The soldiers of the Ottoman Empire were sent Sept. 11, 1565 in what became
known as "The Great Siege of Malta". They were humiliated and forced to
withdraw from what was supposed to be an epic campaign of conquest for the
greater glory of Allah, the Compassionate. Is it a coincidence that Islamic
terrorists have chosen the same date to destroy the Twin Towers in New York?
Let's start from the beginning. The Knights of St. John, or Hospitallier
knights were originally a religious order founded in the 12th century in
the Holy Land. Their mission was to care for pilgrims who entered the Holy
Land, and defend against any threat to the perilous road to Jerusalem. They
were religious as well as military, created under a papal charter, which
means they have responded to anyone but the pope.
Fast forward four centuries. The Knights always lead an endless struggle
against the forces of Islam. The Crusades were ancient history. People had
all but forgotten. The Knights of St. John were regarded as outdated relics
of a bygone era. Other levels of crusaders, like the Templars, had been
missing for over two centuries.
The Knights of St. John were forced to leave their fortress in Rhodes in
1522, and for some time homeless, until they claimed the island of Malta,
which was given to them by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, grand-son
Fernando of Aragon (the model for Machiavelli a rule in "the Prince").
Fernando had expelled the Moors from Spain after eight centuries of
invasion, and Charles V himself led a constant struggle against the
crescent and star.
The Grand Master of the Order of St John, Jean Parisot de la Valette, 71 at
the time. He had a personal interest against Muslims, having been a knight
since he was 18 years old, participating in battles against Islam
throughout his life. His family had served in five different Crusades, with
distinction, and he was raised with stories of their epic bravery. He had
been defeated and expelled from Rhodes years earlier, and had even been a
convict to Muslims for a year, rowing up to 20 hours a day, before escaping
and vowing revenge.
The Knights survived by raiding the trade routes of the Ottoman navy and
basically make life impossible for the Turks. Knights were hardened
warriors, great sailors, and the godly. Most of them were the 2nd or 3rd
son of the aristocracy, refined nobility without inheritance. They were
considered the most formidable fighting force in Europe, and were indeed
elite in every sense.
Suleiman Desire
Since its founding in the 7th century, Islam had wanted an achievement:
invade Europe. These primitive, barbaric desert remains had spent most of
their history killing each other until Mohammed united them against a
common enemy of Western civilization.
The Turkish leader, Suleiman "the Magnificent" was the most powerful man
alive. His empire was ridiculously large, from Vienna to Babylon all the
way to Aden, in the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula. His titles
included vice-regent of God on earth, the Lord of the East and West Lords,
and even neck Possessor of men, for he beheaded nearly all who displeased
him. But alas, such a rule is not enough. He had set his sights on Europe,
and there was no force on earth powerful enough to stop it. Or so he
thought ...
The Knights of St. John had been a thorn in his side long enough. They were
massively effective for disabling the Turkish operations of their new home
in Malta, attacked Ottoman ships at sea. These Western pirates were led by
the intrepid Romegas, a legendary knight who joined the order at age 15,
and close friend of Valletta. Romegas was considered one of the greatest
sailors of his time. He took much booty and several prisoners of high rank
on his raids on the sea and Suleiman enough. He decided to crush the Order
of the Knights, once and for all.
Assemble a massive army of 48,000 men aboard 200 ships, including the
elite, scimitar wielding janissaries called "Invincible" and layalars
junkies who wore the skins of wild beasts in combat. Their only concern in
life was to kill Christians and die a glorious death to be able to enter
heaven and enjoy 72 virgins promised by their prophet.
Who was their opposition? A simple force of 700 knights, who watched over a
small barren island. Certainly they were no match for the vice-reactive of
God on Earth. In March 1565, the planned Muslim fleet, determined to
destroy the Western world and subjugate Europe under the heel of Islam
forever.
Alone and surrounded
Surely enough, the intelligence of Valletta he warned against the impending
Apocalypse, sailing quickly directly to him and his brave knights. He sent
messengers to all European kings, asking for help against the darkness
ahead. No answer except one: Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire. A bulwark
against Islam legendary Charles promised assistance if they could hold out
long enough. For now, it seemed, were the knights themselves.
The island of Malta were three main strongholds: The fortress of St.
Angelo, St. Michael and newly built St Elmo, on the peninsula of Mount
Sciberras. Both of them were solid structures, and even if they are nothing
compared to their original fortifications on the island of Rhodes, they
would have to do. Valletta has designed a strategy for better defense they
could, but the situation was quite dark knights.
Malta's fortifications
There were 700 knights defending the island, and about 8000 Maltese
soldiers. Valletta has vowed that there would be no retreat, no surrender.
They met in a final prayer and prepares to attack. It is said that after
the prayer, any weakness disappeared from their heart, and small
animosities them were dissolved. The power of faith has made its presence
felt.
Valletta, himself a man of deep faith, reportedly said:
It is the great battle of the Cross and the Qur'an is now fighting. A
formidable army of infidels are about to invade our island. We, for our
part, we are the chosen soldiers of the Cross, and if Heaven requires the
sacrifice of our lives, there is no better opportunity than this.
He knew it was not a fight he would win with brute force, if necessary.
Cunning, faith and courage to be its survival tools.
The Onslaught begins
The first attack by the Ottomans was St Elmo. artillery fire and relentless
waves of aggression against the Ottomans rained down on defenders. At 100
knights and 500 soldiers held the fort. They were ordered to fight to the
last man. The Turks were convinced that they could take the fort in three
days. Yet after weeks, the defenders were still struggling on.
The defenders were quite ingenious, and developed all kinds of incendiary
devices. They developed a primitive hand grenade made of a clay pot filled
with the famous Greek fire, a napalm-like substance. They threw these into
their opponents with devastating effects: the shrapnel would explode and
damage enemies by the dozen.
Knights invented large hoops of fire, wooden rings wrapped in layers of
flammable materials, such as brandy, turpentine, gunpowder, and the fabric,
they are ignited and be rolled downhill toward the Turks hundreds.
They also invented the Trump, a long hollow tube filled with flammable
sulfur resin and linseed oil which, when lit, will breathe fire several
meters away for as long as half an hour. Knights use these primitives to
strategic flamethrower of choke points, which will hold any advances by
attackers. The Turks wore long robes, to be fired was quite devastating for
them.
After weeks of fighting and bombarded the defenders were malnourished,
deprived of sleep, and disfigured as to be unrecognizable. Many were
seriously injured, limping and bandaged in improvised tissue, but their
conviction is unwavering. They have received reinforcements and supplies
from the main fort of Sant'Angelo, with the message of their Grand Master
fight to the death.
To make matters worse, the arrival of Drajut, known among his people
as "the sword of Islam" and "the scourge of the Christians," invigorated
Turkish forces. He brought another 1500 his elite warriors. The bombardment
continued, and the Turks kept trying to charge into the castle. Soon, a
cannon burst Drajut injured. He was dragged out of his tent. The sword of
Islam had met his end. Morale in the Turkish army began to falter.
Furious, Mustapha Pasha, commander now ordered the fort surrounded by all
the Turkish fleet. The biggest of their guns were moved forward, and the
defenders were pounded relentlessly. This brought together, said their
prayers, and defiantly spelled the end of the chapel for a last time. Those
who could not bear sat on chairs, well armed, their souls to their Lord
Jesus commended.
The Turks flocked and finally defenders were defeated. They were all
massacred and Red Crescent Suleiman was set up the flag of the Knights of
St. John. But they trembled because across the bay was larger and much more
impressive St Angelo. It took them four weeks to invade the smaller
fortress, and had lost about 10,000 men.
Terror Tactics
Mustapha Pasha knew he had to break the spirit of the defenders, because he
had seen how their bodies could resist. So he ordered the knight commanders
died as beheaded. Their heads were put on pikes, and their decapitated
bodies were sailed in the bay to the remaining defenders, attached to the
top of the crude wooden cross, a mockery of their faith. Valletta responded
in kind. He ordered the Turkish prisoners beheaded, and pulled his head
through the window with their biggest cannon. The message was clear: no
retreat, no surrender.
The bombing began. There were relentlessly shelling the fortress, and the
south side attack. The Turks were determined to take this small piece of
land. Mustapha was master planned: while the Christians were busy defending
the south side, ten large ships with 1,000 elite Janissaries would assault
the northern end, but Valletta had prepared for this eventuality. He left
Knight Guiral battery with a 5-gun at the base of the fort. He could hardly
believe his eyes that the Turks sailed right into his trap.
A perfect beach, he ordered his men to open fire. Nine of the 10 boats were
destroyed, 800 Janissaries sunk in water on site. One ship left, and the
frightened look in their eyes sent fear into the heart of Muslims. The
defenders opened the door and loaded on, and overwhelmed the attackers who
ran for their lives. St Angelo survived another day.
Mustapha surrounded the fortress, and continued to bombard Christians. For
over a week, all Turkish cannons thundered on defensive positions. The
shelling could be heard from Sicily, over 20 miles (100 km) away, and the
people there were amazed that any man could survive such a hell.
The Turks renewed their attack and flocked from all sides. The victory
would be theirs in the end, it would seem. They breached the walls, but
ended up on a second layer of fortifications. Cannon fire rained on them,
and they were locked in a very effective death trap. After some time,
residents were jumping their defensive positions and forced the Turks to
retreat. Again, they were defeated.
Many times the attackers breached the walls, but they have always been met
effectively to these funneling slaughtering areas, with a wall of sharp
organized Pikes and fire musket eager to greet them. Valletta grabbed his
spear and led the charge several times to repel the attackers. Despite his
advanced age, he was a brave and skilled fighter. The sight of their main
leader of the attack, has inspired the Knights to hold the wave after wave
of Turkish attackers on several occasions when all hope seemed lost.
God's will
The death toll was catastrophic for the Muslims. The disease was endemic in
their ranks, the corpses of friends and rotten enemies all around them.
Their supplies were short, including gunpowder. Over 130,000 cannonballs
were fired Maltese defenders in total. The summer heat was burning and the
water on the island had been poisoned by residents before retreating. Their
morale was fading. Rumors spread the commander of the tent, soldiers
whisper It is certainly not Allah's will that we take this forsaken island
& # 8221.
They tried all kinds of tricks to destroy the defenders. They tried to dig
tunnels, but the Knights collapsed mines of their own, and sent soldiers to
repel the charge of the tunnel.
Then Mustapha prepared its siege tower, a huge juggernaut, larger than even
the ramparts of the fortress, to invade. But Valletta ordered his men to
remove the stone from the base of the walls, and shot the tower with huge
guns, containing two cannon balls held together by a chain. The strategy
was overwhelmingly effective and completely destroyed the tower. Supporters
cheered by seeing the Turks by jumping from the craft collapse, oil and
spitting fire on their own ranks.
Winter was coming, and victory seemed nowhere in sight for attackers.
Mustapha ordered his men to take the walled city of Mdina neighbor. His
army was approaching, but was greeted by heavily armed soldiers manning the
walls of cannons. "A second St Elmo !! "Shouted the soldiers, in their
retirement. But that was all a ploy, the governor, sensing the turn of
events, ordered civilians, women and children, to man the walls, clad in
armor and carrying pikes.
In another attempt to destroy the attackers, the Turkish forces gathered a
huge bomb, packed with gunpowder and shot, and rolled in the Christian
positions. The latter replied, rolling the diabolical device back at them,
causing a spectacular explosion. Hundreds died.
The Knights did not show much tolerance with the Muslim invaders,
Hello
Finally, after all hope of salvation was gone from the heart of the
defense, a relief force was in sight. More than 10 000 men in 28 ships had
arrived; soldiers from all over Europe, inspired by the courage of these
knights had joined the fight. Even then, they were heavily outnumbered by
the Turks. Mustapha ordered his men to load against the relief force, but
they have been severely weakened after months of fighting and endemic
disease.
In the Pit style Helm, the Christian relief force loaded in the heart of
the Turkish army, completely destroying the Turks. It was a bloodbath;
Muslims were massacred, hunted throughout the island and picked off. They
scrambled to get on board their ships and leave. It was a landslide victory.
Of the 48,000 invaders who first put the veil to terrorize Europe, only
10,000 have come home. Knights suffered heavy losses, too, but
miraculously, the victory was theirs. Their sacrifice was immense; the
Western world owes these men more than we'll never know. If not for them,
Europe would have been converted long ago, and we would most likely Arabic
(and sodomized a young age).
Knights looking ramparts that their enemies are crushed
Both Romegas and Valletta survived the fighting. After the siege, the
knights were hailed throughout Europe and the hailed as heroes. They had
heard stories of their legendary exploits, load the face of seemingly
insurmountable obstacles, and were inspired. Many donations were made
knights, and with them, the citadel was built Valetta, in honor of the
Grand Master La Valette. The pope sent his best engineers and the city was
planned and designed as a solid fortress before it's time to defend
Christianity against future attacks.
Their victory had a profound impact throughout Europe. The local princes
realized that the only way to defeat Islam was to stop the war between them
and unite against the common threat. This has resulted in a large fighting
force than seven years later, the Turks crushed again at Lepanto, ending
the superiority of the Ottoman sea forever. Romegas was once again in the
front line of this battle.
Romegas died a few years later in Rome, after a life long struggle against
Islam at every turn. Valletta was offered the position of cardinal, but he
refused. The sword was the only way he had known all his life. He led the
Malta reconstruction and died a peaceful death, only a few years later in
1568. But the tales of their heroic acts would last for centuries to come.
This would come to be known as the last epic encounter between Crusaders
and Knights of Islam.
Victory
Conclusion
There are lessons to be learned from these events. It is said that those
who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it. Valletta and his
knights were considered obsolete fossil useless by their contemporaries.
Many people have met the Knights of St. John, but most made fun of their
traditions and way of life to the old.
But the Knights knew in their heart the truth. They did not let public
opinion sway their beliefs. They did not follow the rest of the civilized
world in the descent to ignorance, decadence and madness forgetting what it
is that makes us great. Their faith and their traditions were sacred to
them. They kept watch in silence for years, until fate has finally called.
I invite you, the reader colleagues to do the same. Forget political
correctness and opinions of the masses. Search your heart to the truth.
Meditate, you isolate is offline madness of the modern world. Take some
time for yourself, get in touch with nature, and in turn, your own nature.
Then you begin to see the truth. In the silence of your mind, you will find
the answers.
It took only 700 of these knights to save Europe. Now, Europe is
threatened, this time from the inside as well as foreign invaders. Maybe
there will be awake enough, pilled red souls to stem the barbarian invasion.
Let us prepare ourselves and we are strengthening. Maybe destiny call us
for the journey of a hero. Meanwhile, we'll see what we can do to preserve
our ancestral lands and traditions. Do not let the sacrifice of the brave
Malta to be in vain. Strong men are needed now more than ever.
Read more: Clash Of Steel and Wills: The story of the Battle of Lepanto
Saturday, September 30, 2017
Friday, September 29, 2017
7 books on the power of influence published after the 19th century
Last week, I discussed several books of ancient and modern times on power.
For power is a part of life, something that permeates our choices, our
actions, our judgments, down from the opening we choose among several to
get this particular girl looking up from her smartphone choices career that
could set the mark for the next ten years.
Some left saying "nothing is neutral," because it is all about power. Such
a sweeping statement is grossly exaggerated and reflects an unhealthy
worship of power, it still contains a kernel of truth. Knowing where your
power begins where a rule of legitimate power, and where you can take and
how, is far from clear, and can not be discovered by experience and a long
reflection.
ancient thought is usually wider, fuller, thicker than its modern
counterpart. It seems less like a lecture and more as a support for
meditation. For this reason, if you want to gain wisdom, I urge you to
start with Plato or Aristotle. However, these are not enough. Since these
eminent philosophers pondered the times have changed and we are faced with
challenges of antiquity men did not know & # 8212; or much less. Today, an
important part of what we struggle with is related to money and cultural
conflicts. These aspects are more directly addresses the contemporary books.
As you will see, pioneers in these areas were barely friends. Among these
works, only two out of seven were written by people who could be considered
more or less on our side, with serious doubts stain one of them. If we want
to beat the hollow Empire on its own ground, meeting with his most cunning
agents is necessary, whatever the bitterness of the experience. It is not
as if they had produced the first bittersweet books after all.
Public Opinion 1. Walter Lippmann
"I'm Chesterton without the mustache and the foreskin. Now listen (((me)))
on the way people live misthink ".
Parked in the wake of the Great War by a Jewish journalist, public opinion
says a lot about the "manufacture of consent" before the infamous Noam
Chomsky was born. You know what you are when you crack open the book and
meeting with a quote from the allegory of Plato's cave in full early. To
recall, the allegory of the cave represents the clueless people whose
prospects are limited by blinders and are led to confuse the puppet shadows
with real things.
Public opinion makes a clear distinction between the two types of
individuals: first, the "elite", the "expert", the "specialist" who has
been trained and knows; On the other hand, the ordinary citizen, that is
riddled with bias and prejudice and is part of a "disoriented flock" in
need of direction. The public, mostly in the form of press day after day,
is how the old guides it & # 8212; for his own good, of course. (In a book
on, The Phantom Public, Lippmann double down and draws an even more
scathing picture of the average public Gentile.)
