Directed by Mel Gibson, Hacksaw Ridge is an intense biographical war film
authentically representing the combat action pacifist Desmond Doss WWII
Medic, the first man to be awarded the Medal of Honor without firing a
single shot.
There are no bars held to capture the true terrors of war, the
grotesqueness of foul decaying body and soul numbness entropy of sudden
death and horrific injuries by industrialized weapons.
However, even more valuable than the reality of war and military action are
the true ideals, virtuous and faithful adherence reasoned presented to them
in the life of Doss.
On the incident of traumatic childhood and faithfully religious background,
he refuses to take another life. Traditional relationships, honest middle
1900s both in wartime and in peacetime strike the consciousness of the
viewer into a world of deception and disloyalty.
brilliant action, highly precise cinematography, a powerful score, and deep
philosophical themes are Hacksaw Ridge stand out like a breath of fresh air
among the waves, tasteless and illogical liberal Hollywood movies (Avengers
series, Suicide Squad, The Secret Life of Animals, etc.).
The game Desmond
Against all odds, Hacksaw Ridge offers a pleasant invigoratingly
demonstration classic American play. After helping to save the life of a
man wounded in the basic medical knowledge and transportation to the
hospital, he looks around waiting, contemplating an attractive nurse.
As the camera focused on it, the tell the classic movie love at first
sight, I was eager to see what the protagonist in real life would do in the
bustle of the hospital.
He walks up and starts a conversation. Absolutely no hesitation. Although
the nurse explained that she was to giving blood, Doss practiced the rule
of the game literally say anything, with the opener being that the blood on
his shirt was not his.
After a brief speech, he donated his blood and went on its merry way. The
next day cornily dressed in his best, he says a confession of love that
gushy neomasculinity shake his head.
One might expect a beta version of its cheesy Southern background seemingly
innocuous and awkward smile, but then it goes straight to the end of time:
the movie date. She eagerly accepts, graciously reward for his courage and
immediate charming innocence.
Immediately after the date, the time inducing the most striking and
feminist rage, he kisses her without her permission. And it was not a small
peck; he was seconds until broken. Shocked, she slapped and punished.
"You did not ask! "
"I thought you liked. "
"Well, I might have if you asked! "
Conquered by his audacity and charisma, she easily meets the following
proposal of marriage but with unease. Doss application directly after
telling her he had enlisted.
Training
Similar to the hilarious scene shouting and giving full name Metal Jacket,
Hacksaw Ridge gives insolently comic tribute with its own sergeant s
introduction.
Later, however, the mood as the pacifist trend deepens Desmond not to kill
causes serious dissension in the ranks. All his officials are doing
everything that can throw the conscientious objector misplaced outside
their army.
Even after he was brutally hazed after an incredibly unfair treatment and
accused of being a sanctimonious coward, he still believes firmly and truly
in his duty to save the life in his country's war. After an exhausting
resistance, it is finally legally accepted as a combat medic.
"Private Doss, you are free to run under the fire of hell to battle without
a single weapon to protect yourself. "
War
Against all odds, he finally climbs the hills to arrive on the battlefield
with the rest of his team, and it is there that his actions demonstrate
true courage and faith. As grenade blast men apart, bullets shattered the
flesh and roast living in flamethrowers stunning graphics, it is one of
three doctors working frantically and decisively to save lives from brutal
war trenches.
Overflow by the Japanese, when a retreat is ordered before a friendly naval
artillery strike, Doss carries his wounded friend to realize that he is
dead. At this crucial moment, he is helpless and confused to the will of
his God. Then he hears the cries of the dying, crying out for someone to
save them, a divine sign. Doss rushed into hell, demonstrating heroism amid
heroes.
Hacksaw Ridge demonstrates the epitome of masculinity in all its aspects:
love, war, violence, death, family, fellowship, leadership and courage of
the individual.
Read more: A politically incorrect film that provides a front row seat to a
Futile War
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
What the Western world would look like if women were not granted the right to vote
The following article has been sponsored by Pax Masculina.
South Korean fans, tired companions of each new film with a feminist theme?
Want to see a video universe in which men create a paradise on earth with
their wise rule, and the insolent women in trouble are given their just
reward? My short film (18 minutes) is called Pax Masculina (Latin for peace
of men) and is an alternative science fiction film history.
It all started when I asked the question What is the United States like
today if women had never received the right to vote & # 8221 ?; The trailer
for two minutes below. I think you'll love the PAX universe.
In Pax Masculina, a theocratic totalitarian regime takes the United States
in 1910. Under this government, women have few rights as in the Old
Testament or culture Victorian England. Suffragettes were defeated and
women are never the vote.
For uninhibited women's influence, the following is a century of peace and
prosperity, known as Pax Masculina. On dissatisfied evolved suffragettes
women s Resistance Movement (WRM), which violently opposed to the plan. The
film is set in 2016 when the WRM increased aggression in its opposition to
patriarchy governing in their struggle for gender equality.
Resistance Movement of Women used bomb attacks and assassinations to create
terror and kill without mercy. Seduction and murder of policemen and
government officials are common tactics. The government induces its own
terror with the televised torture and execution of the captured soldiers
women. The Facebook movie website gives more details and many photos behind
the scenes of the film.
The pictures below represent the philosophy of the regime:
The conflict between the regime and WRM is really a battle for the hearts
and minds of young women who could join the WRM. When a girl turns 16, she
is eligible to marry. Husbands pay the father a dowry and there is a
transfer of ownership. There is a high school girls where teachers use
harsh rule and paddle freely to discipline unruly women.
Girls are forced to watch public hangings captured soldiers WRM on
televisions in class. In the scene pictured below, a daughter joking about
the threat hanging next to a victim, she just had to look.
A symbol on the wall of all classes to remind them of the consequences of
having a bad attitude. Gentlemen, how many times have you wanted to tell a
woman to lose the attitude & # 8221;? In this universe, it is the official
policy!
Beautiful women WRM wear uniforms inspired steampunk designed for combat
and seduction they engage in a fight melee with police. Authorities have
better weapons, but are reluctant to use them because they want to capture
those arrogant women living for public display.
WRM captured soldiers are publicly hanged with a television show in the
world of the event as if it were the World Cup or Super Bowl. No drop and a
large diameter rope is used to transport them into the air so they slowly
suffocate, which prevents permanent damage to the neck or trachea. There is
a good possibility that they will be half hanged (let down before death) to
be a sex slave to a worthy man. This discourages young women from joining
the WRM while entertaining the public.
Regarding the state of the film, the cut is completed and submitted to film
festivals. To stay up to date on its release, follow the Facebook page. The
first global Pax Masculina will Comicpalooza in Houston 12 to May 14 The
exact screening date and time will be posted on the Facebook page mentioned
above.
I made this film to express my views and share my artistic vision, not to
make money. Finally, it will just posted on YouTube or Vimeo be seen free
of charge. But for now, the festival rules prevent that qualify. My goal is
to make a feature film full length that extends the story line of the PAX
universe. But it's a year or two. Now I just want to share the vision with
people sharing the same ideas as the South Korean players. I hope the
trailer whets your appetite Andi would like to hear the comments. My best
guess for the release of the short film for public viewing is six months.
I admire Roosh more I can say, having been similarly harassed by warriors
of social justice against me. Perhaps he will agree to be a consultant on
the feature film? I made this film with a balanced perspective instead of
the manifesto of the empowerment of women waited. But the mere hint that
the government that excludes women could succeed led to an effort to
silence my creative voice.
Instead of reasoned debate, some think I should t be allowed to express my
artistic opinion. In addition, I have openly promoted men's rights movement
(displayed links to South Korean products, for example), and I dare say
positive things about President Trump. I'm vilified and decimated my
reputation with lies.
Having practiced engineering for over 40 years, I'm used to face the truth
and facts. I learned that the arts community is in general close to spirit
and truth means nothing to them. I am amazed at their ability to lie
without hesitation, without guilt, without apology. Some artists & # 8221;
show total lack of character and honor. Any departure politically correct
report is not tolerated. This will be the subject of a future post. For
now, I plan to continue to make films that tell the truth and have a
different perspective.
For more information on the film and follow his journey to the end, visit
Pax Masculina.
Advertise your product or site on the return of kings
South Korean fans, tired companions of each new film with a feminist theme?
Want to see a video universe in which men create a paradise on earth with
their wise rule, and the insolent women in trouble are given their just
reward? My short film (18 minutes) is called Pax Masculina (Latin for peace
of men) and is an alternative science fiction film history.
It all started when I asked the question What is the United States like
today if women had never received the right to vote & # 8221 ?; The trailer
for two minutes below. I think you'll love the PAX universe.
In Pax Masculina, a theocratic totalitarian regime takes the United States
in 1910. Under this government, women have few rights as in the Old
Testament or culture Victorian England. Suffragettes were defeated and
women are never the vote.
For uninhibited women's influence, the following is a century of peace and
prosperity, known as Pax Masculina. On dissatisfied evolved suffragettes
women s Resistance Movement (WRM), which violently opposed to the plan. The
film is set in 2016 when the WRM increased aggression in its opposition to
patriarchy governing in their struggle for gender equality.
