
Others (especially the crowd of MGTOW) masculinity associated with
scientific breakthroughs and contribute to technological advancement,
bringing examples of Newton, Nietzsche, Tesla, and so on. While their minds
are admirable and profound genius is undeniable, can we really say that
these men were men?
To take a modern example, we all saw what happened to the scientist Matt
Taylor when he was targeted by feminists on a shirt he wore: he broke down
in tears. While men certainly more logical than women and most productive
minds, I do not walk too far and say that intelligence alone is a male.
male traits like warrior traits
seasoned soldiers of Syria Tiger Forces who's been the fight against the
jihadists for years. These men have won t be cucked soon.
Manhood is intrinsically linked to testosterone and testosterone is what
fuels us to assert our will against violent world. If you analyze all the
essential traits of masculinity, you will realize that all correspond to
traits that are necessary attributes and grown warriors fighting as one.
Those are:
Physical strength and skills needed for combat.
Endurance, resilience and strength of will.
Acts of bravery and determination against the danger.
stoic disposition and mental strength.
The discipline and austerity.
Violence and propensity for aggression.
The drive for dominance and power.
Focusing on a mission and purpose.
Intelligence and cunningness.
The honor and loyalty.
It is not surprising that many warrior traits are related to black Triad
traits that women find irresistible, which is why serial killers seem to
activate a deep sexual attraction in many women. As another recent example,
a woman who worked for the FBI flew to Syria to marry an ISIS fighter it
was investigating. I guess all the other smug, male agents in costume, she
worked with didn t raw and untamed masculinity distill an Islamist soldier.
But even without these extreme examples, the facts are clear: women love
and respect the violent men who have the warrior spirit. Just ask the wives
of the Vikings and Samurai if they ever thought of cheating on their
husbands or seek equality.
The Warriors are the backbone of a strong and healthy society
While many lament the disappearance of nationalism and traditional nuclear
families, I would say that the disintegration of the group of strong men is
by far the greatest calamity that leads to the decline of the society we
are seeing all around us . In fact, the hierarchy of men is the backbone of
a strong and stable social order that allows strong national identity and
the training of the patriarchal family to develop. You can not have
families and nuclear nationalism without first being men who are warriors.
Of course, the problem is that there is no need of a strong group of men
organized in today's consumerist society. Our "civilization" has
disintegrated male order in favor of an atomized population that is easier
to operate as economic units by elites. Masculinity becomes automatically
obsolete.
Being a warrior gives man a purpose
Unfortunately, I can not remember or find the log I m referring here this
for years, but most of the psychological study I read showed that young
European men in the army at the time enjoyed where they served them were
better suited, healthier and formed deep social ties between them. In fact,
they loved go through a routine, being told what to do, and have a purpose.
But once they were released and returned home, many began to become lazy,
unmotivated and even depressed to the point of not wanting to get out of
their beds.
While we use to divide Alpha-Beta (wrongly) the distinction between
masculine men and men are emasculated and supplication to women, we must
remember that Alpha Beta refers to the male hierarchy (the real antonym of
alpha males would omega men). In the primitive world, being a beta doesn t
mean you aren t as masculine, but you are subordinate to the alpha leader.
Beta males are capable warriors themselves and often challenge the alpha to
become the new leader.
Knowing this, one has to wonder how many betas & # 8212; cucks of
effeminate young frustrated full of angst & # 8212; are only men who never
had a chance to be led by a strong male leader. When we don t live in a
warrior society, when we don t have a fraternity belong, we become lost and
aimless as European men just out of the army.
Men aspire to be warriors
I have a new friend who told me how much he loves the TV series, the
Vikings. On a whim, I asked him if he wanted he could live like a Viking.
His face brightened and he responded with a resounding & # 8221 Yeah !; And
this is a young man shy and awkward that grew under a domineering sister
and fatherless, a classic & # 8221 beta; working just out and spends his
free time watching anime. But still, hidden in his heart was his desire to
be a warrior.