In criticizing the "unregulated" media and how people, when faced with
incomplete or uncertain information are based on assumptions, Lippmann
explains how to manipulate people and justified. It distinguishes between
a "real" world and "pseudo-environment" because of alleged prejudice,
superstition, stereotypes, myths and & # 8212, you may have guessed it & #
8212; social constructs. The cool part, from the perspective of Lippmann,
is that 1) most stupid goyim can not tell the difference between truth
and "social construction", and 2) the pseudo-environment can be
deconstructed, reconstructed and manipulated by those who know it exists
and how to change it.
If you want to trace the roots of false news media on us looming today,
public opinion is playing, provided that you can wear with arrogant remarks
Lippmann on the "boobies" or on the way to be dissected the girl next to a
psychiatrist. By the way, you may notice that hyper-up stuff like the work
of Daniel Kahneman on "through the people" can easily be called in support
of a Lippmannian program.
2. Edward Bernays Propaganda
A nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays would be advertising and discrete
marketing campaigns that Lippman was journalism. Bernays is indeed a
pioneer in the occult influence, indirect advertising, clever use of
symbolism, spinning and other practices that mark under the euphemistic
term "public relations".
Propaganda, the most famous book Bernays says some of these methods, as
well as successful uses, it is done. For example, in 1915, he promoted a
Russian troupe of ballet dancers promoting their colorful costumes in
fashion, pushing opinion articles on dance, and causing American men (troll
bait "are American men ashamed to be gracious? ").
Bernays is best known for his campaign "freedom torch". To expand the
market for cigarettes, he teamed with a psychoanalyst, (((Abraham Brill))),
and corrupt journalists, and together they spun pseudo-spontaneous events
by young women who smoke in public together . roughly Looks like Soros
Femens. More money for tobacco magnates, plus the ability to turn a story
of "progress" for leftists, less moral for everyone.
Bernays also helped President Woodrow Wilson betray his first campaign
promise, namely that the United States will join the Great War, but managed
to have another propagandist, George Creel, scapegoats in his place during
this campaign was exposed as full of lies.
Play propaganda, note how Bernays attempts to justify and regulate & #
8212; # 8212 in words and his own practice. In a democracy, it is necessary
that "our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely
by men we have never heard of. "Well, maybe free speech for everyone
encourages an arms race on the marketplace ideas, but conveniently forgets
Bernays (((that))) began self-promotion and play tough competition at a
time when it was considered trespassing on the territory of someone else.
3. Ayn Rand Atlas Shrugged
Just need an introduction to the American reader, Atlas Shrugged can be
understood as a philosophical tale about the personal and social power. Far
from being the greedy bastards, they are sometimes portrayed as Hank
Rearden, Francesco d'Anconia, Midas Mulligan et al. are heroic characters
with an own code of ethics and sense of integrity. Full of masculine
energy, they follow their calling, are self-controlled and a strong will to
develop the capacities that enable them to thrive and contribute to the
welfare of society. All are virtuous and some, like d'Anconia, are curious
or playful.
Closely woven with the main adventures of the characters is a real sense of
authenticity. Hank Rearden could earn even more money it already
associating with the corrupt government, but it does not. Midas Mulligan
could continue to invest smartly as he does, but he'd rather scuttle his
own empire that bow down to an unfair trial. John Galt could live in a
house he patented his engine as Tesla, but he spent years in a small
apartment, posing as a humble railway worker, so he and others many
successful spirit setting a crazy world turned.
Atlas Shrugged is based on a sharp distinction between external goods, such
as money and social status and internal elements such as integrity and
values. John Galt teaches all of its targets to abandon the old, no matter
the suffering involved, so they can keep it. Only those who have betrayed
their own moral sense to a place within the system, as a former professor
of Galt Robert Stadler, or those who seem like they have never had, will
affirm that integrity is but a social construction or that nobody should be
truly independent. The Representation of Ayn Rand litterateurs like a bunch
of assholes neurotic willing to take what they could never create is
hilarious and, although sometimes simplistic, remains essentially the truth.
Of course, Atlas Shrugged should be read with a huge grain of salt.
Objectivism has no objection against feminism, contempt lots of family and
race, and of course encourages robber barons to do anything they want. Even
then, the main work of Ayn Rand remains infused with a positive sense of
life and a meaningful analysis of major power relations.
4. Rules for Radicals Saul Alinsky
After books about journalism and advertising are the most notorious ever
written about politics. An agitator and demagogue since the late 1930s,
Saul Alinsky had over thirty years of experience when it published the
Rules for Radicals. This book was covered twice ROK, so I will not comment
on briefly.
While elitist prose of lengthy Lippman philosophical atmosphere that makes
it look like a dead ringer for James Burnham, and while the book Bernays
this "board 40%, 40 stories%, 20% bullshit" brand typical of the personal
business of improving things, Alinsky writes clearly put the reader on a
particular track. A master practitioner of pilpul, he manages to mix a
force-position is right near Ragnar Barberousse is with Marxist tone
blandly. If you can endure the pounding-leftism of his prose, the rules for
radicals explains many strategies while organizing or agitator may be used
in special circumstances.
Stir grievances, focusing on insignificant events or unimportant but makes
important taboos, to lobby key people, rattling a compromise by a war of
attrition before abusing her, making a public target "pregnant with hope"
in you by intimating another public so that it remains of the road are all
strategies Alinsky explained.
Rules for Radicals gives an insider view to the complex workings of the
left, which still applies many of these strategies today. A reader of our
side can also pick up some tips, especially since Alinsky was an outsider
to the areas of the property that contributes to lay off, as we are now.
Reading this I started to think about how the left is trying to prevent us
to imitate. Our attempts to organize & # 8212; & # 8212 legally, are still
frantically despised and repressed. Another example is how they managed to
create an aura "rebel brave" around their characters who faced repression
as each individual pilled red rising is reduced to a common denominator and
defamed. Obviously, the lukewarm conservative Alinsky face are nothing
compared to the implementation we face. I guess it will be our victory all
the more commendable.
5. maneuvered Esther Vilar Man
Esther Vilar in 1975
Published in 1972, just one year after the rules Alinsky, maneuvered Man
Vilar is quite different in all respects except maybe the subject.
Originally written in German, written by an author gentile, man maneuvered
comes from a woman who fell ill with how gender plays the oppressed,
fragile, need help to extract a free service of other, namely men.
Like judeocritical Jews are often the best critics of their own background
& # 8212; think about Gilad Atzmon and Paul Gottfried & # 8212; the rare
breed of women who are too honest and good humor to go along with the
position manipulative peers provide valuable information. Vilar was red
pill, manosphere-friendly before the word was invented.
In a clear style, it exposes the true character of feminist (aggressive,
power-hungry, always projecting their own character to the other, blame
everyone but themselves for their own misery), the daily operation of
approach men plagued with anxiety, and how the hardest sex work becomes
increasingly fragile and forced to passive obedience while women "stress"
without becoming a driving force in politics.
In one shot, Vilar removes gallant sails, white-knightism and hammering the
story of both adversarial and more moderate feminists women. The man is
operated as relevant today as in the 70s It also gives a nice guys context
the key to our generation were raised in & # 8212; a context that has
nothing to do with patriarchy.
In many ways, the man maneuvered as Herrnstein and Murray The Bell Curve:
he sold a lot, but only "behind closed doors" are perpetrators receive
support, and from the start they face defamation of muscular media and
death threats.
48 laws of 6. Robert Greene
Having acquired a personal experience of the power dynamics working in
Hollywood, Greene used his passion for history and writing talent to create
the 48 laws of power. The result was a bestseller. Honestly, its success
was deserved.
"Laws" of Greene are general rules more or less in many power relations.
Some of the rules still apply, some are related to the context, all help to
assess a particular situation and know what is happening. The 48 laws have
a very nice layout, telling stories about an optimistic tone, and interpret
both elegant and deeply. As this book has become a classic, with countless
citing sources, I suggest you get a copy if you have used cheap not open
already cracked.
7. Ryan Holiday Trust Me, I'm lying
Note Holiday repressed haircut Alt-Righter
To end this list is a 2.0 version of Edward Bernays. A college dropout,
Ryan Holiday including (1) how the "big names" of mainstream Internet media
took their stories smaller bloggers, and (2) how to bribe bloggers. Believe
me, I lie explains how hilarious feminist triggered holidays for promoting
a shitty movie without even knowing why, or how he flattered and bribed
Instagramers women so that they would "free" advertising for American
Apparel . Gawker and Jezebel are exposed as unethical, scandal Search
points-disconnecting brain.
When it comes to justify the book, vacation, he said finally disgusted with
all the deception around and opted for spilling the beans. Beware of this
type of display. Many offenders are trying to transform their bad
reputation upside claiming loudly that they moved to a road to Damascus.
Nevertheless, it is quite possible that vacation became really unhappy
because he is not Jewish.
It represents (Chapter 14) Andrew Breitbart as a "media manipulator" who
never tired or morally disturbed by what he did. Perhaps at least some
non-Jews can not imitate the "chosen people" all the way down without
feeling like they betray to the bone.
Believe me, I lay suffering from a liberal bias in the choice of some of
its examples. Mention Breitbart, holiday essentially accuses "Republicans
angry" sore SJWs are doing, and shows sympathy for blacks promoted
undeserved as he does not show for targeted SJW dissidents. It also becomes
repetitive after a while. Yet it is a very good book for a
twenty-something, and it can be considered an applied version of the craft
Bernays.
Conclusion
Power over oneself and social power are two different things. Someone can
quietly enjoy the old and live a good happy life without much of a second,
while someone who enjoys much of the second type of power can bring ruin to
himself and other acting as a whiner right. In any case, today the social
power too easily into something disgusting. For often must design an image,
a public appearance itself is deceptive background.
Be honest with Normie, indoctrinated masses, or crooks that awaits us is
like casting pearls before swine. Understanding leftism, or system, or
women, and see beyond the new endless facades is liberating. But the fact
that we sometimes act so Machiavellian feels disturbing. And yet we have no
choice & # 8212; game is about that, and the masses should be said
with "pedagogy", namely a cunning manner, be oriented in the right
direction. Andrew Breitbart Breitbart had to be in the red pill a much
wider audience than Vdare or ROK.
For more social power, we must be creative and flexible, coming unexpected.
Never compromise, however, on fundamentals. Ayn Rand had it right and
Julius Evola did too. Taking this formulation, the role, the cause, and so
on does not necessarily mean a profound agreement with her. As might say
many cases, "it's not that simple. "And even then, I'm a pain in the
stomach when playing rules Alinsky, and again later, when I went through
vacation to paint hypocritically as a liberal truth teller & # 8212 This
which seems rather ridiculous considering that the title of his book.
Apart from Atlas Shrugged, all the books mentioned here are acidic to some
extent, and remains perhaps much more in them could be considered a
Katabasis after which the sacred texts appear only more illuminating and
refreshing.
Read more: The Idiots are useful Proles a bicentennial map Elite?
For power is a part of life, something that permeates our choices, our
actions, our judgments, down from the opening we choose among several to
get this particular girl looking up from her smartphone choices career that
could set the mark for the next ten years.
Some left saying "nothing is neutral," because it is all about power. Such
a sweeping statement is grossly exaggerated and reflects an unhealthy
worship of power, it still contains a kernel of truth. Knowing where your
power begins where a rule of legitimate power, and where you can take and
how, is far from clear, and can not be discovered by experience and a long
reflection.
ancient thought is usually wider, fuller, thicker than its modern
counterpart. It seems less like a lecture and more as a support for
meditation. For this reason, if you want to gain wisdom, I urge you to
start with Plato or Aristotle. However, these are not enough. Since these
eminent philosophers pondered the times have changed and we are faced with
challenges of antiquity men did not know & # 8212; or much less. Today, an
important part of what we struggle with is related to money and cultural
conflicts. These aspects are more directly addresses the contemporary books.
As you will see, pioneers in these areas were barely friends. Among these
works, only two out of seven were written by people who could be considered
more or less on our side, with serious doubts stain one of them. If we want
to beat the hollow Empire on its own ground, meeting with his most cunning
agents is necessary, whatever the bitterness of the experience. It is not
as if they had produced the first bittersweet books after all.
Public Opinion 1. Walter Lippmann
"I'm Chesterton without the mustache and the foreskin. Now listen (((me)))
on the way people live misthink ".
Parked in the wake of the Great War by a Jewish journalist, public opinion
says a lot about the "manufacture of consent" before the infamous Noam
Chomsky was born. You know what you are when you crack open the book and
meeting with a quote from the allegory of Plato's cave in full early. To
recall, the allegory of the cave represents the clueless people whose
prospects are limited by blinders and are led to confuse the puppet shadows
with real things.
Public opinion makes a clear distinction between the two types of
individuals: first, the "elite", the "expert", the "specialist" who has
been trained and knows; On the other hand, the ordinary citizen, that is
riddled with bias and prejudice and is part of a "disoriented flock" in
need of direction. The public, mostly in the form of press day after day,
is how the old guides it & # 8212; for his own good, of course. (In a book
on, The Phantom Public, Lippmann double down and draws an even more
scathing picture of the average public Gentile.)
In criticizing the "unregulated" media and how people, when faced with
incomplete or uncertain information are based on assumptions, Lippmann
explains how to manipulate people and justified. It distinguishes between
a "real" world and "pseudo-environment" because of alleged prejudice,
superstition, stereotypes, myths and & # 8212, you may have guessed it & #
8212; social constructs. The cool part, from the perspective of Lippmann,
is that 1) most stupid goyim can not tell the difference between truth
and "social construction", and 2) the pseudo-environment can be
deconstructed, reconstructed and manipulated by those who know it exists
and how to change it.
If you want to trace the roots of false news media on us looming today,
public opinion is playing, provided that you can wear with arrogant remarks
Lippmann on the "boobies" or on the way to be dissected the girl next to a
psychiatrist. By the way, you may notice that hyper-up stuff like the work
of Daniel Kahneman on "through the people" can easily be called in support
of a Lippmannian program.
2. Edward Bernays Propaganda
A nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays would be advertising and discrete
marketing campaigns that Lippman was journalism. Bernays is indeed a
pioneer in the occult influence, indirect advertising, clever use of
symbolism, spinning and other practices that mark under the euphemistic
term "public relations".
Propaganda, the most famous book Bernays says some of these methods, as
well as successful uses, it is done. For example, in 1915, he promoted a
Russian troupe of ballet dancers promoting their colorful costumes in
fashion, pushing opinion articles on dance, and causing American men (troll
bait "are American men ashamed to be gracious? ").
Bernays is best known for his campaign "freedom torch". To expand the
market for cigarettes, he teamed with a psychoanalyst, (((Abraham Brill))),
and corrupt journalists, and together they spun pseudo-spontaneous events
by young women who smoke in public together . roughly Looks like Soros
Femens. More money for tobacco magnates, plus the ability to turn a story
of "progress" for leftists, less moral for everyone.
Bernays also helped President Woodrow Wilson betray his first campaign
promise, namely that the United States will join the Great War, but managed
to have another propagandist, George Creel, scapegoats in his place during
this campaign was exposed as full of lies.
Play propaganda, note how Bernays attempts to justify and regulate & #
8212; # 8212 in words and his own practice. In a democracy, it is necessary
that "our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely
by men we have never heard of. "Well, maybe free speech for everyone
encourages an arms race on the marketplace ideas, but conveniently forgets
Bernays (((that))) began self-promotion and play tough competition at a
time when it was considered trespassing on the territory of someone else.
3. Ayn Rand Atlas Shrugged
Just need an introduction to the American reader, Atlas Shrugged can be
understood as a philosophical tale about the personal and social power. Far
from being the greedy bastards, they are sometimes portrayed as Hank
Rearden, Francesco d'Anconia, Midas Mulligan et al. are heroic characters
with an own code of ethics and sense of integrity. Full of masculine
energy, they follow their calling, are self-controlled and a strong will to
develop the capacities that enable them to thrive and contribute to the
welfare of society. All are virtuous and some, like d'Anconia, are curious
or playful.
Closely woven with the main adventures of the characters is a real sense of
authenticity. Hank Rearden could earn even more money it already
associating with the corrupt government, but it does not. Midas Mulligan
could continue to invest smartly as he does, but he'd rather scuttle his
own empire that bow down to an unfair trial. John Galt could live in a
house he patented his engine as Tesla, but he spent years in a small
apartment, posing as a humble railway worker, so he and others many
successful spirit setting a crazy world turned.
Atlas Shrugged is based on a sharp distinction between external goods, such
as money and social status and internal elements such as integrity and
values. John Galt teaches all of its targets to abandon the old, no matter
the suffering involved, so they can keep it. Only those who have betrayed
their own moral sense to a place within the system, as a former professor
of Galt Robert Stadler, or those who seem like they have never had, will
affirm that integrity is but a social construction or that nobody should be
truly independent. The Representation of Ayn Rand litterateurs like a bunch
of assholes neurotic willing to take what they could never create is
hilarious and, although sometimes simplistic, remains essentially the truth.
Of course, Atlas Shrugged should be read with a huge grain of salt.
Objectivism has no objection against feminism, contempt lots of family and
race, and of course encourages robber barons to do anything they want. Even
then, the main work of Ayn Rand remains infused with a positive sense of
life and a meaningful analysis of major power relations.
4. Rules for Radicals Saul Alinsky
After books about journalism and advertising are the most notorious ever
written about politics. An agitator and demagogue since the late 1930s,
Saul Alinsky had over thirty years of experience when it published the
Rules for Radicals. This book was covered twice ROK, so I will not comment
on briefly.