Resistance Movement of Women used bomb attacks and assassinations to create
terror and kill without mercy. Seduction and murder of policemen and
government officials are common tactics. The government induces its own
terror with the televised torture and execution of the captured soldiers
women. The Facebook movie website gives more details and many photos behind
the scenes of the film.
The pictures below represent the philosophy of the regime:
The conflict between the regime and WRM is really a battle for the hearts
and minds of young women who could join the WRM. When a girl turns 16, she
is eligible to marry. Husbands pay the father a dowry and there is a
transfer of ownership. There is a high school girls where teachers use
harsh rule and paddle freely to discipline unruly women.
Girls are forced to watch public hangings captured soldiers WRM on
televisions in class. In the scene pictured below, a daughter joking about
the threat hanging next to a victim, she just had to look.
A symbol on the wall of all classes to remind them of the consequences of
having a bad attitude. Gentlemen, how many times have you wanted to tell a
woman to lose the attitude & # 8221;? In this universe, it is the official
policy!
Beautiful women WRM wear uniforms inspired steampunk designed for combat
and seduction they engage in a fight melee with police. Authorities have
better weapons, but are reluctant to use them because they want to capture
those arrogant women living for public display.
WRM captured soldiers are publicly hanged with a television show in the
world of the event as if it were the World Cup or Super Bowl. No drop and a
large diameter rope is used to transport them into the air so they slowly
suffocate, which prevents permanent damage to the neck or trachea. There is
a good possibility that they will be half hanged (let down before death) to
be a sex slave to a worthy man. This discourages young women from joining
the WRM while entertaining the public.
Regarding the state of the film, the cut is completed and submitted to film
festivals. To stay up to date on its release, follow the Facebook page. The
first global Pax Masculina will Comicpalooza in Houston 12 to May 14 The
exact screening date and time will be posted on the Facebook page mentioned
above.
I made this film to express my views and share my artistic vision, not to
make money. Finally, it will just posted on YouTube or Vimeo be seen free
of charge. But for now, the festival rules prevent that qualify. My goal is
to make a feature film full length that extends the story line of the PAX
universe. But it's a year or two. Now I just want to share the vision with
people sharing the same ideas as the South Korean players. I hope the
trailer whets your appetite Andi would like to hear the comments. My best
guess for the release of the short film for public viewing is six months.
I admire Roosh more I can say, having been similarly harassed by warriors
of social justice against me. Perhaps he will agree to be a consultant on
the feature film? I made this film with a balanced perspective instead of
the manifesto of the empowerment of women waited. But the mere hint that
the government that excludes women could succeed led to an effort to
silence my creative voice.
Instead of reasoned debate, some think I should t be allowed to express my
artistic opinion. In addition, I have openly promoted men's rights movement
(displayed links to South Korean products, for example), and I dare say
positive things about President Trump. I'm vilified and decimated my
reputation with lies.
Having practiced engineering for over 40 years, I'm used to face the truth
and facts. I learned that the arts community is in general close to spirit
and truth means nothing to them. I am amazed at their ability to lie
without hesitation, without guilt, without apology. Some artists & # 8221;
show total lack of character and honor. Any departure politically correct
report is not tolerated. This will be the subject of a future post. For
now, I plan to continue to make films that tell the truth and have a
different perspective.
For more information on the film and follow his journey to the end, visit
Pax Masculina.
Advertise your product or site on the return of kings
I just found a girl I grew up with is a "model Instagram"
I had another moment of enlightenment this week, and the timing couldn & #
8217; t be better. Just days after writing the article on how women have
lost touch with realistic expectations in the dating scene, my eyes were
forced open again.
I & # 8217, d recently heard of my mother's friends, who had lost contact
with his daughter. My mother used to keep actually said the girl children.
I grew up with her coming to my house every week, eat pancakes and playing
on the playground. I was not t friends with her out of it, but I knew the
girl as soon as when she was 7 or 8 (I m some years). It is quite cliche,
but imagine my reaction this week when my mother told me that she appeared
in Playboy.
It s All Grown Up
None of the photos on this page are the actual girl itself, but rather
illustrates the leading thirst currently sweeping through Instagram.
Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on how you look), my mother was on
the Playboy incorrect statement. It is it is just a few photo shoots
involving Playboy logo with some amateur photographers. It is certainly not
a model of Playboy, but just another of the models Instagram & # 8221; out
there on the internet. Girls with big followings and with it the typical
inflated egos, a life very limited, and in many cases, a soul completely
broken.
Among profile highlights include:
A picture saying don & # 8217 Girls; t like boys & # 8230; we love cats and
money & # 8221.
Many photos raves, with little stickers of stars substituted for bras.
A variety of hair colors & # 8212; blonde, brunette, red, neon pink, neon
green and neon blue. And my favorite & # 8212; Pink half purple half.
Some very suspicious shots in what appears to be high-end boats or private
aircraft that make me suspect that it participated in some of Dubai Porta
Potty action.
My first thought was just, Wow & # 8221.
This is a girl that I basically grew up with, plastering nude photos of
herself all over Instagram. Slurping the attention of thousands of hungry
guys, and live the high life. As I said, it's cliche. Obviously, I know a
lot about the distance of American culture as a whole fell.
But it is a completely different situation to see something like this
happen to someone you knew growing up. It is also incredibly depressing & #
8212, because growth, it was at least a nice enough girl. His mother and
father were great (although I think now that his father was a complete
wuss). She grew up in a good neighborhood, went to a good school, and was
apparently on track. Suggests that almost no one can resist the lure of
receiving so much attention on the Internet. Because all of Western culture
is built around instant gratification.
This leads me to my second point.
Looking to the future of this girl
That what struck me next: what the hell is this girl is going to do with
his life?
Let face it, & # 8221 model Instagram; is a pretty short career. The
barrier to entry is virtually zero & # 8212; a pretty girl can start
posting pictures of herself, she says her model, and get offers to get
money for ads, are winnowed out, and God knows what-else.
So what happens when these models have hit the wall? Well, they already
have a built-in audience. But what happens when the youngest and hottest
girls begin to grow larger than is theirs? Like any model, career life is
very short.
In this case, the girl is almost 24. She only 10k followers & # 8212;
really not much by global standards Instagram. Considering the fact that
women begin physical prime at 18 and ends at 25 (and possibly generous) & #
8212; his career is basically over already! And yes, it is only the
physical aspect that matters in the modeling world & # 8212; for obvious
reasons.
While you can put money on the fact that feminism as a whole to encourage
him to pursue a & # 8221 real career; Instagram after the show is over, it
doesn t have a college degree. It doesn t have a business, language or
applicable skills that would result in a real world job.
The question becomes & # 8212; & # 8217 which, aside for it?
Its species Chips
Many people here say she should collect his chips NOW # 8212; Chump find a
loan to pay the bill for his life and future offspring. An idiot willing to
look beyond the rear-scenes life of a model Instagram & # 8221; and still
put a ring on it. It should do so while she's still young and beautiful
with great value that it will never be in terms of the sexual market.
Of course we all know that will never happen.
To exit the projector in your first is something that humans are never
good. She thinks that attention, sponsorship offers and free gifts are
never going to end. Feminism will tell him to go with him, not to cash
their chips. After all, she has 30 years to find a good man and have
children, right?
She has at least a decade modeling prostitute before she should even
consider Instagram appearance in decline and start looking to the future.
But n t work like that. Many of these models are all Instagram lighting,
makeup and angles. They don t have the true beauty (some) paid models. They
do not have the personality and charm of the foreign girls. So even then
you have to consider the fact that many of these girls certainly does
charge as good in person as they do online. Therefore, the market value of
marriage is even lower it appears in the digital space.
And to top it all, the modeling lifestyle Instagram certainly going age
girls more quickly than normal. It seems all attend raves, music festivals,
and the extreme parties. With all these territories often comes the high
use of drugs, casual sex, and a hedonistic lifestyle General tattoos
permanently in 1000 the infamous deep Cock-Stare into their eyes.
The men are quite desperate. If that girl had to start early, she d find
someone to commit permanently to her fading looks. I overlook all
medications, all of gender, and the issue never further because he's afraid
to know. But she probably won t.
It & # 8217 continue the edge of the train until the money dries up, the
attention stops, and it's left to do anything in life except Collect cats.
Unfortunately, unlike his photo on cats and money & # 8212; she probably
won t have money in the bank. Come on, do you really think she'll save
anything?
Instead, she'll be left with nothing but memories of good days, a period
still pining for Dick Alpha, and the loneliness of knowing that his best
days are never coming back.
Meanwhile, a cute, healthy 18 year old daughter take selfie and upload it
to Instagram. She'll have to pursed lips, imitating a duck. She'll get
hundreds of comments and feel good about herself. She'll live the high life
& # 8212; all parties, drugs and alcohol, it can be desired.
It might even get a free trip to Dubai. Life will be a blur, with all the
fun parts, high-life and money she makes. And before it flashes, it'll be
over.