All men seek to become warriors, whether they know it or not. They are
powered by the same testosterone that makes sexual desire. We know that
boys reach puberty want sex without ever having experienced it before as it
is one of our primary basic disk. The same is true for men and their desire
to be warriors & # 8212; it is something that is imprinted in our genes.
Why else do you think that men like aggressive sports and video games? Why
men would like to watch other tribalism and violence through movies and TV
shows like The Expendables and The Walking Dead? What other motive would
drive men to train in MMA, shoot guns, and joining a gang or the army?
We all aspire to be warriors and we all enjoy the adventure, brotherhood
and excitement that comes with it. The problem is that what we have today
are alternative activities that we no longer live in a warrior society.
Surrogate activities and compensation
An example of a modern warrior: Level 90 Night Elf
As our society discourages and defending our basic instincts, it's not
surprising to see hordes of men dedicated to male activities substituted
offset the inability to make their lives as warriors. And these drives are
often exploited by governments and businesses for their own profit.
Masculinity has become commercialized.
Think about it: what are the competitive sports if alternative activities
that simulate the war? The most popular sports are where two opposition
groups of men, the modern day gladiators, fighting for the win in a
battlefield controlled. They exist for the sole purpose of keeping the
men's testosterone in check by providing an outlet to vent their masculine
energy while enjoying it.
The same can be said of other forms of entertainment. It is no accident
that men like TV shows and movies that depict violence, survival and power
struggle. And the most popular video games for men's and RPG shooting in
the first person the player is a warrior on an adventure or a soldier in
the war.
The clearing activities also extends to other areas such as weight
training, make money, women collection, internet tribalism and political
struggles. They use all the fragments of our warrior traits to meet part of
our male needs. But they are never complete because they don t meet our
basic identity that is buried deep within us. compensatory activities can
not bring us contentment.
We must open our eyes and realize that all the hyped-up, macho
entertainment only exists to keep us doused. No matter how many men & #
8221; and movies "red pill" that you look, they do not make you a man for
the same reason watching a marathon of martial arts films will not turn you
into a master Kung Fu.
Men intellectualism another surrogate activity
Reading men who fight and conquer won t make you a fighter and a Conqueror.
Drop the damn book and create your own legacy.
There are not so long that I wanted to read classical works such as the
Iliad, the Count of Monte Cristo, Fight Club, and the philosophical works
of Seneca, Nietzsche and Evola & # 8212; not to mention countless history
books that tell the men achievements. But now I wonder: what for? What will
they add to all the works I've read? For example, I'm reading a book
manosphere circle that is highly rated, but I find too trivial to continue.
I thought reading books, especially the timeless volumes of our ancestors,
was a worthy task to cultivate our masculinity. And it is up to a point.
The problem engaging in books is that it does not take long before it
becomes just another substitute activity that traps your ego up in the
ivory tower. It becomes an exercise in mental masturbation to satisfy his
own deepest desires: a way to escape the modern degeneration so that we can
take refuge in the words and thoughts instead of fighting the real world in
the flesh and the blood. It is just another way to compensate for our
inability and unwillingness to move the world around us.
No book will ever compensate for the lack of experience in real life. The
brutal truth is that even if we spend our entire lives to read thousands of
books on masculinity and the lives of great men of history, none of this
will actually make us a masculine man, much less change society and
culture. It is safe to say that a month of fighting in a brutal war harden
a man in masculinity over decades of reading & # 8221 virile; books.
We must admit that we read and write on the theme of masculinity as a
compensatory activity because our society forbids us to exercise our
warrior spirit. I am sure that without the lifetime of social conditioning
that has made us passive and weak, most men would jump at the chance to
live a life of a warrior instead of just reading and writing about it, like
how any healthy man would prefer watching porn on real sex. And that's
exactly what & # 8221 male; literatures are: porn for men who crave a male
existence.
We were stripped of our lifestyle
It hurts me that I don t grow up in a warrior culture as these boys.