While elitist prose of lengthy Lippman philosophical atmosphere that makes
it look like a dead ringer for James Burnham, and while the book Bernays
this "board 40%, 40 stories%, 20% bullshit" brand typical of the personal
business of improving things, Alinsky writes clearly put the reader on a
particular track. A master practitioner of pilpul, he manages to mix a
force-position is right near Ragnar Barberousse is with Marxist tone
blandly. If you can endure the pounding-leftism of his prose, the rules for
radicals explains many strategies while organizing or agitator may be used
in special circumstances.
Stir grievances, focusing on insignificant events or unimportant but makes
important taboos, to lobby key people, rattling a compromise by a war of
attrition before abusing her, making a public target "pregnant with hope"
in you by intimating another public so that it remains of the road are all
strategies Alinsky explained.
Rules for Radicals gives an insider view to the complex workings of the
left, which still applies many of these strategies today. A reader of our
side can also pick up some tips, especially since Alinsky was an outsider
to the areas of the property that contributes to lay off, as we are now.
Reading this I started to think about how the left is trying to prevent us
to imitate. Our attempts to organize & # 8212; & # 8212 legally, are still
frantically despised and repressed. Another example is how they managed to
create an aura "rebel brave" around their characters who faced repression
as each individual pilled red rising is reduced to a common denominator and
defamed. Obviously, the lukewarm conservative Alinsky face are nothing
compared to the implementation we face. I guess it will be our victory all
the more commendable.
5. maneuvered Esther Vilar Man
Esther Vilar in 1975
Published in 1972, just one year after the rules Alinsky, maneuvered Man
Vilar is quite different in all respects except maybe the subject.
Originally written in German, written by an author gentile, man maneuvered
comes from a woman who fell ill with how gender plays the oppressed,
fragile, need help to extract a free service of other, namely men.
Like judeocritical Jews are often the best critics of their own background
& # 8212; think about Gilad Atzmon and Paul Gottfried & # 8212; the rare
breed of women who are too honest and good humor to go along with the
position manipulative peers provide valuable information. Vilar was red
pill, manosphere-friendly before the word was invented.
In a clear style, it exposes the true character of feminist (aggressive,
power-hungry, always projecting their own character to the other, blame
everyone but themselves for their own misery), the daily operation of
approach men plagued with anxiety, and how the hardest sex work becomes
increasingly fragile and forced to passive obedience while women "stress"
without becoming a driving force in politics.
In one shot, Vilar removes gallant sails, white-knightism and hammering the
story of both adversarial and more moderate feminists women. The man is
operated as relevant today as in the 70s It also gives a nice guys context
the key to our generation were raised in & # 8212; a context that has
nothing to do with patriarchy.
In many ways, the man maneuvered as Herrnstein and Murray The Bell Curve:
he sold a lot, but only "behind closed doors" are perpetrators receive
support, and from the start they face defamation of muscular media and
death threats.
48 laws of 6. Robert Greene
Having acquired a personal experience of the power dynamics working in
Hollywood, Greene used his passion for history and writing talent to create
the 48 laws of power. The result was a bestseller. Honestly, its success
was deserved.
"Laws" of Greene are general rules more or less in many power relations.
Some of the rules still apply, some are related to the context, all help to
assess a particular situation and know what is happening. The 48 laws have
a very nice layout, telling stories about an optimistic tone, and interpret
both elegant and deeply. As this book has become a classic, with countless
citing sources, I suggest you get a copy if you have used cheap not open
already cracked.
7. Ryan Holiday Trust Me, I'm lying
Note Holiday repressed haircut Alt-Righter
To end this list is a 2.0 version of Edward Bernays. A college dropout,
Ryan Holiday including (1) how the "big names" of mainstream Internet media
took their stories smaller bloggers, and (2) how to bribe bloggers. Believe
me, I lie explains how hilarious feminist triggered holidays for promoting
a shitty movie without even knowing why, or how he flattered and bribed
Instagramers women so that they would "free" advertising for American
Apparel . Gawker and Jezebel are exposed as unethical, scandal Search
points-disconnecting brain.
When it comes to justify the book, vacation, he said finally disgusted with
all the deception around and opted for spilling the beans. Beware of this
type of display. Many offenders are trying to transform their bad
reputation upside claiming loudly that they moved to a road to Damascus.
Nevertheless, it is quite possible that vacation became really unhappy
because he is not Jewish.
It represents (Chapter 14) Andrew Breitbart as a "media manipulator" who
never tired or morally disturbed by what he did. Perhaps at least some
non-Jews can not imitate the "chosen people" all the way down without
feeling like they betray to the bone.
Believe me, I lay suffering from a liberal bias in the choice of some of
its examples. Mention Breitbart, holiday essentially accuses "Republicans
angry" sore SJWs are doing, and shows sympathy for blacks promoted
undeserved as he does not show for targeted SJW dissidents. It also becomes
repetitive after a while. Yet it is a very good book for a
twenty-something, and it can be considered an applied version of the craft
Bernays.
Conclusion
Power over oneself and social power are two different things. Someone can
quietly enjoy the old and live a good happy life without much of a second,
while someone who enjoys much of the second type of power can bring ruin to
himself and other acting as a whiner right. In any case, today the social
power too easily into something disgusting. For often must design an image,
a public appearance itself is deceptive background.
Be honest with Normie, indoctrinated masses, or crooks that awaits us is
like casting pearls before swine. Understanding leftism, or system, or
women, and see beyond the new endless facades is liberating. But the fact
that we sometimes act so Machiavellian feels disturbing. And yet we have no
choice & # 8212; game is about that, and the masses should be said
with "pedagogy", namely a cunning manner, be oriented in the right
direction. Andrew Breitbart Breitbart had to be in the red pill a much
wider audience than Vdare or ROK.
For more social power, we must be creative and flexible, coming unexpected.
Never compromise, however, on fundamentals. Ayn Rand had it right and
Julius Evola did too. Taking this formulation, the role, the cause, and so
on does not necessarily mean a profound agreement with her. As might say
many cases, "it's not that simple. "And even then, I'm a pain in the
stomach when playing rules Alinsky, and again later, when I went through
vacation to paint hypocritically as a liberal truth teller & # 8212 This
which seems rather ridiculous considering that the title of his book.
Apart from Atlas Shrugged, all the books mentioned here are acidic to some
extent, and remains perhaps much more in them could be considered a
Katabasis after which the sacred texts appear only more illuminating and
refreshing.
Read more: The Idiots are useful Proles a bicentennial map Elite?
Sexbot And Damaged "very dirty" by Horny Men At Tech Conference
Via Breitbart:
A version of Samantha display model, a sex robot popular high technology,
was damaged and "very dirty" by several men at a technical conference in
Barcelona, Spain, this month, according to a report .
Developer Samantha Sergi Santos, said men treated sex robot "like
barbarians", broke two of his fingers and left her "very dirty" at
Electronica Arts Festival.
This is a robot, not a real woman
"People Samantha mounted breasts, legs and arms ... Two fingers were
broken. It was nasty, "said Santos, who added that sexual robot was to be
sent away for repairs and cleaning. "Samantha can withstand a lot, she'll
be fine. "
Samantha, which sells for about $ 6450, has an artificial G, various modes
of interaction and voice activation.
"You can touch Samantha in hands, you can kiss Samantha, she likes to be
kissed," said Santos earlier this year. "Normally she likes to be always
embraced, and as it answers, basically, the G and also the breasts. It can
also respond to the hands. So basically, the hands are family, romantic,
hips are family and romantic, and essentially where she would feel sexy
mouth and the G ".
She never cheat on him
"She has a way of interacting that at first it would be romantic, she would
be the family, and get to a point that she wants to have sex," he
said. "The goal, the ultimate goal of sexual fashion is to give her an
orgasm. "
Read the article
Don t Miss: How fast approaching sexbot technology makes Fearful women
A version of Samantha display model, a sex robot popular high technology,
was damaged and "very dirty" by several men at a technical conference in
Barcelona, Spain, this month, according to a report .
Developer Samantha Sergi Santos, said men treated sex robot "like
barbarians", broke two of his fingers and left her "very dirty" at
Electronica Arts Festival.
This is a robot, not a real woman
"People Samantha mounted breasts, legs and arms ... Two fingers were
broken. It was nasty, "said Santos, who added that sexual robot was to be
sent away for repairs and cleaning. "Samantha can withstand a lot, she'll
be fine. "
Samantha, which sells for about $ 6450, has an artificial G, various modes
of interaction and voice activation.
"You can touch Samantha in hands, you can kiss Samantha, she likes to be
kissed," said Santos earlier this year. "Normally she likes to be always
embraced, and as it answers, basically, the G and also the breasts. It can
also respond to the hands. So basically, the hands are family, romantic,
hips are family and romantic, and essentially where she would feel sexy
mouth and the G ".
She never cheat on him
"She has a way of interacting that at first it would be romantic, she would
be the family, and get to a point that she wants to have sex," he
said. "The goal, the ultimate goal of sexual fashion is to give her an
orgasm. "
Read the article
Don t Miss: How fast approaching sexbot technology makes Fearful women
4 words liberals use weapons to destroy Western society
A very emphatic but very smart, strong and witty radio talk show called
Michael Savage refers to the war left on American values as an attack on
our "borders, language and culture. "I do not think individual pundit or
commentator summarized more accurately this great divide in three simple
words.
The attack on our language in particular, is very dangerous, but effective
tactics & # 8211; it is a battle between intellectuals in the wider war
against our borders and culture, a war which expands and embraces all the
widest range of both the educated and uneducated on both sides of the
debate. That is to say, it does not take an educated man to notice the
attack on our borders and culture, but we can not say for such an attack
calculated on our language.
The English language is a beautiful and complex. For non-native speakers,
it is difficult to learn, and many US citizens graduates with college
degrees still can not write an effective thesis in their own mother tongue.
As such, it is impossible to overstate how disconcerting it is for the
majority of the population are not fully aware that their language was
taken hostage and is compromised daily. The words have little meaning more,
and great speakers this generation & # 8211; men like Alan Watts,
Christopher Hitchens, and other great masters of the word turn definitely
in their graves over what is happening today.
Here are some examples of how the Left has invented new words or kidnapped
existing ones to try to redefine them according to their agenda:
& # 8221 Islamophobia;
A persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation
that leads to a compelling desire to avoid & # 8221. & # 8211;
Dictionary.com
There is no such thing as an irrational fear or aversion to Islam. As for
the specific principles of the Koran and Hadith, the fear of those ideas
being exported to your country is incredibly rational. In addition, an
aversion to stoning women for adultery, throwing homosexuals from roofs or
apostates decapitation seems not only rational, but noble. One could make a
strong argument that to be anti-Islam was synonymous with being pro-human
rights.
The word "Islamophobia" is a ploy & # 8211; a propaganda word used by
Islamists who believe it should be illegal to criticize Islam, to deter the
infidels to the public. As Marco Rubio said, let's dispel the idea that
those who use the word do not know what they do. They just what they do
because they are often lawyers, professors and people of average
intelligence.
We all agree that the discomfort just to see a Hindu or Sikh family on your
flight could be a true testament to intolerance, but that
the "Islamophobia" crowd have deliberately conflate the generic bigotry
towards people with skin brown with the opposition to Islamic doctrine.
This is very dangerous because of the possibility of a slippery slope
progression. Yesterday, he drew Muhammad, he is now criticizing Islam, and
tomorrow he is to be a non-Muslim.
Rape
I can not even.
. The unlawful sexual intercourse or other sexual penetration of the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person, with or without force, with a
sexual organ, the other part of the body or foreign body, without the
consent of the victim and # 8221; & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Have you noticed the qualifier penetration?
We all know the universally discredited myth that claims 1-5 women are the
victims of "sexual assault" on college campuses, but we'll break it down.
Apparently a study was conducted in 2007 concluded that the above
assertion. This wacky study and inherently flawed probed an extremely small
sample of women, deliberated on the terms of the issues in the waves, broad
as possible.
The only study interviewed 5,446 women in two universities, and included
highly subjective questions such as:
"Have you been unable to give consent or to stop what was going on because
you were unconscious, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep? "
"Can you tell us about sexual encounters you think (not sure) happened? "
The first step was to blur the lines between rape, a very specific term,
and sexual assault, a term much larger and a little less severe. The second
step was to expand the definition of "sexual assault" to include rude
comments, touching of the hair or shoulders, even consensual sex between
two drunken adults resulted in women buyer's remorse the next day. The
third step is the vagueness of the definition of consent as a woman waiting
to act responsibly was much lower than a man's, while his speech in a court
meant much more than the his.
Once the term "sexual assault" was diluted in meaning and it was made
interchangeable with rape, which allowed Proctors of the study to double
their confirmation bias and say that 1 in 5 women have actually raped on
American university campuses, painting on unfair picture of men
as "potential rapists" and the American campus as more dangerous than ISIS
territory for a young woman.
& # 8221 racism;
A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a
race & # 8221. & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Dating from the 1970s, the extreme left has hijacked the word "racism" to
include vague conclusions "power." This is an extension of "critical race
theory," which was made popular by a handful of black male and (mostly
obese) university professors white women. He kept a pulse due to modern
racing Hustlers as Marc Lamont Hill and Michael Eric Dyson constantly
referring to during their word salad a week on CNN / MSNBC.
This alternative definition with strong implications of "power" is not a
public definition outside academic classrooms radical left or commentator
panels & # 8220 Said, new stations, but as the far left develops and
becomes more vocal, this definition is more shouting with megaphones
vehemently with each passing year.
These vague conclusions "could" are generally accompanied by other words
the liberal mode as "institutional" and "systemic". These words are as
deliberately broad and generally based on philosophical tropes, referring
to how the effects of slavery are "intractable" even 160 years later. These
race hustlers must fall back on old clichés in the absence of an abundance
of specific examples today. Note that some systemic racism (emails
Ministry: Ferguson Police) are not sufficient evidence to condemn a whole
country of 330 million people "systemic racism".
The goal is simple: to give the impression that whites have a monopoly on
racism. It gives non-whites carte blanche to take their anti-white racism
as they want, because by definition they can not be racist. Forget tens of
millions of white people who live in poverty as we removed an election of a
black president and black attorney general, but even black life loosely
affiliated terrorist material "can not be racist" because they not benefit
from these invisible, so "systems" -called discriminatory, which have been
abolished in the 1960 s.
I waited as long for someone to ask Marc Lamont Hill, Michael Eric Dyson,
or Shaun Talc X & # 8221; King if whites can be racist in South Africa
where they face a genocide, or Zimbabwe, where a government decree they can
not own land. I'm still waiting.
& # 8221 Nazi;
A member of the National Socialist German Workers Party, which controlled
Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler & # 8211; Dictionary.com
There are very few Nazis still living. Many of them are in their 90's and
continued throughout the world for war crimes committed there seven years.
There is indeed a movement resurgent neo-Nazis in the West, largely in
response to this global attack on our borders, language and culture. The
neo-Nazis represent an extreme profound perversion of what we
affectionately call "Western culture". They are absolutist and totalitarian
in their way, what separates them from the rest of the conservatives.
These individuals have been marginalized and relegated to the fringes of
society where they belonged. People like David Duke had not heard in twenty
years, until CNN resurrected him as a weapon to maul with Trump during the
primaries. The movement of white supremacy as a whole was dug in the
darkness by Antifa, who needed an enemy to hit. These neo-Nazis are
throwbacks who share the ideology of the Nazis, but they are not Nazis.
They are impostors Nazis and not nearly as dangerous or intimidating than
the original version, as much as they wish they were.
There are a wide range of sectarianism on the far right, not every
conservative is someone like Richard Spencer. However, the extreme left has
gone nuclear with the term "Nazi" to almost everyone on this side of the
50-yard line. It was quite an exaggeration to say that Milo Yiannopoulos, a
homosexual who prefers black men of a neo-Nazi, but the left has lost any
remaining credibility when calling people like Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris
Nazis. Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew, Harris is a liberal atheist, and both
are strong supporters of the State of Israel. The day these men were called
Nazis for the first time was the irony of the day died.
These examples are not the only four I can think of, but if you are in a
public debate and a word is used in the context mentioned above,
respectfully show that there is no speech that both parties show respect
for the language we all agreed. And if they insist, make sure they
understand that the deployment of the extraordinary luxury of redefining
the words at will could be their non-white privilege speak.
More: this may be the best way to learn a language
Michael Savage refers to the war left on American values as an attack on
our "borders, language and culture. "I do not think individual pundit or
commentator summarized more accurately this great divide in three simple
words.
The attack on our language in particular, is very dangerous, but effective
tactics & # 8211; it is a battle between intellectuals in the wider war
against our borders and culture, a war which expands and embraces all the
widest range of both the educated and uneducated on both sides of the
debate. That is to say, it does not take an educated man to notice the
attack on our borders and culture, but we can not say for such an attack
calculated on our language.
The English language is a beautiful and complex. For non-native speakers,
it is difficult to learn, and many US citizens graduates with college
degrees still can not write an effective thesis in their own mother tongue.
As such, it is impossible to overstate how disconcerting it is for the
majority of the population are not fully aware that their language was
taken hostage and is compromised daily. The words have little meaning more,
and great speakers this generation & # 8211; men like Alan Watts,
Christopher Hitchens, and other great masters of the word turn definitely
in their graves over what is happening today.
Here are some examples of how the Left has invented new words or kidnapped
existing ones to try to redefine them according to their agenda:
& # 8221 Islamophobia;
A persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation
that leads to a compelling desire to avoid & # 8221. & # 8211;
Dictionary.com
There is no such thing as an irrational fear or aversion to Islam. As for
the specific principles of the Koran and Hadith, the fear of those ideas
being exported to your country is incredibly rational. In addition, an
aversion to stoning women for adultery, throwing homosexuals from roofs or
apostates decapitation seems not only rational, but noble. One could make a
strong argument that to be anti-Islam was synonymous with being pro-human
rights.