If you want to learn how to take advantage of dating in the digital world,
see my book Cracking OkCupid. To escape tips on American women to greener
pastures, see Eastern European travel.
Read more: How to meet women through Sugar Daddy dating sites
8217; t be better. Just days after writing the article on how women have
lost touch with realistic expectations in the dating scene, my eyes were
forced open again.
I & # 8217, d recently heard of my mother's friends, who had lost contact
with his daughter. My mother used to keep actually said the girl children.
I grew up with her coming to my house every week, eat pancakes and playing
on the playground. I was not t friends with her out of it, but I knew the
girl as soon as when she was 7 or 8 (I m some years). It is quite cliche,
but imagine my reaction this week when my mother told me that she appeared
in Playboy.
It s All Grown Up
None of the photos on this page are the actual girl itself, but rather
illustrates the leading thirst currently sweeping through Instagram.
Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on how you look), my mother was on
the Playboy incorrect statement. It is it is just a few photo shoots
involving Playboy logo with some amateur photographers. It is certainly not
a model of Playboy, but just another of the models Instagram & # 8221; out
there on the internet. Girls with big followings and with it the typical
inflated egos, a life very limited, and in many cases, a soul completely
broken.
Among profile highlights include:
A picture saying don & # 8217 Girls; t like boys & # 8230; we love cats and
money & # 8221.
Many photos raves, with little stickers of stars substituted for bras.
A variety of hair colors & # 8212; blonde, brunette, red, neon pink, neon
green and neon blue. And my favorite & # 8212; Pink half purple half.
Some very suspicious shots in what appears to be high-end boats or private
aircraft that make me suspect that it participated in some of Dubai Porta
Potty action.
My first thought was just, Wow & # 8221.
This is a girl that I basically grew up with, plastering nude photos of
herself all over Instagram. Slurping the attention of thousands of hungry
guys, and live the high life. As I said, it's cliche. Obviously, I know a
lot about the distance of American culture as a whole fell.
But it is a completely different situation to see something like this
happen to someone you knew growing up. It is also incredibly depressing & #
8212, because growth, it was at least a nice enough girl. His mother and
father were great (although I think now that his father was a complete
wuss). She grew up in a good neighborhood, went to a good school, and was
apparently on track. Suggests that almost no one can resist the lure of
receiving so much attention on the Internet. Because all of Western culture
is built around instant gratification.
This leads me to my second point.
Looking to the future of this girl
That what struck me next: what the hell is this girl is going to do with
his life?
Let face it, & # 8221 model Instagram; is a pretty short career. The
barrier to entry is virtually zero & # 8212; a pretty girl can start
posting pictures of herself, she says her model, and get offers to get
money for ads, are winnowed out, and God knows what-else.
So what happens when these models have hit the wall? Well, they already
have a built-in audience. But what happens when the youngest and hottest
girls begin to grow larger than is theirs? Like any model, career life is
very short.
In this case, the girl is almost 24. She only 10k followers & # 8212;
really not much by global standards Instagram. Considering the fact that
women begin physical prime at 18 and ends at 25 (and possibly generous) & #
8212; his career is basically over already! And yes, it is only the
physical aspect that matters in the modeling world & # 8212; for obvious
reasons.
While you can put money on the fact that feminism as a whole to encourage
him to pursue a & # 8221 real career; Instagram after the show is over, it
doesn t have a college degree. It doesn t have a business, language or
applicable skills that would result in a real world job.
The question becomes & # 8212; & # 8217 which, aside for it?
Its species Chips
Many people here say she should collect his chips NOW # 8212; Chump find a
loan to pay the bill for his life and future offspring. An idiot willing to
look beyond the rear-scenes life of a model Instagram & # 8221; and still
put a ring on it. It should do so while she's still young and beautiful
with great value that it will never be in terms of the sexual market.
Of course we all know that will never happen.
To exit the projector in your first is something that humans are never
good. She thinks that attention, sponsorship offers and free gifts are
never going to end. Feminism will tell him to go with him, not to cash
their chips. After all, she has 30 years to find a good man and have
children, right?
She has at least a decade modeling prostitute before she should even
consider Instagram appearance in decline and start looking to the future.
But n t work like that. Many of these models are all Instagram lighting,
makeup and angles. They don t have the true beauty (some) paid models. They
do not have the personality and charm of the foreign girls. So even then
you have to consider the fact that many of these girls certainly does
charge as good in person as they do online. Therefore, the market value of
marriage is even lower it appears in the digital space.
And to top it all, the modeling lifestyle Instagram certainly going age
girls more quickly than normal. It seems all attend raves, music festivals,
and the extreme parties. With all these territories often comes the high
use of drugs, casual sex, and a hedonistic lifestyle General tattoos
permanently in 1000 the infamous deep Cock-Stare into their eyes.
The men are quite desperate. If that girl had to start early, she d find
someone to commit permanently to her fading looks. I overlook all
medications, all of gender, and the issue never further because he's afraid
to know. But she probably won t.
It & # 8217 continue the edge of the train until the money dries up, the
attention stops, and it's left to do anything in life except Collect cats.
Unfortunately, unlike his photo on cats and money & # 8212; she probably
won t have money in the bank. Come on, do you really think she'll save
anything?
Instead, she'll be left with nothing but memories of good days, a period
still pining for Dick Alpha, and the loneliness of knowing that his best
days are never coming back.
Meanwhile, a cute, healthy 18 year old daughter take selfie and upload it
to Instagram. She'll have to pursed lips, imitating a duck. She'll get
hundreds of comments and feel good about herself. She'll live the high life
& # 8212; all parties, drugs and alcohol, it can be desired.
It might even get a free trip to Dubai. Life will be a blur, with all the
fun parts, high-life and money she makes. And before it flashes, it'll be
over.
If you want to learn how to take advantage of dating in the digital world,
see my book Cracking OkCupid. To escape tips on American women to greener
pastures, see Eastern European travel.
Read more: How to meet women through Sugar Daddy dating sites
5 ways Foolishly TRADING our freedom for "security"
Ben Franklin said it best.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
But social engineering Americans have no idea of the culture obsessed
with security that they live not only deprives them to live a full life,
he's always making them liable to a nanny and the police state .
Corporate Governance The complex and their puppets in the media constantly
create safety and security issues so that nebulous term that you REPRESENTS
can pass law after law & # 8221 protected; s you when you actually put in a
legal cage.
Here are 5 ways corporate governance complex used security concerns to
benefit the people.
5. Weather
Carbon taxes will end on bad weather, say the government propagandists
Bad weather has been with humanity since the beginning. It's not going.
But the media is now on quite normal, if devastating weather events as if
they're something unusual. The tornado that struck the Midwest was spun by
the exhaust pipe of your car. No matter the number of tornado was the
lowest in recent years and we are in the midst of a drought hurricanes.
Each year, the securities become more strident than any wind, fire, drought
is caused by you. Fear, because nature is angry.
How to soothe you with her? By giving your car and pay taxes on the air you
breathe in your all-powerful overlords in government who will use them to
stop tornadoes, floods and hailstorms.
Well, not quite. Al Gore had in recent weeks calling for $ 15 billion of
your money. Once they steal from you, the power structure will use the
carbon tax at global level to establish a global governance from a body
that has the power to tax the world is by default a world government.
4. Sex
Fear of sex allows government control of that & # 8221 products; as well as
Government propagandists took the child's game to a new level cooties. As I
pointed out before, using the government's own statistics, it is almost
impossible to contract HIV / AIDS heterosexual vaginal intercourse and oral
sex. His critics have called the terror of the plague, as the government
regularly terrorizes its citizens fear campaigns like this.
That's not enough. Your masters want sex terrify you with new and creative
ways.
New creative ways to create problems that don t exist to create profits are
being developed. Now, a line of traffic of human beings wave was invented
by spinmeisters as a way to eliminate prostitution worldwide. The program
is in its infancy, but do not be deceived that's what its objectives are.
Even the officers of the law enforcement admit, it's a phantom enemy in
many ways.
We had to protect sex letting the government control of each one avenue. We
got to protect Womyns because they're strong and independent but are so
weak that they can t make decisions about whether they want the screw after
a beer.
3. TSA
As you take your pants for TSA, remember that it's to protect your freedom
People are naturally afraid of flying. The government takes this fear by
manipulating a terrorist threat, many believe it is the leading cause of
first place, and turns you into someone equivalent entering the prison than
someone preparing to fly the sky friendly to your local airport.
TSA has never been a terrorist. This, even if people regularly sexually
assault at airports, feeling your aunt's breasts Irish whipping someone in
a burqa through the security barrier, no questions asked.
Two legs good, four legs bad farm animals.
It's also psychological manipulation, the government now has scanners which
citizens stand with their hands like a criminal every time they pass
through them. white hot rage passes through me every time I have to ask
like a criminal and radiograph (the spinmeisters now call this scanning
millimeter wave & # 8211;? have you noticed this phrase ride to the
airport) just to get my seat on the next flight out.
TSA is an excellent example of the Government fucking with people.