There is much talk about how men today are transformed into low-beta and T
cucks, but why should they be different? What motivates them to keep their
strong masculinity? Western men today live in infinitely peaceful
conditions and live in a culture that values safety bravery. And since
the company did not need warriors (except for professionals who will fight
like dogs for the elites), they have absolutely no interest in being
masculine, except when the time to pretend to be difficult for I validation.
For now the technology addicted, materialistic, and progressive men,
maintaining masculinity is as always wear a coat when it's summer. They are
useless for masculinity and they do not want to make the effort to
cultivate. Women, in turn, have no reason to respect the men and women
behave, which is why our society is increasingly androgynized every day.
What about men who still enjoy their masculinity? What are the major
options we have? There is almost no. We were stripped of our lives that
we've been trained from childhood to serve a matriarchal system with
tolerance and equality & # 8221; as our religion. The company doesn t want
us to be men; we want to become mere cogs in his machines. He wants us to
be stuck in some soul-sucking jobs and empty of meaning.
I personally deplore the fact that I got to experience being a warrior in
my youth. And what other significant activity should I pursue in my short
life? I'm not interested in writing incessantly to vent my repressed men's
discus; I'm not interested in making money or pursue "success to compensate
castration; I don t want to develop skills blabbering to attract women; I
don t want to continue to piss my life away on the Internet; and I
certainly won t waste more of my time with activities and books.
My only real chance of being a warrior is to join the armed forces of a
country that I have no love for (Canada) just to be sent to fight the
people I have nothing against. And it's about the choice of all the men of
the West: your exit only to be a true warrior is to be a pawn of the state,
risking your life in the war in favor of the globalists.
Conclusion
So to answer the question: Can men be men without warriors? The answer is
yes and no. I guess if you engage in only alternative development right
form aggressively as a fighter, and put you through many life experiences
that challenge your mind and your body, you can simulate to be a warrior
and develop masculine traits listed above. But ultimately, it will not be
true and men as a whole (average) continue to be stripped of their
masculinity.
Warrior is the only way for a human being and all our social problems
associated with masculinity can be attributed to the decline of the warrior
culture. Everything and everyone talks to defeat feminism and the
restoration of the masculine order is useless until we are ready to become
warriors.
Read more: 10 Male Virtues that went to the grave with our grandfathers
with it, it is clear that the only way to bring real masculinity is to
return to our roots warrior. The men were for the battle for the domination
and conquest, and the fact that our modern society has relegated us as
useful drones make money is what's leading to the degradation of
masculinity. It is no wonder we are all lost in what our true purpose is in
this world.
Masculinity is the man the ability to be a warrior
Although there is much debate exactly what constitutes masculinity, I think
it is defined mainly by men capacity as tribal warriors like wolves are
defined by their ferocity and their propensity to hunt in packs. You can
not just be a man without being a warrior.
Now, some will disagree and say that you don t have to be a warrior to be a
masculine man. They will point to the men of achievement in the areas of
making money, creativity and philosophy. But we must not forget that being
talented and great doesn t necessarily make you men. They are different
qualities.
Others (especially the crowd of MGTOW) masculinity associated with
scientific breakthroughs and contribute to technological advancement,
bringing examples of Newton, Nietzsche, Tesla, and so on. While their minds
are admirable and profound genius is undeniable, can we really say that
these men were men?
To take a modern example, we all saw what happened to the scientist Matt
Taylor when he was targeted by feminists on a shirt he wore: he broke down
in tears. While men certainly more logical than women and most productive
minds, I do not walk too far and say that intelligence alone is a male.
male traits like warrior traits
seasoned soldiers of Syria Tiger Forces who's been the fight against the
jihadists for years. These men have won t be cucked soon.
Manhood is intrinsically linked to testosterone and testosterone is what
fuels us to assert our will against violent world. If you analyze all the
essential traits of masculinity, you will realize that all correspond to
traits that are necessary attributes and grown warriors fighting as one.
Those are:
Physical strength and skills needed for combat.
Endurance, resilience and strength of will.
Acts of bravery and determination against the danger.
stoic disposition and mental strength.