The word "Islamophobia" is a ploy & # 8211; a propaganda word used by
Islamists who believe it should be illegal to criticize Islam, to deter the
infidels to the public. As Marco Rubio said, let's dispel the idea that
those who use the word do not know what they do. They just what they do
because they are often lawyers, professors and people of average
intelligence.
We all agree that the discomfort just to see a Hindu or Sikh family on your
flight could be a true testament to intolerance, but that
the "Islamophobia" crowd have deliberately conflate the generic bigotry
towards people with skin brown with the opposition to Islamic doctrine.
This is very dangerous because of the possibility of a slippery slope
progression. Yesterday, he drew Muhammad, he is now criticizing Islam, and
tomorrow he is to be a non-Muslim.
Rape
I can not even.
. The unlawful sexual intercourse or other sexual penetration of the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person, with or without force, with a
sexual organ, the other part of the body or foreign body, without the
consent of the victim and # 8221; & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Have you noticed the qualifier penetration?
We all know the universally discredited myth that claims 1-5 women are the
victims of "sexual assault" on college campuses, but we'll break it down.
Apparently a study was conducted in 2007 concluded that the above
assertion. This wacky study and inherently flawed probed an extremely small
sample of women, deliberated on the terms of the issues in the waves, broad
as possible.
The only study interviewed 5,446 women in two universities, and included
highly subjective questions such as:
"Have you been unable to give consent or to stop what was going on because
you were unconscious, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep? "
"Can you tell us about sexual encounters you think (not sure) happened? "
The first step was to blur the lines between rape, a very specific term,
and sexual assault, a term much larger and a little less severe. The second
step was to expand the definition of "sexual assault" to include rude
comments, touching of the hair or shoulders, even consensual sex between
two drunken adults resulted in women buyer's remorse the next day. The
third step is the vagueness of the definition of consent as a woman waiting
to act responsibly was much lower than a man's, while his speech in a court
meant much more than the his.
Once the term "sexual assault" was diluted in meaning and it was made
interchangeable with rape, which allowed Proctors of the study to double
their confirmation bias and say that 1 in 5 women have actually raped on
American university campuses, painting on unfair picture of men
as "potential rapists" and the American campus as more dangerous than ISIS
territory for a young woman.
& # 8221 racism;
A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a
race & # 8221. & # 8211; Dictionary.com
Dating from the 1970s, the extreme left has hijacked the word "racism" to
include vague conclusions "power." This is an extension of "critical race
theory," which was made popular by a handful of black male and (mostly
obese) university professors white women. He kept a pulse due to modern
racing Hustlers as Marc Lamont Hill and Michael Eric Dyson constantly
referring to during their word salad a week on CNN / MSNBC.
This alternative definition with strong implications of "power" is not a
public definition outside academic classrooms radical left or commentator
panels & # 8220 Said, new stations, but as the far left develops and
becomes more vocal, this definition is more shouting with megaphones
vehemently with each passing year.
These vague conclusions "could" are generally accompanied by other words
the liberal mode as "institutional" and "systemic". These words are as
deliberately broad and generally based on philosophical tropes, referring
to how the effects of slavery are "intractable" even 160 years later. These
race hustlers must fall back on old clichés in the absence of an abundance
of specific examples today. Note that some systemic racism (emails
Ministry: Ferguson Police) are not sufficient evidence to condemn a whole
country of 330 million people "systemic racism".
The goal is simple: to give the impression that whites have a monopoly on
racism. It gives non-whites carte blanche to take their anti-white racism
as they want, because by definition they can not be racist. Forget tens of
millions of white people who live in poverty as we removed an election of a
black president and black attorney general, but even black life loosely
affiliated terrorist material "can not be racist" because they not benefit
from these invisible, so "systems" -called discriminatory, which have been
abolished in the 1960 s.
I waited as long for someone to ask Marc Lamont Hill, Michael Eric Dyson,
or Shaun Talc X & # 8221; King if whites can be racist in South Africa
where they face a genocide, or Zimbabwe, where a government decree they can
not own land. I'm still waiting.
& # 8221 Nazi;
A member of the National Socialist German Workers Party, which controlled
Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler & # 8211; Dictionary.com
There are very few Nazis still living. Many of them are in their 90's and
continued throughout the world for war crimes committed there seven years.
There is indeed a movement resurgent neo-Nazis in the West, largely in
response to this global attack on our borders, language and culture. The
neo-Nazis represent an extreme profound perversion of what we
affectionately call "Western culture". They are absolutist and totalitarian
in their way, what separates them from the rest of the conservatives.
These individuals have been marginalized and relegated to the fringes of
society where they belonged. People like David Duke had not heard in twenty
years, until CNN resurrected him as a weapon to maul with Trump during the
primaries. The movement of white supremacy as a whole was dug in the
darkness by Antifa, who needed an enemy to hit. These neo-Nazis are
throwbacks who share the ideology of the Nazis, but they are not Nazis.
They are impostors Nazis and not nearly as dangerous or intimidating than
the original version, as much as they wish they were.
There are a wide range of sectarianism on the far right, not every
conservative is someone like Richard Spencer. However, the extreme left has
gone nuclear with the term "Nazi" to almost everyone on this side of the
50-yard line. It was quite an exaggeration to say that Milo Yiannopoulos, a
homosexual who prefers black men of a neo-Nazi, but the left has lost any
remaining credibility when calling people like Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris
Nazis. Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew, Harris is a liberal atheist, and both
are strong supporters of the State of Israel. The day these men were called
Nazis for the first time was the irony of the day died.
These examples are not the only four I can think of, but if you are in a
public debate and a word is used in the context mentioned above,
respectfully show that there is no speech that both parties show respect
for the language we all agreed. And if they insist, make sure they
understand that the deployment of the extraordinary luxury of redefining
the words at will could be their non-white privilege speak.
More: this may be the best way to learn a language
Millionaire Oxford girl is "too clear" to go to jail after stabbing and her boyfriend Attack
Just like Return Of Kings predicted in June, Oxford medical student Lavinia
Woodward received his pass obediently pussy, with a British judge prison
savings. This despite breaking his bail conditions by sending his victim,
she was stabbed and hit with various physical objects. She was given a very
meager prison ten months suspended by Ian Pringle QC judge.
Using the typical trope of having an older boyfriend who abused & # 8221;
she and pleas immaturity, mental illness, and I have a drug addiction,
Woodward walked out of the courtroom a free woman. Even in a world where we
should be accustomed to favor women, especially in the legal system, its
preferential treatment is more worthy of a second article here.
While men across the Western world, especially the US, are punished for
very fabulist entirely unproven claims of rape and banned from campus
forever, Oxford University is yet to decide to launch Lavinia Woodward
medical school. She was found guilty there are several months, and not by
an academic group or a court but by a court. If you need a single case
study to illustrate how universities are so openly contemptuous of men and
regular procedure lenient toward women behaving badly, here.
Justice Ian Pringle QC stressed he was reluctant to ruin Lavinia Woodward's
career prospects.
After hiring a lawyer who represents the family social status, one of the
main (and most expensive) criminal lawyers in England, James Sturman QC,
Woodward was in a very favorable position from the start. His family's very
rich financial situation has worsened women's privilege she enjoyed already.
Meanwhile, as everyone in the middle and working classes, most of them men,
who end up being imprisoned for actions similar or even much less serious?
That poor, poor girl millionaires!
While Lavinia Woodward spends time idyllic holiday destinations, or just
living his normal life of luxury in Italy, other students slaving away
without resorting to taking drugs or criminal violence.
Here's a brief summary, not exhaustive Lavinia Woodward extraordinary life
of privilege:
his father was an oil company executive multimillionaire;
it often lives in a royal villa as in northern Italy, which belongs to his
mother;
she attended Sir James Henderson British School of Milan, where fees cost
at least the equivalent of $ 20 000 per year, in addition to all other
expenses (Swiss ski trips, etc.) associated with an institution as
prestigious;
while many students slaving away at odd jobs part time to make ends meet,
she is known for taking $ 1400 Chanel designer handbags to the class; and
at the time of his sentence deferred mid-year, it was revealed that she was
currently subject to a mandatory drug testing regime at the insistence of
his college at Oxford, Christ Church, which was supposedly ready to deport
if it did not comply (ROK still doubt the loan part).
Life can not become completely perfect when your family wealth gives that
kind of existence on you, but Lavinia Woodward has a much better life than
99.9% of us, be it man, woman, black, white , liberal or conservative. It's
not ghetto girl whose life of poverty and extreme poverty is doing what she
did.
Worst of all, Woodward still has a fighting chance of qualifying as a
surgeon. Yet if we were chronic drug addicts, fans of family violence, and
just generally unbalanced as this girl is, those of us from the average
regular classroom environments would maintain absolutely no chance of being
recognized as surgeons, lawyers or members of other professions-upper. rung
Unfortunately, I can not imagine a future for Woodward financially as
health care, due to the fact that the powers-either require more surgeons,
software engineers, and scientists & # 8221; no matter the cost. If it
reaches its goal, future male colleagues will likely white knight for it ad
nauseam, ignoring the inevitable emotional outbursts and even serious
mistakes at work.
As you walk in life on eggs, the Lavinia Woodwards in the world can do what
they want and face no consequences
On the positive side, Lavinia Woodward taking drugs and perhaps karma are
his age very badly.
You may be perfectly capable (and overqualified) male candidate for a job
and do not get the position, simply because you're male and mentally
erratic Lavinia Woodward should take your place. If you're on a college
campus right now, you are automatically branded a potential rapist or even
probably because of your genitalia. But a woman with a deranged behavior
proven history of violence and can expect a flood of sympathy and be given
the chance after chance, despite coming from a rich social environment that
says she has an excuse zero for these antics.
Life for modern humans is very similar to walking on eggshells. Without any
bad of your own that you can and will be punished. At the same time, those
who have real things to apologize for, many or most women will constantly
excused their actions and completely ignored.
Who said life in the 21st century was just?
More: Judge: Female medical student who stabbed the man is "too intelligent
enough" to prison
Woodward received his pass obediently pussy, with a British judge prison
savings. This despite breaking his bail conditions by sending his victim,
she was stabbed and hit with various physical objects. She was given a very
meager prison ten months suspended by Ian Pringle QC judge.
Using the typical trope of having an older boyfriend who abused & # 8221;
she and pleas immaturity, mental illness, and I have a drug addiction,
Woodward walked out of the courtroom a free woman. Even in a world where we
should be accustomed to favor women, especially in the legal system, its
preferential treatment is more worthy of a second article here.
While men across the Western world, especially the US, are punished for
very fabulist entirely unproven claims of rape and banned from campus
forever, Oxford University is yet to decide to launch Lavinia Woodward
medical school. She was found guilty there are several months, and not by
an academic group or a court but by a court. If you need a single case
study to illustrate how universities are so openly contemptuous of men and
regular procedure lenient toward women behaving badly, here.
Justice Ian Pringle QC stressed he was reluctant to ruin Lavinia Woodward's
career prospects.
After hiring a lawyer who represents the family social status, one of the
main (and most expensive) criminal lawyers in England, James Sturman QC,
Woodward was in a very favorable position from the start. His family's very
rich financial situation has worsened women's privilege she enjoyed already.
Meanwhile, as everyone in the middle and working classes, most of them men,
who end up being imprisoned for actions similar or even much less serious?
That poor, poor girl millionaires!
While Lavinia Woodward spends time idyllic holiday destinations, or just
living his normal life of luxury in Italy, other students slaving away
without resorting to taking drugs or criminal violence.
Here's a brief summary, not exhaustive Lavinia Woodward extraordinary life
of privilege:
his father was an oil company executive multimillionaire;
it often lives in a royal villa as in northern Italy, which belongs to his
mother;
she attended Sir James Henderson British School of Milan, where fees cost
at least the equivalent of $ 20 000 per year, in addition to all other
expenses (Swiss ski trips, etc.) associated with an institution as
prestigious;
while many students slaving away at odd jobs part time to make ends meet,
she is known for taking $ 1400 Chanel designer handbags to the class; and
at the time of his sentence deferred mid-year, it was revealed that she was
currently subject to a mandatory drug testing regime at the insistence of
his college at Oxford, Christ Church, which was supposedly ready to deport
if it did not comply (ROK still doubt the loan part).
Life can not become completely perfect when your family wealth gives that
kind of existence on you, but Lavinia Woodward has a much better life than
99.9% of us, be it man, woman, black, white , liberal or conservative. It's
not ghetto girl whose life of poverty and extreme poverty is doing what she
did.
Worst of all, Woodward still has a fighting chance of qualifying as a
surgeon. Yet if we were chronic drug addicts, fans of family violence, and
just generally unbalanced as this girl is, those of us from the average
regular classroom environments would maintain absolutely no chance of being
recognized as surgeons, lawyers or members of other professions-upper. rung
Unfortunately, I can not imagine a future for Woodward financially as
health care, due to the fact that the powers-either require more surgeons,
software engineers, and scientists & # 8221; no matter the cost. If it
reaches its goal, future male colleagues will likely white knight for it ad
nauseam, ignoring the inevitable emotional outbursts and even serious
mistakes at work.
As you walk in life on eggs, the Lavinia Woodwards in the world can do what
they want and face no consequences
On the positive side, Lavinia Woodward taking drugs and perhaps karma are
his age very badly.
You may be perfectly capable (and overqualified) male candidate for a job
and do not get the position, simply because you're male and mentally
erratic Lavinia Woodward should take your place. If you're on a college
campus right now, you are automatically branded a potential rapist or even
probably because of your genitalia. But a woman with a deranged behavior
proven history of violence and can expect a flood of sympathy and be given
the chance after chance, despite coming from a rich social environment that
says she has an excuse zero for these antics.
Life for modern humans is very similar to walking on eggshells. Without any
bad of your own that you can and will be punished. At the same time, those
who have real things to apologize for, many or most women will constantly
excused their actions and completely ignored.
Who said life in the 21st century was just?
More: Judge: Female medical student who stabbed the man is "too intelligent
enough" to prison
Thursday, September 28, 2017
How the concept of legitimate government changed from ancient times to our days
Governments, whether enlightened or not, generally provide justification
for their rule. Despotic regimes don t really need beyond justifications &
# 8217 We're in charge, obey or & # 8220;. However, in practice, even
tyrants go through the motions. A & # 8217 People, Democratic Republic
might not be quite a bastion of freedom, but you'll talk a good game of it.
The concept of self-government has its uses, even reduced to a myth.
In ancient times, the leaders (kings, nobles and priests) led society.
Warriors were below them, the realization of the nation's primary
functions: to protect the people and maintain public order. Producers
(everyone) form the third class. Plato wrote the book on this tripartite
structure down. Modern scholarship has noted that this was universal in the
Indo-European societies. India has developed more.
The concept of legitimacy argues that a regime has the moral authority,
while discouraging the promotion of obedience and betrayals. The ruling
class must believe the king deserves the job. The Warriors must obey His
Majesty's officers plump without flinching, not consider a change in diet.
Producers must remain motivated to continue working, obeying the law and
paying taxes.
Despite this cynical perspective, working the tripartite agreement. It is
basically how all countries operate. The degree of freedom & # 8212; the
libertarian ideal in an Orwellian dictatorship & # 8212; it all depends on
how it's implemented. No alternatives exist other than utopian schemes as
half-baked anarchy.
Legitimacy in history
Among the cavemen, the hunter most likely called the shots. Thrasymachus in
Plato's Republic advocated that the severe pragmatism. When tribal
societies emerged, the chief was hereditary work.
During the dawn of civilization, nations emerged. Agriculture has started
to provide a relatively stable food supply for the masses. People
understood how to bake the clay bricks and stacking. City-states in Egypt
in the kingdoms merged North and South, and there are about five thousand
years, they united under one Pharaoh. Around the same time, Mesopotamia and
China came on the world stage. Other nations have arisen over the
centuries, all ruled by monarchs who amassed great wealth and power.
This was particularly problematic. Imagine a political speaking peasant
villagers & # 8217 We, the land re farmers living in mud huts. Meanwhile,
the king saw this huge palace with gold furniture. It has dozens of women,
concubines and slaves boys. It makes lousy decisions and tax our cloths
off. This incompetent weakling hasn t worked a day in her life, and his
sycophants are no different. Really, what makes this so special douchebag &
# 8221 ?;
The ruling class needed to give the public a compelling reason to kiss
their asses. Sometimes obey or isn t enough.
Divine right
Initially, some leaders are set up as deities. It wasn t discouraged by the
priestly class who also mounted the aristocratic gravy train. It didn t
mean the monarch could pull some cool stuff like walking on water or
levitating. However, what mattered was the public at least pay lip service
to the concept.
The Egyptians had to return very seriously in the day. The Romans knew the
imperial cult was baloney, but still had to go through the motions, a major
sore point in the monotheistic Judea. During pagan times, the Anglo-Saxon
kings sometimes their lineage to divine ancestors traced. After all, who
dares challenge Woden great grandkid of?