2. Illegal Immigration
Illegal immigration is the gift that keeps on giving freedom as one after
another attacked while the problem is resolved never
The government likes the problem of illegal immigration. They don t want to
go far.
Solve the online illegal immigration problem malarkey is an excellent
example of how the government has stripped Americans of fundamental
freedoms while leaving hordes continue to arrive at the border.
Examples? There is a lot of. There are only a few years, Americans used to
be able to walk or cross the border and return to America with licensed
driver. Now you need to send bureaucrats about $ 150 and several documents
to obtain a passport. Then you are asked? What were you doing in Mexico as
it's all the government's damn business what you were doing.
Marco Rubio, a former presidential candidate, revealed another piece of the
elite milk plan for the problem of immigration, and deprive more of your
freedoms away. Here's what TNMM wrote during the campaign:
Rubio said once again we need an Orwellian visa tracking system to ensure
that people do not overstay when they come to America. This will be in
addition to other measures draconian police state border that always end up
punishing people who follow the law than people who break it. But a
database that tracks each entry and when someone "the time" we take drastic
measures to expel or fine them? I realize conservatives probably like this
idea because they continue to be walled in the police state, but my concern
is what happens when this measure is spreading around the world? Then we
will not be able to escape our human farm longer.
This visa tracking system would be the first step to turn your money and
other resources if you're over in another country, or were outside the
United States longer than your masters saw fit.
It seems that the only people who aren t required to have excessive amounts
of identification are illegal themselves.
1. Guns
The second amendment will be reduced to nothing by default, not by direct
repeal
Without the Second Amendment, the United States is already under abject
tyranny rather than the soft tyranny and fuzzy that we have now. Although
Toyota Prius kills people at a higher rate per 100,000 that weapons are,
the government uses the death of 1,000 slashes method to gut the Second
Amendment.
They do not have to repeal. All they have to do is to create fear on arms,
then they're illegal in so many places, it becomes quite impossible to
possess.
Media propagandists stir the Eddies out there in public that say
virtuously, From my cold hands, dead & # 8221 !; regarding the second
amendment, while not noticing the amendment, like so many others on the
Bill of Rights has been gutted and is more a symbol than anything else.
Of course, you can always buy and own firearms and the Americans are
happily armed to the teeth. But every year, another straw is added to the
camel's back with this law and the order, and politics. The ultimate goal
is to nullify the second amendment by default, without ever actually repeal.
dangerous freedom
What freedoms that remains other than deciding where to shop and what meals
rich in calories to eat at a restaurant
Once the government gives all Americans a & # 8221; safe; world to live,
not only invade s lives by all means above but micromanaging their conduct
with the front and rear cams dashboard (already accounted for legislation
in the trucking industry, then in your car & # 8211; a camera watching you
every time your drive), we will all live in our own Truman Show.
As Dwight Eisenhower said:
If you want total security, go to prison. You're fed, clothed, given
medical care and so on. The only thing missing & # 8230; is freedom.
Remember that the next time a government bureaucrat wants & # 8221
protected; you. Meanwhile, Americans continue to eat cake while their
officials are turning the public servants rather than themselves.
More: the foundations of the security of firearms
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
But social engineering Americans have no idea of the culture obsessed
with security that they live not only deprives them to live a full life,
he's always making them liable to a nanny and the police state .
Corporate Governance The complex and their puppets in the media constantly
create safety and security issues so that nebulous term that you REPRESENTS
can pass law after law & # 8221 protected; s you when you actually put in a
legal cage.
Here are 5 ways corporate governance complex used security concerns to
benefit the people.
5. Weather
Carbon taxes will end on bad weather, say the government propagandists
Bad weather has been with humanity since the beginning. It's not going.
But the media is now on quite normal, if devastating weather events as if
they're something unusual. The tornado that struck the Midwest was spun by
the exhaust pipe of your car. No matter the number of tornado was the
lowest in recent years and we are in the midst of a drought hurricanes.
Each year, the securities become more strident than any wind, fire, drought
is caused by you. Fear, because nature is angry.
How to soothe you with her? By giving your car and pay taxes on the air you
breathe in your all-powerful overlords in government who will use them to
stop tornadoes, floods and hailstorms.
Well, not quite. Al Gore had in recent weeks calling for $ 15 billion of
your money. Once they steal from you, the power structure will use the
carbon tax at global level to establish a global governance from a body
that has the power to tax the world is by default a world government.
4. Sex
Fear of sex allows government control of that & # 8221 products; as well as
Government propagandists took the child's game to a new level cooties. As I
pointed out before, using the government's own statistics, it is almost
impossible to contract HIV / AIDS heterosexual vaginal intercourse and oral
sex. His critics have called the terror of the plague, as the government
regularly terrorizes its citizens fear campaigns like this.
That's not enough. Your masters want sex terrify you with new and creative
ways.
New creative ways to create problems that don t exist to create profits are
being developed. Now, a line of traffic of human beings wave was invented
by spinmeisters as a way to eliminate prostitution worldwide. The program
is in its infancy, but do not be deceived that's what its objectives are.
Even the officers of the law enforcement admit, it's a phantom enemy in
many ways.
We had to protect sex letting the government control of each one avenue. We
got to protect Womyns because they're strong and independent but are so
weak that they can t make decisions about whether they want the screw after
a beer.
3. TSA
As you take your pants for TSA, remember that it's to protect your freedom
People are naturally afraid of flying. The government takes this fear by
manipulating a terrorist threat, many believe it is the leading cause of
first place, and turns you into someone equivalent entering the prison than
someone preparing to fly the sky friendly to your local airport.
TSA has never been a terrorist. This, even if people regularly sexually
assault at airports, feeling your aunt's breasts Irish whipping someone in
a burqa through the security barrier, no questions asked.
Two legs good, four legs bad farm animals.
It's also psychological manipulation, the government now has scanners which
citizens stand with their hands like a criminal every time they pass
through them. white hot rage passes through me every time I have to ask
like a criminal and radiograph (the spinmeisters now call this scanning
millimeter wave & # 8211;? have you noticed this phrase ride to the
airport) just to get my seat on the next flight out.
TSA is an excellent example of the Government fucking with people.
2. Illegal Immigration
Illegal immigration is the gift that keeps on giving freedom as one after
another attacked while the problem is resolved never
The government likes the problem of illegal immigration. They don t want to
go far.
Solve the online illegal immigration problem malarkey is an excellent
example of how the government has stripped Americans of fundamental
freedoms while leaving hordes continue to arrive at the border.
Examples? There is a lot of. There are only a few years, Americans used to
be able to walk or cross the border and return to America with licensed
driver. Now you need to send bureaucrats about $ 150 and several documents
to obtain a passport. Then you are asked? What were you doing in Mexico as
it's all the government's damn business what you were doing.
Marco Rubio, a former presidential candidate, revealed another piece of the
elite milk plan for the problem of immigration, and deprive more of your
freedoms away. Here's what TNMM wrote during the campaign:
Rubio said once again we need an Orwellian visa tracking system to ensure
that people do not overstay when they come to America. This will be in
addition to other measures draconian police state border that always end up
punishing people who follow the law than people who break it. But a
database that tracks each entry and when someone "the time" we take drastic
measures to expel or fine them? I realize conservatives probably like this
idea because they continue to be walled in the police state, but my concern
is what happens when this measure is spreading around the world? Then we
will not be able to escape our human farm longer.
This visa tracking system would be the first step to turn your money and
other resources if you're over in another country, or were outside the
United States longer than your masters saw fit.
It seems that the only people who aren t required to have excessive amounts
of identification are illegal themselves.
1. Guns
The second amendment will be reduced to nothing by default, not by direct
repeal
Without the Second Amendment, the United States is already under abject
tyranny rather than the soft tyranny and fuzzy that we have now. Although
Toyota Prius kills people at a higher rate per 100,000 that weapons are,
the government uses the death of 1,000 slashes method to gut the Second
Amendment.
They do not have to repeal. All they have to do is to create fear on arms,
then they're illegal in so many places, it becomes quite impossible to
possess.
Media propagandists stir the Eddies out there in public that say
virtuously, From my cold hands, dead & # 8221 !; regarding the second
amendment, while not noticing the amendment, like so many others on the
Bill of Rights has been gutted and is more a symbol than anything else.
Of course, you can always buy and own firearms and the Americans are
happily armed to the teeth. But every year, another straw is added to the
camel's back with this law and the order, and politics. The ultimate goal
is to nullify the second amendment by default, without ever actually repeal.
dangerous freedom
What freedoms that remains other than deciding where to shop and what meals
rich in calories to eat at a restaurant
Once the government gives all Americans a & # 8221; safe; world to live,
not only invade s lives by all means above but micromanaging their conduct
with the front and rear cams dashboard (already accounted for legislation
in the trucking industry, then in your car & # 8211; a camera watching you
every time your drive), we will all live in our own Truman Show.
As Dwight Eisenhower said:
If you want total security, go to prison. You're fed, clothed, given
medical care and so on. The only thing missing & # 8230; is freedom.
Remember that the next time a government bureaucrat wants & # 8221
protected; you. Meanwhile, Americans continue to eat cake while their
officials are turning the public servants rather than themselves.