The discipline and austerity.
Violence and propensity for aggression.
The drive for dominance and power.
Focusing on a mission and purpose.
Intelligence and cunningness.
The honor and loyalty.
It is not surprising that many warrior traits are related to black Triad
traits that women find irresistible, which is why serial killers seem to
activate a deep sexual attraction in many women. As another recent example,
a woman who worked for the FBI flew to Syria to marry an ISIS fighter it
was investigating. I guess all the other smug, male agents in costume, she
worked with didn t raw and untamed masculinity distill an Islamist soldier.
But even without these extreme examples, the facts are clear: women love
and respect the violent men who have the warrior spirit. Just ask the wives
of the Vikings and Samurai if they ever thought of cheating on their
husbands or seek equality.
The Warriors are the backbone of a strong and healthy society
While many lament the disappearance of nationalism and traditional nuclear
families, I would say that the disintegration of the group of strong men is
by far the greatest calamity that leads to the decline of the society we
are seeing all around us . In fact, the hierarchy of men is the backbone of
a strong and stable social order that allows strong national identity and
the training of the patriarchal family to develop. You can not have
families and nuclear nationalism without first being men who are warriors.
Of course, the problem is that there is no need of a strong group of men
organized in today's consumerist society. Our "civilization" has
disintegrated male order in favor of an atomized population that is easier
to operate as economic units by elites. Masculinity becomes automatically
obsolete.
Being a warrior gives man a purpose
Unfortunately, I can not remember or find the log I m referring here this
for years, but most of the psychological study I read showed that young
European men in the army at the time enjoyed where they served them were
better suited, healthier and formed deep social ties between them. In fact,
they loved go through a routine, being told what to do, and have a purpose.
But once they were released and returned home, many began to become lazy,
unmotivated and even depressed to the point of not wanting to get out of
their beds.
While we use to divide Alpha-Beta (wrongly) the distinction between
masculine men and men are emasculated and supplication to women, we must
remember that Alpha Beta refers to the male hierarchy (the real antonym of
alpha males would omega men). In the primitive world, being a beta doesn t
mean you aren t as masculine, but you are subordinate to the alpha leader.
Beta males are capable warriors themselves and often challenge the alpha to
become the new leader.
Knowing this, one has to wonder how many betas & # 8212; cucks of
effeminate young frustrated full of angst & # 8212; are only men who never
had a chance to be led by a strong male leader. When we don t live in a
warrior society, when we don t have a fraternity belong, we become lost and
aimless as European men just out of the army.
Men aspire to be warriors
I have a new friend who told me how much he loves the TV series, the
Vikings. On a whim, I asked him if he wanted he could live like a Viking.
His face brightened and he responded with a resounding & # 8221 Yeah !; And
this is a young man shy and awkward that grew under a domineering sister
and fatherless, a classic & # 8221 beta; working just out and spends his
free time watching anime. But still, hidden in his heart was his desire to
be a warrior.
All men seek to become warriors, whether they know it or not. They are
powered by the same testosterone that makes sexual desire. We know that
boys reach puberty want sex without ever having experienced it before as it
is one of our primary basic disk. The same is true for men and their desire
to be warriors & # 8212; it is something that is imprinted in our genes.
Why else do you think that men like aggressive sports and video games? Why
men would like to watch other tribalism and violence through movies and TV
shows like The Expendables and The Walking Dead? What other motive would
drive men to train in MMA, shoot guns, and joining a gang or the army?
We all aspire to be warriors and we all enjoy the adventure, brotherhood
and excitement that comes with it. The problem is that what we have today
are alternative activities that we no longer live in a warrior society.
Surrogate activities and compensation
An example of a modern warrior: Level 90 Night Elf
As our society discourages and defending our basic instincts, it's not
surprising to see hordes of men dedicated to male activities substituted
offset the inability to make their lives as warriors. And these drives are
often exploited by governments and businesses for their own profit.
Masculinity has become commercialized.