During the Christian era, these things didn t fly over. Thus, the story
changed: the kings ruled by God's will. To obey the King & # 8212; even if
it were royal asshat & # 8212; was to obey God, and the rebellion was a
sin. The Catholic Church has certainly encouraged this message, and also
has an important political power. To symbolize the divine sanction, bishops
and sometimes chaired coronations Popes (though Napoleon spoiled the
party). Biblical references as follows promoted the concept:
He changes times and seasons: he moves kings, and he raises kings: he gives
wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding:
& # 8212; Daniel 2:21
This leads to a conundrum. This concept of the divine destiny means that
God put cakes as Ivan the Terrible, Idi Amin, Kim Jong Un, and Justin
Trudeau in office. Couldn t God choose better leaders? In contrast, the
Chinese concept of the Mandate of Heaven, of divine approval is subject to
the leaders who act responsibly.
Thus, throughout this period, the legitimacy meant that the king would be
the eldest son of the previous king. How the dynasty's first king to get
support? Usually he was chief as last clan took over the place. S say what
God the will sounds much better.
popular sovereignty
radical extremist militant 1776
Age of Enlightenment philosophers came up with several new ideas such as
limited government, separation of powers, human rights, and people power.
Democracy sometimes existed in ancient Greece and Rome, but otherwise was
largely unknown for centuries. Under this standard, the legitimate
government means that people are in charge.
The first US success has shown that representative government could work.
The electorate now chosen their leaders, directly or indirectly. Religion
(the priesthood update) was still a powerful force in the moral domain, but
lacked political control. Meanwhile, the government has stayed out of their
hair. Following this proof of concept, possibly kings were stripped or
reduced to figureheads. In the mid-20th century, the monarchy was failed,
the only major exception of Saudi Arabia.
Those who prefer throne and altar traditionalism consider the Enlightenment
a big mistake when everything started to go to hell. True, the monarchy had
positive attributes, and made sense when commoners were mostly illiterate.
At that time, were the lords of lords and peasants were peasants, but
nobody has been a marked atomized consumers with a social security number
and damn spied nine ways to Sunday.
Yet we needn t throw the baby out with the bath water. If done correctly,
representative democracy has obvious advantages. People are investing in
their government. Bad politicians can be voted. regime change it without
any hassle, at least theoretically.
ideological government
During the 20th century, communism and fascism have emerged as key players.
In a way, these are the achievements of Plato's philosopher king concept.
In communism, legitimacy means the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. (The
Party defines itself as the people's will, naturally.) Fascism is
essentially populism on steroids, with the nation's interests first. Both
had large government strategies, the clumsy propaganda and ugly records of
human rights. All this was much to communism in fact that fascism has a
worse reputation for fairly obvious reasons.
The fortunes of war were the fall of fascism. Perhaps a better diplomacy
could have avoided it, although the opposition of the League of Nations
made this difficult. Moreover, globalism emerged, opposing nationalism. The
fall of communism was their crazy economic system. former communist nations
still struggling to recover. Neither ideology remains a major player in its
pure form. However, both inspired derived ideologies, a little better and a
little worse.
globalism
Commercial interests falsify American statecraft is nothing new. However,
the most important powerbrokers form of an international clique. In the
early 20th century, the super-rich clique has reached a great power.
Surprisingly, they were quite chummy with communism despite the
Dictatorship of the Proletariat Company. Some even wired the Bolsheviks lot
of money during the Russian Revolution. In the US, they were very
influential in the FDR administration s. Finally, they had their fingers in
the two major parties and the deep state. A small example of Shadow
Government & # 8221; Wall Street influence is Obama's cabinet selection.
As for religion, its influence is greatly diminished the past. However,
mass media & # 8212; The system propaganda arm & # 8212; takes its place.
The celebrities and pop culture are figures he promotes his priesthood.
Most are nauseatingly leftist (or at least know who signs their paychecks)
and use the power structure headed by the globalists. Academia also fills a
priestly role, ready for gravitas.
A surprising number of individuals have been raving about the New World
Order & # 8221;. The public considered this as sinister as hell, So
euphemisms were substituted as global governance and international
cooperation & # 8221;. The goal is to erase the borders gradually. In
practice, this means that free trade, mass immigration for population
replacement, and the transfer of sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats.
However, the way they describe it sounds pretty damn warm and fuzzy.
Plutocratic billionaires pull strings behind the scenes by buying
politicians, a danger to the open nature of democracy. Their favorite
pastime is social engineering, subvert governments, and golf.
Unfortunately, many of our leaders would be sickos are with a God complex.
Worse, they've cultural Marxism installed to a dominant ideology and
practice of its ongoing destabilization scenario. They live like kings and
looking to make all other farmers.
They subverted our society ve s legitimate basis of government. managed
democracy is not democracy. What right have they to do? Really, what makes
these douchebags so special?
More: how a small cabal using socialism & amp; Cultural Marxism to
consolidate the world of power
for their rule. Despotic regimes don t really need beyond justifications &
# 8217 We're in charge, obey or & # 8220;. However, in practice, even
tyrants go through the motions. A & # 8217 People, Democratic Republic
might not be quite a bastion of freedom, but you'll talk a good game of it.
The concept of self-government has its uses, even reduced to a myth.
In ancient times, the leaders (kings, nobles and priests) led society.
Warriors were below them, the realization of the nation's primary
functions: to protect the people and maintain public order. Producers
(everyone) form the third class. Plato wrote the book on this tripartite
structure down. Modern scholarship has noted that this was universal in the
Indo-European societies. India has developed more.
The concept of legitimacy argues that a regime has the moral authority,
while discouraging the promotion of obedience and betrayals. The ruling
class must believe the king deserves the job. The Warriors must obey His
Majesty's officers plump without flinching, not consider a change in diet.
Producers must remain motivated to continue working, obeying the law and
paying taxes.
Despite this cynical perspective, working the tripartite agreement. It is
basically how all countries operate. The degree of freedom & # 8212; the
libertarian ideal in an Orwellian dictatorship & # 8212; it all depends on
how it's implemented. No alternatives exist other than utopian schemes as
half-baked anarchy.
Legitimacy in history
Among the cavemen, the hunter most likely called the shots. Thrasymachus in
Plato's Republic advocated that the severe pragmatism. When tribal
societies emerged, the chief was hereditary work.
During the dawn of civilization, nations emerged. Agriculture has started
to provide a relatively stable food supply for the masses. People
understood how to bake the clay bricks and stacking. City-states in Egypt
in the kingdoms merged North and South, and there are about five thousand
years, they united under one Pharaoh. Around the same time, Mesopotamia and
China came on the world stage. Other nations have arisen over the
centuries, all ruled by monarchs who amassed great wealth and power.
This was particularly problematic. Imagine a political speaking peasant
villagers & # 8217 We, the land re farmers living in mud huts. Meanwhile,
the king saw this huge palace with gold furniture. It has dozens of women,
concubines and slaves boys. It makes lousy decisions and tax our cloths
off. This incompetent weakling hasn t worked a day in her life, and his
sycophants are no different. Really, what makes this so special douchebag &
# 8221 ?;
The ruling class needed to give the public a compelling reason to kiss
their asses. Sometimes obey or isn t enough.
Divine right
Initially, some leaders are set up as deities. It wasn t discouraged by the
priestly class who also mounted the aristocratic gravy train. It didn t
mean the monarch could pull some cool stuff like walking on water or
levitating. However, what mattered was the public at least pay lip service
to the concept.
The Egyptians had to return very seriously in the day. The Romans knew the
imperial cult was baloney, but still had to go through the motions, a major
sore point in the monotheistic Judea. During pagan times, the Anglo-Saxon
kings sometimes their lineage to divine ancestors traced. After all, who
dares challenge Woden great grandkid of?
During the Christian era, these things didn t fly over. Thus, the story
changed: the kings ruled by God's will. To obey the King & # 8212; even if
it were royal asshat & # 8212; was to obey God, and the rebellion was a
sin. The Catholic Church has certainly encouraged this message, and also
has an important political power. To symbolize the divine sanction, bishops
and sometimes chaired coronations Popes (though Napoleon spoiled the
party). Biblical references as follows promoted the concept:
He changes times and seasons: he moves kings, and he raises kings: he gives
wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding:
& # 8212; Daniel 2:21
This leads to a conundrum. This concept of the divine destiny means that
God put cakes as Ivan the Terrible, Idi Amin, Kim Jong Un, and Justin
Trudeau in office. Couldn t God choose better leaders? In contrast, the
Chinese concept of the Mandate of Heaven, of divine approval is subject to
the leaders who act responsibly.
Thus, throughout this period, the legitimacy meant that the king would be
the eldest son of the previous king. How the dynasty's first king to get
support? Usually he was chief as last clan took over the place. S say what
God the will sounds much better.
popular sovereignty
radical extremist militant 1776
Age of Enlightenment philosophers came up with several new ideas such as
limited government, separation of powers, human rights, and people power.
Democracy sometimes existed in ancient Greece and Rome, but otherwise was
largely unknown for centuries. Under this standard, the legitimate
government means that people are in charge.
The first US success has shown that representative government could work.
The electorate now chosen their leaders, directly or indirectly. Religion
(the priesthood update) was still a powerful force in the moral domain, but
lacked political control. Meanwhile, the government has stayed out of their
hair. Following this proof of concept, possibly kings were stripped or
reduced to figureheads. In the mid-20th century, the monarchy was failed,
the only major exception of Saudi Arabia.
Those who prefer throne and altar traditionalism consider the Enlightenment
a big mistake when everything started to go to hell. True, the monarchy had
positive attributes, and made sense when commoners were mostly illiterate.
At that time, were the lords of lords and peasants were peasants, but
nobody has been a marked atomized consumers with a social security number
and damn spied nine ways to Sunday.
Yet we needn t throw the baby out with the bath water. If done correctly,
representative democracy has obvious advantages. People are investing in
their government. Bad politicians can be voted. regime change it without
any hassle, at least theoretically.
ideological government
During the 20th century, communism and fascism have emerged as key players.
In a way, these are the achievements of Plato's philosopher king concept.
In communism, legitimacy means the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. (The
Party defines itself as the people's will, naturally.) Fascism is
essentially populism on steroids, with the nation's interests first. Both
had large government strategies, the clumsy propaganda and ugly records of
human rights. All this was much to communism in fact that fascism has a
worse reputation for fairly obvious reasons.
The fortunes of war were the fall of fascism. Perhaps a better diplomacy
could have avoided it, although the opposition of the League of Nations
made this difficult. Moreover, globalism emerged, opposing nationalism. The
fall of communism was their crazy economic system. former communist nations
still struggling to recover. Neither ideology remains a major player in its
pure form. However, both inspired derived ideologies, a little better and a
little worse.
globalism
Commercial interests falsify American statecraft is nothing new. However,
the most important powerbrokers form of an international clique. In the
early 20th century, the super-rich clique has reached a great power.
Surprisingly, they were quite chummy with communism despite the
Dictatorship of the Proletariat Company. Some even wired the Bolsheviks lot
of money during the Russian Revolution. In the US, they were very
influential in the FDR administration s. Finally, they had their fingers in
the two major parties and the deep state. A small example of Shadow
Government & # 8221; Wall Street influence is Obama's cabinet selection.
As for religion, its influence is greatly diminished the past. However,
mass media & # 8212; The system propaganda arm & # 8212; takes its place.
The celebrities and pop culture are figures he promotes his priesthood.
Most are nauseatingly leftist (or at least know who signs their paychecks)
and use the power structure headed by the globalists. Academia also fills a
priestly role, ready for gravitas.
A surprising number of individuals have been raving about the New World
Order & # 8221;. The public considered this as sinister as hell, So
euphemisms were substituted as global governance and international
cooperation & # 8221;. The goal is to erase the borders gradually. In
practice, this means that free trade, mass immigration for population
replacement, and the transfer of sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats.
However, the way they describe it sounds pretty damn warm and fuzzy.
Plutocratic billionaires pull strings behind the scenes by buying
politicians, a danger to the open nature of democracy. Their favorite
pastime is social engineering, subvert governments, and golf.
Unfortunately, many of our leaders would be sickos are with a God complex.
Worse, they've cultural Marxism installed to a dominant ideology and
practice of its ongoing destabilization scenario. They live like kings and
looking to make all other farmers.
They subverted our society ve s legitimate basis of government. managed
democracy is not democracy. What right have they to do? Really, what makes
these douchebags so special?
More: how a small cabal using socialism & amp; Cultural Marxism to
consolidate the world of power
5 old but impressive weapons that are not obsolete
If there is something that Hollywood has taught us with their implacable
suites remakes and updates feminazi classic films beloved, did newer is not
necessarily synonymous with a superior product. Strange as it may seem at
first glance, some pieces of military equipment also fit into that category.
As with modern blockbusters Hollywood, speed, visual, and fireworks and #
8221; the latest military machines are not always technically impressive.
New military technology often only complements older hardware, not to
replace it completely.
This article shows five pieces of military equipment over 45 years who are
still performing satisfactorily their obligations under the 2010 s. They
will be presented from newest to oldest.
1. F-15 Eagle (1972)
Since 1972, video games increased from & # 8216; & # 8216 Pong; to & #
8216; Grand Theft Auto V & # 8216;. But the F-15 Eagle of the cell and the
order is still largely unchanged.
The McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle is a tactical fighter aircraft that was
designed in the late 1960's (with it's first fully functional flight
achieved in 1972) to obtain and maintain the white air supremacy and
oppress all other (probably Marxist and Muslim) 1970 fiends from heaven who
dared search & # 8216; & # 8217 equality;. This destruction of jet toy box
is like Floyd Mayweather combat aircraft, currently unbeaten in aerial
combat with over 100 wins to zero losses in more than 40 years of service
between different national air forces.
Although technologically surpassed by improved stealth F-22 Raptor in the
US Air Force Eagle remains a fast and powerful weapon, and the army of the
United States are reluctant to send an excessive amount of F-15s either the
scrapheap or Arizona Boneyard to 2030 s. It long service life, with her
impeccable air-destruction rate, means that it will probably be in history
as the best overall fighter jet ever produced.
2. M61 Vulcan (1959)
The M61 Vulcan cannon is a rotating body of six which was dishing 6000 rpm
(yup, no typo there) Mayhem 20mm since 1959, or before most Americans had
never heard of John F. Kennedy. Although generally attached to fixed-wing
aircraft for practical reasons (high speed requires high flight speed of
light), the Vulcan is the public's best known for it's use extreme overkill
in ground combat by stars of Jesse Ventura in Predator action cinema, and
Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator 2.
It is clear that if you want to be an action hero to a state governor, you
better have experience with & # 8221 old without pain, the same exact M61
which was used in the two films. Don worry, you do not hurry, because there
is nothing on the horizon that seems to replace the weapon for it's
destination.
Note: If the US domestic terrorist organization Black Lives Matter took
possession of an M61 Vulcan, there would be many more police victims in
this stage compared to 0.0 inflicted by the Terminator.
3. B-52H (1952)
The B-52 Stratofortress or BUFF (Big Ugly Fat Fucker) and gifts to ISIS
2017 marks the 65th anniversary of the maiden flight of the Stratofortress,
and this aircraft Grandpa has no intention of going on Medicaid and by
resigning for some time to come. This time of the Cold War bombers long
operational range, giant useful load capacity, and relatively low operating
costs keep alive as a major player in American military power until 2045,
an incredible 90 years after s introduction official of the US Air Force in
1955.
Chuck Berry to a hypothetical President Chelsea Clinton (please Lord don t
get there), the B-52 seen everything by the time s finally due to run the
engines for good. Impressive, and also a little disconcerting that we seem
long since reached a technology summit in aircraft capabilities.
4. AK-47 (1946)
Designed at the end of & # 8216; The Great Patriotic War (Russian name for
the Second World War), the AK-47 was intended to serve nationally as a
local response to Nazi Germany's StG 44 (the world first assault rifle s)
and fill Mikhaïl Kalachnikov's personal desire to deter any future
conquests of his homeland; basically, to achieve peace through the power of
upper & # 8220 fire.
So far, his plan has worked in another ward or Napoleon (literally) type
Hitler to invade Russia, but the AK-47 has hardly been the peacemaker of
almost any other part of the globe. The raw destructive power of weapons,
ease of use and reliability in less than ideal conditions made the world's
most popular assault rifle, now over 70 years since it was introduced in
1946.
It is likely to be seen around the world on a regular basis, in conflicts,
big and small, for many decades to come.
5. M114 Howitzer (1942)
Taiwan and South Korea still maintain Capitalist M114 howitzers in their
arsenal to help protect their country from their warring communist blood
brothers, China and North Korea.
The era of World War M114 howitzer continued to remain outstanding for more
years than many men can expect to catch his breath on this Earth & # 8212;
75 years and counting.
Although he was twice surpassed in overall performance and mobility by the
US military's M198 (1979) and now the M777 (2005), long-range artillery and
the high degree of accuracy (when it comes with precise coordinates) means
that many other armed forces in the world see no inherent need to retire
all arsenals M114 they own. Several developed countries like South Korea
and Taiwan is no exception.
Someday, somewhere, and somewhere, the M114 will fire s final shell. But
until that day, a piece of military equipment World War II is still
considered practical for bombarding a fixed position in 2010's is quite a
claim to fame.
Read more: The true story of a carousel-riding Military Wife
suites remakes and updates feminazi classic films beloved, did newer is not
necessarily synonymous with a superior product. Strange as it may seem at
first glance, some pieces of military equipment also fit into that category.
As with modern blockbusters Hollywood, speed, visual, and fireworks and #
8221; the latest military machines are not always technically impressive.
New military technology often only complements older hardware, not to
replace it completely.