More: the foundations of the security of firearms
Monday, May 1, 2017
5 important ideas Red pilled British economist Peter Bauer
Overall, ROK leans toward an anti-Socialist, anti-globalization, and
anti-equal position. We can add pro-Western, although there is no consensus
on the extent to which traditional culture is preferred in modern or vice
versa.
As I see it, it is essential to distinguish the constructive elements of
destruction, whether traditional or not, and including protectionism
against free trade. Moreover, it is of major importance to update things in
the current situation, stick to almost perpetual principles if some have
proven worthy and stood the test of time.
These positions do not come from nowhere, based on whim and sentiment, but
based on facts, logic and historical realities. However, a significant
proportion of academics seem to distort reality rather than explain & #
8211; or at least that describe selective parts of it, while ignoring what
does not fit into their ideological framework & # 8211; but some have
managed to accurately describe how things are made and connected.
The British economist Budapest-born Péter Tamás Bauer (1915-2002) is one
such figure, which throughout its years of activity has swallowed the red
pill and decided to explain the economic and material realities beyond the
philantrophic positivity, wishful thinking and irrational fears of the
future.
In his work Equality, the Third World, and Economic Delusion (1981), many
of its basic ideas related to egalitarianism, economic freedom and growth,
the policies of foreign aid and trade are discussed depth. While some, many
are partly true again now outdated and I focused on those who still adhere
to the real world. However, I finished a few areas that have been developed
since Bauer's work was written, associated for example with developmental
psychology and personality, as well as the economy.
1. Egalitarianism is based on false assumptions
The reason is egalitarianism a bad starting point is the company that is
based on false assumptions. The ability to create wealth is largely related
to the ability and work ethic. Bauer understood and stressed that these are
some of the main factors underpinning economic success, whether at the
individual or collective level.
People differ in economic ability as in artistic, intellectual, musical and
sports. In particular, they are distinguished by their ability to perceive
and utilize economic opportunities. Ready to seize economic opportunities
is of great importance to explain the economic differences in open
societies.
eminent psychologists like Arthur Jensen, not least in his book The G
Factor (1998) have shown that economic success is highly correlated with
IQ, but features such as consciousness and Machiavellianism are indeed also
critical factors in matter of taking advantage of opportunities.
Donald Trump is an example of how this industrious person and cunning has
managed to be a successful entrepreneur. Or Ingvar Kamprad, the Swede who
founded IKEA, for that matter.
But the fact that many left-leaning liberals and globalists have
assimilated with equal fairness is problematic, according to Bauer. After
all, because of the differences mentioned above equal opportunities often
create uneven results, materially and economically, but is it really unfair
that some people earn more than others?
Decades after publication of Bauer's book, a discursive focus in the left
increased opportunities compared to equity, the idea that people born in
poor countries tend to miss opportunities and will therefore unequity
inevitably suffer.
It is indeed a real obstacle to any universalist, but becomes quite
misguiding when the left is looking at the issue. The Chinese are not happy
in the pure communist rule, and it was only until Deng Xiaoping's reforms
in the 1970s and the end before that improved things for them. Ironically
leftist social engineering has never been particularly effective in the
treatment of inequalities and create better societies, as Bauer shows.
Failed states like Venezuela and North Korea can not be, at least partially
cured by stable economic policies such as the market economy, made possible
by a relatively incorruptible ruling class.
That said, one wonders whether it is fair that the US super-rich
entrepreneurs, whatever their merits, earning as much as they do. But we
say s Scandinavian social democratic model is not an option if we try to
correct it, because it is essentially anti-business, creates problems
wellness dysgenic, and can even lead to more inequality economic because of
imported new lower class.
2. The big daddy government treats people like children
Another important aspect is that Bauer discusses the state of management,
or whatever you prefer to call it, treats adults like children. Bauer found
a striking resemblance between income after taxes and spending money:
old age, disease, the development of children and the interruption of
earnings, these are contingencies of life to pay to get out of a s income,
for which adults can expect to be provided by savings or insurance. In many
Western countries provision for these contingencies came to be supported
largely by the state. Given that the provision can not be adapted to the
very different circumstances of individuals and families, it is likely to
be both expensive and unsatisfactory. This provision is necessarily
financed by taxes. As a result, many people's after-tax income becomes like
spending money that is not needed for major necessities and dangers of life
because they are paid by taxes largely imposed on them- same. This
redistribution of responsibilities involved in the operation of the welfare
state means reducing the status of adults than children.
Since people differ in skill, they make even regarding the ability to make
appropriate decisions, but if the state & # 8221 deprives; the well-being,
they are forced to take responsibility and act like adults.
It is not always easy and some will be treated unfair balance in ways that
are not the results of individual faults, but if one also considers the
fact that taxes are high while the actual quality of social security does
not match the tax rates, it is reasonable to significantly reduce the size
of the welfare state.
3. The fear of population growth has been misdirected
Bauer points out, with examples from both the West and parts of Asia, the
population growth was a false fear. In fact, many nations have flourished
in conjunction with population growth. The Malthusian trap of having too
many mouths to feed and too much body away, was solved by agrarian and
industrial techniques, improved communications and science. It is actually
sparsely populated nations that have suffered the most, mainly because of
poor communication and inefficient storage facilities.
However, the living conditions for the largest share of people in places
such as Nigeria, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia and Brazil are pretty bad
and food shortages are or could be a real obstacle for them . Especially if
one takes the link between wealth and IQ into account. If modern
development is part of the equation, these problems can escalate.
Therefore, family planning, somewhat similar to that of China, perhaps a
good thing in some national contexts. If the state could create incentives
for the small proportion of educated people to have more children, while
simultaneously creating incentives for the lower classes to have fewer
children, it could be beneficial for these countries in their entireties .
In addition, Bauer neglects the welfare of animals, such as extreme
anthropocentrism unfettered led to the extinction of animal species as a
result of economic development. It is likely that this trend will continue
until the improvement of techniques may allow less harmful to the growth
patterns of the environment.
As for unemployment, I think it is difficult to make even tentative
suggestions for the future, but the robots that replace part or mostly
human labor are of course part of the equation.
4. Assistance to the Third World is largely based on false assumptions
Another important subject that deals Bauer is the third world aid, and
equal as the concept is based on false assumptions. When economists Wishful
Thinking and doing good ISTS make plans for the Third World, it is based on
extrapolation models which implies that as long as rich countries give a
certain proportion of their total GDP every year, while countries poor
prosper.
The problem is that extrapolations should be based on reality, and each not
met outside the philanthropic matrix. Infrastructure must be developed in
fact, bridges are to be built, violence must be treated and so on, and that
far from being reached in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
Instead of many nations of the first world that sponsored the Ghanaian
economist George Ayittey called black neo-colonialism, namely cleptocratic
African leaders who fill their own pockets rather than building their
postcolonial nations. For example, my home country, Sweden, has supported
dictatorships like Uganda.
5. The West has made the rest of the prosperous world rather than the other
One of the most absurd notions of the left, including academics, is that
the Western world is rich at the expense of various developing countries.
Things are not black and white and there is some empirical support for the
theory of Immanuel Wallerstein world-systems, but Bauer, Michael Chisholm,
Niall Ferguson, Charles Murray, among others have shown that, overall, it
is Indeed not.
In fact, just need to know a few basic contemporary East Asian history to
realize that countries like South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan are high in
large part because of the West, the United States in particular, rather
than the opposite.
While the work of Bauer may seem dated, it gave us a lot of
thought-provoking conclusions on how we can deal with our modern problems.
More: 3 lessons political economist Alberto Alesina
anti-equal position. We can add pro-Western, although there is no consensus
on the extent to which traditional culture is preferred in modern or vice
versa.
As I see it, it is essential to distinguish the constructive elements of
destruction, whether traditional or not, and including protectionism
against free trade. Moreover, it is of major importance to update things in
the current situation, stick to almost perpetual principles if some have
proven worthy and stood the test of time.
These positions do not come from nowhere, based on whim and sentiment, but
based on facts, logic and historical realities. However, a significant
proportion of academics seem to distort reality rather than explain & #
8211; or at least that describe selective parts of it, while ignoring what
does not fit into their ideological framework & # 8211; but some have
managed to accurately describe how things are made and connected.
The British economist Budapest-born Péter Tamás Bauer (1915-2002) is one
such figure, which throughout its years of activity has swallowed the red
pill and decided to explain the economic and material realities beyond the
philantrophic positivity, wishful thinking and irrational fears of the
future.
In his work Equality, the Third World, and Economic Delusion (1981), many
of its basic ideas related to egalitarianism, economic freedom and growth,
the policies of foreign aid and trade are discussed depth. While some, many
are partly true again now outdated and I focused on those who still adhere
to the real world. However, I finished a few areas that have been developed
since Bauer's work was written, associated for example with developmental
psychology and personality, as well as the economy.
1. Egalitarianism is based on false assumptions
The reason is egalitarianism a bad starting point is the company that is
based on false assumptions. The ability to create wealth is largely related
to the ability and work ethic. Bauer understood and stressed that these are
some of the main factors underpinning economic success, whether at the
individual or collective level.