Think about it: what are the competitive sports if alternative activities
that simulate the war? The most popular sports are where two opposition
groups of men, the modern day gladiators, fighting for the win in a
battlefield controlled. They exist for the sole purpose of keeping the
men's testosterone in check by providing an outlet to vent their masculine
energy while enjoying it.
The same can be said of other forms of entertainment. It is no accident
that men like TV shows and movies that depict violence, survival and power
struggle. And the most popular video games for men's and RPG shooting in
the first person the player is a warrior on an adventure or a soldier in
the war.
The clearing activities also extends to other areas such as weight
training, make money, women collection, internet tribalism and political
struggles. They use all the fragments of our warrior traits to meet part of
our male needs. But they are never complete because they don t meet our
basic identity that is buried deep within us. compensatory activities can
not bring us contentment.
We must open our eyes and realize that all the hyped-up, macho
entertainment only exists to keep us doused. No matter how many men & #
8221; and movies "red pill" that you look, they do not make you a man for
the same reason watching a marathon of martial arts films will not turn you
into a master Kung Fu.
Men intellectualism another surrogate activity
Reading men who fight and conquer won t make you a fighter and a Conqueror.
Drop the damn book and create your own legacy.
There are not so long that I wanted to read classical works such as the
Iliad, the Count of Monte Cristo, Fight Club, and the philosophical works
of Seneca, Nietzsche and Evola & # 8212; not to mention countless history
books that tell the men achievements. But now I wonder: what for? What will
they add to all the works I've read? For example, I'm reading a book
manosphere circle that is highly rated, but I find too trivial to continue.
I thought reading books, especially the timeless volumes of our ancestors,
was a worthy task to cultivate our masculinity. And it is up to a point.
The problem engaging in books is that it does not take long before it
becomes just another substitute activity that traps your ego up in the
ivory tower. It becomes an exercise in mental masturbation to satisfy his
own deepest desires: a way to escape the modern degeneration so that we can
take refuge in the words and thoughts instead of fighting the real world in
the flesh and the blood. It is just another way to compensate for our
inability and unwillingness to move the world around us.
No book will ever compensate for the lack of experience in real life. The
brutal truth is that even if we spend our entire lives to read thousands of
books on masculinity and the lives of great men of history, none of this
will actually make us a masculine man, much less change society and
culture. It is safe to say that a month of fighting in a brutal war harden
a man in masculinity over decades of reading & # 8221 virile; books.
We must admit that we read and write on the theme of masculinity as a
compensatory activity because our society forbids us to exercise our
warrior spirit. I am sure that without the lifetime of social conditioning
that has made us passive and weak, most men would jump at the chance to
live a life of a warrior instead of just reading and writing about it, like
how any healthy man would prefer watching porn on real sex. And that's
exactly what & # 8221 male; literatures are: porn for men who crave a male
existence.
We were stripped of our lifestyle
It hurts me that I don t grow up in a warrior culture as these boys.
There is much talk about how men today are transformed into low-beta and T
cucks, but why should they be different? What motivates them to keep their
strong masculinity? Western men today live in infinitely peaceful
conditions and live in a culture that values safety bravery. And since
the company did not need warriors (except for professionals who will fight
like dogs for the elites), they have absolutely no interest in being
masculine, except when the time to pretend to be difficult for I validation.
For now the technology addicted, materialistic, and progressive men,
maintaining masculinity is as always wear a coat when it's summer. They are
useless for masculinity and they do not want to make the effort to
cultivate. Women, in turn, have no reason to respect the men and women
behave, which is why our society is increasingly androgynized every day.
What about men who still enjoy their masculinity? What are the major
options we have? There is almost no. We were stripped of our lives that
we've been trained from childhood to serve a matriarchal system with
tolerance and equality & # 8221; as our religion. The company doesn t want
us to be men; we want to become mere cogs in his machines. He wants us to
be stuck in some soul-sucking jobs and empty of meaning.