This article shows five pieces of military equipment over 45 years who are
still performing satisfactorily their obligations under the 2010 s. They
will be presented from newest to oldest.
1. F-15 Eagle (1972)
Since 1972, video games increased from & # 8216; & # 8216 Pong; to & #
8216; Grand Theft Auto V & # 8216;. But the F-15 Eagle of the cell and the
order is still largely unchanged.
The McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle is a tactical fighter aircraft that was
designed in the late 1960's (with it's first fully functional flight
achieved in 1972) to obtain and maintain the white air supremacy and
oppress all other (probably Marxist and Muslim) 1970 fiends from heaven who
dared search & # 8216; & # 8217 equality;. This destruction of jet toy box
is like Floyd Mayweather combat aircraft, currently unbeaten in aerial
combat with over 100 wins to zero losses in more than 40 years of service
between different national air forces.
Although technologically surpassed by improved stealth F-22 Raptor in the
US Air Force Eagle remains a fast and powerful weapon, and the army of the
United States are reluctant to send an excessive amount of F-15s either the
scrapheap or Arizona Boneyard to 2030 s. It long service life, with her
impeccable air-destruction rate, means that it will probably be in history
as the best overall fighter jet ever produced.
2. M61 Vulcan (1959)
The M61 Vulcan cannon is a rotating body of six which was dishing 6000 rpm
(yup, no typo there) Mayhem 20mm since 1959, or before most Americans had
never heard of John F. Kennedy. Although generally attached to fixed-wing
aircraft for practical reasons (high speed requires high flight speed of
light), the Vulcan is the public's best known for it's use extreme overkill
in ground combat by stars of Jesse Ventura in Predator action cinema, and
Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator 2.
It is clear that if you want to be an action hero to a state governor, you
better have experience with & # 8221 old without pain, the same exact M61
which was used in the two films. Don worry, you do not hurry, because there
is nothing on the horizon that seems to replace the weapon for it's
destination.
Note: If the US domestic terrorist organization Black Lives Matter took
possession of an M61 Vulcan, there would be many more police victims in
this stage compared to 0.0 inflicted by the Terminator.
3. B-52H (1952)
The B-52 Stratofortress or BUFF (Big Ugly Fat Fucker) and gifts to ISIS
2017 marks the 65th anniversary of the maiden flight of the Stratofortress,
and this aircraft Grandpa has no intention of going on Medicaid and by
resigning for some time to come. This time of the Cold War bombers long
operational range, giant useful load capacity, and relatively low operating
costs keep alive as a major player in American military power until 2045,
an incredible 90 years after s introduction official of the US Air Force in
1955.
Chuck Berry to a hypothetical President Chelsea Clinton (please Lord don t
get there), the B-52 seen everything by the time s finally due to run the
engines for good. Impressive, and also a little disconcerting that we seem
long since reached a technology summit in aircraft capabilities.
4. AK-47 (1946)
Designed at the end of & # 8216; The Great Patriotic War (Russian name for
the Second World War), the AK-47 was intended to serve nationally as a
local response to Nazi Germany's StG 44 (the world first assault rifle s)
and fill Mikhaïl Kalachnikov's personal desire to deter any future
conquests of his homeland; basically, to achieve peace through the power of
upper & # 8220 fire.
So far, his plan has worked in another ward or Napoleon (literally) type
Hitler to invade Russia, but the AK-47 has hardly been the peacemaker of
almost any other part of the globe. The raw destructive power of weapons,
ease of use and reliability in less than ideal conditions made the world's
most popular assault rifle, now over 70 years since it was introduced in
1946.
It is likely to be seen around the world on a regular basis, in conflicts,
big and small, for many decades to come.
5. M114 Howitzer (1942)
Taiwan and South Korea still maintain Capitalist M114 howitzers in their
arsenal to help protect their country from their warring communist blood
brothers, China and North Korea.
The era of World War M114 howitzer continued to remain outstanding for more
years than many men can expect to catch his breath on this Earth & # 8212;
75 years and counting.
Although he was twice surpassed in overall performance and mobility by the
US military's M198 (1979) and now the M777 (2005), long-range artillery and
the high degree of accuracy (when it comes with precise coordinates) means
that many other armed forces in the world see no inherent need to retire
all arsenals M114 they own. Several developed countries like South Korea
and Taiwan is no exception.
Someday, somewhere, and somewhere, the M114 will fire s final shell. But
until that day, a piece of military equipment World War II is still
considered practical for bombarding a fixed position in 2010's is quite a
claim to fame.
Read more: The true story of a carousel-riding Military Wife
Inventor of "degenerate" Lifestyle Playboy Hugh Hefner dies at age 91
Via The Daily Mail:
Hugh Hefner, founder of Playboy, has died aged 91.
Hefner was born April 9, 1926 in Chicago, Illinois, and became a
millionaire after founding the influential men's magazine in 1953.
Wednesday evening, the official Twitter account announced Playboy: & #
8216; American icon and Playboy founder Hugh M. Hefner died today. He was
91. # RIPHef & # 8217;.
Hefner's death was confirmed in a statement from Playboy Enterprises that
said it & # 8216 ;. Died today of natural causes at his home, the Playboy
Mansion, surrounded by his family
Hefner's son Cooper Hefner, who is also the creative director of Playboy
Enterprises, said: & # 8216; My father lived a unique and impactful life as
a media and cultural pioneer and a leading voice behind some of the most
important social and cultural movements of our time in the defense of
freedom of expression, civil rights and freedom sexual.
& # 8216; He defined a lifestyle and philosophy that are at the heart of
the Playboy brand, one of the most recognizable and enduring in history.
& # 8216; He will be much missed by many, including his wife Crystal, my
sister and my Christie and David Marston brothers, and all of us at Playboy
Enterprises & # 8217.
It was also reported that Hefner Crystal Harris women inherit nothing after
signing a marriage contract foolproof before their wedding and never has
been added to his will.
Read the article
Read more: Porfirio Rubirosa The Last Playboy
Hugh Hefner, founder of Playboy, has died aged 91.
Hefner was born April 9, 1926 in Chicago, Illinois, and became a
millionaire after founding the influential men's magazine in 1953.
Wednesday evening, the official Twitter account announced Playboy: & #
8216; American icon and Playboy founder Hugh M. Hefner died today. He was
91. # RIPHef & # 8217;.
Hefner's death was confirmed in a statement from Playboy Enterprises that
said it & # 8216 ;. Died today of natural causes at his home, the Playboy
Mansion, surrounded by his family
Hefner's son Cooper Hefner, who is also the creative director of Playboy
Enterprises, said: & # 8216; My father lived a unique and impactful life as
a media and cultural pioneer and a leading voice behind some of the most
important social and cultural movements of our time in the defense of
freedom of expression, civil rights and freedom sexual.
& # 8216; He defined a lifestyle and philosophy that are at the heart of
the Playboy brand, one of the most recognizable and enduring in history.
& # 8216; He will be much missed by many, including his wife Crystal, my
sister and my Christie and David Marston brothers, and all of us at Playboy
Enterprises & # 8217.
It was also reported that Hefner Crystal Harris women inherit nothing after
signing a marriage contract foolproof before their wedding and never has
been added to his will.
Read the article
Read more: Porfirio Rubirosa The Last Playboy
The problems with the teaching men how to find a woman
I recently read an article by Michael Perilloux entitled How to catch a
woman, the latest example of how the modern game's teachings have had a
impact men traditionally minded. Unfortunately, I think the advice is far
Perilloux to help men find in fact a woman.
I have my first child on the way with my beautiful traditional woman. I am
blessed to have it, but our relationship was not a happy accident.
Just a few years I decided I was going to marry. So I did. I made plans, my
life restructured and developed the relevant skills. It worked.
His declaration of victory is premature. With a short courtship, rapid
pregnancy, and a little bread still in the oven, it can still be in her
wedding honeymoon phase, or at least in the phase where major differences,
as with the education of children, are still not on the surface. I hope
that her marriage is successful, but we should not give much weight to the
article the initial demonstration of authority. There are a lot of divorced
men who reported problems for you in their former wives first pregnancy.
The first men problem have is "Naive Romanticism," which is the belief that
you can just cruise through life, relax, without worrying about getting
married, and "he" will come at some point and you sweep your feet as a kind
of romantic comedy.
I don t know a single man who has this problem. If anything, it's the
problem of women. Men are reluctant to marriage today simply because there
are more drawbacks than positives to marry. With plenty of free sex, casual
relationships, digital entertainment, and urban fun, there is no advantage
in marriage, unless you specifically want to create a family, and that
comes with the knowledge that State is ready to destroy you by punitive
laws family. Men abstain from marriage because rational choices, not
idealism.
You know what else is unromantic? only die childless.
The fact is that this is the most important issue in your life. You must
also take seriously your professional career, starting a business, or
planning an invasion.
The only downside, he mentioned not to marry is dying alone. It is a fear
shared by many, but the problem with a fear like this is to avoid it, you
rush in shares flawed and make decisions that cause fear to possess you.
If I am afraid of dying alone, and catch my girlfriend or wife cheating
when I m in my 30s or beyond, I m more likely to make the disastrous
decision to keep almost guarantee I & # 8217; ll be cucked again. A better
approach is to accept your fears and make the choice that is a positive
gain in your life instead of one that simply avoids negative pain.
Our ancestors lived in a very different society. They homogeneous, high
trust communities where their neighbors were in the same class, folk,
faith, and social environments. They all grew up together, went to church
together, and were well integrated into the social fabric where everyone
knew each other. Ongoing, every young man knew many eligible girls who
would make good games. Parents, friends, old busybody women, tradition and
happy circumstance random conspire to make the marriage almost automatic
success. naive romanticism was a perfectly adequate strategy in this
environment, because the marriage was supported by such powerful social
machine, which no longer exists.
Perilloux is true that the path of least resistance in the past was the
wedding. In other words, the social structure was such that a woman would
land on your lap to have a full time job, or even just planning to have
one. You don t have to date, learn the game, go to the gym, not your
banter, be presumptuous, and so on.
A society is healthy if the creation of a family is the default mode of the
structure of the relationship that is as rational as men do. The marriage
has its problems, but the alternative at the time not to marry was much
more downsides, especially in a climate that was not as promiscuous or home
of the eternal bachelor lifestyle.
One reason that the marriage was a good deal because you have to study nt
game, fitness, and psychology, and then apply this knowledge learned
through hundreds of hours of work just to get into a meaningful
relationship . If you must do this work today to get married, and the sword
of Damocles hanging over your head through an anti-male culture with the
support of court, no marriage yet become a low friction force? It doesn t,
so Perilloux has no other choice but to implement a model of success in his
hunt for a woman to get there in a degenerate age.
To replace the naive romanticism, we need fundamental male life skill in
the real world: the will and the confidence to take a serious problem and
deliberately included how to solve it. You can sit and think about this
problem through, reach an agreement, make plans, and the reason of things.
This is the only way any real fact ever.
By throwing the naive romanticism, which is basically a passive strategy,
it is helpful to have a much more active and the top of the agency model to
work.
[& # 8230;]
Modern women also have all kinds of little psychological blocks that derail
your chance to marry, unless you go with an iron will to bust through all
their stupid resistances and win. My own courtship, for example, was full
of rocky uncertainty, resistance, and the lack of will on his part. It
would not have happened if I had not ignored all this and put my will in
making it happen.
To find a woman Perilloux pushes us to treat it like a business by being
goal-oriented and transfer of will and energy to the task. I have used my
willingness in the past to do things I dreamed when I was younger, like
quit my job, traveling to dozens of countries, emigrating from the United
States, and bedding many women who all were more-or-less individualistic
crusades, m but I hesitate to use the same process to find a wife.
As a man, I can certainly hunt and work for what I want, but the
relationships are different you want a woman to put in as much investment
and will of its own. The more it's invested, the more likely it will stay.
If I put in full will, and it sets in less than me, it's inevitable that I
feel underestimated and tired as she coasts or enjoying my efforts, which
will not be easy to maintain indefinitely.
Just as when launching nuclear missiles, two officers must turn their key
simultaneously, and outside of being a leader and fill the male roles in
the relationship, I do not think a man should do all the work to maintain
it, I suspect Perilloux done. How do we know that his wife is just going
along for the ride because it makes it so easy for her? What happens if he
gets tired, ill, or employment problems? Does his wife to stay with him?
We don know the family situation or type of challenges his wife puts up
being convinced of his method, which seems to reduce investment, the woman
must be for the sole purpose of getting a woman. We also charge know what
other sacrifices he has made. Costs will be simply too much for most men,
especially those who are not convinced that marriage is the most rational
choice to make, like myself. The men who took the red pill can t just
pretend that they do know the true nature of women and the chances of the
company stacked against them to perform Perilloux mission.
Often people do not keep their eyes on [the] fundamental and confused with
ideas about true love and such. But love is a side effect, not fundamental.
If the fundamentals are good, love will come. If the fundamentals are not
good, love will not help. Consider the results of arranged marriages, where
families set up marriages with good fundamentals regardless of love. They
are very stable, and they are in love anyway.
Good luck to convince modern women that love is a side effect! It's not
just Hollywood that pushes the romance, but the whole of the West, which
has been underway since the 18th century. You are simply not going to get
the average woman to adopt practical standards of Indian women who engage
in arranged marriages, for example, and if you can not find, none of your
Mattered tactics anyway because it was ready to be with a man for practical
reasons.
It is not Perilloux convinced his wife to be practical about love, but she
was already convinced, perhaps to be raised in a more traditional
environment. For most people who live in urban areas, these traditional
women are totally out of reach, so I suspect Perilloux lives in a small
town.
Chances are you are reading from a metropolis like London, New York and
Toronto, so I need to get you to move to a smaller city, get a new job, or
dramatically change your environment and habits essentially become a new
person to the prospect of finding a woman to be in charge of that, chances
are, has a 50% chance of kicking you to the curb at one time. That's a
possible sale.
Regarding the search for a woman, the problem is not a game or standards,
but society: there are simply not enough traditional women to go around for
men who are living in urban areas who tip the balance of the marriage to be
rational irrational. Of course, if I move to a specific area, join the
church, and give value to the community, I'll probably find a woman, but
upsetting your life for a target means that the goal you leads, now and for
all that marriage. I can t good faith encourages men to make drastic life
changes beyond the general self-improvement questions or to take a two-week
trip to Brazil.
In the past, men didn t have to change their lives to find the women, and
the likelihood of divorce was much lower. Why should I make a sacrifice for
less potential gain? So I really see the value of having a family, and
would be open to being a father, the woman and the situation must be fair
for me to take a huge risk today s climate. and tell me men like myself
basically man and getting married is not going to cut it.
Perilloux article shines when it comes to assessing a girl based on her
wifely standards:
she is feminine and traditional? Want a traditional woman who acts as such.
Many women "anti-feminist" does not practice what they preach, so beware.
It should feel comfortable taking the female role in marriage.
she is a virgin? You do not want the kind of girl who has a lot
of "partying" before "settling" you do not want the baggage, you do not
want you thinking of retiring, and you do not want the spectrum these other
men that haunt your marriage.
Does it have good domestic and family skills? Can she keep house, cook,
clean, handle finances, decorate, host, sew, fix, and so on? She is good
with children? Is it comfortable and happy to do these tasks?
Does she want to be a wife and mother to many children? Women can be
difficult to convince. Big bonus if she already wants a big family.
Does she believe in traditional marriage and oppose divorce? There will be
times when she will love you more. For the marriage to work, it must be
held anyway, because she believes in marriage. Make sure it is committed to
the idea of marriage, not only for you.
Unsurprisingly, no girl I've been in a relationship with hit on all points.
I have standards that I believe to be optimal, but in reality they are not
realistic if I can t in stock at the market. Although it is an encouraging
sign that traditionalism is emerging as a new against-culture, this change
will be too slow for men who are in their late 20s or beyond hope and wait.
Many miss the boat of paternity, probably myself including, but our
experiences can at least help the men of future generations.
The most flaccid section part is when Perilloux tries to share how to meet
a woman, a desire pressing for men who are already well versed in the game
and know what they are looking for.
social proximity. You must maximize the number of good women in social
proximity. The finest women moving through your social network, the better.
This means changing your lifestyle, social settings, and activity level.
Some places will be much better than others; find places and walks with the
finest women. Good traditional churches, groups, hobbies, friends circles,
parties, family networks, charities, where you live, even applications
dating. All you have or can get to be used.
Spotted. You have to keep an active lookout for good women, so you really
notice them. You are the screening of the most visible factors: she is
pretty, she is young, she is feminine, how does it work dress, is it your
people, how it is transported, does it look virtuous, what his eyes as
social interaction, which she associates with?
That's the extent of his advice, which may have been swiped from the art of
Manliness. He missed a great opportunity to share how he met his wife and
that the process was, but kept so general that it provides little in the
way of action items. I m forced to guess that he met his wife to church for
her to hit all the traditional notes.
Just a few months I started researching the churches in my area, not to
meet women, but to put myself in a spiritual environment. I also researched
local resources to volunteer to help others, since I stay at home job
Internet doesn t put me in contact with many people. I haven t yet pulled
the trigger, since I fell into the old gambling habits after a recent
break, but if inserting myself in these environments puts me in touch with
the traditional women, and to enter into relations with them becomes
rational choice with little friction is encouraged by my most immediate
environment and society in general, I would certainly continue.
However, I will not attempt Perilloux s strategy will power because I m too
red pilled to put on blinders for a singular purpose that I am not
absolutely convinced is in the end, no matter how I'm open to paternity.