People differ in economic ability as in artistic, intellectual, musical and
sports. In particular, they are distinguished by their ability to perceive
and utilize economic opportunities. Ready to seize economic opportunities
is of great importance to explain the economic differences in open
societies.
eminent psychologists like Arthur Jensen, not least in his book The G
Factor (1998) have shown that economic success is highly correlated with
IQ, but features such as consciousness and Machiavellianism are indeed also
critical factors in matter of taking advantage of opportunities.
Donald Trump is an example of how this industrious person and cunning has
managed to be a successful entrepreneur. Or Ingvar Kamprad, the Swede who
founded IKEA, for that matter.
But the fact that many left-leaning liberals and globalists have
assimilated with equal fairness is problematic, according to Bauer. After
all, because of the differences mentioned above equal opportunities often
create uneven results, materially and economically, but is it really unfair
that some people earn more than others?
Decades after publication of Bauer's book, a discursive focus in the left
increased opportunities compared to equity, the idea that people born in
poor countries tend to miss opportunities and will therefore unequity
inevitably suffer.
It is indeed a real obstacle to any universalist, but becomes quite
misguiding when the left is looking at the issue. The Chinese are not happy
in the pure communist rule, and it was only until Deng Xiaoping's reforms
in the 1970s and the end before that improved things for them. Ironically
leftist social engineering has never been particularly effective in the
treatment of inequalities and create better societies, as Bauer shows.
Failed states like Venezuela and North Korea can not be, at least partially
cured by stable economic policies such as the market economy, made possible
by a relatively incorruptible ruling class.
That said, one wonders whether it is fair that the US super-rich
entrepreneurs, whatever their merits, earning as much as they do. But we
say s Scandinavian social democratic model is not an option if we try to
correct it, because it is essentially anti-business, creates problems
wellness dysgenic, and can even lead to more inequality economic because of
imported new lower class.
2. The big daddy government treats people like children
Another important aspect is that Bauer discusses the state of management,
or whatever you prefer to call it, treats adults like children. Bauer found
a striking resemblance between income after taxes and spending money:
old age, disease, the development of children and the interruption of
earnings, these are contingencies of life to pay to get out of a s income,
for which adults can expect to be provided by savings or insurance. In many
Western countries provision for these contingencies came to be supported
largely by the state. Given that the provision can not be adapted to the
very different circumstances of individuals and families, it is likely to
be both expensive and unsatisfactory. This provision is necessarily
financed by taxes. As a result, many people's after-tax income becomes like
spending money that is not needed for major necessities and dangers of life
because they are paid by taxes largely imposed on them- same. This
redistribution of responsibilities involved in the operation of the welfare
state means reducing the status of adults than children.
Since people differ in skill, they make even regarding the ability to make
appropriate decisions, but if the state & # 8221 deprives; the well-being,
they are forced to take responsibility and act like adults.
It is not always easy and some will be treated unfair balance in ways that
are not the results of individual faults, but if one also considers the
fact that taxes are high while the actual quality of social security does
not match the tax rates, it is reasonable to significantly reduce the size
of the welfare state.
3. The fear of population growth has been misdirected
Bauer points out, with examples from both the West and parts of Asia, the
population growth was a false fear. In fact, many nations have flourished
in conjunction with population growth. The Malthusian trap of having too
many mouths to feed and too much body away, was solved by agrarian and
industrial techniques, improved communications and science. It is actually
sparsely populated nations that have suffered the most, mainly because of
poor communication and inefficient storage facilities.
However, the living conditions for the largest share of people in places
such as Nigeria, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia and Brazil are pretty bad
and food shortages are or could be a real obstacle for them . Especially if
one takes the link between wealth and IQ into account. If modern
development is part of the equation, these problems can escalate.
Therefore, family planning, somewhat similar to that of China, perhaps a
good thing in some national contexts. If the state could create incentives
for the small proportion of educated people to have more children, while
simultaneously creating incentives for the lower classes to have fewer
children, it could be beneficial for these countries in their entireties .
In addition, Bauer neglects the welfare of animals, such as extreme
anthropocentrism unfettered led to the extinction of animal species as a
result of economic development. It is likely that this trend will continue
until the improvement of techniques may allow less harmful to the growth
patterns of the environment.
As for unemployment, I think it is difficult to make even tentative
suggestions for the future, but the robots that replace part or mostly
human labor are of course part of the equation.
4. Assistance to the Third World is largely based on false assumptions
Another important subject that deals Bauer is the third world aid, and
equal as the concept is based on false assumptions. When economists Wishful
Thinking and doing good ISTS make plans for the Third World, it is based on
extrapolation models which implies that as long as rich countries give a
certain proportion of their total GDP every year, while countries poor
prosper.
The problem is that extrapolations should be based on reality, and each not
met outside the philanthropic matrix. Infrastructure must be developed in
fact, bridges are to be built, violence must be treated and so on, and that
far from being reached in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
Instead of many nations of the first world that sponsored the Ghanaian
economist George Ayittey called black neo-colonialism, namely cleptocratic
African leaders who fill their own pockets rather than building their
postcolonial nations. For example, my home country, Sweden, has supported
dictatorships like Uganda.
5. The West has made the rest of the prosperous world rather than the other
One of the most absurd notions of the left, including academics, is that
the Western world is rich at the expense of various developing countries.
Things are not black and white and there is some empirical support for the
theory of Immanuel Wallerstein world-systems, but Bauer, Michael Chisholm,
Niall Ferguson, Charles Murray, among others have shown that, overall, it
is Indeed not.
In fact, just need to know a few basic contemporary East Asian history to
realize that countries like South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan are high in
large part because of the West, the United States in particular, rather
than the opposite.
While the work of Bauer may seem dated, it gave us a lot of
thought-provoking conclusions on how we can deal with our modern problems.
More: 3 lessons political economist Alberto Alesina
How ISIS plans to conquer and manage Infidel "Savages"
Observers of political and military events in the Middle East can not fail
to notice the extreme violence of ISIS methods. They seek to control the
local population, or to engage in combat operations against an armed enemy,
ISIS members did not hesitate a moment to adopt the most brutal tactics. In
the cultural field, the militant group was equally ruthless: he thinks
nothing of obliterating the historical and cultural treasures of the
regions it occupies. Is there a method to this madness? Is it part of a
coordinated strategic vision, or is blind ignorance of a group of wild
unnamed?
It would be a grave mistake to underestimate or ISIS ideology. Any group
that can attract new members ready to fight until death must have our full
attention. Beyond this, the words of Isis show that there is indeed a
constant, if demented logic in everything they do. Military planners must
never forget, as they must never forget that while North Korea is not done
for a purpose.
It turns out that ISIS has made the world a favor by spreading his theories
in a book called Managing Savagery: The most critical stage through which
the Umma will pass. This manifesto, published by Abu Bakr Naji and
translated two years later by William McCants, establish a detailed program
on how to create the conditions necessary for the Islamic state.
We must understand that the word "savage" in this context does not refer
to "terror". It refers to non-Muslims and Muslims who do not accept ISIS.
In other words, ISIS is considered "pure" and the rest of the world
as "savages" that must be tamed and civilized. No doubt all fringe groups
or collection of quirky believes, but the difference is that ISIS control
still considerable stretches of territory and can field fighters who are
willing to fight to the last bullet.
First phase
What are the essential elements of the doctrine of taming the "wild"? It
can be broken down into a three-step program. The first phase is
frustrating and exhausting the enemy. ISIS recognizes that it can not cope
with all the power of modern military forces of the world face to face
engagement. It therefore seeks to draw his opponents into long-term
attrition wars that undermine the strength of their opponents. ISIS calls
it the "power of vexation and exhaustion. "
There is nothing new in this: the guerrilla forces have been doing this for
centuries. The difference appears to be depressing the will of the United
States and its allies to take the bait. Here, for example, the author
describes some of the reasons why the Soviet Union was defeated in
Afghanistan:
This is exactly what happened to the communist superpower when it was put
into a military confrontation with a lower power than himself several
degrees; he was not even comparable. However, (the lowest) managed to
militarily exhausted and, more importantly, it activates the elements of
acculturation in (the superpower ies) of origin:
& # 8211; The dogma of atheism systems against the belief that believe in
the next life and God.
& # 8211; The love of the world, worldly pleasures and opulence compared to
people who had nothing to lose.
& # 8211; The moral corruption, the slightest manifestation of which was
the Russian soldiers and officers returned (home) & # 8212; if revenue & #
8212; and found that their wives had a child or a relationship with someone
else.
& # 8211; social inequities clearly floated to the surface when the
weakened economic situation because of the war. Then when money gets tight
and monetary crises begin, the great thieves appear, especially if accurate
accounting begins. [Text, p. 19]
second phase
The second phase of the ISIS strategy is to establish its own parallel
governance structure in areas it controls. What does it mean? It requires
firms and markets remain open, he set up Islamic courts and schools,
and "educates" the local population in the principles of Salafi Islam.