I personally deplore the fact that I got to experience being a warrior in
my youth. And what other significant activity should I pursue in my short
life? I'm not interested in writing incessantly to vent my repressed men's
discus; I'm not interested in making money or pursue "success to compensate
castration; I don t want to develop skills blabbering to attract women; I
don t want to continue to piss my life away on the Internet; and I
certainly won t waste more of my time with activities and books.
My only real chance of being a warrior is to join the armed forces of a
country that I have no love for (Canada) just to be sent to fight the
people I have nothing against. And it's about the choice of all the men of
the West: your exit only to be a true warrior is to be a pawn of the state,
risking your life in the war in favor of the globalists.
Conclusion
So to answer the question: Can men be men without warriors? The answer is
yes and no. I guess if you engage in only alternative development right
form aggressively as a fighter, and put you through many life experiences
that challenge your mind and your body, you can simulate to be a warrior
and develop masculine traits listed above. But ultimately, it will not be
true and men as a whole (average) continue to be stripped of their
masculinity.
Warrior is the only way for a human being and all our social problems
associated with masculinity can be attributed to the decline of the warrior
culture. Everything and everyone talks to defeat feminism and the
restoration of the masculine order is useless until we are ready to become
warriors.
Read more: 10 Male Virtues that went to the grave with our grandfathers
Sunday, July 30, 2017
How to View Body Language Men
In this article past, I discussed how to present a strong, masculine face.
Which means, I have learned to manipulate your head's body language in
order to make you look strong, masculine, and confident.
While the head (especially the eyes) are the & # 8221 legible; part of your
body, it is obviously much more body to deal with, and that is what this
article will discuss.
The first question that we will treat with respect the body is, of course,
posture!
Posture
Posture affects and shows the attitude you convey. Remember that body
language is the sum of the parts of the body. Think like this: the face
shows the mood and the body shows the intensity of mood. Trust begins on
the face and spreads through the body
As with the face and head, you want to be tight, upright and symmetrical.
However, the language of the dominant male and bodies regarding the torso
and limbs adds a new dimension, that of taking up space.
To put it very simply (and thus make it easy to understand and implement in
your daily life), high status and confidence is reflected in a wide open
position. And conversely, the low status makes people shrink by showing the
posture that is closed and prospective.
As you can see in the images below, which uses the posture hunched
shoulders, drooping head and chest inward shows the weakness and lack of
commitment.
As the image states, these images show the man being nervous and unconfident
Even without seeing their heads, you can say that these people are standing
and proud
Throwing your weight around
In the literal, not metaphorical sense.
Place the weight evenly between the legs, standing firm and upright, shows
the strength, confidence, and all masculine traits you want to convey.
Hold your head up, chest open, and stomach and tight. The feet and legs
should work in harmony with the torso, arms and head to convey a certain
image. If you want to be seen as powerful, you must be firm with your legs
shoulder width apart and your chest puffed out.
Yours truly. Note the high chest and legs shoulder width
And don t think that these rules apply as if you're standing. When you sit
down, the strong and confident man legs retain their shoulder length
position, and the body is slightly leaning back and arms are relaxed and
neutral: not open, not closed.
Although I hate to use the cliché animal metaphors as you often see on the
men aki websites (be like a wolf, Brah), it is here: Imagine a lion does he
lean forward and become scarce? No, he reclines and extends, in space and
by showing that s dominant.
Room To Breathe
A good rule of thumb to remember for the posture of the solid body (ie, the
only thing you have to remember) is to present your testicles & # 8212; and
yes, I m being serious. Another way to put this rule of thumb is to ask,
what my testicles breathing & # 8221 ?; If you think your songs are crushed
together and are uncomfortable, you're not taking enough space.
Like this, except that I advise you to not do naked or with this particular
facial expression
So beyond the rule that most men instinctively know, what can be done with
the other body?
Arms
Seeing that the ball rule covers the legs and posture deals with the torso,
the arms are all that remain. Fortunately, this is probably the easiest to
treat: get open too wide makes you open and welcoming, which have narrow
shoulders and arms before clutching groin makes you look weak.