I also know from experience that the will alone is not enough, and will
lead to easy come-easy-go scenarios where flag things out if my will is
reduced, as is often the case when meeting a girl by cold approach. This n
t to say I'm not ready to be implemented, but as I painfully learned, it
takes a village to maintain a relationship, because even if I do everything
right, things can still go south.
If these times make too sick to create a family by rational means then I
won t start a family, although I certainly wish tastes lucky Perilloux and
watch from afar to see how he created his safe space wedding away evils
around him.
Ultimately, we must be careful to take advice of men who have a sample size
of a wedding. It's easy to create rigorous models for the game because you
can develop your theories sleeping with hundreds of women and patterns of
teasing, but you can t have a more successful marriage. There is just too
much variance between a man and another when it comes to such an advanced
objective, which is why I think we will never have solid information on
finding a woman in a civilization dying. This is a problem you have to
understand yourself, assuming you even want.
This article was originally published on Roosh V.
Read more: What I learned about women from my long-term relationships
woman, the latest example of how the modern game's teachings have had a
impact men traditionally minded. Unfortunately, I think the advice is far
Perilloux to help men find in fact a woman.
I have my first child on the way with my beautiful traditional woman. I am
blessed to have it, but our relationship was not a happy accident.
Just a few years I decided I was going to marry. So I did. I made plans, my
life restructured and developed the relevant skills. It worked.
His declaration of victory is premature. With a short courtship, rapid
pregnancy, and a little bread still in the oven, it can still be in her
wedding honeymoon phase, or at least in the phase where major differences,
as with the education of children, are still not on the surface. I hope
that her marriage is successful, but we should not give much weight to the
article the initial demonstration of authority. There are a lot of divorced
men who reported problems for you in their former wives first pregnancy.
The first men problem have is "Naive Romanticism," which is the belief that
you can just cruise through life, relax, without worrying about getting
married, and "he" will come at some point and you sweep your feet as a kind
of romantic comedy.
I don t know a single man who has this problem. If anything, it's the
problem of women. Men are reluctant to marriage today simply because there
are more drawbacks than positives to marry. With plenty of free sex, casual
relationships, digital entertainment, and urban fun, there is no advantage
in marriage, unless you specifically want to create a family, and that
comes with the knowledge that State is ready to destroy you by punitive
laws family. Men abstain from marriage because rational choices, not
idealism.
You know what else is unromantic? only die childless.
The fact is that this is the most important issue in your life. You must
also take seriously your professional career, starting a business, or
planning an invasion.
The only downside, he mentioned not to marry is dying alone. It is a fear
shared by many, but the problem with a fear like this is to avoid it, you
rush in shares flawed and make decisions that cause fear to possess you.
If I am afraid of dying alone, and catch my girlfriend or wife cheating
when I m in my 30s or beyond, I m more likely to make the disastrous
decision to keep almost guarantee I & # 8217; ll be cucked again. A better
approach is to accept your fears and make the choice that is a positive
gain in your life instead of one that simply avoids negative pain.
Our ancestors lived in a very different society. They homogeneous, high
trust communities where their neighbors were in the same class, folk,
faith, and social environments. They all grew up together, went to church
together, and were well integrated into the social fabric where everyone
knew each other. Ongoing, every young man knew many eligible girls who
would make good games. Parents, friends, old busybody women, tradition and
happy circumstance random conspire to make the marriage almost automatic
success. naive romanticism was a perfectly adequate strategy in this
environment, because the marriage was supported by such powerful social
machine, which no longer exists.
Perilloux is true that the path of least resistance in the past was the
wedding. In other words, the social structure was such that a woman would
land on your lap to have a full time job, or even just planning to have
one. You don t have to date, learn the game, go to the gym, not your
banter, be presumptuous, and so on.
A society is healthy if the creation of a family is the default mode of the
structure of the relationship that is as rational as men do. The marriage
has its problems, but the alternative at the time not to marry was much
more downsides, especially in a climate that was not as promiscuous or home
of the eternal bachelor lifestyle.
One reason that the marriage was a good deal because you have to study nt
game, fitness, and psychology, and then apply this knowledge learned
through hundreds of hours of work just to get into a meaningful
relationship . If you must do this work today to get married, and the sword
of Damocles hanging over your head through an anti-male culture with the
support of court, no marriage yet become a low friction force? It doesn t,
so Perilloux has no other choice but to implement a model of success in his
hunt for a woman to get there in a degenerate age.
To replace the naive romanticism, we need fundamental male life skill in
the real world: the will and the confidence to take a serious problem and
deliberately included how to solve it. You can sit and think about this
problem through, reach an agreement, make plans, and the reason of things.
This is the only way any real fact ever.
By throwing the naive romanticism, which is basically a passive strategy,
it is helpful to have a much more active and the top of the agency model to
work.
[& # 8230;]
Modern women also have all kinds of little psychological blocks that derail
your chance to marry, unless you go with an iron will to bust through all
their stupid resistances and win. My own courtship, for example, was full
of rocky uncertainty, resistance, and the lack of will on his part. It
would not have happened if I had not ignored all this and put my will in
making it happen.
To find a woman Perilloux pushes us to treat it like a business by being
goal-oriented and transfer of will and energy to the task. I have used my
willingness in the past to do things I dreamed when I was younger, like
quit my job, traveling to dozens of countries, emigrating from the United
States, and bedding many women who all were more-or-less individualistic
crusades, m but I hesitate to use the same process to find a wife.
As a man, I can certainly hunt and work for what I want, but the
relationships are different you want a woman to put in as much investment
and will of its own. The more it's invested, the more likely it will stay.
If I put in full will, and it sets in less than me, it's inevitable that I
feel underestimated and tired as she coasts or enjoying my efforts, which
will not be easy to maintain indefinitely.
Just as when launching nuclear missiles, two officers must turn their key
simultaneously, and outside of being a leader and fill the male roles in
the relationship, I do not think a man should do all the work to maintain
it, I suspect Perilloux done. How do we know that his wife is just going
along for the ride because it makes it so easy for her? What happens if he
gets tired, ill, or employment problems? Does his wife to stay with him?
We don know the family situation or type of challenges his wife puts up
being convinced of his method, which seems to reduce investment, the woman
must be for the sole purpose of getting a woman. We also charge know what
other sacrifices he has made. Costs will be simply too much for most men,
especially those who are not convinced that marriage is the most rational
choice to make, like myself. The men who took the red pill can t just
pretend that they do know the true nature of women and the chances of the
company stacked against them to perform Perilloux mission.
Often people do not keep their eyes on [the] fundamental and confused with
ideas about true love and such. But love is a side effect, not fundamental.
If the fundamentals are good, love will come. If the fundamentals are not
good, love will not help. Consider the results of arranged marriages, where
families set up marriages with good fundamentals regardless of love. They
are very stable, and they are in love anyway.
Good luck to convince modern women that love is a side effect! It's not
just Hollywood that pushes the romance, but the whole of the West, which
has been underway since the 18th century. You are simply not going to get
the average woman to adopt practical standards of Indian women who engage
in arranged marriages, for example, and if you can not find, none of your
Mattered tactics anyway because it was ready to be with a man for practical
reasons.
It is not Perilloux convinced his wife to be practical about love, but she
was already convinced, perhaps to be raised in a more traditional
environment. For most people who live in urban areas, these traditional
women are totally out of reach, so I suspect Perilloux lives in a small
town.
Chances are you are reading from a metropolis like London, New York and
Toronto, so I need to get you to move to a smaller city, get a new job, or
dramatically change your environment and habits essentially become a new
person to the prospect of finding a woman to be in charge of that, chances
are, has a 50% chance of kicking you to the curb at one time. That's a
possible sale.
Regarding the search for a woman, the problem is not a game or standards,
but society: there are simply not enough traditional women to go around for
men who are living in urban areas who tip the balance of the marriage to be
rational irrational. Of course, if I move to a specific area, join the
church, and give value to the community, I'll probably find a woman, but
upsetting your life for a target means that the goal you leads, now and for
all that marriage. I can t good faith encourages men to make drastic life
changes beyond the general self-improvement questions or to take a two-week
trip to Brazil.
In the past, men didn t have to change their lives to find the women, and
the likelihood of divorce was much lower. Why should I make a sacrifice for
less potential gain? So I really see the value of having a family, and
would be open to being a father, the woman and the situation must be fair
for me to take a huge risk today s climate. and tell me men like myself
basically man and getting married is not going to cut it.
Perilloux article shines when it comes to assessing a girl based on her
wifely standards:
she is feminine and traditional? Want a traditional woman who acts as such.
Many women "anti-feminist" does not practice what they preach, so beware.
It should feel comfortable taking the female role in marriage.
she is a virgin? You do not want the kind of girl who has a lot
of "partying" before "settling" you do not want the baggage, you do not
want you thinking of retiring, and you do not want the spectrum these other
men that haunt your marriage.
Does it have good domestic and family skills? Can she keep house, cook,
clean, handle finances, decorate, host, sew, fix, and so on? She is good
with children? Is it comfortable and happy to do these tasks?
Does she want to be a wife and mother to many children? Women can be
difficult to convince. Big bonus if she already wants a big family.
Does she believe in traditional marriage and oppose divorce? There will be
times when she will love you more. For the marriage to work, it must be
held anyway, because she believes in marriage. Make sure it is committed to
the idea of marriage, not only for you.
Unsurprisingly, no girl I've been in a relationship with hit on all points.
I have standards that I believe to be optimal, but in reality they are not
realistic if I can t in stock at the market. Although it is an encouraging
sign that traditionalism is emerging as a new against-culture, this change
will be too slow for men who are in their late 20s or beyond hope and wait.
Many miss the boat of paternity, probably myself including, but our
experiences can at least help the men of future generations.
The most flaccid section part is when Perilloux tries to share how to meet
a woman, a desire pressing for men who are already well versed in the game
and know what they are looking for.
social proximity. You must maximize the number of good women in social
proximity. The finest women moving through your social network, the better.
This means changing your lifestyle, social settings, and activity level.
Some places will be much better than others; find places and walks with the
finest women. Good traditional churches, groups, hobbies, friends circles,
parties, family networks, charities, where you live, even applications
dating. All you have or can get to be used.
Spotted. You have to keep an active lookout for good women, so you really
notice them. You are the screening of the most visible factors: she is
pretty, she is young, she is feminine, how does it work dress, is it your
people, how it is transported, does it look virtuous, what his eyes as
social interaction, which she associates with?
That's the extent of his advice, which may have been swiped from the art of
Manliness. He missed a great opportunity to share how he met his wife and
that the process was, but kept so general that it provides little in the
way of action items. I m forced to guess that he met his wife to church for
her to hit all the traditional notes.
Just a few months I started researching the churches in my area, not to
meet women, but to put myself in a spiritual environment. I also researched
local resources to volunteer to help others, since I stay at home job
Internet doesn t put me in contact with many people. I haven t yet pulled
the trigger, since I fell into the old gambling habits after a recent
break, but if inserting myself in these environments puts me in touch with
the traditional women, and to enter into relations with them becomes
rational choice with little friction is encouraged by my most immediate
environment and society in general, I would certainly continue.
However, I will not attempt Perilloux s strategy will power because I m too
red pilled to put on blinders for a singular purpose that I am not
absolutely convinced is in the end, no matter how I'm open to paternity.
I also know from experience that the will alone is not enough, and will
lead to easy come-easy-go scenarios where flag things out if my will is
reduced, as is often the case when meeting a girl by cold approach. This n
t to say I'm not ready to be implemented, but as I painfully learned, it
takes a village to maintain a relationship, because even if I do everything
right, things can still go south.
If these times make too sick to create a family by rational means then I
won t start a family, although I certainly wish tastes lucky Perilloux and
watch from afar to see how he created his safe space wedding away evils
around him.
Ultimately, we must be careful to take advice of men who have a sample size
of a wedding. It's easy to create rigorous models for the game because you
can develop your theories sleeping with hundreds of women and patterns of
teasing, but you can t have a more successful marriage. There is just too
much variance between a man and another when it comes to such an advanced
objective, which is why I think we will never have solid information on
finding a woman in a civilization dying. This is a problem you have to
understand yourself, assuming you even want.
This article was originally published on Roosh V.
Read more: What I learned about women from my long-term relationships
Wednesday, September 27, 2017
"Pro-communist" military officer could have gotten away with Betrayal If it has not Brag online
Via The Hill:
The US military said on Tuesday it was probing a West Point graduate's
pro-communist messages on social media.
The army was quick to announce that it was examining posts by 2 Lieutenant
Spenser Rapone, issuing a statement Tuesday saying, Second Lieutenant
Rapone s shares do not reflect the values of the Military Academy of the
United States or US army & # 8221.
as actors of public confidence, members of the army should have exemplary
behavior, and it is forbidden to engage in certain expressions of political
speech in uniform. Second Lieutenant Rapone chain of command is aware of
his actions and looks at the question. The academy is ready to help the
officer s the necessary chain of command, the statement continued.
Rapone has two positions clearly pro-communists on Twitter this week,
including one in which he expressed his support for Argentine communist
revolutionary Che Guevara.
If there was a nagging doubt, hasta la victoria siempre, Rapone tweeted
Monday with a photo showing him a red shirt adorned with Guevara's face
under his uniform.
If there was a nagging doubt, hasta la victoria siempre
pic.twitter.com/0XrW38wcCk
& Mdash; Commie Bebop🌹 (@punkproletarian) September 25, 2017
Rapone posted another photo on Sunday taking his military hat with the
message communism win written inside in a tweet expressing support for
free-agent NFL Colin Kaepernick from President Trump's attacks on NFL
players taking a knee in protest during the national anthem.
#VeteransForKaepernick pic.twitter.com/3jnCtawvHc
& Mdash; Commie Bebop🌹 (@punkproletarian) On September 24, 2017
Read the article
Don MISS: 5 reasons why women in school Ranger army is worse than you think
The US military said on Tuesday it was probing a West Point graduate's
pro-communist messages on social media.
The army was quick to announce that it was examining posts by 2 Lieutenant
Spenser Rapone, issuing a statement Tuesday saying, Second Lieutenant
Rapone s shares do not reflect the values of the Military Academy of the
United States or US army & # 8221.
as actors of public confidence, members of the army should have exemplary
behavior, and it is forbidden to engage in certain expressions of political
speech in uniform. Second Lieutenant Rapone chain of command is aware of
his actions and looks at the question. The academy is ready to help the
officer s the necessary chain of command, the statement continued.
Rapone has two positions clearly pro-communists on Twitter this week,
including one in which he expressed his support for Argentine communist
revolutionary Che Guevara.
If there was a nagging doubt, hasta la victoria siempre, Rapone tweeted
Monday with a photo showing him a red shirt adorned with Guevara's face
under his uniform.
If there was a nagging doubt, hasta la victoria siempre
pic.twitter.com/0XrW38wcCk
& Mdash; Commie Bebop🌹 (@punkproletarian) September 25, 2017
Rapone posted another photo on Sunday taking his military hat with the
message communism win written inside in a tweet expressing support for
free-agent NFL Colin Kaepernick from President Trump's attacks on NFL
players taking a knee in protest during the national anthem.
#VeteransForKaepernick pic.twitter.com/3jnCtawvHc
& Mdash; Commie Bebop🌹 (@punkproletarian) On September 24, 2017
Read the article
Don MISS: 5 reasons why women in school Ranger army is worse than you think
4 Unconventional "Bio-hacks" that actually work
Everywhere you look, there's some self-proclaimed expert spitting a
complete nonsense, trying to make you buy its latest program. $ 19.95 The
fitness industry is perhaps one of the most BS-mounted in all the existence
and the emerging bio-piracy industry industry is right up there with it.
Bio-hacking is exactly what it sounds like & # 8212; hacking your biology.
Bio-hackers seek to change their environment, adjust their food intake,
change methods of exercise, and use technology to create an optimal body
and mind. Unfortunately, despite the very cool premise, the industry is
full of scams and outright liars artists.
Most bio-best hacks can be done for free, and only some are expensive (over
$ 1000). As someone who's been involved in this area of influence for
years, here's a list of my favorite bio-hacks and effective.
1. Binaural Beats
Do binaural beats work & # 8221 ?; one of my clients asked. Yes, they
work, I said. No, they really like & # 8221 ?; he asked again. Yes, I said.
Are you trying to & # 8221.
Since I presented to binaural beats sometime around 2013, I have
recommended them almost every coach I customer & # 8212; and while they may
seem like something from a science fiction film, it's growing mountain of
evidence proving their effectiveness.
In layman's terms, binaural beats are essentially a series of frequencies
that you listen, played so they alter your brain's state. You want to get
in the state, before going out to get a girl's number? Great, listen to
alpha frequency binaural beats. Or maybe you want to fall asleep quickly?
That's also good, just plug a delta frequency, binaural beats and watch you
slowly drift off to sleep.
Binaural beats are hands down one of the most effective tools of biopiracy
I discovered to date, and in my experience, they will work for about 90% of
people (the remaining 10% of cases difficult). I recommend using the flow
of life, but others have found success with Brain.fm and Hemisync.
2. Alpha Male Posture
Mike Cernovich first popularized this technique in its Gorilla Mindset
morning routine, I urge you to check. We all know that certain postures are
associated with alpha males, and other postures are associated with beta
males, right? Although bio-hacking takes a step further.
With bio-hack alpha male posture, you just imitate the body language of
high status. It is to stand straight with your chest, throwing your arms in
the air, and even beat your chest like a silverback gorilla.