There are several years it has even started issuing its own currency and
passports.
Although these initiatives reached wide acceptance, the point was made: We,
the Islamic state, are an alternative to existing corrupt governments. We
can do better. Unfortunately, this pitch is not without its attractions in
areas that were decimated by years of sanctions, war and chaos.
third phase
The third phase of the ISIS program involves a review of how to expand the
radical message in other countries. The idea is that the bold, radical and
violent action by ISIS in the Middle East triggered franchises "benefits"
in other parts of the world. This idea is not as ridiculous as it sounds.
Like communist movements were attractive at some point in many parts of the
Third World, for other forms of radicalism are now available to fill the
void once occupied by communist insurgencies. These are some of the factors
to consider in choosing the country "" to the insurgency:
Factors taken into consideration when selecting the countries:
Regarding the common bonds between states where regions of savagery may
INTO BEING, we notice that some or all of the factors (below) concern:
& # 8211; The presence of geographic depth and topography allowed in each
separate state, the establishment of the regions which are managed by the
system of administration of savagery.
& # 8211; The weakness of the regime in power and the weakness of the
centralization of power in the peripheries of the borders of his state and
sometimes in internal areas, especially those that are overloaded.
& # 8211; The presence of jihadist, Islamic expansion spreads in these
regions.
& # 8211; The nature of the people in these regions. This is a matter in
which God has given preference to one place to another.
& # 8211; Similarly, the distribution of weapons by people who are in these
areas. [Text, p. 38]
Overall, there is a coherent program here in many religious cant
environment. It is organized, logical, and was implemented fanatically
where its members have been able to do so. Some international powers
believe that they can use ISIS on a basis for others as a kind of battering
ram to break down the secular regimes they do not like (eg, Syria). Those
who believe that they are deluding themselves. ISIS can be rented, but
never owned; and once he is finished taking the money with one hand, he
quickly devour the same hand. Never forget.
Read more: Is Destroying Pope Francis The Catholic Church?
to notice the extreme violence of ISIS methods. They seek to control the
local population, or to engage in combat operations against an armed enemy,
ISIS members did not hesitate a moment to adopt the most brutal tactics. In
the cultural field, the militant group was equally ruthless: he thinks
nothing of obliterating the historical and cultural treasures of the
regions it occupies. Is there a method to this madness? Is it part of a
coordinated strategic vision, or is blind ignorance of a group of wild
unnamed?
It would be a grave mistake to underestimate or ISIS ideology. Any group
that can attract new members ready to fight until death must have our full
attention. Beyond this, the words of Isis show that there is indeed a
constant, if demented logic in everything they do. Military planners must
never forget, as they must never forget that while North Korea is not done
for a purpose.
It turns out that ISIS has made the world a favor by spreading his theories
in a book called Managing Savagery: The most critical stage through which
the Umma will pass. This manifesto, published by Abu Bakr Naji and
translated two years later by William McCants, establish a detailed program
on how to create the conditions necessary for the Islamic state.
We must understand that the word "savage" in this context does not refer
to "terror". It refers to non-Muslims and Muslims who do not accept ISIS.
In other words, ISIS is considered "pure" and the rest of the world
as "savages" that must be tamed and civilized. No doubt all fringe groups
or collection of quirky believes, but the difference is that ISIS control
still considerable stretches of territory and can field fighters who are
willing to fight to the last bullet.
First phase
What are the essential elements of the doctrine of taming the "wild"? It
can be broken down into a three-step program. The first phase is
frustrating and exhausting the enemy. ISIS recognizes that it can not cope
with all the power of modern military forces of the world face to face
engagement. It therefore seeks to draw his opponents into long-term
attrition wars that undermine the strength of their opponents. ISIS calls
it the "power of vexation and exhaustion. "
There is nothing new in this: the guerrilla forces have been doing this for
centuries. The difference appears to be depressing the will of the United
States and its allies to take the bait. Here, for example, the author
describes some of the reasons why the Soviet Union was defeated in
Afghanistan:
This is exactly what happened to the communist superpower when it was put
into a military confrontation with a lower power than himself several
degrees; he was not even comparable. However, (the lowest) managed to
militarily exhausted and, more importantly, it activates the elements of
acculturation in (the superpower ies) of origin:
& # 8211; The dogma of atheism systems against the belief that believe in
the next life and God.
& # 8211; The love of the world, worldly pleasures and opulence compared to
people who had nothing to lose.
& # 8211; The moral corruption, the slightest manifestation of which was
the Russian soldiers and officers returned (home) & # 8212; if revenue & #
8212; and found that their wives had a child or a relationship with someone
else.
& # 8211; social inequities clearly floated to the surface when the
weakened economic situation because of the war. Then when money gets tight
and monetary crises begin, the great thieves appear, especially if accurate
accounting begins. [Text, p. 19]
second phase
The second phase of the ISIS strategy is to establish its own parallel
governance structure in areas it controls. What does it mean? It requires
firms and markets remain open, he set up Islamic courts and schools,
and "educates" the local population in the principles of Salafi Islam.
There are several years it has even started issuing its own currency and
passports.
Although these initiatives reached wide acceptance, the point was made: We,
the Islamic state, are an alternative to existing corrupt governments. We
can do better. Unfortunately, this pitch is not without its attractions in
areas that were decimated by years of sanctions, war and chaos.
third phase
The third phase of the ISIS program involves a review of how to expand the
radical message in other countries. The idea is that the bold, radical and
violent action by ISIS in the Middle East triggered franchises "benefits"
in other parts of the world. This idea is not as ridiculous as it sounds.
Like communist movements were attractive at some point in many parts of the
Third World, for other forms of radicalism are now available to fill the
void once occupied by communist insurgencies. These are some of the factors
to consider in choosing the country "" to the insurgency:
Factors taken into consideration when selecting the countries:
Regarding the common bonds between states where regions of savagery may
INTO BEING, we notice that some or all of the factors (below) concern:
& # 8211; The presence of geographic depth and topography allowed in each
separate state, the establishment of the regions which are managed by the
system of administration of savagery.
& # 8211; The weakness of the regime in power and the weakness of the
centralization of power in the peripheries of the borders of his state and
sometimes in internal areas, especially those that are overloaded.
& # 8211; The presence of jihadist, Islamic expansion spreads in these
regions.
& # 8211; The nature of the people in these regions. This is a matter in
which God has given preference to one place to another.
& # 8211; Similarly, the distribution of weapons by people who are in these
areas. [Text, p. 38]
Overall, there is a coherent program here in many religious cant
environment. It is organized, logical, and was implemented fanatically
where its members have been able to do so. Some international powers
believe that they can use ISIS on a basis for others as a kind of battering
ram to break down the secular regimes they do not like (eg, Syria). Those
who believe that they are deluding themselves. ISIS can be rented, but
never owned; and once he is finished taking the money with one hand, he
quickly devour the same hand. Never forget.
Read more: Is Destroying Pope Francis The Catholic Church?
You must be willing to die for the Fourth Amendment
We live in the digital era mass surveillance. This should not surprise any
of red readers here pilled return royalty. Edward Snowden revelations about
the National Security Agency metadata collection program cameras in every
corner, it is very easy to lose sight of what is really important in this
national debate: all arguments, debates and discussions boil down to one
question:
Are you ready to die for the Fourth Amendment to the United States
Constitution?
The citizens' right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the
persons or things to be seized.
The Fourth Amendment has been interpreted as a right to privacy, and has
its origins in English law while there were some places that the king could
not go. A man of the house is his castle as was found in the English legal
texts from the 17th century.
In this era of the threat of terrorism, certain liberties are under siege
by many well-meaning individuals and policy makers. Many (if not most) have
general-laudable goal to prevent people from dying in terrorist attacks.
Some (probably a minority) support mass surveillance to other dishonorable
means. I respect the people who are really well-meaning, even if they are
wrong.
They are wrong because the Fourth Amendment is very important, and worth
risking our lives for. Sacrificing the Fourth Amendment on the altar of
saving our lives is the wrong choice: Benjamin Franklin said it perfectly
when he said, Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve
neither.
South Park, and Great River Hypocrisy
Americans, since their inception in 1775, have always made statements about
their high duties. However, making noble statements is easy: the defense of
these rights is difficult, and the men could die. Although I am well known
for my theoretical support for Britain in the American Revolution (were I
alive in 1775), I have the greatest respect for the founding fathers who
not only have high returns on individual rights, but also were willing to
sacrifice their lives to protect / preserve. I have little to no respect
for any man who claims to believe in something, but retreats like a coward
when faced with adversity in defending those beliefs.
There was a controversy a few years ago about a South Park episode where an
image of Muhammad was to be shown. Although Trey Parker and Matt Stone
fought hard to have the Mohammed image included in the episode, Comedy
Central censored the image of evil outside animated Mohammed. In a
deliberate irony, Parker and Stone called cowardice Comedy Central in the
same episode: The character Stephen Stoch (Butter father) gives South Park
soliloquy about the difference between believing in something and just give
lip service.
For those who watch South Park Butter's father had the unusual role of
giving the episode a political message s.