The key is the neutrality of the arm, or the time to arm lap times if you
want to convey authority. Also keep in mind that the palms down shows the
authority (the buck stops here sort of thing), so if you want gesturing to
make a point, your palms facing down. Keep in mind that the crossing arms,
by definition, palms down to.
All information above deals with the entire body for most, and can be
instantly used to present the upper body language.
There are many other moods and attitudes that can be expressed through body
language, but a cold, male dominance is the gold standard of body language,
so why would you learn anything from else bother? Your body will naturally
form other necessary emotions, so just try to keep dominant body language
as much as possible, and you will notice your life will greatly improve.
Read more: How to present a strong face and Men
Which means, I have learned to manipulate your head's body language in
order to make you look strong, masculine, and confident.
While the head (especially the eyes) are the & # 8221 legible; part of your
body, it is obviously much more body to deal with, and that is what this
article will discuss.
The first question that we will treat with respect the body is, of course,
posture!
Posture
Posture affects and shows the attitude you convey. Remember that body
language is the sum of the parts of the body. Think like this: the face
shows the mood and the body shows the intensity of mood. Trust begins on
the face and spreads through the body
As with the face and head, you want to be tight, upright and symmetrical.
However, the language of the dominant male and bodies regarding the torso
and limbs adds a new dimension, that of taking up space.
To put it very simply (and thus make it easy to understand and implement in
your daily life), high status and confidence is reflected in a wide open
position. And conversely, the low status makes people shrink by showing the
posture that is closed and prospective.
As you can see in the images below, which uses the posture hunched
shoulders, drooping head and chest inward shows the weakness and lack of
commitment.
As the image states, these images show the man being nervous and unconfident
Even without seeing their heads, you can say that these people are standing
and proud
Throwing your weight around
In the literal, not metaphorical sense.
Place the weight evenly between the legs, standing firm and upright, shows
the strength, confidence, and all masculine traits you want to convey.
Hold your head up, chest open, and stomach and tight. The feet and legs
should work in harmony with the torso, arms and head to convey a certain
image. If you want to be seen as powerful, you must be firm with your legs
shoulder width apart and your chest puffed out.
Yours truly. Note the high chest and legs shoulder width
And don t think that these rules apply as if you're standing. When you sit
down, the strong and confident man legs retain their shoulder length
position, and the body is slightly leaning back and arms are relaxed and
neutral: not open, not closed.
Although I hate to use the cliché animal metaphors as you often see on the
men aki websites (be like a wolf, Brah), it is here: Imagine a lion does he
lean forward and become scarce? No, he reclines and extends, in space and
by showing that s dominant.
Room To Breathe
A good rule of thumb to remember for the posture of the solid body (ie, the
only thing you have to remember) is to present your testicles & # 8212; and
yes, I m being serious. Another way to put this rule of thumb is to ask,
what my testicles breathing & # 8221 ?; If you think your songs are crushed
together and are uncomfortable, you're not taking enough space.
Like this, except that I advise you to not do naked or with this particular
facial expression
So beyond the rule that most men instinctively know, what can be done with
the other body?
Arms
Seeing that the ball rule covers the legs and posture deals with the torso,
the arms are all that remain. Fortunately, this is probably the easiest to
treat: get open too wide makes you open and welcoming, which have narrow
shoulders and arms before clutching groin makes you look weak.
The key is the neutrality of the arm, or the time to arm lap times if you
want to convey authority. Also keep in mind that the palms down shows the
authority (the buck stops here sort of thing), so if you want gesturing to
make a point, your palms facing down. Keep in mind that the crossing arms,
by definition, palms down to.
All information above deals with the entire body for most, and can be
instantly used to present the upper body language.
There are many other moods and attitudes that can be expressed through body
language, but a cold, male dominance is the gold standard of body language,
so why would you learn anything from else bother? Your body will naturally
form other necessary emotions, so just try to keep dominant body language
as much as possible, and you will notice your life will greatly improve.
Read more: How to present a strong face and Men
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)