While it may seem silly, it's actually been proven to increase your
testosterone levels and decrease your cortisol in a matter of just 60
seconds. In one experiment, the researchers found that simply changing
their test subjects body language led to a significant difference in their
ability to accomplish a daunting task (bungee jumping).
If you were wondering how to be an alpha male, the best place to start is
to change your behavior. This n t mean neglecting the thought processes
underlying behind being an alpha male, as the realization of these is how
you really turn into a & # 8212; but is certainly something to be said for
this pretend until you do.
3. Light Therapy
For millennia, humans have a complex and intimate relationship with the day
and night. They follow the natural rhythms of sunrise and sunset, which
dictate their daily schedule. Now, however, with artificial light that
bombards us every second of the day, many of us find that our circadian
rhythms are so out of whack.
This is light therapy. is available studies have shown that light
regulation is an effective way to optimize your hormones, energy levels,
and sleep & # 8212; three things every man should value.
The first, and easiest way for you to start light hacking, is to install
the application on your computer F.lux. It automatically dim your screen to
simulate sunrise and sunset, eliminating the light waves of blue frequency
that prevents the production of melatonin.
The second option, and more expensive, is to buy a light box. They can
range from $ 30 to $ 300, and although it might be a bit of an extra
hassle, I strongly recommend that you order one and try it just for a week.
I have a mounted right on my night table, scheduled to blast my face with
10 000 lux of pure light, removing any possibility to go back to sleep.
Expose your eyes to this artificial light, the first thing in the morning
helps regulate your hormones and the sleep cycle, so it can be especially
helpful for people who suffer from insomnia and other sleep disorders.
4. cryotherapy
Experts slowly discover that 99% of our ills are due to inflammation.
Depression has been linked to brain inflamed Crohn's has been linked to
inflammation gastrointestinal tract, and even obesity has been linked to
inflammation of the entire body.
In response to this discovery, a new branch of medicine known under the
name cryotherapy, began to emerge. The idea is simple & # 8212; subjecting
the body to temperatures ungodly to combat inflammation massively. Although
the premise is relatively easy to understand, it has incredible benefits
for health.
cryotherapy centers have been popping up all over the country, and then
they use advanced technology and liquid nitrogen to obtain such cold
temperatures, you can create a DIY version of you. Many athletes now use
cold baths, which can run you around $ 1500 for the installation costs
once, not counting maintenance.
For the less financially endowed manosphere readers, however, you can pick
up a bag of ice torque at your local station, throw them in your bath and
fill it with cold water and # 8212, and then jump in there for about ten
minutes . Your body will absolutely hate you, but thank you later.
summary
Humans are just beginning to understand the complexities of our own body,
but advances in technology and our understanding of the science develops,
we will eventually be able to create a paradise on earth, like Ray Kurzeil,
futurist and author best- seller, believes.
It's predicted that millennials will be the first generation to live
forever, that advances in medicine and technology extending the life grow
exponentially & # 8212; and if this can be the worst possible generation to
give eternal life, I & # 8217; m just happy that we're finally reach this
point.
Learn to shred fat, pack on slabs of lean muscle mass and build a chiseled
physique that women go crazy for! Get Jon Anthony Body of an Alpha program
to 50% while the sale lasts!
Read more: 6 lessons to build your body and mind
complete nonsense, trying to make you buy its latest program. $ 19.95 The
fitness industry is perhaps one of the most BS-mounted in all the existence
and the emerging bio-piracy industry industry is right up there with it.
Bio-hacking is exactly what it sounds like & # 8212; hacking your biology.
Bio-hackers seek to change their environment, adjust their food intake,
change methods of exercise, and use technology to create an optimal body
and mind. Unfortunately, despite the very cool premise, the industry is
full of scams and outright liars artists.
Most bio-best hacks can be done for free, and only some are expensive (over
$ 1000). As someone who's been involved in this area of influence for
years, here's a list of my favorite bio-hacks and effective.
1. Binaural Beats
Do binaural beats work & # 8221 ?; one of my clients asked. Yes, they
work, I said. No, they really like & # 8221 ?; he asked again. Yes, I said.
Are you trying to & # 8221.
Since I presented to binaural beats sometime around 2013, I have
recommended them almost every coach I customer & # 8212; and while they may
seem like something from a science fiction film, it's growing mountain of
evidence proving their effectiveness.
In layman's terms, binaural beats are essentially a series of frequencies
that you listen, played so they alter your brain's state. You want to get
in the state, before going out to get a girl's number? Great, listen to
alpha frequency binaural beats. Or maybe you want to fall asleep quickly?
That's also good, just plug a delta frequency, binaural beats and watch you
slowly drift off to sleep.
Binaural beats are hands down one of the most effective tools of biopiracy
I discovered to date, and in my experience, they will work for about 90% of
people (the remaining 10% of cases difficult). I recommend using the flow
of life, but others have found success with Brain.fm and Hemisync.
2. Alpha Male Posture
Mike Cernovich first popularized this technique in its Gorilla Mindset
morning routine, I urge you to check. We all know that certain postures are
associated with alpha males, and other postures are associated with beta
males, right? Although bio-hacking takes a step further.
With bio-hack alpha male posture, you just imitate the body language of
high status. It is to stand straight with your chest, throwing your arms in
the air, and even beat your chest like a silverback gorilla.
While it may seem silly, it's actually been proven to increase your
testosterone levels and decrease your cortisol in a matter of just 60
seconds. In one experiment, the researchers found that simply changing
their test subjects body language led to a significant difference in their
ability to accomplish a daunting task (bungee jumping).
If you were wondering how to be an alpha male, the best place to start is
to change your behavior. This n t mean neglecting the thought processes
underlying behind being an alpha male, as the realization of these is how
you really turn into a & # 8212; but is certainly something to be said for
this pretend until you do.
3. Light Therapy
For millennia, humans have a complex and intimate relationship with the day
and night. They follow the natural rhythms of sunrise and sunset, which
dictate their daily schedule. Now, however, with artificial light that
bombards us every second of the day, many of us find that our circadian
rhythms are so out of whack.
This is light therapy. is available studies have shown that light
regulation is an effective way to optimize your hormones, energy levels,
and sleep & # 8212; three things every man should value.
The first, and easiest way for you to start light hacking, is to install
the application on your computer F.lux. It automatically dim your screen to
simulate sunrise and sunset, eliminating the light waves of blue frequency
that prevents the production of melatonin.
The second option, and more expensive, is to buy a light box. They can
range from $ 30 to $ 300, and although it might be a bit of an extra
hassle, I strongly recommend that you order one and try it just for a week.
I have a mounted right on my night table, scheduled to blast my face with
10 000 lux of pure light, removing any possibility to go back to sleep.
Expose your eyes to this artificial light, the first thing in the morning
helps regulate your hormones and the sleep cycle, so it can be especially
helpful for people who suffer from insomnia and other sleep disorders.
4. cryotherapy
Experts slowly discover that 99% of our ills are due to inflammation.
Depression has been linked to brain inflamed Crohn's has been linked to
inflammation gastrointestinal tract, and even obesity has been linked to
inflammation of the entire body.
In response to this discovery, a new branch of medicine known under the
name cryotherapy, began to emerge. The idea is simple & # 8212; subjecting
the body to temperatures ungodly to combat inflammation massively. Although
the premise is relatively easy to understand, it has incredible benefits
for health.
cryotherapy centers have been popping up all over the country, and then
they use advanced technology and liquid nitrogen to obtain such cold
temperatures, you can create a DIY version of you. Many athletes now use
cold baths, which can run you around $ 1500 for the installation costs
once, not counting maintenance.
For the less financially endowed manosphere readers, however, you can pick
up a bag of ice torque at your local station, throw them in your bath and
fill it with cold water and # 8212, and then jump in there for about ten
minutes . Your body will absolutely hate you, but thank you later.
summary
Humans are just beginning to understand the complexities of our own body,
but advances in technology and our understanding of the science develops,
we will eventually be able to create a paradise on earth, like Ray Kurzeil,
futurist and author best- seller, believes.
It's predicted that millennials will be the first generation to live
forever, that advances in medicine and technology extending the life grow
exponentially & # 8212; and if this can be the worst possible generation to
give eternal life, I & # 8217; m just happy that we're finally reach this
point.
Learn to shred fat, pack on slabs of lean muscle mass and build a chiseled
physique that women go crazy for! Get Jon Anthony Body of an Alpha program
to 50% while the sale lasts!
Read more: 6 lessons to build your body and mind
Gay Marriage Vote Australia can lead to spectacular failure of the left
Australia is currently voting in a postal survey on the legalization of gay
marriage. A clear majority of Australians support gay marriage, but I
predict that the next "No" will win the vote. When this happens, the
radical left will have no one to blame themselves. There is a strong sense
of a type or Trump Brexit upset in the air, but the main reason for
the "No" campaign will win because the campaign "yes" alienated the
sensible center.
Australia is one of the few countries that has compulsory voting in
elections, but this postal survey is not mandatory and I would be surprised
if the turnout is more than 50%. Opinion polls in recent years have
consistently shown that almost two thirds of Australians support gay
marriage, but the low rate of participation makes the expected result of
the difficult postal survey to predict. Just as the "silent" Trump voters
skewed the exit polls during the US presidential election in 2016, there
are probably about 5% of Australians who tell pollsters they support gay
marriage but who actually vote not.
The "yes" and "no" campaigns
The "Yes" campaign is led by about half of the center-right Liberal power /
national government, including Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, over the
opposition center-left Labor Party of Australia and the Green Party
of 'leftmost. Almost all prominent Australians support the campaign "Yes."
The campaign "No" is directed by religious organizations and some
conservative politicians. The fact that most Australian Muslims will
probably not vote is an ironic twist to the leftists who have made that
difficult campaign to let them enter the country. The overwhelming support
for the "yes" among prominent Australians from politics to sports to
entertainment media reminds opposed to Trump in the US and UK Brexit.
The "Yes" side is not really much of an argument, they just keep
saying "love is love." Presumably they do not think that incest, pedophilia
and polygamy is ok because "love is love" but they are not developed.
The next "No" does not make much of an argument about gay marriage either.
Instead, he claims that gay marriage is another step towards political
correctness and denial of freedom of expression and religious freedom.
former Australian Conservative Minister Tony Abbott urges a "no" to "stop
political correctness in its tracks."
tactics against the left-productive
The left made two key strategic mistakes in his campaign. First, he argues
that he should not be a public debate or public vote on the issue. Second,
it is intimidation, persecution and harassment anyone brave enough to
declare that they will vote "no."
The left has long argued against a public vote on gay marriage by saying
that it will harm the mental health of homosexuals and heterosexuals should
not have the right to decide if gays have "human rights" . The left does
not seem to understand that people do not like what they are and are not
allowed to discuss, debate, say or think.
Some individuals and more radical leftist groups have also been harassed,
intimidated and persecuted who oppose gay marriage. On 22 September, Yes
head butted activist Tony Abbott. A former boxing champion, Abbott assured
the media that he was completely free & # 8221; but said he is concerned
about the new world of same-sex marriage if that is how some of the people
who are most enthusiastically support it & # 8221 act;.
In Canberra, a woman aged 18, named Madeline was fired from her job at a
children's party company to advocate a "no" vote on his private Facebook
wall. Capital Children Parties owner Madlin Sims said she pulled Madeline
because "advertising your desire to vote no for SSM [same-sex marriage] is,
in my eyes, hate speech".
In Brisbane, the National Union of Students organized a rally outside a
church to harass participants to "vote no" meeting. The rally turned
violent and a woman was arrested.
When "not" hired Skywriting Australia activists to write "vote no" in the
sky over Sydney company was abused on social media and the business owner
received a text message harassment torrent there including the following:
& # 8230; you really are a shit man. You are certainly the biggest piece of
shit in Australia today. Probably tomorrow too. Hope you are proud of
yourself. Do not be surprised by the hatred coming for you. Titt for TATT
he is right, right? You stupid, ignorant, ruthless, pathetic old LOSER.
The skywriting organizers later reported that GoFundMe "decided to freeze
our money until we give our names and locations. This is on the back of a
huge amount of hate mail we received from people who want to silence our
message and attack us personally ".
Of course, there are people on the No side who behaved inappropriately too.
The difference is that in the Yes camp, the argument that there should be
no debate, or that those who opposed gay marriage should not be allowed to
give their opinion in general.
Unlike the United States, Australia does not have the freedom of expression
protected by the Constitution. The Australian Parliament has passed laws
imposing fines of up to $ 12 600 to anyone who "vilifying"
or "intimidating" another person during the debate on gay marriage. I think
these laws are applied selectively against the "no" Activists for & # 8221
homophobic; comments.
Lessons for the right
We must not underestimate the radical left, but do not overestimate them
either. Whether themselves and they alienate ten people for each they
convert. We right must not fall into the gutter to fight with these radical
leftists or we will emerge at least as dirty as them. Maintain morality and
promote a civilized debate, freedom of expression and non-violence.
Read more: Is Feminism His worst enemy?
marriage. A clear majority of Australians support gay marriage, but I
predict that the next "No" will win the vote. When this happens, the
radical left will have no one to blame themselves. There is a strong sense
of a type or Trump Brexit upset in the air, but the main reason for
the "No" campaign will win because the campaign "yes" alienated the
sensible center.
Australia is one of the few countries that has compulsory voting in
elections, but this postal survey is not mandatory and I would be surprised
if the turnout is more than 50%. Opinion polls in recent years have
consistently shown that almost two thirds of Australians support gay
marriage, but the low rate of participation makes the expected result of
the difficult postal survey to predict. Just as the "silent" Trump voters
skewed the exit polls during the US presidential election in 2016, there
are probably about 5% of Australians who tell pollsters they support gay
marriage but who actually vote not.
The "yes" and "no" campaigns
The "Yes" campaign is led by about half of the center-right Liberal power /
national government, including Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, over the
opposition center-left Labor Party of Australia and the Green Party
of 'leftmost. Almost all prominent Australians support the campaign "Yes."
The campaign "No" is directed by religious organizations and some
conservative politicians. The fact that most Australian Muslims will
probably not vote is an ironic twist to the leftists who have made that
difficult campaign to let them enter the country. The overwhelming support
for the "yes" among prominent Australians from politics to sports to
entertainment media reminds opposed to Trump in the US and UK Brexit.
The "Yes" side is not really much of an argument, they just keep
saying "love is love." Presumably they do not think that incest, pedophilia
and polygamy is ok because "love is love" but they are not developed.
The next "No" does not make much of an argument about gay marriage either.
Instead, he claims that gay marriage is another step towards political
correctness and denial of freedom of expression and religious freedom.
former Australian Conservative Minister Tony Abbott urges a "no" to "stop
political correctness in its tracks."
tactics against the left-productive
The left made two key strategic mistakes in his campaign. First, he argues
that he should not be a public debate or public vote on the issue. Second,
it is intimidation, persecution and harassment anyone brave enough to
declare that they will vote "no."
The left has long argued against a public vote on gay marriage by saying
that it will harm the mental health of homosexuals and heterosexuals should
not have the right to decide if gays have "human rights" . The left does
not seem to understand that people do not like what they are and are not
allowed to discuss, debate, say or think.
Some individuals and more radical leftist groups have also been harassed,
intimidated and persecuted who oppose gay marriage. On 22 September, Yes
head butted activist Tony Abbott. A former boxing champion, Abbott assured
the media that he was completely free & # 8221; but said he is concerned
about the new world of same-sex marriage if that is how some of the people
who are most enthusiastically support it & # 8221 act;.
In Canberra, a woman aged 18, named Madeline was fired from her job at a
children's party company to advocate a "no" vote on his private Facebook
wall. Capital Children Parties owner Madlin Sims said she pulled Madeline
because "advertising your desire to vote no for SSM [same-sex marriage] is,
in my eyes, hate speech".
In Brisbane, the National Union of Students organized a rally outside a
church to harass participants to "vote no" meeting. The rally turned
violent and a woman was arrested.
When "not" hired Skywriting Australia activists to write "vote no" in the
sky over Sydney company was abused on social media and the business owner
received a text message harassment torrent there including the following:
& # 8230; you really are a shit man. You are certainly the biggest piece of
shit in Australia today. Probably tomorrow too. Hope you are proud of
yourself. Do not be surprised by the hatred coming for you. Titt for TATT
he is right, right? You stupid, ignorant, ruthless, pathetic old LOSER.
The skywriting organizers later reported that GoFundMe "decided to freeze
our money until we give our names and locations. This is on the back of a
huge amount of hate mail we received from people who want to silence our
message and attack us personally ".
Of course, there are people on the No side who behaved inappropriately too.
The difference is that in the Yes camp, the argument that there should be
no debate, or that those who opposed gay marriage should not be allowed to
give their opinion in general.
Unlike the United States, Australia does not have the freedom of expression
protected by the Constitution. The Australian Parliament has passed laws
imposing fines of up to $ 12 600 to anyone who "vilifying"
or "intimidating" another person during the debate on gay marriage. I think
these laws are applied selectively against the "no" Activists for & # 8221
homophobic; comments.
Lessons for the right
We must not underestimate the radical left, but do not overestimate them
either. Whether themselves and they alienate ten people for each they
convert. We right must not fall into the gutter to fight with these radical
leftists or we will emerge at least as dirty as them. Maintain morality and
promote a civilized debate, freedom of expression and non-violence.
Read more: Is Feminism His worst enemy?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)