In short, if you are willing to risk death for you and your children in a
terrorist attack to preserve the Fourth Amendment, I will praise you as an
individual intellectually honest who really believes in the concept of
privacy. I do it in a way similar to how Roosh respects all people at risk
of humiliation and really trying to have sex with attractive women.
But if you support the dismantling of the National Security Agency's
program metadata, but reinstate if your life or the lives of your children
were at stake so I brand you a coward and a hypocrite. Support genuine
civil liberties (not in the way SJW s think about them) is difficult:
standing up for your rights can get you killed. Horribly. In a hail of
rusty nails and ball bearings.
Not worth dying for nothing?
In 1964, a man named Ronald Reagan gave a speech at the Republican National
Convention entitled a time to choose & # 8221. Aptly named, the future
President Reagan would place the following to the American people:
If nothing in life is worth dying for, when is it started & # 8212; right
in front of the enemy (Communism)? Or should Moses have told the children
of Israel to live in slavery under the Pharaohs? Christ have refused the
cross? If the Patriots in Concord Bridge have thrown their guns and refused
to fire the shot heard round the world? The martyrs of history were not
fools, and our honor dead gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis
didn t die in vain.
As a people, Americans must decide it would be better to die on their feet
as free men whose rights are not violated privacy than live like slaves
whose lives have been exposed to government . In the words of Reagan, the
martyrs of history are not crazy. We have everything to lose when we let
fear of physical violence to convince him to give us our rights. During the
Cold War, it was obvious to the West as tens of millions starving to death
or sent to Mao survival courses in Siberia during the Soviet Union.
What this means for us today
We must not let the threat or fear of violence silent truth. Ann Coulter
and Milo Yiannopolis were wrong to cancel their appearances speaking at
Berkeley under the threat of violence Antifa and other organizations. SJW I
guess both Ann and Milo support the right to freedom of expression if they
are really dedicated, I would put them to whom they should get up on the
podium, even if they know for sure that a terrorist left will shoot them.
As we silence our voices to avoid violence SJW s is the time that we give
up our moral authority: the red pill we are brave warriors, and SJW s loose.
Neither would have fallen face SJW violence.
Date with destiny
Last month, I took a vacation to Hawaii when I was between jobs. While
enjoying the free alcohol served in first class, I had the opportunity to
really think about the issue of privacy and it was really worth risking
one's life. I realized that if I am ready to die for the fourth amendment,
I can not support the NSA same metadata program with the best intentions
(to save lives).
When a sudden jolt of fear struck me at the prospect of being torn by a
suicide bomber, I remembered that I had felt the same fear before: in Iraq
and Afghanistan while serving in the army US. As undesirable as the
prospect is, to this day, I am always ready to risk death or serious
mutilation in the name of the rights listed in the Constitution as it was
originally written and intended, not the perversions of the suite supreme
Courts (slavery apart).
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is
more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature & #
8230; -John Stuart Mill
Edward Snowden is no hero: hero Don t run off to nations even more
tyrannical than they are ostensibly protesting. Still, I am glad that the
information about a leak of the NSA's metadata program and he was right to
do so. We, the red men pilled, must decide that our freedom is more
important than our lives, and that there are greater things than our desire
to continue living, banging beautiful women and improve. We have to fight
like hell to destroy those who wish us harm, we must secure our borders
(which would reduce the chances of having to risk our lives in the name of
the fourth amendment), but above all we must stay intellectually coherent
with our beliefs and summon the courage to stand up for them in the face of
danger.
Learn more: The Power of Awareness, "Snowden" Oliver Stone
of red readers here pilled return royalty. Edward Snowden revelations about
the National Security Agency metadata collection program cameras in every
corner, it is very easy to lose sight of what is really important in this
national debate: all arguments, debates and discussions boil down to one
question:
Are you ready to die for the Fourth Amendment to the United States
Constitution?
The citizens' right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the
persons or things to be seized.
The Fourth Amendment has been interpreted as a right to privacy, and has
its origins in English law while there were some places that the king could
not go. A man of the house is his castle as was found in the English legal
texts from the 17th century.
In this era of the threat of terrorism, certain liberties are under siege
by many well-meaning individuals and policy makers. Many (if not most) have
general-laudable goal to prevent people from dying in terrorist attacks.
Some (probably a minority) support mass surveillance to other dishonorable
means. I respect the people who are really well-meaning, even if they are
wrong.
They are wrong because the Fourth Amendment is very important, and worth
risking our lives for. Sacrificing the Fourth Amendment on the altar of
saving our lives is the wrong choice: Benjamin Franklin said it perfectly
when he said, Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve
neither.
South Park, and Great River Hypocrisy
Americans, since their inception in 1775, have always made statements about
their high duties. However, making noble statements is easy: the defense of
these rights is difficult, and the men could die. Although I am well known
for my theoretical support for Britain in the American Revolution (were I
alive in 1775), I have the greatest respect for the founding fathers who
not only have high returns on individual rights, but also were willing to
sacrifice their lives to protect / preserve. I have little to no respect
for any man who claims to believe in something, but retreats like a coward
when faced with adversity in defending those beliefs.
There was a controversy a few years ago about a South Park episode where an
image of Muhammad was to be shown. Although Trey Parker and Matt Stone
fought hard to have the Mohammed image included in the episode, Comedy
Central censored the image of evil outside animated Mohammed. In a
deliberate irony, Parker and Stone called cowardice Comedy Central in the
same episode: The character Stephen Stoch (Butter father) gives South Park
soliloquy about the difference between believing in something and just give
lip service.
For those who watch South Park Butter's father had the unusual role of
giving the episode a political message s.
In short, if you are willing to risk death for you and your children in a
terrorist attack to preserve the Fourth Amendment, I will praise you as an
individual intellectually honest who really believes in the concept of
privacy. I do it in a way similar to how Roosh respects all people at risk
of humiliation and really trying to have sex with attractive women.
But if you support the dismantling of the National Security Agency's
program metadata, but reinstate if your life or the lives of your children
were at stake so I brand you a coward and a hypocrite. Support genuine
civil liberties (not in the way SJW s think about them) is difficult:
standing up for your rights can get you killed. Horribly. In a hail of
rusty nails and ball bearings.
Not worth dying for nothing?
In 1964, a man named Ronald Reagan gave a speech at the Republican National
Convention entitled a time to choose & # 8221. Aptly named, the future
President Reagan would place the following to the American people:
If nothing in life is worth dying for, when is it started & # 8212; right
in front of the enemy (Communism)? Or should Moses have told the children
of Israel to live in slavery under the Pharaohs? Christ have refused the
cross? If the Patriots in Concord Bridge have thrown their guns and refused
to fire the shot heard round the world? The martyrs of history were not
fools, and our honor dead gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis
didn t die in vain.
As a people, Americans must decide it would be better to die on their feet
as free men whose rights are not violated privacy than live like slaves
whose lives have been exposed to government . In the words of Reagan, the
martyrs of history are not crazy. We have everything to lose when we let
fear of physical violence to convince him to give us our rights. During the
Cold War, it was obvious to the West as tens of millions starving to death
or sent to Mao survival courses in Siberia during the Soviet Union.
What this means for us today
We must not let the threat or fear of violence silent truth. Ann Coulter
and Milo Yiannopolis were wrong to cancel their appearances speaking at
Berkeley under the threat of violence Antifa and other organizations. SJW I
guess both Ann and Milo support the right to freedom of expression if they
are really dedicated, I would put them to whom they should get up on the
podium, even if they know for sure that a terrorist left will shoot them.
As we silence our voices to avoid violence SJW s is the time that we give
up our moral authority: the red pill we are brave warriors, and SJW s loose.
Neither would have fallen face SJW violence.
Date with destiny
Last month, I took a vacation to Hawaii when I was between jobs. While
enjoying the free alcohol served in first class, I had the opportunity to
really think about the issue of privacy and it was really worth risking
one's life. I realized that if I am ready to die for the fourth amendment,
I can not support the NSA same metadata program with the best intentions
(to save lives).
When a sudden jolt of fear struck me at the prospect of being torn by a
suicide bomber, I remembered that I had felt the same fear before: in Iraq
and Afghanistan while serving in the army US. As undesirable as the
prospect is, to this day, I am always ready to risk death or serious
mutilation in the name of the rights listed in the Constitution as it was
originally written and intended, not the perversions of the suite supreme
Courts (slavery apart).
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is
more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature & #
8230; -John Stuart Mill
Edward Snowden is no hero: hero Don t run off to nations even more
tyrannical than they are ostensibly protesting. Still, I am glad that the
information about a leak of the NSA's metadata program and he was right to
do so. We, the red men pilled, must decide that our freedom is more
important than our lives, and that there are greater things than our desire
to continue living, banging beautiful women and improve. We have to fight
like hell to destroy those who wish us harm, we must secure our borders
(which would reduce the chances of having to risk our lives in the name of
the fourth amendment), but above all we must stay intellectually coherent
with our beliefs and summon the courage to stand up for them in the face of
danger.
Learn more: The Power of Awareness, "Snowden" Oliver Stone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)